The Concentration of 236 Pu Daughters in Plutonium for Application to MOX Production from Plutonium from Dismantled US Nuclear Weapons

Similar documents
The Radiological Hazard of Plutonium Isotopes and Specific Plutonium Mixtures

Preparation of Pure Plutonium Metal Standards for Nondestructive Assay

Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AT THE CNS (Y-12 AND PANTEX) NUCLEAR DETECTION AND SENSOR TESTING CENTERS (NDSTC)

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

m w n? r i OF,THISDOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED

A Few-Group Delayed Neutron Model Based on a Consistent Set of Decay Constants. Joann M. Campbell Gregory D. Spriggs

Simulation of Double-Null Divertor Plasmas with the UEDGE Code

The Graphite Isotope Ratio Method (GIRM): A Plutonium Production Verification Tool

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

Parametric Instabilities in Laser/Matter Interaction: From Noise Levels to Relativistic Regimes

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

12/16/95-3/15/96 PERIOD MULTI-PARAMETER ON-LINE COAL BULK ANALYSIS. 2, 1. Thermal Neutron Flux in Coal: New Coal Container Geometry

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

Use of Gamma Rays from the Decay of 13.8-sec "Be to Calibrate a Germanium Gamma Ray Detector for Measurements up to 8 MeV

Abstract of paper proposed for the American Nuclear Society 1997 Winter Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico November 16-20, 1997

: Y/LB-16,056 OAK RIDGE Y-12 PLANT

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

Modified Kriging: Evaluation, Modification, Recommendations

IMAGING OF HETEROGENEOUS MATERIALS BY. P. Staples, T. H. Prettyman, and J. Lestone

ASTER CONF-~W OSTI MAY DISTRIBUTION OF THIS

Application of Spectral Summing to Suspect Low Level Debris Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

ASTER. Dose Rate Visualization of Radioisotope Thermoelectric. Generators. RECElVED BEC OF THIS DOCUMEMT IS UNLlMIi L, Hanford Company

A Germanium Detector with Optimized Compton Veto for High Sensitivity at Low Energy

Los Alamos. OF nm LA-"'- Title: HYBRID KED/XRF MEASUREMENT OF MINOR ACTINIDES IN REPROCESSING PLANTS. S. T. Hsue and M. L.

c*7 U336! On Satellite Constellation Selection LA MS ^«fc ^Xiyy PLEASE RETURN TO:

On the HalfiLife of LABORATORY ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL. and Particle Astrophysics Nuclear Science and Physics Divisions

A TER. Observation of Xe with the PNNL ARSA System PNNL UC-7 13

HEAT TRANSFER AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSES OF A GLASS BEAM DUMP

ORNL/TM-2002/118 Plutonium Production Using Natural Uranium From the Front-End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

The Evaluation of Program ISOTOPIC to Nondestructively Quantify Uranium and Plutonium Samples at the Joint Research Center in Ispra, Italy

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

~ _- IDOCLRXKT DMSP SATELLITE DETECTIONS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. J. Terrell, NIS-2 P. Lee, NIS-2 R W.

Meraj Rahimi, JAI Co. Dale Lancaster, TRW Environmental Safety Systems

Comparison of Several Detector Technologies for Measurement of Special Nuclear Materials i

LA-UR- Title: Author(s): Submitted to: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Measurement of Low Levels of Alpha in 99M0Product Solutions

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

FRAM V5.2. Plutonium and Uranium Isotopic Analysis Software

A Two-Dimensional Point-Kernel Model for Dose Calculations in a Glovebox Array. D. E. Kornreich and D. E. Dooley

Safety Considerations for Laser Power on Metals in Contact with High Explosives-Experimental and Calculational Results

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

Evaluation of the Total-Evaporation Method for Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Uranium and Plutonium Safeguards Samples: Report of Phase I

AEC Research and Development REPORT

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

LLNL DATA COLLECTION DURING NOAAETL COPE EXPERIMENT

Modeling of MHD Equilibria and Current Profile Evolution during the ERS Mode in TFTR

Los Alamos IMPROVED INTRA-SPECIES COLLISION MODELS FOR PIC SIMULATIONS. Michael E. Jones, XPA Don S. Lemons, XPA & Bethel College Dan Winske, XPA

J. C. Batchelder', K. S. Toth2, D. M. Moltz3, E. F. Zganjarl, T. J. Ognibene3, M. W. Rowe3, C. R. Binghan12.~,J. Powell3, and B. E.

