Wailupe, Oÿahu. Wailupe, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Similar documents
Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Keaÿahala, Oÿahu. Keaÿahala, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Wailua, Maui WATERSHED FEATURES

Moanalua, Oÿahu. Moanalua, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

MAUI. Introduction - Maui ISLAND OF MAUI

South Florida Coastal Storm Surge and Mapping Study

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Integrating Aquatic Insect Data Into Hawaiian Stream Assessments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued)

Miami-Dade County Technical Update Meeting South Florida Coastal Study. May 11, 2016

The Refugia Concept: Using Watershed Analysis to Prioritize Salmonid Habitat for Conservation and Restoration

Land Use Methods & Metrics Development Outcome

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects

NatureServe s Federally Listed Species Location Data Play an Important Role in EPA s FIFRA Risk Assessments

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

Krešimir Žganec, doc. dr. sc. University of Zadar

George Host and Tom Hollenhorst Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota Duluth

Southwest LRT Habitat Analysis. May 2016 Southwest LRT Project Technical Report

Chapter 3 - White Oak River Subbasin Includes Bogue Sound and the Newport River

Using Grassland Vegetation Inventory Data

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project

Regional Sediment Management

Using GIS for Watershed Protection and Management

CHAPTER 12: TERRESTRIAL LAYERS

Assessing Michigan s Biological diversity. Michigan Natural Features Inventory MSU Extension

Information Paper. Kansas City District. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Project Jim and Olivia Hare Wildlife Area, MO

Wetlands and Riparian Mapping Framework Technical Meeting

Section B - Chapter 13 Neuse River Subbasin Bay River and Pamlico Sound

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Savannah District s Revised SOP: Moving Towards A Functional Approach. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

PAD-US (CBI Edition) Version 2: Standards and Procedures

Landscape Planning and Habitat Metrics

Great California Delta Trail Blueprint for Contra Costa and Solano Counties GIS AND MAPPING MEMORANDUM JULY 2010

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

GALVESTON BAY RSM Moving toward an Integrated, Cooperative, and Holistic Approach to Estuarine Sediments

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

AIM Master Sample: A Tool to Support Statistically Valid Sample Designs

Stream Ecological Assessment in Virginia Using INSTAR. Greg Garman Leonard Smock Stephen McIninch William Shuart Virginia Commonwealth University

CWC Water Plan

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Chapter Five. Synopsis

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

The Governance of Land Use

Figure 1: Mapping occurrences on USGS topographic maps. Needs Figure 2: Comparison of buffered points and digitized occurrence boundaries

One of the many strengths of a GIS is that you can stack several data layers on top of each other for visualization or analysis. For example, if you

Progress on Defense-Related Uranium Mines Program

Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies CSD Indicators of sustainable development 1996

Eco-Logical Free Bridge Area Congestion Relief Project

Opportunities to Improve Ecological Functions of Floodplains and Reduce Flood Risk along Major Rivers in the Puget Sound Basin

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

Ethiopia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Study of Land Use and Land Cover of Chaksu block, Jaipur through Remote Sensing and GIS

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion

Data Dictionary Hudson River Features: Estuary shoreline Flood scenario Emergency Services: Police stations Fire stations EMS

I L L I N 0 I S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

Mapping tidal wetlands and their losses on the U.S. West Coast: new methods, new insights

Data Dictionary for Network of Conservation Areas Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Background. North Cascades Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement. Steve Rochetta

Assessment. Assessment

California Urban and Biodiversity Analysis (CURBA) Model

Chapter 4 French Broad River Subbasin Including the: French Broad River, Little Ivy Creek (River), Ivy Creek, California Creek and Bull Creek

Assessing the Regional Vulnerability of Large Scale Mining in Ghana: An Application of Multi Criteria Analysis

Hannah Moore CEE Juvenile Bull Trout Distribution in the South Fork Walla Walla River, Oregon

ARCH PROJET Activity 1 -Synthesis-

Chapter 3. Description of the Study Area. Karl Taboga, James Stafford and Paul Taucher 3-19

Use of Remote Sensing and GIS for Wetland, Riparian, and Watershed Assessment, Restoration, and Monitoring

Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.

An Integrated Habitat Classification and Map of the Lake Erie Basin: Final Report

Project Leader: Project Partners:

GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

Biological Response to the Gold King Mine Release in the Animas and San Juan Rivers

Springsnails. An Introduction for Conservation Partners. Jeff Sorensen, AZ Game & Fish Dept. AZ Heritage Fund

Cannon River Watershed 2017 Zonation Update Clarification

A Comparison of the Social Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Urban and Rural Contexts

Development of Riparian Maps for Sonoma County Long Term Riparian Corridor Conservation. Mark Tukman & Dylan Loudon Tukman Geospatial

Locational business intelligence in the U.S. Forest Service: Geospatial Accomplishment Reporting ESRI USER CONFERENCE 2015 JULY 21, 2015

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

Description DESCRIPTION

Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3

Heather Schlosser Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Studies Group August 28, 2008

Environmental. Plan Update. By Jodie Pavlica

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

Most people used to live like this

Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis & Lindenmayer 2015

Courtesy of Tomi Petr

Effects of input DEM data spatial resolution on Upstream Flood modeling result A case study in Willamette river downtown Portland

