Gamma-ray observations of blazars with the Whipple 10 m telescope

Similar documents
Gamma-ray Observations of Blazars with VERITAS and Fermi

Recent Results from VERITAS

OBSERVATIONS OF VERY HIGH ENERGY GAMMA RAYS FROM M87 BY VERITAS

TEV GAMMA RAY ASTRONOMY WITH VERITAS

Extreme high-energy variability of Markarian 421

A Theoretical Model to Explain TeV Gamma-ray and X-ray Correlation in Blazars

Fermi: Highlights of GeV Gamma-ray Astronomy

Observations of Markarian 421 with VERITAS

Recent highlights from VERITAS

VERITAS detection of VHE emission from the optically bright quasar OJ 287

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Aug 2015

Status of the MAGIC telescopes

Recent Observations of Supernova Remnants

Blazars as the Astrophysical Counterparts of the IceCube Neutrinos

Very-High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy with VERITAS. Martin Schroedter Iowa State University

Fermi Source Analyses and Identifying VERITAS Candidates

TeV γ-ray observations with VERITAS and the prospects of the TeV/radio connection

VERITAS a Status Report. Nepomuk Otte on behalf of the VERITAS Collaboration

PoS(Extremesky 2011)036

VERITAS detection of VHE emission from the optically bright quasar OJ 287

VERITAS Observations of Starburst Galaxies. The Discovery of VHE Gamma Rays from a Starburst Galaxy

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

10 Years. of TeV Extragalactic Science. with VERITAS. Amy Furniss California State University East Bay

Scientific Highlights from AGN Observations with the MAGIC Telescope

Gamma-ray emission from cosmic rays and interstellar medium interactions in star-forming galaxies

Highlights from the VERITAS AGN Observation Program

Diagnostics of Leptonic vs. Hadronic Emission Models for Blazars Prospects for H.E.S.S.-II and CTA Markus Böttcher North-West University

Very High-Energy Gamma- Ray Astrophysics

FACT. Alerts from TeV Gamma Rays in the Context of Multi Messenger Astrophysics. Daniela Dorner for the FACT Collaboration

Gamma-ray Astrophysics with VERITAS: Exploring the violent Universe

The Whipple Collaboration

PoS(SWIFT 10)142. The Swift-XRT observations of HBL Source 1ES

AGILE and Blazars: the Unexpected, the Unprecedented, and the Uncut

TeV gamma-ray variability and duty cycle of Mrk 421 as determined by 3 Years of Milagro monitoring

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Dec 1997

MWL. A Brief Advertisement Before Your Regularly Scheduled Program

Energy-dependent variability in blazars SSC simulations

The blazar Mrk 421: a short multifrequency review

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

X-ray/gamma-ray flux correlations in the BL Lac Mrk 421 using HAWC data. For acomplete author list, see

GLAST and beyond GLAST: TeV Astrophysics

THE PATH TOWARDS THE CHERENKOV TELESCOPE ARRAY OBSERVATORY. Patrizia Caraveo

Multi-Wavelength Observations of PG

The VERITAS Dark M atter and Astroparticle Programs. Benjamin Zitzer For The VERITAS Collaboration

Evidence of Attenuation of VHE Blazar Spectra by Extragalactic Background Light

Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei at very high energies with H.E.S.S.

On the scientific motivation for a wide field-of-view TeV gamma-ray observatory in the Southern Hemisphere

Relativistic jets in AGNs

Constraints on Extragalactic Background Light from Cherenkov telescopes: status and perspectives for the next 5 years

Multiwaveband Observations of the TeV Blazar PKS with HESS, Fermi, RXTE and Swift

Active Galactic Nuclei in the MeV-GeV band (first results from Fermi)

The 2006 Giant Flare in PKS and Unidentified TeV Sources. Justin Finke Naval Research Laboratory 5 June 2008

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 7 Dec 1998

Milagro A TeV Observatory for Gamma Ray Bursts

The VERITAS Survey of the Cygnus Region of the Galaxy

VERITAS Design. Vladimir Vassiliev Whipple Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

Analysis of Five Fermi-LAT LBL/IBL BL Lac Objects: Examining the June 2011 Gamma-ray Flare of BL Lacertae

