CHAPTER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Similar documents
LIMITATIONS TO INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS OF. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Howard P. Isermann Department of Chemical Engineering, Troy,

Control of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes

3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions

Ch 14: Feedback Control systems

DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL

DESIGN OF PI CONTROLLERS FOR MIMO SYSTEM WITH DECOUPLERS

Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process

CONTROL OF MULTIVARIABLE PROCESSES

Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies Chapter 16

Fundamental Principles of Process Control

Improved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback

Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control

Process Unit Control System Design

CHAPTER 2 CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANK REACTOR PROCESS DESCRIPTION

PROPORTIONAL-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers

CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER

CM 3310 Process Control, Spring Lecture 21

Subject: Introduction to Process Control. Week 01, Lectures 01 02, Spring Content

Control of Neutralization Process in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)

NonlinearControlofpHSystemforChangeOverTitrationCurve

Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies (Advanced Control) Cascade Control Time-Delay Compensation Inferential Control Selective and Override Control

Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Twin-Screw Food Extruder: A Multivariable Case Study for a Process Control Course

Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems

Virtual Sensor Technology for Process Optimization. Edward Wilson Neural Applications Corporation

Design and Implementation of Decentralized Pi Controller for Pilot Plant Binary Distillation Column

Model Predictive Control Design for Nonlinear Process Control Reactor Case Study: CSTR (Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor)

Process Modelling, Identification, and Control

Overview of Control System Design

Chaos Control via Non-singular Terminal Sliding Mode Controller in Auto Gauge Control System Wei-wei ZHANG, Jun-tao PAN and Hong-tao SHI

BITS-Pilani Dubai, International Academic City, Dubai Second Semester. Academic Year

Design and Comparative Analysis of Controller for Non Linear Tank System

Index Accumulation, 53 Accuracy: numerical integration, sensor, 383, Adaptive tuning: expert system, 528 gain scheduling, 518, 529, 709,

MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS

Nonlinear ph Control Using a Three Parameter Model

Guide to Selected Process Examples :ili3g eil;]iil

Design of Multivariable Neural Controllers Using a Classical Approach

Control Introduction. Gustaf Olsson IEA Lund University.

Process Control Hardware Fundamentals

Solutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis

Index. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765

Linearized optimal power flow

Overview of Control System Design

HYBRID FUZZY LOGIC AND PID CONTROLLER FOR PH NEUTRALIZATION PILOT PLANT

USE OF FILTERED SMITH PREDICTOR IN DMC

Advanced Adaptive Control for Unintended System Behavior

Simple Optimization (SOPT) for Nonlinear Constrained Optimization Problem

Design of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system

Multi-Loop Control. Department of Chemical Engineering,

Design and implementation of model predictive control for a three-tank hybrid system

Quantitative Robust Control Engineering: Theory and Applications

Mathematical model for neutralization system

FAULT-TOLERANT CONTROL OF CHEMICAL PROCESS SYSTEMS USING COMMUNICATION NETWORKS. Nael H. El-Farra, Adiwinata Gani & Panagiotis D.

GAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL

PHY 133 Lab 1 - The Pendulum

Process Modelling, Identification, and Control

ME 132, Dynamic Systems and Feedback. Class Notes. Spring Instructor: Prof. A Packard

CBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL

On Practical Applications of Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Simulation based Modeling and Implementation of Adaptive Control Technique for Non Linear Process Tank

ECEN 5005 Crystals, Nanocrystals and Device Applications Class 18 Group Theory For Crystals

Chapter 1 Basic Characteristics of Control Systems and their Representation Process and Instrument Diagrams

DESIGN OF AN ADAPTIVE FUZZY-BASED CONTROL SYSTEM USING GENETIC ALGORITHM OVER A ph TITRATION PROCESS

Nonlinear Model Reduction of Differential Algebraic Equation (DAE) Systems

of a Polymerization CSTR with

DECENTRALIZED PI CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR NON LINEAR MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS BASED ON IDEAL DECOUPLER

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-1 Robust Performance

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF TWO-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM CONTROLLER AND MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLER FOR THREE TANK INTERACTING SYSTEM

Solutions for 6.1A Extra Practice Questions: Properties of Solutions

The Computational Complexity Analysis of a MINLP-Based Chemical Process Control Design

Overview of Control System Design

CHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES

Wannabe-MPC for Large Systems Based on Multiple Iterative PI Controllers

by applying concept of auto switch PID in real time process.

On an internal multimodel control for nonlinear multivariable systems - A comparative study

University of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.

