Z. Hradil, J. Řeháček

Similar documents
Quantum estimation to enhance classical wavefront sensing

Testing of quantum phase in matter-wave optics

Analogy between optimal spin estimation and interferometry

Uncertainty relations from Fisher information

Quantum information processing using linear optics

FIG. 16: A Mach Zehnder interferometer consists of two symmetric beam splitters BS1 and BS2

Maximal Entropy for Reconstruction of Back Projection Images

Linear-optical quantum information processing: A few experiments

Single-Particle Interference Can Witness Bipartite Entanglement

Synchrotron Radiation Representation in Phase Space

Quantum Minimax Theorem (Extended Abstract)

Progress in Quantum Lithography and Ghost Imaging

Wavefront-sensor tomography for measuring spatial coherence

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 14 Mar 2001

Quantum estimation for quantum technology

Physics 403. Segev BenZvi. Choosing Priors and the Principle of Maximum Entropy. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Rochester

Do we need quantum light to test quantum memory? M. Lobino, C. Kupchak, E. Figueroa, J. Appel, B. C. Sanders, Alex Lvovsky

The 46g BGO bolometer

Rich Tomography. Bill Lionheart, School of Mathematics, University of Manchester and DTU Compute. July 2014

Experimental realisation of the weak measurement process

Joint measurement of interference and path observables in optics and neutron interferometry 1

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Why Bayesian? Rigorous approach to address statistical estimation problems. The Bayesian philosophy is mature and powerful.

Mathematical and Physical Examination of the Locality Condition in Bell s Theorem

Detection of X-Rays. Solid state detectors Proportional counters Microcalorimeters Detector characteristics

MITOCW watch?v=0usje5vtiks

Optimal discrimination of quantum measurements. Michal Sedlák. Department of Optics, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Noise and errors in state reconstruction

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

1.1.1 Bell Inequality - Spin correlation

Interference and the lossless lossy beam splitter

3.1 The Plane Mirror Resonator 3.2 The Spherical Mirror Resonator 3.3 Gaussian modes and resonance frequencies 3.4 The Unstable Resonator

Fiber Gratings p. 1 Basic Concepts p. 1 Bragg Diffraction p. 2 Photosensitivity p. 3 Fabrication Techniques p. 4 Single-Beam Internal Technique p.

Resonance Interaction Free. Measurement. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, (1996) Harry Paul and Mladen Pavičić, 1

Abel Inversion using the Maximum Entropy Method

FOUNDATIONAL EXPERIMENTS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

Neutron interferometry. Hofer Joachim

Coherence, Discord, and Entanglement: Activating one resource into another and beyond

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates

Path Entanglement. Liat Dovrat. Quantum Optics Seminar

Erwin Schrödinger and his cat

Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light

Application of Structural Physical Approximation to Partial Transpose in Teleportation. Satyabrata Adhikari Delhi Technological University (DTU)

Quantitative Assessment of Scattering Contributions in MeV-Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography

Experimental multi-photon-resolving detector using a single avalanche photodiode

Supplementary Materials for

Triggered qutrits for Quantum Communication protocols

Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality

Remote entanglement of transmon qubits

Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning and Statistical Models

Use of the likelihood principle in physics. Statistics II

Similarities and Differences Between Two-Particle and Three-Particle Interference

Matter Waves. Chapter 5

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 29 Aug 1997

13: Variational inference II

Quantum Photonic Integrated Circuits

Particle Filters. Pieter Abbeel UC Berkeley EECS. Many slides adapted from Thrun, Burgard and Fox, Probabilistic Robotics

Foundations of Image Science

Supplementary Figures

Monte Carlo Methods:

CLASS NOTES Models, Algorithms and Data: Introduction to computing 2018

Content of the lectures

Coherent states, beam splitters and photons

Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

Phase-shifting coronagraph

Phys 531 Lecture 27 6 December 2005

(Extended) Kalman Filter

Birefringence dispersion in a quartz crystal retrieved from a channelled spectrum resolved by a fibre-optic spectrometer

Measurement of orbital angular momentum of a single photon: a noninterferrometric

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT FOR OPTICAL LITHOGRAPHY AND MICROSCOPY BEYOND THE RAYLEIGH LIMIT

Review: Directed Models (Bayes Nets)

Bayesian Regression Linear and Logistic Regression

THE DELAYED CHOICE QUANTUM EXPERIMENT

Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information; Phys. Rev. A 87, (2013).

