Date: April 3, 2018 Revised May 15, Project #: Re: Burlington Mall Retail Collection Transportation Evaluation

Similar documents
NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

Trip Generation Characteristics of Super Convenience Market Gasoline Pump Stores

Traffic Impact Study

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

Travel Demand Management Plan

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

SHADE/SHADOW REPORT. For the Proposed 8777 Washington Project. Culver City, CA. Prepared for:

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

Establishment of Local Trip Generation Rates or Equations for Mixed-Use Developments in Kansas

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

2129 NORTH MAIN STREET HOTE PROJECT ULI SHARED PARKING STUDY City of Santa Ana, California

Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. Appendix A: Growth Estimates

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

The Urbana Free Library Parking and Transportation Study

Winning Farm of Winchester

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12

225 Bush Street Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA phone fax

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Date: August 3, Project #:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Case Special Exception request for Planned Unit Development (PUD) The Vineyards

SHORT NIGHTTIME WATER SHUTDOWN TO OCCUR IN EARLY HOURS OF MAY 29

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

Appendix C Traffic Study

Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project.

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25

RE: Existing and Future Parking Demand Analysis St. Joseph Center Expansion

Appendix I: Traffic Study

TOWN OF WINCHESTER OFFICE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 71 Mount Vernon Street. Winchester, MA 01890

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

Downtown Parking Study

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DRAFT

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

Parking areas in all zoning districts shall comply with the following standards:

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. AESTHETICS SHADE/SHADOW

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

2014 Data Collection Project ITE Western District

4.A.3 SHADE/SHADOW 1. INTRODUCTION. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Existing Conditions. (1) Project Vicinity 4.A.3 1

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

15.0 Operations and Maintenance Cost Calculations

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

GRB QUICK REFERENCE: Contact Information.

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Jordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department

DOWNTOWN SUB-AREA. Final Parking Study. Prepared for: City of Bellingham. March Prepared by:

PROJECTS IN PROGRESS. October 2015

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)

570 Hazeldean Road, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Mattamy Homes. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Project Number:

North Easton Village Parking Study. Final Report

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

Proclaiming Certain Lands as Reservation for the Confederated Tribes of the

APPENDIX B. CalEEMod Output Files

Attachment E: CADP Design Shadow Analysis

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES GEORGE R. BROWN CONVENTION CENTER GREATER HOUSTON PARTNERSHIP BUILDING HOUSTON, TEXAS

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY...

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 2015 AGENDA 2015 ANNEXATION MISC

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

Transcription:

To: Chuck Schneider Burlington S&S, LLC 225 West Washington Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: April 3, 2018 Revised May 15, 2018 Project #: 13482.01 Re: Burlington Mall Retail Collection Transportation Evaluation Burlington S&S, LLC (the Proponent) is proposing to reposition portions of the Burlington Mall (the Project) located on in Burlington, Massachusetts (the Site ). Specifically, the Proponent is seeking to redevelop the former Sears Auto Center ( TBA ) building to include a mixture of restaurant and retail uses. This work also will involve minor Site revisions to accommodate new outdoor dining areas and improvements to the Site layout, parking, and access. The building space recently occupied by the Sears anchor store at the northern end of the Burlington Mall also is planned to be redeveloped to include a similar mixture of retail and restaurant space. The following memorandum summarizes the potential changes in traffic generation associated with the Project and evaluates potential Project impacts. Existing Conditions In total, the Burlington Mall currently contains 1,591,024 square feet (sf) of total physical building area, including the currently vacant Sears TBA outparcel building. This building area includes leasable space for a variety of tenants, as well as common space, mechanical rooms, and other non-leasable area used for the general operation of the mall. The parking needs for the mall are currently accommodated by approximately 5,573 on-site parking spaces. Burlington Mall Site Access Access to the mall currently is provided by multiple driveways on the abutting roads. A full-access signalized driveway is located at the approximate midpoint of the property s frontage. A right-turn, enter-only driveway is located immediately south of the signal, and a driveway restricted to entering/exiting right-turns only is located roughly 850 north of the signal (and 400 feet to the south of Burlington Mall Road). Two separate signalized driveways are provided on Burlington Mall Road. The first is located approximately 800 feet to the east of Middlesex Turnpike. The mall driveway is slightly offset from Meadow Road on the opposite side of the roadway, with both approaches operating under the same signal controller. Approximately 750 feet further to the east, Burlington Mall Road is intersected by the mall driveway from the south and Lexington Street from the north. Sears TBA Access The currently vacant Sears TBA building is located at the northwest corner of the overall Burlington Mall property. This parcel also is located at the southwest corner of Burlington Mall Road s signalized intersection with the mall driveway opposite Meadow Road. Extending to the south from Burlington Mall Road, the mall driveway features two lanes in each direction separated by an approximately eight-foot wide landscaped median. Access to the former Sears TBA parcel currently is provided by a full-access unsignalized driveway intersecting the median-divided mall driveway approximately 195 feet to the south of Burlington Mall Road. Access to this parcel also is provided via two driveways on the mall east/west circulation aisle extending from to the median-divided mall driveway noted above. The first driveway is located just west of the above-mentioned drive aisle, and a second driveway is located 135 feet to the west of that. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 2 Proposed Project The proposed Project will involve the redevelopment of the vacant Sears TBA building, and the reoccupancy of recently-vacated building space previously occupied by the Sears anchor store. The following sections summarize the proposed Project components. Sears TBA The currently vacant Sears TBA building contains 28,460 sf of former auto-service/retail space, with an additional 19,756 sf of below-grade storage space. In total, the building contains a combined 48,216 sf of leasable building area. The development proposal involves the existing TBA building being redeveloped as approximately 35,000 sf of total outparcel building space to be occupied by retail/restaurant uses. Current plans call for approximately nine retail tenant spaces and five restaurants, generally to be positioned at the corners of the building. Of the 35,000 sf of total building area, these restaurants will occupy 11,337 sf of building area and will include 316 seats with an additional 157 patio seats. The remainder of the building will be used for approximately 21,831 sf of leasable retail space, with additional space to be used for storage, mechanical space, etc. Sears anchor store repositioning The repositioning of the former first-floor Sears anchor store space will consist of retenanting that space to include a mixture of retail and restaurant space. This work will involve improvements to the exterior of the building and sidewalk areas, which also will allow for outdoor patio restaurant seating. Following this work, there will be roughly 39,011 sf of restaurant space provided including 1,107 seats (and an additional 335 outdoor patio restaurant seats). The remainder of the former Sears space will be occupied by multiple retail tenants with a total gross leasable area (GLA) of 74,774 sf. A 5,365-sf section of the northeasterly end of the Sears building will be demolished to allow for this and other landscape amenity space. The upper story space including the Primark tenant space will remain unchanged. With the former Sears space being replaced by multiple smaller stores and restaurants occupying the former Sears space, there now will be newly-created common space serving these individual tenants similar to that which exists throughout the rest of the mall. Accordingly, there now will be multiple tenants within the former Sears footprint, but with a reduced total leasable area due to the introduction of this common space. In total, the mall currently has 1,328,821 sf of gross leasable area (GLA). This includes the former 48,216 sf of TBA building area, approximately 4,000 sf of sales carts currently located within the main hallways of the mall, and multiple retail and restaurant tenants (including associated stockrooms and supporting leasable space). Table 1 provides an overall summary in the proposed changes to the mall categorized by the newly created uses and associated changes to the existing Burlington Mall. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 3 Table 1 Development Program Retail Proposed New Restaurant Automotive Building Area Seats Existing total Mall leasable space (GLA): 1,328,821 sf - Sears TBA -48,216 sf Existing Mall Retail/restaurant space (GLA): 1,280,605 sf Sears TBA redevelopment Existing TBA demolition -28,460 sf Existing TBA storage demolition -19,756 sf Proposed TBA retail 21,831 sf Proposed TBA restaurant 11,337 sf 316 (+157 patio) Sears TBA subtotal +21,831 sf +11,337 sf 316 (+157 patio) -48,216 sf Sears repositioning 1 st floor/sears to be modified -147,540 sf Proposed new/remaining retail 74,774 sf Change in GLA: Retail conversion to common area -22,988 sf Retail conversion to misc. -4,292 sf Building demolition -5,365 sf Existing compactor removal -1,110 sf Retail conversion to restaurant -39,011 sf 39,011 sf 1,107 (+335 patio) Change in GLA subtotal -72,766 sf +39,011 sf 1,107 (+335 patio) Net change -50,935 sf +50,348 sf 1,423 seats (+492 patio) -48,216 sf Total Retail (inc. existing restaurants) 1,229,670 sf +50,348 sf 1,423 seats (+492 patio) 0 sf Total Retail & existing/new restaurants 1,280,018 sf Total Building Area (GSF) a Existing Burlington Mall (GSF) Proposed Burlington Mall (GSF) 1,591,024 sf 1,571,333 sf Net change: -19,691 sf GSF = Gross Square Footage. GLA = Gross Leasable Area. a Total building area includes gross leasable tenant space and additional non-leasable area (offices, common areas, mechanical rooms, etc.) \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 4 As shown in Table 1, the Project will result in an overall 19,691 sf reduction in the total building area at the Burlington Mall. Furthermore, the 1,328,821 sf of total mall leasable area will decrease to 1,280,019 sf GLA with the Project; a reduction of approximately 48,802 sf. The following sections discuss how traffic generation was estimated for the Project considering this reduction, as well as the new uses proposed within the Site. Trip Generation Potential traffic increases associated with the Project were estimated using standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data 1, considering the difference between the existing and proposed Burlington Mall building area and uses. The following sections discuss the three different methodologies considered for this analysis to estimate the potential changes in Project trip generation. Method 1 ITE Shopping Center With the overall reduction in building area it reasonably could be assumed that there will be a corresponding reduction in trip generation. However, to provide for a conservative analysis, trip generation was evaluated also considering the unique nature of the former Sears TBA use. While the Project will revitalize and renovate a significant portion of the mall, the Burlington Mall still will remain as a standard regional shopping center, though one with an increased amount of restaurant space. Therefore, the trip generation for the proposed conditions was compared to the current Burlington Mall using ITE Shopping Center data consistent with industry practices. The definition for this ITE land use code notes that shopping centers can include retail, restaurant, and other uses, as well as outparcel developments similar to that present at the Burlington Mall. ITE also notes that trip generation should be estimated based on the gross leasable area of the mall, and not including common areas, mechanical rooms, etc. For this analysis, trip generation for the former Sears TBA use was calculated separately using ITE data independent from the remaining overall Burlington Mall Shopping Center space. The resulting change in trip generation for the overall Burlington Mall using this methodology is shown in Table 2. 1 Trip Generation Manual (10 th edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington DC, 2017. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 5 Table 2 Method 1 Trip Generation Summary Shopping Center Proposed Retail/ New Restaurant a Existing Retail a Former Sears TBA b = Existing Total Retail/ TBA a Change 1,280,018 sf c 1,280,605 sf c 48,216 sf c 1,328,821 sf c Weekday Daily Enter 17,018 17,023 572 17,595-577 Exit 17,018 17,023 572 17,595-577 Total 34,036 34,046 1,144 35,190-1,154 Weekday Evening Enter 1,721 1,721 61 1,782-61 Exit 1,864 1,865 67 1,932-68 Total 3,585 3,586 128 3,714-129 Saturday Daily Enter 21,649 21,655 572 22,227-578 Exit 21,649 21,655 572 22,227-578 Total 43,298 43,310 1,144 44,454-1,156 Saturday Midday Enter 2,412 2,413 61 2,474-62 Exit 2,227 2,227 67 2,294-67 Total 4,639 4,640 128 4,768-129 a Source: Trip Generation Manual 10 th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2017). Land Use Code 820 b (Shopping Center). Estimates based on 1,280,018 sf of proposed retail/existing restaurant GLA, and 50,348 sf of new restaurant use. Source: Ibid. Land Use Code 942 (Automobile Care Center). Trip generation data not available for Saturday midday peak hour. Trip generation during this time period is assumed to be equal to that during the weekday evening peak hour. The proposed Project involves a 48,802 sf reduction in tenant leasable area. With that reduction in GLA there should be a corresponding reduction in trip generation. As shown in Table 2, the total traffic generated by the Site should be reduced by 129 trips during both the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. This procedure follows industry standards for estimating shopping center traffic generation, and is the most reasonable means of estimating trip generation as it also considers the former TBA use as a separate entity. While the Project involves the introduction of new restaurant space, it will not change the overall function of the Burlington Mall as a regional shopping center. The proposed new mixture of casual and finer dining establishments can be found at any shopping mall, and are consistent with the current and former use of the Site. In addition to the \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 6 food court area, the mall already includes multiple restaurants, and until recently also included a Pizzeria Uno and Rainforest Café. The new restaurant space proposed as part of this Project will represent only four-percent of the total GLA in the Burlington Mall, so the overall dynamic of the mall will not be changing significantly. Method 2 ITE Shopping Center Retail and Restaurant (Building Area) Components VHB also evaluated trip generation using an alternate procedure focusing on the increase in restaurant building space. While the Burlington Mall still clearly meets the ITE definition of a Shopping Center under proposed conditions, the increased amount of restaurant space was considered separately for this exercise. The existing restaurant space within the mall will remain unchanged, but the additional restaurant space proposed was estimated as an overall new entity. Specifically, for the proposed condition the changes in retail and restaurant building space were considered separately, with the resulting difference being compared to the existing Burlington Mall. A detailed description of each step in this process is provided as follows. Method 2 Retail As shown earlier in Table 1, the amount of leasable retail space within the Site (not including the former TBA use) will be reduced by 50,935 sf. With that reduction, there will be a corresponding reduction in retail trips, but that area will be replaced by new restaurant space generating traffic as discussed in the following section. Method 2 Restaurants Exact tenants for each of the new multiple restaurant tenant spaces are currently not known. However, based on information provided by mall ownership, approximately 75-percent of the new restaurant space is being marketed towards casual restaurant uses, with the remaining 25-percent of the leasable area devoted to more formal, finer dining establishments. To account for this mixture of restaurant styles, trip generation estimates for the new restaurant components were based on ITE data for a standard High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant. ITE also recently added a new Fast Casual Restaurant land use code which has a definition similar to the style of restaurants proposed. However, that ITE database is very limited, with only three studies available for Saturday midday peak hour conditions. Accordingly, trip generation for 75-percent of the planned restaurant space was based on the ITE High-Turnover (Sit- Down) Restaurant land use code. The remaining 25-percent of the leasable restaurant space is expected to be more formal in nature, similar to the ITE Quality Restaurant land-use description. Trip Sharing Use of the ITE Shopping Center land use code is the most appropriate means of estimating mall traffic as it accounts for the internal trip sharing that is inherent to any regional shopping center. The ITE data shows that external trip generation rates decrease as a mall s size increases. This is due to the increased internal trip sharing that occurs between the multiple businesses within a given site. In this instance, the new restaurant space will simply be another attraction to mall shoppers and will not function as an entirely new, independent entity. The restaurants obviously will attract new visitors to the Site, but a substantial portion of the restaurant patrons already will be visiting the Site as shoppers. These trips will occur as walking trips within the mall, or between the mall and redeveloped Sears TBA building, but will not show up as additional vehicle trips at the Site driveways or on the adjacent streets. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 7 If the new restaurant space is to be considered separately, it is important that this internal trip sharing be quantified. ITE 2 has an established methodology for estimating trip generation for scenarios where two or more distinct land uses exist on a site. The ITE database includes trip sharing data between multiple land uses including retail and restaurant for peak-hour conditions. The percent of retail customers that may visit a restaurant after shopping is summarized, as well as diners than may shop before leaving the site. For instance, the ITE database indicates that half of restaurant patrons may shop after dining as part of their same trip before leaving the site. Similar interactions also will occur involving shoppers dining before or after shopping as part of their primary purpose for being on Site. The results of the trip generation estimates based on the proposed retail and restaurant components being considered separately (Method 2) are summarized in Table 3. 2 Trip Generation Handbook 3 rd edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington DC, 2017. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 8 Table 3 Method 2 Trip Generation Summary Proposed Shopping Center by Component (using restaurant building area) Retail Space Proposed New Restaurant Space Total - shared trips b Casual c + Quality d = Total Restaurant - shared trips b Total External Trips Size 1,229,670 sf a 37,761 sf 12,587 sf 50,348 sf 1,280,018 sf Weekday Evening Enter 1,670 121 229 66 295 50 1,794 Exit 1,809 50 140 32 172 121 1,810 Total 3,479 171 369 98 467 171 3,604 Saturday Midday Enter 2,337 121 215 79 294 76 2,434 Exit 2,157 76 207 55 262 121 2,222 Total 4,494 197 422 134 556 197 4,656 a Source: Trip Generation Manual 10 th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2017). Land Use Code 820 b c d (Shopping Center). Source: Trip Generation Handbook 3 rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2017). Internal trip-sharing estimated based on methodology summarized in Chapter 6. Saturday midday peak hour trip sharing percentages assumed to equal those for weekday evening peak hour (Saturday data unavailable). Source: Trip Generation Manual 10 th Edition, ITE, Washington D.C. (2017). Land Use Code 932 (High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant). Approximately 75% of total new leasable restaurant area assumed to be non-formal, high-turnover/fast-casual oriented. Ibid. Land Use Code 931 (Quality Restaurant). Approximately 25% of total new leasable restaurant area assumed to be fine dining/quality restaurant in nature. The peak-hour trip generation estimates shown in Table 3 represent the total trip generation for the Site s retail components (including existing restaurant space that will remain unchanged), and the additional newly proposed restaurant uses. Table 4 compares the resulting new external Site trips to the existing Burlington Mall. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 9 Table 4 Method 2 Trip Generation Comparison Proposed vs. Existing Total Proposed External Trips a Total Existing External Trips b Difference Weekday Evening Enter 1,794 1,782 12 Exit 1,810 1,932-122 Total 3,604 3,714-110 Saturday Midday Enter 2,434 2,474-40 Exit 2,222 2,294-72 Total 4,656 4,768-112 a Source: Table 3. b Source: Table 2. As shown in Table 4, even considering the new restaurant uses separately from the retail space, there still will be a reduction in external trips appearing at the Site driveways. Specifically, the Project should result in a decrease of 110 and 112 trips during the respective weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. However, the Project is expected to increase the interaction between the restaurants and other retail space within the Site in the form of internal pedestrian activity. As with existing conditions, not all of the external traffic generated by the Project will be new to the area roadways. For example, a portion of the external vehicle-trips generated by the retail and restaurant uses likely will be drawn from traffic already travelling past the Site, which is attracted to the new uses as the motorists are passing through the area. The primary origin and destination for these trips is elsewhere and the primary trip will be resumed following the visit to the site. Pass-by rates also are provided by ITE in the Trip Generation Manual. Traffic count and survey data from nationwide retail locations have been collected by ITE for the purposes of pass-by trip calculation. Based on the ITE data, approximately 34- and 26-percent of peak-hour retail traffic on a respective weekday and Saturday is in the form of pass-by trips. Likewise, while Saturday information is not available, ITE indicates that a high-turnover restaurant will have a pass-by rate of approximately 43-percent during the weekday evening peak hour. Method 3 ITE Shopping Center Retail and Restaurant (Seats) Components The final trip generation methodology considered is the same as Method 2, with the exception that the proposed number of new seats was used to estimate restaurant trip generation instead of the associated building area. The resulting trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 5. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 10 Table 5 Method 3 Trip Generation Summary Proposed Shopping Center by Component (using restaurant seats) Retail Space - shared Total trips b Proposed New Restaurant Seats (1,423 seats + 492 patio = 1,915 seats total) 75% Casual c + 25% Quality d = Total Restaurant - shared trips b Total External Trips Size 1,229,670 sf a 1,436 seats 479 seats 1,915 seats 1,280,018 sf Weekday Evening Enter 1,670 172 344 75 419-86 1,831 Exit 1,809 86 259 37 296-172 1,847 Total 3,479 258 603 112 715-258 3,678 Saturday Midday Enter 2,337 197 403 78 481-119 2,502 Exit 2,157 119 358 54 412-197 2,253 Total 4,494 316 761 132 893-316 4,755 a Source: Trip Generation Manual 10 th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2017). Land Use Code 820 b c d (Shopping Center). Source: Trip Generation Handbook 3 rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington D.C. (2017). Internal trip-sharing estimated based on methodology summarized in Chapter 6. Saturday midday peak hour trip sharing percentages assumed to equal those for weekday evening peak hour (Saturday data unavailable). Source: Trip Generation Manual 10 th Edition, ITE, Washington D.C. (2017). Land Use Code 932 (High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant). Approximately 75% of total new leasable restaurant area assumed to be non-formal, high-turnover/fast-casual oriented. Ibid. Land Use Code 931 (Quality Restaurant). Approximately 25% of total new leasable restaurant area assumed to be fine dining/quality restaurant in nature. The peak-hour trip generation estimates shown in Table 5 represent the total trip generation for the Site retail components, and the newly proposed restaurant uses (based on seating). Table 6 compares the resulting new external Site trips to the existing Burlington Mall using this methodology. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 11 Table 6 Method 3 Trip Generation Comparison Proposed vs. Existing Total Proposed External Trips a Total Existing External Trips b Difference Weekday Evening Enter 1,831 1,782 49 Exit 1,847 1,932-85 Total 3,678 3,714-36 Saturday Midday Enter 2,502 2,474 28 Exit 2,253 2,294-41 Total 4,755 4,768-13 a Source: Table 5. b Source: Table 2. Table 6 presents the potential changes in Site traffic as estimated considering the total amount of proposed retail space and the number of new restaurant seats. Between the reoccupancy of the former TBA building and vacant Sears space, there will be 1,423 new restaurant seats, and an additional 492 patio seats. As these seats generally would only be in use in warm conditions, the trip generation is conservative in that over 25-percent of the seats incorporated into the analysis would only be in use for part of the year (and not during peak winter holiday shopping conditions). Even with these conservative assumptions, there still would be an overall reduction in trip generation during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. Based on this methodology, the Project would result in a decrease of 36 and 13 trips during the respective weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. Traffic Count / ITE Trip Generation Comparison VHB previously had conducted traffic counts of the Burlington Mall site driveways in November 2013. These counts were conducted as part of the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the nearby New England Executive Park development project. The count sheets are provided for reference in the appendix to this document. A summary of the observed volumes at each driveway are summarized in Table 7. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 12 Table 7 Mall Counts / ITE Trip Generation Comparison Weekday Evening Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Driveway Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Percent at right-in driveway 392-392 1,147 1,147 22% signalized mall driveway 105 550 655 310 925 1,235 29% right-in/right-out driveway 35 81 116 137 143 280 6% Burlington Mall Road/ Sears driveway 175 145 320 300 240 540 13% Burlington Mall Road/ mall driveway 400 330 730 605 685 1,290 31% Total trip generation November 2013 a 1,107 1,106 2,213 2,499 1,993 4,492 100% a Existing Condition ITE-based trip generation b : 3,714 4,768 3,714 2013 counts percentage of ITE estimates: 60% 94% 60% Source: Based on counts from 2013 New England Executive Park Draft Environmental Impact Report November 2013 traffic data collection. b Source: Table 2. As shown in Table 7, the previously observed weekday evening peak hour driveway volumes at the Burlington Mall were only 60-percent of the levels estimated using ITE data. However, during the Saturday midday peak hour the driveway volumes were approximately 94-percent of the level expected based on the ITE data. Regardless, for consistency, this current study s procedure of estimating trip generation using ITE data for both existing and proposed conditions is appropriate as the same methodology and database is used for both scenarios. With the overall mall trip generation not expected to increase, the trip distribution patterns shown in Table 7 should remain relatively unchanged. The traffic counts indicated that the westerly Burlington Mall Road driveway (opposite Meadow Road) is used by roughly 13-percent of the total Site entering/exiting traffic. Likewise, the Middlesex Turnpike right-in/right-out driveway is used by approximately 6-percent of the overall Site traffic. In conjunction with the 2013 data collection, capacity analyses also were conducted at the Burlington Mall Road/Meadow Road/Sears driveway intersection. The analysis results (provided for reference in the Appendix to this document) indicated that this location was projected to operate at an overall level-of-service (LOS) D during both the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under the 2018 Build condition from that study. This indicates acceptable delays and overall operating conditions could be expected for that condition. The analysis also indicated that all of the entering and exiting movements to and from the mall were expected to operate at the same acceptable LOS D. VHB also recently conducted turning movement counts for this intersection during the midday peak period on Saturday, March 10, 2018. The counts are provided for reference in the appendix to this document, and are generally consistent \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 13 with the previously conducted 2013 traffic counts at this location. Accordingly, with no increase in Site trip generation or notable changes in trip distribution, these same LOS D operating conditions can be expected in conjunction with the Project. Further, this location is part of a recently-installed adaptive signal system along the and Burlington Mall Road. Under this system, each signal operates in a coordinated manner, and also responds to actual traffic conditions on a cycle-by-cycle basis without strictly relying on more rigid pre-established timing plans. This system will be able to readily handle any potential minor changes in arrival/departure patterns to maintain the acceptable LOS D conditions noted earlier. Conclusion VHB has evaluated the potential changes in traffic generation resulting from the repositioning of the Burlington Mall. This assessment considered multiple different methods for estimating potential changes in trip generation. These involved considering the overall reduction in building area resulting from the Project, as well as the somewhat unique former Sears TBA use and the additional restaurant uses being introduced to the Site. Following these industry-accepted methodologies, the Project will result in a reduction in the volume of peak-hour traffic visiting the Site under weekday and Saturday conditions. This conclusion is the same whether the mall is considered as a single overall entity including restaurants (which is the standard industry practice), or if the restaurants are considered separately based on either building area or seating. While the Project will reduce the peak-hour trip generation it is possible that other times of day could see minor increases or changes in patterns resulting from the new restaurants uses. These would most likely occur during the midday lunchtime period, or later into the evening after retail activity already has peaked. A graph depicting the likely hourly distribution of a fast-casual restaurant compared to standard retail uses is provided in the appendix to this document (Figure 1). These minor changes in traffic patterns should be readily accommodated by the primary signalized Site access driveways. The signals at these locations are part of a recently-installed adaptive signal system along the and Burlington Mall Road corridors. With this system, each of the signals operates in a coordinated manner, and now also responds to actual traffic conditions on a cycle-by-cycle basis without strictly relying on more rigid pre-established timing plans. This system will be able to readily handle the minor changes noted above through its ongoing adaptive changes to timings throughout the day. With this infrastructure in place, and the critical peak-hour Project trip generation being reduced, additional off-site analysis or improvements are not necessary. As part of the Project the proponent will be making changes to the mall access drive extending from Burlington Mall Road to the east of the former Sears TBA building. These improvements will involve eliminating the median on this roadway and providing only a single entering lane from Burlington Mall Road into the Site. The existing exclusive leftand right lanes for exiting traffic will remain unchanged so that the overall signal operation will not be affected. A new crosswalk also will be provided across this access aisle immediately south of the Sears TBA curb cut. Improved signage and striping will be provided at the internal four-way, Stop-controlled intersection between Sears and the former Sears TBA building. The existing curbline on the westerly side of this aisle will be shifted to the east by approximately 18-feet, which will provide a more-pedestrian-friendly environment. As noted earlier, the Sears TBA parcel currently \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 14 has two curb cuts on the east/west circulation aisle extending from to the corner of the Sears building. These will be consolidated into a single driveway to be located approximately 120 feet to the west of the four-way Stop intersection noted above. Eliminating the easterly driveway, which is in close proximity to this intersection, will help minimize conflicts at that location. Likewise, the westerly driveway for this parcel currently is slightly offset from another internal mall circulation aisle extending to the south to the main mall parking area. Eliminating that curb cut also should help to improve conditions at that location by eliminating conflicting traffic associated with the Sears TBA redevelopment. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

