Automatic Magnitude Determination

Similar documents
INTERPRETATION OF SEISMOGRAMS

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 3 WHAT'S MISSING? 4 OBJECTIVES 5

Earthquake Stress Drops in Southern California

STUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Earthquake stress drop estimates: What are they telling us?

Southern California ground motion envelopes over ranges of magnitudes, distances, and site conditions

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

EARTH STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY PRACTICALS. G.R. Foulger

SURFACE WAVE DISPERSION PRACTICAL (Keith Priestley)

Automated Processing of. Very Short Epicentral Distances. José M. Cepeda Universidad Centroamericana, (UCA) San Salvador, El Salvador

Appendix I Determination of M W and calibration of M L (SED) M W regression

Challenges and Strategies for Monitoring Induced Seismic Activity

Source parameters II. Stress drop determination Energy balance Seismic energy and seismic efficiency The heat flow paradox Apparent stress drop

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

SOURCE PARAMETERS STUDY OF LOCAL EARTHQUAKES IN THE GARHWAL HIMALAYA REGION BASED ON THE DIGITAL BROADBAND DATA

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOURCE SPECTRA OF SMALL AND LARGE INTERMEDIATE DEPTH EARTHQUAKES AROUND HOKKAIDO, JAPAN

Data Repository: Seismic and Geodetic Evidence For Extensive, Long-Lived Fault Damage Zones

LOCAL MAGNITUDE SCALE FOR MONGOLIA AND DETERMINATION OF M WP AND M S (BB)

Magnitude determinations

Observation of shear-wave splitting from microseismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing: A non-vti story

Oceanic Detachment Faults Generate Compression in Extension

Quiz 6. 1) The measure of the time between two peaks of a sine wave is called the. A) period B) wavelength C) amplitude.

EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PARAMETERS OF MODERATELY EARTHQUAKE IN THE SOUTH EASTERN IRAN BASED ON TELESEISMIC AND REGIONAL DISTANCES

The 2016, October 26, Central Italy Earthquake Origin Time 17:10:36 UTC, M L(ISNet) =5.3; M W(ISNet) =5.6

Short Note Fault Slip Velocities Inferred from the Spectra of Ground Motions

TRACE MANUAL. IMS Document Number: TRACE User Manual_v4

SOME EMPIRICAL RELATIONS FOR ATTENUATION OF GROUND-MOTION SPECTRAL AMPLITUDES IN SOUTHWESTERN WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Seismic Source Mechanism

P-wave and S-wave near-surface characterization in NEBC. Liliana Zuleta and Don C. Lawton 1 st December, 2011

Sample paper 1. Question 1. What is the dimensional formula of torque? A. MLT -2 B. MT -2 C. ML 2 T -2 D. MLT -1 E. ML 3 T -2.

Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The 2002 M5 Au Sable Forks, NY, earthquake sequence: Source scaling relationships and energy budget

Maximum Direction to Geometric Mean Spectral Response Ratios using the Relevance Vector Machine

The Deconvolution of Multicomponent Trace Vectors

Test, Lesson 7 Waves - Answer Key Page 1

Bandlimited impedance inversion: using well logs to fill low frequency information in a non-homogenous model

NARAYANA JUNIOR COLLEGE

Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Waveform Modeling

GLOSSARY 1. Accelerometer (Analog or Digital)

Date: 1 April (1) The only reference material you may use is one 8½x11 crib sheet and a calculator.

RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION

Magnitude, scaling, and spectral signature of tensile microseisms

Date: 31 March (1) The only reference material you may use is one 8½x11 crib sheet and a calculator.

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Strong Motion Observation - Data Analysis - Toshihide Kashima IISEE, BRI

Simple Harmonic Motion and Oscillations on an Incline

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

BRIEF ARTICLE THE AUTHOR

Microseismic Monitoring Shale Gas Plays: Advances in the Understanding of Hydraulic Fracturing 20 MAR 16 HANNAH CHITTENDEN

IGPP. Departmental Examination

Source parameters and seismic moment-magnitude scaling for Northwestern. (1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473, Potsdam Germany

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Approach to Random Vibration Theory (RVT) for NGA-East

Anatomy of an Earthquake Focus (or hypocentre): the center of energy release.

