Phys. 506 Electricity and Magnetism Winter 2004 Prof. G. Raithel Problem Set 5 Total 40 Points. 1. Problem Points

Similar documents
Scattering. March 20, 2016

Physics 506 Winter 2004

Physics 506 Winter 2006 Homework Assignment #6 Solutions

Physics 506 Winter 2008 Homework Assignment #4 Solutions. Textbook problems: Ch. 9: 9.6, 9.11, 9.16, 9.17

EITN90 Radar and Remote Sensing Lecture 5: Target Reflectivity

Atomic cross sections

Electromagnetism: Worked Examples. University of Oxford Second Year, Part A2

EM radiation - Lecture 14

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Electrodynamics Exam Solutions

Propagation of EM Waves in material media

I. Rayleigh Scattering. EE Lecture 4. II. Dipole interpretation

Physics 214 Midterm Exam Solutions Winter 2017

2nd Year Electromagnetism 2012:.Exam Practice

Scattering. 1 Classical scattering of a charged particle (Rutherford Scattering)

Dipole Approxima7on Thomson ScaEering

PHYS 110B - HW #5 Fall 2005, Solutions by David Pace Equations referenced equations are from Griffiths Problem statements are paraphrased

Maxwell s equations for electrostatics

Problem Set 10 Solutions

FORMULA SHEET FOR QUIZ 2 Exam Date: November 8, 2017

Lecture 10 February 25, 2010

Physics 214 Final Exam Solutions Winter 2017

Physics 505 Fall 2005 Homework Assignment #7 Solutions

Fiber Optics. Equivalently θ < θ max = cos 1 (n 0 /n 1 ). This is geometrical optics. Needs λ a. Two kinds of fibers:

Physics 505 Homework No. 12 Solutions S12-1

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

Summary: Applications of Gauss Law

Physics 505 Fall Homework Assignment #9 Solutions

Physics 504, Lecture 22 April 19, Frequency and Angular Distribution

Queen s University at Kingston. Faculty of Arts and Science. Department of Physics PHYSICS 106. Final Examination.

Homework Assignment 4 Solution Set

PHY481 - Outline of solutions to Homework 3

Electrodynamics I Midterm - Part A - Closed Book KSU 2005/10/17 Electro Dynamic

Solutions to PS 2 Physics 201

Department of Physics IIT Kanpur, Semester II,

Classical Scattering

Magnetostatics III Magnetic Vector Potential (Griffiths Chapter 5: Section 4)

Optical Imaging Chapter 5 Light Scattering

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Phys. 505 Electricity and Magnetism Fall 2003 Prof. G. Raithel Problem Set 1

PC4262 Remote Sensing Scattering and Absorption

221B Lecture Notes Scattering Theory II

Solution Set of Homework # 2. Friday, September 09, 2017

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

Electrodynamics I Final Exam - Part A - Closed Book KSU 2005/12/12 Electro Dynamic

EECS 117. Lecture 22: Poynting s Theorem and Normal Incidence. Prof. Niknejad. University of California, Berkeley

Total Internal Reflection & Metal Mirrors

Theory of Electromagnetic Fields

Electromagnetic Field Theory (EMT)

Topic 7. Electric flux Gauss s Law Divergence of E Application of Gauss Law Curl of E

Problem Set #4: 4.1,4.7,4.9 (Due Monday, March 25th)

Field Theory exam II Solutions

1 Electromagnetic concepts useful for radar applications

Electromagnetic Theorems

Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field

Joel A. Shapiro January 21, 2010

Guided waves - Lecture 11

Physics 511 Spring 2000

Problem set 3. Electromagnetic waves

Lecture 8 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II Dr. Christopher S. Baird, faculty.uml.edu/cbaird University of Massachusetts Lowell

EECS 117. Lecture 23: Oblique Incidence and Reflection. Prof. Niknejad. University of California, Berkeley

Solution Set Eight. 1 Problem #1: Toroidal Electromagnet with Gap Problem #4: Self-Inductance of a Long Solenoid. 9

Chapter 9. Electromagnetic waves

Physics 7B, Speliotopoulos Final Exam, Fall 2014 Berkeley, CA

2.1 The electric field outside a charged sphere is the same as for a point source, E(r) =

Chapter 27 Sources of Magnetic Field

PHY752, Fall 2016, Assigned Problems

Quantum Mechanics II

Make sure you show all your work and justify your answers in order to get full credit.

