Midterm 2 PROBLEM POINTS MAX

Similar documents
Outline. 4 Mechanical Sensors Introduction General Mechanical properties Piezoresistivity Piezoresistive Sensors Capacitive sensors Applications

Lecture 20. Measuring Pressure and Temperature (Chapter 9) Measuring Pressure Measuring Temperature MECH 373. Instrumentation and Measurements

Published by: PIONEER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GROUP(

Biosensors and Instrumentation: Tutorial 2

DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF UNDER WATER ACOUSTIC MEMS SENSOR

EE C245 / ME C218 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DESIGN FALL 2009 PROBLEM SET #7. Due (at 7 p.m.): Thursday, Dec. 10, 2009, in the EE C245 HW box in 240 Cory.

EE C245 / ME C218 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DESIGN FALL 2011 C. Nguyen PROBLEM SET #7. Table 1: Gyroscope Modeling Parameters

SENSOR DEVICES MECHANICAL SENSORS

Design and Analysis of dual Axis MEMS Capacitive Accelerometer

Lecture 19. Measurement of Solid-Mechanical Quantities (Chapter 8) Measuring Strain Measuring Displacement Measuring Linear Velocity

Slide 1. Temperatures Light (Optoelectronics) Magnetic Fields Strain Pressure Displacement and Rotation Acceleration Electronic Sensors

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall 2007

Transducers. Today: Electrostatic Capacitive. EEL5225: Principles of MEMS Transducers (Fall 2003) Instructor: Dr. Hui-Kai Xie

b. The displacement of the mass due to a constant acceleration a is x=

SENSORS and TRANSDUCERS

CHAPTER 4 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER BEAM ELECTROSTATIC ACTUATORS

EE C247B / ME C218 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DESIGN SPRING 2014 C. Nguyen PROBLEM SET #4

MEMS Tuning-Fork Gyroscope Mid-Term Report Amanda Bristow Travis Barton Stephen Nary

Optimizing the Performance of MEMS Electrostatic Comb Drive Actuator with Different Flexure Springs

An Accurate Model for Pull-in Voltage of Circular Diaphragm Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (CMUT)

MEAM 550 Modeling and Design of MEMS Spring Solution to homework #4

Piezoresistive Sensors

INF5490 RF MEMS. LN03: Modeling, design and analysis. Spring 2008, Oddvar Søråsen Department of Informatics, UoO

E05 Resonator Design

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall 2012

EECS C245 ME C218 Midterm Exam

EE C245 - ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall Today s Lecture

Design and Simulation of Comb Drive Capacitive Accelerometer by Using MEMS Intellisuite Design Tool

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design

Modelling of Different MEMS Pressure Sensors using COMSOL Multiphysics

Sensors, Signals and Noise 1 COURSE OUTLINE. Introduction Signals and Noise Filtering Sensors: Strain Gauges. Signal Recovery, 2017/2018 Strain Gauges

Design And Analysis of Microcantilevers Type Sensor With Different Shape of Piezoresistive Patch

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design

EE C247B / ME C218 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DESIGN SPRING 2016 C. NGUYEN PROBLEM SET #4

Comb Resonator Design (1)

EE C247B / ME C218 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DESIGN SPRING 2014 PROBLEM SET #1

Y. C. Lee. Micro-Scale Engineering I Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS)

FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES

10 Measurement of Acceleration, Vibration and Shock Transducers

PIEZOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY PRIMER

Strain Gages. Approximate Elastic Constants (from University Physics, Sears Zemansky, and Young, Reading, MA, Shear Modulus, (S) N/m 2

Strain Measurements. Isaac Choutapalli

Transduction Based on Changes in the Energy Stored in an Electrical Field

Institute for Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis Graz Centre for Electron Microscopy

MEMS Mechanical Fundamentals

Robotics Intelligent sensors (part 2)

Piezoresistive sensors

Transduction Based on Changes in the Energy Stored in an Electrical Field. Lecture 6-5. Department of Mechanical Engineering

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, VOL. 13, NO. 5, OCTOBER Sudipto K. De and N. R. Aluru, Member, IEEE, Associate Member, ASME

Game Physics. Game and Media Technology Master Program - Utrecht University. Dr. Nicolas Pronost

Learning Objectives By the end of this section, the student should be able to:

EE C247B ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Spring 2016

STRAIN GAUGES YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Sensors and Transducers. mywbut.com

Finite Element Analysis of Piezoelectric Cantilever

1 Force Sensing. Lecture Notes. 1.1 Load Cell. 1.2 Stress and Strain

Foundations of MEMS. Chang Liu. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science Northwestern University. International Edition Contributions by

Analytical Design of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based Piezoelectric Accelerometer for high g acceleration

CHAPTER 5 FIXED GUIDED BEAM ANALYSIS

Strain Gages. Approximate Elastic Constants (from University Physics, Sears Zemansky, and Young, Reading, MA, 1979

Contactless Excitation of MEMS Resonant Sensors by Electromagnetic Driving

1. Narrative Overview Questions

EE 5344 Introduction to MEMS CHAPTER 6 Mechanical Sensors. 1. Position Displacement x, θ 2. Velocity, speed Kinematic

Fundamental Theory and Design of Micro Pressure Sensor

Design of a MEMS Capacitive Comb-drive Accelerometer

Transduction Based on Changes in the Energy Stored in an Electrical Field

I. MEASUREMENT OF TEMPERATURE

EE C245 - ME C218. Fall 2003

Force and Displacement Measurement

Mechatronics II Laboratory EXPERIMENT #1: FORCE AND TORQUE SENSORS DC Motor Characteristics Dynamometer, Part I

ECE421: Electronics for Instrumentation MEP382: Design of Applied Measurement Systems Lecture #2: Transduction Mechanisms

Soft Bodies. Good approximation for hard ones. approximation breaks when objects break, or deform. Generalization: soft (deformable) bodies

The Pull-In of Symmetrically and Asymmetrically Driven Microstructures and the Use in DC Voltage References

Appendix A Glossary of Mathematical Symbols

STRESS, STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS

Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic Stress-Strain Relationship

Strain, Force, and Pressure

3.091 Introduction to Solid State Chemistry. Lecture Notes No. 5a ELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF SOLIDS

MCT151: Introduction to Mechatronics Lecture 10: Sensors & Transduction Mechanisms

Simulation based Analysis of Capacitive Pressure Sensor with COMSOL Multiphysics

Module 2 Mechanics of Machining. Version 2 ME IIT, Kharagpur

Post Graduate Diploma in Mechanical Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Physics 6b Winter 2015 Final Campagnari Section Test Form D

Physics 6b Winter 2015 Final Campagnari Section Test Form A

[5] Stress and Strain

MET 487 Instrumentation and Automatic Controls. Lecture 13 Sensors

Mechatronics II Laboratory EXPERIMENT #1 MOTOR CHARACTERISTICS FORCE/TORQUE SENSORS AND DYNAMOMETER PART 1

US06CPHY06 Instrumentation and Sensors UNIT 2 Part 2 Pressure Measurements

PY5020: Nanomechanics Nanoscience MEMS and NEMS

ENG/PHYS3320 Microsystems Technology Chapter 3 Mechanical Microsystems

INTRODUCTION TO PIEZO TRANSDUCERS

DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF ACCELEROMETER SPRINGS

ELECTRONIC SENSORS PREAMBLE. This note gives a brief introduction to sensors. The focus is. on sensor mechanisms. It describes in general terms how

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design

1.103 CIVIL ENGINEERING MATERIALS LABORATORY (1-2-3) Dr. J.T. Germaine Spring 2004 LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 6

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

CHAPTER THREE SYMMETRIC BENDING OF CIRCLE PLATES

EE C245 - ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall Today s Lecture

(Refer Slide Time: 1: 19)

December 1999 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Mar Mar 98

Transcription:

