Effective dynamics of many-particle systems with dynamical constraint

Similar documents
Multiscale Analysis of Many Particle Systems with Dynamical Control

Kramers formula for chemical reactions in the context of Wasserstein gradient flows. Michael Herrmann. Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND CHAOS. Numerical integration. Stability analysis

MMJ1153 COMPUTATIONAL METHOD IN SOLID MECHANICS PRELIMINARIES TO FEM

6.4 graphs OF logarithmic FUnCTIOnS

Exponential and Logarithmic Functions

Local Phase Portrait of Nonlinear Systems Near Equilibria

lim a, where and x is any real number. Exponential Function: Has the form y Graph y = 2 x Graph y = -2 x Graph y = Graph y = 2

Chapter 8 Notes SN AA U2C8

Homework 3 due Friday, April 26. A couple of examples where the averaging principle from last time can be done analytically.

Introduction to Differential Equations. National Chiao Tung University Chun-Jen Tsai 9/14/2011

One-Dimensional Dynamics

Bifurcations of the Controlled Escape Equation

* τσ σκ. Supporting Text. A. Stability Analysis of System 2

Engineering Mathematics I

Handout for Adequacy of Solutions Chapter SET ONE The solution to Make a small change in the right hand side vector of the equations

11 Lecture 11: How to manipulate partial derivatives

1.1 The Equations of Motion

7. Kinetics controlled by fluctuations: Kramers theory of activated processes

Chapter Adequacy of Solutions

Initial Value Problems for. Ordinary Differential Equations

Ala-Arg-Pro-Tyr-Asn-Phe-Cpa-Leu-NH 2

Kwang-Je Kim University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory. MUTAC Review Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory October 18-19, 2001

The Boltzmann Equation and Its Applications

UNSTEADY LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW PAST TWO ROTATING CIRCULAR CYLINDERS BY A VORTEX METHOD

of the Schnakenberg model

UNCORRECTED SAMPLE PAGES. 3Quadratics. Chapter 3. Objectives

3 Biopolymers Uncorrelated chains - Freely jointed chain model

Methods of plasma description Particle motion in external fields

Nonlinear Systems Examples Sheet: Solutions

Stochastic Particle Methods for Rarefied Gases

Modelling of dynamics of mechanical systems with regard for constraint stabilization

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL STUDIES MATHEMATICS FOR PART I ENGINEERING. Lectures AB = BA = I,

Law of Sines, Law of Cosines, Heron s Formula:

3.1 Exponential Functions and Their Graphs

INSTRUCTOR S SOLUTIONS MANUAL SECTION 17.1 (PAGE 902)

M445: Heat equation with sources

NPTEL

Lecture 2: Separable Ordinary Differential Equations

1.6 CONTINUITY OF TRIGONOMETRIC, EXPONENTIAL, AND INVERSE FUNCTIONS

STOCHASTIC CHEMICAL KINETICS

OA = 6, 5, 4 2, 7, 1 = 4, 12, 3 AB, AC, and = 5, 3, 3 3, 4, 12 = = 39 = 39. AC, AD) = = 3 AC) AC) AD

Mathematics of Climate Seminar 9/19/2017

Algebra(2(Honors( Summer(Packet( ( ( Work(on(this(packet(during(the(summer.( ( ( There(will(be(an(in=class(quiz(on(the(material(the(

First Order Equations

Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

The Form of Swarms: A Primer of Swarm Equilibria

CSE 546 Midterm Exam, Fall 2014

Session 1: Probability and Markov chains

Handbook of Stochastic Methods

6. Vector Random Variables

Handbook of Stochastic Methods

INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.other] 5 Jun 2004

THREE-BODY INTERACTIONS DRIVE THE TRANSITION TO POLAR ORDER IN A SIMPLE FLOCKING MODEL

New approach to study the van der Pol equation for large damping

MIDTERM 1 PRACTICE PROBLEM SOLUTIONS

TOPICS IN HOMOGENIZATION OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 7

Diffusion of tagged particles in a crowded medium: supplementary material. Paper submitted to Europhys. Lett.

Gaussian Process Approximations of Stochastic Differential Equations

Laboratory and Rotating frames

Broken Extremals. Variational Methods & Optimal Control lecture 20. Broken extremals. Broken extremals

A RESCALING VELOCITY METHOD FOR DISSIPATIVE KINETIC EQUATIONS APPLICATIONS TO GRANULAR MEDIA

f 0 ab a b: base f

A HAND-HELD SENSOR FOR LOCAL MEASUREMENT OF MAGNETIC FIELD, INDUCTION AND ENERGY LOSSES

Periodic Structures in FDTD

UNIT 4 HEAT TRANSFER BY CONVECTION

Two recent works on molecular systems out of equilibrium

A NEW CHAOTIC ATTRACTOR FROM 2D DISCRETE MAPPING VIA BORDER-COLLISION PERIOD-DOUBLING SCENARIO

is on the graph of y = f 1 (x).