A brief introduction to robust H control

MULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO. PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study

ChE 6303 Advanced Process Control

Modeling and Control Overview

Process Solutions. Process Dynamics. The Fundamental Principle of Process Control. APC Techniques Dynamics 2-1. Page 2-1

Simulation of Quadruple Tank Process for Liquid Level Control

Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:30 min)

This relationship is known as the ideal gas law and is mathematically described with the formula below:

Control Engineering Group

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Institute of Information Engineering, Automation, and Mathematics PROCEEDINGS

Design of Controller using Variable Transformations for a Two Tank Conical Interacting Level Systems

ANFIS Gain Scheduled Johnson s Algorithm based State Feedback Control of CSTR

Experimental Study of Fractional Order Proportional Integral (FOPI) Controller for Water Level Control

ANALYZE In all three cases (a) (c), the reading on the scale is. w = mg = (11.0 kg) (9.8 m/s 2 ) = 108 N.

INTRODUCTION TO THE SIMULATION OF ENERGY AND STORAGE SYSTEMS

System Identification Using Predictive Controller Case Study: Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor

(Refer Slide Time: 1:42)

Gain Scheduling Control with Multi-loop PID for 2-DOF Arm Robot Trajectory Control

The 10 th international Energy Conference (IEC 2014)

Incorporating Feedforward Action into Self-optimizing Control Policies

Process Control, 3P4 Assignment 6

Solutions for Tutorial 4 Modelling of Non-Linear Systems

Transcription:

15 CHAPTER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 2.1 INTRODUCTION A process havin only one input variable used for controllin one output variable is known as SISO process. The problem of desinin controller for SISO systems can be handled conveniently. But in several important situations, process may have MIMO makin them multivariable nature. However, most of the ideas and techniques presented for SISO systems can be extended to MIMO systems. This chapter discusses two MIMO models, namely Level-Temperature cascaded Process and Level-pH cascaded Process. Both these processes are hihly nonlinear and interactin processes. 2.2 GENERAL FORMULATION OF THE MIMO SYSTEM All process systems consist of three main factors or terms: the manipulated variables, disturbances, and the controlled variables as shown in Fiure 2.1. Typical manipulated variables can be valve position, motor speed, damper position, or blade pitch. The controlled variables for various process applications are those conditions such as temperature, level, position, pressure, ph, density, moisture content, weiht, and speed that must be maintained at some desired value. For each controlled variable, there is an associated manipulated variable. The control system must adjust the

16 manipulated variables so that the desired value or set point of the controlled variable is maintained despite any disturbances. Disturbances Manipulated variable Process Controlled variable Fiure 2.1 General elements of a process Disturbances affect the process and tend to drive the controlled variables away from their desired value or setpoint condition. If the setpoint is chaned, the manipulated quantity must also be chaned so as to brin the controlled variable to its new desired value. Thus, a process control system consists of four essential elements: process, measurement, evaluation, and control. A block diaram of these elements is shown in Fiure 2.2. The diaram also shows the disturbances that enter into the process. Fiure 2.2 shows the input and output of the process and the setpoint used for control. Setpoint Evaluation Measurement Input Control Process Output Disturbance Fiure 2.2 Four elements of a control system

17 A SISO system has a sinle manipulatin variable to control a sinle output variable. In SISO system, no interaction exists. The processes encountered in the real world are usually MIMO systems. Systems with more than one input and/or more than one output are called MIMO system. The MIMO system can either be interactin or non-interactin. One output is affected by only one input, then it is called non-interactin system. If more than one output is affected by an input it is called interactin system. System with more than one controlled output and command input are called multivariable or MIMO systems. A multivariable system experiences interactions and responds poorly. The control of interactin system is more complex than the control of non-interactin system. The output of MIMO system can either be linear or non-linear. For example, an automobile drivin system is a MIMO system. MIMO system can be decoupled into SISO systems. A decoupled SISO system has no interactions. Therefore, Input/Output (I/O) linearization is proposed before applyin a linear controller (Nida Sheibat Othman et al 2011). Suitable SISO controllers are PID controller, Auto tunin PID controller, Fuzzy Loic controller, and Adaptive controller and Neural Network controller. For MIMO process Model Predictive controller, Adaptive controller and Internal Model controller are suitable (Xiaopin Liu et al 2004). SISO techniques are applicable in Food processin industry, Petrochemical industry, and Cement factory. Similarly MIMO is applicable in Distillation column, Boiler control, Power plant, Continuous Stir Tank Reactor (CSTR). Multiloop SISO controllers are often used for controllin interactin multivariable processes because of their simplicity in implementation and they are easily understandable to control enineers and require fewer parameters to tune than multivariable controllers. Another

