Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations

Similar documents
The Cohomology of the Variational Bicomplex Invariant under the Symmetry Algebra of the Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation

Invariant Calculus with Vessiot

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

Invariant Variational Problems & Invariant Curve Flows

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Élie Cartan s Theory of Moving Frames

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final

MAURER CARTAN EQUATIONS FOR LIE SYMMETRY PSEUDO-GROUPS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

Equivalence, Invariants, and Symmetry

Chapter 2 Noether s First Theorem

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids

Lie algebra cohomology

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 3 Nov 2004

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Inductive and Recursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

ALGORITHMS FOR DIFFERENTIAL INVARIANTS OF SYMMETRY GROUPS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Transverse geometry. consisting of finite sums of monomials of the form

Infinite Dimensional Symmetry Groups

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

The Invariant Variational Bicomplex

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 5: DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY

B.7 Lie Groups and Differential Equations

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

Total Differentiation Under Jet Composition

1. Classifying Spaces. Classifying Spaces

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Conservation Laws: Systematic Construction, Noether s Theorem, Applications, and Symbolic Computations.

Comparison of the Weyl integration formula and the equivariant localization formula for a maximal torus of Sp(1)

Vector fields in the presence of a contact structure

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Algebraic Topology European Mathematical Society Zürich 2008 Tammo tom Dieck Georg-August-Universität

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Alexei F. Cheviakov. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. INPL seminar June 09, 2011

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Math Homotopy Theory Spring 2013 Homework 13 Solutions

A Lie-Group Approach for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Described by Implicit Ordinary Differential Equations

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 13 Feb 2008

Recursive Moving Frames for Lie Pseudo-Groups

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 25 Jul Preliminaries

COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD

Group Invariant Solutions in Mathematical Physics and Differential Geometry

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 3: TENSORS

Math Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems:

On the classification of certain curves up to projective tranformations

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky

UNIVERSAL DERIVED EQUIVALENCES OF POSETS

Deformations of Coisotropic Submanifolds of Jacobi Manifolds

On Eilenberg-MacLanes Spaces (Term paper for Math 272a)

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

On the Van Est homomorphism for Lie groupoids

Applications of Symmetries and Conservation Laws to the Study of Nonlinear Elasticity Equations

Action-angle coordinates and geometric quantization. Eva Miranda. Barcelona (EPSEB,UPC) STS Integrable Systems

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Poisson geometry of b-manifolds. Eva Miranda

Geometria Simplettica e metriche Hermitiane speciali

Derived Categories. Mistuo Hoshino

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

McGill University Department of Mathematics and Statistics. Ph.D. preliminary examination, PART A. PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Paper BETA

Moving Frame Derivation of the Fundamental Equi-Affine Differential Invariants for Level Set Functions

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Będlewo. October 19, Glenn Barnich. Physique théorique et mathématique. Université Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Orientation transport

The Canonical Contact Form

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.dg] 3 Sep 2006

Stable generalized complex structures

Dimensional Reduction of Invariant Fields and Differential Operators. II. Reduction of Invariant Differential Operators

3.1. Derivations. Let A be a commutative k-algebra. Let M be a left A-module. A derivation of A in M is a linear map D : A M such that

L6: Almost complex structures

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

A classification of equivariant gerbe connections

Let V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties:

2. Intersection Multiplicities

Characteristic Classes, Chern Classes and Applications to Intersection Theory

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

THE VARIATIONAL BICOMPLEX. Ian M. Anderson

Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed

On projective classification of plane curves

j Despite the notation, h is not the pull-back by a smooth map! In particular,

Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups

LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY

Transcription:

Group Actions and Cohomology in the Calculus of Variations JUHA POHJANPELTO Oregon State and Aalto Universities Focused Research Workshop on Exterior Differential Systems and Lie Theory Fields Institute, Toronto, Canada, December 2013

EXAMPLE: INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (PKP) equation u tx + 3 2 u xu xx + 1 4 u xxxx + 3 4 s2 u yy = 0, s 2 = ±1. Admits an infinite dimensional algebra of distinguished symmetries g PKP involving 5 arbitrary functions of time t. (David, Kamran, Levi, Winternitz, Symmetry reduction for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation using a loop algebra, J. Math. Phys. 27 (1986), 1225 1237.)

