C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

Similar documents
1 Measurement and expectation values

1 Recall what is Spin

i = cos 2 0i + ei sin 2 1i

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11

C/CS/Phys 191 Uncertainty principle, Spin Algebra 10/11/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 13

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

Homework assignment 3: due Thursday, 10/26/2017

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

The Stern-Gerlach experiment and spin

PH425 Spins Homework 5 Due 4 pm. particles is prepared in the state: + + i 3 13

1 Readings. 2 Unitary Operators. C/CS/Phys C191 Unitaries and Quantum Gates 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Lecture 8

Prob (solution by Michael Fisher) 1

Lecture3 (and part of lecture 4).

Assignment 2 Solutions. 1. The general state of a spin half particle with spin component S n = S ˆn = 1 2 can be shown to be given by

Physics 113!!!!! Spring 2009!! Quantum Theory Seminar #5

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Gates and Universality 9/22/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 8. a b b d. w. Therefore, U preserves norms and angles (up to sign).

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Graduate Quantum Mechanics I: Prelims and Solutions (Fall 2015)

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Final exam

PHYSICS 304 QUANTUM PHYSICS II (2005) Assignment 1 Solutions

Quantum Entanglement and Error Correction

conventions and notation

Problem Set # 8 Solutions

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Appendix: SU(2) spin angular momentum and single spin dynamics

Physics 4022 Notes on Density Matrices

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

Physics 115C Homework 2

P3317 HW from Lecture 15 and Recitation 8

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Final Exam Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall Duration: 2h 30m

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Physics 342 Lecture 27. Spin. Lecture 27. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

. Here we are using the standard inner-product over C k to define orthogonality. Recall that the inner-product of two vectors φ = i α i.

Rotation Matrices. Chapter 21

Unitary Dynamics and Quantum Circuits

Singlet State Correlations

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Sommerfeld (1920) noted energy levels of Li deduced from spectroscopy looked like H, with slight adjustment of principal quantum number:

PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix

Likewise, any operator, including the most generic Hamiltonian, can be written in this basis as H11 H

Graduate Class, Atomic and Laser Physics: Rabi flopping and quantum logic gates

Vector Spaces in Quantum Mechanics

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2013 Assignment 3

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

PH 425 Quantum Measurement and Spin Winter SPINS Lab 2

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 12 Orbital Angular Momentum and Spherical Harmonics

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Lecture 10: Eigenvalue Estimation

PHYS Quantum Mechanics I - Fall 2011 Problem Set 7 Solutions

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics

b) (5 points) Give a simple quantum circuit that transforms the state

Homework 3. 1 Coherent Control [22 pts.] 1.1 State vector vs Bloch vector [8 pts.]

C/CS/Phys C191 Grover s Quantum Search Algorithm 11/06/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 21

4. Two-level systems. 4.1 Generalities

Homework 3 - Solutions

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

Lecture 18: 3D Review, Examples

Quantum Communication & Computation Using Spin Chains

The Schrödinger Equation

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prelude to Nuclear Shell Model) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle In the microscopic world,

C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell 10/06/07 Fall 2009 Lecture 12

The Framework of Quantum Mechanics

Angular momentum and spin

1 Algebra of State Vectors

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 20, March 8, 2006

Chapter 2. Basic Principles of Quantum mechanics

UNM Physics 452/581: Introduction to Quantum Information, Problem Set 3, Fall 2007

Lab #2 - Two Degrees-of-Freedom Oscillator

Spin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators. Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry

Quantum Entanglement. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 Entangled Two-Particle States

1 Position Representation of Quantum State Function

Theory and Experiment

Requirements for scaleable QIP

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

C/CS/Phys C191 Amplitude Amplification, Quantum Zeno, Vaidman s bomb 11/10/09 Fall 2009 Lecture 22

P3317 HW from Lecture 7+8 and Recitation 4

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

Chm 331 Fall 2015, Exercise Set 4 NMR Review Problems

CS/Ph120 Homework 1 Solutions

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

8.04 Spring 2013 April 09, 2013 Problem 1. (15 points) Mathematical Preliminaries: Facts about Unitary Operators. Uφ u = uφ u

DON T PANIC! If you get stuck, take a deep breath and go on to the next question. Come back to the question you left if you have time at the end.

r 2 dr h2 α = 8m2 q 4 Substituting we find that variational estimate for the energy is m e q 4 E G = 4

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Systems of Linear ODEs

Introduction to quantum information processing

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Review of the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Transcription:

