Physics 221A Fall 2005 Homework 8 Due Thursday, October 27, 2005

Similar documents
Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 12 Rotations in Quantum Mechanics, and Rotations of Spin- 1 2 Systems

Chapter 4: Polarization of light

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 9 Rotations in Ordinary Space

Nanoscale shift of the intensity distribution of dipole radiation

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in Quantum Mechanics and the Covariance of the Dirac Equation

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Light Waves and Polarization

CHAPTER 1. Polarisation

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Harmonic Oscillator. Robert B. Griffiths Version of 5 December Notation 1. 3 Position and Momentum Representations of Number Eigenstates 2

Linear algebra I Homework #1 due Thursday, Oct Show that the diagonals of a square are orthogonal to one another.

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review

Sommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 10 Rotations in Quantum Mechanics, and Rotations of Spin- 1 2 Systems

Physics Letters A 374 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Physics Letters A.

Introduction to relativistic quantum mechanics

Phys 531 Lecture 27 6 December 2005

Topic 2: The mathematical formalism and the standard way of thin

Physics 218 Polarization sum for massless spin-one particles Winter 2016

Lecture 21 Relevant sections in text: 3.1

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

Lecture 5: Polarization. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Outline

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

Electromagnetic Waves

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k

Introduction to Polarization

Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation

Introduction to Group Theory

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

conventions and notation

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

Homework 2. Solutions T =

Final Exam Practice Problems Answers Math 24 Winter 2012

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Jones vector & matrices

Physics 3323, Fall 2014 Problem Set 12 due Nov 21, 2014

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

A = 3 B = A 1 1 matrix is the same as a number or scalar, 3 = [3].

Consistent Histories. Chapter Chain Operators and Weights

Chap. 4. Electromagnetic Propagation in Anisotropic Media

Quarter wave plates and Jones calculus for optical system

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

by M.W. Evans, British Civil List (

Homework 3: Group Theory and the Quark Model Due February 16

1 Polarization of Light

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Rotations and Angular Momentum

Polarization Optics. N. Fressengeas

2.2 The spin states in the Stern-Gerlach experiment are analogous to the behavior of plane and circularly polarized light

Electromagnetic Theory (Hecht Ch. 3)

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM

Jones calculus for optical system

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 2017

QUANTUM MECHANICS I PHYS 516. Solutions to Problem Set # 5

APPENDIX E SPIN AND POLARIZATION

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories

KIPMU Set 1: CMB Statistics. Wayne Hu

Unitary Dynamics and Quantum Circuits

Physics 214 Midterm Exam Solutions Winter 2017

The groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations

OPERATORS IN QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL OPTICS

Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)

= a. a = Let us now study what is a? c ( a A a )

Notes on Group Theory Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Linear Representations

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

A VERY BRIEF LINEAR ALGEBRA REVIEW for MAP 5485 Introduction to Mathematical Biophysics Fall 2010

Section B. Electromagnetism

Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics

Matrix description of wave propagation and polarization

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

1 Dirac Notation for Vector Spaces

Particle Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Wigner s Little Groups

EXERCISES ON DETERMINANTS, EIGENVALUES AND EIGENVECTORS. 1. Determinants

Physics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 1

UE SPM-PHY-S Polarization Optics

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

Representation of the quantum and classical states of light carrying orbital angular momentum

QM1 Problem Set 1 solutions Mike Saelim

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Section 14.8 Thomson Scattering of Radiation

1 Algebra of State Vectors

The Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory

Transcription:

Physics 22A Fall 2005 Homework 8 Due Thursday, October 27, 2005 Reading Assignment: Sakurai pp. 56 74, 87 95, Notes 0, Notes.. The axis ˆn of a rotation R is a vector that is left invariant by the action of R, that is, it satisfies Rˆn = ˆn. Therefore ˆn is a real, normalized eigenvector of R with eigenvalue +. Prove that every (proper rotation has an axis. Show that the axis is unique (apart from the change in sign, ˆn ˆn as long as the angle of rotation is nonzero. This proof is the essential step in showing that every rotation can be expressed in axis-angle form. Do proper rotations in 4 dimensions have an axis? 2. Show that if R SO(3, then R(a b = (Ra (Rb. ( Hint: Use the fact that if M is any 3 3 matrix, then ɛ ijk det M = ɛ lmn M il M jm M kn. (2 This is essentially the definition of the determinant. This proves Eq. (9.36, and hence the adjoint formulas (9.32 and (9.34. 3. Show that every 2 2 matrix of the form, U = e iθˆn σ/2 (3 is an element of the group SU(2. Show that every element of the group SU(2 has the form (3 for some choice of θ, ˆn. This problem shows that the spin- 2 rotation operators can be identified with the group SU(2, and that there is no loss of generality in writing a spinor rotation in axis-angle form. 4. You are probably aware that the Pauli matrices combined with the 2 2 identity matrix span the space of 2 2 matrices, that is, an arbitrary 2 2 matrix A can be written in the form, A = a 0 I + a σ, (4

