Stark-Heegner Points

Similar documents
Laval University, Québec September 2010

Stark-Heegner points

Iterated integrals, diagonal cycles and rational points on elliptic curves

p-adic iterated integrals, modular forms of weight one, and Stark-Heegner points.

Rational points on elliptic curves. cycles on modular varieties

p-adic iterated integrals and rational points on curves

The complexity of Diophantine equations

Darmon points for fields of mixed signature

Independence of Heegner Points Joseph H. Silverman (Joint work with Michael Rosen)

Book of abstracts. Recent Developments on the Arithmetic of Special Values of L-functions 11/12/ /12/2017

BSD and the Gross-Zagier Formula

Modularity of Abelian Varieties

Wiles theorem and the arithmetic of elliptic curves

Verification of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture for Specific Elliptic Curves

L-functions and Arithmetic. Conference Program. Title: On the conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer for elliptic curves with complex multiplication

Stark Heegner points and special values of L-series

Abstracts of papers. Amod Agashe

The arithmetic of elliptic curves An update. Benedict H. Gross. In 1974, John Tate published The arithmetic of elliptic curves in

THE BIRCH AND SWINNERTON-DYER CONJECTURE FOR Q-CURVES AND ODA S PERIOD RELATIONS. To Takayuki Oda on his 60th birthday.

CHUNG PANG MOK. The correct form of Proposition 2.2 of [M1] should be stated as follows:

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem

Up to twist, there are only finitely many potentially p-ordinary abelian varieties over. conductor

Galois Representations

Triple product p-adic L-functions for balanced weights and arithmetic properties

The Birch & Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. Karl Rubin MSRI, January

Traces of rationality of Darmon points

Some remarks on signs in functional equations. Benedict H. Gross. Let k be a number field, and let M be a pure motive of weight n over k.

Problems on Growth of Hecke fields

THE ARITHMETIC OF ELLIPTIC CURVES AN UPDATE

Elliptic curves and modularity

Euler Systems Lecture in Lausanne: A tamely ramified variant of a conjecture of Perrin-Riou

Topological and arithmetic intersection numbers attached to real quadratic cycles

Elliptic Curves and Analogies Between Number Fields and Function Fields

Modern Number Theory: Rank of Elliptic Curves

Non CM p-adic analytic families of modular forms

OVERCONVERGENT GENERALISED EIGENFORMS OF WEIGHT ONE AND CLASS FIELDS OF REAL QUADRATIC FIELDS

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

The j-function, the golden ratio, and rigid meromorphic cocycles

Numerical Computation of Stark Hegner points in higher level

MA 162B LECTURE NOTES: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26

STARK POINTS AND p-adic ITERATED INTEGRALS ATTACHED TO MODULAR FORMS OF WEIGHT ONE

CHOW-HEEGNER POINTS ON CM ELLIPTIC CURVES AND VALUES OF p-adic L-FUNCTIONS

STARK POINTS AND p-adic ITERATED INTEGRALS ATTACHED TO MODULAR FORMS OF WEIGHT ONE

Overview. exp(2πiq(x)z) x Z m

( files chap2 to chap

GROSS-STARK UNITS AND p-adic ITERATED INTEGRALS ATTACHED TO MODULAR FORMS OF WEIGHT ONE

Tables of elliptic curves over number fields

The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for Q-curves and Oda s period relations

Heegner points, Stark Heegner points, and values of L-series

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 15 Mar 2012

MATH G9906 RESEARCH SEMINAR IN NUMBER THEORY (SPRING 2014) LECTURE 1 (FEBRUARY 7, 2014) ERIC URBAN

Rank-one Twists of a Certain Elliptic Curve

On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms

Workshop on Serre s Modularity Conjecture: the level one case

Hecke fields and its growth

The Sato-Tate conjecture for abelian varieties

Cusp forms and the Eichler-Shimura relation

TATE CONJECTURES FOR HILBERT MODULAR SURFACES. V. Kumar Murty University of Toronto

Equations for Hilbert modular surfaces

Endomorphism algebras of semistable abelian varieties over Q of GL(2)-type

Visibility and the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for analytic rank one

SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)

Hecke Operators for Arithmetic Groups via Cell Complexes. Mark McConnell. Center for Communications Research, Princeton

ON TRIVIAL p-adic ZEROES FOR ELLIPTIC CURVES OVER KUMMER EXTENSIONS. Daniel Delbourgo (Received 30 October, 2014)

Galois groups with restricted ramification

The Arithmetic of Noncongruence Modular Forms. Winnie Li. Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A. and National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taiwan

NUNO FREITAS AND ALAIN KRAUS

Computing Hilbert modular forms

Don Zagier s work on singular moduli

What is the Langlands program all about?

