A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Similar documents
A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

Power spectrum exercise

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

20 Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation continued

The cosmic background radiation II: The WMAP results. Alexander Schmah

Lecture 03. The Cosmic Microwave Background

Cosmic Microwave Background

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

The Once and Future CMB

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

Ringing in the New Cosmology

Cosmic Microwave Background Introduction

The Cosmic Microwave Background

n=0 l (cos θ) (3) C l a lm 2 (4)

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

Astronomy 422. Lecture 20: Cosmic Microwave Background

El Universo en Expansion. Juan García-Bellido Inst. Física Teórica UAM Benasque, 12 Julio 2004

Physics 463, Spring 07. Formation and Evolution of Structure: Growth of Inhomogenieties & the Linear Power Spectrum

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Thermal History of the Universe and the Cosmic Microwave Background. II. Structures in the Microwave Background

The AfterMap Wayne Hu EFI, February 2003

Lecture 09. The Cosmic Microwave Background. Part II Features of the Angular Power Spectrum

Licia Verde. Introduction to cosmology. Lecture 4. Inflation

The cosmic microwave background radiation

Priming the BICEP. Wayne Hu Chicago, March BB

Cosmic Microwave Background. References: COBE web site WMAP web site Web sites of Wayne Hu, Max Tegmark, Martin White, Ned Wright and Yuki Takahashi

Astronomy 182: Origin and Evolution of the Universe

What can we Learn from the Cosmic Microwave Background

BAO & RSD. Nikhil Padmanabhan Essential Cosmology for the Next Generation VII December 2017

CMB Anisotropies: The Acoustic Peaks. Boom98 CBI Maxima-1 DASI. l (multipole) Astro 280, Spring 2002 Wayne Hu

Brief Introduction to Cosmology

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

Cosmology II: The thermal history of the Universe

3 Observational Cosmology Evolution from the Big Bang Lecture 2

The Cosmic Microwave Background

Cosmology with CMB: the perturbed universe

Lecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014

Astr 102: Introduction to Astronomy. Lecture 16: Cosmic Microwave Background and other evidence for the Big Bang

CMB Anisotropies Episode II :

Anisotropy in the CMB

Cosmology. Clusters of galaxies. Redshift. Late 1920 s: Hubble plots distances versus velocities of galaxies. λ λ. redshift =

Outline. Walls, Filaments, Voids. Cosmic epochs. Jeans length I. Jeans length II. Cosmology AS7009, 2008 Lecture 10. λ =

The oldest science? One of the most rapidly evolving fields of modern research. Driven by observations and instruments

Clusters: Context and Background

Structure in the CMB

Clusters: Context and Background


The ultimate measurement of the CMB temperature anisotropy field UNVEILING THE CMB SKY

Cosmology in a nutshell + an argument against

OVERVIEW OF NEW CMB RESULTS

The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 25 Jun 1998

An Acoustic Primer. Wayne Hu Astro 448. l (multipole) BOOMERanG MAXIMA Previous COBE. W. Hu Dec. 2000

Island Universes. Up to 1920 s, many thought that Milky Way encompassed entire universe.

Physical Cosmology 6/6/2016

BAO AS COSMOLOGICAL PROBE- I

Lecture 3+1: Cosmic Microwave Background

Cosmology with CMB & LSS:

Observational evidence for Dark energy

Theory of galaxy formation

The Expanding Universe

Dark Energy in Light of the CMB. (or why H 0 is the Dark Energy) Wayne Hu. February 2006, NRAO, VA

Observational Cosmology

Highlights from Planck 2013 cosmological results Paolo Natoli Università di Ferrara and ASI/ASDC DSU2013, Sissa, 17 October 2013

Implications of the Hubble Law: - it is not static, unchanging - Universe had a beginning!! - could not have been expanding forever HUBBLE LAW:

Cosmology and the Evolution of the Universe. Implications of the Hubble Law: - Universe is changing (getting bigger!) - it is not static, unchanging

The Power. of the Galaxy Power Spectrum. Eric Linder 13 February 2012 WFIRST Meeting, Pasadena

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND Lecture I

If there is an edge to the universe, we should be able to see our way out of the woods. Olber s Paradox. This is called Olber s Paradox

