Tritium Fuel Cycle Safety

Similar documents
Tritium Inventories and Tritium Safety Design Principles for the Fuel cycle of ITER

Tritium Inventories and Containment Philosophy for the Fuel cycle of ITER

Elements of Strategy on Modelling Activities in the area of Test Blanket Systems

10.1 Functions, Basic Configuration and System Boundaries

TRITIUM RECOVERY FROM WASTE USING A PALLADIUM MEMBRANE REACTOR

Safety considerations for Fusion Energy: From experimental facilities to Fusion Nuclear Science and beyond

Key words: EcosimPro, model, simulation, detritiation.

Summary Tritium Day Workshop

Tritium Plant in ITER and F4E Contribution. G. Piazza ITER Department, Fusion for Energy

UPDATE OF ITER ISS-WDS PROCESS DESIGN 2 TW6-TTFD-TPI-55 (EFDA/ )

The Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth. S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

3.1 Tritium Plant and Detritiation

12 Moderator And Moderator System

MAGNETIC FUSION m DO NOT CIRCULATE RESEARCH

Preliminary Safety Analysis of CH HCSB TBM

Plasma Wall Interactions in Tokamak

A Faster Way to Fusion

Fusion Fuel Cycle. ing. Stefan Ionut SPIRIDON. Association Days, Institutefor Cryogenics and Isotopes Technologies Rm.

Tritium Technologies of ITER and DEMO breeding blankets

Tritium Safety of Russian Test Blanket Module

SOME CONSIDERATION IN THE TRITIUM CONTROL DESIGN OF THE SOLID BREEDER BLANKET CONCEPTS

Advanced Tritium Recovery System

Studsvik Nuclear AB, Sweden

Provisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO

Tritium processing system for the ITER Li/V Blanket Test Module

Mission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF

AP1000 European 11. Radioactive Waste Management Design Control Document

Cryogenic Target Handling System Operations Manual Volume IV CTHS Description Chapter 5: Tritium Fill Station (TFS)

11. Radioactive Waste Management AP1000 Design Control Document

TECHNICAL NOTE related to the Market survey on Water Holding Tanks for the Water Detritiation System (WDS) Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by ---

Cryogenic Viscous Compressor Development and Modeling for the ITER Vacuum System

Successful Development of a New Catalyst for Efficiently Collecting Tritium in Nuclear Fusion Reactors

Possibilities for Long Pulse Ignited Tokamak Experiments Using Resistive Magnets

Overview of Control System Design

Studies on bi-directional hydrogen isotopes permeation through the first wall of a magnetic fusion power reactor

Safety Issues Related to Liquid Metals

Recent R&D Activities on Tritium Technologies in Tritium Process Laboratory (TPL) of Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)

Tokamak Divertor System Concept and the Design for ITER. Chris Stoafer April 14, 2011

Physics & Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan. Supported by NSERC, CRC

EU PPCS Models C & D Conceptual Design

Role and Challenges of Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology (FNST) toward DEMO

ITER A/M/PMI Data Requirements and Management Strategy

Compact, spheromak-based pilot plants for the demonstration of net-gain fusion power

Title: Assessment of activity inventories in Swedish LWRs at time of decommissioning

Radiation safety of the Danish Center for Proton Therapy (DCPT) Lars Hjorth Præstegaard Dept. of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital

MELCOR Analysis of Helium/Water/Air Ingress into ITER Cryostat and Vacuum Vessel

Activation Calculation for a Fusion-driven Sub-critical Experimental Breeder, FDEB

Toward the Realization of Fusion Energy

Lessons learnt on Tritium and workers in Fusion devices

Neutronics Experiments for ITER at JAERI/FNS

Unpressurized steam reactor. Controlled Fission Reactors. The Moderator. Global energy production 2000

Atomic physics in fusion development

Compact Photon Source Conceptual Design for K 0 L Production at Hall D

Issues for Neutron Calculations for ITER Fusion Reactor

Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors

Recovery of Tritium from Tritiated Waste Water Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Adaptation of Pb-Bi Cooled, Metal Fuel Subcritical Reactor for Use with a Tokamak Fusion Neutron Source

for the French fusion programme

Process Design Decisions and Project Economics Prof. Dr. V. S. Moholkar Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

ITER DIAGNOSTIC PORT PLUG DESIGN. N H Balshaw, Y Krivchenkov, G Phillips, S Davis, R Pampin-Garcia

Fusion Development Facility (FDF) Mission and Concept

A SUPERCONDUCTING TOKAMAK FUSION TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE REACTOR

PHYSICS A2 UNIT 2 SECTION 1: RADIOACTIVITY & NUCLEAR ENERGY

HDice overview A.M. Sandorfi

Neutral beam plasma heating

The Dynomak Reactor System

Diagnostics for Burning Plasma Physics Studies: A Status Report.

