Introduction to Numerical Relativity

Similar documents
7 Curvature of a connection

Lecture II: Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity

Perelman s Dilaton. Annibale Magni (TU-Dortmund) April 26, joint work with M. Caldarelli, G. Catino, Z. Djadly and C.

1 Curvature of submanifolds of Euclidean space

Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces

Lecture XXXIV: Hypersurfaces and the 3+1 formulation of geometry

THE INITIAL VALUE FORMULATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

PAPER 52 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Week 9: Einstein s field equations

Covarient Formulation Lecture 8

Solving Einstein s Equation Numerically III

ON THE LOCAL VERSION OF THE CHERN CONJECTURE: CMC HYPERSURFACES WITH CONSTANT SCALAR CURVATURE IN S n+1

Gravitation: Special Relativity

Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics

t, H = 0, E = H E = 4πρ, H df = 0, δf = 4πJ.

Solving Einstein s Equations: PDE Issues

HAMILTONIAN FORMULATION OF f (Riemann) THEORIES OF GRAVITY

UNIVERSIDAD DE SONORA

Cartesian Tensors. e 2. e 1. General vector (formal definition to follow) denoted by components

QUANTUM EINSTEIN S EQUATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ALGEBRA

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

A.1 Appendix on Cartesian tensors

the components of the normal as a contravariant vector n. Notice now that n fi n ff = 1 and hence ( 0= (4) r i (n fi n ff ) = (4) r i n fi n ff + n fi

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 2 Aug 2010

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 1 Jul 2014

1 The Classical Embedding Problem

Metrisability of Painleve equations and Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type

PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

Numerical Relativity

Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions

Introduction to Numerical Relativity I. Erik Schnetter, Pohang, July 2007

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

A Brane World in an Arbitrary Number of Dimensions without Z 2 Symmetry

Characteristic Numbers of Matrix Lie Algebras

Einstein Field Equations (EFE)

Week 6: Differential geometry I

Classification theorem for the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere

GLASGOW Paolo Lorenzoni

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

New first-order formulation for the Einstein equations

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Rigid Body Motion Introduction + Math Review

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 11 Oct 1994

Tailoring BKL to Loop Quantum Cosmology

Math 2030 Assignment 5 Solutions

A kappa deformed Clifford Algebra, Hopf Algebras and Quantum Gravity

Causality, hyperbolicity, and shock formation in Lovelock theories

MATH45061: SOLUTION SHEET 1 V

Tensor Analysis in Euclidean Space

Symmetry and Properties of Crystals (MSE638) Stress and Strain Tensor

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Constrained BF theory as gravity

Initial Data for Black-Hole Binaries

Homework 7-8 Solutions. Problems

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

On Berwald Spaces which Satisfy the Relation Γ k ij = p k g ij for Some Functions p k on TM

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

Getting The Spin Right In Black-Hole Binaries

Chern-Simons theory and three-dimensional surfaces

Special Theory of Relativity

221A Miscellaneous Notes Continuity Equation

Citation for published version (APA): Halbersma, R. S. (2002). Geometry of strings and branes. Groningen: s.n.

1. Basic Operations Consider two vectors a (1, 4, 6) and b (2, 0, 4), where the components have been expressed in a given orthonormal basis.

Kadath: a spectral solver and its application to black hole spacetimes

Tensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2

The Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation Revisited

On the evolutionary form of the constraints in electrodynamics

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 8 Nov 2005 Robert B. Mann

L8. Basic concepts of stress and equilibrium

Cosmology. April 13, 2015

Quintic Quasitopological Gravity

1.4 LECTURE 4. Tensors and Vector Identities

Chapter 7. Kinematics. 7.1 Tensor fields

A Numerical Study of Boson Star Binaries

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 3

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture I

How to recognize a conformally Kähler metric

Status of Hořava Gravity

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Recovering General Relativity from Hořava Theory

Bondi mass of Einstein-Maxwell-Klein-Gordon spacetimes

Elastic Fields of Dislocations in Anisotropic Media

16.21 Techniques of Structural Analysis and Design Spring 2003 Unit #5 - Constitutive Equations

ON TOTALLY REAL SUBMANIFOLDS IN A NEARLY KÄHLER MANIFOLD *

Hyperbolic Geometric Flow

Generalized Harmonic Coordinates Using Abigel

arxiv: v5 [gr-qc] 29 Aug 2008

Boundary conditions for the Einstein evolution system

Proper curvature collineations in Bianchi type-ii space-times( )

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 12 Jul 1994

1 Index Gymnastics and Einstein Convention

Light Propagation in the Averaged Universe. arxiv:

Geometry of General Hypersurfaces in Spacetime: Junction Conditions.