SPHERICAL COMPRESSION OF A MAGNETIC FIELD. C. M. Fowler DISCLAIMER

C o f l F - 9m307-- SPREADSHEET APPLICATION TO CLASSIFY RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SHIPMENTa. A. N. Brown

Los Alamos. Nova 2. Solutions of the Noh Problem for Various Equations of State Using Lie Groups LA-13497

M. S. Krick D. G. Langner J. E. Stewart.

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

Impurity Transport Studies of Intrinsic MO and Injected Ge in High Temperature ECRH Heated FTU Tokamak Plasmas

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

John Falconer Richard Noble

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

SOME ENDF/B-VI MATERLALS. C. Y. Fu Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee USA

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

Library of uranium and plutonium reference spectra Introduction

S.A. Kreek J.E. Kammeraad D. Beckedahl G.J. Schmid J.J. Blair B. Payne A. Friensehner

Quarterly Report April 1 - June 30, By: Shirley P. Dutton. Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC22-95BC14936

Further Investigation of Spectral Temperature Feedbacks. Drew E. Kornreich TSA-7, M S F609

DISCLAIMER. and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Reactors and Fuels. Allen G. Croff Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ret.) NNSA/DOE Nevada Support Facility 232 Energy Way Las Vegas, NV

PRACTICAL GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ASSAY TECHNIQUES FOR LARGE VOLUME LOW-LEVEL WASTE BOXES

Solid Phase Microextraction Analysis of B83 SLTs and Core B Compatibility Test Units


Turbulent Scaling in Fluids. Robert Ecke, MST-10 Ning Li, MST-10 Shi-Yi Li, T-13 Yuanming Liu, MST-10

Ray M. Stringfield Robert J. Kares J. R. Thomas, Jr.

MULTIGROUP BOLTZMANN FOKKER PLANCK ELECTRON-PHOTON TRANSPORT CAPABILITY IN M C N P ~ ~ DISCLAIMER

Application of Spectral Summing to Indeterminate Suspect Low-Level Drums at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Neutron Detector Gamma Insensitivity Criteria

FUSION TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

GA A22689 SLOW LINER FUSION

&OAE- 9b I 0 IS& - - I Determination of Plutonium in Urine: Evaluation of Electrothermal Vaporization Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy.

Start-up Noise in 3-D Self-AmpMed

0STI. E. Hammerberg, XNH MD SIMULATIONS OF DUSTY PLASMA CRYSTAL FORMATION: PRELIMINARY RESULTS M. J. S. Murillo, XPA

UNIT OPERATIONS AND CHEMICAL PROCESSES. Alan M. Krichinsky

The photoneutron yield predictions by PICA and comparison with the measurements

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

Safety analyses of criticality control systems for transportation packages include an assumption

TOWARDS EVEN AND ODD SQUEEZED NUMBER STATES NIETO, MICHAEL M

Optimization of NSLS-II Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors: from Photoemission type to Diamond Detector. P. Ilinski

Verification of fissile materials

Partial Discharge Characterization of High-Voltage Cables and Components

GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D

Distinguishing fissions of 232 Th, 237 Np and 238 U with beta-delayed gamma rays

GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY

Transcription:

LA-13762-MS Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The Concentration of 236 Pu Daughters in Plutonium for Application to MOX Production from Plutonium from Dismantled US Nuclear Weapons Los Alamos N A T I O N A L L A B O R A T O R Y Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by the University of California for the United States Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36.

An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government, or any agency thereof. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness.

