Characterisation & Use of Array Spectrometers

Similar documents
Stray Light Rejection in Array Spectrometers

REFERENCE SPECTROMETRY FOR CALIBRATION OF OPTICAL EARTH OBSERVATION SYSTEMS

THE MEASUREMENT OF SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET SPECTRAL IRRADIANCE PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS

2001 Spectrometers. Instrument Machinery. Movies from this presentation can be access at

25 Instruments for Optical Spectrometry

CHEM*3440. Photon Energy Units. Spectrum of Electromagnetic Radiation. Chemical Instrumentation. Spectroscopic Experimental Concept.

Brewer UV measurement and calibration

Because light behaves like a wave, we can describe it in one of two ways by its wavelength or by its frequency.

Overview of Spectroscopy

Spectroscopy. Page 1 of 8 L.Pillay (2012)

Optical Measurement Guidelines for High-Power LEDs and Solid State Lighting Products

High Resolution Optical Spectroscopy

Introduction to FT-IR Spectroscopy

Astronomy 203 practice final examination

Estimating the spectral response function of the CASI-2

Reference literature. (See: CHEM 2470 notes, Module 8 Textbook 6th ed., Chapters )

Laser induced fluorescence

Analytical Spectroscopy Review

Solar irradiance measurement up to 2500nm with the Arcoptix FT-NIR

Characterization and Calibration of a Fourier Transform Spectroradiometer for Solar UV Irradiance Measurements

Problem Solving. radians. 180 radians Stars & Elementary Astrophysics: Introduction Press F1 for Help 41. f s. picture. equation.

Spectroscopy: Introduction. Required reading Chapter 18 (pages ) Chapter 20 (pages )

Instrumental Analysis: Spectrophotometric Methods

Short Term Scientific Mission Report COST Action OPTIMISE: ES1309

PRACTICAL UNCERTAINTY BUDGETS FOR SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF LEDS

HARP Assessment of Uncertainty

Chapter 13 An Introduction to Ultraviolet/Visible Molecular Absorption Spectrometry

Spectrophotometric calibration system for DECam

Analysis of Stray Light in a Brewer Spectrophotometer Brewers are not Perfect!

Visible spectrum 1. Spectroscope. Name:

Calibration of Ocean Colour Sensors

Calibration of instruments measuring broadband and spectral solar (UV) irradiance

MERIS US Workshop. Instrument Characterization Overview. Steven Delwart

Reduction procedure of long-slit optical spectra. Astrophysical observatory of Asiago

Course Details. Analytical Techniques Based on Optical Spectroscopy. Course Details. Textbook. SCCH 211: Analytical Chemistry I

UV Fluorescence from Integrating Spheres Measurement and Theory

Spectroscopic studies of impurities in the LHD plasmas

The Planetary Nebula Spectrograph

EXPOSURE TIME ESTIMATION

Compact Knowledge: Absorbance Spectrophotometry. Flexible. Reliable. Personal.

SOME ASPECTS OF PYROMETRY OF "WHITE" OBJECTS V.E.

Traceable UV-Vis Reference Materials

Spatial Stray Light Correction for Imaging Instruments Using Matrix Method Yuqin Zong

USE OF A LOW-COST SILICON DIODE-ARRAY SPECTRORADIOMETER TO MEASURE SOLAR UV-B

SOLSPEC MEASUREMENT OF THE SOLAR ABSOLUTE SPECTRAL IRRADIANCE FROM 165 to 2900 nm ON BOARD THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION

FLS980 Series Reference Guide

Optical Properties of Binoculars and Telescopes Relevant to Laser Safety

Diffraction gratings. B.Tech-I

9/28/10. Visible and Ultraviolet Molecular Spectroscopy - (S-H-C Chapters 13-14) Valence Electronic Structure. n σ* transitions

EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY

Integrating Spheres in Molecular Spectrophotometry

Hanle Echelle Spectrograph (HESP)

NIRSpec Performance Report NPR / ESA-JWST-RP Authors: T. Böker, S. Birkmann & P. Ferruit Date of Issue: 20.5.

