Amplified Geochemical Imaging, LLC SUMMARY REPORT

Similar documents
Application of an Analytical Technique for Determining Alkyl PAHs, Saturated Hydrocarbons and Geochemical Biomarkers

Analysis of Alkyl PAHs And Geochemical Biomarkers

REPORT ON GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF PISTON CORED SAMPLES, OFFSHORE NOVA SCOTIA. M. Fowler and J. Webb, APT Canada

Automated Characterization of Compounds in Fire Debris Samples

Analysis of Biomarkers in Crude Oil Using the Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF

Peng-Robinson Equation of State Predictions for Gas Condensate Before and After Lumping

Unusual oils from Scandinavia

HYDRO. Norsk Hydro a.s Bergen. Research Centre documentation. Exploration and Production

Gore Amplified Geochemical Imaging SM -

From Satellite Images to Reservoired Hydrocarbons: The In-Depth Investigations of the Marco Polo Seeps, Green Canyon, Gulf of Mexico*

PROGRAM commissioned report are not

Application Note 059 Direct Desorption of Car Trim Materials for VOC and SVOC Analysis in Accordance with VDA Method 278

Petroleum Systems of the San Joaquin Basin: Characterization of Oil and Gas Types

Petroleum Systems and Mixed Oil in the Barents Sea and Northern Timan-Pechora Basin, Russia*

Approaches to quantify the effect of extracted plant material on PHC levels.

D DAVID PUBLISHING. 1. Introduction. Joshua Lukaye 1, Godfrey Etano 1 and Geoffrey Abbott 2

Atlantic RBCA. Guidelines for Laboratories. Tier I and Tier II Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methods

36. PRELIMINARY ORGANIC GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF THE SITE 217 CORE SAMPLES IN THE BENGAL BASIN, DSDP LEG 22 1

Site Specific Conditional Sampler Garfield County, Colorado. VOC Data Summaries. Prepared for

CCME Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Tier 1 Method

Geological Controls on Petroleum Fluid Property Heterogeneities in Carbonate Bitumen and Heavy Oil Reservoirs from Northern Alberta

Geochemistry of Dew Point Petroleum Systems, Browse Basin, Australia

w 2-w 3 (gm) w 3 (gm) (gm) 1 bee wax (nor) bee wax (h &c)

14. ORIGIN OF ASPHALT AND ADJACENT OIL STAINS IN LOWER CRETACEOUS FRACTURED LIMESTONES, DEEP SEA DRILLING PROJECT LEG 77 1

GC-MS. Commonly done on low resolution (1 dalton) quadrupole instruments in the selected ion (mass) mode. e.g. Hewlett-Packard MSD, VG Trio and

Chapter 2 Alkanes and Cycloalkanes: Introduction to Hydrocarbons

HYDRO E&P Division REPORT

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON THE HEI WEB SITE

Chemistry Gas Chromatography: Separation of Volatile Organics

Geochemistry Data Report - Oils and Gas Analyses Well 16/2-4

Water Injections in GC - Does Water Cause Bleed?

TRACKING OIL SPILLS IOANA G. PETRISOR OUR COAST TO KEEP: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SEMINAR

Liquid-liquid Equilibrium Extraction of Aromatic Compounds from Model Hydrocarbon Mixtures for Separation of Cracked Oils

Industrial Applications with a New Polyethylene Glycol-Based GC Column

Introduction to Alkanes

Analysis of Sulfur-Containing Flavor Compounds By GC/MS With A PFPD

is given for the isotopic fingerprinting methodology.

Thermochemical Properties of Jet Fuels. Rui Xu, Hai Wang, Med Colket, Tim Edwards. July 6, 2015

DiatoSorb-W Diatomaceous Earth: Great Chromatography Millions of Years in the Making

Standard Operating Procedure for Performing a QA Review of an Aldehyde Data Batch

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

DiatoSorb-W Diatomaceous Earth: Great Chromatography Millions of Years in the Making

GEOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF OILS AND SOURCE ROCKS AND OIL-SOURCE ROCK CORRELATIONS, SUB-ANDEAN BASINS, PERU

ANALYTICAL METHOD DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ALDEHYDES IN AMBIENT AIR Page 1 of 11 Air sampling and analysis

A GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC/MA SS SPE CTROMETRIC DETERMINATION OF SOME ORGANIC COMPOUNDS OF TWO NORWEGIAN ROCKS

7.1 PROTOCOL FOR SEDIMENT MONITORING FOR NUTRIENTS, METALS AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Substance identification and naming convention for hydrocarbon solvents

Improved and standardized methodology for oil spill fingerprinting

Initial Investigation of Petroleum Systems of the Permian Basin, USA. Acknowledgements

Applications of biological markers in assessing the organic richness of the surface sediments of Suez Gulf, Egypt

Determination of the Boiling-Point Distribution by Simulated Distillation from n-pentane through n-tetratetracontane in 70 to 80 Seconds

Hydrocarbon generation potential of the coals and shales around the Eucalyptus Campsite area, Maliau Basin, Sabah

Molecular Organic Geochemistry of Crude Oil from Shushan and Abu Gharadig Basins, Western Desert, Egypt

Nomenclature Problems Guidelines and summary page on last two pages.

Detailed Characterization and Profiles of Crankcase and Diesel Particulate Matter Exhaust Emissions Using Speciated Organics

Investigating Source, Age, Maturity, and Alteration Characteristics of Oil Reservoirs Using APGC/MS/MS Analysis of Petroleum Biomarkers

Determination of Normal Hydrocarbons C 5 -C 18 Using Silanized Algerian Bentonite (B 1100 ) as Support in Gas Chromatographic Analysis

Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department. Experiment 03: Work and Energy

Ultra-Inert chemistry for Trace Level Analysis

Analysis of Extractable and Leachable (E&L) Compounds Using a Low-Energy EI-Capable High Resolution Accurate Mass GC/Q-TOF

ApplicationNOTE Abstract

Making Sense of Differences in LCMS Data: Integrated Tools

22X Builder s Transit Level Model No Instruction Manual

Amplified Geochemical SURVEY for Petroleum Exploration DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE

Intertek Environmental VOC Emissions

ohio1/yje-yje/yje-yje/yje99907/yje2642d07z xppws 23:ver.3 12/28/07 7:47 Msc: je TEID: brf00 BATID: je2a36

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Source Rock and Depositional Environment Study of Three Hydrocarbon Fields in Prinos Kavala Basin (North Aegean)

Date 10/22/97 Page 1 Revision 4.1 OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY METHODS 8000/8100 (MODIFIED) DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)

VOC EMISSION TEST REPORT BREEAM NOR

Page: 9. Table: 3. Figure: 9

EGASUS. 4D GCxGC TOFMS. Delivering the Right Results

Maritime Safety Services. Supporting Safe and Efficient Transfer Operations

ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE FOR ROMET ROTARY METER BODIES AND/OR MECHANICAL NON-CONVERTING AND CONVERTING MODULES

OBJECTIVE DATA PACKAGE DELIVERABLES

VOC TEST REPORT M1. 6 April Regulation or protocol Conclusion Version of regulation or protocol

Heavy Oil Reservoir Characterization using Integrated Geochemical and Geophysical Techniques

Careful, Cyclones Can Blow You Away!

Determination of Hydrocarbon Components in Petroleum Naphthas

Test Report ROMA USA LLC. Product Emissions of Furniture in accordance with. Cradle to Cradle section 5.8 ECODOMUS SATIN BASE TR.

WADA Technical Document TD2003IDCR

22X Builder s Level Model No Instruction Manual

Hydrocarbon and Hydrographic Data from Southern Hecate Strait: Water and Sediment Samples Collected in September, 2003

A geochemical overview of some Gippsland Basin hydrocarbon accumulations

New Approaches to the Development of GC/MS Selected Ion Monitoring Acquisition and Quantitation Methods Technique/Technology

Breath Analysis Investigating the Human Volatome by ATD-GCMS

Alkanes and Cycloalkanes

Hurricane Matthew Threats and Impacts Briefing for Eastern NC

Atmospheric Environment

VOC TEST REPORT M1. 16 August Regulation or protocol Conclusion Version of regulation or protocol

Technical Procedure for Solid Phase Extraction of THC and THC-COOH for GC-MS Analysis

VOC TEST REPORT AgBB

Supporting Information Pure Substance and. Mixture Viscosities Based on Entropy-Scaling. and an Analytic Equation of State

Optimizing Conditions for Volatiles Analysis

Test Report. Muovihaka Oy. Product Emissions in accordance with the Swedish Building Material Assessment Ultima graphite.

