Lecture 7: Gluing prevarieties; products

Similar documents
where a is any ideal of R. Lemma 5.4. Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space Moreover the open sets

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space. Moreover the open sets

Descent is a technique which allows construction of a global object from local data.

Linear, affine, and convex sets and hulls In the sequel, unless otherwise specified, X will denote a real vector space.

DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS BRIAN OSSERMAN

12 MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART C: MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. 4. Tensor product

An Introduction to Morita Theory

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

POL VAN HOFTEN (NOTES BY JAMES NEWTON)

= s j Ui U j. i, j, then s F(U) with s Ui F(U) G(U) F(V ) G(V )

FINITELY-GENERATED MODULES OVER A PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

On the smoothness and the totally strong properties for nearness frames

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

More metrics on cartesian products

LIMITS OF ALGEBRAIC STACKS

Affine transformations and convexity

R n α. . The funny symbol indicates DISJOINT union. Define an equivalence relation on this disjoint union by declaring v α R n α, and v β R n β

ÉTALE COHOMOLOGY. Contents

Affine and Riemannian Connections

42. Mon, Dec. 8 Last time, we were discussing CW complexes, and we considered two di erent CW structures on S n. We continue with more examples.

LECTURE V. 1. More on the Chinese Remainder Theorem We begin by recalling this theorem, proven in the preceeding lecture.

arxiv: v2 [math.ct] 1 Dec 2017

( 1) i [ d i ]. The claim is that this defines a chain complex. The signs have been inserted into the definition to make this work out.

arxiv: v4 [math.ag] 3 Sep 2016

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES EXAMPLES OF C ALGEBRAS

MAT 578 Functional Analysis

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS. 1. Recollections and the problem

Restricted Lie Algebras. Jared Warner

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Ballot Paths Avoiding Depth Zero Patterns

Math 101 Fall 2013 Homework #7 Due Friday, November 15, 2013

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

Exercise Solutions to Real Analysis

SUPER PRINCIPAL FIBER BUNDLE WITH SUPER ACTION

K-theoretic computations in enumerative geometry

2 MADALINA ROXANA BUNECI subset G (2) G G (called the set of composable pars), and two maps: h (x y)! xy : G (2)! G (product map) x! x ;1 [: G! G] (nv

DOUBLE POINTS AND THE PROPER TRANSFORM IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Math 396. Bundle pullback and transition matrices

Week 2. This week, we covered operations on sets and cardinality.

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

arxiv:alg-geom/ v3 6 Mar 2014

The Pseudoblocks of Endomorphism Algebras

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

9 Characteristic classes

Crystalline Cohomology

Journal of Algebra 368 (2012) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Journal of Algebra.

Projective change between two Special (α, β)- Finsler Metrics

Errata to Invariant Theory with Applications January 28, 2017

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 17 Feb 2017

Lecture 14 - Isomorphism Theorem of Harish-Chandra

MATH CLASS 27. Contents

20. Mon, Oct. 13 What we have done so far corresponds roughly to Chapters 2 & 3 of Lee. Now we turn to Chapter 4. The first idea is connectedness.

THE CARTIER ISOMORPHISM. These are the detailed notes for a talk I gave at the Kleine AG 1 in April Frobenius

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 5 Jun 2013

On the set of natural numbers

3 Holonomic D-Modules

Non-additive geometry

ON THE GRAYSON SPECTRAL SEQUENCE. Andrei Suslin

CONJUGACY IN THOMPSON S GROUP F. 1. Introduction

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 5, HIKARI Ltd,

ON THE EXTENDED HAAGERUP TENSOR PRODUCT IN OPERATOR SPACES. 1. Introduction

Homotopy Type Theory Lecture Notes

A CLASS OF RECURSIVE SETS. Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico 200 College Road Gallup, NM 87301, USA

a b a In case b 0, a being divisible by b is the same as to say that

A categorification of quantum sl n

Review of metric spaces. 1. Metric spaces, continuous maps, completeness

HIGHER ARITHMETIC CHOW GROUPS

Completions of ordered magmas

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 13

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

DETECTING LARGE GROUPS

17. Coordinate-Free Projective Geometry for Computer Vision

Plethystic algebra. Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, 5734 S. University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