Radiative heat transfer

Ph304 Final Examination Electrodynamics

E&M. 1 Capacitors. January 2009

MULTIVARIABLE INTEGRATION

Solutions Mock Examination

PHYSICS 7B, Section 1 Fall 2013 Midterm 2, C. Bordel Monday, November 4, pm-9pm. Make sure you show your work!

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 4 Nature of the nuclear force. Reminder: Investigate

On Electromagnetic-Acoustic Analogies in Energetic Relations for Waves Interacting with Material Surfaces

AN EXPRESSION FOR THE RADAR CROSS SECTION COMPUTATION OF AN ELECTRICALLY LARGE PERFECT CONDUCTING CYLINDER LOCATED OVER A DIELECTRIC HALF-SPACE

Oh, the humanity! David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Spherical Waves. Daniel S. Weile. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Delaware. ELEG 648 Spherical Coordinates

PHYS General Physics for Engineering II FIRST MIDTERM

xy 2 e 2z dx dy dz = 8 3 (1 e 4 ) = 2.62 mc. 12 x2 y 3 e 2z 2 m 2 m 2 m Figure P4.1: Cube of Problem 4.1.

Quiz 4 (Discussion Session) Phys 1302W.400 Spring 2018

NYU Physics Preliminary Examination in Electricity & Magnetism Fall 2011

So far, we have considered three basic classes of antennas electrically small, resonant

Fundamental Stellar Parameters

Question 1: Some algebra

7 Curvilinear coordinates

Physics 505 Electricity and Magnetism Fall 2003 Prof. G. Raithel. Problem Set 3. 2 (x x ) 2 + (y y ) 2 + (z + z ) 2

RADIATION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES

Fundamentals on light scattering, absorption and thermal radiation, and its relation to the vector radiative transfer equation

Continuum Polarization Induced by Tidal Distortion in Binary Stars

1. Consider the biconvex thick lens shown in the figure below, made from transparent material with index n and thickness L.

Chapter 3-Elastic Scattering Small-Angle, Elastic Scattering from Atoms Head-On Elastic Collision in 1-D

(b) For the system in question, the electric field E, the displacement D, and the polarization P = D ɛ 0 E are as follows. r2 0 inside the sphere,

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA CRUZ DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS PHYS 110A. Homework #7. Benjamin Stahl. March 3, 2015

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

1. Reflection and Refraction of Spherical Waves

Transcription:

Phys. 56 Electricity and Magnetism Winter 4 Prof. G. Raithel Problem Set 5 Total 4 Points. Problem. Points The partial-wave analysis presented in Chapter.4 applied to the case of a perfectly conducting sphere with radius ka leads to the result stated in Eq..7, which applies to incident electric fields of either ɛ + (upper sign or ɛ polarization (lower sign, dω = π a (ka 4 X,± iˆn X,± ( The scattering cross section equals the radiated power per solid angle divided by the incident intensity, dω = dp sc dω /I inc = r E sc E sc/e E where E sc and E are the scattered and incident electric fields, respectively. Thus, up to a pre-factor including exp(ikr/r the term X,± iˆn X,± represents the scattered electric field in the radiation zone for the case of either clean ɛ + or ɛ polarizations. Based on the superposition principle, for an incident field with a unit polarization vector ɛ = + r (ɛ + + r exp(iαɛ ( the scattered electric field is obtained via a corresponding coherent superposition of the scattered fields of ɛ + and ɛ polarizations. Thus, for the incident polarization of Eq. the scattering cross section is dω = π a (ka 4 + r X, iˆn X, ] + r exp(iα X, + iˆn X, ] = : π a (ka 4 + r F Using that X l,m = ˆL = i l(l + ˆLYlm ( ˆφ θ ˆθ sin θ φ Y,± = sin θ exp(±iφ 8π it is found that

( ˆφ X,± = cos θ ˆθ exp(±iφ 6π i Inserting into Eq. we find, with ˆn ˆθ = ˆφ and ˆn ˆφ = ˆθ, that the components of the transverse field ˆF are F θ = F φ = exp(iφ( cos θ + r exp( iφ + iα( cos θ] 6π i exp(iφ(cos θ + ir exp( iφ + iα( cos θ] 6π and dω = π a (ka 4 + r (F θf θ + F φ F φ = = k 4 a 6 8( + r k 4 a 6 8( + r ( cos θ ( + r + r cos(π α + ( cos θ ( + r r cos(φ α ] ( + r (5( + cos θ 8 cos θ + r cos(φ α( cos θ ] = k 4 a 6 5 8 ( + cos θ cos θ ] r 4( + r sin θ cos(φ α q.e.d. A more basic but cumbersome approach is to calculate the scattered electric field in the far zone, ( E sc = k exp(ikr (ˆn p + Z m ˆn 4π r ɛ for the electric and magnetic dipoles p = 4πɛ a E in and m = π µ a B in induced by an incident field with k-vector k = kẑ E in = E + r (ɛ + + r exp(iαɛ B in = c ẑ E in. The scattering cross section follows from an elementary calculation of dω = r E sc E sc E in E in