COLA Mass Spec Criteria

JMRS11 Jan Mayen Ridge Sampling Survey 2011

Depositional Environment and Source Potential of Devonian Source Rock, Ghadames Basin, Southern Tunisia

Transcription:

Amplified Geochemical Imaging, LLC SUMMARY REPORT Applied Petroleum Technology Canada, Ltd. Slick Samples Geochemical Evaluation Order No. 01410.2 9 th September 2016 Prepared For: Applied Petroleum Technology Canada, Ltd. 700-1816 Crowchild Trail, NW Calgary, Alberta T2M 3Y7 Canada

Table of Contents Title Page Introduction 1 Field Conditions 2 Sample Analysis 2 Results and Discussion 2 Conclusions 6 Figure 1 Location Map showing the sample locations 1 Figure 2 Graph of normal alkane response for each sample 3 Figure 3 Total Ion Chromatograms for each sample 4 Figure 4 Ternary plot of Sterane isomers 5 APPENDIX A: Field Documentation APPENDIX B: Digital Data and Total Ion Chromatograms APPENDIX C: Description of Service APPENDIX D: Suggested Instructions for use of AGI Slick Samplers APPENDIX E: List of Compounds APPENDIX F: Reference

Introduction Applied Petroleum Technology of Canada (APTEC) has collected four (4) surface slick samples using the AGI Slick kit and slick samples in the Canadian waters offshore Nova Scotia. A brief description of the AGI slick sampling applications and advantages is attached within Appendix C. The samples were collected from a vessel, and the location of the samples is shown on Figure 1. Samples were then returned to the AGI laboratory in Newark, DE for subsequent analysis. Appendix A shows the field log provided by APTEC for the samples returned as part of this program. This summary report will document the field sampling as well as the analytical procedures that were used to evaluate the samples. Preliminary conclusions are presented along with the actual mass data table providing some context and comparison between the available samples. Figure 1: Location Map showing the sample locations. Background image courtesy of Google Earth. 1 of 6

Field Conditions Although no vessel information or date/time of sample collection was noted on the field log, it is worth pointing out that the following comments were noted at each of these locations: Sample 2B: calm conds, large sparse bubbles, sampling during coring, prob pollen Sample 34: 1-2m swell, minor cresting, mud on outside core barrel had oily appearance, taken during coring Sample 39: calm seas, no swell, taken during core retrieval Sample 50: calm seas, oil sheen during core retrieval Sample Analysis The samples arrived at the AGI laboratory on July 11, 2016 in satisfactory condition. These were then scanned as part of the AGI LIM (laboratory information management) system, and prepared for analysis. The analytical process for each sample involves thermal desorption followed by gas chromatographic separation and mass selective detection (GC/MS), in two operating modes. One mode allows for the quantitation of compounds using reference standards, and the other qualifies biomarker compounds based on a reference oil. This combined method has been developed specifically for the AGI Slick sampler. Analytical QA/QC includes analysis of method and instrument blanks as well. The complete compound list is shown in Appendix E, and the data are included in Appendix B. The data were analyzed and processed without any significant issues, and the data quality passes all QA/QC measures established for this methodology. Results and Discussion The data developed from these samples is available digitally under Appendix B. Data have been processed in order to evaluate any indications of petroleum source and maturity. Figure 2 shows a graphic chart of each sample in terms of the n-alkane response, and this figure includes the compounds pristane and phytane. This response is low to moderate in our experience, and may indicate a weathered petroleum source. The total ion chromatogram for each of the four samples is shown in Figure 3, and this also suggests a weathered petroleum source as evidenced by the unresolved complex mixture (UCM or hump) between approximately 7 and 20 minutes, which is particularly noticeable in sample 50; see the red rectangle on Figure 3. This is also present in samples 39 and 34 to a lesser extent. The relatively smooth surface of this hump suggests a highly weathered sample. However, there may also be an earlier UCM, particularly in sample 39, which elutes between 4 and 6 minutes approximately; see the blue rectangle on Figure 3. The peaks within this window appear to reflect a more fresh sample that is not as weathered as the late-eluting peak. 2 of 6