Novel Flux Calibration Source. CORM 2007 David C. Gross May 10, 2007

ARC SPECTRUM OF IRON /COPPER / BRASS

JABLONSKI DIAGRAM 2/15/16

n ( λ ) is observed. Further, the bandgap of the ZnTe semiconductor is

Use of a High-Resolution Overview Spectrometer for the Visible Range in the TEXTOR Boundary Plasma

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 19 Chapter 12. Chem 4631

JABLONSKI DIAGRAM INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LIGHT AND MATTER LIGHT AS A WAVE LIGHT AS A PARTICLE 2/1/16. Photoelectric effect Absorp<on Emission ScaDering

Spectral and photopic studies for high intensity discharge (HID) lamps

Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ECE318S Fundamentals of Optics. Final Exam. April 16, 2007.

Calibration demonstration system for an imaging spectrometer to provide climatequality

Astronomical frequency comb for calibration of low and medium resolution spectrographs

Overview: Astronomical Spectroscopy

Spectral Calibration of Ultra- High Resolution Volume Holographic Spectrometer. Jeff Bourne Majid Badiei (Advisor)

Chemistry 524--Final Exam--Keiderling May 4, :30 -?? pm SES

Emissivity, Reflectivity and Transmissivity of Semitransparent Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composites

Spectroscopy. Experimental Optics. Contact: Lisa Kaden Malte Siems

estec NIRSpec Technical Note NTN Spectral intensity of the MSA glow sources Abstract:

Quality Manual of Reference Spectrometer Laboratory

LDLS Laser-Driven Light Source

A very versatile, large A-omega, fibre-fed spectrograph design. Ian Parry IoA, Cambridge

Transvision: a Light Transmission Measurement System for Greenhouse Covering Materials

Spectrophotometry. Dr. Shareef SHAIK ASST. PROFESSOR Pharmacology

Progress Towards an Absolute Calibration of Lunar Irradiance at Reflected Solar Wavelengths

Southern African Large Telescope. Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph. Instrument Acceptance Testing Plan

UV Degradation of Polycarbonate

Chemistry 524--Final Exam--Keiderling Dec. 12, pm SES

The Performance of the EUV Spectroscope (EXCEED) Onboard the SPRINT-A Mission

Physics 476LW Advanced Physics Laboratory Atomic Spectroscopy

Accurate Measurement of Transmittance and Reflectance for Engineering Applications

Some Topics in Optics

EUV Reflectivity measurements on Acktar Sample Magic Black

AS 101: Day Lab #2 Summer Spectroscopy

Centre for Electronic Imaging

Birefringence dispersion in a quartz crystal retrieved from a channelled spectrum resolved by a fibre-optic spectrometer

Application of Hydroxyl (OH) Radical Ultraviolet Absorption Spectroscopy to Rocket Plumes

Design and Development of a Smartphone Based Visible Spectrophotometer for Analytical Applications

Measuring the Redshift of M104 The Sombrero Galaxy

The TV3 ground calibrations of the WFC3 NIR grisms

IntelliCal FAQ Revised 9/27/12

10/2/2008. hc λ. νλ =c. proportional to frequency. Energy is inversely proportional to wavelength And is directly proportional to wavenumber

SCI. Scientific Computing International. Scientific Computing International. FilmTek. Raising Thin Film Metrology Performance to a New Level

RESULTS OF A NEW STRAYLIGHT CORRECTION FOR SCIAMACHY

Optical Spectrometers

EUV-Technology with Discharge EUV-Lamp"

Practical 1P4 Energy Levels and Band Gaps

Any first year text, sections on atomic structure, spectral lines and spectrometers

SOFIE Instrument Model and Performance Comparison

Transcription:

Characterisation & Use of Array Spectrometers Mike Shaw, Optical Technologies & Scientific Computing Team, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington Middlesex, UK 1

Overview Basic design and features of array spectrometers. Advantages and disadvantages of array spectrometers over scanning systems. Why are NPL using an array spectrometer? Some key performance characteristics and how to assess them. In system (heterochromatic) stray light: what causes it and how to measure it. Stray light reduction using blocking filters. Future work and conclusions. 2