An application of non-associative Composition-Diamond lemma

DOLD THEOREMS IN SHAPE THEORY

The Trifocal Tensor The geometric basis for the trifocal tensor

NOTES ON SIMPLIFICATION OF MATRICES

Infinitely Split Nash Equilibrium Problems in Repeated Games

Problem Set 9 Solutions

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 9 Nov 2018

Affine configurations of 4 lines in R 3

EQUIVALENCES OF DERIVED CATEGORIES AND K3 SURFACES DMITRI ORLOV

Polarized non-abelian representations of slim near-polar spaces

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

15.1 The geometric basis for the trifocal tensor Incidence relations for lines.

A FORMULA FOR EULER CHARACTERISTICS OF TAUTOLOGICAL LINE BUNDLES ON THE DELIGNE-MUMFORD MODULI SPACES. Y.P. Lee. U. C. Berkeley

Spectral Graph Theory and its Applications September 16, Lecture 5

Perfect Competition and the Nash Bargaining Solution

COUNTABLE-CODIMENSIONAL SUBSPACES OF LOCALLY CONVEX SPACES

Kuroda s class number relation

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 1

Assortment Optimization under MNL

Fixed points of IA-endomorphisms of a free metabelian Lie algebra

First day August 1, Problems and Solutions

NICHOLAS SWITALA. Week 1: motivation from local cohomology; Weyl algebras

Transcription:

Lecture 7: Glung prevaretes; products 1 The category of algebrac prevaretes Proposton 1. Let (f,ϕ) : (X,O X ) (Y,O Y ) be a morphsm of algebrac prevaretes. If U X and V Y are affne open subvaretes wth f (U) V, then (f U,ϕ U) : (U,O X U) (V,O Y V) s a morphsm of affne varetes. Proof. We clam that (f U,ϕ U) s the morphsm of rnged spaces assocated wth ψ : O Y (V) O X (U). We must show the followng: () for each p U, f (p) V corresponds to the maxmal deal ψ 1 (m p ); and () for each g O Y (V), ϕ Vg : O Y (V g ) O X (U f 1 V g ) s the canoncal morphsm O Y (V) g O X (U) ψ(g) nduced by ψ : O Y (V) O X (U). By Defnton 6.5, there exst affne open covers {V } of Y, and {U j },j of each f 1 V such that each restrcton (f j,ψ j ) : (U j,o X U j ) (V,O Y V ) s a morphsm of affne varetes. By Lemma 6.8, we can cover each V V by opens V k whch are smultaneously dstngushed as subsets of V and V. We can also cover each U U j f 1 V k by opens U jkl smultaneously dstngushed n U and U j. By Proposton 6.2, the U jkl and V k are affne varetes. As an exercse, check that the restrcted morphsms (U jkl,o X U jkl ) (V k,o Y V j ) nhert the property of beng morphsms of affne varetes. Replacng {U j },j wth {U jkl },j,k,l, and {V } wth {V k },k, we may assume that the U j U and the V V are dstngushed opens. Consder (). Choose and j such that p U j, and let V V and U j U the dstngushed open correspondng to a O Y (V) and b j O X (U), respectvely. By Proposton 4.14, we have a commutatve dagram O Y (V) O Y (V) a O Y (V ) ψ λ ψ µ j ψ j,v O X (U) O X (U) bj O X (U j ) n whch λ and µ j are the localzaton maps, and ψ s nduced by the unversal property of the localzaton. By Exercse 4.6(), m p = µ 1 j (m p) for some maxmal deal m p O X (U) bj. Hence, ψ 1 (m p ) = λ 1 (ψ 1 (m p )). By hypothess, ψ 1 (m p ) s the maxmal deal correspondng to f (p) = f j (p) V. Clam () follows from the sheaf condton. Corollary 2. Let (f,ϕ) : (X,O X ) (Y,O Y ) and (g,ψ) : (Y,O Y ) (Z,O Z ) be morphsms of algebrac prevaretes. Then (g,ψ) (f,ϕ) s also a morphsm of algebrac prevaretes. In partcular, algebrac prevaretes over k form a category, whch we denote by PreVar k. 1

