Bohr-Coster diagrams for multiply ionized states of light elements in the range Z--10 to 20

Similar documents
Group Members: Your Name In Class Exercise #6. Photon A. Energy B

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

Fine Structure Calculations of Atomic Data for Ar XVI

Energy systematics of vanadium Kα x-ray satellites and hypersatellites. R. L. Watson, V. Horvat, and Y. Peng

Lβ 1 satellites in X-ray emission spectra of 4d transition elements

Electron Spettroscopies

PHYS 202. Lecture 23 Professor Stephen Thornton April 25, 2005

Number of x-rays Energy (kev)

Teacher: Mr. gerraputa. Name: Base your answer to the question on the information below. Given the electron dot diagram:

A.P. Chemistry Practice Test - Ch. 7, Atomic Structure and Periodicity

X-Ray transitions to low lying empty states

PHYS 202. Lecture 23 Professor Stephen Thornton April 20, 2006

The Electronic Structure of Atoms

Describe the structure of the nucleus Calculate nuclear binding energies Identify factors affecting nuclear stability

Atomic Structure Ch , 9.6, 9.7

Test Review # 4. Chemistry: Form TR4-9A

Physics 100 PIXE F06

Atomic Structure Practice Questions

Pt L X-RAYS PRODUCTION CROSS SECTIONS BY 12 C, 16 O, 32 S AND 48 Ti ION-BEAMS IN THE MeV/u ENERGY RANGE *

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture #14

CHE CHEMICAL CONCEPTS AND STRUCTURE ELECTRONS IN ATOMS LECTURES Dr David J McGarvey

McCord CH301 Exam 2 Oct 10, 2017

Atomic Spectroscopy II

X-ray spectroscopy: Experimental studies of Moseley s law (K-line x-ray fluorescence) and x-ray material s composition determination

= : K A

Test Review # 5. Chemistry: Form TR5-8A. Average Atomic Mass. Subatomic particles.

R. Clark, D. Humbert, K. Sheikh Nuclear Data Section

Atomic structure and properties

Collegiate Institute for Math and Science Day 57: December 9, 2016 Room 427

THE NATURE OF THE ATOM. alpha particle source

The Shell Model This activity is modified from Chemistry: A Guided Inquiry (3/e) by R.S. Moog and J.J. Farrell, Wiley, 2006.

Electronic Structure of Atoms and the Periodic table. Electron Spin Quantum # m s

Atomic Structure and Atomic Spectra

UNIT VIII ATOMS AND NUCLEI

Photon Interaction. Spectroscopy

Relative Abundance of Ions Yield. as the Result of 1s and 2p Shell Ionization. in Potassium and Calcium Atoms

Which order of statements represents the historical development of the atomic model? A) C D A B B) C D B A C) D B A C D) D B C A

Problems with the Wave Theory of Light (Photoelectric Effect)

UNIT : QUANTUM THEORY AND THE ATOM

ATOMIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRONS, AND PERIODICITY

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Atomic Physics 3 rd year B1

4. Inelastic Scattering

McCord CH301 Exam 2 Oct 10, 2017

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

D) g. 2. In which pair do the particles have approximately the same mass?

Topic 2 : Atomic Structure

4. The mass of a proton is approximately equal to the mass of A an alpha particle C a positron. B a beta particle D a neutron

Atomic Structure. 1. For a hydrogen atom which electron transition requires the largest amount of energy?

Sample Copyright. Academic Group ATOMIC STRUCTURE 1. Topics covered in this chapter:

Within the vast field of atomic physics, collisions of heavy ions with atoms define

CHEMISTRY 110 EXAM 1 SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 FORM A

Topic 3: Periodic Trends and Atomic Spectroscopy

Production of Highly Charged Ions in Neon Following Photoionization and Resonant Excitation

Particle Behavior of Light 1. Calculate the energy of a photon, mole of photons 2. Find binding energy of an electron (know KE) 3. What is a quanta?

Ch. 7- Periodic Properties of the Elements

Electron impact single ionization of copper

THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS PHYS2041 ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY

THE STRUCTURE OF ATOMS. ATOMS Atoms consist of a number of fundamental particles, the most important ones are...

