Lecture 18: Bistable Fronts PHYS 221A, Spring 2017

Similar documents
A4. Free and Forced Oscillations

Dispersion relations, stability and linearization

Travelling waves. Chapter 8. 1 Introduction

Wave Pinning, Actin Waves, and LPA

Lecture 5: Travelling Waves

Magnetic waves in a two-component model of galactic dynamo: metastability and stochastic generation

Introduction LECTURE 1

Laurette TUCKERMAN Numerical Methods for Differential Equations in Physics

A review of stability and dynamical behaviors of differential equations:

Introduction to Partial Differential Equations

THE LOWELL LEDGER. INDEPENDENT NOT NEUTRAL. NPRAKER BLOCK SOLI)

Front Propagation. Chapter Reaction-Diffusion Systems Single component systems

MS: Nonlinear Wave Propagation in Singular Perturbed Systems

LECTURES ON PARTIAL HYPERBOLICITY AND STABLE ERGODICITY

Evans function review

Chapter 3 Second Order Linear Equations

Solitons : An Introduction

CHEM 515: Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics

Standing Waves Of Spatially Discrete Fitzhughnagumo

ANALYTICAL DETERMINATION OF INITIAL CONDITIONS LEADING TO FIRING IN NERVE FIBERS

Coupled differential equations

AM 205: lecture 14. Last time: Boundary value problems Today: Numerical solution of PDEs

Modelling biological oscillations

F n = F n 1 + F n 2. F(z) = n= z z 2. (A.3)

6.3.4 Action potential

First order Partial Differential equations

Homotopy Perturbation Method for the Fisher s Equation and Its Generalized

1 The Stokes System. ρ + (ρv) = ρ g(x), and the conservation of momentum has the form. ρ v (λ 1 + µ 1 ) ( v) µ 1 v + p = ρ f(x) in Ω.

Stochastic differential equations in neuroscience

nonlinear oscillators. method of averaging

Figure 1: Ca2+ wave in a Xenopus oocyte following fertilization. Time goes from top left to bottom right. From Fall et al., 2002.

Compactlike Kink Solutions in Reaction Diffusion Systems. Abstract

Introduction to Physiology V - Coupling and Propagation

13.1 Ion Acoustic Soliton and Shock Wave

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 2.1 Dynamic Behavior

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture #7

Making Waves in Vector Calculus

3 Action Potentials - Brutal Approximations

Chapter 1. Introduction to Nonlinear Space Plasma Physics

Problem set 3: Solutions Math 207B, Winter Suppose that u(x) is a non-zero solution of the eigenvalue problem. (u ) 2 dx, u 2 dx.

General Physics I. Lecture 14: Sinusoidal Waves. Prof. WAN, Xin ( 万歆 )

Homogenization and error estimates of free boundary velocities in periodic media

Lecture 15: Biological Waves

1 Existence of Travelling Wave Fronts for a Reaction-Diffusion Equation with Quadratic- Type Kinetics

Shadow system for adsorbate-induced phase transition model

Lecture 6.1 Work and Energy During previous lectures we have considered many examples, which can be solved using Newtonian approach, in particular,

Finite difference method for solving Advection-Diffusion Problem in 1D

Physics 5A Final Review Solutions

arxiv: v1 [physics.bio-ph] 2 Jul 2008

Dynamical Systems and Chaos Part II: Biology Applications. Lecture 10: Coupled Systems. Ilya Potapov Mathematics Department, TUT Room TD325

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization

Energy Conservation AP

Power: Sources of Energy

* = 2 = Probability distribution function. probability of finding a particle near a given point x,y,z at a time t

HOMOTOPY PERTURBATION METHOD FOR SOLVING THE FRACTIONAL FISHER S EQUATION. 1. Introduction

Problem Set Number 2, j/2.036j MIT (Fall 2014)

Lecture Notes for Math 1000

Hopf bifurcations, and Some variations of diffusive logistic equation JUNPING SHIddd

Derivation of the General Propagation Equation

Biology in Time and Space: A Partial Differential Equation Approach. James P. Keener University of Utah

Introduction to Travelling Waves Modeling Examples. Travelling Waves. Dagmar Iber. Computational Biology (CoBI), D-BSSE, ETHZ

Dispersion relations, linearization and linearized dynamics in PDE models

Lecture 4: Importance of Noise and Fluctuations

Coherent structures near the boundary between excitable and oscillatory media

Magnetohydrodynamic Waves

Question 9: PDEs Given the function f(x, y), consider the problem: = f(x, y) 2 y2 for 0 < x < 1 and 0 < x < 1. x 2 u. u(x, 0) = u(x, 1) = 0 for 0 x 1

Mathematical Methods - Lecture 9

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 2.1 Dynamic Behavior

The influence of a line with fast diffusion on Fisher-KPP propagation : integral models

