Lifshitz tail for Schödinger Operators with random δ magnetic fields

Similar documents
A diamagnetic inequality for semigroup differences

Theory and Related Topics) 数理解析研究所講究録別冊 = RIMS Kokyuroku Bessa (2010), B16:

Brownian survival and Lifshitz tail in perturbed lattice disorder

Classical behavior of the integrated density of states for the uniform magnetic field and a randomly perturbed

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

The Anderson Model on the Bethe Lattice: Lifshitz Tails

Stochastic Integration.

PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS

Anderson localization for 2D discrete Schrödinger operator with random vector potential

On semilinear elliptic equations with measure data

Scattering theory for the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Probability and Measure

Local Density Approximation for the Almost-bosonic Anyon Gas. Michele Correggi

Stability of the Magnetic Schrödinger Operator in a Waveguide

Lecture 4: Introduction to stochastic processes and stochastic calculus

Problem set 1, Real Analysis I, Spring, 2015.

Brownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3

Lecture No 1 Introduction to Diffusion equations The heat equat

Matthias Täufer (TU Chemnitz)

Elementary Probability. Exam Number 38119

ELEMENTS OF PROBABILITY THEORY

A Short Introduction to Diffusion Processes and Ito Calculus

4 Divergence theorem and its consequences

Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion

arxiv: v1 [math.sp] 17 Oct 2017

Probability and Measure

Brownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539

Schrödinger operators exhibiting parameter-dependent spectral transitions

Verona Course April Lecture 1. Review of probability

Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

CONTINUITY WITH RESPECT TO DISORDER OF THE INTEGRATED DENSITY OF STATES

ON THE PATHWISE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Potential Theory on Wiener space revisited

Fractional Perimeter and Nonlocal Minimal Surfaces

A PROPERTY OF SOBOLEV SPACES ON COMPLETE RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS

Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator in weighted Lorentz spaces

Brownian Motion and Conditional Probability

1. Stochastic Process

Laplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas

HARMONIC ANALYSIS. Date:

Kolmogorov Equations and Markov Processes

Oblique derivative problems for elliptic and parabolic equations, Lecture II

Fonctions on bounded variations in Hilbert spaces

NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES

Some Tools From Stochastic Analysis

Mathematical Methods for Neurosciences. ENS - Master MVA Paris 6 - Master Maths-Bio ( )

Scaling Limits of Waves in Convex Scalar Conservation Laws under Random Initial Perturbations

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck

The concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.

MATH COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # Introduction to PDEs, Spring 2018 Professor: Jared Speck

Mathematical Notes for E&M Gradient, Divergence, and Curl

Schrödinger operators exhibiting a sudden change of the spectral character

Rigorous Functional Integration with Applications to Nelson s and the Pauli-Fierz Model

UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK

A Fourier analysis based approach of rough integration

Lecture I: Asymptotics for large GUE random matrices

Exercises in stochastic analysis

Uniformly Uniformly-ergodic Markov chains and BSDEs

Convergence at first and second order of some approximations of stochastic integrals

Applications of the periodic unfolding method to multi-scale problems

This note presents an infinite-dimensional family of exact solutions of the incompressible three-dimensional Euler equations

MATH SPRING UC BERKELEY

analysis for transport equations and applications

Delocalization for Schrödinger operators with random Dirac masses

Hypothesis testing for Stochastic PDEs. Igor Cialenco

Chapter 4. Measure Theory. 1. Measure Spaces

lim n C1/n n := ρ. [f(y) f(x)], y x =1 [f(x) f(y)] [g(x) g(y)]. (x,y) E A E(f, f),

Asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues of Laplace operator

Mathematical Tripos Part IA Lent Term Example Sheet 1. Calculate its tangent vector dr/du at each point and hence find its total length.

Topics in fractional Brownian motion

Smilansky-Solomyak model with a δ -interaction

The Chaotic Character of the Stochastic Heat Equation

A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations

Chemistry 532 Problem Set 7 Spring 2012 Solutions

The Euler Equations and Non-Local Conservative Riccati Equations

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4)

A Variational Analysis of a Gauged Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

Random Process Lecture 1. Fundamentals of Probability

Random sets. Distributions, capacities and their applications. Ilya Molchanov. University of Bern, Switzerland

An inverse scattering problem for short-range systems in a time-periodic electric field. François Nicoleau

Ergodic Theorems. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539. Taken from Probability: Theory and examples by R.

