DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM

Similar documents
The WIMPless Miracle and the DAMA Puzzle

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PARTICLE DARK MATTER

MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE

WIMPs and superwimps. Jonathan Feng UC Irvine. MIT Particle Theory Seminar 17 March 2003

SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS

SUSY AND COSMOLOGY. Jonathan Feng UC Irvine. SLAC Summer Institute 5-6 August 2003

IMPLICATIONS OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FOR COSMOLOGY

DARK MATTERS. Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine. 2 June 2005 UCSC Colloquium

Dark Matter WIMP and SuperWIMP

The Story of Wino Dark matter

RECENT PROGRESS IN SUSY DARK MATTER

Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum

Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00

Week 3 - Part 2 Recombination and Dark Matter. Joel Primack

DARK MATTER FROM THE EARLY UNIVERSE AND PARTICLE PHYSICS CANDIDATES

COSMOLOGY AT COLLIDERS

MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS

Gravitino LSP as Dark Matter in the Constrained MSSM

Dark Matter from Decays

New Physics beyond the Standard Model: from the Earth to the Sky

Overview of Dark Matter models. Kai Schmidt-Hoberg

The Dark Matter Puzzle and a Supersymmetric Solution. Andrew Box UH Physics

DARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1

Astroparticle Physics and the LC

Astroparticle Physics at Colliders

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

Beyond Collisionless DM

Supersymmetry in Cosmology

Beyond standard model physics signatures in small scale structure

Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK MATTER

Cosmology/DM - I. Konstantin Matchev

Supersymmetric dark matter with low reheating temperature of the Universe

Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry

Dynamics of the Peccei-Quinn Scale

Relating the Baryon Asymmetry to WIMP Miracle Dark Matter

Supersymmetry Basics. J. Hewett SSI J. Hewett

Dark Matter from Non-Standard Cosmology

Models of New Physics for Dark Matter

Pseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model

Asymmetric Sneutrino Dark Matter

A natural solution to the gravitino overabundance problem

LHC HIGGS BOSON IMPLICATIONS FOR SUPERSYMMETRY

kev sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Extensions of the Standard Model

Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations

The Four Basic Ways of Creating Dark Matter Through a Portal

Dark Matter II. Marco Cirelli. (CNRS IPhT Saclay) December th TRR Winter School - Passo del Tonale. Reviews on Dark Matter: NewDark

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009

On Symmetric/Asymmetric Light Dark Matter

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

The Linear Collider and the Preposterous Universe

Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model

Non-Thermal Dark Matter from Moduli Decay. Bhaskar Dutta. Texas A&M University

Neutralino Dark Matter and SUSY Spectroscopy. M. E. Peskin June 2004 YITP

Little Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology

Sho IWAMOTO. 15 Sep Osaka University. Based on [ ] in collaboration with M. Abdullah, J. L. Feng, and B. Lillard (UC Irvine)

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: From a Particle Physics Perspective

SuperWeakly Interacting Massive Particle Dark Matter

THE DARK UNIVERSE. Jonathan Feng Department of Physics and Astronomy. UCI Distinguished Faculty Lecture 26 October 2004

Beyond the SM: SUSY. Marina Cobal University of Udine

IS MINIMAL SUSY DEAD? Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine SLAC Theory Seminar, 7 November 2012

Lecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model

THE FUTURE OF DARK MATTER AND DARK FORCES

Sho IWAMOTO. 7 Nov HEP phenomenology joint Cavendish DAMTP U. Cambridge

Dark Matter in Particle Physics

Discovery Physics at the Large Hadron Collider

THE STATUS OF NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER

Chern-Simons portal Dark Matter

Efficient coannihilation process through strong Higgs self-coupling in LKP dark matter annihilation

Positron Fraction from Dark Matter Annihilation in the CMSSM

A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:

Self-interacting asymmetric dark matter

3.5 kev X-ray line and Supersymmetry

Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM

String Theory in the LHC Era

Introduction ffl MSSM with R-parity too many free parameters (124): mostly come from the flavor sector in the soft SUSY breaking Lagrangian generic FC

Collider Searches for Dark Matter

The Lightest Higgs Boson and Relic Neutralino in the MSSM with CP Violation

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

Dark Matter Decay and Cosmic Rays

SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches

How high could SUSY go?