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

AST4320: LECTURE 10 M. DIJKSTRA

The Search for the Complete History of the Cosmos. Neil Turok

MODERN COSMOLOGY LECTURE FYTN08

Model Universe Including Pressure

The Theory of Inflationary Perturbations

The Outtakes. Back to Talk. Foregrounds Doppler Peaks? SNIa Complementarity Polarization Primer Gamma Approximation ISW Effect

Physics Nobel Prize 2006

CMB Polarization and Cosmology

FURTHER COSMOLOGY Book page T H E M A K E U P O F T H E U N I V E R S E

Physical Cosmology 18/5/2017

Large Scale Structure After these lectures, you should be able to: Describe the matter power spectrum Explain how and why the peak position depends on

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

Astronomy 182: Origin and Evolution of the Universe

MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI. Quantum generation of density perturbations in the early Universe. (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

Physical Cosmology 12/5/2017

Imprint of Scalar Dark Energy on CMB polarization

Weak gravitational lensing of CMB

Cosmology. Thornton and Rex, Ch. 16

Archaeology of Our Universe YIFU CAI ( 蔡一夫 )

Hubble's Law. H o = 71 km/s / Mpc. The further a galaxy is away, the faster it s moving away from us. V = H 0 D. Modern Data.

Rayleigh scattering:

Astronomy 162, Week 10 Cosmology Patrick S. Osmer Spring, 2006

Modern Cosmology April 4, Lecture 3 1

CMB studies with Planck

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

Chapter 21 Evidence of the Big Bang. Expansion of the Universe. Big Bang Theory. Age of the Universe. Hubble s Law. Hubble s Law

Theoretical Astrophysics and Cosmology

THE PRIMORDIAL FIREBALL. Joe Silk (IAP, CEA, JHU)

Transcription:

Reading: Chapter 8, sections 8.4 and 8.5 11. CMB Anisotropy Gravitational instability and structure formation Today s universe shows structure on scales from individual galaxies to galaxy groups and clusters up to superclusters of galaxies that can extend to 100 Mpc or more. If the universe is smooth but not perfectly smooth, then gravity will cause structure to grow, by drawing matter into regions that start slightly above the average density (and out of regions that start slightly below the average density). For this process to work, there must have been small-amplitude inhomogeneities present in the early universe, the seeds for the gravitational growth of structure. These inhomogeneities should cause slight non-uniformities in the CMB. In the simplest models with only baryonic matter, the predicted flucuations in the CMB are roughly one part in 10 3. With non-baryonic dark matter, it is possible to lower the level of CMB anisotropies to 10 5 and remain consistent with gravitational growth of today s structure. Measurement of CMB anisotropy The dipole anisotropy of the CMB, which is just the reflex of the earth s peculiar velocity (which is largely due to the motion of the Milky Way), was detected in the 1970s. The first detection of the intrinsic anisotropies of the CMB, reflecting structure in the universe at z rec rather than the motion of the earth today, was obtained by the COBE satellite in 1992. The variations are only a part in 10 5, so measuring them requires extremely high sensitivity and extremely good control of systematic errors, like contamination of the signal from other sources. Since COBE, there have been a number of measurements of CMB anisotropy with higher resolution and sensitivity, from the ground, balloons, and satellites. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) produced much higher resolution and more sensitive maps of CMB anisotropy, from 2003-2012. Today s state-of-the-art CMB map is from the European Planck satellite, which is more sensitive and higher resolution than WMAP. Ground-based experiments like the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) can get to smaller angular scales because they use larger telescopes. Characterizing the CMB anisotropy Suppose that we smooth a CMB map over an angular scale θ. (Any real map will automatically be smoothed at some minimum angular scale determined by the diffraction limit of the telescope used to make it, and we can subsequently smooth the map over larger scales.) We can then plot a histogram of the fractional temperature variations T/T in the smoothed map and measure the root-mean-square width of this histogram. To characterize the structure in the map, we can plot ( T/T) rms against the smoothing scale θ. 1

