Discrete-time linear systems

Similar documents
Automatic Control 2. Model reduction. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

4F3 - Predictive Control

Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background

Integral action in state feedback control

Automatic Control 2. Nonlinear systems. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Identification Methods for Structural Systems

Control Systems Design

Homogeneous and particular LTI solutions

Discrete and continuous dynamic systems

Optimal control and estimation

Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016

Math Ordinary Differential Equations

Control Systems Design

16.30 Estimation and Control of Aerospace Systems

EEE582 Homework Problems

Continuous Dynamics Solving LTI state-space equations גרא וייס המחלקה למדעי המחשב אוניברסיטת בן-גוריון

Lecture: Sampling. Automatic Control 2. Sampling. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

ECE504: Lecture 8. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 28-Oct-2008

Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu

Lecture 4: Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations

Control System Design

Automatique. A. Hably 1. Commande d un robot mobile. Automatique. A.Hably. Digital implementation

Solution of Linear State-space Systems

Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli

Control Systems. Internal Stability - LTI systems. L. Lanari

Identification Methods for Structural Systems. Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi Lecture March, 2016

ELEC 3035, Lecture 3: Autonomous systems Ivan Markovsky

Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs

EE263: Introduction to Linear Dynamical Systems Review Session 6

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : Dynamic Systems Spring 2011

Linearization problem. The simplest example

ACM/CMS 107 Linear Analysis & Applications Fall 2016 Assignment 4: Linear ODEs and Control Theory Due: 5th December 2016

Stabilisation of Linear Time-Invariant Systems subject to Output Saturation

Ingegneria dell Automazione - Sistemi in Tempo Reale p.1/28

Linear System Theory

EE363 homework 7 solutions

Rural/Urban Migration: The Dynamics of Eigenvectors

Module 09 From s-domain to time-domain From ODEs, TFs to State-Space Modern Control

Frequency domain analysis

Sampling of Linear Systems

1 Continuous-time Systems

MATH4406 (Control Theory) Unit 6: The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Model Predictive Control (MPC) Prepared by Yoni Nazarathy, Artem

AC&ST AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY SYSTEMS AND MODELS. Claudio Melchiorri

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECED4601 Digital Control System Lab3 Digital State Space Model

Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis

Theory of Linear Systems Exercises. Luigi Palopoli and Daniele Fontanelli

Input-to-state stability and interconnected Systems

Linear System Theory. Wonhee Kim Lecture 1. March 7, 2018

Control Systems. Time response

EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 7: State Space Representations

CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS

Autonomous system = system without inputs

EC744 Lecture Notes: Economic Dynamics. Prof. Jianjun Miao

Perspective. ECE 3640 Lecture 11 State-Space Analysis. To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time. Objective: systems

Chapter III. Stability of Linear Systems

ME Fall 2001, Fall 2002, Spring I/O Stability. Preliminaries: Vector and function norms

Automatic Control Systems theory overview (discrete time systems)

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control

STATE-SPACE DYNAMIC SYSTEMS (DISCRETE-TIME)

Lecture 2 and 3: Controllability of DT-LTI systems

Lecture 4. Chapter 4: Lyapunov Stability. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.

Control Systems. Time response. L. Lanari

ESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control

Linear ODEs. Existence of solutions to linear IVPs. Resolvent matrix. Autonomous linear systems

Dynamic interpretation of eigenvectors

Symbolic Dynamics of Digital Signal Processing Systems

ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. 1. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. e Aτ BB e A τ dτ

Chapter 7. Canonical Forms. 7.1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

Why do we need a model?

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1

CDS 101 Precourse Phase Plane Analysis and Stability

Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2015 Note 22

9 Controller Discretization

Lecture 4 Continuous time linear quadratic regulator

Linear Systems. Manfred Morari Melanie Zeilinger. Institut für Automatik, ETH Zürich Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zürich

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4.

ECE557 Systems Control

Control Systems Lab - SC4070 Control techniques

Data Driven Discrete Time Modeling of Continuous Time Nonlinear Systems. Problems, Challenges, Success Stories. Johan Schoukens

Logistic Map, Euler & Runge-Kutta Method and Lotka-Volterra Equations

21 Linear State-Space Representations

ECE 602 Exam 2 Solutions, 3/23/2011.

Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1

Differential Equations

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

2 Lyapunov Stability. x(0) x 0 < δ x(t) x 0 < ɛ

Properties of Open-Loop Controllers

Poincaré Map, Floquet Theory, and Stability of Periodic Orbits

Solving Dynamic Equations: The State Transition Matrix

Lyapunov Stability Theory

Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems

Department of Mathematics IIT Guwahati

4F3 - Predictive Control

Autonomous Systems and Stability

Nonlinear Control Lecture # 14 Input-Output Stability. Nonlinear Control

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization

Transcription:

Automatic Control Discrete-time linear systems Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2-2 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 / 34

Introduction Introduction 3.5 y(t), y(kt s ) 4 u(kt s ) 3 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 2 2.5.5 2 3 4 5 time t Sampling of a continuous signal 2 3 4 5 time t Discrete-time signal Discrete-time models describe relationships between sampled variables x(kt s ), u(kt s ), y(kt s ), k =,,... The value x(kt s ) is kept constant during the sampling interval [kt s, (k + )T s ) A discrete-time signal can either represent the sampling of a continuous-time signal, or be an intrinsically discrete signal Discrete-time signals are at the basis of digital controllers (as well as of digital filters in signal processing) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 2 / 34

Difference equations Difference equation Consider the first order difference equation (autonomous system) x(k + ) = ax(k) x() = x The solution is x(k) = a k x 3 2.5 a> 2 x(k).5 a=.5 <a< 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 3 / 34

Difference equations Difference equation First-order difference equation with input (non-autonomous system) The solution has the form x(k + ) = ax(k) + bu(k) x() = x x(k) = a k x }{{} natural response a i bu(k i) k + i= } {{ } forced response The natural response depends on the initial condition x(), the forced response on the input signal u(k) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 4 / 34

Difference equations Example - Wealth of a bank account k: year counter ρ: interest rate x(k): wealth at the beginning of year k u(k): money saved at the end of year k x : initial wealth in bank account Discrete-time model: x k u(k) 5 k ρ % x(k + ) = ( + ρ)x(k) + u(k) x() = x 5 45 4 35 3 Stored amount of money (keur) x(k) 25 2 x(k) = (.) k + (.)k. 5 = 6(.)k 5 5 5.5.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 k (years) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 5 / 34

Difference equations Linear discrete-time system Consider the set of n first-order linear difference equations forced by the input u(k) x (k + ) = a x (k) +... + a n x n (k) +b u(k) x 2 (k + ) = a 2 x (k) +... + a 2n x n (k) +b 2 u(k)... x n (k + ) = a n x (k) +... + a nn x n (k) +b n u(k) x () = x,... x n () = x n In compact matrix form: x(k + ) = Ax(k) + Bu(k) where x = x.. n. x n x() = x Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 6 / 34

Difference equations Linear discrete-time system The solution is x(k) = A k x }{{} natural response If matrix A is diagonalizable, A = TΛT Λ =. λ... λ 2.... A i Bu(k i) k + i=...... A k = T.... λ n } {{ } forced response λ k... λ k 2............. λ k n where T = [v... v n ] collects n independent eigenvectors. T Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 7 / 34

Modal response Modal response Assume input u(k) =, k Assume A is diagonalizable, A = TΛT The state trajectory (natural response) is where x(k) = A k x = TΛ k T x = n α i λ k i v i λ i = eigenvalues of A v i = eigenvectors of A α i = coefficients that depend on the initial condition x() α = i= α.. = T x(), T = [v... v n ] α n The system modes depend on the eigenvalues of A, as in continuous-time Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 8 / 34

Modal response Example Consider the linear discrete-time system x (k + ) = 2 x (k) + 2 x 2(k) x 2 (k + ) = x 2 (k) + u(k) x () = x 2 () = x(k + ) = x() = 2 2 x(k) + u(k) Eigenvalues of A: λ = 2, λ 2 = Solution: x(k) = = = 2 2 k k + 2 i= 2 k 2 k k + i= k k 2 + i= }{{} natural response 2 i u(k i) 2 i u(k i) 2 i u(k i) } {{ } forced response.5.5.5 x (k),x 2 (k).5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 step k simulation for u(k) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 9 / 34

Linear difference equations n th -order difference equation Consider the n th -order difference equation forced by u a n y(k n) + a n y(k n + ) + + a y(k ) + y(k) = b n u(k n) + + b u(k ) + b u(k) Equivalent linear discrete-time system in canonical state matrix form...... x(k + ) =... x(k) +. u(k)... a n a n a n 2... a y(k) = (b n b a n )... (b b a ) x(k) + b u(k) There are infinitely many state-space realizations MATLAB tf2ss n th -order difference equations are very useful for digital filters, digital controllers, and to reconstruct models from data (system identification) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 / 34

