This is the author s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Molla, Md. Mamun, Saha, Suvash C., & Hossain, Md. Anwar (11) Radiation effect on free convection laminar flow along a vertical flat plate with streamwise sinusoidal surface temperature. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 3(-6), pp. 131-1319. This file was downloaded from: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/11/ c Copyright 1 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice: Changes introduced as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing and formatting may not be reflected in this document. For a definitive version of this work, please refer to the published source: http://d.doi.org/1.116/j.mcm.1.1.17
Radiation effect on free convection laminar flow along a vertical flat plate with streamwise sinusoidal surface temperature Md. Mamun Molla 1, Suvash C. Saha *, Md. Anwar Hossain 3** 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, R3T V6,Canada. E-mail: molla@cc.umanitoba.ca School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 811, Australia Email: s_c_saha@yahoo.com 3 Department of Mathematics, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Islamabad, Pakistan *Corresponding author: Dr Suvash C. Saha, Email: s_c_saha@yahoo.com Tel: +61-7-779-73, Fa: +61-7-781-6788 Abstract: The effect of thermal radiation on a steady two-dimensional natural convection laminar flow of viscous incompressible optically thick fluid along a vertical flat plate with streamwise sinusoidal surface temperature has been investigated in this study. Using the appropriate variables; the basic governing equations are transformed to convenient form and then solved numerically employing two efficient methods, namely, Implicit finite difference method (IFD) together with Keller bo scheme and Straight forward finite difference (SFFD) method. Effects of the variation of the physical parameters, for eample, conduction-radiation parameter (Planck number), surface temperature parameter, and the amplitude of the surface temperature, are shown on the skin friction and heat transfer rate quantitatively are shown numerically. Velocity and temperature profiles as well as streamlines and isotherms are also presented and discussed for the variation of conduction-radiation parameter. It is found that both skinfriction and rate of heat transfer are enhanced considerably by increasing the values of conduction radiation parameter, R d. Keywords: Natural convection, radiation, sinusoidal surface temperature, vertical flat plate. **Former Professor of Mathematics, University of Dhaka; Email: anwar@univdhaka.edu
Nomenclature C p C f f g Gr Gr k l Nu Pr q r q c R d T T T w U u,v Specific heat at constant pressure Skin-friction coefficient Dimensionless stream function Acceleration due to gravity Grashof number Local Grashof number Thermal conductivity Half wavelength of the variations Local Nusselt number Prandtl number Radiation heat flu Conduction heat flu Radiation-conduction parameter or Plank number Temperature of the fluid in the boundary layer Temperature of the ambient fluid Mean temperature at the surface Free stream velocity Dimensionless fluid velocities in the, y directions û,vˆ Dimensional fluid velocities in the ˆ, ŷ directions U, V,y ˆ, ŷ Non-dimensional velocity components Dimensionless aes in the direction along and normal to the surface Dimensional aes in the direction along and normal to the surface X, Y Non-dimensional aes in the direction along and normal to the surface Greek Symbols r T s Relative amplitude of the surface temperature variations Rosseland mean absorption coefficient Volumetric coefficient of thermal epansion Temperature difference Stefan-Boltzmann constant Scattering coefficient
w w η Stream function Wall shear stress Fluid density Dynamic viscosity of the fluid Kinematic viscosity of the fluid Dimensionless temperature function Surface heating parameter Similarity variable 1. INTRODUCTION It is known that power law surface temperature distributions give rise to self similar boundary layer flows [1-]. However, Rees [3] and Roy and Hossain [] proposed another form of surface temperature variation, namely, sinusoidal variations about a mean temperature which is held above the ambient temperature of the fluid. This type of surface temperature may be considered to define the periodic array of heaters behind or within the wall. A large number of literature eists