ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2

Similar documents
Often, in this class, we will analyze a closed-loop feedback control system, and end up with an equation of the form

APPM 2360 Section Exam 3 Wednesday November 19, 7:00pm 8:30pm, 2014

EE C128 / ME C134 Midterm Fall 2014

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

Entrance Exam, Differential Equations April, (Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems) y + 2y + y cos(x 2 y) = 0, y(0) = 2, y (0) = 4.

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014

Pole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2

Final: Signal, Systems and Control (BME )

Math 331 Homework Assignment Chapter 7 Page 1 of 9

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

ECE 602 Exam 2 Solutions, 3/23/2011.

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Control Systems Design

Problem Points Problem Points Problem Points

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1

Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9

22.2. Applications of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL

Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli

6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN

Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 14, am. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 334 # 6 # 7 # 13 # 15 # 14

to have roots with negative real parts, the necessary and sufficient conditions are that:

Math Ordinary Differential Equations

Modern Control Systems

LMIs for Observability and Observer Design

Department of Mathematics IIT Guwahati

Do not write below here. Question Score Question Score Question Score

Before you begin read these instructions carefully.

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING

Discrete and continuous dynamic systems

Computer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control

21 Linear State-Space Representations

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

ME 132, Fall 2017, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 317. G 1 (s) = 3 s + 6, G 2(s) = s + 2

Problem Set 5 Solutions 1

Integral action in state feedback control

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Automatic Control A. A.A. 2016/2017 July 7, Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Meccanica. Prof. Luca Bascetta.

EL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)

Review Problems for Exam 2

Some solutions of the written exam of January 27th, 2014

Identification Methods for Structural Systems

APPM 2360: Final Exam 10:30am 1:00pm, May 6, 2015.

agree w/input bond => + sign disagree w/input bond => - sign

LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control

5. Observer-based Controller Design

Lecture 1 From Continuous-Time to Discrete-Time

MATH UN1201, Section 3 (11:40am 12:55pm) - Midterm 1 February 14, 2018 (75 minutes)

Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli

Math 53 Final Exam, Prof. Srivastava May 11, 2018, 11:40pm 2:30pm, 155 Dwinelle Hall.

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Problem Weight Total 100

MATH 251 Examination II April 7, 2014 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Calculus C (ordinary differential equations)

Full-State Feedback Design for a Multi-Input System

State Predictive Model Following Control System for the Linear System with Input Time-Delay

Module 07 Controllability and Controller Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Module 03 Linear Systems Theory: Necessary Background

State Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules

DON T PANIC! If you get stuck, take a deep breath and go on to the next question. Come back to the question you left if you have time at the end.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.

MAT292 - Calculus III - Fall Solution for Term Test 2 - November 6, 2014 DO NOT WRITE ON THE QR CODE AT THE TOP OF THE PAGES.

Exam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Class 7 Preclass Quiz on MasteringPhysics

Introduction to Controls

Math 20D Final Exam 8 December has eigenvalues 3, 3, 0 and find the eigenvectors associated with 3. ( 2) det

1. The Transition Matrix (Hint: Recall that the solution to the linear equation ẋ = Ax + Bu is

Module 08 Observability and State Estimator Design of Dynamical LTI Systems

Time Response of Systems

STUDENT NAME: STUDENT SIGNATURE: STUDENT ID NUMBER: SECTION NUMBER RECITATION INSTRUCTOR:

MA 527 first midterm review problems Hopefully final version as of October 2nd

Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

sc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11

EE363 homework 7 solutions

This homework will not be collected or graded. It is intended to help you practice for the final exam. Solutions will be posted.

1 Systems of Differential Equations

Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Model Reduction for Unstable Systems

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Last name: First name: Signature: Student number:

EC Control Engineering Quiz II IIT Madras

ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II 1/67

Physics 2514 Lecture 22

Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter

Study guide - Math 220

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft

Non-homogeneous equations (Sect. 3.6).

Math 51 Second Exam February 23, 2017

ECE504: Lecture 8. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 28-Oct-2008

Transcription:

ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2 # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 Total NAME 14 10 8 6 14 8 60 Rules: 1. 2 sheets of notes allowed, 8.5 11 inches. Both sides can be used. 2. Calculator is allowed. Keep it in plain view on the desk next to you. 3. No laptops, phones, headphones, pads, tablets, or any other such device may be out. If such a device is seen after 1:10PM, your test will be confiscated, and you will get a 0 for the exam. 4. Sit with at least one open space between every student 5. The exam ends promptly at 2:00 PM. 6. Stop working, and turn in exams when notified. Facts: 1. 3rd order stability test: The roots of the third-order polynomial λ 3 + a 1 λ 2 + a 2 λ + a 3 all have negative real-parts if and only if a 1 > 0, a 3 > 0 and a 1 a 2 > a 3. 2. The characteristic polynomial of the 1st order (vector) differential equation ẋ(t) = Ax(t) is det(λi n A), where n is the dimension of x. 1