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/3/05 1. Using the standard basis (i.e. 0 and 1, eigenstates of Ŝ z, calculate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors associated with measuring the component of spin along an arbitrary direction ˆn for a spin- 1 system. (S ˆn = Ŝ x n x + Ŝ y n y + Ŝ z n z as in class. Show your work. Answer: We first note that the arbitrary unit vector is expressed in the standard spherical coordinates as n = (n x,n y,n z = (cosφsinθ,sinφsinθ,cosθ. With the spin operators S i just proportional to the Pauli matrices, we see that the operator Ŝ n is expressed in matrix form: Ŝ n = Ŝ x n x +Ŝ y n y +Ŝ z n z h cosφsinθ + h ( 0 i 0 sinφsinθ + h ( 0 1 cosθ (1 This is readily simplified to give: Ŝ n h ( cosθ e φ sinθ e iφ sinθ cosθ ( Our task is now to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this matrix. Nontrivial eigenvalues are the solution to the determinant equation: h cosθ λ e iφ sinθ eφ sinθ cosθ λ = 0 (3 This gives the equation λ = h 4, with solutions λ = ± h. Let s just look at the first eigenvalue λ = h and find its associated eigenvector. ( cosθ λ e φ sinθ e iφ sinθ cosθ λ ( a b ( a = b (4 Just the first row gives the following equation: cosθa+e φ sinθb = a (5 This is readily rearranged to give: ( 1 cosθ b = ae iφ sinθ (6 C/CS/Phys 191, Spring 005 1

This equation simplifies further by recalling some trigonometric relations (cosθ = 1 sin θ, sinθ = sin θ cos θ. We then obtain: b = ae iφ sin θ cos θ (7 This doesn t uniquely determine a and b yet, but we also have the constraint a + b = 1. Plugging the above equation into the normalization constraint gives: a + sin θ a = 1 a = cos θ cos θ a = cosθ We are free to pick the phase of a because all that matters physically is the relative phase between a and b. Therefore, we can just choose the phase of a to be zero and we have a = cos θ. b is then given by b = ae iφ sin θ cos θ = e iφ sin θ. Our eigenstate +n with eigenvalue + h/ is thus: (8 ( cos θ +n e iφ sin θ +n = cos θ 0 +eiφ sin θ 1 (9 This state should of course look familiar as the generalized spin vector on the Bloch sphere. We might have guessed! Similar algebra will readily show that the other eigenvector n with eigenvalue h/ is given by: n = sin θ 0 +eφ cos θ 1 (10. Suppose 10,000 electrons are prepared in the ψ = 0 spin state and then shot through a Stern- Gerlach device oriented with North South magnet poles aligned 60 from the +ẑ-direction. About how many electrons go into each of the two resulting beams? Answer: If we want to know the probability for measuring a ket ψ in a state φ, the probability is just given by: P φ = φ ψ (11 In this case, particle is in state ψ = 0 and we are measuring in the basis of θ 60 o. The two eigenstates in this basis are (following problem 1: +n = cos θ 0 +eiφ sin θ 1 = cos(30o 0 +e i(0 sin(30 o 1 = 3 0 + 1 1 (1 n = 1 3 0 + 1 (13 These give the probabilities P up = +n 0 = 3 4 and P down = n 0 = 1 4. We should therefore expect 7,500 electrons in the upper beam and,500 in the lower beam. C/CS/Phys 191, Spring 005

3. Consider a qubit comprised of a single spin- 1 electron. How would you construct a NOT gate in the laboratory to act on this qubit? If your gate involves building a magnet, then please specify the exact orientation, amplitude, and time duration of any proposed applied magnetic fields. Answer: The NOT gate in matrix mechanics looks like ( development operator that looks like Û(t = e Ŝn h m 0 1 t = as in standard matrix mechanics Ŝ x h.. We want to engineer a time. Ŝ x looks like an attractive option, It is important to note that this time development operator is defined in the standard basis, 0 = +z and 1 = z. These states are not eigenstates of Ŝ x, and the time development operator is really only of use if we can apply it to eigenstates. The eigenstates of Ŝ x are + x = 1 ( 0 + 1 and x = 1 ( 0 1. To express our time development we can apply it to basis states: Û(t 0 = e m tŝ x / h 0 = e m tŝ x / h ( +x + x / = 1 ( e m t +i +x +e m t x Expressing this again in the standard basis, (14 Û(t 0 = 1 ( e m t ( 0 + 1 + e +i m t ( 0 1 e+i m t + e = These coefficients should look familiar. Using Euler s relation: m t e+i m t e 0 m t 0 (15 Û(t 0 = cos eb o m t 0 i sin eb o t 0 (16 m We now want to apply this field for a time such that the coefficient on 0 is zero and the coefficient on 1 has magnitude 1. This first occurs when eb o t m = π, so we should apply the field for a time t = mπ eb o. You may be worried that this has taken our state to i 1 and not 1. This is no problem because one could always apply a field along the z-axis for a certain time (evolving φ and eliminate any relative phase. The important part of the gate is to get the timing/fields right for θ. It should be noted that this solution is hardly unique. An applied field in any direction transverse to ẑ for the same time would accomplish the goal, and resonance techniques would also work just fine. 4. An electron is shot with well-defined momentum at a -slit device. Does it get through to the detector? Consider the details below and explain your answer: In case you are worried about the different spatial trajectories the particles take, let s take a quick look at the full quantum state with the spatial dependence factored in: ψ electron = ψ spatial ψ spin C/CS/Phys 191, Spring 005 3

