On α-uniformly close-to-convex and. quasi-convex functions with. negative coefficients

Similar documents
On Some α-convex Functions

A general coefficient inequality 1

n=2 AMS Subject Classification: 30C45. Keywords and phrases: Starlike functions, close-to-convex functions, differential subordination.

Subclasses of starlike functions associated with some hyperbola 1

Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Respect. to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

On Quasi-Hadamard Product of Certain Classes of Analytic Functions

Some Coefficient Inequalities for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions with respect to k-symmetric Points

Certain properties of a new subclass of close-to-convex functions

A note on a subclass of analytic functions defined by a generalized Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operator

On a subclass of n-close to convex functions associated with some hyperbola

On Starlike and Convex Functions with Respect to 2k-Symmetric Conjugate Points

A subclass of analytic functions

ON THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ INEQUALITY FOR A CLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

Subclasses of Analytic Functions. Involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta Function

Uniformly convex functions II

Second Hankel Determinant Problem for a Certain Subclass of Univalent Functions

Certain subclasses of uniformly convex functions and corresponding class of starlike functions

On a new class of (j, i)-symmetric function on conic regions

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

On a New Subclass of Salagean Type Analytic Functions

On a subclass of certain p-valent starlike functions with negative coefficients 1

Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: (electronic)

The Noor Integral and Strongly Starlike Functions

Subclass of Meromorphic Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Frasin and Darus Operator

CERTAIN DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATIONS USING A GENERALIZED SĂLĂGEAN OPERATOR AND RUSCHEWEYH OPERATOR. Alina Alb Lupaş

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

On certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with generalized struve functions

SOME INCLUSION PROPERTIES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HOHLOV OPERATOR. II

Hankel determinant for p-valently starlike and convex functions of order α

A Note on Coefficient Inequalities for (j, i)-symmetrical Functions with Conic Regions

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 18/2009 SOME SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Firas Ghanim and Maslina Darus

SUBCLASSES OF P-VALENT STARLIKE FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING CERTAIN FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Subclass Of K Uniformly Starlike Functions Associated With Wright Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

QuasiHadamardProductofCertainStarlikeandConvexPValentFunctions

Properties of Starlike Functions with Respect to Conjugate Points

SOME APPLICATIONS OF SALAGEAN INTEGRAL OPERATOR. Let A denote the class of functions of the form: f(z) = z + a k z k (1.1)

Certain classes of p-valent analytic functions with negative coefficients and (λ, p)-starlike with respect to certain points

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions Involving Higher-Order Derivatives

A New Subclasses of Meromorphic p-valent Functions with Positive Coefficient Defined by Fractional Calculus Operators

Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions. defined by an integral operator

Two Points-Distortion Theorems for Multivalued Starlike Functions

QuasiHadamardProductofCertainStarlikeandConvexFunctions

An ordinary differentail operator and its applications to certain classes of multivalently meromorphic functions

CERTAIN DIFFERENTIAL SUPERORDINATIONS USING A GENERALIZED SĂLĂGEAN AND RUSCHEWEYH OPERATORS. Alb Lupaş Alina

The Relationships Between p valent Functions and Univalent Functions

Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol 8(57), No Series III: Mathematics, Informatics, Physics, 1-12

On Univalent Functions Defined by the Multiplier Differential Operator

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

Starlike Functions of Complex Order

ON CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS AND RADIUS PROPERTIES

A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS

Convolution properties for subclasses of meromorphic univalent functions of complex order. Teodor Bulboacă, Mohamed K. Aouf, Rabha M.

Coecient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order

A NOTE ON A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALIZED SĂLĂGEAN OPERATOR. Alina Alb Lupaş, Adriana Cătaş

Meromorphic parabolic starlike functions with a fixed point involving Srivastava-Attiya operator

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

A NOVEL SUBCLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING OPERATORS OF FRACTIONAL CALCULUS P.N. Kamble 1, M.G. Shrigan 2, H.M.

