KNOT POLYNOMIALS. ttp://knotebook.org (ITEP) September 21, ITEP, Moscow. September 21, / 73

Similar documents
Cabling Procedure for the HOMFLY Polynomials

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 21 Jan 2012

Knot polynomials, homological invariants & topological strings

Knot Contact Homology, Chern-Simons Theory, and Topological Strings

A brief Incursion into Knot Theory. Trinity University

Vassiliev Invariants, Chord Diagrams, and Jacobi Diagrams

Knots and Physics. Lifang Xia. Dec 12, 2012

(Quantum) Super-A-polynomial

Polynomials in knot theory. Rama Mishra. January 10, 2012

Knots-quivers correspondence, lattice paths, and rational knots

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(2)

Knot Floer Homology and the Genera of Torus Knots

Non-abelian statistics

Flat hierarchy. Vassily O. Manturov (Moscow)

A topological description of colored Alexander invariant

An Introduction to Mathematical Knots

BRAID GROUPS ALLEN YUAN. 1. Introduction. groups. Furthermore, the study of these braid groups is also both important to mathematics

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Jan 1994

Bi-partite vertex model and multi-colored link invariants

Chapter 1: Systems of Linear Equations and Matrices

RE-NORMALIZED LINK INVARIANTS FROM THE UNROLLED QUANTUM GROUP. 1. Introduction

TORUS KNOT AND MINIMAL MODEL

Introduction to Group Theory

A REAPPEARENCE OF WHEELS

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 6 Jan 2018

Review of Linear Algebra Definitions, Change of Basis, Trace, Spectral Theorem

Research Statement Katherine Walsh October 2013

Hyperbolic Knots and the Volume Conjecture II: Khov. II: Khovanov Homology

Homological representation formula of some quantum sl 2 invariants

Refined Chern-Simons Theory, Topological Strings and Knot Homology

Advancement to Candidacy. Patterns in the Coefficients of the Colored Jones Polynomial. Katie Walsh Advisor: Justin Roberts

RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS The state sum invariant of 3-manifolds constructed from the E 6 linear skein.

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 4 May 2018

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

Topological Quantum Computation from non-abelian anyons

AdS/CFT Beyond the Planar Limit

A Survey of Quantum Enhancements

Knot Homology from Refined Chern-Simons Theory

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Hidden structures of knot invariants Sleptsov, A. Link to publication

Do Super Cats Make Odd Knots?

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 2 Mar 2015

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 15 Mar 2017

Towards a modular functor from quantum higher Teichmüller theory

Figure 1 C =, KT =. Figure 2

Generalised Rogers Ramanujan identities and arithmetics. Ole Warnaar School of Mathematics and Physics

Translation Symmetry, Space Groups, Bloch functions, Fermi energy

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

A NOTE ON TENSOR CATEGORIES OF LIE TYPE E 9

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

Practice Final Exam Solutions for Calculus II, Math 1502, December 5, 2013

The geometrical semantics of algebraic quantum mechanics

Super-A-polynomials of Twist Knots

Quantum Groups and Link Invariants

Spectra of Semidirect Products of Cyclic Groups

DESSINS D ENFANTS OF TRIGONAL CURVES MEHMET EMIN AKTAŞ. 1. Introduction

MASTERS EXAMINATION IN MATHEMATICS SOLUTIONS

Mapping Class Groups MSRI, Fall 2007 Day 2, September 6

The six vertex model is an example of a lattice model in statistical mechanics. The data are

The Image of Weyl Group Translations in Hecke Algebras

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 8 May 1999

External Littelmann Paths of Kashiwara Crystals of Type A ran

Power sums and Homfly skein theory

Tridiagonal pairs in algebraic graph theory

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Spring Semester 2015

Solutions Parabola Volume 49, Issue 2 (2013)

Littlewood Richardson polynomials

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

Part II. Riemann Surfaces. Year

FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS AND THE VAN KAMPEN S THEOREM

Quasi-Trees and Khovanov homology

Reference Material /Formulas for Pre-Calculus CP/ H Summer Packet

MSRI, subfactors, knots and the development of quantum topology.

Detailed Proof of The PerronFrobenius Theorem

Matrix-tree theorems and the Alexander-Conway polynomial

Laplacians of Graphs, Spectra and Laplacian polynomials

A. Incorrect! Apply the rational root test to determine if any rational roots exist.

EE731 Lecture Notes: Matrix Computations for Signal Processing

: Error Correcting Codes. October 2017 Lecture 1

Classification of root systems

Invariance of tautological equations

Is the Universe Uniquely Determined by Invariance Under Quantisation?