which deals with the effects of surface variations. For eample, the streamwise surface waviness of free and mied convection were investigated by Yao [] and Moulic and Yao [6-7] respectively. Afterwards Cheng and wang [8], Hossain et al. [9] and Kim [1] etended these analysis to micropolar fluids, magnetohydrodynamics and non-newtonian convection, respectively. However, the radiation effect on free convection laminar flow along a vertical flat plate with streamwise sinusoidal surface temperature is still unrevealed which motivates the present study. It is noteworthy that the thermal radiation effect on the free convection flow are important in many engineering applications, such as in advanced types of power plants for nuclear rockets, high-speed flights, re-entry vehicles and processes involving high temperatures. However, a little knowledge is unfolded from a vast effect of radiation on the boundary layer flow of radiating fluid past a body (see Ozisik [11], Ch-13). It is also noted that the radiative heat flues can be approimated by the Rosseland diffusion
approimation [1] for an optically dense medium, which has been greatly used in many radiation related studies [13-]. The interaction of thermal radiation with free convection heat transfer along a vertical flat plate was considered by Cess [13] and Cheng and Ozisic []. The authors considered the absorbing, emitting and non-scattering gas for their investigation. The singular perturbation technique was used to solve the set of non-linear partial differential equations. On the other hand, an analytical attempt was made by Arpaci [1] to understand the non-equilibrium interaction between the thermal radiation and the laminar natural convection from a heated vertical plate immersed in a radiating gas. Shwartz [16] studied the behavior of an emitting and absorbing gas including the entire range of optical thickness, from thin to thick. The effect of radiation using the Rosseland diffusion approimation was analyzed by Hossain et al. [17-18]. The authors obtained the non-similarity solution for the forced and free convection flow of an optically dense viscous incompressible fluid past a heated vertical plate with uniform free stream velocity and surface temperature. They incorporated a group of transformations which led the boundary layer equations to the local non-similarity equations validating both in the forced and free convection regimes. The study of the thermal radiation effect in natural convection in the cylinder also draws many researchers attention. For eample, Novotny and Kelleher [19] investigated the laminar free convection of an absorbing-emitting gas in the region of the stagnation point of a horizontal cylinder. Hossain et al. [-] investigated the radiation effect on free convection along an isothermal vertical cylinder, elliptic cylinder and mied convection from a horizontal circular cylinder. The effect of radiation on natural convection on the wavy surface [3-] is also available in the literature. Very recently sinusoidal temperature variation with time has been studied on the inclined walls of the attic space by Saha et al. [] and on the vertical plate by Roy and Hossain [6]. In the present study, it is proposed to investigate the natural convection flow of an optically thick viscous incompressible fluid along a non-isothermal vertical flat plate considering the Rosseland diffusion approimation. The basic equations of motion are transformed to convenient form, and then solved numerically employing two efficient methods, namely (i) Implicit finite difference method or Keller bo scheme [7] and (ii)
Straight forward finite difference method. Consideration has been given to the situation where the buoyancy forces assist the natural convection flow for various combinations of the radiation-conduction parameter R d, surface heating parameter, w and the Prandtl number, Pr. The numerical results allow us to predict the different behaviour that can be observed when the relevant parameters are varied.. FORMULATION OF PROBLEM A steady two-dimensional laminar free convective flow from non-isothermal semi-infinite vertical flat plate, which is immersed in a viscous and incompressible optically thick fluid, is considered. It is assumed that the heated surface temperature of the plate is maintained at the steady temperature, T T 1 sinˆ l T T w / (1) where T is the ambient temperature, T w is the mean surface temperature with T w > T, is the relative amplitude of the surface temperature variations and l is the wavelength of the variations. The physical configuration and the coordinate system considered here are shown in Fig. 1. Thermal boundary layer Momentum boundary layer g y Fig. 1: Physical model and coordinate system. Under the usual Bousinesq approimation, the equations governing the flow are uˆ vˆ, () ˆ yˆ