Discrete-time linear systems Discrete-time linear system x(k + ) = Ax(k) + Bu(k) y(k) = Cx(k) + Du(k) x() = x Given the initial condition x() and the input sequence u(k), k, it is possible to predict the entire sequence of states x(k) and outputs y(k), k The state x() summarizes all the past history of the system The dimension n of the state x(k) n is called the order of the system The system is called proper (or strictly causal) if D = General multivariable case: x(k) n u(k) m y(k) p A n n B n m C p n D p m Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 / 34

Discrete-time linear systems Example - Student dynamics Problem Statement: 3-years undergraduate course percentages of students promoted, repeaters, and dropouts are roughly constant direct enrollment in 2nd and 3rd academic year is not allowed students cannot enrol for more than 3 years Notation: k Year x i (k) Number of students enrolled in year i at year k, i =, 2, 3 u(k) Number of freshmen at year k y(k) Number of graduates at year k α i promotion rate during year i, α i β i failure rate during year i, β i γ i dropout rate during year i, γ i = α i β i 3 rd -order linear discrete-time system: x (k + ) = β x (k) + u(k) x 2 (k + ) = α x (k) + β 2 x 2 (k) x 3 (k + ) = α 2 x 2 (k) + β 3 x 3 (k) y(k) = α 3 x 3 (k) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 2 / 34

Discrete-time linear systems Example - Student dynamics In matrix form β x(k + ) = α β 2 x(k) + u(k) α 2 β 3 y(k) = α 3 x(k) Simulation 4 y(k) α =.6 β =.2 α 2 =.8 β 2 =.5 α 3 =.9 β 3 =.8 u(k) 5, k = 22,... 2 22 24 26 28 22 5 5 step k u(k) 49 22 24 26 28 22 step k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 3 / 34