Photoionization of excited states of neon-like Mg III

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Modern Atomic Theory and the Periodic Table

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

UNIT 2 PART 1: ELECTRONS

Particle Nature of Matter. Chapter 4

7.1 The Pauli Exclusion Principle

2. Which important property did mendeleev use to classify the elements in his periodic table and did he stick to that?

CHAPTER-3 CLASSIFICATION OF ELEMENTS AND PERIODICITY IN PROPERTIES OF ELEMENTS

Lecture 20 Auger Electron Spectroscopy

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Chemistry (

CHEMISTRY - BROWN 13E CH.7 - PERIODIC PROPERTIES OF THE ELEMENTS

1.1 Atomic structure. The Structure of the Atom Mass Spectrometry Electronic Structure Ionisation Energies

Name: Date: Atomic Structure 2017 Mrs. Mannion Version 1

Name: Block: Date: Atomic Radius: the distance from the center of the nucleus to the outer most electrons in an atom.

Atom Physics. Chapter 30. DR JJ UiTM-Cutnell & Johnson 7th ed. 1. Model of an atom-the recent model. Nuclear radius r m

8. Which of the following could be an isotope of chlorine? (A) 37 Cl 17 (B) 17 Cl 17 (C) 37 Cl 17 (D) 17 Cl 37.5 (E) 17 Cl 37

MODERN ATOMIC THEORY AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

where n = (an integer) =

When I lecture we will add more info, so leave spaces in your notes

Atomic Structure and Processes

Lecture 12 Multiplet splitting

Structure of the Atom. Thomson s Atomic Model. Knowledge of atoms in Experiments of Geiger and Marsden 2. Experiments of Geiger and Marsden

Vanden Bout/LaBrake/Crawford. Why are there no blue fireworks? LIGHT, ELECTRONS & QUANTUM MODEL. Important Information

Li or Na Li or Be Ar or Kr Al or Si

Trends in the Periodic Table

Chapter 9. Atomic structure and atomic spectra

THE EDUCARE (SIROHI CLASSES) TEST SERIES 2018

Systematization of L X-ray satellites I: Lα satellites

Chapter Test B. Chapter: Arrangement of Electrons in Atoms. possible angular momentum quantum numbers? energy level? a. 4 b. 8 c. 16 d.

Charge state distributions after sub-shells ionization in Lead atom

Name: Date: Blk: Examine your periodic table to answer these questions and fill-in-the-blanks. Use drawings to support your answers where needed:

Chapter Six: X-Rays. 6.1 Discovery of X-rays

1. (i) Calculate the number of electrons which will together weigh one gram. (ii) Calculate the mass and charge of one mole of electrons.

The Electronic Structures of Atoms Electromagnetic Radiation The wavelength of electromagnetic radiation has the symbol λ.

(a) Fill in the last two boxes in the table below to show the order in which the next two sub-shells are filled.

Because light behaves like a wave, we can describe it in one of two ways by its wavelength or by its frequency.

Chapter 3: Electron Structure and the Periodic Law

Unit 3. The Atom & Modern Atomic Theory

Classification s,p,d blocks

Transcription:

Pramhn.a-J. Phys., Vol. 29, No. 3, September 1987, pp. 253-260. Printed in India. Bohr-Coster diagrams for multiply ionized states of light elements in the range Z--10 to 20 LAKSH'MI NATARAJAN, A V TANKHIWALE and CHINTAMANI MANDE Department of Physics, Nagpur University, Nagpur 440010, India MS received 21 April 1987 Abstract. Calculations in the L-S coupling approximation of the average total energies of various defect electron configurations with single or double K shell and varying number of L shell vacancies for some light elements in the range Z = 10 to 20 are reported. The calculations show that the linear trend observed for normal Bohr-Coster diagrams ( x/e vs Z curves for the usual X-ray energy states) persists in the case of multiply ionized atomic states as well. Keywords. Bohr-Coster diagrams; defect electron configurations; multiply ionized atoms. PACS No. 32.20 1. Introduction The great regularity of X-ray spectral lines, first observed by Moseley (1913), led to the systematization of X-ray spectra and the understanding of the origin of X-ray emission and absorption processes. This work also enabled to arrive at the precise energy level values for the inner shells of all the atoms (Bearden and Burr 1967), a knowledge which is of fundamental importance. The diagrams which depict for the various X-ray lines the variation of x/c~ (where v represents the frequency of a particular spectral line for different elements and R is the Rydberg constant) with atomic number Z are usually called Moseley diagrams. Similar plots for the normal inner energy levels (sometimes also called X-ray levels, e.g. K, L~, Ln, etc, which denote the binding energy of the atoms singly ionized in the respective shells) showing the variation of square roots of energies with atomic number Z are usually referred to as Bohr-Coster diagrams in literature (Slater 1960; Kuhn 1964). To our knowledge, no such plots have been reported so far for the inner atomic states multiply ionized to different degrees. We have recently reported (Lakshmi Natarajan et al 1986a, b) the results of our theoretical calculations of the energies of satellites and hypersatellites for neon and magnesium. We thought it interesting to extend these calculations to some more light elements in the range Z = 10 to 20 in order to see if the linear trend observed in the case of Bohr-Coster diagrams persists for multiply ionized atomic states as well. Electron-ion as well as ion-ion collision processes have attracted considerable attention (Crandall 1983; Hahn 1985) in recent years because of their applications in astrophysical and fusion plasma studies. In such studies it has been shown that the multicharged ions play a more important role in the formation of intermediate excited 253

254 Lakshmi Natarajan, A V Tankhiwale and Chintamani Mande states than the singly charged ions. It seems therefore worthwhile to undertake a systematic study of the energy sequences of multiply ionized atoms. 2. Calculation of configurational average energies In our earlier publications (Lakshmi Natarajan et al 1986a, b) we have described the procedure for the calculation of the average energies of the different multiply ionized configurations of two light atoms, namely neon and magnesium, making use of screened hydrogenic wavefunctions. These calculations have enabled us to draw the energy level diagrams for these elements (Lakshmi Natarajan et al 1986b; Lakshmi Natarajan 1986) multiply ionized to different degrees in the K and L states, which in turn directly depict the transitions responsible for the K-LL satellites and hypersatellites. Our results for the energies of the satellite and hypersatellite lines in X-ray as well as Auger spectra are in good agreement with experimental data wherever available (Richard et al 1972; Kauffman et al 1973; Matthews et al 1973; Breuckman 1979). They also agree fairly well with the theoretical calculations of Bhalla et al (1973). It might be mentioned here that our method of calculation gives a better picture of the processes occurring in the inner atomic shells because of the analytical wavefunctions used. The average configurational energies of the neutral, singly ionized and multiply ionized atoms (sometimes called exotic atoms in literature) in the L-S coupling approximation can be calculated using the following expression due to Slater (1960) E.~ = El(nl) + for all electrons Y, interaction energies for pairs of electrons, (1) where l(nl ) is the one-electron energy integral. The electrostatic interaction energy integrals called the Slater-Condon parameters are given by Fk(nllt, n212)=e2f,, ~ =0 ~ J,2=oR"'ll(rOR"J2(r2) 2 2 -(r>) (r<) - k+ k~ rtr2drtdr2, 22 (2) and ~zt) Gk(nlll, nzl2) =e2 o~ drl=o J r2=o (r<) k R..la(rx)R.J2(rx),,k+ 1 [r>j x R.~ll(r2)R.:12(r2)r2r2drldr2, (3) where R,~It and R.212 are the radial parts of the hydrogenic wavefunctions. In order to calculate the values of the integrals Fks and Gks, one needs the numerical values of the effective charges for wavefunctions (Zou values) for different orbitals which were calculated by us using the procedure described in the earlier publications.