Basic optical layout of an array spectrometer Entrance slit Collimating mirror Diffraction grating Detector array Focussing mirror 3

Features of array Spectrometers Input optics: Optical fibre Optical layout Transmissive and reflective diffraction gratings Lenses and mirrors Internal baffles and size of housing Detector array Different photosensitive elements depending upon wavelength range Different no. of array elements and overall size of array Electronics 4

Why use an array spectrometer? Usually less accurate than scanning monochromator based instruments. Offer three principal benefits over scanning systems: Speed (multiple wavelengths measured simultaneously). Size (usually much smaller and lighter than scanning systems). Cost (typically much cheaper). 5

Why are NPL using an array spectrometer? To develop a new capability to measure the spectral output of light sources. Need to use an array spectrometer to carry out measurements in a reasonable amount of time. Spectral radiant intensity distribution, I(λ) Total spectral radiant flux, Φ( λ) = I( λ) dω 4π 6

Some key performance characteristics Wavelength accuracy Spectral resolution Linearity Responsivity Stray light There are also many other important performance parameters including those relating to the detector array itself such as uniformity, well capacity, noise, etc. 7

1. Wavelength accuracy Measured using emission lamps or laser lines. Accuracy depends upon calibration method and type of function used to fit pixel no. to wavelength. Output of a Mercury Neon Emission Lamp Measured Using an Array Spectrometer Signal (counts) 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 8

2. Spectral resolution Resolution depends upon the size of the spectrometer entrance slit & pixel bandwidth dispersion at focal plane x pixel width. May vary across the detector array. Output of a 532 nm Laser Measured Using an Array Spectrometer 45000 40000 35000 Signal (counts) 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0-5000 525 527 529 531 533 535 537 539 9

3. Linearity Best measured using double aperture method or via comparison with a detector of known linearity (e.g. high quality silicon photodiode or trap). Although single element photodiodes may be extremely linear the same does not necessary hold for detector arrays made using the same photosensitive material. Need to assess linearity with respect to irradiance and exposure time and also look at wavelength dependence. Typical non-linearity errors for silicon CCDs are O(10-3 ) or less for a 2:1 step in irradiance but much larger errors have been observed for other devices. 10

4. Responsivity Depends upon many factors including: type of detector array, size of entrance slit, grating efficiency, coupling into spectrograph. Spectral variation in responsivity also effects stray light errors. Responsivity calibration of a linear detector array 11

5. In System (heterochromatic) stray light Often the dominant source of uncertainty in measurements made using compact array spectrometers. Scattering, and interreflections from the optics, housing and detector array and inadequate blocking of higher diffracted orders cause rays to strike parts of the detector array corresponding to different wavelengths. 12

Stray light signal observed using a laser line Dark Corrected measured signal (normalised to max) 1.E+00 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Pixel no. Measured Spectra Ideal spectra Background due to heterochromatic stray light These results could be used to state that stray light rejection is < 10-5 some distance away from the centre wavelength of the laser line. 13

Stray light errors are source dependent http://www.promolux.com/english/faq.html http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/h/ AE_high-pressure_sodium_lamp.html http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/tlauwers/pr ojects.html http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=light_bulb Spectral Total Flux of a Fluorescent Lamp Spectral Total Flux of a High Pressure Sodium Lamp Relative SPD of Four LEDs Spectral Total Flux of a Tungsten Halogen Lamp 450 0.06 1.20E+03 0.03 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 1.00E+03 8.00E+02 6.00E+02 4.00E+02 2.00E+02 LED1 LED2 LED3 LED4 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 0.00E+00 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 Stray light errors tend to be most critical when measuring a broadband spectrum with an intensity varying over several orders of magnitude, e.g. a quartz tungsten lamp. 14

Spectral Total Flux of a Tungsten Halogen Lamp Stray Light Errors for an incandescent source 0.03 0.025 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 Relatively low spectral flux at shorter visible and UV wavelengths 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 Relatively high spectral flux at longer visible and NIR wavelengths 15

Stray Light Errors for an incandescent source Spectral Total Flux of a Tungsten Halogen Lamp 0.03 0.025 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 W avelength (nm ) Small fraction of radiation inside the spectrometer is measured as heterochromatic stray light 16

