arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 31 Dec 2001

Similar documents
Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Overview of High-Luminosity Background Extrapolations Methodology of Background Characterization

Results from BABAR/PEP-II - One Year of Operations

THE PEP-II B-FACTORY AND THE BABAR DETECTOR

BABAR Beam Background Simulation Steven Robertson

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

The BABAR Electromagnetic Calorimeter: Status and Performance Improvements

1 Introduction The SLAC B Factory asymmetric B-factories was approved by President Clinton in October B-factories The inaugural meeting of the d

LHCb Calorimetry Impact

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

Calibration of the BABAR CsI (Tl) calorimeter

Physics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC

The HL-LHC physics program

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

arxiv:physics/ v1 22 Dec 2003

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Recent results on exclusive hadronic cross sections measurements with the BABAR detector

LHCb: From the detector to the first physics results

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)508. CMS Detector: Performance Results. Speaker. I. Redondo * CIEMAT

Status of PEP-II and BaBar. 1 Introduction. 2 PEP-II Machine

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

pp physics, RWTH, WS 2003/04, T.Hebbeker

Performance and Aging of the BABAR Drift Chamber

Commissioning of the ATLAS LAr Calorimeter

Figure 1: Elevation view of the BABAR Detector.

Machine-Detector Interface for the CEPC

Particle Acceleration

CMS Note Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

Upgrade of the CMS Forward Calorimetry

The ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker

The LHC Experiments. TASI Lecture 2 John Conway

Wolfgang Gradl. on behalf of the BABAR collaboration. Tau 2016, Beijing 23 rd September 2016

Using Geant4 in the BABAR Simulation

Muon Alignment at CMS

Interaction of particles in matter

CEPC Detector and Physics Studies

Flavour Physics at LHC

Usage of GEANT 4 versions: 6, 7 & 8 in BABAR

Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC era

OPERATIONS & PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS DETECTOR IN LHC RUN II

CMS: Tracking in a State of Art Experiment

Particle detection 1

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING CHARGE AND MOMENTUM OF ELECTRONS AND POSITRONS USING CALORIMETRY AND SILICON TRACKING. Qun Fan & Arie Bodek

First light from. Gagan Mohanty

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

Level 3 Trigger. First Joint Belle-BaBar Workshop on Detector Issues TRIUMF, Vancouver. Feburary 15, Rainer Bartoldus. The University of Iowa

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

LHC status and upgrade plan (physics & detector) 17 3/30 Yosuke Takubo (KEK)

The Mystery of Vus from Tau decays. Swagato Banerjee

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

HL-LHC Physics with CMS Paolo Giacomelli (INFN Bologna) Plenary ECFA meeting Friday, November 23rd, 2012

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

Luminosity determination in pp collisions using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

Super KEKB and Belle II: Status of the KEK Super B Factory

The BaBar Detectorat theslac B-Factory

Current Status of Luminosity Measurement with the CMD-3 Detector at the VEPP-2000 e + e collider

Guest Lecture PHY 7361: Harnessing Cherenkov Radiation SteveSekula, 13 April 2010 (created 9 April 2010)

What detectors measure

Early physics with the LHCb detector

Belle/Belle II CsI(T l ) electromagnetic calorimeter

CMS ECAL status and performance with the first LHC collisions

Beam loss background and collimator design in CEPC double ring scheme

The BaBar CsI(Tl) Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Particle Detectors : an introduction. Erik Adli/Are Strandlie, University of Oslo, August 2017, v2.3

CMS Conference Report

Measurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)565. Study of the radiative tau decays τ γlνν with the BABAR detector. Roger Barlow

CLEO c. Anders Ryd Cornell University June 7, e e cc D D. D K,D K e

Status of the LHCb Experiment. Ueli Strauman, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Sept. 13, 2001

K + Physics at J-PARC

Simulation of PEP-II Accelerator Backgrounds Using TURTLE

Introduction. Tau leptons. SLHC. Summary. Muons. Scott S. Snyder Brookhaven National Laboratory ILC Physics and Detector workshop Snowmass, Aug 2005

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

PoS(Vertex 2016)004. ATLAS IBL operational experience

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

2008 JINST 3 S Outlook. Chapter 11

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

Study of e + e annihilation to hadrons at low energies at BABAR

Machine Detector Interface at Electron Colliders. Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing)

Instrumentation for Flavor Physics - Lesson I

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

Brief Report from the Tevatron. 1 Introduction. Manfred Paulini Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California 94720

Hadronic Cross Section Measurements at BES-III Sven Schumann Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

Luminosity Determination

Performance of New and Upgraded Detectors for Luminosity and Beam Condition Measurement at CMS

Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the Linear Collider using GEM Technology

