The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

Similar documents
The power of chemical tagging for studying Galactic evolution

Overview of Gaia-ESO Survey results based on high-resolution spectra of FGK-type stars Rodolfo Smiljanic! (Gaia-ESO WG11 co-coordinator)

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

Galactic Bulge Science

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

Chemical tagging of FGK stars: testing membership to stellar kinematic groups

Substructure in the Galaxy

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Galactic archaeology with the RAdial Velocity Experiment

Matthias Steinmetz. 16 Oct 2012 Science from the Next Generation Imaging and Spectroscopic Surveys 1

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Milky Way S&G Ch 2. Milky Way in near 1 IR H-W Rixhttp://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/galarcheo-c15/rix/

Stellar Surveys at the Australian Astronomical Observatory (AAO)

Astr 5465 Feb. 5, 2018 Kinematics of Nearby Stars

Galaxy classification

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

Chemical evolution of the Galactic disk using Open Clusters

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

Search for streams in thick disk and halo of the Milky Way

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

Gaia ITNG2013 School, Tenerife. Ken Freeman, Lecture 2: the thin disk

Stellar Populations in the Local Group

Myung Gyoon Lee. With Ho Seong Hwang (CfA) and Hong Soo Park (NAOJ) (Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University)

The Milky Way Part 3 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2011 part 8

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

II. Morphology and Structure of Dwarf Galaxies

The Star Clusters of the Magellanic Clouds

Spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way

The Milky Way Part 2 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 7

Galaxy Evolution at High Resolution: The New View of the Milky Way's Disc. Jo Bovy (University of Toronto; Canada Research Chair)

Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

The Milky Way Galaxy

Three Major Components

IV. Interacting Galaxies

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Galactic dynamics reveals Galactic history

WEAVE Galactic Surveys

Dust [12.1] Star clusters. Absorb and scatter light Effect strongest in blue, less in red, zero in radio.

An analogy. "Galaxies" can be compared to "cities" What would you like to know about cities? What would you need to be able to answer these questions?

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Lecture 30. The Galactic Center

Galac%c Unprecedented Precision (0.01 dex)

Galaxy simulations in the Gaia era. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

The VPOS: a vast polar structure of satellite galaxies, globular clusters and streams around the MW

The Great Debate: The Size of the Universe (1920)

Review of the Bulge Stellar Population And Comparison to the Nuclear Bulge

Galaxies. Need a (physically) meaningful way of describing the relevant properties of a galaxy.

SMASHing the LMC. Yumi Choi. Montana State University/University of Arizona. Collaborator

r-process enrichment traced by Pu and Ba near the sun and in the Draco

Reconstructing Fossil Sub-structures of the Galactic Disk: Clues from Abundance Patterns of Old Open Clusters and Moving Groups

Surface Brightness of Spiral Galaxies

Halo Tidal Star Streams with DECAM. Brian Yanny Fermilab. DECam Community Workshop NOAO Tucson Aug

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

Gaia News:Counting down to launch A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova Astronomical Observatory on behalf of DPACE

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

Lecture Five: The Milky Way: Structure

Major Review: A very dense article" Dawes Review 4: Spiral Structures in Disc Galaxies; C. Dobbs and J Baba arxiv "

Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way

The Milky Way Galaxy. Sun you are here. This is what our Galaxy would look like if we were looking at it from another galaxy.

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Ricardo Schiavon

The Milky Way Galaxy (ch. 23)

telescopes resolve it into many faint (i.e. distant) stars What does it tell us?

ASTRO 310: Galactic & Extragalactic Astronomy Prof. Jeff Kenney

Tristan Cantat-Gaudin

View of the Galaxy from within. Lecture 12: Galaxies. Comparison to an external disk galaxy. Where do we lie in our Galaxy?