Measuring stray light signals from a broadband light source Fibre input to spectrometer Background corrected Signal Measured from a Quartz Tungsten Lamp 1.E+07 Measurement of lamp signal, V lamp (λ) Background corrected signal (counts) 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 300 400 500 600 700 800 17

Measuring stray light signals from a broadband light source Measurement through cut on filter, V filter (λ) Fibre input to spectrometer Background corrected Signal Measured from a Quartz Tungsten Lamp Through a GG435 cut on Filter 1.E+07 Transmittance (%) Nominal transmittance of GG435 (3mm thickness) cut on filter 1.E+00 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-04 Background corrected signal (counts) 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 300 400 500 600 700 800 18

Measuring stray light signals from a broadband light source Shutter to block light source from spectrometer field of view Fibre input to spectrometer Background Signal 1.E+07 Measurement of background signal, V bg (λ) signal (counts) 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 19

Analysis of Stray Light Data For an ideal spectrometer: T filter ( λ) = V V filter lamp ( λ) V ( λ) V bg bg ( λ) ( λ) Stray light signals cause deviations from ideal behaviour and indicate erroneously high filter transmittance at wavelengths shorter than the cut on. Transmittance (%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Transmittance of GG435 glass filter (3mm thickness) 260 300 340 380 420 460 500 540 580 Measured using array spectrometer Nominal Stray light error of > 90%! 20

Analysis of stray light data By making some simplifying assumptions, the fractional stray light error when measuring unfiltered source can be approximated as N SL /N Total Estimated stray light signal / total measured signal (%) Signal (counts) 10000000 1000000 100000 Estimated Fractional Stray Light Error in Measurement of the Output of a Quartz Tungsten 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Lamp using an Array Spectrometer 10000 1000 300 400 500 600 700 800 Dark Corrected Signal Measured From a Quartz Tungsten Lamp Through Two Cut on Filters Using an Array Spectrometer Dark corrected signal measured through GG435 Dark corrected signal measured through RG610 300 400 500 600 700 800 Stray light signal level N SL 21

Comparison of Different Array Detectors The cut on filter method provides a way to compare the performance of different array spectrometers for measuring the spectral irradiance from a broadband light source. Transmittance of GG435 measured using a quartz Tungsten lamp and different array detectors 100% Measured transmittance (%) 10% spectrometer A Spectrometer B Spectrometer C Spectrometer E Spectrometer F Spectrometer G Spectrometer H GG435 Nominal 1% 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 22

How to handle stray light? Live with it Correct for it Reduce it Determine stray light contribution to measurement uncertainty. Spectral Total Flux of a Tungsten Halogen Lamp 0.03 Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 Minimise the effect of stray light by calibrating the detector under conditions as close as possible to those under which it will be used. 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 Magnitude of stray light errors is too large for many applications. 23

How to handle stray light? Live with it Correct for it Reduce it Input laser radiation at different wavelengths into the array spectrometer to determine amount scattered onto each pixel as a function of wavelength stray light contribution to detector responsivity. Characterise the stray light rejection of the instrument and then correct for it. Dark Corrected measured signal (normalised to max) 1.E+00 Spectrum of HeNe Laser Measured Using Array Spectrometer 1.E-01 1.E-02 1.E-03 1.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Pixel no. S. W. Brown, B. C. Johnson, M. E. Feinholz, M. A. Yarbrough, S. J. Flora, K. R. Lykke, and D. K. Clark, Stray light correction algorithm for spectrographs, Metrologia 40, S81-83 (2003). Y. Zong, S. W. Brown, B. C. Johnson, K. R. Lykke, and Y. Ohno, Simple spectral stray light correction method for array spectroradiometers, Applied Optics, Vol 45 No. 6, 20 Feb 2006. 24

How to handle stray light? Live with it Correct for it Reduce it Use additional baffles inside spectrometer to block interreflections difficult to implement and many detectors are sealed. Use stray light blocking filters to limit the wavelengths of light reaching the detector array 25