SPS Mathematical Methods

Reading: Electrostatics 3. Key concepts: Capacitance, energy storage, dielectrics, energy in the E-field.

Fourier Analysis Fourier Series C H A P T E R 1 1

10 Back to planar nonlinear systems

A Direct Derivation of the Griffith-Irwin Relationship using a Crack tip Unloading Stress Wave Model.

6. The braking distance (in feet) for a car traveling 50 miles per hour on a wet uphill road is given by

ab is shifted horizontally by h units. ab is shifted vertically by k units.

Limit Cycles II. Prof. Ned Wingreen MOL 410/510. How to prove a closed orbit exists?

Mathematics of Our Ice Dependent World

V (r,t) = i ˆ u( x, y,z,t) + ˆ j v( x, y,z,t) + k ˆ w( x, y, z,t)

Deep Relaxation: PDEs for optimizing Deep Neural Networks

2 Three Dimensional Finite Volume Gas-Kinetic Schemes

Research Article Chaotic Attractor Generation via a Simple Linear Time-Varying System

Subband Coding and Wavelets. National Chiao Tung University Chun-Jen Tsai 12/04/2014

Melting of Ultrathin Lubricant Film Due to Dissipative Heating of Friction Surfaces

Control Theory in Physics and other Fields of Science

Higher Order Linear Equations

BASE VECTORS FOR SOLVING OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

High-Order Asymptotic-Preserving Projective Integration Schemes for Kinetic Equations

KEY IDEAS. Chapter 1 Function Transformations. 1.1 Horizontal and Vertical Translations Pre-Calculus 12 Student Workbook MHR 1

Second-Order Linear Differential Equations C 2

Chapter 4 Page 1 of 16. Lecture Guide. Math College Algebra Chapter 4. to accompany. College Algebra by Julie Miller

CONSERVATION LAWS AND CONSERVED QUANTITIES FOR LAMINAR RADIAL JETS WITH SWIRL

PHYSICAL REVIEW E 78, Lattice Boltzmann method for simulation of compressible flows on standard lattices

STOCHASTIC PROCESSES IN PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY

Simulation of Coulomb Collisions in Plasma Accelerators for Space Applications

Disordered Solids. real crystals spin glass. glasses. Grenoble

σ = Eα(T T C PROBLEM #1.1 (4 + 4 points, no partial credit)

3.1 Graphing Quadratic Functions. Quadratic functions are of the form.

Transcription:

Michael Herrmann Effective dnamics of man-particle sstems with dnamical constraint joint work with Barbara Niethammer and Juan J.L. Velázquez Workshop From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012

Contents Man-particle storage sstems Modelling (thermodnamics group at WIAS) Nonlocal Fokker-Planck equations with two small parameters Asmptotic Analsis (this talk) Effective ODEs for small parameter limits Fast reaction regime via Kramers formula for large deviations Slow reaction regime via regular transport and singular events From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 2

Man-particle storage sstems 1. Interconnected rubber balloons pictures taken b Clemens Guhlke (WIAS) 2. Lithium-ion batteries Ke features cathode e FePO 4 FePO 4 machine Li + e anode fast relaation to local equilibrium free energ of single-particle sstem is double-well potential moment of the man-particle sstem is controlled (dnamical constraint) FePO 4 electrolte From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 3

First guess for model H() simple gradient flow dnamical constraint nonlocal multiplier ẋ i (t) = (t) H 0 i (t) N N 1 X i=1 (t) =N 1 i (t) =`(t) X N i=1 H 0 i (t) + `(t) Problem Macroscopic evolution is ill-posed! Remed Take into account entropic effects! Quenched Disorder Mielke & Truskinovsk (ARMA 2012) Boltzmann Entrop non-local Fokker-Planck eqautions From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 4

Nonlocal Fokker-Planck equations more details in Dreer, Guhlke, Herrmann (CMAT 2011) relaation time entrop dnamical multiplier Z @ t % = @ 2 @ % + H 0 () (t) % R %(, t)d = `(t) dnamical constraint Z = X + (t) = R H 0 ()%(, t)d + `(t) = X = X 0 stable interval unstable interval stable interval From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 5