. Problem. Points a: Since the skin depth is much smaller than the radius, δ R, the magnetic field does not penetrate significantly into the sphere. Also, since kr, the magnetic field in the vicinity of the sphere is essentially static (near-field limit. Because of both these facts, the H-field in the vicinity of the sphere is obtained by considering a sphere with radius R and µ = in an external homogeneous magnetic field H. Due to the absence of free currents in this model, the magnetostatic potential may be used. We first assume a magnetic field H in the z-direction. The magnetic potentials inside and outside the sphere are then of the form Φ i = l Φ o = l a l r l P l (cos θ b l r l P l (cos θ H rp (cos θ where the second term in the last equation is added to match the boundary condition H(r = Φ o (r = H = H ẑ The radial boundary condition on the surface is µh r,i = = µ H r,o, i.e. yielding b l = for l and = µ b l ( l R l P l H P l b = R H. The θ-boundary condition on the surface is H r,i = H r,o, i.e. l a l R l P l = l b l R l P l H P. With the previous result for the b l, we find a l = for l, and a = H. Result inside: Φ i = H r cos θ H r,i = H cos θ H θ,i = H sin θ B r,i = B θ,i =

Result outside: ( R Φ o = r + r H cos θ H r,o = ( R r + H cos θ ( R H θ,o = r + H sin θ ( B r,o = µ R r + H cos θ ( R B θ,o = µ r + H sin θ Immediately outside the surface, H r,s = and H θ,s = H sin θ. These results hold for the specialized case of H = H ẑ; in this case, all φ-components of the fields are zero. Also, from the form of Φ o it is seen that the outside field equals H plus that of a magnetic dipole with moment m = πr H. Next, we consider the field for general polarization. The outside field in the near zone equals H plus the field of a magnetic dipole m = πr H. Based on the superposition principle, we can - without further analysis - state that for a magnetic field H of the general form H = H ɛ H = H ˆk ɛ the induced magnetic moment is m = πr H ɛ H There, ɛ H is the polarization vector of the magnetic field of the incident wave, ɛ the (usual polarization vector of the electric field, and ˆk a unit vector in the direction of propagation of the incident wave. In a linear-polarization basis, a general polarization state is characterized by the equivalent forms ɛ = c ɛ + c ɛ ɛ H = c ɛ c ɛ, where c c + c c =. The magnetic field in the near-zone outside the sphere then is H = ] ˆn(ˆn m m 4πr + H ɛ H = R r (ˆn(ˆn ɛ H ɛ H + ɛ H H where ˆn is a radial unit vector. The surface field H s is obtained by setting r = R, H s = H ɛ H ˆn(ˆn ɛ H ] As a test, we can verify that this field is entirely tangential by seeing that ˆn H s =.

b: The absorbed power equals, by Eq. 8.5 of Jackson, P abs = σδ = R σδ ˆn H da = R σδ 9 H 4 = H R π σδ Since the incident intensity H s H sd cos θdφ ɛ H ˆn(ˆn ɛ H ] ɛ H ˆn(ˆn ɛ H] dω ɛ H ɛ H ˆn ɛ H ] dω 4π c c ˆn ɛ dω c c 4π c c 4π 4π c c 4π 4π (c c + c c 4π 4π ] + Re (c c ] ( ] ˆn ɛ dω + Re c c (ˆn ɛ (ˆn ɛ dω ] I in = Z E E = Z H H = Z H ɛ H ɛ H = Z H the absorption cross section is σ abs = P abs I in = 6R π Z σδ = 6R π µ ω Z σ = ɛ ω 6R π σ ω We find that P abs and σ abs are independent of the polarization state of the incident wave. Therefore, the results also apply for unpolarized light.