The biomarker analysis indicates that sample 2016011-50 contains a relative abundance of biomarkers at levels that are above our detection limit. Consequently, these data can be used to provide evidence of the source origin and maturity. Figure 4 (as an example) shows a ternary plot of the distribution of sterane isomers, which suggests that this is likely to be derived from an open marine source comparable to the Hekkingen Formation (Upper Jurassic age) of the Norwegian Barents Sea. Figure 2: Normal alkane compounds (plus pristane and phytane). 3 of 6

Figure 3: Total Ion Chromatograms for each of the samples. These charts are also included in Appendix B. 4 of 6

Figure 4: Modified from Shanmugam (1985), the distribution of sterane isomers shows that the slick sample is consistent with an open marine source, which is also represented by the NSO-1 oil from the Hekkingen Formation of the Upper Jurassic age in the Norwegian Barents Sea. 5 of 6

Conclusions The results of initial testing the slick samples that were obtained as part of this study appear to reflect a highly weathered petroleum source, and the volume of mass from that analysis appeared to be sufficient to further evaluate the samples for biomarkers. The biomarker data from 3 of the samples was insufficient to allow any processing. However the biomarker data from one sample (711441 Field ID 50) was sufficiently above the noise level, and can provide insight into the possible age and origin of the source material. The sterane ternary plot derived from the biomarkers suggests an open marine source. Questions regarding this report, or any of the data processing techniques used by AGI in the evaluation of its geochemical data, may be directed to the author of this report at the following address: Amplified Geochemical Imaging, LLC 210 Executive Drive, Suite 1 Newark, DE 19702 Phone: +1-302-266-2428 Comments and discussion regarding this geochemical service are welcome and encouraged. 6 of 6

APPENDIX A Field Documentation Name Lat Long Water Depth (m) Sample Type Reasons/Notes calm conds, large sparse bubbles, samplng during 2016011-2B 41⁰43.77858 64⁰46.93586 2533 Slick coring, prob pollen 1-2m swell, minor cresting, mud on outside core 2016011-034 42⁰19.8797 61⁰33.7894 3220 Slick barrel had oily appearance, taken during coring 2016011-039 42⁰52.1792 60⁰50.3057 2256 Slick 2016011-050 42⁰09.9726 62⁰21.1720 2721 Slick calm seas, no swell, taken during core retrieval calm seas, oil sheen during core retrieval

APPENDIX B Digital Data Data Table for APTEC.xlsx Total Ion Chromatograms TIC-1410-2-scan.pdf TIC-1410-2-SIM.pdf

APPENDIX C Description of Service The AGI Slick Sampling service is an advanced and unique surface geochemical prospecting tool capable of directly detecting and quantifying many petroleum related organic compounds in the range of C6 (hexane) to C35 (pentatriacontane) and well as the higher molecular weight biomarkers and related compounds. When properly utilized, the AGI Slick sampling service can help to locate and characterize/ differentiate thermogenic hydrocarbons found at the sea surface, and provide the basis for determining the possible source of these hydrocarbons. The combined use of AGI low molecular weight (LMW) biomarker analysis, biomarker analysis (stable isotope ratio determination) and interpretation provides a powerful exploration tool. These techniques in conjunction with other conventional techniques such as basin modeling within the geological framework can greatly assist in exploration as well as mature E&P activities. Quality Control As part of the normal quality control measures for this methodology, AGI will process blank samples (method blanks and instrument blanks) along with standards in order to evaluate the instrument precision and reproducibility. Method and Instrument blanks establish the background level of noise for each analytical run, and may be used to blank-subtract the mass levels detected on the field samples. Instrument tuning is accomplished daily by using standard injections of 1-bromo-4-fluorobenzene (BFB). Biomarker Analysis involved standard preparations of the North Sea Oil-1 (provided as an industry standard oil by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate), which are used to establish performance criteria for the AGI instruments. The response factors for each of the standards processed with the field samples are compared visually against the analytical method standard response in order to identify the biomarker compounds. Any positive detections are quantified based on the standard response, and are reported in terms of peak area. Aliphatic response (normal alkanes between C6 and C35 plus isoprenoids pristane and phytane) is calibrated using a response factor, which is generated from the average response of standards included in each analytical run. Each compound is reported in terms of nanograms of mass (ng) from each sample.