Bohr-Coster diagrams 255 Table 1. Effective Z values for different orbitals of elements in the range Z = 10 to 20. Effective charges for wave functions Element ls 2s 2p 3s 3p 4s Neon (10) 9.64 7.50 6"63 Magnesium (12) 11'52 9.25 8.48 4.95 Aluminium (13) 12.62 10.16 9'22 5.97 5.26 Silicon (14) 13'59 11.10 10'19 6.93 6-03 Argon (18) 17.67 14.76 13'95 10.57 9.28 Calcium (20) 19-63 16-13 16.06 12-59 t0.96 6-40 Table 2. Screening produced on an electron in the different shells. K L M Element by each by each by each by each by each by K K L K L M electron electron electron electron electron electron Neon (10) 0.36 0"75 0.27 Magnesium (12) 0.48 0.75 0.30 0.75 0.66 0.30 Aluminium (t 3) 0.38 0.75 0.32 0'80 0.70 0.27 Silicon (14) 0-41 0-75 0"33 0'80 0.71 0"23 Argon (18) 0.33 0-78 0.36 0"80 0.71 0"21 Calcium (20) 0-37 0"80 0"35 0-80 0"72 0.24 3. Results In table 1 we have tabulated our calculated values of Z ff for different orbitals of Ne, Mg, AI, Si, Ar and Ca. In table 2 are given the screenings produced by each electron in the K and L shells on the other electrons in the K, L and M shells respectively. In table 3 are given the average total energies of the different multiply ionized atomic states characterized by various electron defect configurations. 4. Discussion The energy of a normal X-ray state according to Bohr's theory is given by E = (Z - a)2/n 2, (4) where E is the energy of the state in Rydbergs, a the screening constant and n the principal quantum number. The slopes of the curves x/~ vs Z drawn for the K and L

256 Lakshmi Natarajan, A V Tankhiwale and Chintamani Mande Table 3. Average total energies of multiply ionized atomic states. Eaver,g e in ev Electron defect configuration lone 12Mg 13A1 lasi laar 20Ca 2p- l 21"9 47'9 78"5 111'3 249"9 367"9 2p -2 56"1 135"5 203"5 270"6 565"1 822"8 2p- 3 108'9 268"8 367'2 484"2 945"8 1~32"1 2p -4 200"3 431"1 576"9 739'8 1394'1 1933"9 2p -5 318'4 640"5 848"3 1047"2 1904"0 2681"9 2p -6 475"7 881"8 1128"8 1398"1 2503"0 3349"7 Is -1 868"8 1302"0 1562"3 1846"9 3206'4 4055'5 Is- 12p- l 905"8 1396"0 1697'3 2021'4 3540"7 4534'2 ls-12p -2 968"5 1534"7 1872'7 2248"1 3935"1 5068"0 ls-12p -3 1068-1 1712'8 2096"0 2517'2 4404"5 5691"7 Is- 12p-4 1196'3 1936'8 2377"3 2841'1 4928"6 6463"9 ls-12p -s 1369'5 2193"7 2674"9 3209"6 5556'7 7160"4 ls-12p -6 1571"7 2514"6 3060-1 3635"t 6220'6 7923"4 ls -2 1848'6 2749"0 3319"1 3905"3 6677"1 8381"6 ls-22p -1 1914"2 2898"0 3504"7 4143"9 7087"3 8945"1 ls-22p -2 2025"6 3087"1 3740"2 4428"7 7575"4 9592"5 ls-22p -3 2165"2 3323"8 4035"4 4770"3 8119"2 10388'4 ls-22p -4 2349"9 3597"8 4351"I 5155"8 8768"4 11120"7 ls-22p -s 2566"2 3936"5 4750"5 5597"2 9455"2 11913"6 states should be 1 and 1/2, since n = 1 and 2 respectively for these states. In order to see if (4) is valid for the multiply ionized states also, we have plotted in figure 1 the values of the square roots of the energies (in Rydbergs) for different multiply ionized states against atomic number. It is interesting to note that for the multiply ionized atomic states also, one obtains linear Bohr-Coster plots as for the singly ionized states. This linearity observed by us establishes the linear dependence of x/~ on Z even for the multiply ionized states. We may group the curves in figure 1 into three groups: the group A comprises of different atomic states multiply ionized in the 2p shell only, the group B comprises of the configurations with multiple ionization in the 2p shell together with single ionization in the ls shell and the group C refers to the states multiply ionized in the 2p shell and doubly ionized in the ls shell. We observe that with gradual increase in the degree of multiple ionization the slopes of the curves also increase progressively. It is interesting to note that in the groups B and C, the relative change in the slopes of the individual curves is small, which probably indicates that the effect of holes in the ls shell is large and the gradual increase of holes in the 2p shell for the individual curves produces only a small percentage change in their slopes. On the other hand in the group A of the curves corresponding to the states with no hole in the ls shell the gradual increase of holes in the 2p shell produces a larger percentage change from curve to curve. In table 4 we have given the values of the slopes of the curves plotted in figure 1. In figure 2, we have plotted these values as a function of np, the number of holes in the 2p

