Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems 5.1 Reliability Quantification with RBDs

Similar documents
Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Chapter 8. Probability of Failure on Demand using IEC formulas

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Chapter 8. Probability of Failure on Demand using fault trees

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Chapter 9. Average frequency of dangerous failures

Chapter 8. Calculation of PFD using FTA

Chapter 12. Spurious Operation and Spurious Trips

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems 5.4 Petrinets

Chapter 8. Calculation of PFD using Markov

9. Reliability theory

System Reliability Thory 6. Common-Cause Failures

Non-observable failure progression

Imperfect Testing and its Influence on Availability of Safety Instrumented Systems

Engineering Risk Benefit Analysis

CHAPTER 10 RELIABILITY

AVERAGE PROBABILITY OF FAILURE ON DEMAND ESTIMATION FOR BURNER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Chapter 5 Component Importance

Considering Security Aspects in Safety Environment. Dipl.-Ing. Evzudin Ugljesa

Reliability and Availability Simulation. Krige Visser, Professor, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Availability. M(t) = 1 - e -mt

STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, AND MAINTAINABILITY

B.H. Far

Fault-Tolerant Computing

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

Chapter 9 Part II Maintainability

Chapter 5 Reliability of Systems

Chapter 6. a. Open Circuit. Only if both resistors fail open-circuit, i.e. they are in parallel.

ELE 491 Senior Design Project Proposal

Availability and Reliability Analysis for Dependent System with Load-Sharing and Degradation Facility

Reliability of Technical Systems

Fault Tolerance. Dealing with Faults

Concept of Reliability

IMPORTANCE MEASURES FOR MULTICOMPONENT BINARY SYSTEMS

System Reliability Analysis. CS6323 Networks and Systems

Modeling Common Cause Failures in Diverse Components with Fault Tree Applications

Quantitative Reliability Analysis

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

0utline. 1. Tools from Operations Research. 2. Applications

Chapter 5. System Reliability and Reliability Prediction.

A New Approach to System Reliability

Introduction to Reliability Theory (part 2)

Terminology and Concepts

Markov Reliability and Availability Analysis. Markov Processes

Quantitative evaluation of Dependability

Analysis Of System Reliability Using Markov Technique

Choice of Demand Mode for Subsea Safety Systems

EE 445 / 850: Final Examination

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Fault Tolerant Computing ECE 655

B.H. Far

Risk Analysis of Highly-integrated Systems

Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications

A Novel Measure of Component Importance Considering Cost for All-Digital Protection Systems

Monte Carlo Simulation for Reliability and Availability analyses

Lecture 5 Probability

Partial stroke tests as a procedure for the extension of the proof test interval

Performance analysis of a juice packaging plant using BFT

Failure rate in the continuous sense. Figure. Exponential failure density functions [f(t)] 1

Common Cause Failure (CCF)

Evaluating the PFD of Safety Instrumented Systems with Partial Stroke Testing

Combinational Techniques for Reliability Modeling

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for system reliability

Integrated Dynamic Decision Analysis: a method for PSA in dynamic process system

Coherent Systems of Components with Multivariate Phase Type Life Distributions

The random counting variable. Barbara Russo

Combination of safety integrity levels (SILs): A study of IEC61508 merging rules

Fault-Tolerant Computing

Reliable Computing I

RISK- AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS WITH APPLICATIONS

Reliability of Technical Systems

Dependable Systems. ! Dependability Attributes. Dr. Peter Tröger. Sources:

Chapter 15. System Reliability Concepts and Methods. William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar Iowa State University and Louisiana State University

FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS

Statistics for Engineers Lecture 4 Reliability and Lifetime Distributions

Modeling and Simulation of Communication Systems and Networks Chapter 1. Reliability

Cyber Physical Power Systems Power in Communications

Reliability Engineering I

CHAPTER 9 AVAILABILITY DEMONSTRATION PLANS CONTENTS

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF RELIABILITY AND PROBABILITY MEASURES

Failure modeling and maintenance optimization for a railway line

Application of the Cause-Consequence Diagram Method to Static Systems

ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENT PROTECTION LAYERS AND SAFETY INSTRUMENTED SYSTEM FOR OIL GAS SEPARATOR USING BAYESIAN METHODS

A STUDY OF ASYMPTOTIC AVAILABILITY MODELING FOR A FAILURE AND A REPAIR RATES FOLLOWING A WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

UNAVAILABILITY CALCULATIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF COMPUTER ACCURACY ABSTRACT

Key Words: Lifetime Data Analysis (LDA), Probability Density Function (PDF), Goodness of fit methods, Chi-square method.