uˆ uˆ uˆ (3) uˆ v ˆ g T T, ˆ yˆ yˆ T T k T 1 q û v ˆ r, () ˆ ŷ C p ŷ C p ŷ where û,vˆ are the velocity components along the ˆ, ŷaes, g is the acceleration due to gravity, is the fluid density, k is the thermal conductivity of the fluid, is the coefficient of thermal epansion, is the viscosity of the fluid, C p is the specific heat at constant pressure, and q r on the right hand side of equation () represents the radiative heat flu in the ŷ direction. The appropriate boundary conditions to solve equations ()-() are 1 sinˆ / l at ˆ uˆ v ˆ, T T T y, (a) uˆ, T T as yˆ. (b) This radiation heat flu, q r, is simplified by the Rosseland diffusion approimation as q r 3k T yˆ r s (6) where is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, r is the Rosseland mean absorption coefficient and s is the scattering coefficient. The limitation to the use of the Rosseland diffusion approimation should be recognized. It is valid in the interior of a medium but not near the boundaries. This method is appropriate only for intensive absorption, that is, for an optically thick boundary layer. The approimation cannot provide a complete description of the physical situation near the boundaries since it does not include any terms for radiation from the boundary surface. However, the boundary surface effects are negligible in the interior of an optically thick region since the radiation from the boundaries is attenuated before reaching the interior. To obtain the non-dimensional governing equation let us introduce the following non-dimensional variables, l ˆ 1/ l 1/ 1/ y Gr T T T T w yˆ, l, u Gr uˆ, g T Gr w T l v Gr l 3 v, ˆ, (7)
where (=/) is the reference kinematic viscosity and Gr is the Grashof number, is the non-dimensional temperature function. Substituting the variables (7) into equations ()-() lead to the following nondimensional equations u v, (8) y u u u u v, (9) y y u 1 v 1 Rd 1 w 1 y Pr y, (1) 3 y 3 and the corresponding boundary conditions are at y u v, 1 sin, (11a) u, as y, (11b) where R d is the radiation-conduction parameter or Plank number, w is the ratio of the mean surface temperature and the ambient, called the surface heating parameter and Pr is the Prandtl number, which are defined respectively as R d T k r 3 s T, w T w C p and Pr (1) k 3. Numerical Methods The governing equations (8)-(1) together with the boundary conditions (11a,b) have been solved numerically in this present investigation. Two numerical schemes namely, implicit finite difference method and straight forward finite difference method have been employed to validate the numerical code by comparing the numerical results. Note that in regard to solution procedure the stream-function formulation method used in [] and straight forward finite difference method used here are different. In the stream function formulation the stream function, is solved from the governing equations and the velocity components are calculated from the. However, by using the straight forward
method the velocity components can be solved directly. The brief description of the above two methods are given below. 3.1 Implicit Finite Difference Method Before we employ the implicit finite difference method, we need to reduce the aforementioned equations to a convenient set of equations. To do that, we first, introduce the following transformations over the governing equation:,, 1/ y, 3 / f, where is the non-dimensional stream function defined in the usual way as u y (13) and v. (1) Substituting (13-1) into equations (8)-(11) and after some algebraic manipulations, the transformed equations take the following form f 1 ff 3 1 Rd w Pr 3 along with the boundary conditions f 1 3 f f f f f, () 3 1 1 f f, f,,, 1 sin f, (16), (17a),,, f. (17b) It can be seen that near the leading edge i.e. when, equations () and (16) reduce to the following ordinary differential equations 1 f 3 ff f, (18) 1 3 3 1 Rd 1 w 1 3 f, (19) Pr subject to the boundary conditions, f, 1 f, (a) f, as y. (b)