Rosihan M. Ali, M. Hussain Khan, V. Ravichandran, and K. G. Subramanian. Let A(p, m) be the class of all p-valent analytic functions f(z) = z p +

Coefficient Inequalities for Classes of Uniformly. Starlike and Convex Functions Defined by Generalized. Ruscheweyh Operator

STARLIKE MAPPINGS OF ORDER α ON THE UNIT BALL IN COMPLEX BANACH SPACES

On close-to-convex functions satisfying a differential inequality

Coefficients estimates of some subclasses of analytic functions related with conic domain

denote the subclass of the functions f H of the form H of the form

On a New Subclass of Meromorphically Multivalent Functions Defined by Linear Operator

On neighborhoods of functions associated with conic domains

Differential Operator of a Class of Meromorphic Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients

Quasi-Convex Functions with Respect to Symmetric Conjugate Points

The Order of Starlikeness of New p-valent Meromorphic Functions

FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

Some properties for α-starlike functions with respect to k-symmetric points of complex order

Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Srivastava-Attiya Integral Operator

j(z) > + FZ f(z) z + oz f(z) 1-.F < 1-.F zf (z) } 1 E (z 6 U,F 1). (1.3) >/(z e u) ANGULAR ESTIMATIONS OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Coefficient bounds for some subclasses of p-valently starlike functions

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

SOME SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal

Some Further Properties for Analytic Functions. with Varying Argument Defined by. Hadamard Products

ON CERTAIN CLASSES OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING A GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

Existence Theorem for Abstract Measure. Differential Equations Involving. the Distributional Henstock-Kurzweil Integral

PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF A FAMILY CONSISTING OF BAZILEVIĆ (TYPE) FUNCTIONS SPECIFIED BY CERTAIN LINEAR OPERATORS

Research Article Subordination Results on Subclasses Concerning Sakaguchi Functions

On a class of analytic functions related to Hadamard products

Differential Subordinations and Harmonic Means

The equivalence of Picard, Mann and Ishikawa iterations dealing with quasi-contractive operators

Convolution Properties of Convex Harmonic Functions

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

On certain subclasses of analytic functions

COEFFICIENTS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING PSEUDO-STARLIKENESS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS

On sandwich theorems for p-valent functions involving a new generalized differential operator

On a subclass of analytic functions involving harmonic means

Strong convergence to a common fixed point. of nonexpansive mappings semigroups

COEFFICIENT BOUNDS FOR A SUBCLASS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

Sang-baek Lee*, Jae-hyeong Bae**, and Won-gil Park***

HARMONIC CLOSE-TO-CONVEX MAPPINGS

Subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers

Convex Functions and Functions with Bounded Turning

AN EXTENSION OF THE REGION OF VARIABILITY OF A SUBCLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

A NOTE ON RUSCHEWEYH TYPE OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Majorization Properties for Subclass of Analytic p-valent Functions Defined by the Generalized Hypergeometric Function

Differential subordination theorems for new classes of meromorphic multivalent Quasi-Convex functions and some applications

Transcription:

heoretical Mathematics & Applications, vol.3, no.2, 2013, 29-37 ISSN: 1792-9687 (print), 1792-9709 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2013 On α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions with negative coefficients Irina Dorca 1 Abstract In this paper we study a class of α-uniformly starlike functions with negative coefficients, a class of α-uniformly convex functions with negative coefficients, a class of α-uniformly close-to-convex functions with negative coefficients and a class of quasi-convex functions with negative coefficients. Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45 Keywords: α-uniformly starlike functions, α-uniformly convex functions, α- uniformly close-to-convex functions, quasi-convex functions, negative coefficients. 1 Introduction Let H(U) be the set of functions which are regular in the unit disc U, A = {f H(U) : f(0) = f (0) 1 = 0} (1) 1 University of Piteşti. Romania. Article Info: Received : April 22, 2013. Revised : May 30, 2013 Published online : June 25, 2013

30 On α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions and S = {f A : f is univalent in U}. In [3] the subfamily of S consisting of functions f of the form f(z) = z was introduced. a j z j, a j 0, j = 2, 3,..., z U (2) Let (n, p) denote the class of functions of the form f(z) = z p a p + pz l+p,, a l+p 0, p, j N = {1, 2,...}, (3) p=j which are analytic in U. We have (1, 1) =. he purpose of this paper is to define a class of α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions with negative coefficients. For this, we make use of the following well known results, which are taken from literature. 2 Preliminary Results We begin with the assertions concerning the starlike functions with negative coefficients (e.g. heorem 2.1), we continue with the operator I c+δ (see (4)) and we end by recalling some known results from [5] and [6] that we use forward in our study. he methods used to prove our results are taken from literature. heorem 2.1. [2] If f(z) = z a j z j, a j 0, j = 2, 3,..., z U then the next assertions are equivalent: (i) ja j 1 (ii) f (iii) f, where = S and S is the well-known class of starlike functions. Definition 2.1. [2] Let α [0, 1) and n N, then { } S n (α) = f A : Re Dn+1 f(z) D n > α, z U f(z)