Differential Topology Final Exam With Solutions

ON AN INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OVER A FINITE FIELD. A. M. Vershik, S. V. Kerov

Figure 1 The term mutant was coined by Conway, and refers to the following general construction.

(x 1, y 1 ) = (x 2, y 2 ) if and only if x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2.

= A + A 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) 2 n 2. n = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. = ( A 2 A 2 ) n 1. We start with the skein relation for one crossing of the trefoil, which gives:

Test Codes : MIA (Objective Type) and MIB (Short Answer Type) 2007

Local unitary representations of the braid group and their applications to quantum computing

Realizing non-abelian statistics in quantum loop models

Bipartite knots. S. Duzhin, M. Shkolnikov

Quantum Symmetries in Free Probability Theory. Roland Speicher Queen s University Kingston, Canada

A Field Extension as a Vector Space

Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

A NOTE ON QUANTUM 3-MANIFOLD INVARIANTS AND HYPERBOLIC VOLUME

Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory

On some combinatorial aspects of Representation Theory

arxiv: v2 [math.gt] 15 Nov 2017

Knot Invariants and Chern-Simons Theory

Kai Sun. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Collaborators: Krishna Kumar and Eduardo Fradkin (UIUC)

Transcription:

http://knotebook.org ITEP, Moscow September 21, 2015 ttp://knotebook.org (ITEP) September 21, 2015 1 / 73

H K R (q A) A=q N = Tr R P exp A K SU(N) September 21, 2015 2 / 73

S = κ 4π d 3 x Tr (AdA + 2 ) 3 A3 q = exp 2πi κ + N September 21, 2015 3 / 73

Can be lifted to extended polynomials H B R{q p k } which depend on infinitely many time-variables {p k } and on particular braid representation B of the oriented knot K. September 21, 2015 4 / 73

H K R (q A) H B R{q p k} p k = Ak A k q k q k At this topological locus the r.h.s. does not depend on the choice of B for a given K. September 21, 2015 5 / 73

Character expansion separates dependencies on the braid and the time variables: HR{q p B k } = crq(q)s B Q {p k } Q m R Sum is over Young diagrams Q of the size Q = m R September 21, 2015 6 / 73

More artful character expansions (especially in the Hall-Littlewood or MacDonald polynomials) can be even more useful for particular applications September 21, 2015 7 / 73

An m-strand braid is parameterized by a sequence of integers a (j) i with i = 1, 2,..., m 1 and j = 1,..., n a (1) 1 = 2, a (1) 2 = 2, a (2) 1 = 1, a (2) 2 = 3 (the closure is the knot 8 10 ) September 21, 2015 8 / 73

crq B (q) are represented as traces in the spaces of intertwining operators of combinations of simple matrices, c B RQ(q) = Tr Q j ( m 1 i=1 R a(j) i i,i+1 ) September 21, 2015 9 / 73

Representation is parameterized by the Young diagram: an ordered set of l(r) positive integers R = {r 1 r 2... r l(r) > 0} = [r 1, r 2,..., r l(r) ] September 21, 2015 10

Find and investigate the equations, which the HOMFLY and extended HOMFLY polynomials satisfy as functions of a (j) i and r k. September 21, 2015 11

Definition of knot polynomials Evaluation of knot polynomials Properties of knot polynomials September 21, 2015 12

Definitions/evaluation: Perturbative expansion in 1/k leads to Vassiliev invariants and to Vogel s algebra of triple-ended diagrams (related to Konnes-Kreimer formalism) September 21, 2015 13

Gauge choices quadratic actions (free field representations): A z = 0: A0 A propagator 1 z Kontsevich integral A 0 = 0: ɛab A a Ȧ b sign(t)δ (2) (z) 2d knot diagrams September 21, 2015 14

Knot diagrams: Integrable lattice theory on arbitrary graph Reidemeister invariance = YB relation R-matrix calculus Conformal blocks Hypercube method (good also for virtual knots and for superpolynomials) September 21, 2015 15

R-matrix approach: c B RQ(q) = Tr Q j ( m 1 i=1 Skein relations Û i ˆRa ij Û i ) September 21, 2015 16

R-matrix, acting in the channel [1] [1] = [2] [11] has two eigenvalues, q and 1/q, associated with the two irreducible representations [2] and [11] respectively, and thus satisfies the Hecke algebra constraint ( ) R q )(R + q 1 = 0 September 21, 2015 17

