Mathematical Induction

Similar documents
Mathematical Induction Again

Mathematical Induction Again

Writing proofs for MATH 61CM, 61DM Week 1: basic logic, proof by contradiction, proof by induction

Antiderivatives! Outline. James K. Peterson. January 28, Antiderivatives. Simple Fractional Power Antiderivatives

Antiderivatives! James K. Peterson. January 28, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

The Derivative of a Function

Riemann Sums. Outline. James K. Peterson. September 15, Riemann Sums. Riemann Sums In MatLab

Project One: C Bump functions

CSC 344 Algorithms and Complexity. Proof by Mathematical Induction

Proofs Not Based On POMI

Derivatives and the Product Rule

Writing proofs for MATH 51H Section 2: Set theory, proofs of existential statements, proofs of uniqueness statements, proof by cases

Convergence of Sequences

Mathematical Induction. EECS 203: Discrete Mathematics Lecture 11 Spring

, p 1 < p 2 < < p l primes.

Proofs Not Based On POMI

Convergence of Sequences

Generating Function Notes , Fall 2005, Prof. Peter Shor

CS173 Strong Induction and Functions. Tandy Warnow

5.1 Simplifying Rational Expressions

Math101, Sections 2 and 3, Spring 2008 Review Sheet for Exam #2:

CS 124 Math Review Section January 29, 2018

Descriptive Statistics (And a little bit on rounding and significant digits)

Math Lecture 3 Notes

Wednesday, 10 September 2008

Outline. Wednesday, 10 September Schedule. Welcome to MA211. MA211 : Calculus, Part 1 Lecture 2: Sets and Functions

Week 2. Topic 4 Domain and Range

CISC-102 Fall 2017 Week 3. Principle of Mathematical Induction

Regression, part II. I. What does it all mean? A) Notice that so far all we ve done is math.

CS 2110: INDUCTION DISCUSSION TOPICS

This format is the result of tinkering with a mixed lecture format for 3 terms. As such, it is still a work in progress and we will discuss

Math 138: Introduction to solving systems of equations with matrices. The Concept of Balance for Systems of Equations

O.K. But what if the chicken didn t have access to a teleporter.

MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION

Section 4.2: Mathematical Induction 1

Why This Class? James K. Peterson. August 22, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

Techniques for Proof Writing

Geometric Series and the Ratio and Root Test

Section 4.6 Negative Exponents

Taylor Polynomials. James K. Peterson. Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing the sum of the first n integers:

MATH 22 FUNCTIONS: ORDER OF GROWTH. Lecture O: 10/21/2003. The old order changeth, yielding place to new. Tennyson, Idylls of the King

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

Quadratic Equations Part I

CS173 Lecture B, September 10, 2015

CSC236 Week 3. Larry Zhang

Big-oh stuff. You should know this definition by heart and be able to give it,

CSE373: Data Structures and Algorithms Lecture 2: Math Review; Algorithm Analysis. Hunter Zahn Summer 2016

MATH 341, Section 001 FALL 2014 Introduction to the Language and Practice of Mathematics

UNDERSTANDING FUNCTIONS

1.1 Administrative Stuff

We have been going places in the car of calculus for years, but this analysis course is about how the car actually works.

Algebra. Here are a couple of warnings to my students who may be here to get a copy of what happened on a day that you missed.

HOW TO WRITE PROOFS. Dr. Min Ru, University of Houston

Welcome to Physics 211! General Physics I

Derivatives and the Product Rule

= lim. (1 + h) 1 = lim. = lim. = lim = 1 2. lim

3.4 Complex Zeros and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Discrete Mathematics. Spring 2017

MATH 115, SUMMER 2012 LECTURE 12

Riemann Integration. James K. Peterson. February 2, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

TAYLOR POLYNOMIALS DARYL DEFORD

Newton s Cooling Model in Matlab and the Cooling Project!

Riemann Integration. Outline. James K. Peterson. February 2, Riemann Sums. Riemann Sums In MatLab. Graphing Riemann Sums

Basics of Proofs. 1 The Basics. 2 Proof Strategies. 2.1 Understand What s Going On

The First Derivative and Second Derivative Test

Integration by Parts Logarithms and More Riemann Sums!

