How to prove the Riemann Hypothesis

Similar documents
How to Prove the Riemann Hypothesis Author: Fayez Fok Al Adeh.

e t dt e t dt = lim e t dt T (1 e T ) = 1

Mathematics 805 Final Examination Answers

2k 1. . And when n is odd number, ) The conclusion is when n is even number, an. ( 1) ( 2 1) ( k 0,1,2 L )

INTEGRALS. Exercise 1. Let f : [a, b] R be bounded, and let P and Q be partitions of [a, b]. Prove that if P Q then U(P ) U(Q) and L(P ) L(Q).

Contraction Mapping Principle Approach to Differential Equations

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 3. Chapter 1

ENGR 1990 Engineering Mathematics The Integral of a Function as a Function

MTH 146 Class 11 Notes

0 for t < 0 1 for t > 0

1. Introduction. 1 b b

Refinements to Hadamard s Inequality for Log-Convex Functions

4.8 Improper Integrals

GENERALIZATION OF SOME INEQUALITIES VIA RIEMANN-LIOUVILLE FRACTIONAL CALCULUS

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( y )

A Simple Method to Solve Quartic Equations. Key words: Polynomials, Quartics, Equations of the Fourth Degree INTRODUCTION

New Inequalities in Fractional Integrals

Physics 2A HW #3 Solutions

Green s Functions and Comparison Theorems for Differential Equations on Measure Chains

f t f a f x dx By Lin McMullin f x dx= f b f a. 2

3. Renewal Limit Theorems

Chapter 2. Motion along a straight line. 9/9/2015 Physics 218

Positive and negative solutions of a boundary value problem for a

A LIMIT-POINT CRITERION FOR A SECOND-ORDER LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR IAN KNOWLES

A 1.3 m 2.5 m 2.8 m. x = m m = 8400 m. y = 4900 m 3200 m = 1700 m

On The Hermite- Hadamard-Fejér Type Integral Inequality for Convex Function

f(x) dx with An integral having either an infinite limit of integration or an unbounded integrand is called improper. Here are two examples dx x x 2

MAT 266 Calculus for Engineers II Notes on Chapter 6 Professor: John Quigg Semester: spring 2017

An integral having either an infinite limit of integration or an unbounded integrand is called improper. Here are two examples.

Motion. Part 2: Constant Acceleration. Acceleration. October Lab Physics. Ms. Levine 1. Acceleration. Acceleration. Units for Acceleration.

EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS FOR A SECOND-ORDER ITERATIVE BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM

September 20 Homework Solutions

Solutions to Problems from Chapter 2

Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex functions via fractional integrals

Analytic solution of linear fractional differential equation with Jumarie derivative in term of Mittag-Leffler function

Integral Transform. Definitions. Function Space. Linear Mapping. Integral Transform

Chapter Direct Method of Interpolation

Question Details Int Vocab 1 [ ] Question Details Int Vocab 2 [ ]

The solution is often represented as a vector: 2xI + 4X2 + 2X3 + 4X4 + 2X5 = 4 2xI + 4X2 + 3X3 + 3X4 + 3X5 = 4. 3xI + 6X2 + 6X3 + 3X4 + 6X5 = 6.

5.1-The Initial-Value Problems For Ordinary Differential Equations

Challenge Problems. DIS 203 and 210. March 6, (e 2) k. k(k + 2). k=1. f(x) = k(k + 2) = 1 x k

LECTURE 10: JACOBI SYMBOL

Solutions of half-linear differential equations in the classes Gamma and Pi

LAPLACE TRANSFORMS. 1. Basic transforms

Convergence of Singular Integral Operators in Weighted Lebesgue Spaces

SMT 2014 Calculus Test Solutions February 15, 2014 = 3 5 = 15.