Basic Theory of Dynamical Systems

The Finite Element Method for the Analysis of Non-Linear and Dynamic Systems

1 Assignment 1: Nonlinear dynamics (due September

Oscillatory pulses in FitzHugh Nagumo type systems with cross-diffusion

Pattern formation in Nikolaevskiy s equation

Chapter 18. Remarks on partial differential equations

Index. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press

Perturbation theory for the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation

The Significance of Reduced Conductance in the Sino-Atrial Node for Cardiac Rythmicity

The Evans function and the stability of travelling waves

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Lecture 11 Dispersion

INTRODUCTION TO PDEs

Lecture 17: Initial value problems

The comparison of optimal homotopy asymptotic method and homotopy perturbation method to solve Fisher equation

Reactive Lattice Gas Model for FitzHugh-Nagumo Dynamics

CHAPTER 9 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES

LIMIT CYCLE OSCILLATORS

Chapter 2 Polynomial and Rational Functions

Separation of Variables in Linear PDE: One-Dimensional Problems

Dynamical Systems for Biology - Excitability

1 Hodgkin-Huxley Theory of Nerve Membranes: The FitzHugh-Nagumo model

A numerical solution of a Kawahara equation by using Multiquadric radial basis function

Lecture 2: Review of Prerequisites. Table of contents

Beam instabilities (I)

Ordinary differential equations

Lecture Notes for PHY 405 Classical Mechanics

Applied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems.

Potential Energy and Conservation

March 9, :18 Int J. Bifurcation and Chaos/INSTRUCTION FILE Morfu2v2 EFFECT OF NOISE AND STRUCTURAL INHOMOGENEITIES IN REACTION DIFFUSION MEDIA

Mathematical analysis of a 3D model of cellular electrophysiology

Phase Synchronization

Transcription:

Lecture 18: Bistable Fronts PHYS 221A, Spring 2017 Lectures: P. H. Diamond Notes: Xiang Fan June 15, 2017 1 Introduction In the previous lectures, we learned about Turing Patterns. Turing Instability is simple mechanism for generating heterogeneous spatial patterns via reaction-diffusion systems. Turing instability results from D A D B diffusion + perturbation about fixed points. If there are multiple fixed points, notion of a front linking differing domains is naturally of interest. In MFE, fronts appear in avalanche modeling, transport barriers, etc. The basic equation for the diffusion-reaction system is: t u = D 2 xu + f(u) (1) where f(u) is the reaction. Fronts come in (at least) two basic categories by different choices of f(u): 1. uni-stable/2nd order/fisher 2. bi-stable/1st order/fitzhugh-nagumo 2 Uni-stable Front The choice f(u) = γ(u αu 2 ) yields Fisher s Equation: t u = D 2 xu + γ(u αu 2 ) (2) 1

There are two fixed points: u = 0 and u = 1. It s easy to see that u = 0 is unstable and u = 1 is stable. This is called uni-stable. So there will be a propagating front, see Fig. 1. We will show next that the propagating speed is c = γd. Figure 1: Fixed points and front for Fisher s Equation. Key question: what is speed? In order to obtain the front speed, we assume the traveling wave solution u = f(x ct). Then the equation becomes: cf = Df + f(f) (3) This resembles the equation of motion of a particle with friction and external forcing: γẋ = mẍ δv/δx (4) Figure 2: A ball falling off a cliff. This analogy helps us understand the physics for the front. It s like a ball falls to the bottom of a cliff and stops. The role of c and γ is to dissipate work done on leading edge. We treat front as exponential in the moving frame: u = Ae k(x ct). This is accurate for the front, not saturated state for u. Consistency of front solution is c = 2 γd (5) The speed is set so that the front is marginally stable in the co-moving frame, i.e., γ vs c x. 2

Front is stable means we can extract speed from stability analysis. Front: asymptotics support leading edge. 3 Bi-stable Front What of front which connects two stable fixed points? In this section we use the FitzHugh-Nagumo model as an example to discuss bi-stable front. In practice, front, in effect, is a switch between 2 states. Such systems will have 2 stable, 1 unstable roots. The classical example is the FitzHugh- Nagumo system (toy version of HodgkinHuxley model of neuron signals): v t = f(v) w + I a + D 2 v x 2 (6) w = bv γw t (7) where I a is external stimulus. The evolution of v is fast (i.e., sodium) and that of w is slow (i.e., calcium). An example of f(v) is f(v) = v(a v)(v 1) (see Fig. 3). Figure 3: An example of f(v). Now let s find the fixed points state of the system, and ignore I a for the moment. Then we get w = f(v) = w(v) and w = bv/γ. There are three fixed points, as shown in Fig. 4. Obviously, (1) and (3) are stable (f < 0) and (2) is unstable (f > 0). So the front can link/allow transition between two stable fixed points. The unstable root powers front motion (akin Fisher). 3