LA-13762-MS Issued: May 2001 The Concentration of 236 Pu Daughters in Plutonium for Application to MOX Production from Plutonium from Dismantled US Nuclear Weapons Thomas E. Sampson* Teresa L. Cremers** *Safeguards Science and Technology, Group NIS-5 **Pit Disassembly and Nuclear Fuels Technologies, Group NMT-15 Los Alamos N A T I O N A L L A B O R A T O R Y Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

THE CONCENTRATION OF 236 PU DAUGHTERS IN PLUTONIUM FOR APPLICATION TO MOX PRODUCTION FROM PLUTONIUM FROM DISMANTLED US NUCLEAR WEAPONS by Thomas E. Sampson and Teresa L. Cremers ABSTRACT The isotope 236 Pu in the weapons-grade plutonium to be used in the US MOX (mixedoxide) plant is of concern because the daughter products of 236 Pu are sources of highenergy gamma rays. The 208 Tl daughter of 236 Pu emits intense, high-energy gamma rays that are important for radiation exposure calculations for plant design. It is generally thought that the concentrations of 236 Pu and its daughters are well below 10-10, but these concentrations are generally below the detection limits of most analytical techniques. One technique that can be used to determine the concentration 208 Tl is the direct measurement of the intensity of the 208 Tl gamma rays in the gamma-ray spectrum from plutonium. Thallium-208 will be in equilibrium with 228Th, and may very well be in equilibrium with 232 U for most aged plutonium samples. We have used the FRAM isotopic analysis software to analyze dozens of archived high-resolution gamma ray spectra from various samples of US and foreign plutonium. We are able to quantify the ratio of minor isotopes with measurable gamma-ray emissions to the major isotope of plutonium and hence, through the measurement of the plutonium isotopic distribution of the sample, to elemental plutonium itself. Excluding items packaged in fluoropolymer vials, all samples analyzed with 240 Pu < 9% gave 228 Th/Pu ratios < 3.4 e-012 and all samples of USproduced plutonium, including 240 Pu values up to 16.4 %, gave 228 Th/Pu ratios < 9.4 e- 012. None of these values is significant from a radiation dose standpoint. Introduction The isotope 236 Pu in weapons-grade plutonium to be used in the US MOX (mixed-oxide) plant is of concern to plant designers because the daughter products of 236 Pu are sources of high-energy gamma rays. The daughter 208 Tl decays emitting several intense highenergy gamma rays that have a maximum energy of 2614 kev. The intensity of these high-energy gamma rays is important for radiation exposure calculations for plant design. It is generally thought that the concentrations of 236 Pu and its daughters are well below 10-10, but these concentrations are generally below the detection limits of most analytical techniques. One technique that can be used to determine the concentration 208 Tl is the direct measurement of the intensity of the 208 Tl gamma rays in the gamma-ray spectrum from plutonium. Thallium-208 gamma rays at 583, 860, and 2614 kev are visible in the gamma-ray spectrum from US weapons-grade plutonium. 1

Thallium-208 is at the end of the decay chain starting at 236 Pu and itself decays to stable 208 Pb. The characteristics of this decay chain are dominated by the first three elements in the chain. The longest half-life in the decay between 228 Th and 208 Tl is 3.6 days. 236 Pu--2.85y! 232 U --72y! 228 Th--1.91y!..! 208 Tl ---3m! 208 Pb (stable) Thallium-208 will be in equilibrium with 228 Th and may very well be in equilibrium with 232 U for most aged plutonium samples. Measurement Approach We have used the Los Alamos FRAM isotopic analysis [1-3] software to analyze dozens of archived high purity germanium (HPGe) detector gamma-ray spectra from various samples of US and foreign plutonium. With this software, we are able to quantify the ratio of minor isotopes with visible gamma-ray emissions to the major isotope of plutonium and, hence, through the measurement of the plutonium isotopic distribution of the sample, to elemental plutonium itself. These measurements are performed on arbitrary samples, in arbitrary measurement geometry. The measurements use fundamental nuclear constants in the analysis and do not require calibration. Our archival spectra have been acquired over an energy range from 0 to 1024 kev and do not contain the 2614 kev gamma ray from 208 Tl. However, the 583 and 860 kev gamma rays of 208 Tl are present and detectable in most of the archival spectra. We express the daughter product concentration in terms of the ratio of 228 Th/Pu because 208 Tl is in decay equilibrium with 228 Th. Table I displays the emission percentages per decay of the strongest gamma rays from the decay of 228 Th and its daughters. We analyzed the 583 kev 208 Tl gamma ray because it is the most easily detectable gamma ray in the energy range from 0 to 1024 kev. The 212 Pb gamma ray at 238.6 kev is slightly more intense, but is much harder to detect because the background continuum is much higher at 238 kev than at 583 kev. Table I The Principal Gamma Rays from the Decay of 228 Th and its Daughters Isotope Energy (kev) Emission % per 228 Th Decay 212 Pb 238.63 43.5 208 Tl 583.187 30.6 208 Tl 860.56 4.50 208 Tl 2614.5 35.86 2