Update on SVT Background rates using Bruno simulation

Measurement of Collins Asymmetries in the inclusive production of hadron pairs

A-Exam: The Rare B s µ + µ decay and tanβ

PHI PSI 08. Federico Nguyen. International Workshop on e+e- collisions from Phi to Psi

A glance at LHC Detector Systems. Burkhard Schmidt, CERN PH-DT

CESR and CLEO. Lepton Photon 99 Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University. Klaus Honscheid, LP 99 1

Tevatron Detector Upgrades

Compact Muon Solenoid Surapat Ek-In École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Electron Identification

Detectors & Beams. Giuliano Franchetti and Alberica Toia Goethe University Frankfurt GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Will LHCb be running during the HL-LHC era? Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration

Tevatron Experimental Issues at High Luminosities

Transcription:

DETECTORS AS A FUNCTION OF LUMINOSITY AT e + e MACHINES G. Eigen Dept. of Physics, University of Bergen, Allegaten 55, N-7 Bergen, Norway E-mail: eigen@asfys.fi.uib.no The performance of silicon-strip vertex detectors, drift chambers, CsI(Tl) electromagnetic calorimeters, and level- triggers used in present multipurpose detectors like BABAR is discussed in the context of operations in a high-luminosity environment. arxiv:hep-ex/v Dec Introduction The successful start of the asymmetric B-factories last year has triggered discussions on physics accessible at luminosities of L = 5 6 cm s. Since such luminosities are technically feasible, questions have been raised, how subsystems of present multipurpose detectors like BABAR would perform in such a high-luminosity environment. This article presents a look at the impact of machine-related backgrounds on silicon-vertex detectors, drift chambers, CsI(Tl) electromagnetic calorimeters and level- (L) trigger rates. Results are based on a BABAR study, which was facilitated to cope with the planned PEP II luminosity upgrade relying on the experience with the response of BABAR to machine-related backgrounds in the first year of running. The data were parameterized in terms of first or second-order polynomials of beam currents and luminosity. For many measurements a linear dependence was already sufficient. In this article extrapolations are considered for three luminosity points: L =.65 cm s,.5 cm s, and 5 cm s. Expectations for the first two luminosity points are taken from the BABAR study,, while those for the third luminosity point represent my personal view. Without new data, I consider extrapolations to luminosities beyond L > 5 cm s unrealistic, because of large extrapolation uncertainties and additional backgrounds such as luminosity lifetime that become important at very high luminosities. 5 All extrapolations are based on the PEP II interaction region (IR) layout and bear a systematic error of at least a factor of two. It is not trivial to predict background levels in other IR layouts, such as that of KEK B. The detector subsystems are subjected to different machine-related backgrounds. Electrons produce lostparticle backgrounds from beam-gas bremsstrahlung and Coulomb scattering in addition to synchrotron radiation. Positrons just produce lost-particle backgrounds from beam-gas bremsstrahlung. In addition, the interaction of the two beams yield further backgrounds. In the noncolliding mode a beam-gas cross term contributes, while in colliding mode further backgrounds originate from luminosity and beam-beam tails. Silicon Vertex Detectors Silicon vertex detectors, located closest to the beam, are exposed to high levels of radiation. The specific radiation dose depends both on beam currents and on the IR layout. For example, radiation levels at PEP II are expected to be higher than those at KEK B. In the BABAR detector the horizontal plane is most affected. While the low-energy ring () produces high radiation levels in the forward-east region (FE-MID) of the detector, the high-energy ring () affects the backward-west region (BW-MID). The dose rates in terms of beam currents (in units of [A]) are expected to be: D SVT [krad/y] = 8 I + 6 I D SVT [krad/y] = 6 I + 9. I (FE MID), (BW MID). () For other regions the radiation dose is about a factor of ten smaller. Table lists dose rates expected in the FE and BW regions of the horizontal plane for the three luminosity points. Figure shows the total dose predictions for the BABAR silicon vertex tracker (SVT) in the high-radiation regions as a function of beam currents. Presently, the SVT is expected to survive a total dose of MRad. Thus, with replacement of detectors in the horizontal plane the BABAR SVT should be operational at luminosities of L =.5 cm s. Radiation studies of microstrip detectors in the AT- LAS semiconductor tracker (SCT) have demonstrated that silicon strip detectors can survive very high radiation levels in hadronic environments, if p + nn + detectors are used that are cooled. Before irradiation the depletion layer is formed between the p + n junction. Highlevels of ionization radiation effectively change the n-type silicon to p-type. The depletion layer is shifted to the newly-formed p n + junction. Since for cost reasons detectors are readout on the p + side, the shifting depletion layer causes a loss in signal. This design also introduces a substantial amount of material in front of subsequent detectors because of cooling and the need for twice as many layers as in a double-sided detector design, thus yielding increased multiple scattering. Though the AT- LAS design is expected to work in high-luminosity e + e

