Group of Experts on Geographical Names Sixteenth Session New York, June 1994

Similar documents
E/CONF.94/CRP.94. Report of the United States of America

Economic and Social Council

Current Status of the Standardization of Geographical Names in Cambodia

TOPONYMIC DATA FILES AND GAZETTEERS COUNTRY NAMES TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS EXONYMS STANDARDIZATION IN MULTILINGUAL AREAS

E/CONF.105/158/CRP.158

Estonian Place Names in the National Information System and the Place Names Register *

Report on the UNGEGN liaison with the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research *

Resolutions from the Tenth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names, 2012, New York*

Economic and Social Council

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL 13 July 2007

Report of the United Kingdom Division

Turkey National Report

Bengt Kjellson Chair of the Executive Committee UN-GGIM: Europe. 2 nd Joint UN-GGIM: Europe ESS Meeting 11 th March 2016, Luxembourg

2013 Cartographic Country Report Uruguay **

Economic and Social Council

RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT THE NINE UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES ON THE STANDARDIZATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES

RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT THE TEN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES ON THE STANDARDIZATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES

2018/1 The integration of statistical and geospatial information. The Regional Committee of UN-GGIM: Americas:

The purpose of this report is to recommend a Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy for the Town of Richmond Hill.

Geographical Names Activities in Africa The Gaborone Action Plan

Guidelines for the consistent use of place names in Australia

Key Elements of the Geographical Information System of Mexico *

* E/C ONF * "Prepared by the Directorate of Geodesy and Cartography, Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works.

Inventory of United Nations Resolutions on Cartography Coordination, Geographic Information and SDI 1

Economic and Social Council

E/CONF.105/75/CRP.75. Report of the Republic of Belarus

Toponymy workshop of Tunis: A road map to orient the activities of the national committee of toponymy

RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT THE ELEVEN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES ON THE STANDARDIZATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES

Economic and Social Council

Analysis of Regional Fundamental Datasets Questionnaire

Utilization and Provision of Geographical Name Information on the Basic Map of Japan*

World Meterological Organization Polar Space Task Group

Economic and Social Council

Taking GIS Retrospective to the Federal Level: Seminar Introduction

State GIS Officer/GIS Data

THE INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION AND ITS INVOLVEMENT WITH GEOGRAPHICAL PLACE NAMES

THE COLLECTION AND STANDARDIZATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES

A Joint European GIS Under Construction: The 1:5 Million International Geological Map of Europe and Adjacent Areas (IGME 5000)

PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS of OCEAN FEATURE NOMENCLATURE

ADMINISTRATION OF GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES IN URUGUAY

1) United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM)

Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Geospatial Technology and Innovation

UNITED NATIONS E/CONF.96/CRP. 5

8 th Arctic Regional Hydrographic Commission Meeting September 2018, Longyearbyen, Svalbard Norway

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Metadata Part 2: Extensions for imagery and gridded data

HOSTING AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE HISTORY OF CARTOGRAPHY: GUIDELINES,

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT ESTABLISHMENT OF A DATABASE OF EXPERTISE ON PEACEFUL USES OF CHEMISTRY

Nomination Form. Clearinghouse. New York State Office for Technology. Address: State Capitol-ESP, PO Box

Oakland County Parks and Recreation GIS Implementation Plan

REVIEW OF THE EMERGING ISSUES TASK FORCE

Economic and Social Council

Charter for the. Information Transfer and Services Architecture Focus Group

GIS TECHNICIAN I GIS TECHNICIAN II

Project EuroGeoNames (EGN) Results of the econtentplus-funded period *

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL 12 July 2007

National Cartographic Center

D.N.D. Hettiarachchi (Hetti) Survey Department, Sri Lanka.

British Standard 7666:2006 (parts 0, 1 and 2) its impact & use within local government

SPATIAL COVERAGE guidelines. Version number 1.0 April 2012

Toponymic guidelines of Poland for map editors and other users. Fourth revised edition. Submitted by Poland*

Second Administrative Level Boundaries (SALB) initiative & geographic names in cartography. Geospatial Information Section

Economic and Social Council

E/CONF.105/69/CRP.69. China s Campaign to Clean up and Standardize Non-standard Geographical Names

Country Report on SDI Activities in Singapore *

I l1l illll lllll l1111 * E/CONF.~I/I. E/CONF.~~/CRP.~ 26 November 1997 ENGLISH ORIGINAL: ENGLISH AND FRENCH

Economic and Social Council Distr. LIMITED

Report of Eastern Europe, Northern and Central Asia Division

A Current International Bibliography of the Literature of the History of Cartography on the WWW: of Whom, by Whom, and for Whom?

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Geographic information Spatial referencing by coordinates

Large Scale Mapping Policy for the Province of Nova Scotia

US National Spatial Data Infrastructure A Spatial Framework for Governance and Policy Development to Enable a Location-Based Digital Ecosystem

Economic and Social Council

FIRE DEPARMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

GIS ADMINISTRATOR / WEB DEVELOPER EVANSVILLE-VANDERBURGH COUNTY AREA PLAN COMMISSION

AS/NZS ISO :2015

Proposal to Include a Grid Referencing System in S-100

Training Course on Toponymy

Lecture 12. Data Standards and Quality & New Developments in GIS

Digital Mapping License Agreement

North Sea Ballast Water Exchange Area

A/AC.105/C.1/2016/CRP.17

CHAPTER 22 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

NOKIS - Information Infrastructure for the North and Baltic Sea

*O * _- C.727T 9. ** Prepared by the Geographical Names Section, Centre for Topographic Information, Natural Resources Canada

