CLUMPY: A public code for γ-ray and ν signals from dark matter structures.

Similar documents
Dark matter annihilation and decay factors in the Milky Way s dwarf spheroidal galaxies

CTA as a γ-ray probe for dark matter structures: Searching for the smallest clumps & the largest clusters

Signal Model vs. Observed γ-ray Sky

Princeton December 2009 The fine-scale structure of dark matter halos

Impact of substructures on predictions of dark matter annihilation signals

Emmanuel Moulin! on behalf of the CTA Consortium!!! Rencontres de Moriond 2013! Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe! March 9-16, La Thuile,

Constraints on dark matter annihilation cross section with the Fornax cluster

4. Structure of Dark Matter halos. Hence the halo mass, virial radius, and virial velocity are related by

4. Structure of Dark Matter halos. Hence the halo mass, virial radius, and virial velocity are related by

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

Constraining Galactic dark matter in the Fermi-LAT sky with photon counts statistics

Cross-Correlation of Cosmic Shear and Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background

Latest Results on Dark Matter and New Physics Searches with Fermi. Simona Murgia, SLAC-KIPAC on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

Enhancement of Antimatter Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

Constraining Dark Matter annihilation with the Fermi-LAT isotropic gamma-ray background

Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Center with Fermi LAT: Challenges

The VERITAS Dark M atter and Astroparticle Programs. Benjamin Zitzer For The VERITAS Collaboration

Gamma-ray background anisotropy from Galactic dark matter substructure

Anisotropy signatures of dark matter annihilation

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

A New View of the High-Energy γ-ray Sky with the Fermi Telescope

The Los Cabos Lectures

The Galactic diffuse gamma ray emission in the energy range 30 TeV 3 PeV

Testing a DM explanation of the positron excess with the Inverse Compton scattering

A search for dark matter annihilation in the newly discovered dwarf galaxy Reticulum II

Using the Fermi-LAT to Search for Indirect Signals from Dark Matter Annihilation

EGRET Excess of diffuse Galactic Gamma Rays as a Trace of the Dark Matter Halo

Astrophysical issues in indirect DM detection

Probing Dark Matter with Cosmic Messengers

DM subhalos: The obser vational challenge

The Los Cabos Lectures

Robust estimate of the dark matter halo of the Milky-way's dwarf spheroidal galaxies

Phenomenological studies in dark matter direct detection: from the impact of the escape speed estimates to tests of halo models

Dark Matter Electron Anisotropy: A universal upper limit

Future DM indirect detection in dwarf spheroidal galaxies and Foreground effect on the J-factor estimation Koji Ichikawa

Indirect Dark Matter Searches in the Milky Way Center with the LAT on board Fermi

Structure and substructure in dark matter halos

Mattia Di Mauro. Fermi-LAT point source population studies and origin of the Fermi-LAT gamma-ray background. Trieste, May, 3, 2016

Miguel A. Sánchez Conde (Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias)

Dark Matter Detection Using Pulsar Timing

the CTA Consortium represented by Aldo Morselli

Isotropic diffuse and extragalactic γ-ray background: emission from extragalactic sources vs dark matter annihilating particles

Probing Dark Matter in Galaxy Clusters using Neutrinos

Indirect dark matter searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array

Indirect dark matter detection and the Galactic Center GeV Excess

Structure of Dark Matter Halos

Fundamental Physics with GeV Gamma Rays

Indirect Detection of Dark Matter with Gamma Rays

Hunting for Dark Matter in Anisotropies of Gamma-ray Sky: Theory and First Observational Results from Fermi-LAT

Koji Ichikawa. (In preparation) TAUP, Torino, Sep. 7-11, 2015

Koji Ichikawa In collaboration with Kohei Hayashi, Masahiro Ibe, Miho N. Ishigaki, Shigeki Matsumoto and Hajime Sugai.

Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies. Present status and future prospects

Neutrino Astronomy fast-forward

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Masses of Dwarf Satellites of the Milky Way

Prospects for indirect dark matter detection with Fermi and IACTs

Sommerfeld-Enhanced J-Factors for Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies

Indirect Dark Matter Searches: a Review Eric Charles SLAC National Lab.

Instituto de Fisica Teórica, IFT-CSIC Madrid. Marco Taoso. DM and the Galactic Center GeV excess

Gamma-ray and neutrino diffuse emissions of the Galaxy above the TeV

Astrophysical issues in the cosmic ray e spectra: Have we seen dark matter annihilation?

The fine-scale structure of dark matter halos

Update on the Two Smoking Gun" Fermi LAT Searches for Dark Matter- Milky Way Dwarfs and Lines

Indirect Dark Matter Detection with Dwarf Galaxies

THE MAGIC TELESCOPES. Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov Telescopes

Sep. 13, JPS meeting

Resolving the Extragalactic γ-ray Background

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

The cosmic distance scale

Signals from Dark Matter Indirect Detection

Recent Searches for Dark Matter with the Fermi-LAT

Non-detection of the 3.55 kev line from M31/ Galactic center/limiting Window with Chandra

The Egret Excess, an Example of Combining Tools

DeepCore and Galactic Center Dark Matter

Indirect searches for dark matter with the Fermi LAT instrument

Estimating the mass of our Milky Way from the LAMOST Galactic spectroscopic survey

The Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Clusters


Structure formation in the concordance cosmology

The tidal stirring model and its application to the Sagittarius dwarf

Particle Acceleration in the Universe

Koji Ichikawa. Prospects on the indirect dark matter detection and a future spectroscopic survey of dwarf spheroidal galaxies.

Fermi measurements of diffuse gamma-ray emission: results at the first-year milestone

A New Method for Characterizing Unresolved Point Sources: applications to Fermi Gamma-Ray Data

Searching for dark matter. with gamma-ray anisotropies

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA)

Search for Dark Matter from the Galactic Halo with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory Paper Review

DM direct detection predictions from hydrodynamic simulations

Astroparticle Anomalies

Understanding High Energy Neutrinos

Gamma rays from Galactic pulsars: high- and lowlatitude

Hunting for dark matter in the forest (astrophysical constraints on warm dark matter)

Astro2020 Science White Paper Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars

The Galactic Center Excess. Kevork N. Abazajian

Wino dark matter breaks the siege

Ruling out thermal dark matter with a black hole induced spiky profile in the M87 galaxy

IAU Symposium #254, Copenhagen June 2008 Simulations of disk galaxy formation in their cosmological context

Recent Results on Dark Matter Searches with Fermi. Simona Murgia, SLAC-KIPAC on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

Transcription:

CLUMPY: A public code for γ-ray and ν signals from dark matter structures. Moritz Hütten, DESY Zeuthen for the CLUMPY developers: Vincent Bonnivard, Moritz Hütten, Emmanuel Nezri, Aldée Charbonnier, Céline Combet, David Maurin TOOLS 2017, Mon-Repos (Corfu) https://lpsc.in2p3.fr/clumpy/ Bonnivard et al. (CPC, 2016), arxiv:1506.07628 Charbonnier et al. (CPC, 2012), arxiv:1201.4728

Introduction - the physics case 2

Indirect DM detection in γ-rays and ν Dense & massive astrophysical DM budget Annihilation or decay of the DM NASA/G. Dinderman Detectors for astrophysical γ-rays and neutrinos Fermi-LAT CTA (m > GeV) IceCube 3

Indirect DM detection in γ-rays and neutrinos Prompt γ-ray/ν flux in case of DM annihilation (local Universe): Flux = Particle physics J : Astrophysical factor 1505.07259 Detection or non-detection: J-factor and uncertainty must be wellknown to put constraints on DM candidate Annihilation: Signal depends crucially on DM target and distribution (smooth + substructures) (CLUMPY can also do all calculations for DM decay, but skipped for this talk) 4

