Introducing New Functionalities in Liquid Stationary Phases in GC Columns for Confirming Organic Volatile Impurity Testing in Pharmaceutical Products.

Similar documents
A Generic Method for the Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using Static Headspace-GC-FID/MS

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

USP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument

The Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using the Agilent G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Simultaneous dual capillary column headspace GC with flame ionization confirmation and quantification according to USP <467> Application Note

Residual solvents analysis using an Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC system

The determination of residual solvents in pharmaceuticals using the Agilent G1888 headspace/6890n GC/5975 inert MSD system Application Note

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

Analyzing Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC Headspace with Valve-and-Loop Sampling

Fast Analysis of USP 467 Residual Solvents using the Agilent 7890A GC and Low Thermal Mass (LTM) System

Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

USP<467> residual solvents

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Product Brief. - Hydrocarbons alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, dienes including natural gas, refinery gas, liquified petroleum gas

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

High Purity Chromasolv Solvents

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Target Compound Results Summary

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Applying the Agilent 5977A MSD to the Analysis of USP<467> Residual Solvents with the 7697A Headspace Sampler and 7890B GC

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

Spectroscopy in Inorganic Chemistry. Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Routine-grade performance of a new static headspace autosampler for the analysis of residual solvents according to USP <467> method

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

An Advanced Base Deactivated Capillary Column for analysis of Volatile amines Ammonia and Alcohols.

Optimizing Standard Preparation

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

A Capillary Gas Chromatographic Procedure for the Analysis of Nine Common Residual Solvents in Water-Insoluble Bulk Pharmaceuticals

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Supelco Ionic Liquid GC Columns Introduction to the Technology

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Selection of a Capillary

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

Column Dimensions. GC Columns and Consumables. Mark Sinnott Application Engineer. March 12, 2010

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Water Injections in GC - Does Water Cause Bleed?

AUTOMATED HEADSPACE. Headspace Principles. Graham Broadway. Headspace Gas Chromatography Background to the HS Technique

Understanding the Capillary GC Column: How to Choose the Correct Type and Dimension

Selection of a Capillary GC Column

Optimizing GPC Separations

Accepted for publication in Analytical Chemistry, August, 2011 SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR. address:

Secrets of GC Column Dimensions

How To Select the Correct GC Column. Simon Jones Application Engineer

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

Static Headspace Blood Alcohol Analysis with the G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

McCAMPBELL ANALYTICAL INC Willow Pass Road Pittsburg CA

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

CHEM340 Tutorial 4: Chromatography

SUPELCO. Improved Performance for Cyanopropylphenyldimethylpolysiloxane (SPB-1701, SPB-1301) Capillary Columns

LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN Safe handling & Recovery OF Solvents in Pharma Industry

Fast, Quantitative Analysis of Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ

Improve lives IT S ABOUT IMPROVING PEOPLE S LIVES IT S ABOUT INTENT

Capillary GC Column Selection and Method Development A Primer on Column Parameters and Instrument Conditions

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

ACETONE. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION CAS NO EINECS NO MOL WT H.S. CODE Oral rat LD50: 5800 mg/kg

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

The Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC-VUV and Static Headspace

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Rxi -624Sil MS The "Go To" GC Column for Fast, Effective Volatile Impurities Method Development

Introduction and Principles of Gas Chromatography

Simultaneous Estimation of Residual Solvents (Isopropyl Alcohol and Dichloromethane) in Dosage Form by GC-HS-FID

Transcription:

Introducing New Functionalities in Liquid Stationary Phases in GC Columns for Confirming Organic Volatile Impurity Testing in Pharmaceutical Products. CHRISTOPHER M. ENGLISH, CHRISTOPHER S. COX, FRANK L. DORMAN, & DINESH PATWARDHAN.

Abstract One of the most common GC testing methods used by today s pharmaceutical laboratories is the analysis of organic volatile impurities (OVIs( OVIs) ) in finished pharmaceutical products. There are many challenges in performing OVI analyses. The most commonly used capillary GC stationary phases for OVI analysis of regulated solvents are the G27 (5% diphenyl/95% /95%dimethyl polysiloxane) ) and G43 (6%cyanopropyl phenyl/94%dimethyl polysiloxane) columns. However, other stationary phases must be employed depending on the specific solvents used in the manufacturing process of a pharmaceutical compound.

Often the OVIs are low-boiling, low molecular weight compounds that are difficult to retain and resolve on capillary stationary phases. Thick stationary films (3.0µm and 5.0µm) often are used to achieve required separations at a sacrifice in analysis time and the inability to use high GC operating temperatures. Restek is developing a new stationary phase for confirming OVIs,, that will resolve coeluting unregulated compounds from regulated solvents.