Midterm 2 PROBLEM POINTS MAX 1 30 2 24 3 15 4 45 5 36 1

Personally, I liked the University; they gave us money and facilities, we didn't have to produce anything. You've never been out of college. You don't know what it's like out there. I've worked in the private sector--they expect results. -Ghostbusters Problem 1 30 points a) Folded beams are often used to build MEMS sensors and actuators. Name two reasons why? 2 points Two out of: 1- They can accommodate intrinsic stress better 2- The have a large stiffness in the longitudinal direction of the support beams 3- They occupy a smaller area. b) In piezoresistive pressure sensors with a square diaphragm, four piezoresistors are usually used along the four sides of the square. Briefly explain why this is done instead of using two resistors along only two sides. 3 points Four resistors are used to form the popular Wheatsone bridge. All four resistors are parallel to one another, two are parallel with two of the diaphragm sides, and the other two are perpendicular to the other two diaphragm sides. This is done so that one pair of resistors undergoes longiudinal stress and the other transverse stress. If these are placed on a (100) plane along the <110> directions the resistance change in the two pairs will have almost eual magnitude but opposite signs. c) The ratio of stress to strain in a microstructure is given by (circle all that apply): a) shear modulus b) potential energy c) momentum d) Poisson's ratio e) Elastic modulus f) Bulk modulus 2 points d) What is the Poisson's ratio, briefly explain? 2 points Poisson's ratio relates the strain along a primary axis to that along a secondary axis. 2

e) Varying gap parallel-plate capacitors are often used for sensing applications. Name three shortcomings of this sensing mechanism? 5 points 1- Nonlinear 2- Susceptible to pull-in if the readout voltage becomes too large 3- Limited full-scale range for high-sensitivity devices f) As discussed in class, in order to support mechanical structures we use several different beam designs, including a cantilever beam, a bridge structure, folded beams, and crab leg beams. The crab leg support is sometimes used because (for the following assume the same beam length, width, and thickness for all designs): 4 points a) It is more flexible than a bridge structure b) It occupies less area than a bridge structure c) It can accommodate a larger intrinsic stress than a bridge structure d) It is less prone to stiction than a bridge structure g) Vertical comb actuators have a larger force for a given device area and gap distance compared with lateral comb actuators. Briefly explain when this is the case. 4 points The main reason is that the total perimeter area of vertical comb fingers where the force is generated is much larger than that of lateral combs. Therefore, for a given device area the force is much larger. 3

h) Name three advantages of capacitive pressure sensors over piezoresistive pressure sensors. 5 points 1- Higher normalized sensitivity 2- Lower power dissipation 3- Lower temperature sensitivity i) Capacitive transducers are referred to as "energy conserving" transducers, whereas piezoresistive transducers are not. Briefly explain why. 3 points The energy applied to capacitive transducers is stored in the capacitor as potential energy and is not dissipated. In ppiezoresistive transducers the energy is used up in the piezoresistors, and so these are not "energy conserving" transducers. 4

Freddy Shoop: They're as smart as you and me. Phil Gills: You and I. Freddy Shoop: All of us. -Summer School Problem 3 15 points The following figure shows the basic structure of a comb-driven actuator. Note that the device is supported by four beams in a bridge-type configuration. Make the following assumption for the rest of this problem: 1. Silicon material: moderately-doped silicon 2. Thickness: 10µm in all areas 3. Gap between fingers: 2µm 4. Finger Width: 5µm 5. Distance between mass and substrate: 10µm Now assume that the actuator is designed with the following dimensions: Each support beam is 200µm long and 3µm wide (note there are 4 beams altogether); The shuttle mass (the thick region in the middle) is 100µm wide (i.e. the distance between the two support beams is 100µm), and it is 1mm long; There are comb fingers along the entire length of the shuttle mass; The actuator is actuated by applying a DC voltage of 50V across one set of fingers; DRIVE COMB ELECTRODES ANCHOR TO SUBSTRATE METAL INTERCONNECTS SHUTTLE MASS SUPPORT BEAMS SUBSTRATE 7

a) Calculate the amount of force generated by the actuator to move the shuttle mass. There are about 1000/(5+5+2+2)=72=n fingers F = nεhv2 g 8μN b) Calculate the deflection of the device. 3 Ewt k = 4 = 23N / m 3 l F = kx x = 8 10 6 23 = 0.35μm c) In order to increase the maximum deflection of the device without increasing the thickness of the silicon, what design changes will you make? Provide short answers and explain briefly. To increase the deflection one needs to reduce the spring constant. This can be done by making the beams longer, or by using a folded beam structure. It is also possible to increase the force, which can be done by reducing the gap between fingers, or by increasing the number of fingers. (Increasing the voltage is not an acceptable answer since I asked for design changes). 8

