WEATHER DERIVATIVES - A NEW CONCEPT IN THE WEATHER INSURANCES NARCIS EDUARD MITU

Similar documents
Weather Risk Management. Salah DHOUIB Underwriter Paris Re

Weather Risk Management

One way to deal with the unpredictable costs of winter weather. By Shane Belvin

Weather Derivatives. AgBiz Insurance Workshop 08 October Raphael N. Karuaihe, PhD

Weather Derivatives-Pricing and Design Issue in India

Financial Management of Weather Risk with Energy Derivatives

Financial markets for weather

WEATHER INDEX- THE BASIS OF WEATHER DERIVATIVES

Speedwell Weather. Topics: Setting up a weather desk (a shopping list)

WEATHER DERIVATIVES: CONCEPT AND APPLICATION FOR THEIR USE IN SOUTH AFRICA

Commercialisation. Lessons learned from Dutch weather market

Allianz Risk Transfer. Weather Solutions

WEATHER DERIVATIVES AS A VEHICLE TO REALISE THE SKILL OF SEASONAL FORECASTS

Impact on Agriculture

World Meteorological Organization

LEGAL DISCLAIMER. APG Coin (APG) White Paper (hereinafter 'the White Paper', 'the Document') is presented for informational purposes only

Weather Company Energy and Power Products

Hosts: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada June 16-18,

Into Avista s Electricity Forecasts. Presented by Randy Barcus Avista Chief Economist Itron s Energy Forecaster s Group Meeting

A STOCHASTIC DAILY MEAN TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR WEATHER DERIVATIVES

Data Standard Specification. Draft v0.1. Contact:

J2.4 SKILLFUL SEASONAL DEGREE-DAY FORECASTS AND THEIR UTILITY IN THE WEATHER DERIVATIVES MARKET

MACRO-PRUDENTIAL RULES AND REGULATION (2015): DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS ANNEXURE I: FORMAT FOR ANNUAL DISCLOSURES DRUK PNB BANK LTD.

Penarth Master Issuer plc - Monthly Report November 2012 Combined Series Report For IPD Ending: 18 December 2012

DRIVING ROI. The Business Case for Advanced Weather Solutions for the Energy Market

QUALITATIVE RISK COVERAGE IN AGRICULTURE THROUGH DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS BASED ON SELYANINOV INDICES

Corporate Governance, and the Returns on Investment

Lakeland Court MHP Norton Rd Lakeland, FL 33809

April 23rd, By Jack Scoville

ZANER WHEN DOES WEATHER MATTER? For more information, call: Or visit: Zaner is proud to present

NatGasWeather.com Daily Report

Penarth Master Issuer plc - Monthly Report October 2012 Combined Series Report For IPD Ending: 19 November 2012

A sophisticated, yet easy to use, analysis platform for commodity and weather risk forecasting... climatepredictanalytics.com

WeatherManager Weekly

MARTINSON AG. Jan. 5, 2018 WHEAT

Sunshine City 47-Sp MHP

Rebate Report. $15,990,000 Public Finance Authority Charter School Revenue Bonds (Voyager Foundation, Inc. Project) Series 2012A

Information Bulletin 5/2007

WeatherManager Weekly

1 Introduction. Station Type No. Synoptic/GTS 17 Principal 172 Ordinary 546 Precipitation

Allianz Thailand Equity

SheerSense. Independent Distributor. Compensation Plan

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Composition of capital as of 30 September 2011 (CRD3 rules)

Operational MRCC Tools Useful and Usable by the National Weather Service

Information Bulletin 5/2010

Put the Weather to Work for Your Company

Hedging Maize Yield With Weather Derivatives. Geyser, J.M. & Van de Venter, T.W.G.

MARS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM GRADE: Grade 4

Study Project on the Development of Climate Option Pricing. Model in the Chinese Economy

PRICING AND PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC VARIABLES

Weather Company Energy and Power Products

Information Bulletin 10/2008

Information Bulletin 1/2008

Important Developments in International Coke Markets

AHEAD OF THE STORM: Extreme Weather Resilience in the City of Toronto

Weather Risk. Opening Game NYC. Winter Storms: China MFE 659 Background 2: Forecasting

Information Bulletin 2/2011

JRC MARS Bulletin Crop monitoring in Europe January 2016 Weakly hardened winter cereals

JRC MARS Bulletin Crop monitoring in Europe. December 2017 Hardening of winter cereals is delayed

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Information Bulletin 12/2003

Decision Models Lecture 5 1. Lecture 5. Foreign-Currency Trading Integer Programming Plant-location example Summary and Preparation for next class

Information Bulletin 9/2011

Supplementary Information: Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION BY MEANS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO ESTABLISH EARLY WARNING SYSTEM

March 19th, By Jack Scoville

Name of Bank BASEL III LEVERAGE RATIO REPORT As of 30 Sep 2018

CustomWeather Statistical Forecasting (MOS)

13 August Dear Shareholders UPDATE. I am writing to update shareholders on the profit impact of the recent poor harvest and associated matters.