Computing the image of Galois

A COMPUTATION OF MODULAR FORMS OF WEIGHT ONE AND SMALL LEVEL

Pseudo-Modularity and Iwasawa Theory

Computer methods for Hilbert modular forms

l-adic Representations

HARUZO HIDA. on the inertia I p for the p-adic cyclotomic character N ordered from top to bottom as a 1 a 2 0 a d. Thus. a 2 0 N. ( N a 1.

CHOW-HEEGNER POINTS ON CM ELLIPTIC CURVES AND VALUES OF p-adic L-FUNCTIONS

Height pairings on Hilbert modular varieties: quartic CM points

Class groups and Galois representations

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 25 Nov 2015

Congruent number problem

FORMAL GROUPS OF CERTAIN Q-CURVES OVER QUADRATIC FIELDS

A Proof of the Full Shimura-Taniyama-Weil Conjecture Is Announced

Lecture 4: Examples of automorphic forms on the unitary group U(3)

PAlmetto Number Theory Series

1 Intro and History. 2 Ingredients. Stark's Conjecture Talk notes. Motivating example: = ln(1 + 2)

EXTENSIONS AND THE EXCEPTIONAL ZERO OF THE ADJOINT SQUARE L-FUNCTIONS

The GL 2 main conjecture for elliptic curves without complex multiplication. by Otmar Venjakob

The Asymptotic Fermat Conjecture

Galois Representations

On the generalized Fermat equation x 2l + y 2m = z p

Recent Work on Serre s Conjectures

Critical p-adic L-functions and applications to CM forms Goa, India. August 16, 2010

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

Mod p Galois representations attached to modular forms

HILBERT MODULAR FORMS: MOD P AND P-ADIC ASPECTS

Diophantine equations and semistable elliptic curves over totally real fields

On the arithmetic of modular forms

Twisted L-Functions and Complex Multiplication

EKNATH GHATE AND VINAYAK VATSAL. 1. Introduction

Transcription:

Stark-Heegner Points Henri Darmon and Victor Rotger... Second Lecture... Arizona Winter School Tucson, Arizona March 2011

Summary of the first lecture Victor described variants of the Heegner point construction based on higher dimensional algebraic cycles: the so-called Chow-Heegner points. Our last two lectures, and the student projects will focus exclusively on Chow-Heegner points attached to diagonal cycles on triple products of modular curves and Kuga-Sato varieties. Goal of this morning s lecture: indicate how these ostensibly very special constructions fit into the broader landscape of Stark-Heegner points.

Summary of the first lecture Victor described variants of the Heegner point construction based on higher dimensional algebraic cycles: the so-called Chow-Heegner points. Our last two lectures, and the student projects will focus exclusively on Chow-Heegner points attached to diagonal cycles on triple products of modular curves and Kuga-Sato varieties. Goal of this morning s lecture: indicate how these ostensibly very special constructions fit into the broader landscape of Stark-Heegner points.

Summary of the first lecture Victor described variants of the Heegner point construction based on higher dimensional algebraic cycles: the so-called Chow-Heegner points. Our last two lectures, and the student projects will focus exclusively on Chow-Heegner points attached to diagonal cycles on triple products of modular curves and Kuga-Sato varieties. Goal of this morning s lecture: indicate how these ostensibly very special constructions fit into the broader landscape of Stark-Heegner points.

... otherwise the les experienced participants might feel like the protagonists in the tale of the elephant and the six blind men!

What is a Stark-Heegner point? Executive summary: Stark-Heegner points are points on elliptic curves arising from (not necessarily algebraic) cycles on modular varieties.

What is a Stark-Heegner point? Executive summary: Stark-Heegner points are points on elliptic curves arising from (not necessarily algebraic) cycles on modular varieties.

A prototypical example: points arising from ATR cycles Motivation. Thanks to Heegner points, we know: ord s=1 L(E, s) 1 = rank(e(q)) = ord s=1 L(E, s), for all elliptic curves E/Q. (Gross-Zagier, Kolyvagin.) By work of Zhang and his school, exploiting Heegner points on Shimura curves, similar results are known for many elliptic curves over totally real fields... but not for all of them!!