Irina Dorca 31 is the set of n-starlike functions of order α. Also, we denote n (α) = S n (α). In [1] is defined the integral operator: I c+δ : A A, c < u 1, 1 δ <, 0 < c <, with 1 f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) = () 0 u c+δ 2 F (uz)du. (4) Remark 2.1. If F (z) = z + c j z j, the Also we notice that 0 < δ [1, ). f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) = z + c + j + δ 1 c + j + δ 1 a jz j. < 1, where c (0, ), j 2, Remark 2.2. It is easy to prove that for F (z) and f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) we have f(z), where I c+δ is the integral operator defined by (4). In [5] are presented the following classes of analytic functions: Definition 2.2. [5] following inequality: Let C S denote the class of functions in S satisfying the { } (zf (z)) Re > 0, (z U). (5) f (z) + f ( z) Definition 2.3. [5] Let US (k) (α, β) denote the class of functions in satisfying the following inequality: { } zf (z) Re > α zf (z) f k (z) f k (z) 1 + β, (z U), (6) where α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 is a fixed positive integer and f k (z) are defined by the following equality: f k (z) = 1 k 1 ε ν f(ε ν z), (ε k = 1, z U). (7) k ν=0

32 On α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions If k = 1, then the class US (k) (α, β) reduces to the class of α-uniformly starlike functions of order β. If k = 2, α = 0 and β = 0, then the class US (k) (α, β) reduces to the class SS of starlike functions with respect to symmetric points. From [4] we know that if f(z) S, { } zf (z) Re > 0, z U. (8) f(z) f( z) Definition 2.4. [5] Let UCV (k) (α, β) denote the class of functions in satisfying the following inequality: { } (zf (z)) Re f k (z) > α (zf (z)) f k (z) 1 + β, (z U), (9) where α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 is a fixed positive integer and f k (z) are defined by (7). If k = 1, then the class UCV (k) (α, β) reduces to the class of α-uniformly convex functions of order β. If k = 2, α = 0 and β = 0, then the class UCV (k) (α, β) reduces to the class CS. heorem 2.2. [5] Let α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer and f(z). hen f(z) US (k) (α, β) iff [(1 + α)(jk + 1) (α + β)] a jk+1 + (10) (1 + α)ja j < 1 β., j lk+1 heorem 2.3. [6] Let α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer and f(z). hen f(z) UCV (k) (α, β) if and only if (jk + 1)[(1 + α)(jk + 1) (α + β)] a jk+1 + (11) (1 + α)j 2 a j < 1 β., j lk+1

Irina Dorca 33 Definition 2.5. [6] Let C (k) (λ, α) denote the class of functions in A satisfying the following inequality: { } zf (z) + λz 2 f (z) Re (1 λ)f k (z) + λzf k (z) > α, (z U), (12) where 0 α < 1, 0 λ 1, k 2 is a fixed positive integer and f k (z) is defined by equality (7). Definition 2.6. [6] Let QC (k) (λ, α) denote the class of functions in A satisfying the following inequality: { } Re z λz2 f (z) + (2λ + 1)zf (z) + f (z) λz 2 f k (z) + zf k (z) > α, (z U), (13) where 0 α < 1, 0 λ 1, k 2 is a fixed positive integer and f k (z) is defined by equality (7). For convenience we write C (k) (λ, α) as C (k) (λ, α) and QC(k) (λ, α) as QC (k) (λ, α). heorem 2.4. [6] Let 0 α < 1, 0 λ < 1, k 2 be a fixed positive integer and f(z), then f(z) C (k) (λ, α) iff (1 + λjk)(jk + 1 α) a jk+1 + (14) [1 + λ(j 1)] ja j 1 α., j lk+1 heorem 2.5. [6] Let 0 α < 1, 0 λ < 1, k 2 be a fixed positive integer and f(z), then f(z) QC (k) (λ, α) if and only if (jk + 1)(1 + λjk)(jk + 1 α) a jk+1 + (15) [1 + λ(j 1)] j 2 a j 1 α., j lk+1