Information Bulletin 11/2010

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU F CLASS FILING INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN MODEL

The Role of Weather in Risk Management For the Market Technician s Association October 15, 2013

WINTER MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT IN ESTONIA. Kuno Männik Director of Tartu Road Office Estonian Road Administration

Information Bulletin 11/2011

JRC MARS Bulletin Crop monitoring in Europe January 2019

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Opportunities and Priorities in a New Era for Weather and Climate Services

Information Bulletin 9/2007

Understanding Weather and Climate Risk. Matthew Perry Sharing an Uncertain World Conference The Geological Society, 13 July 2017

EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: SEPTEMBER 19, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sales

Information Bulletin 8/2009

FORECAST ACCURACY REPORT 2017 FOR THE 2016 NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT

Crop Monitoring in Europe WINTER CEREAL HARDENING IS PROGRESSING WELL. MARS BULLETIN Vol.20 No.12 (2012)

Probabilistic Decision-Making and Weather Assessment

Use of Seasonal forecasts in Electrical Load Prediction

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Internal Rate Of Return Model

Climate change in the U.S. Northeast

Development and Use of the Swedish Road Weather Information System

Topic 4 Forecasting Exchange Rate

Quantifying Weather Risk Analysis

Global Challenges - Partnering with Service Providers. World Meteorological Organization. J. Lengoasa WMO Deputy Secretary-General

JRC MARS Bulletin Crop monitoring in Europe. January 2017 Minor frost damages so far. Improved hardening of winter cereals in central Europe

Explain the impact of location, climate, natural resources, and population distribution on Europe. a. Compare how the location, climate, and natural

Transcription:

WEATHER DERIVATIVES - A NEW CONCEPT IN THE WEATHER INSURANCES NARCIS EDUARD MITU Narcis Eduard MITU, Lecturer, PhD. University of Craiova, Romania Keywords: weather derivative, risk management, HDD index, CDD index, weather insurance. Abstract: As the negative effects of climatic warming are more and more obvious, the demand for insurance solutions to cover the costs resulting from weather whims shall increase in direct ration with risk exposure. Although the situation might be interpreted as a business opportunity, in order to be able to offer the proper cover it is necessary to comply with fundamental demands regarding the weather risk insurance. Thus, when conceiving viable insurance solutions of the consequences intervened in case of a catastrophic event generated by harsh weather conditions we must take into consideration factors such as measurement possibility of the respective risk, in order to decide if this can or can not be accepted. Weather risk management is a quite new process wherethrough many businesses can have an advantage regarding the manner of weather effects handling, with positive results upon earnings and expenses. The weather risk management instruments are weather insurances and weather derivatives. Three transactions mark the beginning of the current weather risk market. So, early pioneers in the market energy traders Aquila, Enron, and Koch Industries conceived of and executed the first weather derivative transactions in 1997. The first deals were all arranged as privately-negotiated over-the-counter transactions and were structured as protection against warmer or cooler than average weather in specific regions for the winter or summer seasons. The innovative idea was based upon using weather forecast as an initial point for determining some trigger mechanisms called index, which actually represents borders or limits measured by statistic accounts which typically cover the temperature local variations, rainfalls or of other weather parameters, from one week to a whole season. Once identified the index, it shall represent the solution which makes weather risk become fungible. The three innovative companies performed or had connective liaisons with electric power field. As a consequence, we may say that electric power risk management introduced a class of risk management instruments which offer protection to risks due to goods level variation/services sold or bought, generated by average temperature changes on definite periods of time: weather derivatives. Jointed to price risk management instruments, these level protections increase the supplying potential of a risk superior management. Therefore, weather derivatives market has its roots in USA and has as an account the electric power industry privatization. Although weather conditions variability has always been acknowledged as one of the most important factors which affect the electric power consumption, the effects of unpredictable weather variations were, in the past, immersed and managed in a monopolist environment, controlled by government. Along with privatization, the varied participants to the production process, 1958