18 advantae of the multiloop controllers is that loop failure tolerance of the resultin control system can be easily obtained. Two approaches widely used for the analysis and desin of control systems are the transfer function approach and the state variable approach. The transfer function approach is also called the conventional approach or the classical approach and the state variable approach is called the modern approach. The transfer function approach has certain drawbacks. The transfer function approach is enerally applicable only to linear time invariant systems and it is enerally restricted to sinle input sinle output systems. State variable approach is applicable to linear as well as non linear SISO and MIMO systems. State variable approach has number of advantaes when compared to other approaches. Most of the chemical processes are multivariable system. SISO control loops are formed by selectin a measurable output that is most stronly affected by a particular manipulated input (Gopal 2009). This is done because SISO desin techniques are easy to understand, and hardware and software are readily available for SISO controllers. Systems that use several SISO controllers on a multivariable process are referred as Multivariable Sinle Input-Sinle Output (MVSISO) controllers. The selection of a particular measurable output to pair with a certain manipulated input is known as variable pairin and is elaborated in the next chapter. Consider an open loop stable multivariable system with n-inputs and n-outputs as shown in Fiure 2.3. In a Liquid level and temperature process, parameters level couples with liquid flow rate u 1, and temperature couples with liquid flow rate u 1 and heater input u 2. Where r i, i=1..n are the reference inputs; u i, i=1.n are the manipulated variables ; y i, i=1..n are the system outputs G(s) and G c (s) are process transfer function matrix and full

19 dimensional controller matrix respectively with compatible dimensions (Qian Xion et al 2007). 11s 12s 1ns G(s) 21s 22s 2ns and (2.1) n1s n2s nns c11s c12s c1ns Gc(s) c21s c22s c2ns (2.2) cn1s cn2s cnns r 1 + e 1 u 1 y 1 r 2 - + - e 2 u 2 y 2 G c (s) G(s) r n + e n u n y n - Fiure 2.3 Closed loop multivariable control system Recently, there has been a considerable effort to desin decouplin alorithms so that the closed-loop response is exactly linear in a lobal sense. Input/output linearization involves findin nonlinear state feedback laws so that the input/output behavior of the closed-loop system is exactly linear. In the case of SISO systems, the problem is completely solved and explicit formulas for the input/output linearizin state feedback laws are available (Kravaris and Chun 1987). Such a state feedback law can be applied to a nonlinear process, and the resultin control structure is called the Globally

20 Linearizin Control (GLC) structure (Kravaris and Chun 1987). This methodoloy is extended to MIMO systems. A non-linear system with the identical number of inputs and outputs can be represented as m x f(x) (x)u (2.3) j 1 j j y h(x) The followin conditions are sufficient for a system in the form represented by Equation (2.3) to be input/output linearizable: (In Joon Ha and Elmer Gilbert 1986) i. Each output y, possesses a relative order r i. ii. System characteristic matrix is nonsinular for all values of x. These concepts are used to derive necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of a state feedback that linearizes a MIMO nonlinear system in an input/output sense and also to provide explicit formulas for the control law. In a case where all outputs possess relative orders but the characteristic matrix is sinular, it may be possible to modify the system by applyin an invertible linear matrix differential operator to the system outputs, so that the modified system possesses a nonsinular characteristic matrix. Then, an input/ output linearizin state feedback can be used for the modified system to enerate an input/output linearizin state feedback for the oriinal system (Ali Nejati et al 2012). A state feedback is applied to a MIMO nonlinear process and then the problem of controllin the outputs to setpoint reduces to a linear multivariable control problem. The latter can be solved by usin the linear

21 multivariable control theory. This motivates the control structure of Fiure 2.4, which is the Multi Input-Multi Output Globally Linearizin Control (MIMO GLC) structure. Linearized Process Set point + - Linear controller Linearizin alorithm Process Process Output function Output Fiure 2.4 Schematic diaram of the lobally linearizin control This work reports the application of the decouplin and linearization control methods to two MIMO chemical control processes namely, Level-Temperature cascaded process and Level-pH cascaded process. The system considered has two input variables and two output variables. Both these processes are hihly nonlinear and interactin. The first process considered is the Level-Temperature cascaded process. It has two inputs viz., liquid flow rate, u 1 and heat input u 2 produced by the electric heatin coil. The two outputs are liquid level y 1 and temperature y 2. Due to the flow rate, u 1 liquid level increases. This will automatically affect the temperature of the liquid in the reactor also. So an interaction exists between liquid level and liquid temperature. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE LEVEL-TEMPERATURE CASCADED PROCESS In process industries, the control of level, temperature, pressure, and flow are important in many process applications. In this work, the interactin non-linear stable MIMO systems (i.e. Level-Temperature process and Level-pH process) are discussed. The control of level and temperature of