EXAMPLE: INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS Potential Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (PKP) equation u tx + 3 2 u xu xx + 1 4 u xxxx + 3 4 s2 u yy = 0, s 2 = ±1. Admits an infinite dimensional algebra of distinguished symmetries g PKP involving 5 arbitrary functions of time t. (David, Kamran, Levi, Winternitz, Symmetry reduction for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation using a loop algebra, J. Math. Phys. 27 (1986), 1225 1237.)

PKP EQUATION The symmetry algebra g PKP is spanned by the vector fields X f = f t + 2 3 yf y + (1 3 xf 2 9 s2 y 2 f ) x + ( 1 3 uf + 1 9 x 2 f 4 27 s2 xy 2 f + 4 243 y 4 f ) u, Y g = g y 2 3 s2 yg x + ( 4 9 s2 xyg + 8 81 y 3 g ) u, Z h = h x + (2 3 xh 4 9 s2 y 2 h ) u, W k = yk u, and U l = l u, where f = f (t), g = g(t), h = h(t), k = k(t) and l = l(t) are arbitrary smooth functions of t.

PKP EQUATION Locally variational with the Lagrangian L = 1 2 u tu x 1 4 u3 x + 1 8 u2 xx 3 8 s2 u 2 y. But the PKP equation admits no Lagrangian that is invariant under g PKP! To what extent do these properties characterize the PKP-equation?

PKP EQUATION Locally variational with the Lagrangian L = 1 2 u tu x 1 4 u3 x + 1 8 u2 xx 3 8 s2 u 2 y. But the PKP equation admits no Lagrangian that is invariant under g PKP! To what extent do these properties characterize the PKP-equation?

EXAMPLE: VECTOR FIELD THEORIES One-form A = A b (x i ) dx b on R m satisfying T a = T a (x i, A b, A b,i1, A b,i1 i 2,..., A b,i1 i 2 i k ) = 0, a = 1, 2,..., m. SYMMETRIES S 1 : spatial translations S 2 : Gauge transformations CONSERVATION LAWS x i x i + a i, (a i ) R m. A a (x i ) A a (x i ) + φ x a (x i ), φ C (R m ). C 1 : There are functions tj i = tj i(x i, A a, A a,i1, A a,i1 i 2,..., A a,i1 i 2 i l ) such that, for each j = 1, 2,..., m, A a,j T a = D i (t i j ). C 2 : The divergence of T a vanishes identically, D a T a = 0.

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES THEOREM (ANDERSON, P.) Suppose that the differential operator T a admits symmetries S 1, S 2 and conservation laws C 1, C 2. Then T a arises from a variational principle, T a = E a (L) for some Lagrangian L, if (i) m = 2, and T a is of third order; (ii) m 3, and T a is of second order; (iii) the functions T a are polynomials of degree at most m in the field variables A a and their derivatives. NATURAL QUESTION: Can the Lagrangian L be chosen to be invariant under [S1], [S2]?

The goal is to reduce these type of questions into algebraic problems.

VARIATIONAL BICOMPLEX Smooth fiber bundle F E π M Adapted coordinates {(x 1, x 2,..., x m, u 1, u 2,..., u p )} = {(x i, u α )} such that π(x i, u α ) = (x i ).

A local section is a smooth mapping σ : U op M E such that In adapted coordinates π σ = id. σ(x 1, x 2,..., x m ) = (x 1, x 2,..., x m, f 1 (x 1, x 2,..., x m ),..., f p (x 1, x 2,..., x m )).

INFINITE JET BUNDLE OF SECTIONS J (E) π o E π π M

INFINITE JET BUNDLE Adapted coordinates = locally J (E) {(x i, u α, u α x j 1, uα x j 1 x j 2,..., uα x j 1 x j 2 x j k,... )}. Often write u α x j 1 x j 2 x j k = uα j 1 j 2 j k = u α J, where J = (j 1, j 2,..., j k ), 1 j l m, is a multi-index.