merchandising and supplying the electric power to domestic and industrial consumers had to confront the weather a new and significant risk, with an impact upon operational impacts. Beyond the obvious initial applications of weather derivatives for risk hedging in electric power field, the market expanded, referring to a wide diversity of weather risks, specific to other industrial fields. The transactions of the last years offered protection against this risk to companies from different fields such as entertainment, commerce, agriculture and constructions. Being very attractive for companies with background regarding financial instruments such as futures options and contracts, weather derivatives put the companies into the situation to fulfill the investors expectations and to make profit, by maintaining the cash-flow even under weather conditions unfavorable to their business [Pilipovic, 1998]. In many regards, weather derivatives market represents a convergence border between insurance market and bigger financial markets. Due to its increasing, the market attracted rapidly not only the involvement of electric power traders, but also the insurance-reinsurance companies, investment banks and hedging funds. In USA, the wide option basis issued by insurance companies supplied the necessary liquidity for developing the weather derivatives market. At the same time, investment and commercial banks saw in weather derivatives management products of financial risk which they could associate in crossed sale with other financial products used in the hedging of interest rate or exchange risk. Anyway, certain stock-exchange players, as well as hedging funds noticed the opportunities to trade weather derivatives on speculative bases. Nowadays, all three fields electric power commerce, insurances and capital markets are well represented both in issuing activity and also in dealing USA weather derivatives. There are in train introducing projects of weather derivatives for beer industry, other branches of food industry, eolian power producers, sugar industry and other branches. A sampling of weather risks faced by various industries is presented in the table below. The weather derivatives market also expanded rapidly outside USA, both in terms of covered risks and nationality of companies involved in the market. Among the countries where there have been accomplished dealings now rank Great Britain, France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Austria, Italy, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Japan and India. Among the important issuers of weather derivatives we can mention Guarantee Weather, Energy Koch (USA electric power traders) and banks such as Credit Lyonnais (Calyon), ABN AMRO Bank, Gensec Bank and so on. Presently, Chicago Commodity Exchange, which has am european branch office in London (Chicago Mercantile Exchange, CME) is the only place where one can make dealings with weather derivatives by Romanian natural or legal persons. For the moment contracts for reference weather stations in Romania are not available. But, together with attraction increase for these instruments, the matter shall be definitely solved. 1959

Table 1 Illustrative Links between Weather and Financial Risk Risk Holder Weather Type Risk Energy Industry Temperature Lower sales during warm winters or cool summers Energy Consumers Temperature Higher heating/cooling costs during cold winters and hot summers Beverage Producers Temperature Lower sales summers during cool Building Material Temperature/Snowfall Lower sales during severe Companies winters (construction sites shut down) Construction Companies Temperature/Snowfall Delays in meeting schedules during periods of poor weather Ski Resorts Snowfall Lower revenue during winters with below-average snowfall Agricultural Industry Temperature/Snowfall Significant crop losses due to extreme temperatures or rainfall Municipal Governments Snowfall Higher snow removal costs during winters with aboveaverage snowfall Road Salt Companies Snowfall Lower revenues during low snowfall winters Hydro-electric power Precipitation Lower revenue during periods generation of drought What is and how it works the weather derivative Weather derivative is a financial instrument used by companies to reduce the risk associated to unfavorable or unpredictable weather events evolutions. The derivative seller accepts the risk by cashing a bonus (derivative price). If the event doesn't take place, the seller makes a profit, but if the event takes place, the buying company cashes a preliminarily agreed amount. In USA, Europe and Australia, temperature, snowfall quantity, freeze expansion and rainfall quantity are key conditions for which corporations buy weather derivatives. The cost of a weather derivative depends on the probability of weather negative impact upon the business and duration of the contract concluded between the bank and corporative entity. A weather derivative is defined by many elements, as it follows: Reference weather station. All contracts of weather derivative type are based upon weather observations accomplished at one or more specified weather stations, accomplished by an entity certified by national weather authority of the state on which territory there are the respective stations. Most part of the dealings are based upon only one station, but some contracts are based upon a combination of reports from many stations, and others upon differences between the values noticed at two stations. The reference weather stations situation from european countries where dealings with weather derivatives are accomplished is the following: 1960