Weak Localization for the alloy-type 3D Anderson Model

and BV loc R N ; R d)

On Schrödinger equations with inverse-square singular potentials

GENERALIZED RAY KNIGHT THEORY AND LIMIT THEOREMS FOR SELF-INTERACTING RANDOM WALKS ON Z 1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Periodic Schrödinger operators with δ -potentials

8 Change of variables

Zdzislaw Brzeźniak. Department of Mathematics University of York. joint works with Mauro Mariani (Roma 1) and Gaurav Dhariwal (York)

Knudsen Diffusion and Random Billiards

Figure 1: Grad, Div, Curl, Laplacian in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates. Here ψ is a scalar function and A is a vector field.

NONLOCAL DIFFUSION EQUATIONS

MA8109 Stochastic Processes in Systems Theory Autumn 2013

Beyond the color of the noise: what is memory in random phenomena?

Dudley s representation theorem in infinite dimensions and weak characterizations of stochastic integrability

Lecture 12. F o s, (1.1) F t := s>t

Scaling Limits of Waves in Convex Scalar Conservation Laws Under Random Initial Perturbations

Part IB. Complex Analysis. Year

Probability and Measure

Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus

Lifshitz Tails in Constant Magnetic Fields

Transcription:

Lifshitz tail for Schödinger Operators with random δ magnetic fields Takuya Mine (Kyoto Institute of Technology, Czech technical university in Prague) Yuji Nomura (Ehime University) March 16, 2010 at Arizona School of Analysis with Applications University of Arizona, Tucson Typeset by FoilTEX

Random magnetic Schrödinger operators We consider the Schrödinger operators on R 2 with random mangetic fields: ( ) 2 1 L ω = i a ω, where ω is an element of some probability space (Ω, P). The vectorvalued function a ω = (a ω,x, a ω,y ) is the magnetic vector potential, and the magnetic field corresponding to a ω is given by curl a ω = x a ω,y y a ω,x. Typeset by FoilTEX 1

We assume Random δ magnetic fields curl a ω = γ Γ ω 2πα γ (ω)δ γ (1) in the distribution sense, where Γ ω is a discrete set in R 2, α(ω) = {α γ (ω)} γ Γω is a sequence of real numbers satisfying 0 α γ (ω) < 1, and δ γ is the Dirac measure concentrated on the point γ. Typeset by FoilTEX 2

Assumptions on Γ ω, α ω (A1) For any Borel set E in R 2, the following functions are measurable with respect to ω. n ω (E) = #(Γ ω E), Φ ω (E) = γ Γ ω E α γ (ω) (A2) Let Q 0 = {z = x + iy 1 2 x < 1 2, 1 2 y < 1 2 }. For any Borel set E Q 0, the random variables {n(e + n)} n Z 2 and {Φ(E + n)} n Z 2 are i.i.d. random variables. Typeset by FoilTEX 3

Assumptions on Γ ω, α ω (A3) 0 < E[Φ(Q 0 )] <, V[Φ(Q 0 )] <. (A4) For any ϵ > 0, P{n(Q 0 ) 1 and Φ(Q 0 ) < ϵ} > 0. (A5) For some δ with 0 < δ < 1, P{n(Q 0 ) = n(δq 0 ) = 1} > 0. Typeset by FoilTEX 4

Examples Ex.1 Small perturbation of a lattice. Γ ω = {n + f n (ω)} n Z 2, where {f n } are i.i.d., R 2 -valued random variables satisfying f n (ω) < δ/2 for some deterministic constant δ with 0 < δ < 1. {α γ } are [0, 1)-valued i.i.d. random variables independent of {f n }, satisfying E[α γ ] > 0 and P{α γ < ϵ} > 0 for any ϵ > 0. (2) In this example, f n may be constant (ordinary lattice). Typeset by FoilTEX 5

Examples Ex.2 Poisson model. Γ ω is the Poisson point process on R 2 with intensity measure ρdxdy for some positive constant ρ, i.e., (1) For disjoint E 1,..., E k, N(E 1 ),..., N(E k ) are independent, (2) P{N(E) = j} = (ρ E )j j! e ρ E for j = 0, 1, 2,..., where E is the Lebesgue measure of E. {α γ } are i.i.d. random variables independent of Γ ω and satisfying E[α γ ] > 0 (the assumption (2) in Ex.1 is not necessary; α γ can be constant ). Typeset by FoilTEX 6

Construction of vector potentials For given Γ ω and α ω, we indentify z = (x, y) as the complex number z = x + iy and put a ω = (Im φ ω, Re φ ω ), φ ω (z) = α 0(ω) + z γ Γ ω \{0} α γ (ω) ( 1 z γ + 1 γ + z ) γ 2, (3) where we put α 0 (ω) = 0 if 0 Γ. Under the above assumptions, the sum (3) converges almost surely. Typeset by FoilTEX 7