ATTACHMENTS Trip Generation o Method 1 o Method 2 o Method 3 Internal Trip Sharing Burlington Mall Traffic Counts Hourly Trip Generation Variation 2013 Capacity Analysis Results \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx 101 Walnut Street PO Box 9151 Watertown, MA 02472-4026 P 617.924.1770

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 16 Trip Generation \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 17 o Trip Generation Method 1 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Proposed: proposed mall GLA retail 1,229,671 proposed mall GLA restaurant 50,348 4% new restaurants represent this percent increase in total Burlington Mall leasable area total mall GLA 1,280,019 Existing: existing mall GLA 1,280,605 existing TBA 48,216 Total existing mall GLA + TBA 1,328,821-48,802 Considering Burlington Mall as a single overall shopping center; existing restaurants to remain unchanged. Proposed Existing Difference Retail/Restaurant Retail Auto Total LUC 820 820 942 SIZE 1,280,019 1,280,605 48,216 1,328,821 Weekday Daily Enter 17,018 17,023 572 17,595-577 Exit 17,018 17,023 572 17,595-577 Total 34,035 34,046 1,144 35,189-1,154 Weekday Morning Peak Hour Enter 491 491 72 563-72 Exit 301 301 37 338-37 Total 792 792 108 901-109 Weekday Evening Peak Hour Enter 1,721 1,721 61 1,783-62 Exit 1,864 1,865 67 1,931-67 Total 3,585 3,586 128 3,714-129 Saturday Daily Enter 21,649 21,655 572 22,227-578 Exit 21,649 21,655 572 22,227-578 Total 43,298 43,311 1,144 44,454-1,156 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Enter 2,412 2,413 61 2,474-62 Exit 2,227 2,227 67 2,294-67 Total 4,639 4,640 128 4,768-130 1 Trip generation estimate based on ITE LUC. \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation Method 1 - mall 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1280.019 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 48,321 24,160 24,160 34,035 17,018 17,018 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,203 746 457 792 491 301 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,877 2,341 2,536 3,585 1,721 1,864 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 59,034 29,517 29,517 43,298 21,649 21,649 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,760 2,995 2,765 4,639 2,412 2,227 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 27,008 13,504 13,504 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,571 1,750 1,821 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation 820_Pr_Method_1 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1280.605 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 48,343 24,171 24,171 34,046 17,023 17,023 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,204 746 457 792 491 301 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,879 2,342 2,537 3,586 1,721 1,865 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 59,062 29,531 29,531 43,311 21,655 21,655 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,763 2,997 2,766 4,640 2,413 2,227 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 27,021 13,510 13,510 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,573 1,751 1,822 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation 820_Ex_Method_1 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Automobile Care Center LANDUSE CODE: 942 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 48.216 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY - - - - - - - - - - AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 6 0.65 2.83 1.93 5.74 17 8 40 56% 44% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 6 0.71 3.51 2.75 7.15 17 8 40 49% 51% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 6-2.25 1.20 5.30 17 8 40 66% 34% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 6 0.83 3.11 1.87 5.65 17 8 40 48% 52% DAILY N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 136 76 60 99 55 43 PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 169 83 86 127 62 65 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 108 72 37 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 150 72 78 128 61 67 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 2-23.72 15.87 28.20 31 22 40 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR - - - - - - - - - - DAILY 1,144 572 572 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 2 11.88 2.59 17.18 31 22 40 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR - - - - - - - - - DAILY 573 286 286 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation Automobile_Service_Center_942 5/15/2018