The low level of the 208 Tl gamma-ray emissions and interference from other gamma rays complicate the analysis of the spectra in the 583 kev region. Over all of the spectra examined, we find three contributions in this region. They are listed in Table II. Table II Gamma Rays in the 583 kev Region from Plutonium Samples Energy (kev) Source of Gamma Ray Comment 582.89 583.03 583.187 239 Pu Correct for 239 Pu contribution by the ratio of the intensity of this peak to known 239 Pu gamma ray at 646 kev. 22 Na resulting from 19 F(α,n) 22 Na Interfering peak arising from fluorine impurities or fluorine-containing packaging. From the fitting process used, the fluorine contribution, if present, gives an artificially high value to the 228 Th concentration. These cases are easily seen in the fits and will be noted in the results table. 208 Tl Gamma ray in question. Analysis of Gamma Rays in 583 kev Region The three gamma rays listed in Table II form a single broad peak and cannot be resolved visually. We analyze this region in the following manner: the component from 239 Pu at 582.89 kev is easily determined using the measured intensity of the companion gamma ray from 239 Pu at 645.94 kev and the known intrinsic intensities (branching ratios) and relative detection efficiencies of the two gamma rays. The component from 208 Tl at 583.187 kev is fit with a response function placed at that energy. The peak fitting method used in the FRAM code is not sensitive enough to give accurate results for both the 22 Na (fluorine) and 208 Tl contributions if they are considered as free peaks. The two peaks are separated by only 0.16 kev (1.3 channels at the 0.125 kev/ch gain of the archival data). Therefore, we choose to ignore the fluorine, leaving the 583.187 kev 208 Tl peak as the only free peak in the fitting. The presence of fluorine will give a 208 Tl contribution that is too large a fail-safe result for these analyses. The extra contribution from fluorine is easily seen when examining the details of the peak fitting at 583 kev. The figures below demonstrate the fitting for different fluorine and 208 Tl contributions. The graphs in Figs. 1-3 have a Y axis scale of counts and an X axis scale of channel number. The values at the extremes of both axes are noted in the figures. The text at the bottom of each window denotes the channel number, energy in kev, and counts at the channel of the cross hair cursor in each picture. 3

Fig. 1. These two figures show the 583 kev region from sample 4, a weapons-grade plutonium sample with 6% Pu-240 and a very small Tl-208 content. The top picture shows the envelope of the fit of the two peaks. The individual components are shown in the bottom picture. The smaller component is the 583.187 kev gamma ray from Tl-208, while the larger component is the 582.89 kev peak from Pu-239. The energy of the channel denoted by the cross hair is shown at the bottom of each frame. No fluorine is seen in this spectrum. Fluorine, if present, would show up as excess counts on the low-energy side of the peak. This spectrum yields a Th-228/Pu ratio of 4.3 e-013. Fig. 2. These two figures show the 583 kev region from sample 21, a medium burnup sample (12% Pu-240) with a moderate Tl-208 content that is influenced by a fluorine contribution. The top picture shows the envelope of the fit of the two peaks. The excess counts to the left of the fitted response function are the contribution from fluorine. The individual components are shown in the bottom picture. The larger component is the 583.187 kev gamma ray from Tl-208, while the smaller component is the 582.89 kev peak from Pu-239. The Tl-208 component is influenced by the fluorine, as it is the only free peak in the fit. The energy of the channel denoted by the cross hair is shown at the bottom of each frame. In this spectrum the cross hair is at the approximate energy of the 583.03 kev from fluorine. This spectrum yields a Th-228/Pu ratio of 5.0 e-012 that clearly overestimates the ratio because of the presence of fluorine. 4