The physical quantities of principle interest are the shearing stress and the rate of heat transfer in terms of the skin-friction coefficient C f and the Nusselt number Nu respectively, which can be written as C f U w yˆ and Nu k ˆ c r yˆ T T uˆ T where U Gr 1/ u, w and qc k. () yˆ yˆ Using the variables (6), (7), (1) and the boundary condition (17a) into equations (1)-(), we get C f Gr 1/ / w q q (1) f,, (3) 1/ 3 NuGr 1 Rd w,. () 3 Now we employ one of the implicit finite difference method (the Keller bo method) in solving the nonlinear system of partial differential equations ()-(16) that govern the flow. To employ this method, the set of equations ()-(16) is written in terms of a system of first order equations in y, which are then epressed in finite difference form by approimating the functions and the diffusion terms by the central difference and the convective terms by the backward difference. Denoting the mesh points in the (, ) plane by i and j, where i = 1,, 3,, M and j = 1,, 3,, N, central difference approimations are made such that the equations involving eplicitly are centred at ( i1/, j1/ ) and the remainder at ( i, j1/ ), where j1/ = ( j + j1 )/, etc. This results in a set of nonlinear difference equations for the unknowns at i in terms of their values at i1. These equations are then linearised by the Newton s quasi-linearization technique and are solved using a block-tridiagonal algorithm, taking as the initial iteration of the converged solution at = i1. Now to initiate the process at =, we first provide guess profiles for all five variables (arising the reduction to the first order form) and use the Keller bo method to solve the governing ordinary differential equations. Having obtained the lower stagnation point solution it is possible to march step by step along the boundary layer. For a given value of, the iterative procedure is stopped when the difference in computing the velocity and the temperature in the net iteration is less than
1, i.e. when f i 1, where the superscript denotes the iteration number. The computations are performed using a non-uniform grid in the y direction which is by j = sinh (( j-1)/p), with j = 1,,, 31 and p = 1. 3. Straight Forward Finite Difference Method In order to incorporate the SFFD we introduce the following new transformations as y u X, Y, U, V 1/ v, (X,Y) (, y) () 1 / 1/ Using () into (8-1), we get XU X U X X 1 1 U V U Y Y Y, (6) U 1 U 1 U XU V - UY U, (7) X Y Y 1 1 V - UY 1 Rd 1 w 1 (8) Y Pr Y 3 Y 3 The corresponding boundary conditions are U V X at Y, 1 sin (9a) U, as Y (9b) Now equations (6)-(8) subject to the boundary conditions (9) are discretized for straight forward finite difference (SFFD) method using central-difference for diffusion terms and the forward-difference for the convection terms ([]). Finally we get a system of tri-diagonal algebraic equations which are solved by Gaussian elimination technique. The computation is started at X =. and then marches downstream implicitly. Here we have taken X =. and Y =.1 for the X-and Y- grids respectively. The physical quantities, namely the rate of heat-transfer and the average rate of heat transfer which have great importance from the application point of view are defined as dimensionless form as follows, 1/ U C f Gr / (3) Y Y
NuGr 1/ 3 1 Rd w (31) 3 Y Y. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The numerical results of the natural convection adjacent to a semi-infinite vertical flat plate with sinusoidal streamwise surface heating have been presented in this study. The main objective of this study is to show the effect of radiative heat flu represented by Rosseland approimation on the flow field and the heat transfer of the boundary layer adjacent to the vertical flat plate. It is also shown the effect of the amplitude of the non uniform surface temperature on the flow field and the heat transfer. The results are discussed in terms of the skin-friction coefficient and the rate of heat transfer for different values of the physical parameters controlling the flow, for eample, conduction-radiation parameter, ( R d 1), surface temperature parameter, (1.1 θ w 1.9) and the amplitude of the surface temperature, (. 1). Velocity and temperature profiles as well as streamlines and isotherms are also presented for the variation of conduction-radiation parameter. 1.6 (a) 1. f (,). Present Rees [3] 1