A non-strictly hyperbolic system for the Einstein equations with arbitrary lapse and shift

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 19 Nov 2004

Yangians In Deformed Super Yang-Mills Theories

The mathematical validity of the f (r) theory of modified gravity

Initial-Value Problems in General Relativity

RIGIDITY OF STATIONARY BLACK HOLES WITH SMALL ANGULAR MOMENTUM ON THE HORIZON

Transcription:

Introduction to Numerical Relativity Given a manifold M describing a spacetime with 4-metric we want to foliate it via space-like, threedimensional hypersurfaces: {Σ i }. We label such hypersurfaces with the time coordinate t, Σ t. We define the 1-form Ω a = a t, (1) with the normalization Ω 2 = g ab a t b t = 1 α 2, (2) Thefunctionαiscalledthelapsefunctionanditisstrictlypositiveforspacelikehypersurfacesα(t,x i ) > 0. We define also the unit normal vector to the hypersurface Σ t n a = αg ab Ω b = αg ab b t. (3) The sign is chosen so that the related unit vector is future directed. i.e. n a n a = 1, n a can be viewed as the four velocity of an observer moving orthogonally to the hypersurfaces of Σ t Such an observer will have a four-acceleration, a b a b = n a a n b, (4) With the above vector we can construct the spatial metric induced on the 3 dimensional hypersurface The inverse can be found by raising the indices with g ab γ ab = g ab +n a n b, (5) γ ab = g ac g bd γ cd = g ab +n a n b, (6) The metric γ ab is purely spatial, lives within the hypersurface. Its contraction with the normal vector is zero n a γ ab = n a g ab +n a n a n b = n b n b = 0. (7) The projector operator projects a 4-dimensional tensor into a spatial slice, γ a b = g a b +n a n b, (8) in particular the projection of an arbitrary4-vector v a, γ a bv b is purely spatial. In order to project tensors of higher rank, each free index has to be contracted with the projection operator. Sometimes the notation is used in the literature. Any tensor can be decomposed into its spatial and timelike parts, T ab = γ a c γ b d T cd, (9) v a = δ a bv b = (γ a b n a n b )v b = v a n a n b v b, (10) T ab = T ab n a n c T cb n b n c T ac +n a n b n c n d T cd. (11) 1

We will need a 3-dimensional covariant derivative D a that maps spatial tensors into spatial tensors. We also require that this covariant derivate must be compatible with the induced metric, D c γ ab = 0. For a scalar function this derivate is defined as D a f = γ b a bf, (12) and for a spacetime tensor: D a T b c = γ d aγ b eγ f c d T e f, (13) then D c γ ab = γ d cγ f aγ g b d γ fg = γ d cγ f aγ g b d (g fg +n f n g ) = γ d cγ f aγ g b(n f d n g +n g d n f ) = 0, where we have used property (7) and the compatibility of g ab with the 4-covariant derivative. Extrinsic curvature The extrinsic curvature, can be found projecting gradients of the normal vector on Σ t. K ab = γ c aγ d b c n d = γ c aγ d b (c n d) (14) also, it can be writen as K ab = γ c aγ d b c n d = (δ c a +n c n a )(δ d b +n d n b ) c n d = (δ c a +n a n c )δ d b c n d = a n b n a a b. Perhaps the most useful expression is K ab = 1 2 L nγ ab = ( a n b +n a n d d n b ). (15) Gauss-Codazzi equations Let us consider the definition of 3d Riemann tensor, acting on a pure spatial vector (D i D j D j D i )ω k = 3 R l ijk ω l. (16) Using the defintion of 3d covariant derivative D i D j ω k = γi a γb j γc k a(γb l γm c lω m ) = γi a γjγ b k c a b ω c +γi a γjγ b k m ( a γb)( l l ω m )+γiγ a jγ l k( c a γc m )( l ω m ) = γi a γb j γc k a b ω c γk m (nl l ω m )K ij K ik Kj c ω c, To prove the last equality, let us consider first c γ b a = c(g b a +n an b ) = c (n a n b ) = n a c n b +n b c n a = n a (K b c +n c D b lnα) n b (K ac +n c D a lnα) 2