Proof. Ths composte s gven by (gf,ψ g ϕ). As g f O X = (gf ) O X, ths s a morphsm of rnged spaces. Choose fnte affne open covers {W } of Z, {V j },j of g 1 W, and {U jk },j,k of f 1 V j. By Proposton 1, (U jk,o X U jk ) (V j,o Y V j ) and (V j,o Y V j ) (W,O Z W ) are morphsms of affne varetes. Snce compostes of morphsms of affne varetes are stable under composton, (gf,ψ g ϕ) s a morphsm of algebrac prevaretes. Exercse 3. The functor X (X,O X ) from the category of algebrac sets to that algebrac prevaretes s fully fathful. Notaton: We wll frequently suppress structure sheaves from the notaton when referrng to algebrac prevaretes. If X s an algebrac prevarety, O X wll denote ts structure sheaf, unless otherwse specfed. We wll denote the morphsm (f,ϕ) of algebrac prevaretes by the symbols for the contnuous map f of underlyng topologcal spaces. 2 Glung Defnton 4. An open mmerson s a morphsm of prevaretes (j,ϕ) : (X,O X ) (Y,O Y ) that factors as (X,O X ) (j,ϕ ) (U,O Y U) (j,d OY U) (Y,O Y ), where j : U Y s the ncluson of an open subprevarety, and (j,ϕ ) s an somorphsm. Proposton 5. Let X 1,..., X n be algebrac prevaretes. For each 1,j n, let U j X be an open subset, and f j : U j U j an somorphsm of rnged spaces such that: () for each,j, f j = f 1 j ; () for each,j,k, f j (U j U k ) = U j U jk ; () for each,j,k, f k U j U k = (f jk U j U jk )(f j U j U k ). There exsts an algebrac prevarety X, unque up to unque somorphsm, and open mmersons ϕ : X X such that, for each famly of morphsms {ψ : X Y} such that ψ U j = (ψ j U j )f j for each,j, there exsts a unque morphsm ψ : X Y such that ψϕ = ψ for each. We say that X s obtaned by glung the X along the U j. Proof. The topologcal space underlyng X s the quotent of X by the equvalence relaton generated by x f j (x) for each x U. The contnuous map underlyng ϕ s nduced by the canoncal map X X. The structure sheaf O X s defned by O X (U) {(g ) O X (ϕ 1 U) g U j ϕ 1 U = g j f j U j ϕ 1 Exercse 6. Complete the proof of Proposton 5 by showng that (X,O X ) s a prevarety wth the requred propertes. Example 7. Every algebrac prevarety s obtaned by teratng ths process, startng from fntely many affne varetes. Here are a couple mportant examples of non-affne varetes. U}. 2

() Let X 1 = X 2 = A 1 k, U 1 = U 2 = A 1 k {0}. Glung X 1 and X 2 along the dentty x x : U 1 U 2, we obtan the affne lne wth doubled orgn. () Let X 1 = X 2 = A 1 k, U 1 = U 2 = A 1 k {0}. Glung X 1 and X 2 along the somorphsm x 1/x : U 1 U 2, we obtan the projectve lne P 1 k. Remark 8. If X s obtaned by glung the prevaretes X along the U j as n Proposton 5 and Y s prevarety, then a morphsm of rnged spaces f : Y X s a morphsm of prevaretes f and only f f : f 1 X X s a morphsm of prevaretes for each. Proposton 9. If X and Y are algebrac prevaretes over k, and Y s affne, then the map (f,ϕ) ϕ Y : mor PreVark (X, Y) mor CAlg(k) (O Y (Y), O X (X)) s bjectve,.e., specfyng a morphsm from any prevarety nto any affne varety s equvalent to specfyng the nduced morphsm on global sectons of structure sheaves. Proof. Choose an affne open cover X = U. By Lemma 6.8, we can cover each U U j by affne opens U jk whch are dstngushed n both U and U j. By Proposton 5, gvng a morphsm f : X Y s equvalent to gvng morphsms f : U Y such that f U U j = f j U U j for each,j, or, equvalently, such that f U jk = f j U jk for each,j,k. Snce Y, U, U jk are affne, ths s equvalent to gvng maps of k-algebras O Y (Y) O X (U ) such that the squares O Y (Y) O X (U ) O X (U j ) O X (U jk ) commute. As O X s a sheaf, ths s equvalent to gvng a map O Y (Y) O X (X). 3 Products Defnton 10. If C s a category and X, Y C, then ther product, f t exsts, s an object X Y C equpped wth morphsms π 1 : X Y X and π 2 : X Y Y such that, for each Z C and each par of morphsms f : Z X and g : Z Y, there exsts a unque morphsm (f,g) : Z X Y such that f = π 1 (f,g) and g = π 2 (f,g): f Y Z (f,g) X Y π 2 g π 1 X If the product X Y exsts, then t s unque up to unque somorphsm. If the product X Y exsts for each X, Y C and C admts a fnal object, we say that C admts fnte products. 3