Construction of vector potentials Let C be a counter-clockwise, closed, simple smooth curve not intersecting with Γ, and D its interior. The magnetic flux through D is calculated as ( x a ω,y y a ω,x )dxdy = (a ω,x dx + a ω,y dy) D C = (Im φ ω dx + Re φ ω dy) = Im φ ω dz C = 2π γ D Γ ω α γ, by the Stokes theorem and the residual theorem. Thus (1) holds. C Typeset by FoilTEX 8

Boundary conditions We define a self-adjoint extension of L ω by H ω u = L ω u, D(H ω ) = {u L 2 (R 2 ) L ω u L 2 (R 2 ), lim sup z γ u(z) < γ Γ ω }. At the point γ with 0 < α γ < 1, the condition lim sup z γ u(z) < can be replaced by lim z γ u(z) = 0. This means there is infinitesimally thin, electrically shielded solenoid at the point γ. Typeset by FoilTEX 9

Integrated density of States Let Q k = {z = x+iy k 1 2 x < k + 1 2, k 1 2 y < k + 1 2 } for k = 0, 1, 2,.... Let Hω k be the self-adjoint realization of the operator ( L ω on L 2 (Q k ) with the Neumann boundary conditions 1 i a ) ω u n = 0 on Qk and the same boundary conditions at γ Γ Q k as above. For E R, we define N k ω(e) = # { eigenvalues of H k ω less than or equal to E }, N(E) = lim k 1 Q k N k ω(e), where denotes the Lebesgue measure. As is well-known, N(E) exists and is independent of ω almost surely. Typeset by FoilTEX 10

Lifshitz tail We can prove that σ(h ω ) = [0, ) under the assumptions (A1) (A4), so inf σ(h ω ) = 0. Our main result is the following. Theorem. Under assumptions (A1) (A5), there exist some constants C > 0 and E 0 > 0 such that for any E with 0 < E < E 0. N(E) e CE 1 (4) The estimate (4) is called the Lifshitz tail, after the name I. M. Lifshitz, who derived this type of estimate in 1964 by some physical consideration. Typeset by FoilTEX 11

History The Lifshitz tail is proved mainly for Schrödinger operators with random scalar potentials, or possibly with a background homogeneous magnetic field. For random magnetic fields, we know: Ueki 00 (Gaussian random magnetic fields) Nakamura 00 (Regular random magnetic fields) Borg Pule 04 (Smooth approximation of δ magnetic fields) Typeset by FoilTEX 12

Known result for random δ magnetic fields In 2006, James Borg considered the Schrödinger operators with random δ magnetic fields in his thesis, with Γ ω = Z 2 (fixed). He obtained the representation of the Laplace transform of the density of states dn, in terms of the winding number of the Brownian motion (the Lifshitz tail was not yet proved in his thesis). Typeset by FoilTEX 13

Two strategies to prove the Lifshitz tail Tauberian theorem. Prove the Laplace transform of dn ρ(t) = 0 e tλ dn(λ) has the asymptotics ρ(t) t 1/2 as t. Then, the Minlos Povzner Tauberian theorem gives the Lifshitz tail. First Eigenvalue. Prove the probability P{λ 1 (H k ω) ck 2 } is small. Then a simple consideration gives the Lifshitz tail. Typeset by FoilTEX 14

Feynman Kac Ito formula Usually, the Feynman Kac Ito formula requires a L 2 loc, however, our potential does not satisfy this assumption. But the set of singularities Γ is a countable set in R 2, which is the polar set, i.e., P x {w : Brownian path starting from x w t Γ for some t} = 0 for any x R 2, where P x denotes the Wiener measure of the Brownian paths starting from x. Using this fact, Borg proved the following. Typeset by FoilTEX 15

Feynman Kac Ito formula Theorem. For any ψ L 2 (R 2 ) and t 0, we have e th ω ψ(x) = E x [ ψ(w(t))e i R t 0 a ω(w(s)) dw ], where the expectation E x is taken over all the Brownian paths w starting from x, and the integral t 0 a ω(w(s)) dw is interpreted in the sense of the Ito stochastic integral. Typeset by FoilTEX 16

Winding number For a closed path w = (u, v) from x to itself which avoids Γ, t 0 t a ω (w(s)) dw = (Im φ ω (w(s))du + Re φ ω (w(s))dv) 0 = Im φ ω (z)dz C = γ Γ 2πα γ (ω)n(w, γ), where C = {u s + iv s 0 s t}, and n(w, γ) the winding number of the path w around γ (n(w, γ) = 0 except finite γ s). Typeset by FoilTEX 17

