Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 17th October 2011

Similar documents
Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations. DESC 31 st March 2009

EVALUATION OF ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE 2012/13 GAS YEAR SCALING FACTOR AND WEATHER CORRECTION FACTOR

Demand Estimation Sub-Committee. Seasonal Normal Review - Updated. 17 th December 2014

CWV Optimisation. TWG 12 th February 2014

DESC Technical Workgroup. CWV Optimisation Production Phase Results. 17 th November 2014

Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations CWV Review

CWV Review London Weather Station Move

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

OPT - O ptional, Mandatory, DOM - D o main i.e. Text, N umeric, D ate, MTimestamp, DEC - Number of decimal places

Demand Estimation Sub-Committee MOD330 Phase 1 and 2. 7 th November 2012

LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

Appendix O. Sediment Transport Modelling Technical Memorandum

Forecast Postalised Tariff 2015/ /20. Utility Regulator Explanatory Note. August Introduction

Administration by the CER of the Carbon Revenue Levy

FORECAST ACCURACY REPORT 2017 FOR THE 2016 NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT

Public Library Use and Economic Hard Times: Analysis of Recent Data

UNC Demand Estimation Sub-committee Minutes Wednesday 07 November 2012

Multivariate Regression Model Results

Forecasting. Chapter Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017

Product and Inventory Management (35E00300) Forecasting Models Trend analysis

A comparative and quantitative assessment of South Africa's wind resource the WASA project

Krasny license: Operational update February 2016

Statement of indicative wholesale water charges and charges scheme

SECTION T: SETTLEMENT AND TRADING CHARGES (Version 9 including Approved Modifications yet to be implemented)

Budget Estimates

Budget Estimates

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE LOAD FORECASTING

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H

Ryan K. Decker * NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama. Lee Burns Raytheon, Huntsville, Alabama

3. If a forecast is too high when compared to an actual outcome, will that forecast error be positive or negative?

Chapter 3. Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation

METOCEAN CRITERIA FOR VIRGINIA OFFSHORE WIND TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT PROJECT (VOWTAP)

The World Bank IN Maharashtra Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Program (P126325)

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT COST ALLOCATION TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND

Interstate Power & Light (IPL) 2013/2014

Gorge Area Demand Forecast. Prepared for: Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, Vermont Prepared by:

2006 IRP Technical Workshop Load Forecasting Tuesday, January 24, :00 am 3:30 pm (Pacific) Meeting Summary

Payment of Funds

Budget Estimates period of the No

Project Appraisal Guidelines

The World Bank Decentralized Community Driven Services Project (P117764)

Accounts at a Glance (As at the end of JULY 2013)

Water Level Analysis of Lower St. Marys River September 15, 2010

Page No. (and line no. if applicable):

SECTION T: SETTLEMENT AND TRADING CHARGES (Version 9 including Approved Modifications yet to be implemented)

Perspectives on the Confirmation of 2,3,7,8-TCDF for Isotope-Dilution HRGC/HRMS Methodologies

Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011

SOUTH AUSTRALIAN WIND STUDY REPORT SOUTH AUSTRALIAN ADVISORY FUNCTIONS

Determine the trend for time series data

A MACRO-DRIVEN FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING FORECAST MODEL PERFORMANCE

Wind Rules and Forecasting Project Update Market Issues Working Group 12/14/2007

Space ICAO. Bart Nicolai

Project No India Basin Shadow Study San Francisco, California, USA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Near-Field Sturgeon Monitoring for the New NY Bridge at Tappan Zee. Quarterly Report October 1 December 31, 2014

Budget Estimate

POWER SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE LOAD FORECASTING

Key Energy Variable (KEV) Console Monitoring. Martine McDonald Process Engineer ExxonMobil Texas Technology Showcase December 7, 2006

ENERGY BALANCING INVOICE AI_O_UKL_BALANCING_INVOICE. Contains 24 different record types: -

Population, Housing and Employment Forecasts. Technical Report

CMP239 Workgroup meeting 2

Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

PROJECT TITLE: 4.50 MW AKKIHEBBAL MINI HYDEL SCHEME, CAUVERY HYDRO ENERGY LTD., INDIA

Essential Maths Skills. for AS/A-level. Geography. Helen Harris. Series Editor Heather Davis Educational Consultant with Cornwall Learning

Developing Operational MME Forecasts for Subseasonal Timescales

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

The World Bank Haiti Business Development and Investment Project (P123974)

Promoting Rainwater Harvesting in Caribbean Small Island Developing States Water Availability Mapping for Grenada Preliminary findings

Draft. Butte County Long-Term Regional Growth Forecasts

2013 FORECAST ACCURACY BENCHMARKING SURVEY AND ENERGY

Using the Budget Features in Quicken 2008

INDEPENDENT MARKET TESTING AND OPERATIONAL EVALUATION OF GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICE PROVISION. Chris Frake, APSE solutions associate

peak half-hourly New South Wales

August 2018 ALGEBRA 1

Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

AERMOD Sensitivity to AERSURFACE Moisture Conditions and Temporal Resolution. Paper No Prepared By:

Modelling of Homeless Populations

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2)

Monthly Report: June 2017

Forecasting. Copyright 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.