Following the evolution of the Galactic disc with Open Clusters

Globular Clusters: a chemical roadmap between anomalies and homogeneity ALESSIO MUCCIARELLI

The Milky Way Galaxy. sun. Examples of three Milky-Way like Galaxies

Overview of Dynamical Modeling. Glenn van de Ven

Chemistry & Dynamics of the Milky Way From Before Hipparcos Until Gaia

Galaxies -- Introduction. Classification -- Feb 13, 2014

Ay162, Spring 2006 Week 8 p. 1 of 15

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

THE QUEST RR LYRAE SURVEY AND HALO SUB-STRUCTURE

Evolution of second generation stars in stellar disks of globular and nuclear clusters: ω Centauri as a test case

The Detailed Chemical Abundance Patterns of M31 Globular Clusters

PE#4: It contains some useful diagrams and formula which we ll use today

PATRICIA B. TISSERA. Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics Argentina

Exploring the structure and evolu4on of the Milky Way disk

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

Star systems like our Milky Way. Galaxies

Figure 69.01a. Formation of Stars

The GALAH Survey: Scientific Motivation

The Gaia-ESO Survey: Detailed Abundances in the Globular Cluster NGC 4372

Einführung in die Astronomie II

Renegades in the Solar neighborhood

Dwarf galaxy Abundances and Radialvelocities. Team (DART) Large Programme A Close Look at Nearby Galaxies

Chapter 19 Reading Quiz Clickers. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Our Galaxy Pearson Education, Inc.

Distribution of Mass in the Milky Way Galaxy, Leiden, July Laura V. Sales. Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands

Other stellar types. Open and globular clusters: chemical compositions

DOES THE MILKY WAY HAVE AN ACCRETED DISK COMPONENT?

Accretion Disks. Review: Stellar Remnats. Lecture 12: Black Holes & the Milky Way A2020 Prof. Tom Megeath 2/25/10. Review: Creating Stellar Remnants

ASTR 200 : Lecture 22 Structure of our Galaxy

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

The Galaxy. (The Milky Way Galaxy)

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Chapter 14 The Milky Way Galaxy

Transcription:

The HERMES project Reconstructing Galaxy Formation Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

HERMES is a new high-resolution fiber-fed multi-object spectrometer on the AAT spectral resolution 28,000 (also R = 45,000 mode) 400 fibres over π square degrees 4 bands (BGRI) ~ 1000 Å First light late 2012 Main driver: the GALAH survey (Galactic Archaeology with HERMES) Team of about 40, mostly from Australian institutions

The goals of galactic archaeology Aim to reconstruct the star-forming aggregates that built up the disk, bulge and halo of the Galaxy Some of these dispersed aggregates (clusters, accreted galaxies) can be still recognised kinematically as stellar moving groups. For others, the dynamical information was lost through disk heating and mixing processes, but they are still recognizable by their chemical signatures (chemical tagging).

A major goal is to identify how important mergers and accretion events were in building up the Galactic disk and the bulge. CDM predicts a high level of merger activity which conflicts with some observed properties of disk galaxies. Try to find the debris of groups of stars, now dispersed, that were associated at birth, either because they were born together in a single Galactic star-forming event, or because they came from a common accreted galaxy.

Galactic halo shows kinematical substructure - believed to be the remains of accreted objects that built up the halo The galactic disk also shows kinematical substructure : usually called moving stellar groups. The stars of the moving groups are all around us Some are associated with dynamical resonances (bar) or spiral structure (eg Hercules moving group) Some are debris of star-forming aggregates in the disk (eg the HR1614 and Wolf 630 moving groups), partly dispersed into extended regions of the Galaxy Others may be debris of infalling objects, as seen in ΛCDM simulations (Arcturus group?)

V Hercules U HR1614 De Silva et al 2007

Hercules group o Field stars The chemical abundances of Hercules Group stars cannot be distinguished from the field stars. This is a dynamical group, not the relic of a star forming event. Bensby et al 2007

HR 1614 o field stars The HR 1614 stars (age 2 Gyr) are chemically homogeneous. They are probably the dispersed relic of an old star forming event. De Silva et al 2007

Although the disk does show some surviving kinematic substructure in the form of moving stellar groups, a lot of dynamical information was lost in the the subsequent heating and radial mixing by spiral arms and giant molecular clouds. Most dispersed aggregates would not now be recognizable dynamically However... we are not restricted to dynamical techniques. Much fossil information is locked up in the detailed distribution of chemical elements in stars.