Stray Light Blocking Filters Reduce the bandwidth of radiation reaching the spectrometer using bandpass filters. Spectral Total Flux of a Tungsten Halogen Lamp 0.03 Measure the spectrum over a reduced wavelength range without influence from stray light caused by scattering of other wavelengths. Spectral Total Flux (arb. units) 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 Different blocking filters incorporated into a filter wheel behind the spectrograph entrance slit. 26

Stray light blocking filters Target: to reduce the fractional stray light error in the measurement of the irradiance spectrum of a Quartz Tungsten lamp to < 1% over the range 300 nm to 800 nm. Use data from cut on filter measurements to estimate stray light level through theoretical filters. Stray light signal / total measured signal Transmittance (%) 100% 100.0% 90% 80% 70% 10.0% 60% 50% 40% 30% 1.0% 20% 10% Estimated Gaussian Fractional Transmittance Stray Light Profiles Errors Through of Four Four Theoretical Blocking Stray Light Filters Blocking Filters 0% 0.1% 300 400 500 600 700 800 filter 1 filter 2 filter 3 filter 4 no filter Filter 1 Filter 2 Filter 3 Filter 4 300 400 500 600 700 800 27

Choice of stray light blocking filters Look at effect of filter FWHM and CWL on predicted stray light error Gaussian Transmittance Profiles of Four Theoretical Blocking Filters 100% 90% 80% Transmittance (%) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Filter 1 Filter 2 Filter 3 Filter 4 0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 Theoretical filters with guassian transmittance 28

Real blocking filters Measured Transmittance of Four Real Blocking Filter Combinations 100% 90% 80% Transmittance (%) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% T Filter 1 T Filter 2 T Filter 3 T Filter 4 0% 300 400 500 600 700 800 Real filter combinations 29

Real blocking filters Estimated Fractional Stray Light Error Through Four Stray Light Blocking Filters 100.0% Stray light / total measured signal (%) 10.0% 1.0% No filter filter 1 filter 2 filter 3 filter 4 0.1% 300 400 500 600 700 800 Estimated stray light signals using real filters 30

Stray light tests using blocking filters Transmittance of GG435 (3mm) Measured Without Blocking Filters 100% 90% 80% 70% Transmittance (%) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nominal No blocking filter -10% 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 31

Stray light tests using blocking filters Significant reduction in 100% stray light signals 90% at short wavelengths. Transmittance (%) 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Transmittance of GG435 (3mm) Measured With Blocking Filters Small discrepancy between nominal & measured filter transmittance at longer wavelengths. Filt1 Filt2 Filt3 10% 0% Filt4 Nominal -10% 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 80 Increased noise at shorter wavelengths. 32

Limitations of using stray light blocking filters Increased measurement time. If using N blocking filters in a filter wheel then N different exposures are necessary + time to move filter wheel. Once filters have been selected and tested for suitability it may be possible to incorporate them onto the detector array allowing the spectrum to be acquired in a single exposure. Adding an additional element into the detector may result in additional interreflections and stray light. Slightly reduced detector sensitivity (not significant if filters are well chosen). Temperature effects (need to be aware of temperature sensitivity of filter transmittance). 33

Future work Development & increased automation of goniospectroradiometer facility. Validation of array spectroradiometer for measuring different source types. Intercomparison with existing integrating sphere facilities. 34

Conclusions Array spectrometers are extremely useful instruments, however they can suffer from significant errors if not well understood and characterised. In particular, stray light errors from array spectrometers may be several orders of magnitude larger than from traditional scanning double monochromator systems. NPL have modified an array spectrometer to incorporate a series of custom designed stray light blocking filters, with the effect that stray light errors have been reduced by 1-2 orders of magnitude for measurements of the irradiance from a quartz tungsten lamp. The array spectrometer has been integrated into a new goniospectroradiometric instrument for measurement of the radiant intensity distribution and total spectral flux of a range of different light sources. 35

Acknowledgements Thanks to colleagues in the optical technologies and scientific computing team at NPL and Teresa Goodman in particular for her help and advice. 36

Questions? Mike Shaw, Optical Technologies & Scientific Computing Team, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK Tel. 02089436646 Email. mike.shaw@npl.co.uk 37