22 liquid in tanks and acid and base flow in tanks are the basic problem in the process industries. A schematic diaram of the Level-Temperature cascaded process model is shown in Fiure 2.5. The taret is to control the level and temperature of the tank at the desired level. The tank is heated electrically by the coil heater. The aim of the controller is to keep the liquid level and the temperature as variables to be controlled with in the set limits (Kazuhiko et al 1991). The liquid is water, and the level is measured by the differential pressure level transmitter. The temperature is measured by the thermocouple installed in the tank. In eneral, the liquid level and the temperature are controlled by adjustin the feed flow rate and the current to the heater respectively. It is clear that an interaction exists in this process. If the feed flow-rate is chaned then the temperature as well as the liquid level chanes. Liquid level x 1 depends on flow rate u 1 and liquid temperature x 2 depends on flow rate u 1 and heater input u 2. COMPUTER D/A A/D c U 1 d U 2 Y 1 b Y 2 a Fiure 2.5 Schematic diaram of the Level-Temperature cascaded process (a) Differential pressure level transmitter (b) Thermocouple (c) Control valve (d) Heater controller and (e) Heater

23 Based on the assumptions that the tank is adiabatic, the tank content is perfectly stirred and the dynamics of the actuator can be neliible, the system is stable. The process model for a stable system based on mass and enery balance is iven by k 1 1 x 1 x 12 u S S 1 (2.4) T o x 1 x 2 2 u 1 u Sx c Sx 2 (2.5) 1 p 1 and the output equations are iven by y 1 = x 1 (2.6) y 2 = x 2 (2.7) where x 1 and x 2 are the liquid level and liquid temperature respectively. u 1 and u 2 are the feed flow rate to the tank and the heat flow rate from the heater respectively. The feed flow rate and heat flow rate are constrained as u 1 22cm 3 s -1 and 0 u 2 2700 Js -1. k = Constant Coefficient = 1.8, S = Cross sectional area of tank, 191 cm 2, x 1 = Liquid level in cm, x 2 = Liquid temperature, C, To = Temperature of the feed 18 C, Cp = Specific heat, 4.2 J -1 K -1, = density of the liquid. 2.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE LEVEL-pH CASCADED PROCESS The main objective of ph process is to control the effluent ph value by manipulatin the flow rate of acid and base. Control of ph is important in the chemical industry. However, ph processes are difficult to control due to their nonlinear dynamics with uncertainties (Yoon et al 2002). Control of ph is vital in the chemical industry especially in waste water

24 treatment. In a chemical process involvin the mixin of streams (acid, base, salts), the ph is a measure of the hydroen ion concentration, that determines the acidity / alkaline of a solution. A neutralization reaction process of a stron acid (HCL) at a concentration CAO and a stron base (NaOH) at a concentration CBO is shown in Fiure 2.6. The two inputs are acid flow rate u 1 and base flow rate u 2 and the two outputs are liquid level in the tank, y 1 and ph value of the liquid, y 2. As the acid or base flow rate varies, it automatically affects the ph value also. This process is more non-linear than the Level-Temperature cascaded process and an interaction also exists between the parameters. The aim of this control process is to keep the liquid level and the ph at the desired values. It is known that this control problem is very difficult when the setpoint is near the point of neutrality, even if the control system is a SISO system. The reactor used is the same vessel as that of the level and temperature process and a similar measurin and control system is used. The liquids flowin are an acid and a base. The liquid level and ph are controlled by adjustin the feed flow rates of acid and base. Liquid level and ph depends on flow rate of acid and base u 1 and u 2 respectively. The process model under the appropriate assumptions is iven by (Nakamoto and Watanabe 1991) k 1 1 x x 2 (u u ) (2.8) 1 S 1 S 1 2 1 x (b - CAO)U (b CBO)U (2.9) 2 Sx lo (a) 1 2 1 10 x 14 x where b 10 2 10 2,

25 a x 10 2 14 10 x 2 Output equation is iven by y 1 = x 1 (2.10) y 2 = x 2 (2.11) The process model under the appropriate assumptions is iven by COMPUTER D/A A/D C d U 1 U 2 b Y 1 Y 2 e a Fiure 2.6 Schematic diaram for the Level-pH cascaded process (a) Difference pressure level transmitter (b) ph sensor (c,d) Control valves (e) ph meter Here, x 1 and x 2 are the liquid level and the values of ph respectively. u 1 and u 2 are feed flow rate of stron acid and stron base respectively. The values S and k are cross sectional area of the tank 191cm 2 and constant coefficient 1.8cm 5/2 s -1 respectively. The feed concentrations are CAO = CBO = 0.03mol cm 3. The feed rates are constrained as 0 u 1, u 2 22cm 3 s -1.

26 2.5 SUMMARY In this chapter, the liquid Level-Temperature cascaded process and liquid Level-pH cascaded process are described in detail. The mathematical models are explained and process parameters are mentioned. The eneral description of SISO process and their applications and MIMO process are also explained. The next chapter deals with the implementation of decouplin alorithms for the nonlinear interactin MIMO system and the simulation results are analyzed after implementin alorithms.