ψ electron (x = x ψ spatial ψ spin = ψ spatial (x ψ spin = e ikx ψ spin We further specify that ψ electron (x = 0 and ψ electron (x = x o = ψ path1 + ψ path, where: ψ path1 = e ikx o 0 ψ path = e ikx o e Ŝz h φ 0 Further, φ = eb o m t and t = x o v = x o hk. Assume that we are clever enough to experimentally engineer m φ = π. Answer: Naively, we might think nothing would happen because normally (i.e. classical vectors in spherical coordinates a π rotation brings you right back to where you started. However, this would be incorrect because we need to note the following: ψ > path = e Ŝz h π + h π 0 >= e h 0 >= eπ 0 > So psi > path = 0 >! Normally we ignore the - sign since it s an overall phase factor, but now we can t since the particle is going to interfere with itself!! So what happens at point B? psi > B = 0 > +( 0 > = 0 How many particles get through? ZERO!!! This is one of the strange features of quantum mechanics. For spin-1/ particles two complete rotations on the Bloch sphere are required to return to the initial state. 5. Consider the total spin of a system having electrons: Ŝ T = Ŝ 1 + Ŝ. Show that the entangled state ψ total = 0 1 1 1 1 0 has a net spin of zero. In other words, show that it is an eigenstate of Ŝ T with eigenvalue = 0. Answer: Use Ŝ T = ( Ŝ 1 + Ŝ = Ŝ 1 + Ŝ + Ŝ 1 Ŝ, and recall that Ŝ 1 Ŝ = Ŝ 1x Ŝ x + Ŝ 1y Ŝ y + Ŝ 1z Ŝ z. The raising and lowering operators are also very useful (Ŝ + = Ŝ x + iŝ y, Ŝ = Ŝ x iŝ y. We then have that: ((Ŝ1+ ŜT = Ŝ1 + Ŝ + Ŝ 1 (Ŝ+ + Ŝ (Ŝ1+ Ŝ 1 (Ŝ+ Ŝ + + +Ŝ 1z Ŝ z (17 i i A number of terms cancel out in this expansion, and some algebra gives the following expression: Ŝ T = Ŝ 1 + Ŝ + Ŝ 1z Ŝ z + Ŝ 1 Ŝ + + Ŝ 1+ Ŝ (18 Now let s apply this operator to the state ψ total = 0 1 1 1 1 0 : Ŝ T ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = ( Ŝ 1 + Ŝ + Ŝ 1z Ŝ z + Ŝ 1 Ŝ + + Ŝ 1+ Ŝ ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 (19 Let s look at the action of each of these terms on the state: Ŝ1 ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = 3 h 4 ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 Ŝ ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = 3 h 4 ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 Ŝ 1z Ŝ z ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = ( ( h h ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 Ŝ 1 Ŝ + ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = h ( 0 1 1 Ŝ 1+ Ŝ ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = h ( 1 1 0 (0 C/CS/Phys 191, Spring 005 4

Putting all of these together we get: ( 3 h ŜT ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = 4 + 3 h 4 h h ( 0 1 1 1 1 0 = 0( 0 1 1 1 1 0 So we see that the state is an eigenstate with an associated eigenvalue of zero. 6. Consider an atomic qubit system made from a single hydrogen atom. The qubit levels are the ground state and first excited state of hydrogen. 0 = ground state, E o 1 = first excited state, E 1 Suppose a laser at the resonant frequency ω = E 1 E o is directed at the atom with an intensity such that h 0 eeẑ 1 = 10 6 ev. How long should the laser be pointed at the atom to act as a Hadamard gate? Answer: Like problem 3, we want to construct a time-development operator that looks like a nice, useful quantum gate. In this case, we want the Hadamard gate: (1 H = 1 ( 1 1 1 1 ( For the case of atomic resonance (see lecture 15, we have that a state evolves as ψ(t = cos ω 1t 0 + e i(ωot+π sin ω 1t 1, with ω o = E 1 E o and ω h 1 = V 1 h. A Hadamard gate will take 0 1 ( 0 + 1, and by the fact that unitary transformations are one to one we can be assured that it will take 1 to 1 ( 0 1 modulo an overall phase factor. Further, we note that the ω o frequency is (a always present and (b too fast for us to control anyway, so the most important thing for this gate is to get equal amplitudes on 0 and 1. This is accomplished with the applied laser field. The time evolved ket ψ(t is half 0, half 1 when cos ω 1τ = sin ω 1τ. This occurs first when ω 1τ = π 4. Therefore τ = π. Plugging in the values, we obtain a time ω o = π h V o C/CS/Phys 191, Spring 005 5