Lecture: Discrete-time linear systems Discrete-time linear systems Example - Supply chain!x(k)!2x2(k) "2x2(k) "x(k) u(k) #3x3(k) P S x(k) y(k) $3x3(k) R x2(k) x3(k) Problem Statement: S purchases the quantity u(k) of raw material at each month k a fraction δ of raw material is discarded, a fraction α is shipped to producer P a fraction α2 of product is sold by P to retailer R, a fraction δ2 is discarded retailer R returns a fraction β3 of defective products every month, and sells a fraction γ3 to customers Mathematical model: x (k + ) x2 (k + ) x3 (k + ) y(k) = = = = ( α δ )x (k) + u(k) α x (k) + ( α2 δ2 )x2 (k) + β3 x3 (k) α2 x2 (k) + ( β3 γ3 )x3 (k) γ3 x3 (k) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control k x (k) x2 (k) x3 (k) y(k) month counter raw material in S products in P products in R products sold to customers Academic year 2-2 4 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Equilibrium Consider the discrete-time nonlinear system x(k + ) = f(x(k), u(k)) y(k) = g(x(k), u(k)) Definition A state x r n and an input u r m are an equilibrium pair if for initial condition x() = x r and constant input u(k) u r, k, the state remains constant: x(k) x r, k Equivalent definition: (x r, u r ) is an equilibrium pair if f(x r, u r ) = x r x r is called equilibrium state, u r equilibrium input The definition generalizes to time-varying discrete-time nonlinear systems Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 5 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Stability Consider the nonlinear system x(k + ) = f(x(k), ur ) y(k) = g(x(k), u r ) and let x r an equilibrium state, f(x r, u r ) = x r Definition The equilibrium state x r is stable if for each initial conditions x() close enough to x r, the corresponding trajectory x(k) remains near x r for all k a a Analytic definition: ε > δ > : x() x r < δ x(k) x r < ε, k The equilibrium point x r is called asymptotically stable if it is stable and x(k) x r for k Otherwise, the equilibrium point x r is called unstable Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 6 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Stability of first-order linear systems Consider the first-order linear system x(k + ) = ax(k) + bu(k) x r =, u r = is an equilibrium pair For u(k), k =,,..., the solution is The origin x r = is x(k) = a k x unstable if a > stable if a asymptotically stable if a < x(k) 3 2.5 2.5 x a> a= <a<.5 x r a= 2 4 6 8 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 7 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Stability of discrete-time linear systems Since the natural response of x(k + ) = Ax(k) + Bu(k) is x(k) = A k x, the stability properties depend only on A. We can therefore talk about system stability of a discrete-time linear system (A, B, C, D) Theorem: Let λ,..., λ m, m n be the eigenvalues of A n n. The system x(k + ) = Ax(k) + Bu(k) is asymptotically stable iff λ i <, i =,..., m (marginally) stable if λ i, i =,..., m, and the eigenvalues with unit modulus have equal algebraic and geometric multiplicity a unstable if i such that λ i > a Algebraic multiplicity of λ i = number of coincident roots λ i of det(λi A). Geometric multiplicity of λ i = number of linearly independent eigenvectors v i, Av i = λ i v i The stability properties of a discrete-time linear system only depend on the modulus of the eigenvalues of matrix A Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 8 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Stability of discrete-time linear systems Proof: The natural response is x(k) = A k x If matrix A is diagonalizable, A = TΛT, λ... λ 2... Take any eigenvalue λ = ρe jθ : Λ =...... A k = T...... λ n λ k... λ k 2.... λ k = ρ k e jkθ = ρ k......... λ k n T A is always diagonalizable if algebraic multiplicity - geometric multiplicity If A is not diagonalizable, it can be transformed to Jordan form. In this case the natural response x(t) contains modes k j λ k, j =,,..., alg. multiplicity = geom. multiplicity Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 9 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Example x(k + ) = x(k) 2 x() = x x 2 eigenvalues of A:, 2 solution: x (k) =, k =, 2,... x 2 (k) = k 2 x + k 2 x2, k =, 2,....5.5 x (k) x 2 (k).5 asymptotically stable.5.5 2 4 6 8 k 2 4 6 8 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 2 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Example 2 x(k + ) = x() = x x 2 x(k) eigenvalues of A: {+j, j} solution: x (k) = x cos kπ 2 + x 2 sin kπ 2, k =,,... x 2 (k) = x sin kπ 2 + x 2 cos kπ 2, k =,,...,.8.8.6.6.4.4 x (k).2 x 2 (k).2 marginally stable.2.2.4.4.6.6.8.8 2 4 6 k 2 4 6 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 2 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Example 3 x(k + ) = x(k) x() = x x 2 x (k) = x + x 2 k, k =,,... x 2 (k) = x 2, k =,,... eigenvalues of A: {, } Note: A is not diagonalizable! 7 2 6.5 5 4 3.5 x (k) 2 x 2 (k) unstable.5 2.5 3 2 4 6 k 2 2 3 4 5 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 22 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Example 4 2 x(k + ) = x(k) x() = x x 2 eigenvalues of A: {, 2} solution: x (k) = 2 k x, k =,,... x 2 (k) = 2 k x, k =, 2,... 8 8 6 6 4 4 x (k) 2 x 2 (k) 2 unstable 2 2 4 2 4 6 k 4 2 3 4 5 k Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 23 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Zero eigenvalues Modes λ i = determine finite-time convergence to zero. This has no continuous-time counterpart, where instead all converging modes tend to zero in infinite time (e λ it ) Example: dynamics of a buffer u(k) x 3(k) x 2(k) x (k) y(k) x (k + ) = x 2 (k) x 2 (k + ) = x 3 (k) x 3 (k + ) = u(k) y(k) = x (k) x(k + ) = x(k) + u(k) y(k) = x(k) Natural response: A 3 x() = for all x() 3 For u(k), the buffer deploys after at most 3 steps! Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 24 / 34