3 Time scales @ t % = @ 2 @ % + H 0 () (t) % Goal Understand small parameter dnamics!,! 0 Different times scales: relaation time of single particle sstem (relaation to metastable state) 4H chemical reactions (Kramers formula) (relaation to equilibrium) ep 2 dnamical constraint ` = O(1) From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 6

Overview on different scaling regimes

Simple initial value problems simplifing assumptions ` >0 `(0) <, %(, 0) `(0) () macroscopic output t 7! `(t), (t), stress-strain relation Z t 7! `(t),µ(t) phase-fraction - strain relation mean force (t) = H 0 ()%(, t)d RZ 0 = (t) ` Z +1 phase fraction µ(t) = 1 %(, t)d + 0 %(, t)d From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 8

Numerical simulations - macroscopic view slow A t = 1. n = 0.05 B t = 0.5 n = 0.05 C t = 0.25 n = 0.05 reactions Tpe I Tpe II D t = 0.1 n = 0.05 E t = 0.05 n = 0.05 F t = 0.001 n = 0.05 fast reactions G t = 0.001 n = 0.2 H t = 0.00001 n = 0.2 I t = 0.0001 n = 0.4 Tpe III Tpe IV From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 9

Numerical simulations - microscopic view A A t = 1. n = 0.05 { = -0.8 A { = -0.0 A { = 0.8 C C t = 0.25 n = 0.05 { = -0.8 C { = 0.9 C { = 1.7 G G t = 0.001 n = 0.2 { = -1.6 G { = -0.0 G { = 1.6 From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 10

Scaling regimes for parameters,! 0 single-peak evolution = a log 1/ 0 <a<a crit piecewise continuous two-peaks evolution = p 0 <p<2/3 open problem = p 2/3 <p<1 limit of Kramers formula b =ep 2, 0 <b<b crit Kramers formula 2 log 1/!1 quasi-stationar limit From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 11

Kramers formula and Tpe-II transitions =ep b 2

Kramers formula H () =H() particles can cross the energ barrier h h + due to stochastic fluctuations (large deviations, tunneling) 0 + Kramers formula provides mass flu between wells time scale = ep +4H 2 = ep min{h,h+ } 2 Observation =ep( b/ 2 ) For there eists, such that b (1) mass flu is of order 1 provided that (t) = b + 2 (t) (2) small fluctuations of are sufficient to satisf the constraint From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 13

Inner and outer epansions Idea (1) for each we have three positions with, 0, + H 0 ( /0/+ )= m ± (t) (2) two narrow peaks with masses at ± (t) m (t) m + (t) inner epansion outer epansion mass flu due to Kramers 2 @ % + H 0 0 for ± (t) ()% = (t), (outer epansion) R(t) for 0 (t). (inner epansion) From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 14

Matching of inner and outer epansions Outer epansion 8 >< H (t) () %(, t) >: µ (t)ep 2 H (t) () for < 0 (t), µ + (t)ep 2 for > 0 (t). Z ±1 H (t) ( ± (t)) m ± (t) =± 0 (t) %(, t)d c ± (t)µ ± (t) ep 2 Inner epansion % 0 (t) ±, t ep H (t) 0 (t) ± 2 C(t) R(t) 2 ep H (t) 0 (t) 2! Matching conditions result from equating the time-dependent pre-factors! From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 15

Kramers formula for mass flu R(t) = m (t)r (t) m + (t)r + (t) r ± (t) =c ± (t)ep b h ± (t) =H (t) ( 0 (t)) h± (t) 2 H (t) ( ± (t)) Observation For each there eists such that (t) < b =) r (t) 1 (t) = b + 2 (t) =) r (t) ep( (t)) (t) > b =) r (t) 1 Strateg Adjust according to dnamical constraint From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 16

Main result for fast reactions F t = 0.001 n = 0.05 Main result. Suppose that the dnamical constraint and the initial data satisfies (4) and (5), and that and are coupled b b =ep 2 (11) for some constant b (0, h crit ). Then there eists a constant b (0, ) such that 1. the dnamical multiplier satisfies G t = 0.001 n = 0.2 (t) 0 H (t) for t<t 1, b for t 2 <t<t 2, H (t) for t>t 2 where t 1 and t 2 are uniquel determined b (t 1 )=X ( b ) and (t 2 )=X + ( b ), 2. the state of the sstem satisfies (, t) 0 m (t) X ( (t)) ()+m + (t) X+ ( (t))(). H t = 0.00001 n = 0.2 where m + (t) =1 m (t) and 1 for t<t 1, X + ( b ) (t) m (t) = X + ( b ) X ( b ) for t 1 <t<t 2, 0 for t>t 2. Moreover, the assertions remain true 1. with b =0if ep hcrit 2, 2. with b = if 2 3 but > ep b2 for all b>0. From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 17