A prototypical example: points arising from ATR cycles Motivation. Thanks to Heegner points, we know: ord s=1 L(E, s) 1 = rank(e(q)) = ord s=1 L(E, s), for all elliptic curves E/Q. (Gross-Zagier, Kolyvagin.) By work of Zhang and his school, exploiting Heegner points on Shimura curves, similar results are known for many elliptic curves over totally real fields... but not for all of them!!

A prototypical example: points arising from ATR cycles Motivation. Thanks to Heegner points, we know: ord s=1 L(E, s) 1 = rank(e(q)) = ord s=1 L(E, s), for all elliptic curves E/Q. (Gross-Zagier, Kolyvagin.) By work of Zhang and his school, exploiting Heegner points on Shimura curves, similar results are known for many elliptic curves over totally real fields... but not for all of them!!

The mysterious elliptic curves F = a real quadratic field; E = elliptic curve of conductor 1 over F ; χ : Gal(K/F ) ±1 = quadratic character of F. Question: Show that ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s).

The mysterious elliptic curves F = a real quadratic field; E = elliptic curve of conductor 1 over F ; χ : Gal(K/F ) ±1 = quadratic character of F. Question: Show that ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s).

The mysterious elliptic curves Theorem (Matteo Longo) L(E/F, χ, 1) 0 = #E χ (F ) <. Yu Zhao s PhD thesis (defended March 10, 2011): Theorem (Rotger, Zhao, D) If E is a Q-curve, i.e., is isogenous to its Galois conjugate, then ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) = 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = 1. We have no idea how to produce a point on E χ (F ) in general! Logan, D, (2003): We can nonetheless propose a conjectural formula to compute it in practice, via ATR cycles.

The mysterious elliptic curves Theorem (Matteo Longo) L(E/F, χ, 1) 0 = #E χ (F ) <. Yu Zhao s PhD thesis (defended March 10, 2011): Theorem (Rotger, Zhao, D) If E is a Q-curve, i.e., is isogenous to its Galois conjugate, then ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) = 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = 1. We have no idea how to produce a point on E χ (F ) in general! Logan, D, (2003): We can nonetheless propose a conjectural formula to compute it in practice, via ATR cycles.

The mysterious elliptic curves Theorem (Matteo Longo) L(E/F, χ, 1) 0 = #E χ (F ) <. Yu Zhao s PhD thesis (defended March 10, 2011): Theorem (Rotger, Zhao, D) If E is a Q-curve, i.e., is isogenous to its Galois conjugate, then ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) = 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = 1. We have no idea how to produce a point on E χ (F ) in general! Logan, D, (2003): We can nonetheless propose a conjectural formula to compute it in practice, via ATR cycles.

The mysterious elliptic curves Theorem (Matteo Longo) L(E/F, χ, 1) 0 = #E χ (F ) <. Yu Zhao s PhD thesis (defended March 10, 2011): Theorem (Rotger, Zhao, D) If E is a Q-curve, i.e., is isogenous to its Galois conjugate, then ord s=1 L(E/F, χ, s) = 1 = rank(e χ (F )) = 1. We have no idea how to produce a point on E χ (F ) in general! Logan, D, (2003): We can nonetheless propose a conjectural formula to compute it in practice, via ATR cycles.

ATR cycles Let Y be the (open) Hilbert modular surface attached to E/F : Y (C) = SL 2 (O F )\(H 1 H 2 ). Let γ SL 2 (O F ), with a (unique) fixed point τ 1 H 1. Then the field K generated by the eigenvalues of γ is an ATR extension of F. To each γ, we will attach a cycle γ Y (C) of real dimension one which behaves like a Heegner point.

ATR cycles Let Y be the (open) Hilbert modular surface attached to E/F : Y (C) = SL 2 (O F )\(H 1 H 2 ). Let γ SL 2 (O F ), with a (unique) fixed point τ 1 H 1. Then the field K generated by the eigenvalues of γ is an ATR extension of F. To each γ, we will attach a cycle γ Y (C) of real dimension one which behaves like a Heegner point.