Fig. 3. These two figures show the 583 kev region from sample 14, a low burnup sample (9% Pu-240) with a very strong fluorine contribution arising from its Kel-F vial. The top picture shows the envelope of the fit of the two peaks. The excess counts to the left of the fitted response function are the contribution from fluorine. The individual components are shown in the bottom picture. The larger component is at the energy of the 583.187 kev gamma ray from Tl-208, while the smaller component is the 582.89 kev peak from Pu-239, and is barely seen. The Tl-208 component is dominated by the fluorine as Tl-208 is the only free peak in the fit. The energy of the channel denoted by the cross hair is shown at the bottom of each frame. In this spectrum the cross hair is at the approximate energy of the 583.03 kev gamma ray from fluorine. This spectrum yields a Th-228/Pu ratio of 1.7 e-010 that clearly overestimates the ratio because of the presence of fluorine. The actual Th-228/Pu ratio cannot be determined in this spectrum. Fig. 4. These two figures show the 583 kev region from sample 11, a medium burnup sample (12% Pu-240) with a moderate Tl-208 content. The top picture shows the envelope of the fit of the two peaks. There is no fluorine contribution seen here. The individual components are shown in the bottom picture. The larger component is the 583.187 kev gamma ray from Tl-208, while the smaller component is the 582.89 kev peak from Pu- 239. The energy of the channel denoted by the cross hair is shown at the bottom of each frame. In this spectrum the cross hair is at the approximate energy of the 583.19 kev gamma ray from Tl-208. This spectrum yields a Th-228/Pu ratio of 6.7 e-012 that is believed to be accurate because of the absence of fluorine. 5

Pu-236 Concentration A Meaningless Specification The US government s contract with the builders of the MOX plant specifies that the 236 Pu concentration in the plutonium input should be less than 10-9 relative to plutonium. However, the 236 Pu concentration is meaningless because it is the 208 Tl daughter product concentration that is of importance. For most US weapons-grade plutonium, the 236 Pu concentration itself will have decayed by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude since its production because of its 2.85-year half-life. Weapons plutonium production stopped in 1988 in the US. By the planned 2007 startup date of the MOX plant, even this most recently produced plutonium will have a 236 Pu concentration 2 orders of magnitude less than when it was produced. A more pertinent specification would be the 232 U concentration, because its 72-year half-life is the rate-determining step for the 236 Pu decay. Note, however, that plutonium that has been reprocessed will have its 232 U removed, likely eliminating the major source for the 208 Tl isotope and its concomitant high-energy gamma rays. In general, the complex recycling process and lengthy time since production leaves only a small contribution from 208 Tl gamma emissions in most US weapons-grade plutonium. Results The results from the analysis of archival spectra are shown in Table III. The samples are grouped according to similar characteristics such as container, burnup of the plutonium, or impurity levels. We have analyzed all burnups available to us, although the weaponsgrade plutonium is of primary interest. We expect to see a higher 228 Th/Pu ratio as burnup increases. The ratios seen in the higher burnup plutonium provide a proof of principle for this study. The rather colloquial comments in the Any Fluorine? column can be viewed in the context of Figs. 1-4. 6