The formula for Laplace transform of DS By the ergodic theorem and above formulas, we have ρ(t) = e tλ dn(λ) = E ω [Tr(χ Q0 e th ω χ Q0 )] 0 = 1 4πt E ω E 0,z,t,z [e i R t 0 aω(w(s)) dw ]dxdy Q 0 = 1 4πt E ω Q 0 E 0,z,t,z [e 2πiα γ P γ Γ n(w,γ) ]dxdy, where E 0,z,t,z is taken over all the closed Brownian paths from z at time 0, to z at time t. Typeset by FoilTEX 18

IDS and the first eigenvalue By the subadditivity of Nω(E), k it follows that N(E) = 1 inf k Q k E[N ω(e)] k a.s.. Thus we have N(E) 1 Q k CE + Ω Ω N k ω(e)χ λ1 (H k ω ) EdP(ω) χ {λ1 (H k ω ) E}dP(ω) = CE + P{λ 1 (H k ω) E}. Then, we take E ck 2 for small c and estimate the last probability, by using the large deviation technique. Typeset by FoilTEX 19

Avron Herbst Simon inequality Theorem. (Avron Herbst Simon 78) Let a C 1 (R 2 ; R 2 ). Then, R 2 ( ) 1 i a u 2 dxdy R 2 (curl a) u 2 dxdy for any u C 0 (R 2 ). Typeset by FoilTEX 20

Nakamura s idea In Nakamura 00, by using the AHS inequality and the Kato inequality ( (1 i a ) 2 u, u) ( u, u ) he obtained the lower bound for the lowest eigenvalue λ 1 of H ( ) 1 λ 1 (H ω ) λ 1 2 ( + curl a ω). This enables us to reduce the problem to the scalar potential case. However, this method is not applicable for our operator, since curl a ω = 0 a.e. Typeset by FoilTEX 21

Hardy inequality For d 3, there exists a positive constant C d such that R d u(x) 2 dx C d Rd u(x) 2 dx (5) x 2 for any u C 0 (R d ). This inequality is called the Hardy inequality. The inequality (5) fails when d = 2. However, Laptev and Weidl 99 proved that a similar inequality holds if there exists a δ magnetic field at the origin. Typeset by FoilTEX 22

Hardy type inequality ( Theorem.(Laptev Weidl 99) Let α R and put a α (z) = Im α z, Re α ) (so curl a α = 2παδ 0 ). Then, we have z z R ( ) 1 i a α u(z) 2 dxdy ρ(α) z R u(z) 2 dxdy (6) z 2 for any R > 0 and any u C 0 (R 2 \ {0}). Here ρ(α) = min n Z n α 2. Typeset by FoilTEX 23

Proof of main theorem Let us return to our model. Let δ be the constant given in (A5) of our assumption. Then, the probability of the event n ω (Q 0 + n) = n ω (δq 0 + n) = 1 (7) is positive for any n Z 2. When (7) holds, we denote Γ ω (Q 0 + n) = {γ n (ω)}, α n (ω) = α γn (ω)(ω). For z n + Q 0, define 4 V ω (z) = (1 δ) 2ρ(α n(ω)) if (7) holds and z γ n (ω) < 1 δ 2, 0 otherwise. Typeset by FoilTEX 24

Proof of main theorem By using the Laptev Weidl inequality together with some appropriate gauge transform, we have n+q 0 ( ) 1 i a ω u(z) 2 dxdy for any n Z 2 and any u C 0 (R 2 \ Γ ω ). n+q 0 V ω (z) u(z) 2 dxdy (8) Typeset by FoilTEX 25

Proof of main theorem We have u = Re(sgn ū u) = Re(sgn ū( ia ω )u) a.e., where sgn z = z/ z for z 0 and sgn 0 = 0. Thus ( ) 1 i a ω u 2 u 2 a.e. (9) Typeset by FoilTEX 26

Proof of main theorem By (8) and (9), we have the following inequality: Q k ( ) 1 i a ω u 2 dxdy 1 2 Q k ( u 2 + V ω u 2 ) dxdy ( for any u C0 (R 2 \ Γ ω ). This implies λ 1 (H ω ) λ 1 1 2 ( + V ω) ) by the min-max principle. So we can reduce the problem to the scalar potential case. Typeset by FoilTEX 27

Remained problems (1) Can one deduce the Lifshitz tail from the stochastic formula for the Laplace transform of DS? (Control of infinite winding numbers of the Brownian motions...) (2) Does the Anderson localization occur for our operator? (Wegner estimate, etc..) Typeset by FoilTEX 28