ATR cycles Let Y be the (open) Hilbert modular surface attached to E/F : Y (C) = SL 2 (O F )\(H 1 H 2 ). Let γ SL 2 (O F ), with a (unique) fixed point τ 1 H 1. Then the field K generated by the eigenvalues of γ is an ATR extension of F. To each γ, we will attach a cycle γ Y (C) of real dimension one which behaves like a Heegner point.

ATR cycles Let Y be the (open) Hilbert modular surface attached to E/F : Y (C) = SL 2 (O F )\(H 1 H 2 ). Let γ SL 2 (O F ), with a (unique) fixed point τ 1 H 1. Then the field K generated by the eigenvalues of γ is an ATR extension of F. To each γ, we will attach a cycle γ Y (C) of real dimension one which behaves like a Heegner point.

ATR cycles τ 1 := fixed point of γ H 1 ; τ 2, τ 2 := fixed points of γ (H 2 R); Υ γ = {τ 1 } geodesic(τ 2 τ 2 ). τ 1 τ 2 τ 2 γ = Υ γ / γ Y (C). Key fact: The cycles γ are null-homologous.

ATR cycles τ 1 := fixed point of γ H 1 ; τ 2, τ 2 := fixed points of γ (H 2 R); Υ γ = {τ 1 } geodesic(τ 2 τ 2 ). τ 1 τ 2 τ 2 γ = Υ γ / γ Y (C). Key fact: The cycles γ are null-homologous.

ATR cycles τ 1 := fixed point of γ H 1 ; τ 2, τ 2 := fixed points of γ (H 2 R); Υ γ = {τ 1 } geodesic(τ 2 τ 2 ). τ 1 τ 2 τ 2 γ = Υ γ / γ Y (C). Key fact: The cycles γ are null-homologous.

ATR cycles τ 1 := fixed point of γ H 1 ; τ 2, τ 2 := fixed points of γ (H 2 R); Υ γ = {τ 1 } geodesic(τ 2 τ 2 ). τ 1 τ 2 τ 2 γ = Υ γ / γ Y (C). Key fact: The cycles γ are null-homologous.

Oda s conjecture on periods For any closed 2-form ω G Ω G, let Λ G denote its set of periods, as in Kartik s lectures: Λ G = { ω G, γ H 2 (X (C), Z)).} γ Conjecture (Oda, 1982) For a suitable choice of ω G, we have C/Λ G E(C).

Oda s conjecture on periods For any closed 2-form ω G Ω G, let Λ G denote its set of periods, as in Kartik s lectures: Λ G = { ω G, γ H 2 (X (C), Z)).} γ Conjecture (Oda, 1982) For a suitable choice of ω G, we have C/Λ G E(C).

Points attached to ATR cycles P γ(g)? := AJ( γ )(ω G ) := ω G 1 γ C/Λ G = E(C). Γtrace=t = (Γγ 1 Γ 1 ) (Γγ h Γ 1 ). Conjecture (Logan, D, 2003) The points P? γ j (G) belongs to E(H) Q, where H is a specific ring class field of K. They are conjugate to each other under Gal(H/K), and the point P? K (G) := P? γ 1 (G) + + P? γ h (G) is of infinite order if and only if L (E/K, 1) 0.

Points attached to ATR cycles P γ(g)? := AJ( γ )(ω G ) := ω G 1 γ C/Λ G = E(C). Γtrace=t = (Γγ 1 Γ 1 ) (Γγ h Γ 1 ). Conjecture (Logan, D, 2003) The points P? γ j (G) belongs to E(H) Q, where H is a specific ring class field of K. They are conjugate to each other under Gal(H/K), and the point P? K (G) := P? γ 1 (G) + + P? γ h (G) is of infinite order if and only if L (E/K, 1) 0.

Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields ATR points are defined over abelian extensions of a quadratic ATR extension K of a real quadratic field F. There is a second setting, equally fraught with mystery, involving an elliptic curve E/Q over Q and class fields of real quadratic fields. Simplest case: E/Q is of prime conductor p, and K is a real quadratic field in which p is inert. H p = P 1 (C p ) P 1 (Q p )

Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields ATR points are defined over abelian extensions of a quadratic ATR extension K of a real quadratic field F. There is a second setting, equally fraught with mystery, involving an elliptic curve E/Q over Q and class fields of real quadratic fields. Simplest case: E/Q is of prime conductor p, and K is a real quadratic field in which p is inert. H p = P 1 (C p ) P 1 (Q p )

Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields ATR points are defined over abelian extensions of a quadratic ATR extension K of a real quadratic field F. There is a second setting, equally fraught with mystery, involving an elliptic curve E/Q over Q and class fields of real quadratic fields. Simplest case: E/Q is of prime conductor p, and K is a real quadratic field in which p is inert. H p = P 1 (C p ) P 1 (Q p )

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

A dictionary between the two settings ATR cycles F real quadratic 0, 1 E/F of conductor 1 Real quadratic points Q p, E/Q of conductor p SL 2 (O F )\(H H) SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H) K/F ATR ATR cycles K/Q real quadratic, with p inert Cycles in SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H).

From ATR extensions to real quadratic fields One can develop the notions in the right-hand column to the extent of 1 Attaching to f S 2 (Γ 0 (p)) a Hilbert modular form G on SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H). 2 Making sense of the expression 1 γ ω G K p /q Z = E(K p ) for any p-adic ATR cycle γ. The resulting local points are defined (conjecturally) over ring class fields of K. They are prototypical Stark-Heegner points...

From ATR extensions to real quadratic fields One can develop the notions in the right-hand column to the extent of 1 Attaching to f S 2 (Γ 0 (p)) a Hilbert modular form G on SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H). 2 Making sense of the expression 1 γ ω G K p /q Z = E(K p ) for any p-adic ATR cycle γ. The resulting local points are defined (conjecturally) over ring class fields of K. They are prototypical Stark-Heegner points...

From ATR extensions to real quadratic fields One can develop the notions in the right-hand column to the extent of 1 Attaching to f S 2 (Γ 0 (p)) a Hilbert modular form G on SL 2 (Z[1/p])\(H p H). 2 Making sense of the expression 1 γ ω G K p /q Z = E(K p ) for any p-adic ATR cycle γ. The resulting local points are defined (conjecturally) over ring class fields of K. They are prototypical Stark-Heegner points...

Computing Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields There are fantastically efficient polynomial-time algorithms for calculating Stark-Heegner points, based on the ideas of Glenn Stevens and Rob Pollack. (Cf. their AWS lectures.)

Drawback of Stark-Heegner vs Chow-Heegner points They are completely mysterious and the mecanisms underlying their algebraicity are poorly understood.

Advantage of Stark-Heegner vs Chow-Heegner points They are completely mysterious and the mecanisms underlying their algebraicity are poorly understood.

New cases of the BSD conjecture? Theorem (Bertolini, Dasgupta, D + Longo, Rotger, Vigni) Assume the conjectures on Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields (in the stronger, more precise form given in Samit Dasgupta s PhD thesis). Then L(E/K, χ, 1) 0 = (E(H) C) χ = 0, for all χ : Gal(H/K) C with H a ring class field of the real quadratic field K. Question. Can we control the arithmetic of E over ring class fields of real quadratic fields without invoking Stark-Heegner points?

New cases of the BSD conjecture? Theorem (Bertolini, Dasgupta, D + Longo, Rotger, Vigni) Assume the conjectures on Stark-Heegner points attached to real quadratic fields (in the stronger, more precise form given in Samit Dasgupta s PhD thesis). Then L(E/K, χ, 1) 0 = (E(H) C) χ = 0, for all χ : Gal(H/K) C with H a ring class field of the real quadratic field K. Question. Can we control the arithmetic of E over ring class fields of real quadratic fields without invoking Stark-Heegner points?

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles on triple products of Kuga-Sato varieties Let r 1 r 2 r 3 be integers, with r 1 r 2 + r 3. r = r 1 + r 2 + r 3 2 V = E r 1 E r 2 E r 3, dim V = 2r + 3. = E r V. CH r+2 (V ). cl( ) = 0 in H 2r+4 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2) G Q. AJ et ( ) H 1 (Q, H 2r+3 et (V Q, Q l)(r + 2)).

Diagonal cycles and L-series Let f, g, h be modular forms of weights r 1 + 2, r 2 + 2 and r 3 + 2. By taking the (f, g, h)-isotypic component of the class AJ et ( ), we obtain a cohomology class κ(f, g, h) H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (r + 2)) Its behaviour is related to the central critical derivative L (f g h, r + 2). We don t really care about these rather recundite L-series with Euler factors of degree 8...