APPENDIX D Suggested Instructions for use of the AGI Slick Sampler Data recording Once you have spotted a slick or area for sampling, log information on a field log, including: Latitude & Longitude by GPS Date and time Surface weather conditions (wind, speed, direction, wave heights) Physical description of the slick including the presence of bubbles rising and breaking the surface. Digital photo of slick if possible Serial number of the slick sampler used Fishing rod Using the portable fishing rod that comes with each kit, simply fold up the white rod tip and secure the sampler as described below. Attaching sampler to fishing line Put on a new, clean pair of nitrile gloves (provided with kit). Remove the sampler from the jar. Do not touch the unprotected functional tail with your bare hands or any other materials. Tie the light weight fishing line through the loop or make a loop in the line and pass it through the sampler loop and over the end of the sampler for attachment. Now the sampler will be on the terminal end of the line. Attach a neutrally buoyant bobber/weight to the fishing line about 2 feet (50-60 cm) from the sampler (between the sampler and the casting rod). Press each end of the bobber to expose spring-loaded hooks, catch the line and release to secure. Casting and Sampling The boat s bow wave can push the slick away from the boat, so it is best to cut speed and coast near or to the side of the slick from the downwind side. Cast the sampler onto the slick. Reel in the sampler very slowly allowing at least two minutes for it to contact the slick. Place the sampler into the jar and cut it from the fishing line. Cap the jar tightly being careful not to catch the sampler under the threads of the cap. Place back in box for shipment back to AGI. Consider sampling multiple spots in a slick, particularly if the slick has a heterogeneous appearance; i.e., gray sheen, rainbow sheen or blobs that look like lily pads. In a general sampler area or excursion, some people will sample an area void of slicks to create a background blank used to compare with the slick results. Decontamination Cut off and discard neutrally buoyant bobber/weight and fishing line that may have contacted the slick. Throw away used nitrile gloves. Returning used samplers When preparing your customs paperwork, be sure to use the same description contained on the customs paperwork used by AGI for shipping to you. DO NOT describe as oil samples. They may be shipped at ambient temperatures but don t allow prolonged exposure to the sun, which could degrade the sample. Please notify AGI of shipment details.

APPENDIX E List of Compounds The following list of compounds are quantified in mass units (ng) using standards introduced during the analysis. All standards analyzed during the sequence contain all of the compounds listed below. Normal Alkanes Isoprenoids Hexane C 6 Heneiconsane C 21 Pristane C 19 Heptane C 7 Docosane C 22 Phytane C 20 Octane C 8 Tricosane C 23 Nonane C 9 Tetracosane C 24 Decane C 10 Pentacosane C 25 Undecane C 11 Hexacosane C 26 Dodecane C 12 Heptacosane C 27 Tridecane C 13 Octacosane C 28 Tetradecane C 14 Nonacosane C 29 Pentadecane C 15 Triacontane C 30 Hexadecane C 16 Hentriacontane C 31 Heptadecane C 17 Dotriacontane C 32 Octadecane C 18 Tritriacontane C 33 Nonadecane C 19 Tetratriacontane C 34 Eicosane C 20 Pentatriacontane C 35