Manufacturing Process of Self-Luminous Glass Tube (SLGT) Utilizing Tritium Gas: Design of Tritium Handling Facilities

Performance of the Tritium Removal Systems at LLE

DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies. Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor

Systems, Matter, & Energy Chapter 2. Friday, August 14 th, 2015

Physics of fusion power. Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER

INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION

The Li-wall Stellarator Experiment in TJ-II

The Spherical Tokamak as a Compact Fusion Reactor Concept

Utilization of Egyptian Research Reactor and modes of collaboration

[2]

Overview of Pilot Plant Studies

Tritium Control and Safety

In-vessel Tritium Inventory in ITER Evaluated by Deuterium Retention of Carbon Dust

Jason T. Harris, Ph.D. Department of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics

An Overview of SRNL Tritium Activities

A Virtual Reactor Model for Inertial Fusion Energy. Michel Decroisette Noël Fleurot Marc Novaro Guy Schurtz Jacques Duysens

FOURTH IAEA DEMO PROGRAMME WORKSHOP

Tritium Transport Modelling: first achievements on ITER Test Blanket Systems simulation and perspectives for DEMO Breeding Blanket

Characterization of waste by R2S methodology: SEACAB system. Candan Töre 25/11/2017, RADKOR2017, ANKARA

Grade 11: A Deeper Understanding of Energy

Disruption mitigation in ITER

Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Tokamaks Chijin Xiao Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan

GERDA TG4 - Cryogenic Vessel. Status Report

Nuclear Fusion 1 of 24 Boardworks Ltd 2011

Homework 06. Nuclear

Accelerator-Based Neutron Generator to Drive Sub-Critical Isotope Production Systems. Ross Radel, PhD President, Phoenix Nuclear Labs

Tritium: Fuel of Fusion Reactors

Overview of Control System Design

Atomic and Nuclear Physics Review (& other related physics questions)

Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Divertor Plans and Research Options

Jacob s Ladder Controlling Lightning

January 19, 2012, Workshop on Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule Case Studies for Byproduct/Recycling Reporting

SOUTHERN NUCLEAR COMPANY VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC DOCKET NOS AND

Transcription:

Tritium Fuel Cycle Safety W Kirk Hollis 1, Craig MV Taylor 1, Scott Willms 2 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2 ITER IAEA Workshop on Fusion Energy June 14 th, 2018 Slide 1

Overview What is a Tritium Plant? Examples of Designs (Fusion Reactors) Details of some major components Tritium Safety Tritium gas confinement HAZOP Process Slide 2

Overview of tritium processing for fusion energy science at LANL Historical Tritium Station Test Assembly (1976-late 1990 s) To serve as a flexible, full-scale pilot plant for the fusion fuel cycle testing: - Components - Integrated operation - Environmental and personnel protective systems With interest in: - Performance, Reliability, Response to off-normal conditions. And with particular interest in demonstrating that tritium can be handled safely Directly funded by DOE OS FES Slide 3

TSTA consisted of over 10 interconnected systems dedicated to various purposes Slide 4

Simplified LIFE Fuel Cycle Diagram Slide 5

ITER Fuel Cycle Overview DT loop fuel tokamak with T2 and D2 D2 loop supplies neutral beams with D2 (and some H2) Effluent detritiation oxidizes all hydrogen isotopes to water, recovers tritium from the water and exhausts the detritiated gases. Slide 6

Tritium Fuel Cycle Primary Component Vacuum Pumping Exhaust Processing Isotope Separation Storage and Delivery Fueling ITER Support Components Detritiation Systems Room Air Water detritiation Analytical System Controls Diagnostics Building Tokamak Building Tritium Plant Building Slide 7

Exhaust Processing Function Separate hydrogen isotopes (Q 2 ) from other gas impurities Convert other tritiated gas impurities (e.g. Q 2 O and CQ 4 ) to Q 2 Retain gamma emitters (e.g. 41 Ar) to provide time for radioactive decay CH 4 H 2 O CO Catalyst PMR CO 2, CH 4, H 2 O H 2 Detritiated Retentate Permeate (Product) Palladium Membrane Slide 8

Isotope Separation Function Process exhaust Q 2 into T 2, D 2 and H 2 and return T 2 and D 2 Storage and Fueling Recover T 2 from WDS and return H 2 to WDS Recover T 2 from neutral beam D 2 and HD, and return D 2 to neutral beams ITER Conceptual Design Reichert H., Nobile A. LANL 2014 Slide 9

Storage and Delivery Function Recycle DT for torus fueling Recycle D2 for neutral beams Medium-term storage of D and T Long-term storage of T Load-in/Load-out of T Q 2 assay / inventory Collect 3 He ITER Conceptual Design STACI CT Pre/Post Hydride LANL 2017 Slide 10

Integration of Safety Slide 11

Safety Parameters Confinement of tritium Physical state (g,l,s) Controls for gas have been developed and are accepted (SS, double wall, etc.) Inventory Facility will have a material at risk level (MAR) and defined authorization levels within the facility. Activation products Controls have been developed and are accepted (shielding, decay tanks, ALARA, etc.) but products need to be defined. Slide 12

Tritium Safety Tritium Gas confinement Tritium Gas (layers) Double Wall on process lines GB Building / Room air pressure cascade Detritiation system (DS) Diffusion is negligible in most assessments due to temperature Isolatable volumes Tritiated water Slide 13