FE:MID Int. Dose / krad BE:TOP Int. Dose / krad 5 5 5 5 5.8 A.5/.8 A (a) (c).5 A.75/.5 A.8 A./.8 A.8 A./.8 A.5 A./.5 A.7 A./.7 A BW:MID Int. Dose / krad.5 A (b).75 A Figure : Integrated-dose predictions for the BABAR SVT in the horizontal plane versus peak beam currents, (a) for forward east region exposed to, (b) for backward west region exposed to, and (c) for top/bottom region exposed to both beams. colliders, this needs to be checked in appropriate radiation studies. Drift Chambers The operation of drift chambers (DCH) is affected by machine backgrounds in three ways. First, the total current in the drift chamber drawn by the wires is dominated by the charge released by beam-related showers. This current is limited by the high-voltage system. Above this limit the chamber becomes non-operational. Though the limit can be increased by adding power supplies, high currents also contribute to the aging of the drift chamber. Permanent damage is expected to occur at chargedensities Q max >. Cb/cm of wire. Second, the occupancy in the drift chamber due to backgrounds can hamper the reconstruction of physics events. Third, ionization radiation can permanently damage read-out electronics and digitizing electronics. Drift chamber currents are of highest concern. Figure shows the total drift chamber current as functions of and currents for a DCH high voltage of U = 9 V. The data in the top left plot were fitted with a parabolic I dependence using all points and both linear and parabolic I dependences using points. A. A. A. A above 7 ma. For parameterizations in terms of I (top-right plot) both linear and linear plus quadratic dependences for points above 5 ma were used. The best descriptions of the high-current regions are found for the linear plus quadratic parameterizations which discard low-current data. The effect of two beams in collision and out-of collision on I DCH is shown in the bottom plots of Figure, confirming the presence of a beam-gas cross term and luminosity-related backgrounds. Including all effects the total DCH current is parameterized by: I DCH [µa] = 5. I +.5 I + 77. I +6. I +.9 L, () where beam currents and luminosity are given in units of [A] and [ cm s ], respectively. For U = 96 V, drift chamber currents scale with a factor of.67. The drift chamber occupancy at 9 V is parameterized by: N DCH [%] =. +.9 I +. I +. I +. I +.7 L. () Figure shows the measured DCH occupancy in BABAR for high voltages of U = 9 V and U = 96 V. Due to the large spread of data points an extrapolation to high drift chamber currents bears large uncertainties. Table lists extrapolations of the total drift chamber current, occupancy and charge density on a wire for the three luminosity points. At L = 5 cm s, I DCH becomes large. For higher luminosities I DCH basically just scales with L. In addition, an effect from the luminosity lifetime is expected. 5 The total DCH current definitely exceeds the tolerable limit. Thus, a drift chamber will not be operational and one needs to explore other technologies. One possibility is the use solid state devices which could be integrated with the vertex detector. As mentioned before multiple scattering is an issue here. But since solid state devices have much better resolutions than drift chambers, a reduced number of layers with thin detectors may be acceptable. However, a detailed study needs to be devoted on this issue. CsI(Tl) based Electromagnetic Calorimeters For a thallium-doped CsI crystal calorimeter radiation damage and occupancy are the main issues. Figure shows gain changes in crystals located in forward and backward regions of the BABAR electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC). Forward endcap crystals, located closest to the beams and thus affected most by radiation, show a gain loss of 6% in the worst case. The corresponding light-yield reductions for the worst crystals in the forward barrel and backward barrel are.5% and