o -- VE in Rydbergs ----e- ro c~ o ~-~!Y ~," ~.~'~ ~_~.- ~..~ ~" o~ N ~. ~" ~. ~- co ~- 0,--] '--a~ ~~ 0 'o I I- N o I h) lu, I - ~I~ I~ r~ I I~ h) i~i I~) I~)

258 Lakshmi Natarajan, A V Tankhiwale and Chintamani Mande Table 4. Values of the slopes of the x/e vs Z curves. Electron defect Values of configuration slopes Slope- 1 = n* 2p:- 1 0'47 2" 14 2p -2 0"58 1"72 2p- a 0"70 1'42 2p- 4 0'80 1"25 2p- s 0"90 1-11 2p -~ 1"00 1.00 Is- 1 0"95 1'05 Is- 12p- 1 1"02 0'98 Is- 12p-2 1"11 0'91 ls-12p -3 1'17 0'85 Is- 12p-4 1"23 0'81 Is- 12p-S 1"29 0"77 Is- 12p-6 1"34 0'76 Is- 2 1"35 0'74 Is- Z2p- 1 1"41 0'71 Is- 22p- 2 1"47 0"68 Is- 22p- 3 1"54 0'65 ls-22p -4 1"59 0'63 Is- 22p- s 1"66 0'60 shell. In this figure the curve a corresponds to multiple'ionization in the 2p shell only, the curve b to single ionization in the ls shell and multiple ionization in the 2p shell, while the curve c corresponds to double ionization in the ls shell and multiple ionization in the 2p shell. We note that these plots are more or less similar to the E vs np plots (wheree is the energy of the satellite/hypersatellite line) reported by us earlier (1986a, b). We further note that the curves b and c are nearly parallel to each other which might probably be due to ionization in the Is shell in both the cases in addition to multiple ionization in the 2p shell. The curve a is not parallel to the b and c curves, most probably because in this case the ionization of the atoms occurs in the 2p shell with no ionization in the ls shell. It has been customary (White 1934) in optical spectra to write the following expression for the energy of the valence orbitals E = (Z - 0") 2 n, 2 (5) This expression is similar to (4) except that here n is replaced by n* = n-/l, where n* is called the effective principal quantum number and/~ the quantum defect. The latter is assumed to be arising out of the penetration of the outer orbitals into the core levels. The concept of the effective principal quantum number helps in defining accurately the energy of a state in the case of a complex atom. Drawing the analogy from the valence states to the case of inner multiply ionized states we have attempted to determine the values of n* from the energies of the multiply