Table III Th-228/Pu Ratios in Plutonium Measured by Gamma Spectrometry No. Sample ID % Pu-240 Ratio: Th-228/Pu Any Fluorine? Comment 1 sgcoax8k.001 3.56 1.35 e-012 Very little 2 92coax8k.001 5.07 1.71 e-012 Very little Pu dates from 1968 or before 3 86coax8k.001 5.19 3.41 e-012 Very little Pu dates from 1970 or before 4 calex30pb.101 5.86 4.3 e-013 None seen Pu dates from 1979 or before 5 j1325pb1.101 5.82 Too low to analyze None seen Metal dating from 1979 6 pueu730.101 5.98 2.2 e-012 Very little Oxide from Los Alamos 7 pueu7pb.101 5.98 1.7 e-012 None seen Same sample through Pb shielding, different date 8 std830.101 6.43 1.04 e-012 Very, very little Pu dates from at least 1976 9 std8pb.101 6.43 8.1 e-013 Very, very little Same sample through Pb shielding, different date 10 sd4030.101 11.76 7.8 e-012 Very little FFTF oxide, higher concentration probably real, sample dates from 1980 11 sd4030pb.101 11.76 6.7 e-012 None seen Same sample through Pb shielding 12 lao225pb.101 16.44 2.1 e-012 Very little FFTF oxide, through lead shielding, sample dates from 1982 13 lao22530.101 16.44 3.16 e-012 Very little Same sample without lead, different date 14 2g118cx8.001 8.90 1.71 e-010 Large F peak seen Sample in KelF vial, ratio not valid 15 2g119cx8.001 11.81 2.28 e-010 Large F peak seen Sample in KelF vial, ratio not valid 16 2g120cx8.001 14.51 1.60 e-009 Large F peak seen Sample in KelF vial, ratio not valid 17 2g121cx8.001 16.86 4.06 e-010 Large F peak seen Sample in KelF vial ratio not valid. Same Pu as lao225 above 18 iso3cx8k.001 3.56 4.19 e-013 None seen 19 iso6cx8k.001 5.97 1.38 e-012 Very little 20 iso9cx8k.001 6.81 1.38 e-012 Very little 21 iso12c8k.001 12.03 5.01 e-012 Somewhat more 22 iso15c8k.001 15.86 9.42 e-012 Somewhat more Higher Th-228 probably real 7

No. Sample ID % Pu-240 Ratio: Th-228/Pu Any Fluorine? Comment 23 93coax8k.001 6.31 8.62 e-013 Very little International reference standard from Europe 24 84coax8k.001 14.36 4.41 e-012 Some F contribution International reference standard from Europe 25 70coax8k.001 19.18 1.21 e-010 None seen International reference standard from Europe. Large ratio is likely real. 26 61coax8k.001 25.69 2.30 e-010 None seen International reference standard from Europe. Large ratio is likely real. 27 lao250pb.001 16.36 9.88 e-013 None seen Pure PuO 2 28 252c10pb.001 16.18 1.26 e-012 None seen Pure PuO 2 29 253c10pb.001 16.40 1.40 e-012 None seen Pure PuO 2 30 261c10pb.001 16.44 1.12 e-012 None seen Pure PuO 2 31 peo381pb.001 10.40 4.37 e-012 None seen Impure PuO 2 32 382dpb.001 9.49 4.90 e-012 None seen Impure PuO 2 33 peo447pb.001 9.93 4.67 e-012 None seen Impure PuO 2 34 srp121pb.001 11.72 3.65 e-012 Very little Discussion The first 13 samples consist of Los Alamos plutonium of various 240 Pu isotopic fractions, mostly weapons grade. These samples do not show any significant contribution from the fluorine (α,n) reaction, therefore, we believe that all of the 228 Th/Pu ratios are valid. The values of the ratio for weapons-grade plutonium range from none detectable to 3.4 e-12. At these levels, the 208 Tl daughter peaks are very, very weak and of no consequence whatsoever for dose considerations as seen in Fig. 5. As seen in Table I, the accompanying 2614 kev 208 Tl gamma ray of concern for dose calculations has an intrinsic intensity that is 36/30 times that of the 583 kev line marked in Fig. 5. Samples 14-17 consist of PuO 2 packaged in Kel-F (polychlorotrifluoroethylene) vials. This plastic contains fluorine and the gamma-ray spectra from these four items shows a 583 kev peak contribution that is 2 to 3 orders of magnitude greater than most other samples. The FRAM analysis has not been configured to differentiate between the fluorine and the 208 Tl contributions, so the ratios for these four samples may not be used to characterize 228 Th/Pu. Note that sample 17 in this set contains the same plutonium as samples 12 and 13. Sample 17, influenced by the Kel-F vial, yields a 228 Th/Pu ratio that is more than 2 orders of magnitude greater than those measured for samples 12-13. The next set of samples, 18-22, form a set of PuO 2 samples used for NDA analyses in NIS-5. The two highest burnup samples, 21-22, exhibit a somewhat higher ratio than the three lower burnup samples that closely bracket weapons-grade plutonium specifications. The two highest burnup samples have 228 Th/Pu ratios consistent with those for samples 10-11. 8