COTANGENT BUNDLE OF J (E) Horizontal forms: dx 1, dx 2,..., dx m. Contact forms: θ α J = duα J uα Jk dx k. The space of differential forms Λ (J (E)) on J (E) splits into a direct sum of spaces of horizontal degree r and vertical (or contact) degree s: Λ (J (E)) = Λ r,s (J (E)). r,s 0 Here ω Λ r,s (J (E)) is a finite sum of terms of the form f (x i, u α, u α j,..., u α J ) dx k 1 dx kr θ α 1 L 1 θ αs L s.

COTANGENT BUNDLE OF J (E) Horizontal forms: dx 1, dx 2,..., dx m. Contact forms: θ α J = duα J uα Jk dx k. The space of differential forms Λ (J (E)) on J (E) splits into a direct sum of spaces of horizontal degree r and vertical (or contact) degree s: Λ (J (E)) = Λ r,s (J (E)). r,s 0 Here ω Λ r,s (J (E)) is a finite sum of terms of the form f (x i, u α, u α j,..., u α J ) dx k 1 dx kr θ α 1 L 1 θ αs L s.

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIFFERENTIALS The horizontal connection generated by the total derivative operators D i = is flat = x i + u α i The exterior derivative splits as where u α + uα ij 1 uj α + u α ij 1 j 2 1 uj α + 1 j 2 d = d H + d V, d H : Ω r,s Ω r+1,s, d V : Ω r,s Ω r,s+1.

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIFFERENTIALS The horizontal connection generated by the total derivative operators D i = is flat = x i + u α i The exterior derivative splits as where u α + uα ij 1 uj α + u α ij 1 j 2 1 uj α + 1 j 2 d = d H + d V, d H : Ω r,s Ω r+1,s, d V : Ω r,s Ω r,s+1.

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIFFERENTIALS m d H f (x i, u α,..., uj α ) = D j f (x i, u α,..., uj α )dx j, j=1 p d V f (x i, u α,..., uj α ) = β=1 u β K 0 K f (x i, u α,..., uj α )θβ K. d 2 = 0 = d 2 H = 0, d 2 V = 0, d Hd V + d V d H = 0.

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIFFERENTIALS m d H f (x i, u α,..., uj α ) = D j f (x i, u α,..., uj α )dx j, j=1 p d V f (x i, u α,..., uj α ) = β=1 u β K 0 K f (x i, u α,..., uj α )θβ K. d 2 = 0 = d 2 H = 0, d 2 V = 0, d Hd V + d V d H = 0.

d V d V d V d V d H d H d H 0 Λ 0,1 Λ 1,1 Λ m 1,1 Λ m,1 d V d V d V d V d H d H d H R Λ 0,0 Λ 1,0 Λ m 1,0 Λ m,0 π π π π R Λ 0 d M Λ 1 d M Λ m 1 d M Λ m M

FUNCTIONAL FORMS Define I αu β J = { δ β αδ (i 1 j 1 δ i k ) j k, if I = J, 0, otherwise. Interior Euler operator Fα I : Λ r,s Λ r,s 1, s 1, Fα(ω) I = ( ) I + J ( D) J ( α IJ I J 0 ω). Integration-by-parts operator I : Λ m,s Λ m,s, s 1, I(ω) = 1 s θα F α (ω). Spaces of functional s-forms F s = I(Λ m,s ), s 1. Differentials δ V = I d V : F s F s+1. Then δv 2 = 0.

FUNCTIONAL FORMS Define I αu β J = { δ β αδ (i 1 j 1 δ i k ) j k, if I = J, 0, otherwise. Interior Euler operator Fα I : Λ r,s Λ r,s 1, s 1, Fα(ω) I = ( ) I + J ( D) J ( α IJ I J 0 ω). Integration-by-parts operator I : Λ m,s Λ m,s, s 1, I(ω) = 1 s θα F α (ω). Spaces of functional s-forms F s = I(Λ m,s ), s 1. Differentials δ V = I d V : F s F s+1. Then δv 2 = 0.