Lemma 11. The tensor product A k B of two affne k-algebras A and B s another such. Proof. Suppose α A k B and α r = 0 for some r Z >0. Wrte α = n =1 a b wth a A, b B. We may assume the b are lnearly ndependent over k: f b 1 = n =2 c b for some c k, for example, then n a b = a 1 ( n ) n c b + a b = =1 =2 =2 n (c a 1 + a ) b and we may thus elmnate any lnear dependences n the b. For each maxmal deal m A, the quotent A A/m k nduces a map A k B k k B B. Ths map sends α to a nlpotent element of B, hence to 0. Snce the b are lnearly ndependent over k, we must have a m for each. Ths s true for each m, so each a belongs to the ntersecton of all maxmal deals of A. By Hlbert s Nullstellensatz, ths ntersecton s the radcal of the zero deal, so each a s nlpotent, hence 0. Thus, α = 0. Lemma 12. The category of affne k-varetes admts fnte products. Proof. Snce the category of affne k-varetes s ant-equvalent to the category of affne k-algebras, t suffces to show that the category of affne k-algebras admts fnte coproducts, where coproducts are defned by reversng the drectons of the arrows n the defnton of products. Frst, note that k s an ntal object n the category of affne k-algebras,.e., every affne k-algebra A admts a unque k-algera map k A. Suppose A and B are two affne k-algebras. Ther tensor product A k B s reduced by Lemma 11. By defnton, gvng a k-algebra map A k B C s equvalent to gvng a par of k-algebra maps A C and B C, so A k B s a coproduct n the category of affne k-algebras. Lemma 13. If X and Y are affne k-varetes, then ther product X k Y n the category of affne k-varetes s also a product n PreVar k. Proof. Gvng a par of morphsms Z X and Z Y s equvalent to gvng a par of maps O X (X) O Z (Z) and O Y (Y) O Z (Z), whch s equvalent to gvng a map O X k Y(X k Y) = O X (X) k O Y (Y) O Z (Z), whch s equvalent to gvng a morphsm Z X k Y. Exercse 14. () If X and Y are prevaretes over k and ther product X k Y exsts, show that ponts of X k Y are n natural bjecton wth ordered pars (p,q) wth p X and q Y. () By consderng A 1 k k A 1 k = A2 k, show as an exercse that the Zarsk topoloy on a product of affne varetes s strctly fner than the product topology n general. Proposton 15. The category PreVar k admts fnte products. =2 4

Proof. The affne k-algebra k corresponds to the algebrac prevarety whose underlyng topologcal space s a pont, and whose structure sheaf s gven by 0 and k. There s clearly a unque map from each prevarety to ths one, so t s a fnal object. Let X and Y be prevaretes, wth fnte affne open covers X = U and Y = j V j. The products U k V j exst by Lemmata 12 and 13. Glue the U k V j along the (U V j ) (U k V l ) = (U U k ) (V j V l ), and let X k Y denote the resultng prevarety. The projecton morphsms X k Y X and X k Y Y are nduced by the unversal property of glung and Remark 8. We clam that X k Y s a product n the category of prevaretes over k. Gvng a par of morphsms Z X and Z Y s equvalent to gvng compatble famles of morphsms f 1 U U and g 1 V j V j, whch s equvalent to gvng a compatble famly of morphsms f 1 U g 1 V j U k V j by Lemma 13. The latter s equvalent to gvng a morphsm Z X k Y, snce the f 1 U g 1 V j cover Z. 5