(b) '(,) Present Rees [3] 1-1 - 1 Fig. : Comparison with Rees [3], (a) f (,) and (b) (,) for R d =. while Pr =.7, = 1.. Since there is no eperimental data available in the literature, the obtained results have been compared with two methods. Moreover, without radiation effect (R d =.) the solution can be compared with Rees [3] which is shown in Fig. (a-b). It is found that there is a good agreement between two results. 1. (a) 1. C f Gr 1/ 1. R d... 1. IFD SFFD. (b) 1. 1.. NuGr -1/ R d... 1. IFD SFFD.... 6. 8. 1. -.... 6. 8. 1. Fig. 3: (a) Skin-friction coefficient and (b) Nusselt number for different values of R d while Pr =.7, =. and w = 1.1. Numerical values of the skin friction, C f Gr 1/, and the rate of heat transfer, NuGr -3/, are shown graphically, respectively, in Figs 3(a-b) against for the radiationconduction parameter, R d =.,.,., and 1. while keeping Pr =.7, =., and
θ w = 1.1 fied. Solutions are obtained using two different methods, implicit finite difference method (IFD) and the straight forward finite difference method (SFFD). Solid lines represent the results obtained by IFD and the dashed dot lines represent the results obtained by SFFD. It is anticipated that both lines merged together which conforms the efficiency of the numerical schemes. It is revealed from Fig. 3(a) and (b) that both skinfriction and rate of heat transfer are enhanced considerably, owing to increase in the values of conduction radiation parameter, R d. This is happened because when the conduction radiation parameter increases, there is an increase in the rate of energy transport of the fluid within the boundary layer. Finally it upraises the temperature of the fluid layers in the vicinity of the plate surface. The waviness of the curves shows the effect of the streamwise temperature condition on the surface.. (a) 1. C f Gr 1/... 1. (b) NuGr -1/ 8. 6...... 1. 1.. -..... 6. 8. 1. -.... 6. 8. 1. Fig. : (a) Skin-friction coefficient and (b) Nusselt number for different values of while Pr =.7, R d = 1. and w = 1.1 Fig. shows the variation of skin friction coefficient and rate of heat transfer against different values of the temperature wave amplitude on the plate for R d = 1. and w = 1.1. It is clear from the figures that both skin friction coefficient and the Nusselt number are uniform all over the plate if the amplitude is zero. However, with the increase of the amplitude of the heating effect both parameters also increase. The overall behaviour of these two figures may be discussed by observing the thermal and viscous boundary layers. As we know that when the temperature on the surface is relatively high, the fluids inside the boundary layer accelerate. On the other hand, if the surface temperature is low the fluids in the boundary layer have the minimum velocity. Therefore, it is epected that the shear stress and the rate of heat transfer will be higher at
the position where the temperature is maimum. At the same time the ambient fluids receive the heat from the radiation and become heated. If the ambient temperature eceeds the mean temperature of the surface then the temperature difference will be maimum at the position where the surface temperature is minimum. As a result the overall heat transfer will be from the fluid into the surface which can be clearly seen in Fig. (b) where the Nusselt number is shown as negative.. (a) C f Gr 1/ 1.6 1. 1.1 1.3 1. 1.7 1.9... 6. 8. 1. 1. (b) 8. NuGr -1/ 6.... -. -. 1.1 1.3 1. 1.7 1.9-6.... 6. 8. 1. Fig. : (a) Skin-friction coefficient and (b) Nusselt number for different values of w while Pr =.7, =. and R d = 1. The coefficient of skin-friction and Nusselt number for different values of the ratio of the mean surface temperature and the ambient, w while Pr =.7, =. and R d = 1. are fied have been shown in figure. It is observed that both skin friction and the rate of heat transfer increases with the increasing values of w. It is also observed that the heat transfer rate is higher when the surface temperature is lower which can be clearly seen in figure (b). Velocity and temperature profiles have been presented in figure 6 for different values of conduction radiation parameter, R d for the fied values of Pr -.7, =. and w = 1.1 at = 1.. Both viscous and thermal boundary layers increase with the increase of conduction radiation parameter, R d. It is also observed that the maimum velocity also increases with increase of R d. The maimum velocity for all values of R d is at about = 1.8. Therefore, it can be concluded that the inner viscous layer does not increase for variation of radiation parameter. Only the outer layer thickness has a great influence of R d.