Slow reaction limit: Tpe-I/II transitions =ep a

Overview - states for increasing constraints Single-peak configurations stable unstable stable Two-peaks configurations transport due to constraint switching events splitting events stable-stable unstable-stable merging events From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 19

Overview - Tpe-I phase transitions transport switching transport merging transport From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 20

Overview - Tpe-II phase transitions transport switching transport transport splitting merging transport switching transport From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 21

Overview - Simplified models transport localised peaks move due to the constraint switching two-peaks ODE stable peaks enter unstable interval merging unstable peaks merge rapidl with stables ones splitting unstable peaks split rapidl into two stables ones peak-widening model mass-splitting problem From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 22

two-peaks approimation transport, switching, and merging of peaks

Two-peaks approimation to FP Dnamical model ẋ 1 = H 0 ( 1 ) ẋ 2 = H 0 ( 2 ) m 1 + m 2 =1 ṁ i =0 = m 1 H 0 ( 1 )+m 2 H 0 ( 2 )+ ` Quasi-stationar limit! 0 H 0 ( 1 )=H 0 ( 2 ) m 1 1 + m 2 2 = ` Multiple solution branches! Which ones are selected b dnamics? From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 24

Two-peaks approimation to FP + + 2 (t) switching A (t) C 2 A B m 1 1 + m 2 2 = (t 2 ) 1 = 2 t t 0 t 1 B t 2 1 (t) merging H 0 ( 1 )=H 0 ( 2 ) m 1 1 + m 2 2 = `(t 0 ) 0 C 1 From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012

entropic effects widening and splitting of unstable peaks peak-widening model: width of unstable peaks blows up (almost) instantaneousl, determines splitting time mass splitting problem: sstem forms (almost) instantaneousl two stable peaks determines jump of the sstem

Peak-widening model % = m 1 ˆ% + m 2 2 @ t ˆ% = @ 2 @ ˆ% + H 0 () ˆ% 2 = H 0 ( 2 ) Z = m 1 RR H0 1 H 0 ()ˆ%d + m ()ˆ% d + m 1 H 0 ( 2 H 0 2 )+ 2 + ` ` R ` = m 1 RR ˆ% d + m 2 2 position of peak ẋ 1 = H 0 ( 1 ) width of peak w(t) = (t)w (t) ˆ%(, t) =: 1 (t) R ( 1 t) (t) 2, (t)! From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 27

Formula for width of unstable peaks define scaling factors epand nonlinearit (fine if width is small) w(t) 1 =) @ R = @ 2 R as long as width is small 1 =) R(, ) 1 p 4 ep 2 4,W( ) p evolution of width 0 <t<t sw : w(t) =O( ) t sw <t<t sp : w(t) 1 t sp <t : w(t) 1 Z tsp t sw H 00 1 (t) dt + a =0 can be computed b quasi-stationar two-peaks approimation From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 28

Mass splitting problem ansatz =0, t = t sp + s @ s ˆ% = @ H 0 () (s) ˆ% l(s) = const = l(t sp ) ẋ 2 = (s) H 0 ( 2 ) Z (s) =m 1 H 0 ()ˆ% d + m 2 H 0 ( 2 ) R asmptotic initial data ˆ%(, s) s! 1! 1 2 p ep 1 (t sw ) 4ep(2 s), = H 00 1 (t sw ) > 0 From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 29

Mass splitting problem Conjecture s =+1 s = 1 Data at depend continuousl on data at. Mass Splitting Function (m 1,m 2 ) 7! (µm 1,m 2 +(1 µ)m 1 ) µ = M(`, m 1 ) data just before splitting data just after splitting From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 30

Main result for slow reactions initial data A t = 1. n = 0.05 < stable transport (in ) switching: t = t switching stable-stable transport switching: t = t switching C t = 0.25 n = 0.05 unstable transport mass splitting problem mass update: m i = m i + [m i ] unstable-stable transport splitting: t = t splitting E t = 0.05 n = 0.05 trivial merging: t = t merging >+ stable transport (in ) merging: t = t merging final data From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012 31

Summar Fast reaction regime Kramers formula describes Tpe-II transitions Tpe-I transitions as limiting case Slow reaction regime Tpe-I and Tpe-II transitions can be described b - intervals of quasi-stationar transport - singular times corresponding to switching, splitting, merging Splitting events require to solve Mass Splitting Problem Open problems Find rigorous proofs! Fill the gap in the scaling regimes! From particle sstems to differential equations WIAS Berlin, 21 Februar 2012

Thank ou for listening!