Bohr-Coster diagrams 259 "J 6 (o)/o (b) O/,W T I,- z_ 4 t) ill _J 0 i- 5 b- 0 ~2 t~ @ f ~q 4 Z o. 1 c 0.5 1.0 1.5 SLOPES OF BOHR-COSTER DIAGRAMS " Figure 2. Plots between the slopes of the Bohr-Coster diagrams and n~, the number of holes in the 2p shell. The curve a corresponds to multiple ionization in the 2p shell only while the curves b and c respectively refer to multiple ionization in the 2p shell along with single or double ionization in the ls shell. ionized configurations. It must, however, be borne in mind that n* does not have the same physical origin in the two cases. In the case of our energy states which arise because of multiple ionisation in the K as well as L levels, the principal quantum number n is neither 1 nor 2, but gets non-integral values which are effective in describing the energies of the complex states. In table 4 we have therefore included the reciprocals of the slopes yielding n* for the different electron defect configurations. For the state ls 2p - t, i.e. the normal L X-ray level, the value of n* comes out to be very nearly 2 as expected, while for the configurations ls 2p -" the value of n* decreases from 2 to 1 as m increases from 1 to 6. Likewise, for the levels Is- 12p, ie the normal K X-ray level, the slope- 1 of the x/~ vs Z curve is found to be nearly 1 as expected, while for the Is- 12p-m and ls-22p -m states the values of n* gradually decrease from 1 to 0.6. It is interesting to mention here that Uchai et al (1986) have very recently calculated the energy shifts of the L X-ray satellites due to multiple M vacancies for the elements in the range Z = 70 to 90, using a Dirac-Fock computer programme. Their plots between AE and Z are very similar to our plots. It may indirectly be concluded from their work that the Bohr-Coster diagrams are valid for multiply ionized atomic states of heavier elements also. 5. Concluding remarks The results of our present calculations, although based on a few light elements only, reveal that the atomic states of multiply ionized atoms show the same trend of

260 Lakshmi Natarajan, A V Tankhiwale and Chintamani Mande behaviour as is exhibited by the normal X-ray states. Our work, however, shows that the values of the principal quantum number for the exotic atoms are no more 1, 2, 3... as for the normal K, L, M... X-ray states but the concept of an effective quantum number has to be introduced to account for their energies. It seems now necessary to undertake further theoretical and experimental investigations on the nature and behaviour of exotic atoms. Fortunately with the advent of numerous heavyion accelerators presently available in different parts of the world, it should now be possible to carry out meaningful experiments on satellite and hypersatellite lines in X- ray and Auger spectra. Such studies will hopefully lead to a better understanding of the processes occurring in ion-atom collisions and the nature of the various transient atomic states. It has been recently shown (Raman and Vane 1984) that the X-ray satellite spectra of chemical compounds produced by heavy ion bombardment display significant variations in satellite peaks, which are found to depend on the chemical environment of the emitting atoms. In order to understand the effects of chemical bonding in satellite spectra and to be able to derive any meaningful information from such studies, it seems necessary to first systematize and understand the data on multiply ionized atomic states of pure elements. References Bearden J A and Burr A F 1967 Rev. Mod. Phys. 39' 125 Bhalla C P, Folland N O and Hein M A 1973 Phys. Rel~. A8 649 Breuckmann B 1979 J. Phys. Bl2 20, 609 CrandaU D H 1983 Nucl. Instrum. Methods 214 129 Hahn Y 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Bl0-11 92 Kauffman R L, Hopkins F F, Woods C W and Richard P 1973 Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 621 Kuhn H G 1969 Atomic spectra (London: Longmans, Green & Co.) p. 238 Lakshmi Natarajan 1986 Study of the Kct satellite and hypersatellite lines in the X-ray and Auger spectra of some light elements Ph.D. thesis, Nagpur University, Nagpur, India Lakshmi Natarajan, Tankhiwale A V and Mande C 1986a Pramana-J. Phys. 26 55 Lakshmi Natarajan, Tankhiwale A V and Mande C 1986b Pramana-J. Phys. 27 275, 683 Matthews D L, Johnson B M, Mackey J J and Moore C F 1973 Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 1331 Moseley H G J 1913 Philos. Mag. 26 1024 Raman S and Vane C R 1984 Nucl. Instrum. Methods!i3 71 Richard P, Hodge W and Moore C F t972 Phys. Rev. Left. 29 393 Slater J C 1960 Quantum theory of atomic structure (New York: McGraw-Hill) Vol. 1 Uchai W, Nestor Jr C W, Raman S and Vane C R 1986 Atomic data and nuclear data tables 34 201 White H E 1934 Introduction to atomic spectra (New York: McGraw Hill) p. 89, 108