(a).6 f /. R d... 1. 1. (b).6. R d... 1....... 6. 8. 1..... 6. 8. 1. Fig. 6: (a) Velocity and (b) Temperature profiles for different values of R d while Pr =.7, =. and w = 1.1 at = 1. Figure 7 and 8 shows the streamlines and temperature contours for different conduction radiation parameter, R d while =., Pr =.7 and w = 1.1. It is seen in figure 7 that as the radiation parameter increases the velocity inside the boundary layer increases as it is seen in the velocity profiles in figure 6. The streamlines concentrate near the wall for the higher values of radiation parameter. On the other hand the thermal boundary layer becomes thicker as R d increases. The flow of the fluid appears to be oscillating near the surface of the plate due to streamwise variations of the surface temperature. (a) 1. 1.. 7. 9. 11. 13.. (b) 1..7. 3.6 7.6 11.6 9. 19. 18..6 1. (c) 1y 1 1 y y Fig. 7: Streamlines for (a) R d =. (b) R d =. (c) R d = 1. while Pr =.7, =. and w = 1.1 1.. 9.. 1... 18..9
(a) (b) (c) 1.9.6.3..1 1.9.9.7..3..1 1.9.9..3..1 y 1 y 1 y 1 Fig. 8: Isotherms for (a) R d =. (b) R d =. (c) R d = 1. while Pr =.7, =. and w = 1.1 Figs. 9 and 1 show the streamlines and isotherms for the effects of the surface heating parameter w, respectively while Pr =.7, =. and R d = 1.. It is seen that within the boundary layer flow flu increases owing to the increase of surface heating parameter which is epected, since more surface heating intensify the flow velocity. From the isotherm it is very much clear for higher surface heating the thickness of the thermal boundary layer increases. (a) 1. 3. (b) 6.3 (c) 9.1.1.9 17. 19..1 1 13. 1. 1 16.6 1. 6. 1. 1..8. 1 1 1 y y y Fig. 9: Streamlines for (a) w = 1.1 (b) w = 1. and (c) w = 1.8 while Pr =.7, =. and R d = 1. 11.1 8.3 1. 6.9 1. 9.7
(a) 1 1.1.9 (b) 1 (c) 1..3..1 1 y.7...1 y 1 1.7.61.39.16. 1 y Fig. 1: Isotherms for (a) w = 1.1 (b) w = 1. and (c) w = 1.8 while Pr =.7, =. and R d = 1. Conclusions Here we have investigated the effect of thermal radiation on a steady two-dimensional natural convection laminar flow of viscous incompressible optically thick fluid along a vertical flat plate with streamwise surface temperature. There are two efficient methodologies, namely, Implicit finite difference method and Straight forward finite difference method have been used. Effects of various physical parameters arise from the governing equations and the boundary conditions on fluid flow and heat transfer has been shown. Velocity and temperature profiles as well as streamlines and isotherms are also presented. The outcomes of the results can be summarised as bellow: Both skin-friction and rate of heat transfer are enhanced considerably, owing to increase in the values of conduction radiation parameter, R d. If the amplitude of the heating parameter is zero then both skin friction coefficient and the Nusselt number are uniform all over the plate. However, with the increase of the amplitude of the heating effect both parameters also increase.