Diagonal cycles and L-series Let f, g, h be modular forms of weights r 1 + 2, r 2 + 2 and r 3 + 2. By taking the (f, g, h)-isotypic component of the class AJ et ( ), we obtain a cohomology class κ(f, g, h) H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (r + 2)) Its behaviour is related to the central critical derivative L (f g h, r + 2). We don t really care about these rather recundite L-series with Euler factors of degree 8...

Diagonal cycles and L-series Let f, g, h be modular forms of weights r 1 + 2, r 2 + 2 and r 3 + 2. By taking the (f, g, h)-isotypic component of the class AJ et ( ), we obtain a cohomology class κ(f, g, h) H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (r + 2)) Its behaviour is related to the central critical derivative L (f g h, r + 2). We don t really care about these rather recundite L-series with Euler factors of degree 8...

Diagonal cycles and L-series Let f, g, h be modular forms of weights r 1 + 2, r 2 + 2 and r 3 + 2. By taking the (f, g, h)-isotypic component of the class AJ et ( ), we obtain a cohomology class κ(f, g, h) H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (r + 2)) Its behaviour is related to the central critical derivative L (f g h, r + 2). We don t really care about these rather recundite L-series with Euler factors of degree 8...

From Rankin triple products to Stark-Heegner points The position of the Stark-Heegner points are controlled by the central critical values L(E/F, χ, 1), as χ ranges over ring class characters of the real quadratic field F. Write χ = χ 1 χ 2, where χ 1 and χ 2 are characters of signature (1, 1), so that V 1 = Ind Q F χ 1, V 2 = Ind Q F χ 2 are odd two-dimensional representations of Q. Hecke: There exists modular forms g and h of weight one, such that L(g, s) = L(V 1, s), L(h, s) = L(V 2, s). Furthermore, L(f g h, 1) = L(E/F, χ, 1)L(E/F, χ 1 χ ρ 2, 1).

From Rankin triple products to Stark-Heegner points The position of the Stark-Heegner points are controlled by the central critical values L(E/F, χ, 1), as χ ranges over ring class characters of the real quadratic field F. Write χ = χ 1 χ 2, where χ 1 and χ 2 are characters of signature (1, 1), so that V 1 = Ind Q F χ 1, V 2 = Ind Q F χ 2 are odd two-dimensional representations of Q. Hecke: There exists modular forms g and h of weight one, such that L(g, s) = L(V 1, s), L(h, s) = L(V 2, s). Furthermore, L(f g h, 1) = L(E/F, χ, 1)L(E/F, χ 1 χ ρ 2, 1).

From Rankin triple products to Stark-Heegner points The position of the Stark-Heegner points are controlled by the central critical values L(E/F, χ, 1), as χ ranges over ring class characters of the real quadratic field F. Write χ = χ 1 χ 2, where χ 1 and χ 2 are characters of signature (1, 1), so that V 1 = Ind Q F χ 1, V 2 = Ind Q F χ 2 are odd two-dimensional representations of Q. Hecke: There exists modular forms g and h of weight one, such that L(g, s) = L(V 1, s), L(h, s) = L(V 2, s). Furthermore, L(f g h, 1) = L(E/F, χ, 1)L(E/F, χ 1 χ ρ 2, 1).

Hida families A slight extension of what we learned in Rob s lecture: Theorem (Hida) There exist q-series with coefficients in A(U), such that g = b n (k)q n, h = n=1 c n (k)q n, n=1 g(1) = g, h(1) = h, and g k := g(k) and h k := h(k) are (normalised) eigenforms for almost all k Z 1.

Hida families A slight extension of what we learned in Rob s lecture: Theorem (Hida) There exist q-series with coefficients in A(U), such that g = b n (k)q n, h = n=1 c n (k)q n, n=1 g(1) = g, h(1) = h, and g k := g(k) and h k := h(k) are (normalised) eigenforms for almost all k Z 1.

The theme of p-adic variation Philosophy: The natural p-adic invariants attached to (classical) modular forms varying in p-adic families should also vary in p-adic families. Example: The Serre-Deligne representation V g of G Q attached to a classical eigenform g. Theorem There exists a Λ-adic representation V g of G Q satisfying V g evk Q p = V gk, for almost all k Z 2.