DYNAMIC DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GROUND IDENTIFIED FROM SEISMIC OBSERVATIONS IN VERTICAL BOREHOLES

AP Physics Free Response Practice Kinematics ANSWERS 1982B1 2

Geophysical Research Letters. Supporting Information for

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp , February 1987

Experiment P28: Conservation of Linear and Angular Momentum (Smart Pulley)

3D Finite Element Modeling of fault-slip triggering caused by porepressure

Lab 11 Simple Harmonic Motion A study of the kind of motion that results from the force applied to an object by a spring

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Source Parameters and Scaling Relation for Local Earthquakes in the Garhwal and Kumaun Himalaya, India

Peter Shearer 1, Robin Matoza 1, Cecily Wolfe 2, Guoqing Lin 3, & Paul Okubo 4

PEAK ACCELERATION SCALING STUDIES

A Guide to Differences between Stochastic Point Source and Stochastic Finite Fault Simulation Methods

7.2.1 Seismic waves. Waves in a mass- spring system

VolksMeter with one as opposed to two pendulums

COMPARISON OF FREQUENCY AND TIME-DOMAIN OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS FOR BOREHOLE STATION'S INVERSE PROBLEMS

3.3. Waveform Cross-Correlation, Earthquake Locations and HYPODD

Displacement at very low frequencies produces very low accelerations since:

Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records

Estimation of Moment Magnitude (M) for Small Events ( M<4) on Local Networks

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Introduction to Earthquake Seismology Assignment 18

A. Incorrect! It looks like you forgot to include π in your calculation of angular velocity.

Induced seismicity in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) in Alsace, France. Jean Schmittbuhl 1

AP Physics 1. April 11, Simple Harmonic Motion. Table of Contents. Period. SHM and Circular Motion

Force, Energy & Periodic Motion. Preparation for unit test

San Jacinto Fault Zone and Sage Brush Flat High Frequency Experiments

Physics 41 HW Set 1 Chapter 15 Serway 8 th ( 7 th )

Magnitude Central Italy

Waves Part 1: Travelling Waves

Hybrid k-squared source model for strong ground motion simulations: Introduction

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Differential equation of wave motion

ENV-5004B/ENVK5005B. Figure 6. Student Registration No. ENV-5004B/ENVK5005B Version 2

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

Fling-Step vs Filtering: Effects on Response Spectra and Peak Motions. David M. Boore. Introduction

1. Types of Waves. There are three main types of waves:

Structural Cause of Missed Eruption in the Lunayyir Basaltic

Lecture 1 Notes: 06 / 27. The first part of this class will primarily cover oscillating systems (harmonic oscillators and waves).

EOS 350 MIDTERM OCT 4, 2013 STUDENT NAME: TEAM #:

Chapter 14 Oscillations

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF LIMA, PERU, USING A NEWLY DEPLOYED STRONG-MOTION NETWORK

AP Physics. Harmonic Motion. Multiple Choice. Test E

Moment of inertia and angular acceleration with Cobra 3

Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for a Shallow Crustal Earthquake in Japan Based on the Pseudo Point-Source Model

Transcription:

Automatic Magnitude Determination by Wolfgang A. Lenhardt & Nikolaus Horn AUG Trieste, 2004 Content: Moment Magnitude Other Magnitudes

Moment Magnitude - Steps 1. The location of the earthquake must be known via gridassoc, dblocsat or genloc 2. Determine the theoretical P-wave arrival 3. Determine the theoretical S-wave arrival 4. Cut out a segment which starts at p-arrival minus s-p-arrival and ending at s-arrival + s-p-arrival. 5. Apply the Transfer Function of the system. This transfer function must be either known or estimated (assured by comparative measurements). 6. Select filter 7. Estimate the average of the ground movements prior to the theoretical P-wave arrival from the noise 8. Select an appropriate S-wave time window (such as S-P-time*0,1) beginning at Stheo (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1 and ending at * (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1 9. Apply a baseline correction to the recorded data stream (subtracting it) based on 5 seconds of data prior to the p-wave arrival (see point 4). Apply Cosine-taper. 10. Calculate the Fourier Spectrum 11. Determine the plateau of the spectrum, corner frequency, etc. and finally the moment magnitude

Time Window Get theoretical P- and S-wave arrival based on hypocenter (epicentral distance and depth) from travel-time table. Cut out trace according to large time window (green) ranging from P minus S-P until S plus S-P. S P Apply transfer function to get the true velocity trace from the selected time-window (green). The reason for the large time window is to minimize filtereffects when cutting out the noise- and S-wave time-series.