Search for Primordial Black Hole Evaporation with VERITAS. Simon Archambault, for the VERITAS Collaboration

Gamma-ray emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies and their place in the AGN zoo

Very High Energy monitoring of the radio galaxy M87 with MAGIC during a low emission state between 2012 and 2015

Studies on the VHE γ-ray/x-ray correlation in high-synchrotron peak BL Lacs

Pulsar Wind Nebulae as seen by Fermi-Large Area Telescope

Modelling the Variability of Blazar Jets

X-ray and Gamma-ray Study of TeV Blazars with RXTE, XMM-Newton, and the Whipple 10 m Telescope

On the origin of gamma-ray emission toward SNR

Origin of X-rays in blazars

Search for Pulsed Emission in Archival VERITAS Data

The First Fermi LAT SNR Catalog SNR and Cosmic Ray Implications

NEUTRINOS ON ICE THE SEARCH FOR THE COSMIC-RAY SOURCES FE KRAUSS, J. WILMS, M. KADLER, M. KRETER

TeV Future: APS White Paper

PoS(NEUTEL2017)079. Blazar origin of some IceCube events

The Cygnus Region - a prime target for cosmic ray accelerators

HAWC Observation of Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 9 Aug 2004

Models for the Spectral Energy Distributions and Variability of Blazars

Cherenkov Telescope Array Status Report. Salvatore Mangano (CIEMAT) On behalf of the CTA consortium

RXTE Observations of PKS during the November 1997 Gamma-Ray Outburst

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 2 Jul 2010

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 13 Jul 2015

High-resolution polarization imaging of the Fermi blazar 3C 279

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

Diversity of Multi-wavelength Behavior of Relativistic Jet in 3C 279 Discovered During the Fermi Era

Spatially Coincident Fermi-LAT γ Ray Sources to IceCube ν µ Events

NEAR-INFRARED PHOTOMETRY OF BLAZARS

Leptonic Jet Models of Blazars: Broadband Spectra and Spectral Variability

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 29 Aug 2015

Determining the TeV Gamma-Ray Emission Region in the Relativistic Jet of M87 using TeV and Radio Monitoring

HAWC: A Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope

First Light with the HAWC Gamma-Ray Observatory

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Aug 2015

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Jun 1999

Fermi-Large Area Telescope Observations of Pulsar Wind Nebulae and their associated pulsars

Search for TeV Radiation from Pulsar Tails

Constraints on cosmic-ray origin from gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Feb 2012

The Extragalactic Gamma-Ray View of AGILE and Fermi

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

CTA / ALMA synergies. C. Boisson. Zech

Transcription:

Gamma-ray observations of blazars with the Whipple 1 m telescope, presented on behalf of the VERITAS collaboration. E-mail: edward.collins.hughes@gmail.com This paper presents a status update of the current blazar monitoring campaign with the Whipple 1 m telescope. The configuration and performance characteristics of the telescope are described along with the scientific motivation behind the campaign. A summary of the results obtained from January 21 to July 21 on Markarian 421, Markarian 51, 1ES 1218+34 and 1FGL J21.1+4351 are also reported. 8th INTEGRAL Workshop "The Restless Gamma-ray Universe" September 27-3 21 Dublin Ireland Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction Imaging atmospheric Cherenkov technique (IACT) telescopes operate on the principle that cosmic rays and γ rays striking the atmosphere initiate cascades of charged particles that may be detected from the ground via the Cherenkov light that is emitted as the particles travel relativistically through the atmosphere. Photomultiplier-tube (PMT) cameras are used to image the Cherenkov light and off-line image analysis techniques select candidate γ-ray events and reject background cosmic ray events. The Whipple 1 m telescope is an IACT instrument, located in southern Arizona, that operates in the 3 GeV to 1 TeV energy range. This instrument has been in operation since 1968 and was the first ground-based γ-ray telescope to detect a galactic source, the Crab Nebula in 1989 [1], and an extragalactic source, Markarian 421 in 1992 [2]. Currently the telescope is operated by the VERITAS (Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System) collaboration as a dedicated blazar monitoring instrument, and is used as a trigger for VERITAS in case of enhanced activity from any of the blazars being monitored. 2. The Whipple 1m telescope The Whipple 1 m telescope [3] consists of an array of 248 hexagonal mirrors and an imaging PMT camera. The 248 mirrors, which are laid out in the Davies-Cotton solar-collector configuration giving a total reflecting surface of 75 m 2. The imaging camera currently contains 379 individual PMTs providing a field of view of 2.6 with an angular resolution of.117. In its current configuration the telescope achieves a 5.6σ/ hr sensitivity on the Crab Nebula. 3. Blazars An Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) is a galaxy for which the emission from its galactic core dwarfs that of the normal stellar component of the host galaxy. The galactic cores are believed to be powered by supermassive black holes surrounded by an accretion disk powering two jets of electromagnetic radiation emitted perpendicular to the disk (see figure 1 for an artist s interpretation of an AGN). Blazars are a sub-class of AGNs whose jet is at an observing angle of less than or equal to 1 degrees, making it the most obvious feature of the galaxy. Blazars exhibit broadband nonthermal variable emission with the presence of two peaks, one in the optical-kev range the other in the GeV-TeV range. See figure 2 for an example of a spectral energy distribution (SED) exhibiting both peaks. Emission models can generally be divided into two groups, where the particle species responsible for the γ-ray emission are either predominately leptonic or hadronic. Both model families attribute the low-energy peak to synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons within the jets. They differ on the origin of the TeV peak: leptonic models advocate the inverse-compton scattering mechanism, utilising synchrotron-self-compton (SSC) interactions or Compton interactions with an external photon field (e.g. see [4], [5], [6]). Hadronic models account for the high-energy peak by 2

neutral-pion or charged-pion decay with subsequent synchrotron and/or Compton emission from decay products, or synchrotron radiation from ultra relativistic protons (e.g. see [7], [8]) Figure 1: An artist s interpretation of an AGN. [http://www.physics.ucc.ie/gabuzda/pictures/agn.gif] Figure 2: An example of the SED of Markarian 51 showing the peaks of emission at both X-ray and TeV wavelengths. [Courtesy of James H. Buckley] 4. Scientific Motivation Long-term monitoring is needed to record both the long-term and short-term variability in the emission from blazars. Periods of intense, short-term variability are known as flares. These flares occur so rarely that a large amount of observing time must be dedicated to a handful of sources in order to increase the likelihood of seeing flaring activity. Short-term variability is crucial to the calculation of the size of the photon emission region. A pulse of temporal width δt provides an upper limit on the size of the emitting source given by R < cδt. Where R is the size of the emitting region and c is the speed of light. Long-term monitoring is also needed in order to trigger multiwavelength (MWL) campaigns. When a source enters a flaring period VERITAS is alerted, along with a numerous MWL partners, to a target of opportunity (ToO). Broadband observations of correlated variability are critical for testing the predictions of different theoretical models. 5. Results from January 21 to June 21 From January 21 to June 21 four sources were monitored, with a total of 19 hours of data collected. See Table 1 for each sources positional information, number of hours spent on source 3

and significance level achieved. These data will form part of a multi-year data set on Markarian 421 and Markarian 51. The Whipple 1m telescope s extensive coverage of these two sources at TeV energies is unique. Table 1: Tabulation of data taken from January 21 to June 21 Source RA DEC z Hours on Source Significance Mrk421 11 4 27.3 +38 12 31.7.31 18 67 Mrk51 16 52 52.2 +39 45 36.6.34 53 17 1ES 1218+34 12 21 21.9 +3 1 37.1 182 13.54 1FGL J21.1+4351 2 1 11.9 +43 51 51? 16 -.277 5.1 Markarian 421 Markarian 421 is one of the most active VHE blazars and was the first to be discovered at TeV energies. Its SED has peaks at the kev and TeV energies and it has been known to demonstrate rapid, sub-hour scale flaring behaviour (e.g. see [9]). It has a redshift of.31 making it the closest known TeV blazar. Figure 3 shows the daily averaged lightcurve of Markarian 421 for 21, revealing clear day-scale variation (a χ 2 test for constant emission returns a probability of ). A search within each night revealed no significant evidence for hour-scale variability. Markarian 421 ) -1 min 3 2 / ndf Graph = 143 / 43 Entries Prob Mean p RMS.8991 ±.1858 Rate ( 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 -.5 552 5522 5524 5526 5528 553 5532 5534 5536 MJD Figure 3: Daily averaged lightcurve of Markarian 421 between January 21 and June 21. 4