Quantum Nonlocality of N-qubit W States

1 Statistics Aneta Siemiginowska a chapter for X-ray Astronomy Handbook October 2008

Ping Pong Protocol & Auto-compensation

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)

Error analysis for efficiency

Physics of Light and Optics

Advanced statistical methods for data analysis Lecture 1

A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics

Introduction to Statistical Methods for High Energy Physics

How to use the simulator

University of New Mexico

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL OPTICS

Self-Phase Modulation in Optical Fiber Communications: Good or Bad?

The unreasonable effectiveness of quantum theory: Logical inference approach

10. Composite Hypothesis Testing. ECE 830, Spring 2014

October 4, :33 ws-rv9x6 Book Title main page 1. Chapter 1. Measurement of Minimum Bias Observables with ATLAS

SLAM Techniques and Algorithms. Jack Collier. Canada. Recherche et développement pour la défense Canada. Defence Research and Development Canada

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Bishop Chapter 2: Probability Distributions

Data analysis for neutron spectrometry with liquid scintillators: applications to fusion diagnostics

Course Syllabus. OSE6211 Imaging & Optical Systems, 3 Cr. Instructor: Bahaa Saleh Term: Fall 2017

Polarization. Polarization. Physics Waves & Oscillations 4/3/2016. Spring 2016 Semester Matthew Jones. Two problems to be considered today:

Optics.

Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement

A Brief Introduction to Medical Imaging. Outline

Transcription:

Likelihood and entropy for quantum tomography Z. Hradil, J. Řeháček Department of Optics Palacký University,Olomouc Czech Republic Work was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education.

Collaboration SLO UP ( O. Haderka) Vienna: A. Zeilinger, H. Rauch, M. Zawisk Bari: S. Pascazio Others: HMI Berlin, ILL Grenoble

Outline Motivation Inverse problems Quantum measurements vs. estimations MaxLik principle MaxEnt principle Several examples Summary

Motivation 1: Diffraction on the slit as detection of the direction

Measurement according to geometrical optics: propagating rays h d px sin Measurement according to the scalar wave theory: diffraction P( ) ( 1 ) sinc2 a p x 2h, ( ak 2d )

Estimation: posterior probability distribution P post p( ) Gaussian approximation Fisher information: width of post. distribution F p d log p d 2 Uncertainty relations x p, p pp p p x p = h 2, p =1 F

Motivation 2: Inversion problems I j cji i registered mean values j = 1,..M desired signal i= 1,..N N number of signal bins (resolution) M number of scans (measurement)

Over-determined problems M>N (engineering solution: credible interpretation) Well defined problems M=N (linear inversion may appear as l posed problem due to the imposed constrain Under-determined problems (realm of physics) M<N

Inversion problems: Tomography Medicine: CT, NMR, PET, etc.: nondestructive visualization of 3D objects Back-Projection (Inverse Radon transform) ill-posed fails problem in some applications

Motivation 3: All resources are limited!

Elements of quantum theory Probability in quantum mechanics pi T(r i ) Desired signal: density matrix 0 Measurement: positive-valued operator measure (POVM) i 0

Complete measurement: need not be orthogona i i 1 Generic measurement: scans go beyond the space of the reconstruction G i i 0 G G 1/2 i 1/2 i 1G

Stern-Gerlach device Quantum observables: q-numbers

Mach-Zehnder interferometer

Principle of MaxLik Maximum Likelihood (MaxLik) principle selects the most likely configuration Likelihood L quantifies the degree of belief in certain hypothesis under the condition of the given data. logl f i logpi(ρ) i

Philosophy behind Bet Always On the Highest Chance! MaxLik principle is not a rule that requires justification. Mathematical formulation: Fisher