Evaluating Safety Integrity Level in presence of uncertainty

Practical Applications of Reliability Theory

Chapter 18 Section 8.5 Fault Trees Analysis (FTA) Don t get caught out on a limb of your fault tree.

Quantification of the safety level of a safety-critical control system K. Rástočný 1, J. Ilavský 1

Reliability analysis of systems and lattice polynomial description

Cost Analtsis for a Nuclear Power Plant with Standby Redundant Reactor Vessel

Dependability Analysis

Quantitative evaluation of Dependability

Die Fallstricke der Verfügbarkeit (Trapped with availability) Hendrik Schäbe

Examination paper for TMA4275 Lifetime Analysis

Module No. # 03 Lecture No. # 11 Probabilistic risk analysis

Chapter 4 Availability Analysis by Simulation and Markov Chain

Analysis methods for fault trees that contain secondary failures

SAT, NP, NP-Completeness

R E A D : E S S E N T I A L S C R U M : A P R A C T I C A L G U I D E T O T H E M O S T P O P U L A R A G I L E P R O C E S S. C H.

Continuous case Discrete case General case. Hazard functions. Patrick Breheny. August 27. Patrick Breheny Survival Data Analysis (BIOS 7210) 1/21

Mean fault time for estimation of average probability of failure on demand.

A A Multi-Echelon Inventory Model for a Reparable Item with one-for. for- one Replenishment

Transcription:

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems 5.1 Reliability Quantification with RBDs Mary Ann Lundteigen and Marvin Rausand mary.a.lundteigen@ntnu.no &marvin.rausand@ntnu.no RAMS Group Department of Production and Quality Engineering NTNU (Version 1.1 per August 2015) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 1 / 20

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Slides related to the book Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems Theory and Applications Wiley, 2014 Theory and Applications Marvin Rausand Homepage of the book: http://www.ntnu.edu/ross/ books/sis M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 2 / 20

Purpose The purpose of this slide series is to: 1. Briefly present the main properties of reliability block diagrams (RBDs) 2. Briefly present the main approach to developing structure functions 3. Present formulas for quantifying reliability based on structure functions, including: 4. Probality of failure 5. Mean time to failure (MTTF) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 3 / 20

Application of RBDs RBD: A diagram that gives the relationship between component states and the success or failure of a specified system function. An RBD: Has a single stating point (a) and end point (b) Use rectagles or squares to represent each task (or function) carried out by the system items Use lines and structuring into series or parallel structure, or a combination of these to illustrate the logical relationship between the functions M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 4 / 20

RBD applied to SIF A safety instrumented function (SIF) may be represented by an RBD by: A single stating point (a) and end point (b) Rectagles or squares corresponding to the function of each subsystem, or a further breakdown of the subsystem items. Series or parallel structure, or a combination of these to illustrate the logical relationship between the subfunctions Parallel structure (or system): A system that is functioning if at least one of its n items is functioning. Series structure (or system): A system that is functioning if and only if all of its n items are functioning. M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 5 / 20

RBD example (a) Sensor subsystem Logic solver subsystem Final element subsystem (b) PT1 PT2 Figure: A SIF modelled with RBD Each subsystems may be broken down to the item level. This is illustrated for the sensor subsystem above, where two pressure transmitters (PTs) are included in a parallel structure. M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 6 / 20

Item state versus system state State of items: Each item in a RBD has two possible states: functioning or failed. The state of an item i can be represented by a state variable, x i, where: x i = 1 if item i is functioning 0 otherwise x = (x 1,x 2,...,x n ) is called the state vector. State of system: The state of the system can be described by the binary function ϕ(x), also called the structure function: ϕ(x) = ϕ(x 1,x 2,...,x n ) ϕ(x) = 1 if the system is functioning 0 otherwise M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 7 / 20

Structure function of series and parallel stuctures The structure function of a series structure is: ϕ(x) = x 1 x 2 x n = n i=1 x i The structure function of a parallell structure is: ϕ(x) = 1 (1 x 1 )(1 x 2 ) (1 x n ) = 1 n (1 x i ) i=1 M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 8 / 20

Structure function of koon structures A special case is the koon, which is functioning if (at least) k out of n items are functioning. This means that the structure function becomes: ϕ(x) = 1 if k i=1 x i k 0 otherwise The most easy way to set up the structure function for a system with i different items is to first determine the minimal path sets and then use the fact thatthe system is functioning if the items of at least one path set is functioning (or alternatively, determine the minimal cut sets, and use the fact that the system fails if the items contained in one or more of the cut sets fail). M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 9 / 20