Skein relations in fund.rep.: H (... a ij+1...) H (... a ij 1...) = = ( q q 1) H (... a ij...) September 21, 2015 18

For bigger representations R, the product R R = S S and R-matrix in this channel has many different eigenvalues: as many as there are irreducible representations S in this expansion. September 21, 2015 19

These eigenvalues are equal to ɛ S q κ S, where κ S is an eigenvalue of the cut-and-join operator: Ŵ [2], associated with its eigenfunction character S S {p k }, and ɛ S = ±1, depending on R and S. Therefore, this R-matrix satisfies ( ) R ɛ S q κ S = 0 S September 21, 2015 20

S ( ) e / a ij ɛ S q κ S H (...a ij...) R = 0 for any variable a ij. September 21, 2015 21

For the first symmetric representation )( ) (R q )(R 6 + q 2 R 1 = 0 H (... a ij+3...) [2] (1+q 2 +q 6 )H (... a ij+2...) [2] + +q 2 (1+q 4 +q 6 )H (... a ij+1...) [2] q 8 H (... a ij...) [2] = September 21, 2015 22

Cabling procedure to evaluate colored polynomials: H K R m = H K m R where K m denotes m-cabling of the knot K September 21, 2015 23

HOMFLY for the l.h.s. can be presented as a sum over the irreducible representations, H K R m = S H K S To get HS K, one calculates HK m R in rep.r and then project the result onto irrep Q. September 21, 2015 24

( ) R q )(R + q 1 = 0 = P [2] = 1 + qr 1 + q 2 P [11] = q2 qr 1 + q 2 September 21, 2015 25

[1] [1] [1] = [3] + 2[21] + [111] R 3 = R 12 R 13 )( ) (R 3 q )(R 2 3 q 2 R 2 3+R 3 +1 = 0 September 21, 2015 26

P [3] = (1 q2 R 3 )(R 2 3 + R 3 + 1) (1 q 4 )(1 + q 2 + q 4 ) P [111] = q 6(R 3 q 2 )(R 2 3 + R 3 + 1) (1 q 4 )(1 + q 2 + q 4 ) September 21, 2015 27

P ± [21] = ±e±πi/6 (q 2 R 3 1)(R 3 q 2 ) 3 (R 3 e ±2πi/3 ) 1 + q 2 + q 4 September 21, 2015 28

Mixing matrixes U R 3 = R 12 R 13 = RURU R i,i+1 = sum over paths in rep.graph September 21, 2015 29

Representation graph [1] [2] [11] [3] [21] [111] [4] [31] [22] [211] [1111]... September 21, 2015 30

The multiplicity M Q of the representation Q in Q is obviously equal to the number of directed paths in the representation graph, connecting and Q. More generally, M RQ is equal to the number of directed paths between R and Q. September 21, 2015 31

The matrices ˆR i,i+1, i = 1,..., m 1 can be represented in the basis of paths between Q and and they have extremely simple form in this basis. September 21, 2015 32

First of all, with each index i of the matrix ˆR i,i+1 one associates a level i in the graph. A given path P is passing through exactly one vertex P i at level i and through some two adjacent vertices P i 1 and P i+1 at levels i 1 and i + 1. September 21, 2015 33

The structure of the representation graph is such that these P i 1 and P i+1 are connected either by a single two-segment path (singlet) (then it is a fragment of our P) or by two such paths (doublet), the segments of our path P and another path P. September 21, 2015 34

In the former case (singlet) our path P provides a diagonal element in ˆR (i) and it is equal to either q or 1/q. In the language of Young diagrams the singlet appears when the two boxes added to the diagram P i 1 in order to form P i+1 lie either in the same row, then we put q at the diagonal of ˆRi ; or in the same column, then we put 1/q. September 21, 2015 35

September 21, 2015 36

September 21, 2015 37

In the latter case (the doublet) the two boxes are neither in the same row nor in the same column, and the two paths P and P form a 2 2 block in ˆR (i). This block is described as follows. September 21, 2015 38

First, that of the paths P and P which lies to the left of the other, corresponds to the left column and to the first row of the 2 2 block. September 21, 2015 39

Second, the Young diagrams P i+1 is obtained by adding two boxes to the diagram P i 1, and the two paths correspond to doing this in two different orders, thus providing at the intermediate stage the two adjacent vertices P i and P i. September 21, 2015 40

The two added boxes are connected by a hook in the Young diagram, which has length n (measured between the centers of the two boxes). September 21, 2015 41

q n c n s n s n q n c n c n = 1 = q q 1 [n] q q n q n s n = 1 c 2 n = [n 1]q [n + 1] q [n] q September 21, 2015 42