FREE VARIATIONAL BICOMPLEX d V d V d V d V δ V d H d H d H I 0 Λ 0,2 Λ 1,2 Λ m 1,2 Λ m,2 F 2 d V d V d V d V δ V d H d H d H I 0 Λ 0,1 Λ 1,1 Λ m 1,1 Λ m,1 F 1 d V d V d V d V E d H d H d H R Λ 0,0 Λ 1,0 Λ m 1,0 Λ m,0 π π π π R Λ 0 d M Λ 1 d M Λ m 1 d M Λ m M

EULER-LAGRANGE COMPLEX Columns are locally exact Interior rows are globally exact! Horizontal homotopy operator where c I = h r,s H (ω) = 1 s I +1 n r+ I +1. I 0 c I D I [ θ α F Ij α(d j ω)], s 1,

EULER-LAGRANGE COMPLEX The edge complex R Λ 0,0 d H Λ m 1,0 d H Λ 1,0 d H d H Λ m,0 δ V F 1 δ V F 2 δ V Div E H is called the Euler-Lagrange complex E (J (E)).

CANONICAL REPRESENTATIONS Then ω = V i (x i, u [k] )( x i ν) Λ m 1,0, λ = L(x i, u [k] )ν Λ m, = α (x i, u [k] )θ α ν F 1, H = 1 2 HI αβ (x i, u [k] )θ α θ β I. λ = d H ω L = D i V i, = δ V λ α = E α (L), H = δ V H I αβ = I β α + ( 1) I E I α( β ), where E I α(f) = J 0 ( I + J ) ( D)J ( IJ I α F).

COHOMOLOGY Associated cohomology spaces: H r (E (J (E))) = ker δ V : E r E r+1 im δ V : E r 1 E r. This complex is locally exact and its cohomology H (E (J (E)) is isomorphic with the de Rham cohomology of E singular cohomology of E.

GROUP ACTIONS A Lie pseudo-group G consists a collection of local diffeomorphisms on E satisfying 1. id G; 2. If ψ 1, ψ 2 G, then ψ 1 (ψ 2 ) 1 G where defined; 3. There is k o such that the pseudo-group jets G k = {j k z ψ ψ G, z dom ψ}, k k o, form a smooth bundle. 4. A local diffeomorphism ψ G jz k ψ G k, k k o, for all z dom ψ. EXAMPLE: Symmetry groups of differential equations, gauge groups,....

The graph Γ σ E of a local section σ of E M is the set Γ σ = {σ(x i ) (x i ) dom σ}. Let ψ G. Define the transform ψ σ of σ under ψ by Γ ψ σ = ψ(γ σ ). The prolonged action of G on J (E) is then defined by j x o σ pr ψ j ψ(x o ) (ψ σ) σ ψ ψ σ

A function F defined on a G-invariant open U J (E) is called a differential invariant of G if F pr ψ = F for all ψ G. A k-form ω Λ k (U) is G invariant if (pr ψ) ω = ω for all ψ G.

The prolongation pr V of a local vector field V on E is defined by Φ V t pr Φ V t d dt V pr V A local vector field V on E is a G vector field, V g, if the flow Φ V t G for all fixed t on some interval about 0.

The prolongation pr V of a local vector field V on E is defined by Φ V t pr Φ V t d dt V pr V A local vector field V on E is a G vector field, V g, if the flow Φ V t G for all fixed t on some interval about 0.