Is Your GIS Ready For Grid Modernization? A State-of-the Industry Report

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ (July/August 2014) in perspective of multi-year ozone analysis

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * *

CHAPTER 5 - QUEENSLAND FORECASTS

Seasonality in recorded crime: preliminary findings

Public Disclosure Copy

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

United Kingdom. Total MAP Caseload. Average time needed to close MAP cases (in months)

March 5, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

NATIONAL ELECTRICITY FORECASTING REPORT UPDATE FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Screening and Spectral Summing of LANL Empty Waste Drums 13226

Transcription:

Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 17th October 2011

Outline Presentation of the AUGS Presentation of interim Unidentified Gas figures Q&A AOB

Overview of Project Plan

High Level Plan Key Dates Description Data Analysis 2nd March Kick-off meeting with Xoserve 9th March Industry workshop 4th May First draft AUGS published 16th May UNCC Meeting GL Noble Denton present AUGS Analysis and development 4th May - 15th June First consultation period of 4th July UNCC Meeting GL Noble Denton to present AUGS Provision methodology 31st July (30th September 2011) Second draft AUGS published of data 3rd October - 31st October Second consultation period 17th October 2011 UNCC Meeting GL Noble Denton to present AUGS 2 17th November 2011 Methodology submitted to UNCC for final approval Apply methodology 25th November Final version of AUGS published 25th November AUGS table published October 2011 - February 2012 Query process

AUGS Second Draft Updated methodology, based on Additional experience and insight Responses from Shippers to first draft AUGS Increased availability of data Interim Unidentified Gas figures supplied, subject to restrictions No LSP DM/NDM split at this stage Some data still unavailable Data verification regime to be finalised Shipper comments on first draft AUGS and AUGE responses In annexe document due to size

Unidentified Gas Calculation

Unidentified Gas Definition Unidentified Gas is defined as consisting of: Unregistered and Shipperless sites Independent Gas Transporter CSEP setup and registration delays Shipper-responsible theft Metering bias Other Shrinkage estimate error Open bypass valves Meters passing unregistered gas Unknown sites

Unidentified Gas Calculation Calculated directly: Total Unidentified Gas (assigned to LSP market sector) Unregistered and Shipperless sites Independent Gas Transporter CSEP setup and registration delays Metering bias Calculated by subtraction Balancing Factor (equal to Theft plus Other)

Unidentified Gas Location Allocation process assigns UG to both LSP and SSP sectors LSP-assigned UG Consists of UG arising from both LSP and SSP sectors Accounts for the majority of total UG Can be calculated using available data SSP-assigned UG Consists of UG arising from both LSP and SSP sectors Is relatively small Cannot be calculated using currently available data

Unidentified Gas Allocation Bias due to AQ Change 0% Year-on-Year AQ Change by Market Sector -2% -4% -6% Percentage -8% -10% SSP LSP -12% -14% -16% -18% 2007 2008 2009 2010

Unidentified Gas Effects of Allocation Bias Existence of allocation bias means that Not all of RbD is Unidentified Gas Majority of Unidentified Gas is assigned to LSP sector Based on available data Long-term RbD bias can be estimated Allocation bias can be estimated Total LSP-assigned UG can be estimated This can then be split between market sectors

Unidentified Gas Long Term RbD Bias Monthly RbD affected by random and non-random factors Annual cycle Retrospective corrections Allocation bias Random allocation error Individual monthly or annual values affected by these factors Determine long-term bias Assumption that process is steady

Unidentified Gas Allocation Model Error Random Error Sample Bias NDM Sample not representative of NDM as a whole Parameter Values Biased (ALP, DAF) Data Inaccuracies LDZ Demand, DM Demand, Shrinkage & Stock Change Meter Churn (New & Isolated) AQ Inaccuracies AQ not representative of true consumption due to lag in data used for AQ calculation

Unidentified Gas Initial Allocation Error Meter Churn Sample Bias Data Errors Affected by all Factors D euc t = AQ euc t * 365 ALP euc t [ ] euc LDZ LDZ 1+ DAF * WCF * SF t t t PseudoSND AQ Inaccuracies Meter Churn and AQ Inaccuracies

Unidentified Gas Retrospective Allocation Like for like comparison of allocation using original and updated AQ Sensitivity of algorithm to AQ Includes WCF changes due to PseudoSND EUC variation in sensitivity to AQ Excludes Meters where AQ is not updated (~24% LSP)

Unidentified Gas Model AQ Bias Deeming Algorithm Comparison 100% 90% Allocation by Category (%) 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Change in LSP % LSP SSP 10% 0% Base Best Input Data Used

Unidentified Gas Annual AQ Review - LSP AQ 2010 Calculated Using May09-May10 1 st Oct 2008 1 st Oct 2009 1 st Oct 2010 Meter Read Period May 2009 May 2010 AQ Review for 2010

Unidentified Gas Model Bias Issues Interim results use AQ for following year Plan to use Mod81 data (now received) AQ change by EUC Scaling required Only 76% of LSP AQs successfully updated Data issues Wales South AQ vs Allocation