Country Number of meteorological Period stations Austria 1 1960 present France 1 1952 present Germany 46 1961 present Italy 15 1961 present Holland 9 1950 present Norway 1 1960 present Sweden 1 1961 present Spain 20 1960 present Great Britain 12 1959 present Source: http://www.climetrix.com Table 2 Index of a weather derivative defines the weather parameter which establishes when and how the payments agreed by contract shall be accomplished. The indexes most frequently used are Heating Degree Days (HDD) and Cooling Degree Days (CDD) which measure the cumulated variation of daily average temperature comparing to the level of 18 o C (65 Fahrenheit degrees) along a season. We must mention that other basic temperature levels may be adopted, for instance in Great Britain these are of 15,5 o C. The arithmetic expression used in order to determine the HDD and CDD is the following [Zeng, 2000]: N HDD = max( 0, 18 o C T ) () 1 i = 1 i N CDD = max( 0, T 18 o C) () 2 i = 1 i where, N represents the number of days for which a contract is developing; T i - arithmetic average of maximum (T max ) and minimum (T min ) thermic temperatures of day i. For instance, the daily accumulated CDD number is equal to the difference between the average temperature of the day and the value of 18 o C (65 Fahrenheit degrees), if the temperature is over 18 o C and to zero if the temperature doesn't exceed 18 Celsius degrees. If the average temperature of the day is under 18 o C (T base ), then the difference between 18 o C and average temperature of the day leads to HDD number, CDD and HDD values are never negative, being at least equal to zero. As a consequence, if T i shall be of 10 C when the HDD value for that day is of 8 (18 C - 10 C = 8 HDD), instead, if T i shall be of 20 C, then the HDD value is 0. In the same way there can also be determined the CDD value. If T i shall be of 20 C, then the CDD value is 2 (20 C - 18 C = 2 CDD), and if T i shall be of 10 C then the CDD value is 0. During a month there can be accumulated both CDD (during the days with average temperature over 18 degrees days with high temperature) and HDD also (during the days with average temperatures under 18 degrees days with low temperatures). The 1961

weather (options) derivatives are defined on HDD or CDD accumulation over a specific period. A wide range of indexes is used for the dealings restructuring which offer the most adequate hedging mechanisms for the users from different economic fields. Many dealings are based on the so-called event indexes, which count the number of days when the temperature exceeds or drops under a defined limit, during the contract. Similar indexes are used for other variables; for instance the rainfall accumulation or the number of days when the rainfall accumulation as snowfall exceeds a defined level. According to the most recent study of Weather Risk Management Association (WRMA) made by PricewaterhouseCoopers (June 2006) shows that HDD was, even in 2005, the most used dealing index with weather derivatives, while the number of contracts based on the CDD index was growing during 2005 comparing to 2004. 2005/6 2004/5 2003/4 2002/3 2001/2 HDD CDD Other Temp Rain Other 2000/1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fig. 1: Distribution of Number of Contracts by Type: 2000/1 2005/6 (Excludes CME trades) Term. All contracts have a defined day of beginning and termination, which define the period for which the specific index is calculated. The most frequent market terms are 1 st of November - 31 st of March for the winter contracts and 1 st of May - 30 th of September for the summer contracts. However, there has been noticed an increasing level of contracts for a month or a week, along with the market development. Certain contracts also specify various calculation proceedings of the index in the agreed term - such as weekends exclusion or the double share for the specified days in order to meet some individualized exposures. Structure. Weather derivatives are based on standard structures of the derivative financial instruments, such as put, call, swap, collar, straddle, strangle. The key attributes of these structures are: 1. Strike meaning the specific index value when the contract begins the payment; 2. Tick meaning the paid amount per growing unit of the index over strike; 3. Theoretical limit or value meaning the maximum payment stipulated by contract. Premium. The buyer of a weather option pays a premium to the seller that is typically between 10% and 20% of the theoretical amount of the contract. Still, the bonus may significantly vary depending on the risk profile of the contract. 1962

In order to exemplify, we may take into account a common shape of weather derivative, meaning the put option which offers protection to the effects of a warm winter. Such a dealing might look like this: Reference weather station: Chicago O Hare International Airport (WBAN #94846) Underlying index: Heating Degree Days Term: Nov. 1 Mar. 31 Structure: Put option Strike = 4.850 HDDs Tick size = $5.000 Limit = $1 million Premium $150.000 In this case, the issuer of the derivative is going to pay the buyer, in case if the season 1 st of November 31 st of March, the HDD index has a value lower than 4850, an amount equal to 4850 the total number of HDD multiplied with 5000$, but in any case no more than 1 million dollars. The HDD shall be as higher as the temperature is lower for several days, being the amount for the entire season of values 65 (Fahrenheit degrees) Ti. In this case Ti is the average temperature of a day i of the season, in terms of Fahrenheit degrees. The purchasing price (bonus) for this weather derivative is of 150 000 $. In the diagram below there can be noticed how the buyer looses the bonus derivative if the winter is cold (over 4850 HDD), in which case it is assumed that the estimated maximal operational profit is accomplished, and shall begin to cash money from the contract issuer if the season counts under 4850 HDD. Therefore, for seasonal values under 4650 HDD, the contract only ensures the limited amount, meaning a net profit (comparing to the bonus paid at purchase) of 850 000$. Payout 850.000$ Tick ($5.000/DD) (150.000$) 4.650 HDDs (limit) Index (HDDs) 4.850 HDDs (strike) Fig. 2: Contract payoff diagram (net of premium) 1963