34 On α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions 3 Main results We firstly apply the operator I c+δ (see (4)) on a α-uniformly starlike function of order β with negative coefficients and we prove that the resulting function conserves in the same class of α-uniformly starlike functions of order β with negative coefficients. heorem 3.1. Let F (z) = z a j z j, a j 0, j 2, F (z) US (k) (α, β), α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer. hen f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) US (k) (α, β), where I c+δ is the integral operator defined by (4). Proof. From Remark 2.2 we obtain f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)). From Remark 2.1 we have: f(z) = z c + j + δ 1 a jz j, where 0 < c <, j 2, 1 δ <. From F (z) US (k) (α, β), by using heorem 2.2, we have: [(1 + α)(jk + 1) (α + β)] a jk+1 + (16), j lk+1 (1 + α)ja j < 1 β. Using again heorem 2.2 we observe that it is sufficient to prove that: [(1 + α)(jk + 1) (α + β)] c + jk + δ + (17), j lk+1 From hypothesis we have (1 + α)j c + j + δ 1 < 1 β. 0 < c + jk + δ < 1 and 0 < c + j + δ 1 < 1. (18) hus, we see that, by using (16) and (18), the condition (17) holds. means that f(z) US (k) (α, β). his Using a similar method as in heorem 3.1, we apply the operator I c+δ (see (4)) on a α-uniformly convex function of order β with negative coefficients and

Irina Dorca 35 we prove that the resulting function conserves in the same class of α-uniformly convex functions of order β with negative coefficients. heorem 3.2. Let F (z) = z a j z j, a j 0, j 2, F (z) UCV (k) (α, β), α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer. hen f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) UCV (k) (α, β), where I c+δ is the integral operator defined by (4). Next, we apply the operator I c+δ (see (4)) on a α-uniformly close to convex function of order β with negative coefficients and we prove that the resulting function conserves in the same class of α-uniformly close to convex functions of order β with negative coefficients. heorem 3.3. Let F (z) = z a j z j, a j 0, j 2, F (z) C (k) (α, β), α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer. hen f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) C (k) (α, β), where I c+δ is the integral operator defined by (4). Proof. From Remark 2.2 we have f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)). From Remark 2.1 we have: f(z) = z c + j + δ 1 a jz j, where 0 < c <, j 2, 1 δ <. From F (z) C (k) (α, β), by using heorem 2.4, we have: (1 + λjk)(jk + 1 α) a jk+1 + (19), j lk+1 [1 + λ(j 1)]ja j 1 α. Using again heorem 2.4 we notice that it is sufficient to prove that: (1 + λjk)(jk + 1 α) c + jk + δ + (20), j lk+1 [1 + λ(j 1)]j c + j + δ 1 1 α.

36 On α-uniformly close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions From hypothesis we have 0 < c + jk + δ < 1 and 0 < c + j + δ 1 < 1. (21) hus, we obtain, by using (19) and (21), that the condition (20) holds. his means that f(z) C (k) (α, β). We end our research by taking into account a similar method as in heorem 3.3, where we apply the operator I c+δ (see (4)) on a quasi-convex function of order β with negative coefficients and we prove that the resulting function conserves in the same class of quasi-convex functions of order β with negative coefficients. heorem 3.4. Let F (z) = z a j z j, a j 0, j 2, F (z) QC (k) (α, β), α 0, 0 β < 1, k 1 be a fixed positive integer. hen f(z) = I c+δ (F (z)) QC (k) (α, β), where I c+δ is the integral operator defined by (4). ACKNOWLEDGEMENS. his work was partially supported by the strategic project POSDRU 107/1.5/S/77265, inside POSDRU Romania 2007-2013 co-financed by the European Social Fund-Investing in People. References [1] M. Acu and S. Owa, Note on a class of starlike functions, Proceeding of the International Short Joint Work on Study on Calculus Operators in Univalent Function heory, Kyoto, (2006), 1-10. [2] G.S. Sălăgean, Geometria Planului Complex, Ed. Promedia Plus, Cluj - Napoca, 1999. [3] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 5, (1975), 109-116.

Irina Dorca 37 [4] K. Sakaguchi, In certain univalent mapping, J.M. Soc. Japan, 11, (1959), 72-75. [5] Wang Zhigang, On Subclasses of Close-to-convex and Quasi-convex Functions With Respect to k-symmetric Points, Advances In Mathematics, 38(1), (2009), 44-56. [6] Zhi-Gang Wang, Chun-Y Gao, Halit Orfan and Sezgin Akbulut, Some subclasses of close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions with respect to k-symmetric points, General Mathematics, 15(4), (2007), 107-119.