9 8 7 6 5 linear + quadratic (all points) linear + quadratic, > 7 ma linear, > 7 ma 9 8 7 6 5 linear + quadratic, > 5 ma linear, > 5 ma 6 8 5 5 75 5 5 current [ma] current [ma] const ~ 6 ma 5 5 75 5 5 const ~ ma 75 in collision 75 in collision 5 out of collision 5 out of collision 5 single beams 5 single beams 6 8 current [ma] current [ma] Digis (Q > 5) 9V 6 8 (µa) DCH occupancy vs. current Figure : BABAR DCH occupancy as a function of I DCH for U = 9 V (solid points) and U = 96 V (open points). 96V Figure : BABAR DCH currents versus beam currents, top plots for single-beam operation and bottom plots for two-beam operations. Solid points (open circles) in bottom plots show I DCH for two beams in (out of) collision. The asterisk data points show the uncorrelated contributions from both beams. %, respectively. These observations are consistent with the different background levels expected in these regions. Figure 5 shows BABAR data for the occupancy of crystals with energies above MeV and for the number of crystals recording more than MeV as a function of beam currents. Parameterizations in terms of beam currents ([A]) and luminosity ([ cm s ]) yield: O (E> MeV) [%] = 9.8 +. (I + I ) +. L, N (E> MeV) =.7 I +. I +. I +. I +.6 L. () Note, that for L > cm s the luminosity contribution is expected to be dominant. Extrapolations of O (E> MeV) and N (E> MeV) for the three luminosity points are presented in Table. For luminosities of L <.5 cm s the integrated radiation dose for CsI(Tl) crystals should be no problem, if observed light losses scale as expected. The impact of the large number of low-energy photons on the EMC energy resolution needs to be studied. It depends on the clustering algorithm and on digital filtering. Background rates can be reduced by improvements of the vacuum near the IR combined with effective collimation against e + from distant Coulomb scattering. For lumi- Figure : Gain changes of BABAR CsI(Tl) crystals in forward endcap, forward barrel and backward barrel versus time. nosities of L > 5 cm s, however, light losses due to radiation damage become substantial and high occupancy levels severely hamper the performance. Therefore, present CsI(Tl) crystals are not suitable. Other scintillators, such as pure CsI crystals, need to be considered and an R&D program needs to be established. 5 Level Trigger The level trigger rate scales linearly both with beam currents and with luminosity: L [Hz] = (cosmics)+ I +6 I +7 L. (5) Extrapolations for the three luminosity points are shown in Table. The L trigger rate measured in BABAR as a function of beam currents is plotted in Figure 6. The plot on the right shows a comparison of single beam operation (bottom), two-beam operation out of collision (middle)

Single Crystal Occupancy above threshold (%) 5 single-beam data single-beam data Number of crystals above MeV 7 6 5 E > MeV single-beam data single-beam data L Rate (Hz) only L Rate (Hz) 6 + ma in collision + ma out of collision only 9 6 8 6 Beam Current (ma) 6 8 6 Beam Current (ma) current (ma) 6 current (ma) Figure 6: The L trigger rate versus I (left) and I (right). Collisions data (I_ = ma) Collisions data (I_ = ma) Single Crystal Occupancy above threshold (%) 8 6 Beams in collision Beams separated single beam data Number of crystals above MeV 9 8 7 6 5 Beams in collision Beams separated single beam data Table : Extrapolations of dose rates in silicon vertex detectors, total current, occupancy, and charge density in drift chambers, occupancy of crystals with E > MeV and number of crystals with E > MeV in CsI(TL) calorimeters, and L trigger rate. L peak [cm s ] 6.5.5 5. Ldt [fb ] 55 I /I [A].8/..7/..6/.5 8 6 7 8 9 Current (ma) 6 7 8 9 Current (ma) D SVT [krad/y] 8/8 69/ /9 Figure 5: Average occupancy of BABAR EMC crystals above a MeV energy readout threshold (left) and the number of crystals containing more than MeV (right) versus beam currents. Top plots show single-beam data and bottom plots show the I dependence for fixed I = ma. The upper (lower) curves in bottom plots show fits for beams in (out of) collision. and two-beam operation in collision (top). For luminosities above.5 cm s the BABAR trigger needs to be upgraded to cope with the increased trigger rates. The L trigger rate at very high luminosities could be reduced by implementing a rather stringent prescaling of Bhabhas, radiative Bhabhas and beam-gas backgrounds. This requires an appropriate tracking device used in the trigger. However, LHC experiments operating at a bunch crossing of MHz are designed to accept an L trigger rate of khz. 6 Conclusions For tracking and electromagnetic energy measurements other technologies need to be investigated. For silicon vertex detectors further radiation studies are needed. In order to have workable solutions for each subsystems ready, serious R&D has to start soon. A conventional muon system and a DIRC particle identification system with proper shielding are expected to work at luminosities above 5 cm s. I DCH [µa] 68 5 N DCH [%]. 5 Q DCH [mcb/cm] 5 5 > O (E> MeV) [%] 8 9 N (E > MeV) 56 L [Hz] 5 8 Acknowledgments I would like to thank W. Kozanecki D. MacFarlane and B. Stugu for useful discussions. This work has been supported by the Research Council of Norway. References. See e.g. articles by J. Alexander, K. Abe, Y. Kwon, S. Petrak, A. Falk, and J. Lee in these proceedings.. C. Hast et al, BaBar Note 5, pp, ().. L. Andricek et al, Nuc.Ins.Meth. A9, 8 (998).. G. Lutz, Semiconductor Radiation Detectors, Springer Verlag (999). 5. M. Sullivan, talk at Beyond e + e Workshop, Homestead, MI, June 6-8 ().

arxiv:hep-ex/v Dec Scientific/Technical Report No. -7 DETECTORS AS A FUNCTION OF LUMINOSITY AT e + e MACHINES G. Eigen Department of Physics University of Bergen ISSN 8-696 Abstract The performance of present multipurpose detectors at high luminosities is discussed. Invited talk at th International Symposium on B-Physics and CP Violation, Ise-Shima, Japan, February 9-,.