Inelastic Dark Matter and DAMA

Making Dark Matter. Manuel Drees. Bonn University & Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics. Making Dark Matter p. 1/35

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

Implications of a Heavy Z Gauge Boson

The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos

Possible Connections in Colliders, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy

Antiproton Limits on Decaying Gravitino Dark Matter

Leptogenesis with Composite Neutrinos

Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002

Yukawa and Gauge-Yukawa Unification

Measuring Dark Matter Properties with High-Energy Colliders

Self-interacting asymmetric dark matter. Kallia Petraki Université Pierre et Marie Curie, LPTHE, Paris

Baryon-Dark Matter Coincidence. Bhaskar Dutta. Texas A&M University

Particle Physics and Cosmology II: Dark Matter

Transcription:

DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM Work with Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar, John Learned, Arvind Rajaraman, Louie Strigari, Fumihiro Takayama, Huitzu Tu, Haibo Yu Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine SLAC NAL 18 March 2009

DARK MATTER Best evidence for new physics Unambiguous Intimately connected to central problems: electroweak symmetry breaking and structure formation Candidate masses and interactions span many orders of magnitude HEPAP/AAAC DMSAG Subpanel (2007) 18 Mar 09 Feng 2

THE WIMP MIRACLE Assume a new (heavy) particle X is initially in thermal equilibrium Its relic density is Kolb, Turner } m X ~ m weak ~ 100 GeV g X ~ g weak ~ 0.6 Ω X ~ 0.1 Remarkable coincidence: particle physics independently predicts particles with the right density to be dark matter 18 Mar 09 Feng 3

NEUTRALINO DARK MATTER Supersymmetry Naturalness force unification radiative EWSB Neutralino naturally emerges as Lightest (stable) Weakly-interacting ~100 GeV Excellent DM candidate

NEUTRALINO IMPLICATIONS Neutralinos must interact with the SM efficiently χ χ Efficient production now (Particle colliders) q q Efficient annihilation now (Indirect detection) Efficient scattering now (Direct detection) 18 Mar 09 Feng 5

NEUTRALINO IMPLICATIONS Neutralinos must interact with the SM efficiently Efficient production now EXCITING!(Particle colliders) χ χ q q Efficient annihilation now (Indirect detection) Efficient scattering now (Direct detection) 18 Mar 09 Feng 6

BACKGROUND CHECK: SKELETONS IN THE CLOSET Minor skeleton: thermal relic density Majorana P-wave suppressed GUT/RGE Bino suppressed Yellow: Before 2003 Red: After 2003 Feng, Matchev, Wilczek (2003) 18 Mar 09 Feng 7

MAJOR SKELETON: THE FLAVOR PROBLEM Neutralino DM m G > m χ m G characterizes the size of gravitational effects, which generically violate flavor symmetries Current bounds require m G < 0.01 m χ There are ways to reconcile χ DM with flavor constraints, but none is especially compelling 18 Mar 09 Feng 8

FLAVOR-CONSERVING MODELS There are well-known SUSY models that naturally conserve flavor: gauge-mediated SUSY-breaking models Dine, Nelson, Nir, Shirman (1995); Dimopoulos, Dine, Raby, Thomas (1996); Can we find DM candidates in these models? 3 key features m G << m χ Several sectors of particles Superpartner masses m ~ (gauge couplings) 2 18 Mar 09 Feng 9

PREVIOUS SUGGESTIONS 1 Thermal gravitinos: the original SUSY DM scenario Pagels, Primack (1982) Universe cools from T ~ M Pl, gravitinos decouple while relativistic, expect n G ~ n eq (cf. neutrinos) Ω G h 2 0.1 (m G / 80 ev) Lyman-α constraints m G > 2 kev Could be saved by late entropy production No use of WIMP miracle Viel et al. (2006); Seljak et al. (2006) Baltz, Murayama (2001) 18 Mar 09 Feng 10

PREVIOUS SUGGESTIONS 2 Messenger sneutrino DM Han, Hempfling (1997) Messenger sneutrino has right relic density for m ~ 1-3 TeV No use of WIMP miracle 18 Mar 09 Feng 11

PREVIOUS SUGGESTIONS 3 Goldilocks SUSY Feng,, Smith, Takayama, (2007) Eliminate both skeletons simultaneously: χ overproduced, decays to gravitino that is light enough to solve the flavor problem, but heavy enough to be all of DM Ω χ ~ m χ2, Ω G ~ m χ m G ; flavor m G / m χ < 0.01 Solution guaranteed for sufficiently large m χ, m G But is it natural? Consider mgmsb 18 Mar 09 Feng 12

GOLDILOCKS SUSY N 5 =1, tanβ=10, μ>0 BBN had BBN EM χ LSP χ LSP Ω χ ~ 100, m χ ~ 1 TeV, m G ~ 1 GeV Uses the WIMP miracle Astrophysics constraints CP solved, warm G DM 18 Mar 09 Feng 13

A NEW APPROACH Feng, Kumar (2008) Consider standard GMSB with one or more hidden sectors Each hidden sector has its own matter content, gauge groups, couplings 18 Mar 09 Feng 14

THE WIMPLESS MIRACLE Particle Physics Cosmology Ω depends only on the SUSY Breaking sector: Ω X ~ Ω WIMP ~ Ω DM Superpartner masses depend on gauge couplings Hidden sector generically has the right relic density 18 Mar 09 Feng 15