7 n = 7 [5521] [6521] [5522] [6522] September 21, 2015 43

ALGEBRAIC PROPERTIES September 21, 2015 44

Special polynomials: H K R (q = 1 A) = ( ) R σ (A) K representations R September 21, 2015 45

exp ( H K R (q A) = ( σ K (A)) R z +l( ) 2 S ( A z 2 ) ϕ R ( ) ϕ R ( ) = symmetric-group characters Hurwitz τ-function ) September 21, 2015 46

DIFFERENTIAL EXPANSION: H K r (A, q 2 ) = 1+ {A/q} r s=1 [r]! [s]![r s]! G K s (A, q) s 1 {Aq r+j } j=0 {x} = x x 1 and [n] = {q n }/{q} September 21, 2015 47

For generic knot Gs K is a non-factorizable Laurent polynomial of A and q, but for some knots it can be further factorized. September 21, 2015 48

What is important, if Gs K is divisible by some differential {Aq k }, the same is true for all other Gs K with s > s. This property allows one to introduce defect functions νs K and µ K s = s 1 νs K : September 21, 2015 49

G K s (A, q) = F K s (A, q) ν K s 1 j=0 {Aq j } = = F K s (A, q) s 2 µ K s j=0 {Aq j } September 21, 2015 50

which are both(!) monotonically increasing function of s, ν K s ν K s, µ K s µ K s for s < s i.e. both grow but not faster than s. September 21, 2015 51

For A = q N with any fixed N, positive or negative, F s (q N, q) {q} µk s (1) i.e. at fixed N the s-the term of differential expansion is actually of the order {q} 2s. September 21, 2015 52

It turns out that νs K as a function of s has a very special shape, fully parameterized by a single integer δ K 1, which we call the defect of differential expansion: defect δ K = 1 = µ K s = s 2, ν K s = September 21, 2015 53 K K K

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 s 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314 : µ K s s 2 6 5 4 3 2 1 s 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314 September 21, 2015 54

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 s 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112131415 : µ K s 2s 3 s 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314 4 3 2 1 September 21, 2015 55

GENERALIZATIONS: H K r+m = H K r H K m q 2m =1 September 21, 2015 56

H K R+M? = H K m H K R q 2m =1 connecte provided both R and R + M are Young diagrams. The following picture is an explanation of what we mean by R + M: September 21, 2015 57

connected M of unit width discon September 21, 2015 58

Kashaev polynomial: K K R (A) = H K R ( ) q 2 = e 2πi/ R, A is the value of colored HOMFLY at a primitive root of unity q 2 R = 1. September 21, 2015 59

For all single hook diagrams R Kashaev polynomial is easily expressed through the special polynomial: K K R (A) = K K [1] (A R ) = H K [1] R = [r, 1 k ] (q 2 = 1, A R ) September 21, 2015 60

Dual to a property of colored Alexander polynomials: H K r (A = 1, q) = H K 1 (A = 1, q r ) R = [r, 1 k ] September 21, 2015 61

When A moves away from 1 concentric circles deform and collide with Alexander circles (we plot zeros of H 10 ): September 21, 2015 62

A = 1 A = 1 10 10 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 -2 September 21, 2015 63

A = 1 10 6 A = 1 10 4 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 -2 September 21, 2015 64

We can also consider perturbation in purely imaginary direction A = 1 A = 1 i 10 10 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 September 21, 2015 65-2

A = 1 i 10 6 A = 1 i 10 4 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 -2 September 21, 2015 66

For the trefoil all the roots of Alexander polynomial are unimodular. A = 1 A = 1 10 10 1.5 2 1.0 1 0.5-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5-2 -1 1 2-0.5 September 21, 2015 67-1

A = 1 10 4 A = 1 10 2 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 -2 September 21, 2015 68

and A = 1 A = 1 i 10 10 1.5 2 2 1.0 1 1 0.5-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-0.5-1 -1-1.0-1.5-2 -2 September 21, 2015 69

A = 1 i 10 2 A = 1 i 10 1 2 2 2 1 1 1-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-2 -1 1 2-1 -1-1 -2-2 -2 September 21, 2015 70

Zeroes of resultant q 2(H 4 1 1, H4 1 k ) for the figure eight knot K = 4 1 : 1.5 1.0 0.5-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5-0.5-1.0-1.5 September 21, 2015 71

September 21, 2015 72

September 21, 2015 73

THANKS FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION! September 21, 2015 74