Consequently γ c iγ a j c γ b a = n b K ij, (17) and the contraction in second term of the right hand side γ a i γb j ( aγ l b ) = nl K ij. Secondly, since ω a is purely spatial n a ω a = 0 we rewrote the third term in the second line as Finally (D i D j D j D i )ω k gives γ l j nm l ω m = γ l j ω m l n m = ω m K m j. (18) 3 R ijk l ω l = γ a iγ b jγ c kr abc l ω l ω l K l j K ik +ω l K il K jk. (19) Then we have the Gauss Codazzi equations 3 R ijkl = γ a iγ b jγ c kγ d lr abcd +K il K jk K ik K jl, (20) Hamiltonian constraint if we contract Eq. (20) with γ ik 3 R jl = γ b j γd l (R bd +n a n c R abcd )+K jk K k l KK jl, (21) where we have used γ ac = g ac +n a n c. Multipliying again with γ jl 3 R = (R+2R ad n a n d )+K il K il K 2, (22) Notice that if we use Einstein s equations R+2R ad n a n d = 2G ad n a n d = 16πT ad n a n d, (23) in the previous formula we get ρ = T ad n a n d 3 R+K 2 K il K il = 16πρ, (24) which is known as the Hamiltonian constraint. Momentum constraint Let us consider other projections D i D j n k = γi a γb j γk c ad b n c = γi a γb j γk c a(γb d γc e dn e ) = γi a γjγ b c k a b n c +γiγ a jγ b c( k a γb) d d n c +γi a γjγ b c( k a γe) c b n e = γi a γb j γk c a b n c γc k K ijn d d n c γj b Kk i n e b n e = γi a γjγ b c k a b n c (D k lnα)k ij where we have used D c lnα = n d d n c and n e b n e = 0. Then if we rename the index k i D i D j n k = γ a i γb j γk c a b n c (D k lnα)k ij (25) D i D j n i = γ a cγ b j a b n c (D i lnα)k ij, (26) 3

or k j and i j to keep the index i on n i D j D i n i = γj a γb c a b n c (D i lnα)k ij, (27) we can construct the Riemann tensor using the nonconmutativity of ( a b b a ) as D i D j n i D j D i n i = γcγ a j( b a b b a )n c = γcγ a jr b c abd n d = R bd γjn b d (28) Taking into account that D i n i = K and D j n i = K i j we get D i Kj i D jk = R bd γj b nd, (29) Using the projected Eintein s equation R bd γj bnd = 8πT bd γj bnd. We get the Momentum constraint. D i Kj i D jk = 8πS j (30) where we have defined S j = T bd γj b. Evolution of the extrinsic curvature From the contaction of the Gauss-Codazzi equations (21) 3 R jl = γjγ b l d (R bd +n a n c R abcd )+K il Kj i KK jl, (31) the term that involves n a n c R abcd contains second time derivatives of the metric. Let us consider R abcd n d = ( a b b a )n c (32) and a b n c = a ( K bc n b D c lnα) (33) = a K bc +(K ab +n a D b lnα)d c lnα n b a D c lnα (34) where we have used b n c = K bc n b D c lnα. Thus the projection of R abcd n d = ( a b b a )n c γjγ b l d n a n c R abcd = γjγ a ln c b n d R abcd = γjγ a ln c b ( a K bc + b K ac )+(D j lnα)d l lnα+d j D l lnα. (35) The first term of the right hand side of the last expression can be rewritten as γjγ a ln c b a K bc = γjk a bl a n b = γjk a bl (Ka b +n a D b lnα) = K kl Kj k, (36) and the second term γj a γc l nb b K ac = γj a γc l (L nk bc K ab c n b K bc a n b ) = L n K jl +2K jk Kl k, (37) hence we can write the contraction as γj a γc l R abcdn b n d = L n K jl +K jk Kl k + 1 α D jd l α. (38) Let us go back to the term γi bγd j R bd. Using the Einstein s equations γ b iγ d jr bd = 8πγ b iγ d j(t bd 1 2 g bdt). (39) 4

Let us consider the second term g bd g ef T ef γiγ b j d = (γ ef n e n f )γ di γjt d ef (40) = (γ ef n e n f )γ ij T ef (41) = γ ef γ ij T ef γ ij ρ (42) = γ ij (S ρ), (43) with S = γ ij S ij = γ ij γi e γf j T ef = γ ef T ef, S ij = γi c γd j T cd, (44) From the Gauss Codazzi equation (21) 3 R jl = γjγ b l d R bd + 1 α D jd l α+l n K jl +2K kl Kj k KK jl (45) and using γ b jγ d l R bd = 8π[S jl 1 2 γ jl(s ρ)], (46) we have the evolution for K jl L n K jl = 3 R jl 1 α D jd l α+2k kl K k j KK jl 8π[S jl 1 2 γ jl(s ρ)]. (47) 5