Chemical Tagging Use the detailed chemical abundances of stars to tag or associate them to common ancient star-forming aggregates with similar abundance patterns (eg Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn ARAA 2002) The detailed abundance pattern reflects the chemical evolution of the gas from which the aggregate formed. Chemical studies of the old disk stars in the Galaxy can help to identify disk stars that are the debris of common dispersed star-forming aggregates and also those which came in from outside in disrupting satellites

The detailed chemical properties of surviving satellites (the dwarf spheroidal galaxies) vary from satellite to satellite, and are different from the overall properties of the disk stars. Evolution of abundance ratios reflects different star formation histories Venn (2008) SNII +SNIa LMC Pompeia, Hill et al. 2008 Sgr Sbordone et al. 2007 Fornax Letarte PhD 2007 Sculptor Hill et al. 2008 + Geisler et al. 2005 Carina Koch et al. 2008 + Shetrone et al. 2003 Milky-Way Venn et al. 2004 rise in s-process

We can think of a chemical space of abundances of elements Na, Mg, Al, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zr, Ba, Eu for example (25 measurable elements with HERMES). The dimensionality of this space is 8 to 9. Most disk stars inhabit a sub-region of this space. Stars from chemically homogeneous aggregates will lie in tight clumps In C-space. Stars which came in from satellites may be different enough to stand out from the rest of the disk stars in chemical space. With this chemical tagging approach, we may be able to detect or put observational limits on the satellite accretion history of the galactic disk Wylie de Boer et al (2010) have already used the chemical peculiarities of ω Centauri to identify field stars that were probably stripped from it or its parent dwarf galaxy when it was accreted by the Milky Way.

For chemical tagging to work in reconstructing the star formation history of the disk. stars form in large aggregates - believed to be true aggregates are chemically homogenous aggregates have unique chemical signatures defined by several elements which do not vary in lockstep from one aggregate to another. Need sufficient spread in abundances from aggregate to aggregate so that chemical signatures can be distinguished with accuracy achievable (~ 0.05 dex differentially) The last two conditions appear to be true: see e.g. G. de Silva et al (2009), Pancino et al (2009) Internal metallicity distributions have measured dispersions σ ~ 0.02 to 0.07

Chemical tagging is not just assigning stars chemically to a particular population (thin disk, thick disk, halo) Chemical tagging is intended to assign stars chemically to a common origin in substructure which is no longer detectable kinematically. Chemical tagging needs a high resolution spectroscopic survey of about 10 6 stars, homogeneously observed and analysed.. this is a prime science driver for HERMES The Galactic thick disk could be particularly interesting...

[(α + Eu)/H] vs [Fe/H] for thin and thick disk stars near the sun The thick disk is chemically distinct Navarro et al (2010), Furhmann (2008), Bensby (2004)

Thick disks are very common in other galaxies: they provide about 10% of the disk mass in large spirals, and are old (> 8 Gyr) and moderately metal-poor. Their formation is not yet understood. Some possible formation routes: heating of the early stellar disk by accretion events or minor mergers stellar debris of ancient merger events star formation associated with early large gaseous accretion events radial migration of kinematically hot stars from inner Galaxy dissolution of giant clumps in high-z galaxies

The clump cluster galaxies Many high-z galaxies show massive starbursting clumps: masses up to 10 9 M and star formation rates of ~ 20 M yr -1. These clumps are short-lived (< 10 8 yr) and may disperse to form the thick disk (Bournaud et al 2009). If this is correct, the thick disk would have formed from a relatively small number of clumps. If these massive clumps were chemically homogenous (e.g. Bland-Hawthorn et al 2010), then it will be fairly easy to identify the debris of a small number of clumps from their distribution in chemical C-space. Genzel et al 2010

Galactic Archaeology with HERMES We are planning a large stellar survey down to V = 14 (matches the fiber density) Cover about half the southern sky ( b > 25) : 10,000 square degrees = 3000 pointings gives 1.2 x 10 6 stars At V = 14, R = 28,000, expect SNR = 100 per resolution element in 60 minutes Do ~ 8 fields per night for ~ 400 clear nights (bright time program)

