Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Similar documents
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

² 2015 Program Year. Farm Tract McLeod County, Minnesota 1:4, NHEL NHEL

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Fall River Valley Irrigated Farmland

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. BOWLSBEY 320 LIBERTY ISLAND ROAD BUYER: RASSMUSSEN TRUST

Carrick Road $798,000

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Hartmann Ranch. potential vineyard ground acres +/

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

TRACT 7: ±252 Acres Irrigated Farmland Grassland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Stevens County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Atlantic County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Washoe County, Nevada, South Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX


Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cumberland County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Transcription:

122 14' 27'' W () 122 13' 37'' W 40 8' 40'' N 564700 564800 564900 565000 565100 565200 565300 565400 565500 565600 565700 565800 40 8' 40'' N 4443400 4443500 4443600 4443700 4443800 4443900 4444000 4443400 4443500 4443600 4443700 4443800 4443900 4444000 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 40 8' 15'' N 564700 564800 564900 565000 565100 565200 565300 565400 565500 565600 565700 565800 40 8' 15'' N 122 14' 27'' W N Map Scale: 1:5,390 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 250 500 1000 1500 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 122 13' 37'' W Page 1 of 5

() MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons I II V I II III Soil Rating Lines I II V I II III Soil Rating Points I II V I II III Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Tehama County, California Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 13, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 21, 2015 Oct 7, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 2 of 5

Irrigated Capability Class Au CyB Cz Mh Irrigated Capability Class Summary by Map Unit Tehama County, California (CA645) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Arbuckle gravelly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Corning-Redding gravelly loams, 0 to 5 percent slopes Cortina coarse sandy loam, MLRA 17 Maywood silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 2 2.6 2.3% 4 0.9 0.8% 4 39.3 35.4% 1 52.1 46.9% Rr Riverwash 16.2 14.6% Totals for Area of Interest 111.1 100.0% Page 3 of 5

Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Page 4 of 5

Tie-break Rule: Higher Page 5 of 5