MT Prospecting. Map Resistivity. Determine Formations. Determine Structure. Targeted Drilling

Similar documents
Magnetotelluric (MT) Method

An Experimental Magnetotelluric Short Sounding During High Sun Spot Activity Cycle in 2013

Peter R. Milligan. Stephan Thiel. Geoscience Australia. The University of Adelaide. MT acquisition & processing

1D and 2D Inversion of the Magnetotelluric Data for Brine Bearing Structures Investigation

Introducing the Stratagem EH4. Electrical Conductivity Imaging System Hybrid-Source Magnetotellurics

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Magnetotelluric and Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Study of Aquistore CO 2 Sequestration Site, near Estevan, Saskatchewan

RESISTIVITY SURVEYING AND ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS

Gravity-Magnetic & Magneto-Telluric surveys in Purnea Onland Basin, India - A case history.

APPENDIX A: Magnetotelluric Data in Relation to San Pedro Mesa Structural. The San Pedro Mesa structural high (discussed in main text of paper) was

Data Repository Comeau et al., (2015)

Western EARS Geothermal Geophysics Context Mar-2016 William Cumming

A Brief Introduction to Magnetotellurics and Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods

Geophysics Course Introduction to DC Resistivity

Integrated Geophysical Model for Suswa Geothermal Prospect using Resistivity, Seismics and Gravity Survey Data in Kenya

Lesson 1 Introduction to geophysical methods Emanuele Forte

Three-dimensional geophysical modelling of the Alalobeda geothermal field

PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)

Vertical and horizontal resolution considerations for a joint 3D CSEM and MT inversion

Exploration of Geothermal High Enthalpy Resources using Magnetotellurics an Example from Chile

Walkaway Seismic Experiments: Stewart Gulch, Boise, Idaho

Identified a possible new offset location where the customer is currently exploring drill options.

Magnetic and Gravity Methods for Geothermal Exploration

Available online Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2016, 3(2):1-7. Research Article

Geophysics for Geothermal Exploration

Darnley Bay Resources Preliminary Airborne Survey Results

3. Magnetic Methods / 62

Geophysics and Mapping. presented by: Stephen Brown

Electronic Geophysical Surveys LirJted, 250 South Fell Avenue, North Burnahy 2, B. C. Telenhone:

Principles of Applied Geophysics

C5 Magnetic exploration methods data analysis techniques

POTASH DRAGON CHILE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC (TEM) METHOD. LLAMARA and SOLIDA PROJECTS SALAR DE LLAMARA, IQUIQUE, REGION I, CHILE

We N Geophysical Near-surface Characterization for Static Corrections: Multi-physics Survey in Reggane Field, Algeria

A resolution comparison of horizontal and vertical magnetic transfer functions

. Slide 1. Geological Survey of Ethiopia, P.O.Box 2302, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Magnetotelluric Array and Magnetic Magnetotelluric Surveys

Hendra Grandis 1 and Prihadi Sumintadireja 2

Hamed Aber 1 : Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran. Mir Sattar Meshin chi asl 2 :

Exploring for geothermal reservoirs using broadband 2-D MT and gravity in Hungary

An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration

Characterizing a geothermal reservoir using broadband 2-D MT survey in Theistareykir, Iceland

3D Modeling for exploration

Magnetotelluric Survey in an Extremely Noisy Environment at the Pohang Low-Enthalpy Geothermal Area, Korea

RESISTIVITY STRUCTURE OF PAKA GEOTHERMAL PROSPECT IN KENYA

RESISTIVITY IMAGING IN EASTERN NEVADA USING THE AUDIOMAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD FOR HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK STUDIES. Abstract.

September 16, 2010 Magnetic surveying

Main Menu. Douglas Oldenburg University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada

Numerical modeling of Z-TEM (airborne AFMAG) responses to guide exploration strategies Bob Lo*, Geotech Ltd., Michael Zang, Exploration Syndicate Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES APPENDICES

3D MAGNETOTELLURIC SURVEY AT THE YANAIZU-NISHIYAMA GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NORTHERN JAPAN

Geothermal Energy Resources Exploration using Gravity and magnetics. By Mariita, N.O. KenGen

ASSESSMENT REPORT N 0. REPORT ON HORIZONTAL COPLANAR LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY HOUSTON AREA OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AQUITAINE COMPANY OF CANADA DURING

Nanometrics Posthole Seismometers. World Class Performance

Mapping of Mesozoic Sediments below Deccan trap using Magnetotelluric Method.

Saskatchewan s Mineral Resources Lesson: Exploring for Minerals in Saskatchewan: Geophysics Using Magnetics to Find a Mine

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

3D MAGNETOTELLURIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COSO GEOTHERMAL FIELD

Common Exploration Methods.

THREE DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF GEOELECTRICAL STRUCTURE BASED ON MT AND TDEM DATA IN MORI GEOTHERMAL FIELD, HOKKAIDO, JAPAN

RADON EMANOMETRY IN URANIUM EXPLORATION USING ACTIVATED CHARCOAL : NAMIBIAN CASE STUDIES. Dr. B. Corner*, H. Sinclair** and D.