Stability of discrete-time linear systems Summary of stability conditions for linear systems system continuous-time discrete-time asympt. stable i =,..., n R(λ i ) < λ i < unstable i such that R(λ i ) > λ i > stable i,..., n R(λ i ) λ i and λ i such that R(λ i ) = λ i = algebraic = geometric mult. Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 25 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Exact sampling Consider the continuos-time system ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t) x() = x We want to characterize the value of x(t), y(t) at the time instants t =, T s, 2T s,..., kt s,..., under the assumption that the input u(t) is constant during each sampling interval (zero-order hold, ZOH).5 y(t), y(kt s ) 2 u(t), u(kt s ).5 u(t) = ū(k), kt s t < (k + )T s.5.5 x(k) x(kt s ) and ȳ(k) y(kt s ) are the state and the output samples at the k th sampling instant, respectively.5.5.5 2 4 6 8 time t 2 2 4 6 8 time t Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 26 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Exact sampling Let us evaluate the response of the continuous-time system between time t = kt s and t = (k + )T s from the initial condition x(t ) = x(kt s ) using Lagrange formula: x(t) = e A(t t ) x(t )+ t t e A(t σ) Bu(σ)dσ = e A((k+)Ts kts) x(kt s )+ (k+)ts kt s e A((k+)Ts σ) Bu(σ)dσ Since the input u(t) is piecewise constant, u(σ) ū(k), kt s σ < (k + )T s. By setting τ = σ kt s we get Ts x((k + )T s ) = e AT s x(kt s ) + e A(T s τ) dτ Bu(kT s ) and hence Ts x(k + ) = e ATs x(k) + e A(T s τ) dτ Bū(k) which is a linear difference relation between x(k) and ū(k)! Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 27 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Exact sampling The discrete-time system x(k + ) = Ā x(k) + Bū(k) ȳ(k) = C x(k) + Dū(k) depends on the original continuous-time system through the relations Ā e AT s, B Ts e A(T s τ) dτ B, C C, D D If u(t) is piecewise constant, (Ā, B, C, D) provides the exact evolution of state and output samples at discrete times kt s.4 y(t), y(kt s ).2 MATLAB sys=ss(a,b,c,d); sysd=c2d(sys,ts); [Ab,Bb,Cb,Db]=ssdata(sysd);.2.4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 time t.5 u(t), u(kt s ).5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 time t Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 28 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Exact sampling Rule of thumb: T s of the rise time = time to move from % to 9% of the steady-state value, for input u(t), x() =.9 9 % rise time.8 y(t), y(kt s ).8.6.4.7.2 output.6.5.4.5.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 2 time t u(t), u(kt s ).3.5.2. % rise time 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 time t.5.5.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 time t More on the choice of sampling time in the second part of the course... Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 29 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Approximate sampling - Euler s method ẋ(kt s ) x((k + )T s) x(kt s ) T s x(t) x((k x((k+)t + )Ts) ) x((k + x((k+)t )Ts) ) x(kt x(kts) ) T Ts x(kts) ) For nonlinear systems ẋ(t) = f(x(t), u(t)): kt kts x(k + ) = x(k) + T s f( x(k), ū(k)) Ts T ẋ(kts) _x(t) (k (k+)t + )Ts t Leonhard Paul Euler (77-783) For linear systems ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t): x((k + )T s ) = (I + T s A)x(kT s ) + T s Bu(kT s ) Ā I + AT s, B T s B, C C, D D Note that e T sa = I + T s A +... + Tn s An n! +... Therefore when T s is small Euler s method and exact sampling are similar Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 3 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Example - Hydraulic system Continuous time: d dt h(t) = a 2g A h(t) + A u(t) q(t) = a 2g h(t) Discrete time: T h(k + ) = h(k) s a 2g T A h(k) + s A ū(k) q(k) = a 2g h(k) u 7 6 level h(t) (m) 5 4 h q 3 2 continuous time Euler approximation 5 5 2 25 3 time (s) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 3 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems Tustin s discretization method Assume u(k) constant within the sampling interval. Given the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu, apply the trapezoidal rule to approximate the integral and therefore x(k + ) x(k) = (k+)ts kt s ẋ(t)dt = (k+)ts kt s (Ax(t) + Bu(t))dt T s (Ax(k) + Bu(k) + Ax(k + ) + Bu(k)) (trapezoidal rule) 2 (I T s 2 A)x(k + ) = (I + T s 2 )x(k) + T sbu(k) x(k + ) = I T s 2 A I + T s 2 A x(k) + I T s 2 A T s Bu(k) Advantage: simpler to compute than exponential matrix, without too much loss of approximation quality Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 32 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems N-steps Euler method We can obtain the matrices A, B of the discrete-time linearized model while integrating the nonlinear continuous-time dynamic equations ẋ = f(x, u) N-steps explicit forward Euler method: given x(k), u(k), execute the following steps x = x(k), A = I, B = 2 for n=:n do 3 end A (I + T s N B (I + T s N x x + T s N f x (x, u(k))a f x (x, u(k))b + T s N f(x, u(k)) f u (x, u(k))a 4 return x(k + ) x and matrices A, B such that x(k + ) Ax(k) + Bu(k). Property: the difference between the state x(k + ) and its approximation x computed by the above iterations satisfies x(k + ) x) = O T s N Explicit forward Runge-Kutta 4 method also available Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 33 / 34

Sampling continuous-time systems English-Italian Vocabulary discrete-time linear systems sampling interval difference equation zero-order hold piecewise constant rise time sistemi lineari a tempo discreto tempo (o intervallo) di campionamento equazione alle differenze mantenitore di ordine zero costante a tratti tempo di salita Translation is obvious otherwise. Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control Academic year 2-2 34 / 34