The First Derivative and Second Derivative Test

Integer-Valued Polynomials

MATH 31B: BONUS PROBLEMS

Midterm Exam Solution

Differentiating Series of Functions

Worksheet Week 1 Review of Chapter 5, from Definition of integral to Substitution method

Math 90 Lecture Notes Chapter 1

CIS 2033 Lecture 5, Fall

MAT137 - Term 2, Week 2

Last Time. x + 3y = 6 x + 2y = 1. x + 3y = 6 y = 1. 2x + 4y = 8 x 2y = 1. x + 3y = 6 2x y = 7. Lecture 2

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations. Elizabeth Gillaspy. September 23, 2011

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

SECTION 7.4: PARTIAL FRACTIONS. These Examples deal with rational expressions in x, but the methods here extend to rational expressions in y, t, etc.

General Power Series

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 16: Review; Start Section 8. Elizabeth Gillaspy. October 18, Supplies needed: homework. Colored chalk. Quizzes!

Recitation 9: Probability Matrices and Real Symmetric Matrices. 3 Probability Matrices: Definitions and Examples

CHAPTER 1. FUNCTIONS 7

19. TAYLOR SERIES AND TECHNIQUES

Math 5a Reading Assignments for Sections

Basic Proof Techniques

Project Two. Outline. James K. Peterson. March 27, Cooling Models. Estimating the Cooling Rate k. Typical Cooling Project Matlab Session

Project Two. James K. Peterson. March 26, Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University

Section 20: Arrow Diagrams on the Integers

Lecture 17: Trees and Merge Sort 10:00 AM, Oct 15, 2018

What is proof? Lesson 1

course overview 18.06: Linear Algebra

Geometric Series and the Ratio and Root Test

MAT 1302B Mathematical Methods II

Proof Techniques (Review of Math 271)

Bolzano Weierstrass Theorems I

Solving systems of ODEs with Matlab

Induction 1 = 1(1+1) = 2(2+1) = 3(3+1) 2

Conjectures and proof. Book page 24-30

Transcription:

Mathematical Induction James K. Peterson Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University January 12, 2017 Outline Introduction to the Class Mathematical Induction

First, a few comments about this class. This class is about training you to think in a different way. MATH 4530 is about analysis and you will find the way we think about problems here is different than the way we handle problems in MATH 4120 which is about abstract algebra. Our job is to get you to think about the underpinnings of the material you have already mastered in calculus more abstractly and train you to really think through the consequences of assumptions. The basic outline of this course is Sequences of numbers Limits of functions Continuity and Differentiation of Functions Deeper ideas such as compactness Extremal Theory: minimum and maximum for functions Approximation Ideas using Taylor polynomials This class is organized like this 3 Exams and One Final which is cumulative and all have to take it. The days for the exams and the final are already set and you can t change those so make you travel plans accordingly. Usually HW is assigned every lecture Two projects which let you look at some topics in detail as well as train you how to write mathematics. Details Handwritten notes by me. You ll get used to my handwriting as it is the same stuff you see when I write on the board No textbook No blackboard type stuff: I ll assign HW via email after each Lecture. I take daily attendance and give you bonus points at the end.

Some words about studying HW is essential. I give about 2-4 exercises per lecture so that is about 80-160 exercises in all. In addition, there are two projects. All are designed to make you learn and to see how to think about things on your own. This takes time so do the work and be patient. I give 3 sample exams on the web site. You should do this to prepare for an exam: Study hard and then take sample exam 1 as a timed test for 60 minutes. You will know what you didn t get right and so you can figure out what to study. I don t give answers to these tests as this is stuff you should know. After studying again, take the second sample exam as a 60 minute timed exam and see how you did. Then study again to fill in the gaps. Take the third sample exam as a timed 60 minute exam. You should be able to do well and you are now prepared for the real exam. Mathematical Induction The Principle of Mathematical Induction For each natural number n, let P(n) be a statement or proposition about the numbers n. P(1) is true: This is called the BASIS STEP P(k + 1) is true when P(k) is true: This is called the INDUCTIVE STEP then we can conclude P(n) is true for all natural numbers n.

The natural numbers or counting numbers are usually denoted by the symbol N. The set of all integers, positive, negative and zero is denoted by Z and the real numbers is denoted by R or R. The phrase for all or for every is usually denoted by the symbol. The phrase there is or there exists, although we haven t gotten to using that phrase yet, is denoted by. There are many alternative versions of this. The Principle of Mathematical Induction For each natural number n, let P(n) be a statement or proposition about the numbers n. If If there is a number n0 so that P(n0) is true: BASIS STEP P(k + 1) is true when P(k) is true for all k n0: INDUCTIVE STEP then we can conclude P(n) is true for all natural numbers n n0.