Resistivity Survey in Alid Geothermal Area, Eritrea

CORPORATE PROFILE Airborne Geophysics for Mineral Exploration

Downloaded 01/09/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Prof. Giuseppe Mandrone Prof. Cesare Comina dott. Luca Guglielmetti Dept. Earth Science, Univ. Torino (ITA)

Interpretation Report on Borehole TDEM Surveys

The Afar Rift Consortium

World Leaders in Ground Geophysics. Since 1986

Distortion Effects on Magnetotelluric Sounding Data Investigated by 3D Modeling of High-Resolution Topography

Resistivity structure of Sumikawa geothermal field, northeastern Japan, obtained from magnetotelluric data. Toshihiro Uchida

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION. 2. THE D.C. RESISTIVITY METHOD 2.1 Equipment 2.2 Survey Procedure 2.3 Data Reduction

INTERPRETATION OF RESISTIVITY SOUNDINGS IN THE KRÝSUVÍK HIGH-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL AREA, SW-ICELAND, USING JOINT INVERSION OF TEM AND MT DATA

Figure 1: Location of principal shallow conductors at Alpala (anomalies C0-C10; 5 Ohm/m surfaces, red) and shallow zones of electrical chargeability

LOZAR RADAR INTRODUCTORY PRESENTATION COAL SURVEYING

Geophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications

The Resistivity Structure of the Abaya Geothermal field,

Seismoelectric Ground-flow DC-4500 Locator

GROUND ACOUSTIC PENETRATION

EXTREMELY FAST IP USED TO DELINEATE BURIED LANDFILLS. Norman R. Carlson, Cris Mauldin Mayerle, and Kenneth L. Zonge

IRETHERM: Multidimensional Geophysical Modelling of the Southern Margin of the Dublin Basin

For personal use only

Characterizing a Geothermal Reservoir Using Broadband 2-D MT Survey in Theistareykir, Iceland

CAMBRIDGE NICKEL PROSPECT EXPLORATION UPDATE. XRF analysis of reconnaissance drill holes at Cambridge has been completed

PE OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION METHODS COURSE STRUCTURE. I. FUNDAMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS (5 Hrs.) III. SEISMIC REFLECTION METHOD

Comparison of geophysical. techniques to determine depth to. bedrock in complex weathered. environments of the Mount Crawford. region, South Australia

APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICS TO GEOTHERMAL ENERGY EXPLORATION AND MONITORING OF ITS EXPLOITATION

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, MS 74R316C, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley CA 94720, USA.

Topic 7: Geophysical and Remote Sensing Models. Presenter: Greg Ussher Organisation:SKM

Exploring for geothermal reservoirs using broadband 2-D MT and gravity in Hungary

Imagerie à l'échelle d'un massif, par méthodes électromagnétiques actives et passives. Liens avec Resif

Comparison of 1-D, 2-D and 3-D Inversion Approaches of Interpreting Electromagnetic Data of Silali Geothermal Area

First Technical Report Geophysical experiments near Kajiado town

TIME DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETICS IN MARS ANALOG ENVIRONMENTS: COMPARING TWO FIELD STUDIES. Joern A. Jernsletten 1

VLF -MT Survey around Nakadake crater at Aso Volcano

For personal use only

Integrated interpretation of multimodal geophysical data for exploration of geothermal resources Case study: Yamagawa geothermal field in Japan

Daniele Colombo* Geosystem-WesternGeco, Calgary, AB M.Virgilio Geosystem-WesternGeco, Milan, Italy.

APPLICATION OF PASSIVE SEISMIC IN DETERMINING OVERBURDEN THICKNESS: NORTH WEST ZAMBIA

The Role of Magnetotellurics in Geothermal Exploration

Comparison of Fixed-Wing Airborne Electromagnetic 1D inversion methods

Feasibility and design study of a multicomponent seismic survey: Upper Assam Basin

Transcription:

MT Prospecting Map Resistivity Determine Formations Determine Structure Targeted Drilling Cross-sectional interpretation before and after an MT survey of a mineral exploration prospect containing volcanic rocks.

MT Overview Magnetotellurics (MT) is a geophysical method for imaging the electrical resistivity and structure of the earth, from the near-surface down to hundreds of kilometers. MT is a passive geophysical method which uses natural electromagnetic field variations (caused by solar radiation/particles or atmospheric sources, e.g., lightning discharges), which induce electric currents in the subsurface. Magneto inferring magnetic fields and telluric inferring electric fields in the ground (tellus, Latin for earth ).

Resistivity Ranges Electrical resistivity of rocks and minerals is an important physical property to measure as part of attempts to understand geological structures and processes. It varies by many orders of magnitude, from very resistive crystalline igneous rocks, to very conductive saline-filled sedimentary rocks.

Technology Comparison Depth information is obtained by measuring the time variations over a range of frequencies. High frequencies penetrate into the earth to shallow depths only, while low frequencies penetrate deeper. Information is obtained from a few tens of metres depth to hundreds of kilometres depth.