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 18 o Trip Generation Method 2 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Proposed: proposed mall GLA retail 1,229,671 proposed mall GLA restaurant 50,348 total mall GLA 1,280,019 Existing: existing mall GLA 1,280,605 existing TBA 48,216 Total existing mall GLA + TBA 1,328,821 Proposed Existing Difference Proposed Retail Proposed New Restaurant Existing Retail - shared trips Total External Trips Total new: 50,348 Restaurant - shared trips Total External Trips Total External Trips Retail Auto Total LUC 820 932 931 Total Total 820 942 SIZE 1,229,671 37,761 12,587 50,348 1,280,019 1,280,605 48,216 1,328,821 Weekday Evening Peak Hour Enter 1,670 121 1,549 229 66 295 50 245 1,794 1,721 61 1,783 11 Exit 1,809 50 1,759 140 32 173 121 52 1,811 1,865 67 1,931-120 Total 3,480 171 3,309 369 98 467 171 296 3,605 3,586 128 3,714-109 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Enter 2,337 121 2,216 215 79 295 76 219 2,435 2,413 61 2,474-40 Exit 2,157 76 2,081 207 55 262 121 141 2,222 2,227 67 2,294-72 Total 4,494 197 4,297 423 134 557 197 360 4,657 4,640 128 4,768-111 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation Method 2 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1229.671 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 46,420 23,210 23,210 33,119 16,559 16,559 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,156 717 439 767 475 291 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,685 2,249 2,436 3,480 1,670 1,809 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 56,712 28,356 28,356 42,234 21,117 21,117 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,534 2,877 2,656 4,494 2,337 2,157 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 25,946 12,973 12,973 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,431 1,681 1,750 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation 820_Pr_Method_2 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1280.605 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 48,343 24,171 24,171 34,046 17,023 17,023 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,204 746 457 792 491 301 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,879 2,342 2,537 3,586 1,721 1,865 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 59,062 29,531 29,531 43,311 21,655 21,655 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,763 2,997 2,766 4,640 2,413 2,227 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 27,021 13,510 13,510 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,573 1,751 1,822 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation 820_Ex_Method_2 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Quality Restaurant LANDUSE CODE: 931 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 12.587 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 10 83.84 33.45 139.93 9.00 5.00 16.00 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 12 4.47 0.87 10.38 8.00 4.80 16.00 80% 20% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 15 8.28 2.66 15.90 9.00 4.80 16.00 61% 39% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 7 0.73 0.25 1.60 10.00 7.00 16.00 80% 20% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 19 7.80 2.62 18.68 9.00 4.80 16.00 67% 33% DAILY 1,055 528 528 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 56 45 11 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 104 64 41 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 9 7 2 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 98 66 32 N/A N/A N/A SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 6 90.04 53.63 126.78 10.00 5.00 16.00 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 7 10.68 5.75 15.29 10.00 5.75 15.29 59% 41% DAILY 1,133 567 567 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 134 79 55 N/A N/A N/A SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 6.00 71.97 41.38 120.59 10.00 5.00 16.00 0.50 0.50 PEAK OF GENERATOR 6.00 7.80 4.69 12.06 10.00 5.00 16.00 0.63 0.37 DAILY 906 453 453 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 98 62 36 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation Quality_Restaurant_931 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant LANDUSE CODE: 932 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 37.761 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 50 112.18 13.04 742.41 5.00 1.50 12.00 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 60 14.04 1.74 112.49 6.00 1.50 12.00 57% 43% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 61 17.41 3.04 89.99 5.00 1.50 12.00 52% 48% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 39 9.94 0.76 102.39 5.00 1.50 12.00 55% 45% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 107 9.77 0.92 62.00 6.00 1.00 13.50 62% 38% DAILY 4,236 2,118 2,118 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 530 302 228 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 657 342 316 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 375 206 169 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 369 229 140 N/A N/A N/A SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 3 122.40 1001.99 173.07 6.00 4.50 8.50 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 22 11.19 1.63 50.40 5.00 2.50 12.00 51% 49% DAILY 4,622 2,311 2,311 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 422.5 215.5 207.0 N/A N/A N/A SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 2 142.64 119.62 164.43 5.00 4.80 5.10 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 3 25.83 9.81 43.20 4.00 2.50 5.10 55% 45% DAILY 5,386 2,693 2,693 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 975 536 439 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation High_Turnover_932 5/15/2018