Minimal path sets Minimal path set: A minimal path is a set of items that if functioning secures that the system is functioning. A path set is said to be minimal if it cannot be reduced without loosing its status as a path set. Example Path sets are: {1,2}, {1,3}, {2,3}, and {1,2,3}. The three first ones are minimal. (a) 1 2 1 3 2 3 (b) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 10 / 20

Minimal cut sets Minimal cut set: A minimal cut is a set of items that by failing secures that the system fails. A cut set is said to be minimal if it cannot be reduced without losing its status as a path set. Example Cut sets are: {1,2}, {1,3}, {2,3}, and {1,2,3}. The three first ones are minimal. Note that in this particular case, the minimal cut sets become identical to the minimal path sets. (a) 1 2 1 3 2 3 (b) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 11 / 20

Structure function of a SIF Consider a SIF with a sensor subsystem with 2oo3 voted pressure transmitters (PTs), one logic solver (LS), and two 1oo2 voted shutdown valves (SDVs). The structure function is: ϕ(x) = (x PT1 x PT2 + x PT1 x PT3 + x PT2 x PT3 2x PT1 x PT2 x PT3 ) x LS (x SDV1 + x SDV2 x SDV1 x SDV2 ) PT1 PT1 SDV1 PT1 PT1 LS SDV2 PT1 PT1 Note: Error in figure for PTs (to be updated) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 12 / 20

From structure function to reliability function In the structure function, the state variable x i is a deterministic quantity (functioning or failed). In system reliability analyses, we consider the state variables as random and dependent on time, denoted x i instead of X i (t). The randomness makes it of interest to determine the probability of being in a specific state, functioning or failed: Pr(X i (t) = 1) = Pr(T > t) = p i (t) Pr(X i (t) = 0) = Pr(T < t) = 1 Pr(T > t) = 1 p i (t) M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 13 / 20

The reliability function at item level We often refer to p i (t) as: The survival function R i (t) for item i, if the item is non-repairable, and The availability function A i (t) for item i, if the item is repairable (i.e., repaired upon failure) Example The survival function for an item where we assume exponential time to failure is: R i (t) = e λ it where λ i is the constant failure rate of item i and t is the time at which the survival probability is calculated. M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 14 / 20

The reliability function, p s (t), at system level For non-repairable systems, the reliability functions (p s (t)) are: System Series structure Parallel structure koon structure (identical items) Reliability function p s (t) ni=1 p i (t) 1 n i=1 (1 p i (t)) ( nj=k nj ) p(t) j (1 p(t)) n j Note that the koon here constitutes identical components p 1 (t),p 2 (t) p n (t) are equal and equal to p(t). M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 15 / 20

The reliability function, R s (t), at system level For non-repairable systems, assuming expontially distributed time to failure, we get: System Series structure Reliability function R s (t) ni=1 e λit = e ( n i=1 λ i )t Parallel structure 1 n i=1 (1 e λ it ) koon structure (identical items) nj=k ( nj ) e jλ i t (1 e λ it ) n j M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 16 / 20

Mean time to failure (MTTF) For non-repairable systems, we may calculate the MTTF at the item level and at the system level. Item level: System level: MTTF = R i (t)dt t=0 MTTF = R s (t)dt t=0 Example A series of two components has MTTF equal: MTTF = e (λ 1+λ 2 )t 1 dt = t=0 λ 1 + λ 2 M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 17 / 20

A 2oo4 system Consider a subsystem of four identical components in a 2oo4 voted structure. The component type has a constant failure rate λ. The survival function becomes: R s (t) = 4 j=2 ( ) 4 e jλt (1 e λt ) 4 j j = 6e 2λt 8e 3λt + 3e 4λt MTTF becomes: MTTF = 6 2λ 8 3λ + 3 4λ = 13 12λ M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 18 / 20

Repairable systems For repairable systems, we replace each survival probabilities p i (t) by its availability A i (t). Often, we work with average availabilities (A i ) rather than the time dependent availabilities, and more specifically average unavailabilities (Ā i ). Consider a series system of two components, with failure rates λ 1 and λ 2, respectively: Ā 1 = Pr(Comp 1 fails first an item has failed) = Pr(T 2 > T 1 ) = λ 1 λ 1 + λ 2 The same can be set up for Component 2 (Ā 2 ). M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 19 / 20

Repairable systems Each time the component fails, it has a mean downtime MDT i,i = 1..2. If the system goes down it is either down due to component 1 or component 2: MDT S = λ 1 λ 2 MDT 1 + MDT 2 λ 1 + λ 2 λ 1 + λ 2 The average unavailability of the system, A avg, is therefore: A avg = (λ 1 + λ 2 ) MDT S For parallel systems it is not so straight forward due to the average of products being not equal to the product of averages. M.A.Lundteigen (RAMS Group) Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems (Version 1.1) 20 / 20