2 where (a 0, a are the (generally complex expansion coefficients. Notice that if A is Hermitian, then (a 0, a are real. Notice also that det A = a 2 0 a a. (5 It is convenient to write σ 0 = I, and to regard σ 0 as a fourth Pauli matrix. Then Eq. (4 becomes, 3 A = a µ σ µ. (6 µ=0 Notice that we have the orthogonality relation, tr(σ µ σ ν = 2δ µν, (7 which can be used to solve Eq. (6 for the expansion coefficients, a µ = 2 tr(σ µa. (8 Use these results to show that tr(ab = tr(σ µ A tr(σ µ B, (9 2 µ where A and B are 2 2 matrices. Use these results to prove Eq. (0.35, that is, R(U R(U 2 = R(U U 2, (0 where R(U is defined by Eq. (0.34. 5. Sakurai, problem 3.8, p. 243. Also write out the components of ˆn. This problem could also be done with SO(3 matrices, but it is a miserable calculation. This is a nice example of how many properties of SO(3 are easier to analyze in terms of the corresponding SU(2 matrices. 6. This problem concerns the polarization states of classical electromagnetic waves, which can be described by the same mathematical formalism used for spinors of spin- 2 particles. It is also provides a good background for the subject of the polarization states of photons, which we will take up later in the course. (a The spinor pointing in the ˆn direction was defined by Eq. (0.49. Show that every spinor points in some direction. For this, it is sufficient to show that for every normalized

3 spinor χ, χ σ χ is a unit vector. You can prove this directly, or use the formalism based on Eq. (9 above. This property only holds for spin- 2 particles. (b Consider now the phenomenon of polarization in classical electromagnetic theory. The most general physical electric field of a plane light wave of frequency ω travelling in the z-direction can be written in the form E phys (r, t = Re 2 ˆɛ µ E µ e i(kz ωt, ( µ= where µ =, 2 corresponds to x, y, where ˆɛ = ˆx, ˆɛ 2 = ŷ, and where E = E x and E 2 = E y are two complex amplitudes, and where ω = ck. Thus, the wave is parameterized by the two complex numbers, E x, E y. Often we are not interested in absolute amplitudes, only relative ones, so we normalize the wave by setting E x 2 + E y 2 = E 2 0, (2 for some suitably chosen reference amplitude E 0. This allows us to associate the wave with a normalized, 2-component complex spinor, according to χ = E 0 ( Ex E y. (3 Furthermore, we are often not interested in any overall phase of this spinor, since such an overall phase corresponds merely to a shift in the origin of time in Eq. (. This cannot be detected anyway in experiments that average over the rapid oscillations of the wave (a practical necessity at optical frequencies. If we normalize according to Eqs. (2 and (3 and ignore the overall phase, then the four real parameters originally inherent in (E x, E y are reduced to two, which describe the state of polarization of the wave. For example, the spinors ( ( 0 χ x =, χ 0 y =, (4 correspond to linear polarization in the x- and y-directions, respectively. Notice that polarization in the +x-direction is the same as that in the x-direction; they differ only by an overall phase. Similarly, the spinors χ r = (, χ 2 i l = (, (5 2 i correspond to right and left circular polarizations, respectively. Right circular polarization means the electric vector rotates in a clockwise direction in the x-y plane, tracing out a circle,

4 whereas in left circular polarization, the electric vector rotates counterclockwise. Sakurai says there is no uniformity in the literature about these conventions, and in fact he uses the opposite conventions for left and right circular polarizations; but the conventions I am quoting here are the ones used by Jackson and Born and Wolf, and I think most physicists use them. Right circular polarization corresponds to photons with negative helicity, and vice versa. In more general polarization states, the electric vector traces out an ellipse in the x-y plane; these are called elliptical polarizations. A limiting case of the ellipse is where the electric vector traces a line, back and forth; these are linear polarization states. In optics it is conventional to introduce the so-called Stokes parameters to describe the state of polarization. These are defined by s 0 = ( E x 2 + E y 2 /E0 2 =, s = ( E x 2 E y 2 /E0, 2 s 2 = 2 Re(E x E y /E2 0, s 3 = 2 Im(E x E y /E2 0. (6 (See Born and Wolf, Principles of Optics, p. 3. Show that these parameters satisfy s 2 + s 2 2 + s 2 3 =, (7 so that ŝ = (s, s 2, s 3 is a unit vector. The sphere upon which this unit vector lies is called the Poincaré sphere; points on this sphere correspond to polarization states. Notice that the Stokes parameters are independent of the overall phase of the wave, being bilinear in the field amplitudes (E x, E y. Indicate which points on the Poincaré sphere correspond to linear x- and y-polarization, and which to right and left circular polarization. What kind of polarization does the positive 2-axis in s-space correspond to? What about the negative 2-axis? (We will refer to directions in s-space by the indices,2,3, to avoid confusion with x, y, z in real space. (c Compute the expectation value χ σ χ = ˆn for the spinor (3, and relate the components of ˆn to the Stokes parameters. You will see that Stokes and Poincaré didn t exactly follow quantum mechanical conventions (since quantum mechanics had not yet been invented in their day, but the basic idea is that the point on the Poincaré sphere indicates the direction in which the spinor (3 is pointing. (d Now suppose we have a quarter-wave plate with its fast and slow axes in the x- and y-direction, respectively. This causes a relative phase shift in the x- and y-components of

5 the spinor (3 by π/2, that is, ( E x = E y ( e iπ/4 0 0 e iπ/4 ( Ex E y, (8 where the unprimed fields are those entering the quarter wave plate, and the primed ones are those exiting it. Show that the effect of the quarter wave plate on an incoming polarization state, as represented by a point on the Poincaré sphere, can be represented by a rotation in s-space. Find the 3 3 rotation matrix such that ŝ = Rŝ. Use this picture to determine the effect of the quarter wave plate on linear x- and y- polarizations, and on right and left circular polarizations. What polarization must we feed into the quarter wave plate to get right circular polarization coming out?