Imaging quantum turbulence in 3 He-B: Do spectral properties of Andreev reflection reveal properties of turbulence? Andrew W. Baggaley and Carlo F. Barenghi (Newcastle University & JQC) Viktor Tsepelin, Shaun N. Fisher, and George R. Pickett (Lancaster University) Martin J. Jackson (Charles University, Prague) Nugzar Suramlishvili (Bristol University) Thanks to the Leverhulme Trust, EPSRC UK, and the EU FP7 network MICROKELVIN
Aim To validate the experimental visualization of turbulence in 3 He-B by showing the relation between the vortex-line density and the Andreev reflectance of the vortex tangle in the first simulations of the Andreev reflectance by a realistic 3D vortex tangle, and comparing the results with the first experimental measurements in 3 He-B able to probe quantum turbulence on length scales smaller than the inter-vortex separation 1. 1 In Prague 4 He experiments at temperaturs 1K < T < T λ, quantum turbulence on the length scales smaller than the intervortex separation was visualized by the Lagrangian dynamics of micrometer-sized solid particles, see e.g. La Mantia and Skrbek, PRB 90, 014519 (2014).
Superfluidity and quantized vortices in 4 He and 3 He-B 4 He 3 He-B Phase diagrams Bose condensation of helium atoms Origin of superfluidity Bose condensation of Cooper pairs T λ 2.17 K κ = 2π 0.997 10 7 m 2 m 4 s Transition temperature Quantum of circulation T c 1 mk κ = 2π 0.662 10 7 m 2 2m 3 s We will be interested in dynamics of quantized vortex lines and associated flow field at temperatures T c so that the normal fluid can be neglected.
Quantum turbulence in the zero temperature limit Each vortex moves in a collective flow field of all other vortices = complex dynamics, accompanied by vortex reconnections = vortex tangle (quantum turbulence) 10-4 Regimes and spectra of quantum turbulence Quasiclassical Ultraquantum 10 3 Intencity of quantum turbulence is characterized by the vortex line density, L [m 2 ] total length of vortex lines per unit volume Energy spectrum, E(k) [arb.] 10-5 k -5/3 10-6 k -1 10-7 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 Wavenumber, k [m -1 ] Large-scale flow E(k) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 k No large-scale flow. The only length scale is the intervortex distance.
Detection and visualization of quantum turbulence 4 He: 1K T T λ 2.17 K 3 He-B: N/A for 0.25T c < T < T c Second sound PIV and PTV (Particle Tracking) He 2 excimer molecules 4 He: T < 1 K He 2 excimer molecules Electron bubbles 3 He-B: T < 0.25T c Andreev reflection of quasiparticle thermal excitations (not yet a truly visualization technique) Advantages: 1) Non-invasive 2) in combination with numerical simulations, can be regarded as the visualization technique (in particular, allows to measure and interpret fluctuations of the vortex line density) Fisher et al., PRL 63 (1983); Fisher, Jackson, Sergeev, Tsepelin, PNAS 111 (2014)
Numerical simulation of the vortex tangle Governing equations v(r, t) = κ I 4π L r s r s ds, ds = v(s, t) 3 dt solved in the cubic box of size 1 mm using the vortex-filament method with periodic boundary conditions. Biot-Savart integrals are evaluated via a tree method. [Baggaley & Barenghi, PRB 84, 020504 (2011)] Evolution of the vortex line length Saturated, time-averaged line density in the statistically steady state: L = 9.7 10 7 m 2. [Baggaley, Tsepelin, Barenghi, Fisher, Pickett, Sergeev, and Suramlishvili, PRL 115, 015302 (2015) Note: the simulated tangle is quasiclassical 10-4 Tangle is generated by vortex loops (radius 200 µm) injected at a frequency f i = 10 Hz. To insure isotropy, the loop injection plane is switched at both corners at frequency f i = 3.3 Hz. Energy spectrum, E(k) [arb.] 10-5 k -5/3 10-6 k -1 10-7 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 Wavenumber, k [m -1 ]
Thermal quasiparticle excitations. Andreev scattering Quiescent fluid E = qǫ 2p + 2, where ǫ p = p2 2m ǫf superfluid energy gap; ǫ F Fermi energy; p F Fermi momentum At T T c excitation propagate ballistically (mean free path size of experimental cell) Flowing 3 He-B (e.g. quantized vortex) E(p) E(p) + p v (Galilean transformation) v S = 0 E v S E p p particle flux hole flux total flux particle shadow hole shadow total shadow v S = 0 E v S E p p Quasiparticles: ǫ p > 0 Quasiholes: ǫ p < 0 [effective potential barrier: U eff = + p v(r)] Fisher et al., PRL 63 (1983); Fisher, Jackson, Sergeev, Tsepelin, PNAS 111 (2014) Any momentum transfer between excitations and superfluid is minimal = the reflected excitations almost exactly retrace the path of incoming quasiparticles