Indirect DM detection in γ-rays and neutrinos Where to look? Massive & dense (M 2/V) vs. close (1/d 2) vs. little astrophysical background + single galaxy clusters (d > Mpc) Satellite galaxies Galactic center p 8k c c cti a l Ga ane pl 300 kpc + ensemble average of extragalactic DM (d > Gpc) Dark subhalos Angulo et al. (2008) n re ext lea se ΔΩ Aquarius simulation Springel et al. (Nature, 2008) CLUMPY calculates J-factors/fluxes for all the various targets 5

Indirect DM detection in extragalactic γ-rays Consider for γ-rays from outside the local Universe Redshifting of the γ-rays/ neutrino energy loss γ-rays absorption by pair-production with photons of the extragalactic background light (EBL) F. Aharonian (2004) Coma cluster Mean free γ-ray path IR/ VIS M31 Radio Milky Way disk CMB LEXI, University of Hamburg 6

Indirect DM detection in extragalactic γ-rays More intricate form of flux equation (single extragalactic object): EBL absorption redshift annihilation boost in smaller proper volume description in comoving coordinates Separation in particle physics/astrophysics term breaks down if considering a signal originating from multiple redshift shells (see Marco Cirelli s talk for the full complex equation) 7

J tot integration, substructures, and boost factor Simple or smooth DM density profile: No analytic J-factor expression for usual NFW, Einasto,.. DM density profiles Milky Way sitting inside cluster sitting outside numeric line-of-sight integration needed log(dj/dω) J sub (θ): shallower J sm (θ): steeper DM substructure: For DM annihilation, we have a boost from unresolved substructures in the halo, J = J sm + <J sub > = boost J sm Angle θ from center (dsph, MW, cluster) depending on dp/dv, J sub (θ) not proportional to J sm (θ)! dsph: boost(θ) ~ 1 2 Galaxy cluster: boost(θ) ~ 10 100 8

J tot integration, substructures, and boost factor Boost factor is main uncertainty - depends on particle physics and small scale physics dsph: boost(θ) ~ 1 2 Galaxy cluster: boost(θ) ~ 10 100? T. Bringmann, 0903.0189 Springel et al. (2008) Mass converges for M min 0, but not annihilation boost! 9

The Code 10

What is CLUMPY? https://lpsc.in2p3.fr/clumpy/ Open-source, written in C/C++ Depends on: CERN s ROOT Heasarc s cfitsio HEALPix (next release shipped with frozen HEALPix version) gsl GreAT (lpsc.in2p3.fr/great, optional) Bonnivard et al. (CPC, 2016), arxiv:1506.07628 Charbonnier et al. (CPC, 2012), arxiv:1201.4728 Runs on Linux and MacOS X Open source code to provide the community with reproducible and comparable models for J-factors and prompt γ-ray/ν fluxes 11

CLUMPY features (I): ρ sm + ρ subs J-factor/flux J-factors/fluxes of individual objects (e.g. dsph s) from pre-defined DM profiles Propagate error bars from DM profiles to J-factors and limits on DM (Bonnivard ApJ, MNRAS, 2015) Take into account substructures: resolved (statistical) + unresolved: boost vary distribution within host halo (antibiased, own profile, ) Clumps within clumps: multiple levels of selfsimilar sub-subclustering (converges for ~2 levels) Comparison of classical dsph, brightest galaxy clusters, and galactic DM foreground (Charbonnier et al., MNRAS, 2011; Nezri et al., MNRAS, 2012) allow triaxial distortion of halo profile (semiaxis ratio a, b, c) Despali et al. (2013) N-body simulations/kinematic analyses find triaxial halo shapes 12 LMC dj/dω profile with resolved substructure model (analysis done by M. Castaño, São Paulo)

Some results: Boost uncertainty (Bonnivard et al., 1506.07628) Boost from different models dsph: boost(θ) ~ 1 2 Galaxy cluster: boost(θ) ~ 10 100? Also consider self-similar subsubclustering 13