With the increasing values of w, both skin friction and the rate of heat transfer increases. Viscous and thermal boundary layers increase with the increase of conduction radiation parameter, R d. It is also seen that the maimum velocity also increases with increase of R d. The streamlines concentrate near the wall for the higher values of radiation parameter. However, the thermal boundary layer becomes thicker as R d increases. The flow of the fluid appears to be oscillating near the surface of the plate due to streamwise variations of the surface temperature. REFERENCES 1. S. Ostrach, An analysis of laminar free convection flow and heat transfer about a flat plate parallel to the direction of the generating body force, NACA TN 63, 19. E. M. Sparrow, J. L. Gregg, Similar solution for free convection from a nonisothermal vertical plate, Trans. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, 8 (198) 379-38. 3. D. A. S. Rees, The effect of steady streamwise surface temperature variations on vertical free convection; Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 31 (1999) 13-133.. N. C. Roy, M. A. Hossain, Numerical solution of a steady natural convection flow from a vertical plate with the combined effects of streamwise temperature and species concentration variations, Heat and Mass Transfer 6 (1) 9-. L. S. Yao, Natural convection along a vertical wavy surface, Trans. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer (1983) 6-68 6. S. G. Moulic, L. S. Yao, Mied convection along a wavy surface, Trans. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 111 (1989) 97-979 7. S. G. Moulic, L. S. Yao, Natural convection along a vertical wavy surface with uniform heat flu, Trans. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer 111 (1989) 116-118. 8. Cheng C. W. and Wang C. C., Forced convection in micropolar fluid over a wavy surface, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A, 37 () 71-87.
9. M. A. Hossain, K. C. A. Alam, I. Pop, Magnetohydodynamic free convection along a vertical wavy surface, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1 (1996) -66, 1. E. Kim, Natural convection along a wavy vertical plate to non-newtonian fluids, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer (1997) 369-378. 11. M. N. Ozisik, Radiative Transfer and Interactions with Conduction and Convection, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1973. 1. S. Rosseland, Theoretical Astrophysics, Oford University Press, London 1936 13. R. D. Cess, The interaction of thermal radiation with free convection heat transfer, Int J, Heat Mass Transfer, 9 (1966) 169-177. 1. V. S Arpaci., Effect of thermal radiation on the laminar free convection from a heated vertical plate, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 11 (1968) 871-881.. E. H. Cheng, M. N. Ozisic, Radiation with free convection in an absorbing, emitting and scattering medium, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, (197) 13-. 16. J. Shwartz, Radiation coupled viscous flows, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 11 (1968) 689-697. 17. M. A. Hossain, H. S. Takhar, Radiation effect on mied convection along a vertical plate with uniform surface temperature, Heat and Mass transfer, 31 (1996) 3-8. 18. M. A. Hossain, D. A. S. Rees, I. Pop, Free convection radiation interaction from an isothermal plate inclined at a small angle to the horizontal, Acta Mechanica, 17 (1998) 63-73. 19. J. L. Novotny, M. D. Kelleher, Free convection stagnation flow of an absorbingemitting gas, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1 (1967) 1171-1178.. M. A. Hossain, M. A. Alim, D. A. S. Rees, Effect of thermal radiation on natural convection over cylinders of elliptic cross section, Acta Mechanica, 19 (1998) 177-186. 1. M. A. Hossain, M. A. Alim, Natural convection-radiation interaction on boundary layer flow along a thin vertical cylinder, Heat Mass Transfer, 3 (1997) -.
. M. A. Hossain, M. Kutubuddin, I. Pop, Radiation-conduction interaction on mied convection from a horizontal circular cylinder, Heat Mass Transfer 3 (1999) 37-31. 3. M. M. Molla, M. A. Hossain, R. S. R. Gorla, The effect of radiation on natural convection flow over a vertical frustum of wavy cone. Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science. 3 (8) 16-161.. M. M. Molla, M. A. Hossain, Radiation effect on mied convection flow along a vertical wavy surface. Int. J. Thermal Science, 6 (7) 96-93.. S. C. Saha, J. C. Patterson, C. Lei, Natural convection and heat transfer in attics subject to periodic thermal forcing. Int. J. Thermal Science, 9 (1) 1899-191. 6. N. C. Roy and M. A. Hossain, The effect of conduction radiation on the oscillating natural convection boundary layer flow of viscous incompressible fluid along a vertical plate. Proc. IMechE Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, (1) 199-197. 7. H. B. Keller, Numerical methods in boundary layer theory, Annual Rev. Fluid Mech., 1 (1978) 17-33.