In order to satisfy the non-electric power users' needs and to increase the variety of risk management capabilities at all participants service on the derivative products market, the range of available products on the American market significantly expanded, through a continuous innovation. Weather derivatives dealings may now be structured in order to cover almost any type of weather variable (temperature, falls rainfalls, snowfalls, wind speed, humidity, and so on), on terms between a week and several years and with payable amounts between a few thousand dollars for small risks and up to over 100 million dollars for much larger exposures. The trade on the weather derivative market took place at the beginning over-thecounter (OTC), in the shape of some contracts negotiated between legal entities, but starting with 2002 a continuous growing volume of standardized contracts weather derivatives type was enlisted on Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (LIFFE). The dealings volume growing for these contracts had positive impacts upon the market's cash flow and the prices establishment. Therefore, according to the study of Weather Risk Management Association (WRMA) made by PricewaterhouseCoopers, the weather derivatives market has continuously grown, emphasizing an evolution of about 3.900 dealings made during 2002, with an exposure of over 4,3 billion USD, to over 1.000.000 (1.041.439) dealings in 2006, with an exposure of over 45,2 billion USD (increasing from 9,7 billions in 2005): 1.200.000 1.000.000 800.000 600.000 400.000 200.000 0 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 Winter 2006 Summer 2005 Fig. 3: Number of Trades on the CME $50.000 $45.000 $40.000 $35.000 $30.000 $25.000 $20.000 $15.000 $10.000 $5.000 $0 2000/1 2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 Fig. 4: Total Notional Value of weather risk contracts: 2000-2005 (in millions of U.S. dollars) 1964 CME Winter CME Summer OTC Winter OTC Summer

In the same time, the study shows that both the OTC (over the counter) dealings number and the dealings volume made on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) grew rapidly during 2004-2006. The most part of the dealings are taking place in American companies, but the share of the dealings made by Asian and European companies grew after 2001. 2005/6 2004/5 2003/4 2002/3 2001/2 2000/1 0 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 NA West NA Mwest NA East NA South Asia Europe Other Fig. 5: Distribution of Total Number of Contracts by Region: 2000 2005 (Excluding CME Trades) Derivatives are different from insurances Weather derivatives are different from the insurances for weather calamities. Regarding the formers situation, the compensations are paid in case of goods prejudices, proved to have weather causes. The weather derivatives payment is based on the detected weather evolution, no matter how this has affected the owner of the derivative. You don't even have to own a sensitive weather business in order to buy or take advantage of the weather derivatives. As any other financial derivative instruments, these contracts can be bought and only with speculative purpose. Unlike insurances, which cover events with low probability rate of generation such as floods or calamitous draughts, weather derivatives cover the events having a higher probability rate of generation, such as a colder/wetter summer than normally. On the weather derivative market a participant who would take advantage of a very cold winter could meet another who made profit if the winter is gentle. These can protect each other for the weather risk (hedging), something that would not happen on the insurance market. The weather is changeable and unpredictable on long term. How can anybody offer protection for something so hazardous? The answer is simpler than we think. It is not necessary to forecast the weather in order to offer a business protection against the weather risk. The solution resides in finding capable partners willing to accept the weather risks, and this can be best done on a market which allows the weather derivatives dealings. As a consequence of the economic development of recent period, also in Romania shall become absolutely necessary this kind of instruments for risks control. 1965

REFERENCES 1. Cristea Mirela, Dracea Raluca, Buziernescu Radu (2007) Possible risk coverage in agriculture through agricultural insurances, Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Vol. 64 (1-2), pg. 427 432, Cluj-Napoca; 2. Pilipovic Dragana, (1998) - Energy Risk: Valuing and Managing Energy Derivatives, McGraw-Hill, S.U.A; 3. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2006) - Weather Risk Management Association, Survey Results, June; 4. Zeng Lixin, (2000) - "Weather Derivatives and Weather Insurance: Concept, Application, and Analysis", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, No. 9, Vol. 81. 1966