Definition HAZOP Process- An analysis technique through which deviations from baseline operations or processes are systematically analyzed to identify potential consequences (hazards) used to define system design criteria and to develop detection and controls to ensure safe system operations. The HAZOP system relies on an interdisciplinary team of experts that examines every part of a process to determine how deviation from design intentions can occur, if these deviation result in a consequence of interest and associated hazard, develop detection and control to minimize the impact and then assess the residual risk of the deviation. The HAZOP process can be viewed as a reverse engineering process to identify design criteria needed to perform an operation safely. Slide 14

Systematic Analysis HAZOP relies on Guide Words and Process Variables to assess potential deviations Guide Word: No, More, Less, As Well As, Part of, Reverse, and Other Than Process Variables: Flow, Pressure, Temperature, Containment*, Shielding*, Magnetism*, Radiation*, etc. * Develop specifically for ITER Slide 15

HAZOP Deviation used at ITER PROCESS VARIABLES Flow Pressure GUIDE WORDS No, Not, None Less, Low, Short More, High, Long Part of No flow Open to surrounding environment Low rate Low integrated flow Low pressure High rate High integrated flow High pressure Missing feed, Condensation or adsorption As Well As Also Additional feed, Evaporation or desorption Other Than Wrong material Reverse Backflow Temperature Low temperature High temperature Phase change Auto-refrigeration Confinement Rapid failure Slow leaks No overpressure relief In-leakage Reaction No reaction Slow reaction Runaway reaction Partial reaction Side reaction Wrong reaction Decomposition Procedure Skipped step Partially-completed step Speed Stopped Too slow Too fast Out of sync Concentration Material not present Low concentration High concentration Extra action(s) (shortcuts) Additional material present Wrong action Disconnect (drive shaft or belt break) Wrong material present Out of order, Opposite Backward Magnetism No field Low field High field Opposite field Radiation No radiation Low levels of radiation High levels of radiation Additional rad type Different rad type Power Long power failure Short power failure Power surge Insufficient power Co-location / Adjacent ops Loss of co-located system Reduction in colocated system Excess from colocated system Access/Egress Cannot access Limited access Entrapment Other systems competing for colocated system Impact on colocated system Slide 16

Controls Hierarchy of Controls Elimination Substitution Engineering Administrative Personal Protective Equipment Slide 17

Detection and Controls affect on Residual Risk Slide 18

Risk Matrix Slide 19

ITER Hazard Analysis Phases Phase 1: High-Level system analysis Overall process (e.g. TEP) is treated as a black box Inputs and Outputs are define HAZOP method is applied Implementation of results into initial design Phase 2: Initial system design System segmented into defined units HAZOP method is applied Implementation of results into design Slide 20

ITER Hazard Analysis Process Phase 3: Failure Analysis Modified system undergoes a failure analysis review (e.g. FMEA) Implementation of results Final design developed Phase 4: Procedural Analysis Operational documentation developed HAZOP analysis applied Implementation of results Slide 21

Summary Overview of what a tritium plant would look like Application of Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) into design Questions Slide 22

Support Slides Slide 23

Conceptual Design for TEP System, ITER Integration of HPL experimental data with TEP modeling / sizing Ar/O2 CO Ar, N2, CO, CO2, He/Ne (O2, Q2, Q2O) System Evac* Q2 / Air-likes Test Blanket Ar(T2) LTEP Air-Like/Water-like Processing (ALP/WLP) HV I Storage Tank #1 H2O PMR 1 0.35 m 2 8 torr Spare PMR 0.35 m 2 Spare PMR 2 0.35 m 2 2 torr PMR 3 0.3 m 2 10-3 torr CR 2 AMSB 2 3 liters To ALP/WLP Ar Decay Vessels H2 (Q2) D2 DT DS ISS1 ISS2 ISS3 HTEP Storage Tank #2 From AMSB 1 and 2 Type 2 Diag Ar/DTO NB CP Ar/DTO Torus CP SRD 2.5 Ar/DTO CO AMSB 3 3 liters *System Evac: ISS (e.g., expansion tanks) SDS Long Term Storage Hot Cells Service Vacuum Fueling ANS WDS Roughing Pump System NBI TEP (including CMSB) DS DTO Hot Cell DTO CO AMSB 4 (External) Figure 4: ITER TEP system conceptual process flow diagram for processing. Slide 24

Tritium Processing Design / Safety LANL Capabilities HPL PMR / Permeator (Diffusers) U-bed tritium storage CH 4 H 2 O CO Catalyst Developing small scale isotope separation Conceptual Design TEP (collaboration with SRS) ITER tritium plant processing and facility safety design LM processes; LIFE, MAGLIFE, Industrial partners PMR CO 2, CH 4, H 2 O PMR Design H 2 Detritiated Retentate Permeate (Product) Palladium Membrane STACI Hydride Test STACI CT Pre/Post Hydride Slide 25

Vacuum / Roughing Torus Vacuum Cyropanel Mechanical Pumping Slide 26