Retention time information on seventy-six six of the most common solvents will be presented on three stationary phases. Chromatograms of these common solvents will be presented to show the utility of these phases for the OVI analysis. This data will also be used to design a new column that will attempt to resolve all 76 compounds.

Background Residual solvents in pharmaceuticals are defined as volatile organic chemicals that are used or produced in the manufacture of drug substances or excipients, or in the preparation of drug products. The solvents are not completely removed by practical manufacturing techniques. Since there is no known therapeutic benefit from residual solvents, all residual solvents should be removed to the extent possible to meet product specifications, good manufacturing practices or other quality based requirements.

USP Compound Classes These solvents can be characterized by toxicity in three classes as follows: Class I have unacceptable toxicities and should be avoided. Class II less severe, should be avoided if possible. Class III less toxic and should be used when possible. Solvents not classified, or isomers of analytes listed above.

USP Changes Address Challenging Separations USP made changes in 1997 to overcome the difficulties resulting from unregulated solvents coeluting with regulated solvents and thereby causing over-representation representation of their concentration. These changes allow FID methods, GC/MS or a second validated column to be used. Restek is currently developing a new stationary phase, which is designed to be a confirmation column to phases such as G43 & G27.

Analysis of Common Solvents Using Two Columns The following conditions apply to both chromatograms shown (Rtx( Rtx-G27 & Rtx-VGC), the only deviation from these parameters is the film thickness of the Rtx-VGC, which is 3.0 microns. The chromatograms are Headspace injections of 24 common residual solvents for pharmaceutical processing. Prepared to equal about 500ppm in the bulk pharmaceutical. The Rtx- VGC would make a suitable confirmation column to the G27 phase for this compound set, but a column specifically engineered for these compounds could be used for a variety of methods and provide better

USP <467> Common solvents Method I: G27 30m x 0.53mm x 5.0 df, w/ 5m PM guard Inj: Headspace at 500ppm in bulk pharm.. 2:1 split 5 Oven Temp: : 35(10)5/100 (0) 25/240(5) Detector: FID, 260 C, 1 x 10-11 AFS Carrier: helium, 4.1psi const, 35cm/sec @ 35 C samples shaken and heated at 90 C for 15 minutes, 1mL headspace injection.

Rtx -G27 USP <467> Common Solvents 1,1,1-TCA chlorofor m ethyl ace MEK / C-6 benzene/c-tet/n-butanol 1,2-DCA toluene n-propanol methylene chloride 1,1-dichloroethene diethyl ether acetonitrile/ aceteone/ isopropanol ethanol ethylene oxide methanol THF 1,4-dioxane C7 TCE pyridine 20 minutes

Rtx -VGC USP <467> Common Solvents acetone / hexane 2-propanol methylene chloride MEK benzene/c7 5 1,2-DCA toluene 1,1-dichloroethene diethyl ether ethylene oxide methanol e.ace/111tca/ THF carbon tet. chloroform 1,4-dioxane 1-butanol TCE 1-propanol acetonitrile 2 4 6 8 pyridine 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Time-->

Chromatograms of the 76 Solvents Using the Rtx-1, Rtx-200 and an Experimental Fluorinated Polymer. The three chromatograms are run under the exact same conditions. These analytes can be modeled allowing predictions of retention time under any set of conditions, such as, column diameter, column length, film thickness, temperature, detector considerations, injection techniques, and flow. This allows subsets of the compound list to be resolved using specific conditions. Contact Restek for more information.

Stationary Phases Used for Modeling Dimethyl-polysiloxane Rtx-1

Rtx-1 OVI methods allow for GC/MS confirmational analysis to identify complex chromatograms. GC/MS compound identification errors are common since ketones & acetates share parent ions (43). Alkanes & alkenes also present challenges since these compounds contain the 57 ion. The chromatogram shown illustrates the problems with non-polar phase with this compound list. Polar compound such as ethylene glycol have poor solubility in the dimethyl- polysiloxane phase resulting in poor sensitivity & linearity. The alcohols are retained less relative to the non-polar analytes.