MaxLik estimation Measurement: prior info posterior info p D ρ p ρ D p ρ Bayes rule: p D The most likely configuration is taken as the result of estimation Prior information and existing constraints can be easily incorporated

Likelihood is the convex functional on the convex set of density matrices Equation for extremal states Rρ=ρ R or R i fi = 1ρ or p(i ) j RρR=ρ

MaxLik inversion: Interpretation Linear i Π i 1 Tr(ρ Π i) = f i MaxLik i π i = 1ρ Tr(ρ π i) f i πi = fi Π i pi (ρ )

Various projections are counted with different accuracy. Accuracy depends on the unknown quantum state. Optimal estimation strategy must re-interpret the registered data and estimate the state simultaneously. Optimal estimation 2 ( n) = Np(1 p)

MaxLik = Maximum of Relative Entropy logl (f p) = i f i logpi (ρ ) i f i logf i Solution will exhibit plateau of MaxLik states for under-determined problems (ambiguity)!

hilosophy behind Maximum Entropy Laplace's Principle of Insufficient Reasoning: If there is no reason to prefer among several possibilities, than the best strategy is to consider them as equally likely and pick up the average. rinciple of Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) selects he most unbiased solution consistent with he given constraints. Mathematical formulation: Jaynes

S = - Tr(ρ log ρ ) ( A i) Constraints f Trρ Entropy i MaxEnt solution -1 ρ =[Tr exp( i ia i ) ] exp( i ia i ) Lagrange multipliers are given by the solution the set of nonlinear constraints f Tr[ρ( )A i ] i

MaxLik: the most optimistic guess. MaxEnt: the most pesimistic guess. Problem: Inconsistent Problem: Ambiguity of constraints. solutions! Proposal: Maximize the entropy over the convex set of MaxLik states! Convexity of entropy will guarantee the uniqueness of the solution. MaxLik will make the all the constraints

MaxEnt assisted MaxLik inversion Implementation Parametrize MaxEnt solution Maximize alternately entropy and likelihood

MaxEnt assisted MaxLik strategy earching for the worst among the best solution

Interpretation of MaxEnt assisted MaxLik The plateau of solutions on extended space est 1 Regular part Classical part

MaxLik strategy Specify the space H (arbitrary but sufficiently large) Find the state Specify the space H MaxLik MaxLik Specify the Fisher information matrix F

Several examples Phase estimation Reconstruction of Wigner function Transmission tomography Reconstruction of photocount statistics Image reconstruction Vortex beam analysis Quantification of entanglement Operational information

(Neutron) Transmission tomography Exponential attenuation I h, I 0 e x,y d h,

Filtered back projection Maximum likelihood J. Řeháček, Z. Hradil, M. Zawisky, W. Treimer, M. Strobl: Maximum Likelihood absorption tomography, Europhys. Lett. 59 694-700 (2002).

MaxEnt assisted MaxLik merical simulations using 19 phase scans, 101 pixels each (M=19 onstruction on the grid 201x 201 bins (N= 40401) Object MaxLik1 MaxLik2 MaxEnt+Lik

Fiber-loop detector Commercially available single-photon detectors do not have single-photon resolution Cheap (partial) solution: beam splitting Coincidences tell us about multi-photon content Řeháček et al.,multiple-photon resolving fiber-loop detector, Phys. Rev. A (2003) 061801(R

Fiber loop as a multi-channel photon analyser

nversion of Bernouli distribution for zero outco m ( 1 η ) m=0 ρ mm p0 = Example: detection of 2 events = 4 p 00 p 10 p 01 p m 1 1T (2 m 1 (2 m m 1 1T) m m 11 1 T) m p00 1 p00 p10 p01 1 T) m p00 m channels

Results of MaxLik inversion: True statistics: (a) Poissonian (b) Composite (d) Gamma (d) BoseEinstein

True statistics: 50/50 superposition of Poissonian statistics with mean numbers1 and 10 Data: up to 5 counted events (= 32 channels) Mesh: 100 Original MaxLik MaxLik & MaxLik

Thank you!