Prince Humperdinck: Surrender! Westley: You mean you wish to surrender to me? Very well, I accept. -The Princess Bride Problem 4 45 points This problem deals with the capacitive pressure sensor shown in the figure on next page. This sensor has a special structure. Both the top and the cross-sectional view (A-A ) are shown in the figure. The sensor has two diaphragms, placed on top of each other as shown. The top diaphragm has a circular shape with a diameter of 2a and thickness hc. The bottom diaphragm has a square shape with a side length of 2a and thickness hs. The two diaphragms are separated by an air gap g as shown. Note that the air gap in between the two diaphragms is sealed and is not exposed to the external environment. The external environment has a pressure P above the pressure of the sealed gap, which is equally applied to both diaphragms. Both diaphragms are supported by an anchor as shown. Note that the top view of the structure (the drawing in the top of the figure) shows the diaphragms, and their support anchor. This picture also shows a portion of the top diaphragm removed in the upper left-hand corner to reveal the square diaphragm and its support anchor located below the circular diaphragm. 9

Part a 15 points We want to calculate the pressure sensitivity of this capacitive pressure sensor. That is we want to find an expression for the change in capacitance, C, between the two diaphragms (note that C is not shown here), as a function of change in pressure P. Find the pressure sensitivity C/ P as a function of device parameters given in the figure and the material properties of silicon. Note that for this problem you can assume that there is no stress in either diaphragm, that the Poisson s ratio ν is zero, and that one can assume the deflections of the diaphragms can be assumed small compared with the gap g. Please show all your work, and if you make any approximations please state them. For both diaphragms you can assume that the relationship between deflection, y, and Pressure difference, P, difference is given by: y = 3a4 P 16Eh 3 10

Part a We can write the capacitance of the device as a function of pressure as follows: εa C = c (g Total deflection) where A c is the area of the circle (since the circle has a smaller area. Now we need to find the total deflection. This is eqaul to the sum of the deflections from the square and the circular diaphragms. The deflection vs. pressure was given and so we have: P= 16Eh 3 3a 4 y Of course this is different for the circular and the square diaphragms : y c = 3a4 16Eh c 3 P = B cp for the circular diaphragm, and : y s = 3a 4 3 16Eh P = B sp for the square diaphragm. The B values are s simply constants used for convenience. The total deflection is: y t =y c +y s = B c P + B s P Now, the capacitance is given as: C= εa c εa = c g y t (g (B c + B s )P) We can now find the pressure sensitivity: ΔC ΔP = εa c (B c + B s ) (g (B c + B s )P) 2 εa c (B c + B s ) g 2 Note that this is larger the sensitivity obtained with a single diaphragm, and if the two diaphragms have the same thickness the sensitivity is almost doubled. Part b Find the effective spring constants of the circular (kc) and square (ks) diaphragms? 10 points F = kx= PA (where A is the area), and x is displacement. For the two diaphragms, we have : k c = PA c y c k s = PA s y s = 16Eh c 3.(πa 2 ) 3a 4 = 16πEhc 3 3a 2 = 16Eh s 3.(4a 2 ) 3a 4 = 64Eh 3 s 3a 2 11

Part c 20 points Now assume that a voltage V is applied between the two diaphragms. Derive an approximate expression for the pull-in voltage (This is the maximum voltage that can be applied between the two diaphragms before they will collapse) of this structure as a function of the spring constants of the two diaphragms. F= εa c V 2 2(g - y t ) 2...(1) We use the area of the circle here because it is smaller of the two. But the total deflection was calculated before as the sum of the deflection of each diaphragm. For the two diaphragms, we have : y t =y c +y s = F + F = F( 1 + 1 ) = F k c k s k c k s k e Where k e is the effective spring constant and is equal to : 1 = 1 + 1 k e k c k s So we can rewrite equation (1) as follows : F= εa cv 2 2(g - y t ) 2 =k e y t So we can rewrite this expression as : εa y t = c V 2 2k e (g - y t ) 2 ; or V = 2k e y t (g - y t ) εa c To find the pull - in voltage, take the derivative of V wrt. y t, set it equal to 0 and then find the value for gap when this happens. We have done this before and we found that the maximu mdeflection was equal to 1/3 of the gap : Max y t = 1 g; At this gap we had found the pull - in voltage to be : 3 V PI = 8k eg 3 27εA c Note that this expression is not any different than that found for a beam, but the main difference is that the spring constant value is different and is equal to the effective spring constant. This effective spring constant is smaller than the spring constant of either diaphragm. 12