Figure 4: An example of w(v). The aim of FitzHugh-Nagumo system is to describe pulses in excitable media. What s the difference between pulses and fronts? Pulses require multiple time scales. Pulses contain a leading edge, a slow evolution part, and a trailing edge. The same speed is required for both edges c + = c in order to maintain identity/coherence of the pulse. The key element is the switch-on/off fronts. Switch-on starts from v = 0. Figure 5: Pulse. 4 Simple/Basic Bi-stable Problem As discussed above, we are interested in the case where v = 0. This leads to a simpler problem: t u = f(u) + D 2 xu (8) where f(u) = A(u u 1 )(u 2 u)(u u 3 ). This is the counter-part of Fisher, it is bi-stable, i.e., f (u 1,3 ) < 0 (stable) and f (u 2 ) > 0 (unstable). 4

As usual, we look for the speed c via traveling wave: u = u(x ct): cu = Du + f(u) (9) Multiply u to the above equation, and then integral: c x(u1 ) x(u 3 ) u 2 dx = D x(u1 ) x(u 3 ) u u dx + x(u1 ) x(u 3 ) u du (10) After some algebra and the assumption that u = 0 on both sides of the front, we obtain the speed: u1 c = f(u) du/ u 3 + u 2 dx (11) Figure 6: f(u) and its area. Note that the speed c is linked to the area under f(u), the curve with 3 zero crossings, see Fig. 6. So: if A 2 > A 1 then c > 0: front advances towards x > 0. if A 2 < A 1 then c < 0: front advances towards x < 0. if A 2 = A 1 then c = 0: front stationary, co-existance. 5

The area rule is akin to Maxwell construction in thermodynamics. Equal areas means co-existance of phases. Now we continue to calculate c with concrete f: f(u) = A(u u 1 )(u 2 u)(u u 3 ). t u = A(u u 1 )(u 2 u)(u u 3 ) + D 2 xu (12) u(+ ) = u 1 (13) u( ) = u 3 (14) Try fit: u = a(u u 1 )(u u 3 ) where a is a coefficient to be determined. Plug in u : 0 = L(u) = Du + cu + A(u u 1 )(u 2 u)(u u 3 ) (15) = D[a(u u 1 )(u u 3 )] + [ca(u u 1 )(u u 3 ) + A(u u 1 )(u 2 u)(u u 3 )] (16) = Da[u (u u 3 ) + (u u 1 )u ] + [...] (17) = Da[a(u u 1 )(u u 3 ) 2 + a(u u 1 ) 2 (u u 3 )] + [...] (18) = (u u 1 )(u u 3 )[(2Da 2 A)u (Da 2 (u 1 + u 3 ) ca Au 2 )] (19) The above equation L(u) = 0 must be true for all u, so we have: so a = (A/2D) 1/2, and 2Da 2 = A (20) Da 2 (u 1 + u 3 ) ca Au 2 = 0 (21) c = (AD/2) 1/2 (u 1 2u 2 + u 3 ) (22) Note that A and γ are analogous, so c (Dγ) 1/2, as before. And c Dγc(u1, u 2, u 3 ). If u 2 = (u 1 + u 3 )/2, it s stationary front. Thus, the speed is set by parameters in reaction function. Weighted balance between there is the key. 5 Toward Pulses/Waves Let s go back to FitzHugh-Nagumo. Consider: t u = f(u) v + D xu 2 (23) t v = bu γv (24) 6

Figure 7: FitzHugh-Nagumo. OBCDO. u is fast, and v is slow. For the slow equation: v + = ϵ(lu Mv) (25) Treat v as fixed for fast bifurcations. Leading edge is set at v = 0. If v 0, i.e. t u = Du xx + f(u) (26) where f(u) = u(a u)(u 1) and 0 < a < 1. If v finite: t u = Du xx + f(u) v C (27) where v c changes effective reaction function. So c = (D/2) 1/2 (u C 2u p + u D ) (28) where u C, u P, u D are roots of f(u) = v C. Speed is function of amplitude of v. Then the pulse condition is: c + = c (v c ) (29) This condition guarantees that pulse will not disperse, i.e., forward and backward transtions propagate together at the same speed. This sets a critical amplitude v C for pulse to be excited. The slow evolution links the up, back transitions. So the FitzHugh- Nagumo model is the basic simple model of pulse in excitable media, and is constructed from basic element of bistable front. If time in included, then more phenomena will occur, such as spirals, etc. In the Magnetic Fusion Energy community, there s a saying: Reaction is in the diffusion. There are more akin models, such as Cahn-Hilliard. 7

References [1] Wikipedia contributors. FitzHugh-Nagumo model. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 31 Mar. 2015. Web. [2] Murray, J. D. Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Biology. (2002). 8