Choosing the Filter Analyse noise by determining Nmin (Noise minimum), Nmax (Noise maximum), and average of the noise from a timewindow prior to the theoretical p-wave arrival and determine average, E.g. from p-wave arrival minus (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.5 until p-wave arrival minus(stheo-ptheo)*0.1 Select an appropriate S-wave time window (such as S-Ptime*0,1) beginning at Stheo (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1 and ending at * (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1 Analyse S-wave (get min and max and determine Smax - Smin).) If hypocentral distance < 300 km 1 10 Hz else 0.05 and 10 Hz Determine again min, max and average of the noise and of the S-wave. If Smax-Smin < 2*(Nmax Nmin) then Forget it, else select the appropriate S-wave time window again (such as S- P-time*0,1) beginning at Stheo (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1 and ending at * (Stheo-Ptheo)*0.1

Spectra Classical Approach Ωo f -2 1. Subtract average noise from velocity trace 2. Integrate velocity trace giving the displacement or apply the Transfer Function and correct directly for displacement 3. Determine spectrum from displacement trace meter-seconds Seismic moment Rc = 0.55 for with M0 a 3 4 VS Ω0Rc = πρ radiation factor P waves and Rc = 0.63 for S waves, shear wave velocity VS = 3400m / s, density = 2700kg / m³ Source radius with a source shape kv r = S 2πf0 factor ' k' of = e. g. 2.34 ( Brune) f 0 Corner frequency Stress drop σ 7M = 0 3 16r

Spectra Trick displacement-seconds Ωo f -2 f 0 Corner frequency I suggest the following trick when automatically calculating the corner frequency: Smooth spectrum! Don t forget that we are dealing the double logarithmic scales. Start an iteration from the Nyquistfrequency (2/sampling rate per second) down to the lowest frequency defined by the length of the selected time window (2/time window length) thus moving f 0. 1. Divide the spectra into a left (red) and a right (blue) part 2. Determine the variance of the left part with a fixed slope and determine the variance of the right part, while the slope must be 2 (Brune s model). 3. While moving f 0 determine the sum of both variances (left and right side) and find their minimum. The smallest sum of variances indicates the desired corner frequency f 0. Note: Watch out for significance! Usually the left side has much less data than the right side

Spectra Alternative Approach 1. Subtract average noise from velocity trace 2. Determine spectrum from velocity trace V(f) velocity-trace 3. Integrate velocity trace giving the displacement 4. Determine spectrum from velocity trace D(f) displacement-trace 2 2 SV 2 = 2 V ( f ) df ; SD2 = 2 D ( f ) df 0 1/ 4 3/ 4 Ω0 = 2SV 2 SD 2 0 Es = 4πρVS SV 2 1 S f V 2 0 = 2π SD2 Seismic energy Corner frequency M0 with a 3 = 4πρVS Ω0Rc radiation factor Seismic moment with a source shape kv r = S 2πf0 factor ' k' of Source radius = e. g. 2.34 ( Brune) Rc = 0.55 for P waves shear wave velocity VS and Rc = 0.63 for S waves, = 3400m / s, density = 2700kg / m³ σ 7M = 0 3 16r Stress drop See Di Bona, M. & Rovelli, A. 1988. Effects of the bandwidth limitation on stress drops estimated from integrals of the ground motion. Bull.Seism.Soc.Am., Vol.78, 1818-1825

Comments The final Moment Magnitude M w is defined by Hanks and Kanamori (1979) by (M o in Newton-meters) assuming a constant stress drop of 1/10000 of the shear modulus) M w = 0.667*log(M o ) 6.1 The following options should be possible when determining the source parameters manually: 1. Time Window 2. Method (classic, alternative) 3. Filter 4. Type of wave (P or S, accordingly some constants would change) As a control, the program could compare the theoretical peak velocity and/ or peak displacement of the shear wave, which should be of the order of (R = distance) with the observed ones: v peak = v peak RS 2 2πf 0 M0 RS = 0.57; k = 2.34 3 4πρRVS 0.0686 3 2 2 = σ M0 M0 = GDπr ρrvs 8.1Rv peak Dpeak = VS

Other Magnitudes Definition: Amplitude = ( Peak to Peak ) / 2 Advantage: Automatic determination possible Same algorithm for velocity and acceleration traces Velocity data are used for mb, Ml and Ms Acceleration data are correlated against Ml

Using Velocity Data

Using Acceleration Data

Summary Ml very robust if the total time window (P & S) is considered > circumventing focal pattern Findings: Ml (S13) = Ml (BB) 0,3 mb = Ms 0,3 Ms determined from surface waves require the same constants as for Ml. Interpretations based on Z-components are more stable than those from horizontal components. Interpretations based on accelerations require other constants than those used for velocity traces > attenuation effect

Single Station Location User Command: dbarrparams Gives: azimuth, incidence angle, rectilinearity amplitude, period first motion Remark: The incidence angle reflects the apparent angle of incidence. It must be corrected via i true = arcsin ((v p /v s ) * sin (i app /2)) Hence, an assumption must be made for v p /v s for each station. The v p /v s -ratio can be verified by using nearby blasts, where i true should be ~ 90.