MT Signal Sources Worldwide lightning activity at frequencies of 10,000 Hz to 1 Hz and geomagnetic micropulsations at frequencies of 1 Hz to 0.001 Hz provide the majority of natural signal used by the MT method. Varying on hourly, daily, yearly cycles Ground Wave Lightning Solar Wind 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 Frequency in Hz

Applications and Benefits Exploration Base metals (nickel and precious metal exploration, as well as for kimberlite) mapping High-resistivity surface (volcanics, carbonates, igneous) Overthrust, fold belts, volcanics Can be combined with seismic or other methods to enhance understanding Explores to depths in excess of 500m, typically kilometers Geothermal Energy Mapping of very deep seated structures bearing high temperature fluids. Reconnaissance or Detail Detail: prospect definition - spacing = 250m - 500m on profiles or grids Recon: areal coverage - spacing = 1-5 km on profiles or grids Adaptable In any topography stations can be put out, in even the roughest conditions Multiple profile directions can be provided from a single survey

Advantages and disadvantages of MT Data Pros Great depth of penetration (10's of kms) No transmitter or source required Light-weight equipment --very portable Good production rate (2-5 km/day) Better resolution than gravity/mag Well-developed and fast interpretation procedure Little impact on environment Can access almost anywhere Cons Static Shift - Near-surface distortions to electric field created by resistivity variation at surface additional TDEM data required for correction Static shift of apparent resistivity curves sometimes significant Resolution less than seismic Data processing and modeling are complex Inversion techniques rely on smooth models, tougher to interpret in complex areas

Survey Planning Customized survey layouts are constructed to cover areas of interest. Denser and coarser stations layout according to size and target depth. In the field stations are placed where the best contacts are available with both safe access and within reasonable specifications. Profiles are created as per geological strike and client requirements. Data are analyzed to client specifications, either single profile directions, or multiple as shown.

Data Acquisition & Field Setup Five channels at each station Flexible site locations Two to five stations simultaneously No Line restrictions GPS synchronization between stations 24-hour recording/layout/pickup cycle In-field processing and editing

Site Deployment

Remote MT - Data Record The time series record, showing (from top) electric and magnetic data varying with time for five channels plus remote reference (i.e. for correction) Electric X Electric Y Magnetic X Magnetic Y Magnetic Z Magnetic X R Magnetic X R 1000 sec

How Resistivity is Computed Impedance tensor is measured at surface Computing apparent resistivity (and phase) as a function of frequency a 1 Ex / Hy 2 r a 5f Two values computed, r xy and r yx, for the two orthogonal pairs of Electric and Magnetic sensors in horizontal directions, Thus can interpret for strike and dip directions

Depth of Investigation The depth of investigation is a result of the frequency and resistivity of the subsurface (Skin depth) Lower frequency = deeper penetration Higher resistivity = deeper penetration Skin depth is an approximate estimate of depth of penetration at particular frequency and resistivity Skin depth (in meters) = 500 r / r f where = resistivity and f = frequency

Processing and Interpretation Process Raw time series data to create a database Multiple Tensors (components) Review all Tensors (components) for QA/QC Review the initial data to ensure it makes geological/geophysical sense Production of 1D ( sounding) models ( Depth Profiles) Perform any valid edits / filtering for noise or signal strength Produce 2D inversion models using the latest software Combine and produce 3D representations of data and inversions Create Coloured Cross-sections and Maps Integration with Geology, Drill Holes and Legacy Data

Many Data Components Apparent Resistivity with Tensor Data Phase Showing Tensor Data Tipper Magnetics and Tensor Data Dimensionality Typical Exploration Range

Data Analysis Shallow Resistive Conductive Deep Apparent Resistivity Apparent resistivity changes in 2 directions (x and y depending on layout) Deeper Conductor Phase Phase changes in 2 directions Resistive Conductive Deeper Conductor Tipper (Vertical) Magnetics Vertical Magnetics with depth Complex Complicated Induction Vectors Useful in detecting conductors Dimensionality (Polar Diagrams) Defines Layers, 1D to 3D, i.e. complexity

1D - Depth Profiles Defines Layering under a single station (sounding) Apparent resistivity changes in multiple layers under each station Layers are determined from near surface to great depths Models help to QA/QC all data Data collection enables kilometers of depth information This sounding shows good data to over 10km Multiple sites are combined to produce a 2D image of the property Depending on the survey design, many profiles (lines) can be extracted, giving both strike and cross strike profile information

2D - Sections Multiple sites are combined and inverted Mapping of conductive and resistive areas Structural Interpretation Resistive Zone Future Drill Planning

MT Sections 3D - Presentation Presentation of Multiple Cross-sections to Analyse Changes Property Wide Understanding Near Surface and Deep Geological Understanding Integration and Compilation of Different Data Sets in One Database Good Drill Hole Results! 3D Magnetics

The Exploration Process Survey Design Data QA/QC 1D Target Generation 3D 2D