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 19 o Trip Generation Method 3 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

Proposed: proposed mall GLA retail 1,229,671 proposed mall GLA restaurant N/A (seats) total mall GLA 1,229,671 Existing: existing mall GLA 1,280,605 existing TBA 48,216 Total existing mall GLA + TBA 1,328,821 Proposed Existing Difference Proposed Retail Proposed New Restaurant Existing Retail - shared trips Total External Trips Total new: 1,915 Restaurant - shared trips Total External Trips Total External Trips Retail Auto Total LUC 820 932 931 Total Total 820 942 SIZE 1,229,671 1,436 479 1,915 1,280,605 48,216 1,328,821 Weekday Evening Peak Hour Enter 1,670 172 1,498 344 75 419 86 333 1,831 1,721 61 1,783 48 Exit 1,809 86 1,723 259 37 296 172 124 1,848 1,865 67 1,931-83 Total 3,480 258 3,222 603 112 715 258 457 3,679 3,586 128 3,714-35 Saturday Midday Peak Hour Enter 2,337 197 2,140 403 78 481 119 362 2,502 2,413 61 2,474 28 Exit 2,157 119 2,038 358 54 412 197 215 2,253 2,227 67 2,294-41 Total 4,494 316 4,178 761 132 893 316 577 4,755 4,640 128 4,768-13 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats Method 3 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1229.671 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 46,420 23,210 23,210 33,119 16,559 16,559 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,156 717 439 767 475 291 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,685 2,249 2,436 3,480 1,670 1,809 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 56,712 28,356 28,356 42,234 21,117 21,117 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,534 2,877 2,656 4,494 2,337 2,157 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 25,946 12,973 12,973 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,431 1,681 1,750 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats 820_Pr_Method_2 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Shopping Center LANDUSE CODE: 820 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: FLOOR AREA (KSF): 1280.605 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 147 0.76 37.75 7.42 207.98 453 9 1,510 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 47 0.71 3.00 0.70 23.74 323 8 1,320 54% 46% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 53 0.76 4.21 0.78 27.27 298 7 1,320 50% 50% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 84 0.90 0.94 0.18 23.74 351 9 1,510 62% 38% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 261 0.82 3.81 0.74 18.69 327 2 2,200 48% 52% DAILY 48,343 24,171 24,171 34,046 17,023 17,023 AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 1,204 746 457 792 491 301 PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 4,879 2,342 2,537 3,586 1,721 1,865 SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 58 0.71 46.12 13.07 167.89 602 56 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 119 0.87 4.50 1.42 15.10 416 4 1,510 52% 48% DAILY 59,062 29,531 29,531 43,311 21,655 21,655 PEAK OF GENERATOR 5,763 2,997 2,766 4,640 2,413 2,227 SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 30 21.10 4.15 148.15 509 47 1,510 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 24 2.79 0.39 12.40 382 47 1,268 49% 51% DAILY 27,021 13,510 13,510 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 3,573 1,751 1,822 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats 820_Ex_Method_2 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: Quality Restaurant LANDUSE CODE: 931 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: Seats: 479 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY nal RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range DAILY 6 0.59 2.60 1.83 4.01 345.00 275.00 475.00 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 9 0.15 0.04 0.34 278.00 95.00 475.00 69% 31% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 10 0.29 0.18 0.44 272.00 95.00 475.00 59% 41% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 5 0.02 0.01 0.04 355.00 275.00 475.00 - - PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 11 0.28 0.14 0.50 344.00 160.00 475.00 67% 33% DAILY 1,040 520 520 1,113 556 556 AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 60 41 19 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 116 68 48 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 8 #VALUE! #VALUE! N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 112 75 37 N/A N/A N/A SATURDAY nal RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range DAILY 6 0.54 2.57 1.53 4.12 345.00 275.00 475.00 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 7 0.33 0.16 0.50 325.00 210.00 475.00 59% 41% DAILY 1,028 514 514 1,081 0 0 PEAK OF GENERATOR 132 78 54 N/A N/A N/A SUNDAY nal RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range DAILY 6.00 0.71 2.05 1.66 2.47 345.00 275.00 475.00 0.50 0.50 PEAK OF GENERATOR 6.00 0.59 0.22 0.19 0.30 345.00 275.00 475.00 0.63 0.37 DAILY 820 410 410 820 410 410 PEAK OF GENERATOR 88 55 33 86 54 32 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats Quality_Restaurant_931 5/15/2018