Will County Ecological Database Manual

Chapter 32. Australia & New Zealand

2013 Esri International User Conference July 8 12, 2013 San Diego, California. Unleashing the POWER of GIS at Questa Mine

Ecoregional Assessment of Biodiversity Conservation Executive Summary September 2006 Hawaiian High Islands

Gina Hunt Chesapeake Bay Program Fish Habitat Coordinator

Transcription:

DAR Watershed Code: 33005 WATERSHED FEATURES Wailupe watershed occurs on the island of Oÿahu. The Hawaiian meaning of the name is kite water. The area of the watershed is 3.4 square mi (8.8 square km), with maximum elevation of 2612 ft (796 m). The watershed's DAR cluster code is 5, meaning that the watershed is medium size, steep in the upper watershed, and with little embayment. The percent of the watershed in the different land use districts is as follows: 0% agricultural, 66.2% conservation, 0% rural, and 33.8% urban. Land Stewardship: Percentage of the land in the watershed managed or controlled by the corresponding agency or entity. Note that this is not necessarily ownership. Military Federal State 0.0 0.0 44.8 OHA 0.0 County Nature Conservancy Other Private 17.8 0.0 Atlas of Hawaiian Watersheds & Their Aquatic Resources 317 37.4 4/7/2008

Land Management Status: Percentage of the watershed in the categories of biodiversity protection and management created by the Hawaii GAP program. Permanent Biodiversity Managed for Multiple Protected but Protection Uses Unmanaged Unprotected 0.0 0.0 62.6 37.4 Land Use: Areas of the various categories of land use. These data are based on NOAA C- CAP remote sensing project. Percent Square mi Square km High Intensity Developed 8.9 0.30 0.79 Low Intensity Developed 14.5 0.49 1.28 Cultivated 0.0 0.00 0.00 Grassland 3.9 0.13 0.35 Scrub/Shrub 61.4 2.10 5.43 Evergreen Forest 8.9 0.30 0.79 Palustrine Forested 0.0 0.00 0.00 Palustrine Scrub/Shrub 0.0 0.00 0.00 Palustrine Emergent 0.0 0.00 0.00 Estuarine Forested 0.0 0.00 0.00 Bare Land 1.9 0.07 0.17 Unconsolidated Shoreline 0.0 0.00 0.00 Water 0.4 0.01 0.04 Unclassified 0.0 0.00 0.00 STREAM FEATURES Wailupe is a perennial stream. Total stream length is 8.4 mi (13.5 km). The terminal stream order is 2. Reach Type Percentages: The percentage of the stream's channel length in each of the reach type categories. Estuary Lower Middle Upper Headwaters 0.0 10.9 34.7 54.4 0.0 The following stream(s) occur in the watershed: Kuluÿï Laulaupoe Wailupe BIOTIC SAMPLING EFFORT Biotic samples were gathered in the following year(s): 1990 2007 Distribution of Biotic Sampling: The number of survey locations that were sampled in the various reach types. Survey type Estuary Lower Middle Upper Headwaters Damselfly Surveys 0 1 0 0 0 DAR Rapid BioAssessment 0 1 1 0 0 318

Species List Native Species Fish Awaous guamensis Eleotris sandwicensis Kuhlia xenura Mugil cephalus Introduced Species Amphibians Bufo marinus Crustaceans Macrobrachium lar Fish Archocentrus nigrofasciatus Mugilogobius cavifrons Poecilia reticulata Tilapia sp. unidentified poeciliid Reptiles Chrysemys sp. Snails Planorbid sp. Pomacea sp. Tarebia granifera Thiarid sp. BIOTA INFORMATION Species Distributions: Presence (P) of species in different stream reaches. Scientific Name Status Estuary Lower Middle Upper Headwaters Eleotris sandwicensis Endemic P Kuhlia xenura Endemic P Awaous guamensis Indigenous P Mugil cephalus Indigenous P Bufo marinus Introduced P Macrobrachium lar Introduced P Archocentrus nigrofasciatus Introduced P Mugilogobius cavifrons Introduced P Poecilia reticulata Introduced P Tilapia sp. Introduced P unidentified poeciliid Introduced P P Chrysemys sp. Introduced P Planorbid sp. Introduced P Pomacea sp. Introduced P P Tarebia granifera Introduced P Thiarid sp. Introduced P 319

HISTORIC RANKINGS Historic Rankings: These are rankings of streams from historical studies. "Yes" means the stream was considered worthy of protection by that method. Some methods include non-biotic data in their determination. See Atlas Key for details. Multi-Attribute Prioritization of Streams - Potential Heritage Streams (1998): No Hawaii Stream Assessment Rank (1990): not ranked U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service High Quality Stream (1988): No The Nature Conservancy- Priority Aquatic Sites (1985): No National Park Service - Nationwide Rivers Inventory (1982): No Current DAR Decision Rule Status: The following criteria are used by DAR to consider the biotic importance of streams. "Yes" means that watershed has that quality. Native Insect Diversity Native Macrofauna Absence of Priority 1 > 19 spp. Diversity > 5 spp. Introduced No No No Abundance of Any Presence of Candidate Endangered Newcomb's Native Species Endangered Species Snail Habitat No No No 320

321

322

323

REFERENCES 2006. Polhemus, D.A. Maps of Damselfly Locations. 2008. Hawaiÿi Division of Aquatic Resources. Rapid Assessment Surveys in DAR Aquatic Surveys Database. 324