The POMI Template State the Proposition Here : BASIS Verify P(1) is true INDUCTIVE Assume P(k) is true for arbitrary k and use that information to prove P(k + 1) is true. We have verified the inductive step. Hence, by the POMI, P(n) holds for all n. You must include this finishing statement as part of your proof and show the QED as above. QED QED is an abbreviation for the Latin Quod Erat Demonstratum or that which was to be shown. We often use the symbol instead of QED. The POMI Template So in outline, we have Proposition Statement Body : BASIS Verification INDUCTIVE Body of Argument Finishing Phrase QED or Note we try to use pleasing indentation strategies and white space to improve readability and understanding.

n! 2 n 1 n 1 BASIS : P(1) is the statement 1! 2 1 1 = 2 0 = 1 which is true. So the basis step is verified. INDUCTIVE : We assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary k > 1. We use k > 1 because in the basis step we found out the proposition holds for k = 1. Hence, we know Now look at P(k + 1). We note k! 2 k 1. (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! But, by the induction assumption, we know k! 2 k 1. Plugging this fact in, we have (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! (k + 1) 2 k 1. To finish, we note since k > 1, k + 1 > 2. Thus, we have the final step (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! (k + 1) 2 k 1 2 2 k 1 = 2 k. This is precisely the statement P(k + 1). Thus P(k + 1) is true and we have verifed the inductive step. Hence, by the POMI, P(n) holds for all n.

Let s change it a bit. n! 3 n 1 n 5 BASIS : P(5) is the statement 5! = 120 3 5 1 = 3 4 = 81 which is true. So the basis step is verified. INDUCTIVE : We assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary k > 5. We use k > 5 because in the basis step we found out the proposition holds for k = 5. Hence, we know Now look at P(k + 1). We note k! 3 k 1. (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! But, by the induction assumption, we know k! 3 k 1. Plugging this fact in, we have (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! (k + 1) 3 k 1. To finish, we note since k > 5, k + 1 > 6 > 3. Thus, we have the final step (k + 1)! = (k + 1) k! (k + 1) 3 k 1 3 3 k 1 = 3 k. This is precisely the statement P(k + 1). Thus P(k + 1) is true and we have verifed the inductive step. Hence, by the POMI, P(n) holds for all n 5. Note we use a different form of POMI here.

This one is a bit harder. 1 2 2 2 + 3 2 + ( 1) n+1 n 2 = 1 2 ( 1)n+1 n (n + 1) BASIS : P(1) is what we get when we plug in n = 1 here. This gives 1 2 on the left hand side and 1 2 ( 1)2 1(2) on the right hand side. We can see 1 = 1 here and so P(1) is true. INDUCTIVE : We assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary k > 1. Hence, we know 1 2 2 2 + 3 2 + ( 1) k+1 k 2 = 1 2 ( 1)k+1 k (k + 1) Now look at the left hand side of P(k + 1). We note at k + 1, we have the part that stops at k + 1 and a new term that stops at k + 2. We can write this as ( 1 2 2 2 + 3 2 + ( 1) k+1 k 2) + ( 1) k+2 (k + 1) 2. But the first part of this sum corresponds to the induction assumption or hypothesis. We plug this into the left hand side of P(k + 1) to get 1 2 ( 1)k+1 k (k + 1) + ( 1) k+2 (k + 1) 2. Now factor out the common ( 1) k+1 (k + 1) to get { } 1 ( 1) k+1 (k + 1) k (k + 1) = 1 2 2 ( 1)k+1 (k + 1) {k 2k 2}

The term k 2k 2 = k 2 and so bringing out another 1 and putting it into the ( 1) k+1, we have { } 1 ( 1) k+1 (k + 1) k (k + 1) = 1 2 2 ( 1)k+2 (k + 1)(k + 2) This is precisely the statement P(k + 1). Thus P(k + 1) is true and we have verifed the inductive step. Hence, by the POMI, P(n) holds for all n 5. This argument was a lot harder as we had to think hard about how to manipulate the left hand side. So remember, it can be tricky to see how to finish the induction part of the argument! Homework 1 Provide a careful proof of this proposition. There are also more worked out examples of POMI in the notes. So make sure you read through that material. 1.1 n! 4 n n 9