USP Solvents Rtx -1 GC_EV00463 Rtx -1 60m, 0.53mm, 3.00µm (cat.# 10188) Sample: solvents Conc.: solventless mixture ~1.3% each* Sample size: needle vapor Inj.: split, 250 C Septa purge: 5mL/min. Split vent flow: 100mL/min. ~1:13 split Carrier: helium Head pressure: 11.0psi constant pressure Linear velocity: 45.6 cm/sec @ 35 C Det: Mass Selective Scan range: 10amu to 260amu MS interface: open split interface ~1:7 split Oven temp.: 35 C (hold 4 min.) to 250 C @ 4 /min. 1. formaldehyde 2. water 3. chloromethane 4. methanol 5. acetaldehyde 6. ethylene oxide 7. chloroethane 8. ethanol 9. acetonitrile 10. acetone 11. 2-propanol 12. 2-chloropropane 13. diethylether 14. pentane 15. ethyl formate 16. formic acid 17. methylal 18. 1,1-dichloroethene 19. methyl acetate 20. methylene chloride 21. nitromethane 22. 1-propanol 23. trans-1,2-dichloroethene 24. methyl tert-butyl ether 25. 2-methylpentane (spiked at 9%) 26. 2-butanone (MEK) 27. 2-butanol 28. cis-1,2-dichloroethene 29. acetic acid 30. isopropyl ether 31. ethyl acetate 32. hexane 33. chloroform 34. tetrahydrofuran 35. 2-methoxyethanol 36. 1,2-dichloroethane 37. methyl cyclopentane 38. 1,1,1-trichloroethane 39. 1,2-dimethoxyethane 40. methyl isopropyl ketone 41. 2,2-dimethoxypropane 42. isopropyl acetate 43. 1-butanol 44. benzene 45. carbon tetrachloride 46. ethylene glycol 47. formamide 48. 1,4-dioxane 49. trichloroethene 50. isooctane 51. 2-ethoxyethanol 52. n-heptane (C7) 53. isoamyl alcohol 54. hexanone (MIBK) 55. pyridine 56. methyl cyclohexane 57. dimethyl formamide (DMF) 58. 1,1,2-trichloroethane 59. 1-pentanol 60. isobutyl acetate 61. toluene 62. 2-hexanone (MBK) 63. dimethyl sulfoxide 64. butyl acetate 65. 1,1-diethoxypropane 66. N,N-dimethylacetamide 67. chlorobenzene 68. ethylbenzene 69. isoamyl acetate 70. p-xylene 71. m-xylene 72. o-xylene 73. anisole 74. isopropylbenzene (cumene) 75. 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone 76. sulfolane 77. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene *paraldehyde

Trifluoropropyl-methyl CF 3 Rtx-200 CH Si 2 3 O CH3

Rtx-200 Like the Rtx-1 1 the Rtx-200 column is low bleed and is offered in thick films (3.0 micron). It has better peak shapes for glycols and other polar analytes.. The Rtx- 200 still lacks the polarity necessary to better retain compounds, such as alcohols, ketones and glycols. A phase that can withstand higher temperatures and yet have wax-like characteristics would allow for better retention.

USP Solvents Rtx -200 GC_EV00464 Rtx -200 60m, 0.53mm, 3.00µm (cat.# 15088) Sample: solvents Conc.: solventless mixture ~1.3% each* Sample size: needle vapor Inj.: split, 250 C Septa purge: 5mL/min. Split vent flow: 100mL/min. ~1:13 split Carrier: helium Head pressure: 11.0psi constant pressure Linear velocity: 45.6 cm/sec @ 35 C Det: Mass Selective Scan range: 10amu to 260amu MS interface: open split interface ~1:7 split Oven temp.: 35 C (hold 4 min.) to 250 C @ 4 /min. 1. formaldehyde 2. water 3. chloromethane 4. methanol 5. acetaldehyde 6. ethylene oxide 7. chloroethane 8. ethanol 9. acetonitrile 10. acetone 11. 2-propanol 12. 2-chloropropane 13. diethylether 14. pentane 15. ethyl formate 16. formic acid 17. methylal 18. 1,1-dichloroethene 19. methyl acetate 20. methylene chloride 21. nitromethane 22. 1-propanol 23. trans-1,2-dichloroethene 24. methyl tert-butyl ether 25. 2-methylpentane (spiked at 9%) 26. 2-butanone (MEK) 27. 2-butanol 28. cis-1,2-dichloroethene 29. acetic acid 30. isopropyl ether 31. ethyl acetate 32. hexane 33. chloroform 34. tetrahydrofuran 35. 2-methoxyethanol 36. 1,2-dichloroethane 37. methyl cyclopentane 38. 1,1,1-trichloroethane 39. 1,2-dimethoxyethane 40. methyl isopropyl ketone 41. 2,2-dimethoxypropane 42. isopropyl acetate 43. 1-butanol 44. benzene 45. carbon tetrachloride 46. ethylene glycol 47. formamide 48. 1,4-dioxane 49. trichloroethene 50. isooctane 51. 2-ethoxyethanol 52. n-heptane (C7) 53. isoamyl alcohol 54. hexanone (MIBK) 55. pyridine 56. methyl cyclohexane 57. dimethyl formamide (DMF) 58. 1,1,2-trichloroethane 59. 1-pentanol 60. isobutyl acetate 61. toluene 62. 2-hexanone (MBK) 63. dimethyl sulfoxide 64. butyl acetate 65. 1,1-diethoxypropane 66. N,N-dimethylacetamide 67. chlorobenzene 68. ethylbenzene 69. isoamyl acetate 70. p-xylene 71. m-xylene 72. o-xylene 73. anisole 74. isopropylbenzene (cumene) 75. 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone 76. sulfolane 77. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene

Tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl-methyl CF CF CH Si 3 2 2 CH 3 5 2 Experimental Fluorinated Phase Tail Polymer O

Experimental Tail Polymer This is one of a series of experimental columns currently under investigation. Understandably, this polymer has similar characteristics to the Rtx-200. Direct comparisons, which maintain equal amounts of fluorine atoms, indicate that nitrogen containing compounds & ketones have less retention on this phase than the trifluoropropyl phase. This can also be seen in the chromatograms shown.

USP Solvents Experimental Fluorinated Polymer Tail GC_EV00589 Experimental Fluorinated Polymer Tail 60m, 0.53mm, 3.00µm Sample: solvents Conc.: solventless mixture ~1.3% each* Sample size: needle vapor Inj.: split, 250 C Septa purge: 5mL/min. Split vent flow: 100mL/min. ~1:13 split Carrier: helium Head pressure: 11.0psi constant pressure Linear velocity: 45.6 cm/sec @ 35 C Det: Mass Selective Scan range: 10amu to 260amu MS interface: open split interface ~1:7 split Oven temp.: 35 C (hold 4 min.) to 250 C @ 4 /min. 1. formaldehyde 2. water 3. chloromethane 4. methanol 5. acetaldehyde 6. ethylene oxide 7. chloroethane 8. ethanol 9. acetonitrile 10. acetone 11. 2-propanol 12. 2-chloropropane 13. diethylether 14. pentane 15. ethyl formate 16. formic acid 17. methylal 18. 1,1-dichloroethene 19. methyl acetate 20. methylene chloride 21. nitromethane 22. 1-propanol 23. trans-1,2-dichloroethene 24. methyl tert-butyl ether 25. 2-methylpentane (spiked at 9%) 26. 2-butanone (MEK) 27. 2-butanol 28. cis-1,2-dichloroethene 29. acetic acid 30. isopropyl ether 31. ethyl acetate 32. hexane 33. chloroform 34. tetrahydrofuran 35. 2-methoxyethanol 36. 1,2-dichloroethane 37. methyl cyclopentane 38. 1,1,1-trichloroethane 39. 1,2-dimethoxyethane 40. methyl isopropyl ketone 41. 2,2-dimethoxypropane 42. isopropyl acetate 43. 1-butanol 44. benzene 45. carbon tetrachloride 46. ethylene glycol 47. formamide 48. 1,4-dioxane 49. trichloroethene 50. isooctane 51. 2-ethoxyethanol 52. n-heptane (C7) 53. isoamyl alcohol 54. hexanone (MIBK) 55. pyridine 56. methyl cyclohexane 57. dimethyl formamide (DMF) 58. 1,1,2-trichloroethane 59. 1-pentanol 60. isobutyl acetate 61. toluene 62. 2-hexanone (MBK) 63. dimethyl sulfoxide 64. butyl acetate 65. 1,1-diethoxypropane 66. N,N-dimethylacetamide 67. chlorobenzene 68. ethylbenzene 69. isoamyl acetate 70. p-xylene 71. m-xylene 72. o-xylene 73. anisole 74. isopropylbenzene (cumene) 75. 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone 76. sulfolane 77. 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene *paraldehyde

1-hydroxypropyl-methyl OH CH Si 2 3 CH 3 Experimental Siloxane-based Wax Phase O

Experimental Siloxane-Based Wax Phase Years ago Restek attempted to fill the gap in polarity between polyethylene-glycol phases and bonded siloxane-based polymers by mixing the two phases together. The effects gave favorable retention of complex compound mixtures, such as the one presented in the chromatograms, but suffered many other problems. The bleed was high and the selectivity of these phases changed over time since the polyethylene-glycol bled at a higher rate than the dimethylpolysiloxane.. These phases do not mix well, which compromised the coating efficiency of the column. Development of a bonded siloxane wax-like phase could solve these problems and aid in the development of a successful solution to the OVI column.

New OVI Column Restek is developing a stationary phase that will resolve the Class I compounds from the Class II & III analytes at the concentrations required by the USP. The second goal is to resolve the Class II from the Class III, as well as added solvents and their isomers. Conventional polysiloxanes will not meet the design criteria.

For More Information... Author e-mail: e cenglish@restekcorp restekcorp.com Restek Corporation 110 Benner Circle Bellefonte, PA 16823 (800) 356-1688