CLUMPY features (I): ρ sm + ρ subs J-factor/flux J-factors/fluxes of individual objects (e.g. dsph s) from pre-defined DM profiles Directly compute differential/integral fluxes (1D and 2D), relying on PPPC4DMID (Cirelli et al., 2010) ROOT pop-up graphics (1D and 2D) Choose output format: ROOT, HEALPix FITS (2D), ASCII FITS images interfaceable with gammalib/ Correct cosmology (line-of-sight and angular diameter distance) + EBL flux absorption for extragalactic objects next release HEALPix pixelization (FITS format) next release ROOT plots and output format projected FITS image 14

CLUMPY features (II): Full-sky MW analysis with subhalos Skymaps of full or partial J-factor sky from DM in the Milky Way halo Fast realistic synthetic skymaps at any instrumental resolution check that we recover N-body simulation end-products from a handful of parameters extend N-body simulation results by varying key parameters to study impact on halo/substructure brightness Resolved substructure Smartly pre-select brightest subhalos for speed (e.g., reduce 10 15 total subhalos in the MW to ~10 4 at a precision of 2% and θ int =0.2 ). allows to do statistical assessment of MW substructure properties (average mass, distance, luminosity, ) Application in the context of CTA and sensitivity to dark halo searches in Hütten et al., JCAP (2016) CLUMPY Spherical MW halo E = 4 GeV m=200gev bb Triaxial MW halo E = 4 GeV m=200gev bb Aquarius simulation speed < 1h Resolved substructure 15

CLUMPY features (III): Jeans analysis module From stellar kinematics to DM profile Observed = projected Light profile & velocity dispersion Data de-projection projection stellar density & radial velocity dispersion Spherical Jeans equation: solve for Gravitation : anisotropy enclosed mass log(ρ) Dark matter profile γ = 1 (NFW) DM model γ = 0 α β Fit χ 2 or MCMC analysis to extract DM parameters r s log(r) 16

CLUMPY features (III): Jeans analysis module Dsph galaxy analysis: ranking and/or credible intervals Bonnivard et al. (2015, ApJL 808, 36 + MNRAS 453, 849) CLUMPY modules I + III together Many new MW satellite galaxies just discovered (DES) & expected (e.g., LSST): CLUMPY can be used as soon as spectroscopic data is available 17

Towards the next (3 rd ) release: Extragalactic module IV: Compute γ-ray and ν fluxes from various extragalactic sources (total isotropic flux + variation) Improved output tailored to use CLUMPY with CTA tools (gammalib/ctools) Improved user input options (parameter file or command line options) Code compilation optimization for easier installation and platformcompatibility. Moved to git To be released within the next ~6 months (Hütten et al., in prep.) Stay tuned! 18

Summary CLUMPY: multi-purpose code for indirect DM detection modeling and analysis Code distribution and usage: Open-source: reproducible and comparable J-factor calculations User-friendly, fully documented using Doxygen, lots of examples & tests to run All runs from single parameter file or command line (profiles, concentration, spectra...) Fast computation of: Annihilation or decay astrophysical factors using any DM profile Boost from substructures and its uncertainty Integrated/differential fluxes in γ-rays and neutrinos, mixing user-defined branching ratios Four main modules / physics cases: I. DM emission from list of objects (dsph galaxies, galaxy clusters) II. Full-sky map mode for Galactic DM emission with substructure + additional objects from list III. Jeans module: full analysis from kinematic data to J-factors for dsph IV. Full-sky map mode for extragalactic DM emission (coming with the 3 rd release) Growing use in the community for state-of-the-art DM studies for many targets (dsphs, cluster, dark clumps ) and by several collaborations (ANTARES, HAWC, CTA) Download https://lpsc.in2p3.fr/clumpy/ + stay tuned for 3 rd release! 19

Thanks for your attention 20

All parameters controlled from parameter file 21

All parameters controlled from parameter file 22

J tot integration, substructures, and boost factor Milky Way up to 20% of J tot in some config. exact realisation (mass and position) of DM distribution unknown Average description using mass and spatial distribution from simulations 23