Suppose that G consists of projectable transformations. Then the actions of G and g both preserve the spaces Λ r,s (J (E)) and commute with the horizontal and vertical differentials d H, d V, and the integration-by-parts operator I. = The differentials d H, d V, δ V map G- and g-invariant forms to G- and g-invariant forms, respectively.

g-invariant VARIATIONAL BICOMPLEX: d V d V d V d V δ V d 0 Λ 0,2 H d g Λ 1,2 H d g Λ m 1,2 H I g Λ m,2 g F 2 g d V d V d V d V δ V d 0 Λ 0,1 H d g Λ 1,1 H d g Λ m 1,1 H I g Λ m,1 g F 1 g d V d V d V d V E R Λ 0,0 g Λ 1,0 g d H d H d H Λ m 1,0 g Λ m,0 g π π π π R Λ 0 d M,g Λ 1 d M,g Λ m 1 d M,g Λ m M,g

g-invariant EULER-LAGRANGE COMPLEX E g (J (E)): R Λ 0,0 g d H Λ 1,0 g d H d H Λ m 1,0 g d H Λ m,0 g Div δ V E F 1 g δ V H F 2 g δ V Associated cohomology spaces: H r (Eg (J (E))) = ker δ V : Eg r Eg r+1 im δ V : Eg r 1. Eg r

EXACTNESS OF THE INTERIOR HORIZONTAL ROWS THEOREM Let g be a pseudo-group of projectable transformations acting on E M, and let ω i and θ α be g invariant horizontal frame and zeroth order contact frame defined on some G-invariant open set U J (E) contained in an adapted coordinate system. Then the interior rows of the g-invariant augmented variational bicomplex restricted to U are exact, H (Λ,s g (U), d H ) = {0}, s 1. COROLLARY: Under the above hypothesis H (E g (U), δ V ) = H (Λ g(u), d).

EXACTNESS OF THE INTERIOR HORIZONTAL ROWS THEOREM Let g be a pseudo-group of projectable transformations acting on E M, and let ω i and θ α be g invariant horizontal frame and zeroth order contact frame defined on some G-invariant open set U J (E) contained in an adapted coordinate system. Then the interior rows of the g-invariant augmented variational bicomplex restricted to U are exact, H (Λ,s g (U), d H ) = {0}, s 1. COROLLARY: Under the above hypothesis H (E g (U), δ V ) = H (Λ g(u), d).

COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT DESCRIPTION OF THE INVARIANT VARIATIONAL BICOMPLEX. Given a local cross section K (k) J k (E) to the action of G k on J k (E), let H k K (k) = {(g k, z k ) z k K (k), g k, z k based at the same point}, and let µ k : H k K (k) J k (E), µ k (g k, z k ) = g k z k. Then, if the action is locally free, µ k will be a G-equivariant local diffeomorphism with the action of G on H k K (k) given by ϕ (g k, z k ) = (ϕ g k, z k ).

COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES Upshot: Locally one can find a complete set of differential invariants {I α } and a coframe on U J k (E) consisting of {di α } and g-invariant 1-forms {ϑ β } such that the algebra A generated by {ϑ β } is closed under d = H g (U, d) = H (A, d). (Apply the g-equivariant homotopy I α t I α, di α t di α, ϑ β ϑ β, 0 t 1.)

GELFAND-FUKS COHOMOLOGY Formal power series vector fields on R m : { m } W m = a l x l a l R[[x 1,..., x m ]]. l=1 Lie bracket [, ]: W m W m W m. Give W m a topology relative to the ideal m =< x 1, x 2,..., x m >. Λ c(w m ): continuous alternating functionals on W m. Λ c(w m ) is generated by δ i j 1 j 2 j k, where δj i 1 j 2 j k (a l x l ) = k a i x j 1 x j 2 x j k (0).

GELFAND-FUKS COHOMOLOGY Formal power series vector fields on R m : { m } W m = a l x l a l R[[x 1,..., x m ]]. l=1 Lie bracket [, ]: W m W m W m. Give W m a topology relative to the ideal m =< x 1, x 2,..., x m >. Λ c(w m ): continuous alternating functionals on W m. Λ c(w m ) is generated by δ i j 1 j 2 j k, where δj i 1 j 2 j k (a l x l ) = k a i x j 1 x j 2 x j k (0).