Summary of Global Mapping Forum 2003 in Okinawa and its Outcomes

Transmitted by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) on behalf of the informal correspondence group *

UNESCO Thematic Initiative. Astronomy and World Heritage

Future Proofing the Provision of Geoinformation: Emerging Technologies

David Lanter PhD GISP. Information Security Risks and Controls of Public Geospatial Datasets July 17, 2014

United Nations, UNGEGN, and support for national geographical names standardization programmes

Climate and Cryosphere Contributions for the Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP)

Use of the ISO Quality standards at the NMCAs Results from questionnaires taken in 2004 and 2011

Summary document for the catalogue of questions "Chemicals" Transmitted by the Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine

LIST OF DOCUMENTS* GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES. Twenty-seventh session 15 June 2016 New York, 28 April 2 May 2014

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

PART A Project summary

United Nations Group Of Experts On Geographical Names

Regional mechanisms for satellite data access and exchange: RA III/IV

Transcription:

Group of Experts on Geographical Names Sixteenth Session New York, 13-24 June 1994 Provisional Agenda Item 6 NAMES IN ANTARCTICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Submitted by Roger L. Payne, Executive Secretary U. S. Board on Geographic Names United States of America

NAMES IN ANTARCTICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By Roger L. Payne Executive Secretary U.S. Board on Geographic Names U.S. Geological Survey 1 523 National Center Reston, Virginia 22092 U.S.A. The United States has conducted programs to select names of features in Antarctica for cartographic-products since 1941. With the recreation of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names in 1947, it was found useful to continue those efforts through the Advisory Committee on Antarctic Names (ACAN), an auxiliary committee comprised of experts in fields of Antarctic science, cartography, and geography. This body has worked effectively to provide names for features in this area to support a variety of purposes, particularly scientific research and the production of maps. In 1988, an interim gazetteer of names in Antarctica was published by the United States to supplement the comprehensive gazetteer published in 1980, with approximately 1,000 officially approved additional names. This interim gazetteer provided names and geographical coordinates and included variant (unofficial) names as well. A new comprehensive gazetteer of Antarctica with more than 13,000 names, has been published (1994) in a similar format as the 1980 edition including name, geographical coordinates, physica description, and reason for naming. Variant (unofficial) names are alphabetically cross-referenced to the official name, and additionally, are also listed with the official name. All of the information in the newly published gazetteer is maintained in a digital file as part of the Geographic Names Information System of the United States and is readily accessible for analysis and export to various media. This digital file

will be available as a digital gazetteer (compact disk) later in 1994. The requisite software for searching, analyzing, and exporting information will be packaged as an integral part of the disk. Furthermore, the data will be enhanced. to include map sheet reference and year of recognition. by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. The United States continues to collaborate with other nations active in naming Antarctic features. At present, ACAN's most active collaborators are the British Antarctic Place Names Committee, the New Zealand Geographical Names Board and the Australian names authority. Naming in Antarctica, as in other places subject to exploration by several national research teams, often exhibits variations in nomenclature. For example, one nation may name a feature but never record it officially. Years later another nation may apply a different name; and additionally, a second nation may modify the original name by translation. It is possible that a third nation will find only the translated name and approve it. ACAN attempts to record all such names. Acting on the recommendation of ACAN, the U.S. Board will approve one, according to its principles and policies, but list others as variants. Approval of a geographical name by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names authorizes the name for official use by the United States Federal Government. The designation of a geographical name as a variant form or as an approved name is not intended to be either implicitly disparaging or prescriptive for other nations. The basic goal of the Board is to provide standardized names that English-language users may readily understand. To achieve this goal, ACAN applies a set of rules and procedures for approving names in Antarctica. Decisions on names are based -2 -

upon priority of application, appropriateness, and the extent to which usage has become established. Names of physical features tire generally grouped into ffrst, second, and third order divisions according to the geographical extent or historical significkce of the feature. Commemorative, geographical names are assigned based upon a published scheme relating the order of feature to leve'l of individual contribution. Non-personal commemorative names, such as for events,. ships, and organizations as well as descriptive names may be applied to any order of magnitude with which there is feature association. Generally, based upon trends of use, favorable consideration is given by ACAN to names displaying brevity, simplicity, and lack of ambiguity. Therefore, the full name and/or title of individuals is not considered appropriate. Non-personal names that are unduly long will be shortened into some meaningful form. English generics are preferred, and translated names will be avofded, although.wellestablished translated forms may be considered. An English generic may be substituted or added for a foreign generic term in, the case of non-personal, rron- English, single word names th-at include a generic or definite article. Finally, romaniration systems approved the by U.S. Board on Geographic Names are used to transliterate names from non-roman writing, systems. These systems and polkies have proven to be extremely relevant and useful fn standardiring the geographical nomenclature of AntarctIca. As a member of the Scientific Commi-ttee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), the United States Is involved in many programs affecting that continent. At a meeting of SCAR in June of 1992, the United States agreed to support a new SCAR activfty to develop a central repository of Antarctic names publications. The United States

believes the publication of a compendium of approved names would be valuable, but it does not endorse any plan to create an international authority to select or approve names, at least until such a plan is formulated, analyzed, and approved by all interested parties. In addition, all nations with'established naming programs' for Antarctica must be invited to participate in such an activity. ACAN recommends that nations engaged in namsng features in Antarctica fully exchange reports of their activities and also suggests that nations follow comparable principles, policies, and procedures for naming features. -4-