1.0 Electrical Systems

Some Inequalities variations on a common theme Lecture I, UL 2007

ON THE OSTROWSKI-GRÜSS TYPE INEQUALITY FOR TWICE DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONS

14. The fundamental theorem of the calculus

FM Applications of Integration 1.Centroid of Area

Suyash Narayan Mishra, Piyush Kumar Tripathi & Alok Agrawal

HUI-HSIUNG KUO, ANUWAT SAE-TANG, AND BENEDYKT SZOZDA

P441 Analytical Mechanics - I. Coupled Oscillators. c Alex R. Dzierba

Properties of Logarithms. Solving Exponential and Logarithmic Equations. Properties of Logarithms. Properties of Logarithms. ( x)

MATH 31B: MIDTERM 2 REVIEW. x 2 e x2 2x dx = 1. ue u du 2. x 2 e x2 e x2] + C 2. dx = x ln(x) 2 2. ln x dx = x ln x x + C. 2, or dx = 2u du.

ON NEW INEQUALITIES OF SIMPSON S TYPE FOR FUNCTIONS WHOSE SECOND DERIVATIVES ABSOLUTE VALUES ARE CONVEX

LAPLACE TRANSFORM OVERCOMING PRINCIPLE DRAWBACKS IN APPLICATION OF THE VARIATIONAL ITERATION METHOD TO FRACTIONAL HEAT EQUATIONS

Section P.1 Notes Page 1 Section P.1 Precalculus and Trigonometry Review

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

Hermite-Hadamard and Simpson Type Inequalities for Differentiable Quasi-Geometrically Convex Functions

CHAPTER 11 PARAMETRIC EQUATIONS AND POLAR COORDINATES

FURTHER GENERALIZATIONS. QI Feng. The value of the integral of f(x) over [a; b] can be estimated in a variety ofways. b a. 2(M m)

Polynomial Approximations for the Natural Logarithm and Arctangent Functions. Math 230

Math 2142 Exam 1 Review Problems. x 2 + f (0) 3! for the 3rd Taylor polynomial at x = 0. To calculate the various quantities:

EXERCISE - 01 CHECK YOUR GRASP

A Time Truncated Improved Group Sampling Plans for Rayleigh and Log - Logistic Distributions

graph of unit step function t

THREE IMPORTANT CONCEPTS IN TIME SERIES ANALYSIS: STATIONARITY, CROSSING RATES, AND THE WOLD REPRESENTATION THEOREM

S Radio transmission and network access Exercise 1-2

Average & instantaneous velocity and acceleration Motion with constant acceleration

1 jordan.mcd Eigenvalue-eigenvector approach to solving first order ODEs. -- Jordan normal (canonical) form. Instructor: Nam Sun Wang

PHYSICS 1210 Exam 1 University of Wyoming 14 February points

MATH 124 AND 125 FINAL EXAM REVIEW PACKET (Revised spring 2008)

A note on diagonalization of integral quadratic forms modulo p m

() t. () t r () t or v. ( t) () () ( ) = ( ) or ( ) () () () t or dv () () Section 10.4 Motion in Space: Velocity and Acceleration

3 Motion with constant acceleration: Linear and projectile motion

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 2

ON BILATERAL GENERATING FUNCTIONS INVOLVING MODIFIED JACOBI POLYNOMIALS

Duality # Second iteration for HW problem. Recall our LP example problem we have been working on, in equality form, is given below.

Suggested Solution for Pure Mathematics 2011 By Y.K. Ng (last update: 8/4/2011) Paper I. (b) (c)

5.4. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. 356 Chapter 5: Integration. Mean Value Theorem for Definite Integrals

USA Mathematical Talent Search Round 1 Solutions Year 25 Academic Year

CS335 Fall D Drawings: Circles and Curves

a 2 +x 2 x a 2 -x 2 Figure 1: Triangles for Trigonometric Substitution

Properties of Integrals, Indefinite Integrals. Goals: Definition of the Definite Integral Integral Calculations using Antiderivatives

On Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for Caputo k-fractional derivatives

MAA 4212 Improper Integrals

IX.1.1 The Laplace Transform Definition 700. IX.1.2 Properties 701. IX.1.3 Examples 702. IX.1.4 Solution of IVP for ODEs 704

Application on Inner Product Space with. Fixed Point Theorem in Probabilistic

CALDERON S REPRODUCING FORMULA FOR DUNKL CONVOLUTION

Two Coupled Oscillators / Normal Modes

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

Honours Introductory Maths Course 2011 Integration, Differential and Difference Equations

Practice Problem Set 3

LAGRANGIAN AND HAMILTONIAN MECHANICS WITH FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVES

Chapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?