The theme of p-adic variation Philosophy: The natural p-adic invariants attached to (classical) modular forms varying in p-adic families should also vary in p-adic families. Example: The Serre-Deligne representation V g of G Q attached to a classical eigenform g. Theorem There exists a Λ-adic representation V g of G Q satisfying V g evk Q p = V gk, for almost all k Z 2.

The theme of p-adic variation Philosophy: The natural p-adic invariants attached to (classical) modular forms varying in p-adic families should also vary in p-adic families. Example: The Serre-Deligne representation V g of G Q attached to a classical eigenform g. Theorem There exists a Λ-adic representation V g of G Q satisfying V g evk Q p = V gk, for almost all k Z 2.

Diagonal cycles and their p-adic deformations For each k Z >1, consider the cohomology classes κ k := κ(f, g k, h k ) H 1 (Q, V f V gk V hk (1)). Conjecture There exists a big cohomology class κ H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (1)) such that κ(k) = κ k for almost all k Z 2. Remark: This is in the spirit of work of Ben Howard on the big cohomology classes attached to Heegner points. Question: What relation (if any!) is there between the class κ(1) H 1 (K, V p (E)(χ)) and Stark-Heegner points attached to (E/K, χ)?

Diagonal cycles and their p-adic deformations For each k Z >1, consider the cohomology classes κ k := κ(f, g k, h k ) H 1 (Q, V f V gk V hk (1)). Conjecture There exists a big cohomology class κ H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (1)) such that κ(k) = κ k for almost all k Z 2. Remark: This is in the spirit of work of Ben Howard on the big cohomology classes attached to Heegner points. Question: What relation (if any!) is there between the class κ(1) H 1 (K, V p (E)(χ)) and Stark-Heegner points attached to (E/K, χ)?

Diagonal cycles and their p-adic deformations For each k Z >1, consider the cohomology classes κ k := κ(f, g k, h k ) H 1 (Q, V f V gk V hk (1)). Conjecture There exists a big cohomology class κ H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (1)) such that κ(k) = κ k for almost all k Z 2. Remark: This is in the spirit of work of Ben Howard on the big cohomology classes attached to Heegner points. Question: What relation (if any!) is there between the class κ(1) H 1 (K, V p (E)(χ)) and Stark-Heegner points attached to (E/K, χ)?

Diagonal cycles and their p-adic deformations For each k Z >1, consider the cohomology classes κ k := κ(f, g k, h k ) H 1 (Q, V f V gk V hk (1)). Conjecture There exists a big cohomology class κ H 1 (Q, V f V g V h (1)) such that κ(k) = κ k for almost all k Z 2. Remark: This is in the spirit of work of Ben Howard on the big cohomology classes attached to Heegner points. Question: What relation (if any!) is there between the class κ(1) H 1 (K, V p (E)(χ)) and Stark-Heegner points attached to (E/K, χ)?

Our goal for the AWS Before seriously attacking the study of p-adic deformations of diagonal cycles and their (eventual) connection with Stark-Heegner points, it is natural to make a careful study of diagonal cycles and their arithmetic properties. Because of our predilection for the BSD conjecture and because elliptic curves are most amenable to computer calculation we are interested in settings where these diagonal cycles give rise to Chow-Heegner points on elliptic curves, as described in Victor s first lecture. The calculation of these Chow-Heegner points will be the focus of the last two lectures by Victor and me, and of the AWS student projects.

Our goal for the AWS Before seriously attacking the study of p-adic deformations of diagonal cycles and their (eventual) connection with Stark-Heegner points, it is natural to make a careful study of diagonal cycles and their arithmetic properties. Because of our predilection for the BSD conjecture and because elliptic curves are most amenable to computer calculation we are interested in settings where these diagonal cycles give rise to Chow-Heegner points on elliptic curves, as described in Victor s first lecture. The calculation of these Chow-Heegner points will be the focus of the last two lectures by Victor and me, and of the AWS student projects.

Our goal for the AWS Before seriously attacking the study of p-adic deformations of diagonal cycles and their (eventual) connection with Stark-Heegner points, it is natural to make a careful study of diagonal cycles and their arithmetic properties. Because of our predilection for the BSD conjecture and because elliptic curves are most amenable to computer calculation we are interested in settings where these diagonal cycles give rise to Chow-Heegner points on elliptic curves, as described in Victor s first lecture. The calculation of these Chow-Heegner points will be the focus of the last two lectures by Victor and me, and of the AWS student projects.