If the map consisted of randomly placed hot and cold spots, we would expect ( T/T) rms to decline in proportion to the square-root of the sky area ( 1/θ) because of N averaging of random variables. In fact, hot and cold regions are correlated over large scales, and ( T/T) rms declines much more slowly than 1/θ. The most widely used statistical measure of structure in CMB maps is the angular power spectrum, C l, derived from a decomposition of the map into spherical harmonics. Roughly speaking, l(l + 1)C l is the square of ( T/T) rms on the scale θ = 200/l degrees. Physics of CMB anisotropy It is not surprising that if the density of the universe is slightly inhomogeneous at z rec, then the CMB will be slightly non-uniform. There are several effects that link the inhomogeneities of the matter distribution to the CMB anisotropies: Adiabatic temperature fluctuations. Where the density is higher, the photon temperature is hotter. Doppler shifts. The gravitational perturbations caused by the density fluctuations induce peculiar velocities, and photons are blueshifted or redshifted if they last scattered off electrons with peculiar velocities toward us or away from us, respectively. Gravitational redshifts, as the photons climb out of the dark matter potential wells, or blueshifts as they fall off of potential hills. This effect makes the photons coming out of denser regions redder (cooler temperature). Different processes dominate on different scales, so if we can measure CMB anisotropy over a wide range of scales we can separate them to some degree. Acoustic oscillations As long as the universe is ionized, so that photons are tightly coupled to the electrons and baryons, the photons and baryons behave like a single, high-pressure fluid with a sound speed of approximately c/ 3. An overdense region may start to collapse under its own gravity, but eventually the buildup of pressure will halt and reverse the expansion. If there is enough time, a perturbation can contract and re-expand several times, a cycle of acoustic oscillations. Because of this effect, there is a preferred scale on which the temperature fluctuations are largest. This is the scale for which an overdense region has had just enough time to collapse to maximum compression when the universe recombines. On very large scales there has been insufficient time for contracton to occur, and gravitational redshifts produce approximately scale-invariant fluctuations. The physical size of the acoustic scale can be computed from first principles, once the densities of dark matter, baryons, and radiation are specified. The acoustic scale is a standard ruler. The angular size of the acoustic scale depends on the comoving distance to the last scattering surface and on 2

Planck satellite measurements of the angular power spectrum of temperature fluctuations in the CMB. Planck satellite measurements of the angular power spectrum of polarization fluctuations in the CMB. 3

geometry (curvature). Measuring cosmological parameters with the CMB If we specify the statistical properties of the density fluctuations present at z rec, and the matter and energy contents of the universe (Ω r,0, Ω m,0, Ω Λ,0, H 0, etc.), then we can predict the full pattern of CMB anisotropy. Model predictions can be tested against measurements, and the measurements can be used to infer the properties of the primordial fluctuations and the matter and energy contents of the universe. Changing parameters changes the predictions. There is some degeneracy among the parameters (i.e., changes in one can be traded off against changes in another), but with good measurements over a wide range of scales these degeneracies can mostly be broken. There is a nice illustration of these effects at http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/movies.html Plots on the next page convey the basic idea. 4

Theoretical predictions of the temperature power spectrum for a fiducial cosmological model (black solid line, parameters as indicated) and models in which one parameter is varied at a time. Top and bottom panels show logarithmic and linear l axes, respectively. Dotted red: High baryon density. Dashed green: Change of initial conditions, from different inflation model. Long-dashed blue: Lower Hubble constant. Dot-dashed green: No cosmological constant, Ω m = 0.3, open universe (k = 1) Dot-dashed red: No cosmological constant, Ω m = 1, flat universe (k = 0) The heights of the peaks depends most strongly on the matter density and the baryon density. The angular location of the peaks depends most strongly on curvature. The overall tilt depends on inflationary initial conditions. 5

CMB Polarization CMB anisotropies are polarized, i.e., they have slightly different amplitudes when measured in orthogonal polarizations. The polarized signal is only about 10% of the full signal (which is only 10 5 in the first place), and the polarization from foreground contaminants is hard to remove, so these measurements are tough. First detections in 2005, consistent with predictions from inflation. Roughly speaking, polarization doubles (or even triples) the information content of CMB anisotropies and better pins down what is causing anisotropy on a given scale. These effects can produce only particular kinds of statistical patterns, known as E-mode polarization. B-mode polarization can be produced by gravitational lensing of the E-mode pattern by clustered matter at low redshifts. B-mode polarization can also be produced by gravity waves created in the early universe, a.k.a. tensor fluctuations. Detection of B-mode polarization, especially from gravity waves, is the current holy grail of experimental CMB research. The challenge is partly one of raw sensitivity, but also controlling instrumental effects and astrophysical foregrounds (e.g., emission from dust in the Milky Way) at part-in-a-million levels. 6