Fractional Calculus. Connor Wiegand. 6 th June 2017

From Complex Fourier Series to Fourier Transforms

The Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma

Transcription:

Scholrs Journl of Phsics, Mhemics nd Sisics Sch. J. Phs. Mh. S. 5; (B:5-6 Scholrs Acdemic nd Scienific Publishers (SAS Publishers (An Inernionl Publisher for Acdemic nd Scienific Resources *Corresonding Auhor: Fez Fok Al Adeh Emil: hf@scs-ne.org How o rove he Riemnn Hohesis Fez Fok Al Adeh Presiden of he Srin Cosmologicl Socie, P.O.Bo:387,Dmscus, Sri ISSN 393-856 (Prin ISSN 393-864 (Online Absrc: I hve lred discovered simle roof of he Riemnn Hohesis. The hohesis ses h he nonrivil zeros of he Riemnn ze funcion hve rel r equl o.5. I ssume h n such zero is s + bi.i use inegrl clculus in he firs r of he roof. In he second r I emlo vriionl clculus. Through equions (5 o (59 I consider ( s fied eonen, nd verif h.5.from equion (6 onwrd I view ( s rmeer ( <.5 nd rrive conrdicion. A he end of he roof (from equion (73 nd hrough he ssumion h ( is rmeer, I verif gin h.5. Kewords: Definie Inegrel, Indefinie Inegrl, Vriionl Clculus. INTRODUCTION The Riemnn ze funcion is he funcion of he comle vrible s + bi (i, defined in he hlf lne > b he bsolue convergen series ( ( s s n nd in he whole comle lne b nlic coninuion. The funcion (s hs zeros he negive even inegers -, -4, nd one refers o hem s he rivil zeros. The Riemnn hohesis ses h he nonrivil zeros of (s hve rel r equl o.5. PROOF OF THE HYPOTHESIS We begin wih he equion ( (s And wih (3 s +bi (4 ( bi I is known h he nonrivil zeros of (s re ll comle. Their rel rs lie beween zero nd one. If < < hen (5 [ ] (s s s ( < < [] is he ineger funcion Hence (6 [ ] s Therefore Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 5

(7 ([ ] bi (8 ([ ] bi (9 ([ ] (cos( b log i sin( b log Sering he rel nd imginr rs we ge ( ([ ] cos( b log ( ([ ] sin( b log According o he funcionl equion, if (s hen ( s ( ([ ] sin( In equion ( relce he dumm vrible b he dumm vrible (3 ([ ] sin( b log d. Hence we ge besides equion ( We form he roduc of he inegrls (nd (3.This is jusified b he fc h boh inegrls ( nd (3 re bsoluel convergen.as o inegrl ( we noice h ([ ] sin( (( ( where ((z is he frcionl r of z, ((z< lim( + lim ( (( ( is ver smll osiive number (since (( whenever < + lim ( < + lim ( And s o inegrl (3 (( + ([ ] sin( d ([ ] sin( d ([]- sin ( Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 6

(( d lim ( d + lim( (( d ( is ver smll osiive number (since (( whenever < + lim( (( d < + d + Since he limis of inegrion do no involve or, he roduc cn be eressed s he double inegrl (4 ([ ] ([ ] sin( sin( d Thus (5 ([ ] ([ ] (cos( b log b log cos( b log b log d (6 ([ ] ([ ] (cos( cos( d Th is (7 ([ ] ([ ] cos( d ([ ] ([ ] cos( d Consider he inegrl on he righ-hnd side of equion (7 (8 ([ ] ([ ] cos( d dz In his inegrl mke he subsiuion z z The inegrl becomes dz (9 z ([ ] ([ ] cos( z d z z z Th is ( - z ([ ] ([ ] cos( z dzd z z This is equivlen o Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 7