It's been swell, but the swelling's gone down. -Tank Girl Problem 5 This problem deals with the piezoresistive accelerometer structure shown below. The accelerometer consists of a cube of silicon (side dimension of 1mm) that is supported using two beams as shown. Note that the entire structure is made of n-type silicon with a resistivity of 11.7 Ω-cm. Also, assume that the top surface of the mass cube (i.e., the xy plane) is the (100) plane of silicon. For the rest of this problem you can assume that you can measure the resistance of either of the two beams (i.e., section A-B, or section C-D), independently. Assume the following dimensions for the accelerometer: The side of the proof mass cube: 1mm Length of each beam, L = 10µm Width of each beam, w = 1µm Thickness of each beam, t = 1µm Density of Si = 2330 Kg/m 3 Young's Modulus of Si : 190 GPa (all directions) For parts (a), (b), and (c) assume that the support beams are oriented along the <100> direction of silicon on the (100) plane (i.e., the y-axis is along the <100> direction). z Anchor (Fixed) y W x Proof Mass A t B D Cube C Anchor (Fixed) Length=L 13

Part a 9 points Calculate the acceleration sensitivity ( R/ a, and assume that R is the resistance of one of the beams A-B, or C-D) for this accelerometer if an acceleration along the x-axis is applied to the device. Since the beam is under tension on one surface and under compression on the other, there will be no net change in resistance, so the acceleration sensitivity along the x-axis is zero. Part b 9 points Calculate the acceleration sensitivity ( R/ a, and assume that R is the resistance of one of the beams A-B, or C-D) for this accelerometer if an acceleration along the z-axis is applied to the device. Same as part (b), the total resistance change is always zero, so sensitivity is zero. Part c: 9 points Calculate the acceleration sensitivity ( R/ a, and assume that R is the resistance of one of the beams A-B, or C-D) for this accelerometer if an acceleration along the y-axis is applied to the device. A the mass moves in the y direction, one of the beams is axially compressed and the other is stretched. Calculate the axial force, from that calculate the stress, and then calculate the resistance change. For this part we are assuming that the beams are aligned to the <100> direction, so the piezoresistance coefficient of interest is π 11. For n- type silicon this is equal to -102.2x10-11 per Pa. Note that the stress in this case is only axial, since there is only an axial load applied. As acceleration is applied in the y direction, one of the beams undergoes compression, and the other one tension, so the resistance in one increases, while the resistance in the other decreases. 14

Here are the calculations: F = ma m = 10 9 2330 = 2.33 10 6 F Stress =σ = Beam cross section Area = F A R =π F l.σ =π l Area Δa =π mr l Area But : Re sistan ce= R =ρ L A Δa =π mρl l A 2 Since the beam is aligned to the <100 > direction, the longitudinal piezoresistance coefficient is simply π 11, and this is given above. So : Δa =π mρl l A 2 = 102.2 10 11. 2.33 10 6 11.7 0.01 10 10 6 10 24 = 2786 Ω /m/sec2 Δa Note that : R 0 = 1.17 MΩ, so: 2 = 0.24 %/ m /sec R.Δa 15

Part d 9 points Now assume that the support beams are oriented along the <110> direction of silicon. Calculate the acceleration sensitivity R/ a for acceleration along the y direction. Note that you are supposed to obtain a numerical answer for each part. All the information you need, such as relevant piezoresistor coefficients, etc., can be obtained from various sources you have available, like your textbook, etc. Make sure that you show your work. When the beams are aligned along the <110> direction, one has to use the longitudinal piezoresistance coefficient of silicon for that direction, which is a function of all of the primary piezoresistance coefficients, and so the new sensitivity is calculated as: Δa =π l mρl A 2 π l = 1 2 (π 11 +π 12 +π 44 ) For n type Si: π 11 = 102.2 10 11 π 12 =+53.4 10 11 π 44 = 13.6 10 11 π l = 62.4 10 11 = 1701 Ω /m / sec2 Δa Note that : R 0 = 1.17 MΩ, so: = 0.15 % /m / sec2 R.Δa 16