583.18 kev 208 Tl Fig. 5. Gamma-ray spectrum from sample 6 with 228 Th/Pu = 2.2 e-012, a typical number for weapons-grade plutonium found in this analysis. The 583 kev 208 Tl peak is marked with the cross hair and arrow. The intensity of this peak is insignificant. Samples 23-26 form a set of internationally certified reference materials used for characterizing nondestructive plutonium isotopic measurements. Samples 23-24 are consistent with other low burnup plutonium. Samples 25-26 have significantly higher 228 Th/Pu ratios than any other valid data shown here. These ratios are believed to be real, i.e., no fluorine is present. These samples were produced in Europe, not in US production reactors, and have higher burnup than any other samples in the table. The spectrum of the highest burnup sample, 26, is shown in Fig. 6. Samples 27-30 are part of a set of pure PuO 2 standards used in the NIS-5 training program. Although these have higher burnup than most of the other samples, they exhibit 228 Th/Pu ratios consistent with those from weapons-grade plutonium. Samples 31-34 have lower burnup than 27-30 but higher 228 Th/Pu values. These values are still only slightly higher than those from weapons-grade plutonium. 9

583.18 kev 208 Tl Fig. 6. Gamma ray spectrum from sample 26 with 228 Th/Pu ratio = 2.3 e-010, the highest ratio found in this analysis. The 583 kev 208 Tl peak is marked with the cross hair and arrow. Its intensity is not significant compared with the multitude of plutonium gamma rays. This sample is of European origin and is of a burnup far in excess of weapons grade specifications. Future Work More spectra will be obtained from actual Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System (ARIES) product oxide. There is no reason to believe that the results will be any different, but the analysis of actual ARIES oxide will give us further confidence in these results. Summary We have analyzed gamma-ray spectra from 30 different plutonium-bearing items with the Los Alamos FRAM isotopic analysis software. The purpose of the analysis was to determine the fraction, relative to plutonium, of thorium daughters in the plutonium for application to radiation dose calculations. Excluding samples with fluorine in the sample vial, all samples (regardless of origin) analyzed with 240 Pu < 9% gave 228 Th/Pu ratios < 3.4 e-012 and all samples of US-produced plutonium including 240 Pu values up to 16.4% gave 228 Th/Pu ratios < 9.4 e-012. None of these values is significant from a radiation dose standpoint. ARIES Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System. This is the Los Alamos demonstration process to be used to produce the PuO 2. 10

References 1. Thomas E. Sampson, Plutonium Isotopic Composition by Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy: A Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-10750-MS (September 1986). 2. Thomas E. Sampson, George W. Nelson, Thomas A. Kelley, FRAM: A Versatile Code for Analyzing the Isotopic Composition of Plutonium from Gamma-Ray Pulse Height Spectra, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-11720-MS (December 1989). 3. T. E. Sampson and T. A. Kelley, PC/FRAM: A Code for the Nondestructive Measurement of the Isotopic Composition of Actinides for Safeguards Applications, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 48, 1543 (1997). 11

This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. It is available electronically on the Web (http://www.doe.gov/bridge). Copies are available for sale to U.S. Department of Energy employees and contractors from Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 (423) 576-8401 Copies are available for sale to the public from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22616 (800) 553-6847

Los Alamos N A T I O N A L L A B O R A T O R Y Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545