Galaxia survey tool (Sharma & Bland-Hawthorn) : choose fields with low reddening and high enough stellar density to fill the fibers. Chemical pipeline by Wylie de Boer, Sneden & d Orazi gives spectroscopic stellar parameters and abundances for 25 elements

Relative densities of stars with V < 14, 10 < b < 60 1.5

Fractional contribution from Galactic components Dwarf Giant Thin disk 0.58 0.20 Thick disk 0.10 0.07 Halo 0.02 0.03

Old disk dwarfs are seen out to distances of about 1 kpc Disk clump giants. 5 Halo giants 15 About 9% of the thick disk stars and about 14% of the thin disk stars pass through our 1 kpc dwarf horizon Assume that all of their formation aggregates are now azimuthally mixed right around the Galaxy, so all of their formation sites are represented within our horizon

Simulations (JBH & KCF 2004, JBH et al 2010) show that a random sample of 1.2 x 10 6 stars with V < 14 would allow detection of about 20 thick disk dwarfs from each of about 4,500 star formation sites 10 thin disk dwarfs from each of about 35,000 star formation sites * A smaller survey means less stars from a similar number of sites

Can we detect ~ 35,000 different disk sites using chemical tagging techniques? Yes: we would need ~ 7 independent chemical element groups, each with 5 measurable abundance levels to get enough independent cells (5 7 ) in chemical space. (4 8 is also OK) Are there 7 independent elements or element groups? Yes: we can estimate the dimensionality of chemical space

The dimensionality of the HERMES chemical space The 25 HERMES elements: Li C O Na Al K Mg Si Ca Ti Sc V Cr Mn Fe Co N Cu Zn Y Zr Ba La Nd Eu Ting, KCF et al (2011) made principal component analysis (PCA) of element abundances [X/Fe] from several catalogs: metal-poor stars, metal-rich stars, open clusters, Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy.

PCA includes detailed simulation of effects of observational errors on the apparent dimensionality of the C-space, element by element. Outcome: the HERMES C-space has dimensionality = 8 to 9 for all of these samples: metal-poor stars (Barklem, Cayrel: 281 stars: [Fe/H] < -2) metal-rich stars (Reddy: 357 stars: [Fe/H] > -1) open clusters (Carrera & Pancino: 78 clusters) Fornax dwarf galaxy (Letarte et al: 80 stars) The open clusters, which cover R G = 6 to 20 kpc, have about one more dimension than the metal-rich solar neighborhood stars. The principal components are vectors in C-space of element abundances [X/Fe]: identifiable with nucleosynthetic processes e.g. light and heavy s-process elements

HERMES and GAIA GAIA is a major element of a HERMES survey GAIA (~ 2015) will provide precision astrometry for about 10 9 stars For V = 14, σ π = 10 µas, σ µ = 10 µas yr -1 : this is GAIA at its best (1% distance errors at 1 kpc, 0.7 km s -1 velocity errors at 15 kpc) accurate transverse velocities for all stars in the HERMES sample, and accurate distances for all of the survey stars therefore accurate color-(absolute magnitude) diagram for all of the survey stars: independent check that chemically tagged groups have common age.

Chemical tagging in the inner Galactic disk (expect ~ 200,000 survey giants in inner region of Galaxy) The old (> 1 Gyr) surviving open clusters are all in the outer Galaxy, beyond a radius of 8 kpc. Expect many broken open and globular clusters in the inner disk : good for chemical tagging recovery using giants, and good for testing radial mixing theory. The Na/O anticorrelation is unique to globular clusters, and will help to identify the debris of disrupted globular clusters.

De Silva et al 2009

De Silva et al 2009

The Hercules group is associated with local resonant kinematic disturbances by the inner bar : OLR is near solar radius (Hipparcos data) : Dehnen (1999) Sirius and Hyades streams - mainly younger metal-rich stars V Hercules disturbance from OLR - mainly later-type stars U (U,V are relative to the LSR) Dehnen 1999