1. Remark: This is not a hard problem. Do not be scared off by the long description. A state-estimator, E, is a dynamical system that attempts to estimate the internal state x of a system G, by observing only the inputs, u, and outputs, y, of G. The estimator does not have access to the initial condition, x(0) of the process. The system G is assumed to be governed by a known, linear, state-space model, namely ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t) y(t) = Cx(t) Since A, B, C are known, and the estimator has access to u and y, the strategy is that the estimator should be a mathematical copy of the process G, with state ˆx. The goal is to get ˆx to converge to x, asymptotically in time (regardless of u). Hence, it makes sense that the estimator s input should be the same input as the process (u), and the state, ˆx, inside the estimator, should be adjusted in some manner proportional to the difference between the process output y, and the estimator s prediction of y, in a way that makes ˆx(t) x(t) 0 as t, regardless of u and x(0). A diagram of such a system is shown below. Note that the estimator E has two inputs, receiving both u and y, and produces one output, namely producing the estimate, x est = ˆx of x. u B ẋ x C y A G B ˆx ˆx L C ŷ + xest A E All boxed quantities, A, B, C, L, F are matrices. The boxes labeled are integrators (note the signal definitions for x and ˆx and their time derivatives). All summing junction sign conventions, unless otherwise marked, are positive. 2

(a) Define z(t) := [ x(t) ˆx(t) Fill in the matrices below, to complete the state-space model which governs the entire (process and estimator) system ż(t) = ] z(t) + u(t) and x est (t) = [ ] z(t) (b) Define the estimation error, e as e(t) := x(t) ˆx(t). Show that e satisfies a simple, linear differential equation, whose right-hand side only involves, A, C, L and e. (c) What is one important property that the matrix L must have in order for ˆx(t) x(t) 0 as t, regardless of u, x(0) and ˆx(0)? (d) What are some issues that are not addressed here, that might impact (and distinguish among) several various choices for L? 3

2. Suppose 0 < ξ < 1 and ω n > 0. Consider the system ÿ(t) + 2ξω n ẏ(t) + ω 2 ny(t) = ω n u(t) subject to the initial conditions y(0 ) = 0, ẏ(0 ) = 0, and the unit-step forcing function, namely u(t) = 0 for t = 0, and u(t) = 1 for t > 0. Show that the response is y(t) = 1 ( ) 1 ξ 2 e ξωnt sin 1 ξ2 ω n t Hint: Recall that the set of all real-valued homogeneous solutions of ÿ(t) + 2ξω n ẏ(t) + ( ) ( ) ωny(t) 2 = 0 is y H (t) = Ae ξωnt cos 1 ξ2 ω n t + Be ξωnt sin 1 ξ2 ω n t where A and B are any real numbers. 4

3. Consider the 2-state system governed by the equation ẋ(t) = Ax(t). Shown below are the phase-plane plots (x 1 (t) vs. x 2 (t)) for 4 different cases. Match the plots with the A matrices, and correctly draw in arrows indicating the evolution in time. A 1 = [ 2 0 3 1 ] [, A 2 = 1 3 3 1 ] [ 3 2, A 3 = 1 0 ] [ 1 3, A 4 = 3 1 ] 5 4 2 x2 0 x2 0 2 5 5 0 5 x1 5 4 4 2 0 2 4 x1 5 x2 0 x2 0 5 5 0 5 x1 5 5 0 5 x1 5

4. (a) What is the general form of the solution to the differential equation ẍ(t) + 6ẋ(t) + 5x(t) = 0 (b) What is the general form of the solution to the differential equation ẍ(t) + 6ẋ(t) + 5x(t) = 10 Your expressions both should have two free constants. 6

5. A first-order process, with state x, input u, disturbance d and output y is governed by ẋ(t) = x(t) + u(t) + d(t), y(t) = x(t) (a) Is the process stable? (b) Suppose x(0) = 3, and u(t) = d(t) 0 for all t 0. What is the solution y(t) for t 0. (c) A PI (Proportional plus Integral) controller is proposed Define the state-vector q as u(t) = K P [r(t) y(t)] + K I z(t) ż(t) = r(t) y(t) q(t) := [ x(t) z(t) Write the state-space model of the closed-loop system, with state q, inputs (d, r) and outputs (y, u). ] 7

(d) What is the closed-loop characteristic polynomial? (e) For what values of K P and K I is the closed-loop system stable? (f) The closed-loop system is 2nd order. What are the appropriate values of K P and K I so that the closed-loop system eigenvalues are described by ξ = 0.8, ω n = 0.5? (g) What are the appropriate values of K P and K I so that the closed-loop system eigenvalues are described by ξ = 0.8, ω n = 1.0? (h) What are the appropriate values of K P and K I so that the closed-loop system eigenvalues are described by ξ = 0.8, ω n = 2.0? 8

6. A 2nd-order, unstable process, with control input u, disturbance input d, and output y, is governed by the equation ÿ(t) + ẏ(t) y(t) = u(t) + d(t) A PI (Proportional plus Integral) controller is proposed, both to stabilize the system, and provide good disturbance rejection, Here r is a reference input. u(t) = K P [r(t) y(t)] + K I z(t) ż(t) = r(t) y(t) (a) Using just the controller equations, express u(t) in terms of r, ṙ, y and ẏ. (b) By differentiating the process equation, and substituting, derive the closed-loop differential equation relating r and d (and possibly their derivatives) to the output variable y (and its derivatives). The variable u should not appear in these equations. (c) Using the 3rd-order test for stability, determine the conditions on K P and K I such that the closed-loop system is stable. 9