GELFAND-FUKS COHOMOLOGY The differential d GF : Λ r c(w m ) Λ r+1 c (W m ) is induced by Lie bracket of vector fields so that d 2 GF = 0! d GF ω(x, Y ) = ω([x, Y ]), ω Λ 1 c(w m ). Let g o g W m be subalgebras. Define Λ c(g) = Λ c(w m ) g, Λ c(g, g o ) = {ω Λ c(g) X ω = 0, X d GF ω = 0, for all X g o }. The Gelfand-Fuks cohomology H GF (g, g o) of g relative to g o is the cohomology of the complex (Λ c(g, g o ), d GF ).

GELFAND-FUKS COHOMOLOGY The differential d GF : Λ r c(w m ) Λ r+1 c (W m ) is induced by Lie bracket of vector fields so that d 2 GF = 0! d GF ω(x, Y ) = ω([x, Y ]), ω Λ 1 c(w m ). Let g o g W m be subalgebras. Define Λ c(g) = Λ c(w m ) g, Λ c(g, g o ) = {ω Λ c(g) X ω = 0, X d GF ω = 0, for all X g o }. The Gelfand-Fuks cohomology H GF (g, g o) of g relative to g o is the cohomology of the complex (Λ c(g, g o ), d GF ).

EVALUATION MAPPING Pick σ J (E). For a given infinitesimal transformation group g acting on E, let g o = {X g pr X(σ ) = 0}. Define ρ: Λ g(j (E)) Λ c(g, g o ) by ρ(ω)(x 1,..., X r ) = ( 1) r ω(pr X 1,..., pr X r )(σ ). Then ρ is a cochain mapping, that is, it commutes with the application of d and d GF, and thus induces a mapping ρ: H (Λ g(j (E)), d) H GF (g, g o). Goal is to show that ρ is an isomorphism (moving frames!).

EVALUATION MAPPING Pick σ J (E). For a given infinitesimal transformation group g acting on E, let g o = {X g pr X(σ ) = 0}. Define ρ: Λ g(j (E)) Λ c(g, g o ) by ρ(ω)(x 1,..., X r ) = ( 1) r ω(pr X 1,..., pr X r )(σ ). Then ρ is a cochain mapping, that is, it commutes with the application of d and d GF, and thus induces a mapping ρ: H (Λ g(j (E)), d) H GF (g, g o). Goal is to show that ρ is an isomorphism (moving frames!).

EQUIVARIANT DEFORMATIONS Construct a submanifold P U J (E) such that 1. pr g acts transitively on P, and 2. P is pr g-equivariant strong deformation retract of U, that is, there is a smooth map H : U [0, 1] U such that H(σ, 0) = σ, for all σ U, H(σ, 1) P, for all σ U, H(σ, t) = σ, for all (σ, t) P [0, 1], (H t ) (pr V σ ) = pr V H(σ,t), for all V g, (σ, t) U [0, 1].

EQUIVARIANT DEFORMATIONS Under these circumstances the inclusion map ι: P U and the evaluation map ρ: Λ g(p ) Λ c(g, g o ) induce isomorphisms in cohomology.

PKP EQUATION AGAIN The symmetry algebra g PKP of the PKP equation u tx + 3 2 u xu xx + 1 4 u xxxx + 3 4 s2 u yy = 0. is spanned by the vector fields X f = f t + 2 3 yf y + (1 3 xf 2 9 s2 y 2 f ) x + ( 1 3 uf + 1 9 x 2 f 4 27 s2 xy 2 f + 4 243 y 4 f ) u, Y g = g y 2 3 s2 yg x + ( 4 9 s2 xyg + 8 81 y 3 g ) u, Z h = h x + (2 3 xh 4 9 s2 y 2 h ) u, W k = yk u, and U l = l u, where f = f (t), g = g(t), h = h(t), k = k(t) and l = l(t) are arbitrary smooth functions of t.

PKP equation Now E = {(t, x, y, u)} {(t, x, y)}. The PKP source form PKP = (u tx + 32 u xu xx + u xxxx + 34 ) s2 u yy θ dt dx dy generates non-trivial cohomology in H 4 (E gpkp (J (E)))! The characterization problem of the PKP-equation by its symmetry algebra amounts to the computation of H 4 (E g PKP (U)). For a suitable U J (U), H (E g PKP (U)) can be computed by an explicit description of differential invariants and an invariant coframe arising from the moving frames construction.