5.2 Markarian 51 Markarian 51 also has a well cataloged history of flaring (e.g. see [9]). Whilst being at a similar distance to Markarian 421, Markarian 51 is significantly weaker on average. This source has been intensively monitored in the past and it displays quite different time characteristics to Markarian 421. Figure 4 shows the daily averaged lightcurve of Markarian 51 for 21. A χ 2 test provides evidence for significant day-scale variability (the probablility for the constant emission is 1 1 29 ) but a search for variability on shorter timescales revealed no significant events. An event rate of greater than 4 times the Crab rate per run (28 minutes on source), as needed to trigger VERITAS observations, was not detected, but periods of increased activity in both Markarian 421 and 51 were observed. Markarian 51 ) -1 Rate ( min 1.5 1 2 / ndf Graph = 23 / 37 Entries Prob 1.53e-29 Mean p RMS.2593 ±.234.5 -.5 5526 5528 553 5532 5534 5536 MJD Figure 4: Daily averaged lightcurve of Markarian 51 between January 21 and June 21. 5.3 Other Sources There is considerable interest in 1ES 1218+34, a distant (z=.182) blazar which has a hard spectrum, since he recent discovery of day-scale flaring [11]. Its average TeV flux is 7% of the Crab Nebula making it a relatively bright blazar. A significance level of 5σ needed for a confirmed detection of 1ES 1218+34 was not achieved in the observing season from January 21 to June 21. The brightest non-vhe detected object in the 1FGL photon sky maps above 3 GeV [12] is 1FGL 21.1+4351, a likely blazar. It is firmly detected out to 1 GeV and the extrapolation of its spectrum to >1 TeV is 4 Crab, but its redshift is unknown. A significance level of 5σ needed for a 5

confirmed detection of 1FGL 21.1+4351 was not achieved in the observing season from January 21 to June 21 6. Summary The Whipple 1m blazar monitoring campaign continued from January 21 to July 21. 19 hours of data were collected on four sources. Markarian 421 and 51 were both detected with high significance, and both demonstrated variability in their emission from night to night. Data from each night were examined for variability but no significant hour-scale variability was observed. The next observing season is scheduled to start in October 21. The list of observed blazars will be expanded to include VER J521+211, RGB71+591, 1ES229+2, 1ES1959+65 and 1ES2344+514. By doing this we will make use of the full range of scientific capabilities of the Whipple 1m Telescope. 7. Acknowledgements This research is supported by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the Smithsonian Institution, by NSERC in Canada, by STFC in the UK and by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI 1/RFP/AST2748). Also, NASA and DOE in the United States, CEA/Irfu and IN2P3/CNRS in France, ASI and INFN in Italy, MEXT, KEK, and JAXA in Japan, and the K. A. Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the National Space Board in Sweden. References [1] Weekes, T.C. et al., Astrophysical Journal, 342, 37 (1989) [2] Punch, M. et al., Nature, 385, 477 (1992) [3] Acciari, V.A. et al., 29 ApJ 73 169 [4] Maraschi, L., Ghisellini, G., & Celotti, A., ApJ, 397, L5 (1992) [5] Dermer, C. D., Schlickeiser, R., & Mastichiadis, A., A&A, 256, L27 (1992) [6] Sikora, M., Begelman, M. C., & Rees, M. J., ApJ, 421, 153 (1994) [7] Mannheim, K., A&A, 269, 67 (1993) [8] Pohl, M. & Schlickeiser, R., A&A, 354, 395 (2) [9] Gaidos, J.A. et al., Nature, 383, 319 (1996) [1] Albert, J. et al., ApJ, 669, 862 (27) [11] Acciari, V.A. et al., ApJ, 79, L163 (21) [12] A. A. Abdo et al 21 ApJS 188 45 6