Experimental arrangements (Lancaster) Sketch of experiment... vortex tangle quasiparticle b source wire
Experimental arrangements (Lancaster) Sketch of experiment...... and its realization vortex tangle B~ quasiparticle b 60m m T1 m 5 mm source wire
Andreev reflection of quasiparticle excitations by the vortex tangle Quasiparticle flux incident in the x-direction on the (y, z)-side of the computational cell: Z hnvg ii(y,z) = g (E )f (E )vg (E ) de A 2D map of Andreev reflection by the tangle [g (E ) density of states, f (E ) Fermi distribution function] Quasiparticle flux transmitted through the tangle: hnvg it(y,z) = g (pf ) The fraction of quasiparticles Andreev-reflected by a tangle along x-direction at position (y, z): «pf Vxmax fy,z = 1 exp kb T Z exp( E /kb T ) de [Baggaley, Tsepelin, Barenghi, Fisher, Pickett, Sergeev, Suramlishvili, PRL 115 015302 (2015)] A 100% B +pf Vxmax [g (pf ) density of momentum states at the Fermi energy] Vxmax the highest superfluid velocity encountered along the quasiparticle s trajectory 0% (A) Quasiparticle reflection (B) Quasihole reflection The extended regions of high reflectivity (darker) and low reflectivity (lighter) illustrate the distribution of the large-scale flows
Total Andreev reflection Total reflection f R = f y,z (averaged over (y, z)-plane) The results for quasiparticles and quasiholes are combined to yield the reflection for a full thermal beam 0.4 Numerical simulation Experimental measurements of Andreev reflection from vortices generated by the vibrating grid Andreev reflection coefficient, f R Andreev reflection coefficient, f R 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Vortex line density, L, 10 8 m -2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 #3 #2 #1 Onset of Quantum Turbulence Grid wire #1 wire #2 wire #3 4.3bar, 0.17 T c 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Grid velocity amplitude, mm s -1 Slower rise of f R for L 2 10 7 m 2 is due to the screening effects Numerical and experimental data have similar shape, but beware: the onset of turbulence is slightly different in simulations and in the experiment Plateau at large velocities/tangle densities: in experiment results from the extra creation of excitations as the grid approaches 1/3 of the Landau critical velocity, in simulation is due to a larger screening Baggaley, Tsepelin, Barenghi, Fisher, Pickett, Sergeev, Suramlishvili, PRL 115, 015302 (2015)
Spectral properties of fluctuations: Andreev reflection vs quantum turbulence Statistically steady state Equilibrium, time-averaged values: L = 9.7 10 7 m 2, f R = 0.37 Fluctuations: δl(t) = L(t) L, δf R(t) = f R(t) f R Power spectral densities (PSD) of the Andreev reflection for numerical simulations and experimental observations PSD of the simulated Andreev reflection and the simulated line density PSD Andreev reflection (arb. units) PSD of Andreev reflection (arb. units) 10 7 10 5 10 3 Simulation Tangle Vortex rings f -5/3 101 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 Frequency, Hz 10 8 10 6 10 4 Cross correlation of δl and δf R 0.8 0.4 0 102 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 Frequency, Hz f -3 400 200 0 200 400 Time, s Baggaley, Tsepelin, Barenghi, Fisher, Pickett, Sergeev, Suramlishvili, PRL 115, 015302 (2015) f -5/3 f -3 f -5/3 PSD Vortex line density (arb. units) f 3 scaling corresponds to the Andreev reflection on length scales smaller than the intervortex distance high f line density spectrum dominated by unpolarized, random vortex lines = f 5/3 medium f line density spectrum dominated by large scale flows generated by polarized vortex lines = f 3 cross-over at frequency f l κ/(2πl) 1 Hz corresponding to the intervortex distance The fluctuations of the vortex line density and of the Andreev reflection are well correlated. However, their spectral densities behave differently: for large scale flows the line density spectrum scales as f 3 while that of Andreev reflection as f 5/3 ; for an unpolarized tangle the scalings are reversed.
... more comments and conclusions The Andreev reflectance of a vortex tangle does indeed reveal the nature of quantum turbulence. The f 5/3 scaling of the frequency spectrum of the Andreev-retro-reflected signal has been observed earlier in the experiments of the Lancaster ULT group [e.g. Bradley et al., PRL 101, 065302 (2008)] where it was argued that fluctuations of the reflected signal can be interpreted as fluctuations of the vortex line density. The Andreev reflection technique has great potential for elucidating the behavior of pure quantum turbulence.