THE WIMPLESS MIRACLE The thermal relic density constrains only one combination of g X and m X These models map out the remaining degree of freedom g X WIMPs WIMPless DM m X This framework decouples the WIMP miracle from WIMPs, candidates have a range of masses/couplings, but always the right relic density The flavor problem becomes a virtue Naturally accommodates multi-component DM, all with relevant Ω 18 Mar 09 Feng 16

HOW LARGE CAN HIDDEN SECTORS BE? Feng, Tu, Yu (2008) Hidden sectors contribute to expansion rate ξ RH = ratio of reheat temperatures BBN: N ν = 3.24 ± 1.2, excludes an identical copy of the MSSM Cyburt et al. (2004) MSSM MSSM (1 gen) But this is sensitive to temperature differences 18 Mar 09 Feng 17

WIMPLESS DETECTION Feng, Kumar, Strigari (2008); Feng, Kumar, Learned, Strigari (2008) WIMPless DM has no SM gauge interactions, but may interact through Yukawa couplings For example, introduce connectors Y with both MSSM and hidden charge Y particles mediate both annihilation to and scattering with MSSM particles X X λ λ Y f f 18 Mar 09 Feng 18

EXAMPLE Assume WIMPless DM X is a scalar, add fermion connectors Y, interacting through XX ff preserves WIMPless miracle, as long as λ f < 1 For f = b, Y s are 4th generation mirror quarks, constrained by collider direct searches, precision electroweak, Yukawa perturbativity: 250 GeV < m Y < 500 GeV Kribs, Plehn, Spannowsky, Tait (2007); Fok, Kribs (2008) 18 Mar 09 Feng 19

DIRECT DETECTION: DAMA Collision rate should change as Earth s velocity adds constructively/ destructively with the Sun s. Drukier, Freese, Spergel (1986) DAMA: 8σ signal with T ~ 1 year, max ~ June 2 DAMA (2008) 18 Mar 09 Feng 20

CHANNELING DAMA s result is puzzling, in part because the favored region was considered excluded by others This may be ameliorated by astrophysics and channeling: in crystalline detectors, efficiency for nuclear recoil energy photons depends on direction TEXONO (2007) Channeling reduces threshold, shifts allowed region to lower masses. Consistency possible, but requires uncomfortably low WIMP masses (~ GeV) Gondolo, Gelmini (2005) 18 Mar 09 Drobyshevski (2007), DAMA (2007) Feng 21

DAMA AND WIMPLESS DM WIMPless DM naturally explains DAMA with λ b ~ 0.3-1 (cf. typical neutralino: m ~ 100 GeV, σ SI ~10-8 pb) m Y = 400 GeV 18 Mar 09 Feng 22

INDIRECT DETECTION Indirect searches also promising for low masses, even for smooth halos DAMA parameters, NFW, J ~ 4 Fermi Discovery Reach 18 Mar 09 Feng 23

HIDDEN CHARGED DM This requires that an m X particle be stable. Is this natural? MSSM Flavor-free MSSM O(1) Yukawas m w ~GeV sparticles, W, Z, t q, l 0 p, e, γ, ν, G m X sparticles, W, Z, q, l, t (or τ) 0 g, γ, ν, G If the hidden sector is a flavor-free MSSM, natural DM candidate is any hidden charged particle, stabilized by exact U(1) EM symmetry 18 Mar 09 Feng 24

HIDDEN CHARGED DM Hidden charged particles exchange energy through Rutherford scattering Non-spherical galaxy cores DM can t be too collisional, require E/(dE/dt) > 10 10 years Feng, Kaplinghat, Tu, Yu (2009) Excluded ξ RH =0.8 tanθ~1 ξ RH =0.1 tanθ~1 ξ RH =0.1 tanθ~10 Annihilates through weak (to neutrinos) and EM (to photons) m X ~ 10 GeV (100 MeV) allowed for tanθ = 1 (10) See also Ackerman, Buckley, Carroll, Kamionkowski (2008) 18 Mar 09 Feng 25

ANNIHILATION Annihilation is Sommerfeld enhanced by α/v Strong constraint from protohaloes, formed at z ~ 200 with low velocity dispersion Kamionkowski, Profumo (2008) Can m γ = 0? Yes! T kd is lower than for WIMPs α ~ 10-6 for m X ~ GeV Feng, Kaplinghat, Tu, Yu (2009) 18 Mar 09 Feng 26

CONCLUSIONS Neutralino DM has a flavor problem Reconciliation qualitatively new DM candidates WIMPless dark matter No flavor problem (GMSB) Preserves WIMP miracle Large direct, indirect signals Explains DAMA, with testable implications Motivates hidden charged DM with exact hidden U(1) EM Collisional, implications for structure formation 18 Mar 09 Feng 27