PKP equation Now E = {(t, x, y, u)} {(t, x, y)}. The PKP source form PKP = (u tx + 32 u xu xx + u xxxx + 34 ) s2 u yy θ dt dx dy generates non-trivial cohomology in H 4 (E gpkp (J (E)))! The characterization problem of the PKP-equation by its symmetry algebra amounts to the computation of H 4 (E g PKP (U)). For a suitable U J (U), H (E g PKP (U)) can be computed by an explicit description of differential invariants and an invariant coframe arising from the moving frames construction.

The Gelfand-Fuks complex for g PKP admits a basis α n, β n, γ n, υ n, ϑ n, n = 0, 1, 2,..., of invariant forms so that ( ) n dα n n = α k α n k+1, k k=0 ( ) n dβ n n {α = k β n k+1 2 k 3 αk+1 β n k}, k=0 ( ) n dγ n n {α = k γ n k+1 1 k 3 αk+1 γ n k 2 3 s2 β k β n k+1}, k=0 ( ) n+1 dυ n n + 1 {α = k υ n k+1 + 4 k 9 s2 (β k+1 γ n k+1 dϑ n = k=0 ( ) n n {α k ϑ n k+1 + 1 k 3 αk+1 ϑ n k k=0 2β k γ n k+2 ) }, + β k υ n k + 2 3 γk γ n k+1}. The complex splits into a direct sum of simultaneous eigenspaces of 2 Lie derivative operators.

The Gelfand-Fuks complex for g PKP admits a basis α n, β n, γ n, υ n, ϑ n, n = 0, 1, 2,..., of invariant forms so that ( ) n dα n n = α k α n k+1, k k=0 ( ) n dβ n n {α = k β n k+1 2 k 3 αk+1 β n k}, k=0 ( ) n dγ n n {α = k γ n k+1 1 k 3 αk+1 γ n k 2 3 s2 β k β n k+1}, k=0 ( ) n+1 dυ n n + 1 {α = k υ n k+1 + 4 k 9 s2 (β k+1 γ n k+1 dϑ n = k=0 ( ) n n {α k ϑ n k+1 + 1 k 3 αk+1 ϑ n k k=0 2β k γ n k+2 ) }, + β k υ n k + 2 3 γk γ n k+1}. The complex splits into a direct sum of simultaneous eigenspaces of 2 Lie derivative operators.

PKP EQUATION Let A be a non-vanishing differential function on some open set U J (E) satisfying pr X f (A) + 1 3 Af (t) = 0, A y = 0, for every smooth f (t), and let B be a differential function on U satisfying pr X f (B)+ 2 3 ya 1 f (t) = 0, For example, one can choose B y = 0, for every smooth f (t). A = (u x n) 1 n+1 and B = 3 2 s2 u x n 1 y (u n+2 x n) n+1, n 3, on U = {u x n > 0}.

PKP EQUATION Let A be a non-vanishing differential function on some open set U J (E) satisfying pr X f (A) + 1 3 Af (t) = 0, A y = 0, for every smooth f (t), and let B be a differential function on U satisfying pr X f (B)+ 2 3 ya 1 f (t) = 0, For example, one can choose B y = 0, for every smooth f (t). A = (u x n) 1 n+1 and B = 3 2 s2 u x n 1 y (u n+2 x n) n+1, n 3, on U = {u x n > 0}.

PKP EQUATION THEOREM Suppose that differential functions A and B, defined on an open U J (E), are chosen as above. Then the dimensions of the cohomology spaces H r (E g PKP (U), δ V ) are r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 dim 0 1 1 3 3 2 3 0

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COHOMOLOGY CLASSES Let {α 0, β 0, γ 0 } be the g PKP invariant horizontal frame defined by α 0 = A 3 dt, β 0 = A 2 dy + A 3 Bdt, γ 0 = Adx 2 3 s2 A 2 Bdy + A 3 Cdt, where C = 3 2 u xa 2 1 3 s2 B 2, and let K be the g PKP differential invariant K = (u tx + 3 4 s2 u yy + 3 2 u xu xx )A 5.