( z ([ ] ([ ] cos( z dzd z z If we relce he dumm vrible z b he dumm vrible, he inegrl kes he form ( ([ ] ([ ] cos( b log d Rewrie his inegrl in he equivlen form (3 ( [ ] ([ ] cos( d Thus equion 7 becomes (4 ([ ] ([ ] cos( d ( [ ] ([ ] cos( d Wrie he ls equion in he form (5 ([ ] cos( b log { ( [ ] Le < be n rbirr smll osiive number. We consider he following regions in he lne. (6 The region of inegrion I [, [, (7 The lrge region I [, [, (8 The nrrow sri I [, [, ] (9 The nrrow sri I 3 [,] [, Noe h (3 I I I I 3 -([]-} d Denoe he inegrnd in he lef hnd side of equion (5 b (3 F (, ([ ] cos( { Le us find he limi of F (, s nd. This limi is given b (3 Lim [ - (( ] cos ( [ - (( + (( ] ((z is he frcionl r of he number z, ((z < ( [ ] -([]-} The bove limi vnishes,since ll he funcions [ - (( ],cos (, - ((, nd (( remin bounded s nd Noe h he funcion F (, is defined nd bounded in he region I. We cn rove h he inegrl (33 F(, d is bounded s follows I (34 F(, d [ - (( ] cos ( [ - (( + (( I I Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 8

] d I ( ( < ( [ - (( ] cos ( [ - (( + (( cos ( [ - (( + (( ] cos ( [ - (( + (( ] ] d cos ( [ - (( + (( [ (( + (( ] { lim( [ (( + (( [ (( + (( ] [ - (( ]d ] [ (( + (( ] + lim( ] } where is ver smll rbirr osiive. number. Since he inegrl lim( show h lim( [ (( + (( [ (( + (( ] is bounded, i remins o ] is bounded. Since >,hen (( nd we hve lim( lim( lim( < lim( ( [ [ [ + + (( ] + (( ] ] [ - (( ] d [ - (( ] d Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 9 [ (( + (( ]

Hence he boundedness of he inegrl F(, d is roved. Consider he region (35 I4I I3 We know h (36 F(, d F(, d + F(, d nd h I I I I4 (37 F(, d is bounded I From which we deduce h he inegrl (38 F(, d is bounded I4 Remember h (39 F(, d F(, d + F(, d I4 I I3 Consider he inegrl (4 F(, d F(, d I ( I { (( - (( } cos( ( { (( - (( } cos( d d ( { (( - (( } cos( d { (( - (( } d (This is becuse in his region ((. I is eviden h he inegrl bounded, his ws roved in he course of roving h he inegrl he inegrl I d Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms { (( - (( } is F(, d is bounded.also i is eviden h

is bounded. Thus we deduce h he inegrl (4 F(, d is bounded I Hence,ccording o equion(39,he inegrl F(, d is bounded. Now consider he inegrl (4 F(, d I3 We wrie i in he form (4 F(, d ( I3 ( This is becuse in his region (( ( ( ( (( cos (b log d (( d (( cos (b log d {(( I3 (( cos (b log d {(( } {(( } Now we consider he inegrl wih resec o (43 (lim (( d {(( } } d+ (lim (( d ( where is ver smll rbirr osiive number.( Noe h (( whenever <. Thus we hve (lim nd (lim Hence he inegrl (43 d (( d < (lim (( d is bounded. d Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms

Since cos (b logd (( cos (b logd (( d, we conclude h he inegrl is bounded funcion of. Le his funcion be H(. Thus we hve (44 (( cos (b logd H ( K ( K is osiive number Now equion (44 gives us (45 K (( cos (b logd K According o equion (4 we hve (46 F(, d ( I3 {(( } ( K K Since F(, d is bounded, hen I3 he inegrl {(( } (47 G is bounded We denoe he inegrnd of (47 b (48 F { (( - } (( cos (b log d {(( } {(( } {(( } is lso bounded. Therefore Le G [F] be he vriion of he inegrl G due o he vriion of he inegrnd F. Since (49 G [F] F (he inegrl (49 is indefinie ( here we do no consider s rmeer, rher we consider i s given eonen G[ F] We deduce h F( h is (5 G [F] F ( Bu we hve (5 G[F] G[ F] F( ( he inegrl (5 is indefinie F( Using equion (5 we deduce h (5 G[F] F( ( he inegrl (5 is indefinie (( Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms

Since G[F] is bounded cross he elemenr inervl [,], we mus hve h (53 G[F] is bounded cross his inervl From (5 we conclude h (54 G Since he vlue of [ F (55 lim ( Thus we mus hve h (56 (lim [ df F( [ F ] ( - [ F ] ( ] ( is bounded, we deduce from equion (54 h F mus remin bounded. { (( - }] is bounded. Firs we comue (57 (lim Aling L 'Hosil ' rule we ge (58 (lim (lim d( We conclude from (56 h he roduc (59 (lim { (( - }mus remin bounded. Assume h.5.( remember h we considered s given eonen This vlue.5 will gurnee h he quni { (( - }.Therefore, in his cse (.5 (56 will roch zero s ( will remin bounded in he limi s ( hence remin bounded. Now suose h <.5.In his cse we consider s rmeer. Hence we hve (6 G [] F (, (he inegrl (6 is indefinie Thus G (6 [ ] F (, Bu we hve h (6 G [] G [ ] ( he inegrl (6 is indefinie Subsiuing from (6 we ge (63 G [] F(, ( he inegrl (63 is indefinie We reurn o equion (49 nd wrie (64 G lim ( F ( is ver smll osiive number << { F ( lim ( F ( } - lim ( Le us comue df nd Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 3

(65 lim ( F ( lim ( Thus equion (64 reduces o (66 G F ( - lim ( df (( Noe h he lef hnd side of equion (66 is bounded. Equion (63 gives us (67 G lim ( F ( is he sme smll osiive number << We cn esil rove h he wo inegrls df nd F re bsoluel convergen.since he limis of inegrion do no involve n vrible, we form he roduc of (66 nd (67 (68 K lim( df F lim( FdF ( K is bounded quni Th is F F (69 K lim( [ ( - ( ] [ ( - ( ] We conclude from his equion h F F (7 { [ ( - lim( ( ] [ ( ] } is bounded. ( since lim(, which is he sme hing s lim( F F Since ( is bounded, we deduce once h mus remin bounded in he limi s (, which is he sme hing s sing h F mus remin bounded in he limi s (. Therefore. (7 lim ( (( mus remin bounded Bu (( (( (7 lim ( lim( (( lim( lim( I is eviden h his ls limi is unbounded. This conrdics our conclusion (7 h lim ( (( mus remin bounded (for <.5 Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 4

Therefore he cse <.5 is rejeced.we verif here h,for.5 (7remins bounded s (. We hve h (73 (( < - Therefore (( (74 lim(.5 ( We consider he limi (75 lim(.5 ( We wrie (76 (lim (.5 + Hence we ge (77 lim(.5 ( lim ( < lim(.5 ( (.5 Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 5 lim ( (Since lim( Therefore we mus l L 'Hosil ' rule wih resec o in he limiing rocess (75 ( (78 lim(.5 ( lim(.5 ( ( lim(.5 ( Now we wrie gin (79 (lim (.5 + Thus he limi (78 becomes ( (8 lim(.5 ( (.5 lim (.5 lim ( (.5 ( Since lim ( lim ( (.5.5.5 We mus l L 'Hosil ' rule.5 (.5 (.5 (8 lim ( lim ( lim (.5. 5.5 (.5 Thus we hve verified here h,for.5 (7 roches zero s ( nd hence remins bounded. We consider he cse >.5. This cse is lso rejeced, since ccording o he funcionl equion, if ( (s (s + bi hs roo wih >.5,hen i mus hve noher roo wih noher vlue of <.5. Bu we hve lred rejeced his ls cse wih <.5 Thus we re lef wih he onl ossible vlue of which is.5 Therefore.5 This roves he Riemnn Hohesis. REFERENCES. Tich mrsh EC; The Theor of he Riemnn ze funcion.london : Oford Universi Press,999.

. Aosol,Tom M; Mhemicl Anlsis. Reding,Msschuses ;Addison wesle Publishing Comn,974. 3. Edwrds HM; Riemnn s ze funcion. New York : Acdemic Press,Inc,974. 4. Aosol TM; Inroducion o Anlic Number Theor, New York: Sringer Verlg,976. 5. Koblis N, P- dic Numbers, P dic Anlsis, nd Ze Funcions. New York : Sringer Verlg,984. 6. Geiner W, Reinhrd J; Field Qunizion. Berlin :Sringer Verlg,996. Avilble Online: h://ssjournls.com/sjms 6