. Problem.8 Points a: According to Eq. 8. of Jackson, the tangential electric and magnetic fields on the surface of a non-ideal conductor with µ = µ follow E tan = µ ω σ ( i(ˆn H µ ω tan = ( i(ˆn H σ This is of the form of Eq..64, E tan = Z s (ˆn H with surface impedance µc ω Z s = σ ( i = Z kδ ( i, where we have used the skin depth δ = µ σω. b: The long-wavelength limit for l = is obtained from Eq..69 (set x = ka: α ± ( i(ka ( ka i kδ ( i ka + i kδ ( i = i(ka ( ( δ a i δ a ( + δ a + i δ a q.e.d. β ± ( i(ka ( ka i kδ( i ka + i kδ( i Since kδ < ka and, consequently, kδ, we can drop the ka in the large parentheses, and β ± ( i(ka ( i kδ( i = 4i(ka i kδ( i q.e.d. c: With X,± = 6π ( ˆφ cos θ ˆθ exp(±iφ i t := ( δ a i δ a ( + δ a + i δ a and ˆn ˆθ = ˆφ and ˆn ˆφ = ˆθ, from Eq..6 it follows for the given case

dω = π k αx,± ± iβˆn X,± = π 4(ka 6 k 9 = π 4(ka 6 k 9 = (ka6 8k tx,± ± iβˆn X,± ] 6π ± ˆφ t cos θ + i + i ˆθ t + cos θ] (t cos θ (t cos θ + (t cos θ(t cos θ] = (ka6 8k (tt + 4( + cos θ 4(t + t cos θ ] In first order of δ a, we find tt = δ a and t + t = Re(t = δ a. Thus, dω = (ka6 8k (5 δ a ( + cos θ 4( δ ] a cos θ As a quick test we note that the result agrees with Eq..7 in the limit δ. d: According to Eq..6, in the limit that only l = is important, as in the given case, the total absorption cross section is σ abs = π k ( αα ββ Re(α + β The terms αα and ββ are of order (ka 6. The term Re(β =, and the term Re(α is of order (ka. Thus, the only term of importance is Re(α, Re(α = (ka (ka ( δ a ( + δ a δ a ( δ a ( + δ ( δ a a + δ 4a = (ka δ a ( where the last line is valid for δ a. Thus, in first order of δ it is σ abs = π k (ka δ a = πkδa q.e.d. For δ = a we use the first line of Eq. to find Re(α = 5 (ka, and σ abs (δ = a = πka 5 This is only 4% of the result that would follow from the equation valid for δ a. Also, note that one cannot expect the underlying analysis of Chapter 8. to be very accurate for δ = a.

4. Problem.9a Points For ɛ r close to, we can use the Born approximation. For the given case, the normalized polarization-resolved scattering amplitude in Born approximation is, ɛ A sc D = k 4π (ɛ r ɛ ɛ exp(iq x d x r<a The integral r<a exp(iq x d x = a = 4π r a exp(iqr cos θ dω ] dr = π r sin(qr qr dr = 4π q qa z sin zdz = 4π q (sin(qa qa cos(qa = j (qa 4πa qa a r exp(iqr cos θ d cos θ ] dr Thus, ɛ A sc D = k (ɛ r ɛ ɛ a j (qa qa, and dω (ɛ, ɛ = ɛ A sc D = k 4 a 6 (ɛ r j (qa qa ɛ ɛ Averaging over the incident and summing over the exit polarizations leads to dω = k4 a 6 (ɛ r j (qa qa ( + cos θ (see Chapter. and lecture. We note that by the law of cosines it is q = k ( cos θ, where θ is the scattering angle. Trends. For ka, qa = ka ( cos θ also tends to be. This limit applies in all cases except for θ less than a critical value ka. The critical angle θ c = ka corresponds to a small forward-scattering cone π π with solid angle k a, in which the limit qa does not apply. However, for ka the solid angle k a will be negligibly small, and can be ignored. For an estimate, we may thus assume qa for all θ. Since for large qa = x it is j (x x sin(x π/, the following approximate scaling applies: j (qa qa (qa = (qa 4 Thus, the scattering cross section approximately scales as dω a ( 4 k q

and is clearly peaked at small q, corresponding to scattering in forward directions. Consequently, in the integral for the total scattering cross section we may set cos θ = and get σ = dω dω = k4 a 6 (ɛ r j (qa qa ( + cos θdω k 4 a 6 (ɛ r j (qa qa dω Also, with q = k ( cos θ it is σ πk 4 a 6 (ɛ r j (qa qa k q dq d cos θ = k q and k dq = πk a 4 (ɛ r k j(qa ka dq = πk a 4 (ɛ r q j(x x d(x Since for large x the scaling of j (x x range to infinity, is x, for the purpose of an estimate we may extend the integration σ πk a 4 (ɛ r σ π k a 4 (ɛ r q.e.d j (x x d(x = πk a 4 (ɛ r 4