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COHOMOLOGY CLASSES Let 1, 2 E 4 g PKP (U) be the source forms 1 = (u tx + 3 2 u xu xx + 3 4 s2 u yy ) dt dx dy du, 2 = u xxxx dt dx dy du, and let 3 E 4 g PKP (U) be the source form which is the Euler-Lagrange expression 3 = E(BK α 0 β 0 γ 0 ). Then H 4 (E (U), δ V ) =< 1, 2, 3 >. Note that the PKP source form is the sum PKP = 1 + 2.

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COHOMOLOGY CLASSES Let 1, 2 E 4 g PKP (U) be the source forms 1 = (u tx + 3 2 u xu xx + 3 4 s2 u yy ) dt dx dy du, 2 = u xxxx dt dx dy du, and let 3 E 4 g PKP (U) be the source form which is the Euler-Lagrange expression 3 = E(BK α 0 β 0 γ 0 ). Then H 4 (E (U), δ V ) =< 1, 2, 3 >. Note that the PKP source form is the sum PKP = 1 + 2.

COROLLARY: Let E 4 g PKP (U) be a g PKP invariant source form that is the Euler-Lagrange expression of some Lagrangian 3-form λ E 3 (U). Then there are constants c 1, c 2, c 3 and a g PKP -invariant Lagrangian 3-form λ 0 E 3 g PKP (U) such that = c 1 1 + c 2 2 + c 3 3 + E(λ 0 ).

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES Here E = T R m = {(x i, A j )} {(x i )}. Now the infinitesimal transformation group g is spanned by T i = x i, V φ = φ,i A i, where φ is an arbitrary smooth function on R m. Need to compute H m+1 (E g (J (T R m )))! The standard horizontal homotopy operator for the free variational bicomplex commutes with the action of g = H,s (Λ, g (J (E)), d H, I) = {0}, s 1. So it suffices to compute H (Λ g(j (E)), d).

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES Here E = T R m = {(x i, A j )} {(x i )}. Now the infinitesimal transformation group g is spanned by T i = x i, V φ = φ,i A i, where φ is an arbitrary smooth function on R m. Need to compute H m+1 (E g (J (T R m )))! The standard horizontal homotopy operator for the free variational bicomplex commutes with the action of g = H,s (Λ, g (J (E)), d H, I) = {0}, s 1. So it suffices to compute H (Λ g(j (E)), d).

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES Parametrize J (T R m ) by (x i, A a, A (a,b1 ), F ab1, A (a,b1 b 2 ), F a(b1,b 2 ), A (a,b1 b 2 b 3 ), F a(b1,b 2 b 3 ),...), where F ab = A a,b A b,a. Now the variables F a(b1,b 2 b r ) are invariant under the action of g = P = { σ J (T R m ) F ij (σ ) = 0, F i(j,h) (σ ) = 0,... } is a g-equivariant strong deformation retract of J (T M) on which g acts transitively.

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES In conclusion, H (E g (J (T M))) = H GF ( g), where the Lie algebra of formal vector fields g is spanned by the vector fields T i and V j 1j 2...j k = x (j 1 x j2 x j k 1 j k ) A, j A = A j.

VECTOR FIELD THEORIES A basis for H (E g (J (T M))) is given by dx i 1 dx i k F l Λ r,0 g (J (T M)), k + 2l = r, dx i 1 dx i k F l (d V A) s F s g (J (T M)), k + 2l + s = m. (A = A i dx i, F = F ij dx i dx j.) Generators for H m+1 (E g (J (T M))) i 1i 2 i k = dx i 1 dx i 2 dx i k F l d V A, k + 2l = m 1, dim H m+1 (E g (J (T M))) = 2 m 1. Note that when m = 2r + 1, = F r d V A is the Chern-Simons mass term with components i = ɛ ij 1k 1 j 2 k 2 j r k r F j1 k 1 F j2 k 2 F jr k r.