ITE TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEET (10th Edition, Updated 2017) LANDUSE: High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant LANDUSE CODE: 932 Independent Variable --- SETTING/LOCATION: General Urban/Suburban JOB NAME: Seats: 1436 JOB NUMBER: WEEKDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 1 4.37 4.37 4.37 148 148 148 50% 50% AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 7 0.59 0.18 1.70 167 70 250 60% 40% PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 12 0.73 0.37 2.09 144 70 250 52% 48% AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 9 0.48 0.30 0.76 155 110 190 52% 48% PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 16 0.42 0.16 1.73 142 70 250 57% 43% DAILY 6,276 3,138 3,138 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK OF GENERATOR 847 508 339 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK OF GENERATOR 1,048 545 503 N/A N/A N/A AM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 689 358 331 N/A N/A N/A PM PEAK (ADJACENT ST) 603 344 259 N/A N/A N/A SATURDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 1 5.60 5.60 5.60 148 148 148 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 8 0.53 0.16 1.88 112 70 150 53% 47% DAILY 8,043 4,022 4,022 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 761 403 358 N/A N/A N/A SUNDAY Directional RATES: Total Trip Ends Independent Variable Range Distribution DAILY 1 3.87 3.87 3.87 148 148 148 50% 50% PEAK OF GENERATOR 2 0.63 0.32 1.08 124 100 148 55% 45% DAILY 5,558 2,779 2,779 N/A N/A N/A PEAK OF GENERATOR 905 498 407 N/A N/A N/A \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats High_Turnover_932 5/15/2018

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 20 Internal Trip Sharing \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

SHARED TRIPS RETAIL - RESTAURANT WEEKDAY EVENING SATURDAY MIDDAY RETAIL % # BALANCED # % RESTAURANT RETAIL % # BALANCED # % RESTAURANT EXIT -> 29% 1,809 50 173 29% -> ENTER EXIT -> 29% 2,157 76 262 29% -> ENTER ENTER <- 50% 1,670 121 295 41% <- EXIT ENTER <- 50% 2,337 121 295 41% <- EXIT TOTAL SHARED TRIPS - WEEKDAY EVENING TOTAL SHARED TRIPS - SATURDAY MIDDAY ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL Retail 121 50 171 Retail 121 76 197 Restaurant 50 121 171 Restaurant 76 121 197 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation Method 2 - Shared Trips 5/15/2018

SHARED TRIPS RETAIL - RESTAURANT WEEKDAY EVENING SATURDAY MIDDAY RETAIL % # BALANCED # % RESTAURANT RETAIL % # BALANCED # % RESTAURANT EXIT -> 29% 1,809 86 296 29% -> ENTER EXIT -> 29% 2,157 119 412 29% -> ENTER ENTER <- 50% 1,670 172 419 41% <- EXIT ENTER <- 50% 2,337 197 481 41% <- EXIT TOTAL SHARED TRIPS - WEEKDAY EVENING TOTAL SHARED TRIPS - SATURDAY MIDDAY ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL Retail 172 86 258 Retail 197 119 316 Restaurant 86 172 258 Restaurant 119 197 316 \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\ssheets\Traffic\Trip Generation_seats Medhod 3 - Shared Trips 5/15/2018

Ref: 13482.01 May 15, 2018 Page 21 Burlington Mall Traffic Counts \\MAWALD\ld\13482.01 Simon Burlington\docs\memos\Traffic evaluation - revised.docx

81 Burlington Mall Driveway 35 392 November 2013 volumes from New England Executive Park DEIR (June 2014)

November 2013 volumes from New England Executive Park DEIR (June 2014)

143 Burlington Mall Driveway 137 1147 November 2013 volumes from New England Executive Park DEIR (June 2014)

November 2013 volumes from New England Executive Park DEIR (June 2014)

115 108 110 170 645 127 70 490 118 58 53 116 # = March 10, 2018 Turning movement counts November 2013 volumes from New England Executive Park DEIR (June 2014)

Client: Engineer: Site Code: Date: PDI Job Number: City, State: VHB V. Kalikiri 10344 Sat 11/23 thru Tues 11/26/13 133623 Burlington, MA