The following biomarkers are qualified using the NSO-1 standard for positive identification. These compounds are reported in area count units based on the retention time of these compounds in the NSO-1 standard. Report Row Compound Name Code Fragment 1 C 23 H 42 tricyclic terpane 23/3 191 area 2 C 24 H 44 tricyclic terpane 24/3 191 area 3 C 25 H 46 tricyclic terpane 25/3 191 area 4 C 24 H 42 tetracyclic terpane 24/4 191 area 5 18α(H)-22,29,30-trisnorneohopane 27Ts 191 area 6 17α(H)-22,29,30-trisnorhopane 27Tm 191 area 7 17α(H), 21β(H)-28,30-bisnorhopane 28ab 191 area 8 17α(H), 21β(H)-25-norhopane 25nor30ab 191 area 9 17α(H), 21β(H)-30-norhopane 29ab 191 area 10 18α(H)-30-norneohopane 29Ts 191 area 11 15α-methyl-17α(H)-27-norhopane (diahopane) 30d 191 area 12 17β(H), 21α(H)-30-norhopane (normoretane) 29ba 191 area 13 17α(H), 21β(H)-hopane 30ab 191 area 14 17β(H), 21α(H)-hopane (moretane) 30ba 191 area 15 Gammacerane 30G 191 area 16 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(S)-homohopane 31abS 191 area 17 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(R)-homohopane 31abR 191 area 18 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(S)-bishomohopane 32abS 191 area 19 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(R)-bishomohopane 32abR 191 area 20 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(S)-trishomohopane 33abS 191 area 21 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(R)-trishomohopane 33abR 191 area 22 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(S)-tetrakishomohopane 34abS 191 area 23 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(R)-tetrakishomohopane 34abR 191 area 24 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(S)-pentakishomohopane 35abS 191 area 25 17α(H), 21β(H), 22(R)-pentakishomohopane 35abR 191 area 26 17α(H), 21β(H)-25,28,30-trisnorhopane 25nor28ab 177 area 27 17α(H), 21β(H)-25,30-bisnorhopane 25nor29ab 177 area 28 17α(H), 21β(H)-25-norhopane 25nor30ab 177 area 29 13β(H), 17α(H), 20(S)-cholestane (diasterane) 27dbS 217 area 30 13β(H), 17α(H), 20(R)-cholestane (diasterane) 27dbR 217 area 31 5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H), 20(S)-cholestane 27aaS 217 area 32 5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H), 20(R)-cholestane 27aaR 217 area 33 24-ethyl-13β(H), 17α(H), 20(S)-cholestane (diasterane) 29dbS 217 area 34 24-ethyl-13β(H), 17α(H), 20(R)-cholestane (diasterane) 29dbR 217 area Continued on next page - North Sea Oil-1 sample obtained with Norwegian Institute Guide to Organic Geochemical Analyses (NIGOGA). *-Based on NIGOGA

Report Row Compound Name Code Fragment 35 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H), 20(S)-cholestane 29aaS 217 area 36 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(R)-cholestane 29bbR 217 area 37 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(S)-cholestane 29bbS 217 area 38 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14α(H), 17α(H), 20(R)-cholestane 29aaR 217 area 39 5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(R)-cholestane 27bbR 218 area 40 5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(S)-cholestane 27bbS 218 area 41 24-methyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(R)-cholestane 28bbR 218 area 42 24-methyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(S)-cholestane 28bbS 218 area 43 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(R)-cholestane 29bbR 218 area 44 24-ethyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(S)-cholestane 29bbS 218 area 45 24-propyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(R)-cholestane 30bbR 218 area 46 24-propyl-5α(H), 14β(H), 17β(H), 20(S)-cholestane 30bbS 218 area 47 Phenanthrene Phen 178 area 48 3-Methylphenanthrene 3mPhen 192 area 49 2-Methylphenanthrene 2mPhen 192 area 50 9-Methylphenanthrene 9mPhen 192 area 51 1-Methylphenanthrene 1mPhen 192 area 52 C 21 MA A1 253 area 53 C 22 MA B1 253 area 54 β(s)c 27 MA & β(s)c 27 DMA C1 253 area 55 β(r)c 27 DMA & β(r)c 27 MA & α(s)c 27 MA D1 253 area 56 β(s)c 28 MA & α(r)c 27 DMA & β(s)c 28 DMA E1 253 area 57 α(s)c 27 DMA F1 253 area 58 α(r)c 27 MA & α(s)c 28 MA & β(r)c 28 MA & β(r)c 28 DMA & β(s)c 29 MA & β(s)c 29 DMA G1 253 area 59 α(s)c 29 MA & α(r)c 28 MA & β(r)c 29 MA & β(r)c 29 DMA H1 253 area 60 α(r)c 29 MA I1 253 area 61 C 20 TA a1 231 area 62 C 21 TA b1 231 area 63 (S)C 26 TA c1 231 area 64 (R)C 26 TA & (S)C 27 TA d1 231 area 65 (S)C 28 TA e1 231 area 66 (R)C 27 TA f1 231 area 67 (R)C 28 TA g1 231 area MA = Monoaromatic Steroid DMA = Dia monoaromatic Steroid TA = Triaromatic Steroid

APPENDIX F References Shanmugam, G., 1985, Significance of coniferous rain forests and related organic matter in generating commercial quantities of oil, Gippsland Basin, Australia: AAPG Bulletin, v. 69, p. 1241-1254