Unidentified Gas Unregistered and Shipperless Sites Six categories that contribute to UG Shipper Activity Orphaned Unregistered <12 Months Shipperless (Passed to Shipper) Shipperless (Shipper Specific Report) Shipperless <12 Months Calculate separately for LSP and SSP

Unidentified Gas Unregistered and Shipperless Sites LDZ Small Supply Point Supplied every two months Total AQ Value Large Supply Point Total AQ Value EA 96 1,177,688 6 944,521 EM 90 1,229,066 5 601,301 LC 1 1 0 0 LO 0 0 1 314,280 LS 0 0 0 0 LT 0 0 0 0 NE 34 433,652 4 698,689 NO 41 705,623 3 891,670 NT 142 2,406,276 12 2,729,470 NW 108 1,481,265 9 1,795,433 SC 185 2,447,118 13 4,346,438 SE 196 2,965,091 22 4,427,406 SO 124 1,226,012 12 1,976,493 SW 45 806,546 5 2,417,886 WM 67 768,477 7 1,173,366 WN 33 599,440 2 255,271 WS 63 732,422 3 3,616,303 Total 1,225 16,978,677 104 26,188,527 Annual profile applied (current based on EUC 03B for interim figures)

Unidentified Gas Unregistered and Shipperless Sites Shipper Activity and Orphaned Sites Calculation the same for both Average AQ for each snapshot period calculated Time of year profile applied Proportion of sites with meter that are flowing gas estimated Initial meter read data used Full calculation examples available AUGS Section 6.7 (Worked Example) Example Calculation spreadsheet

Unidentified Gas Unregistered and Shipperless Sites Unregistered <12 Months Calculation as for Shipper Activity/Orphaned sites No record of sites with meters for this category Estimate this from Shipper Activity/Orphaned sites data Remainder of calculation identical

Unidentified Gas Unregistered and Shipperless Sites Shipperless Sites Calculation of UG for PTS and SSrP identical All sites on report contributing to UG Time of year profile applied Shipperless <12 Months Data still outstanding

Unidentified Gas igt CSEPs Unidentified Gas arises from two sources Unknown projects Unregistered sites on known projects YEAR LDZ Count of Unknown Projects Sum of AQ Count of Supply Points 2011 EA 67 7,451,635 492 2011 EM 72 10,586,818 636 2011 NE 10 1,420,436 107 2011 NO 11 3,347,678 77 2011 NT 63 10,259,669 745 2011 NW 54 7,440,332 465 2011 SC 33 21,653,184 322 2011 SE 13 1,027,380 60 2011 SO 17 1,461,043 130 2011 SW 15 2,274,788 179 2011 WM 48 9,193,761 485 2011 WN 2 156,392 8 2011 WS 8 369,759 23 Totals 413 76,642,875 3,729

Unidentified Gas igt CSEPs Data Supplied Unknown projects summary Number and sites and AQ No split by market sector Registered sites on known CSEPs Split by EUC Unregistered sites on known CSEPs Split by EUC Preliminary calculations Composition of known CSEPs used to split unknown projects LSP SSP

Unidentified Gas igt CSEPs Currently data exists for a single point in time This is applied to full year Additional data will be supplied by Xoserve Trend analysis and extrapolation

Unidentified Gas Meter Error Contribute to UG only if there is an undetected and unresolved bias over time Offtake and DM metering errors occur and are usually under-reads RbD corrected when they are found Assumption that all are found and corrected at some stage Hence zero net contribution to UG over time SSP meter reads are not used in the allocation process Hence SSP meter errors do not contribute to UG Potential error from NDM LSP meters remains

Unidentified Gas Meter Error Typical calibration curve for an NDM LSP RPD meter is as follows: Flow Rate vs Error: Meter 1 1.2 1 Qmin Qt Qmax 0.8 0.6 Rgestration error (%) 0.4 0.2 0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1 -1.2 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Flow rate (scfh- air)

Unidentified Gas Meter Error Meters consistently working at or around Q min will under-read and hence contribute to UG. Average under-read assumed to be 1.5% (based on a selection of calibration graphs) Meters consistently working at or around Q max will over-read and hence reduce UG. Average over-read assumed to be 0.5% (based on a selection of calibration graphs) Meter capacity and AQ information best data available Convert AQ to hourly rate and compare to meter capacity Use thresholds of 1% Q max and 95% Q max to identify meters consistently underreading and over-reading

Unidentified Gas Balancing Factor LSP Assigned UG = Average RbD Algorithm Bias = Shipperless UG + igt CSEPs UG + Meter Error UG + Balancing Factor Shipperless, igt CSEPs and Meter Error calculated directly Balancing Factor calculated by subtraction Balancing Factor is: Theft Shrinkage estimate error Open bypass valves Meters passing unregistered gas Unknown sites

Unidentified Gas Balancing Factor Balancing factor is, over time, nearly all theft Shrinkage error will sum to zero over time unless shrinkage models are biased Other elements are small or negligible Balancing volume therefore split between market sectors using relative theft levels, based on analysis of both detected and alleged thefts: SSP 92.1% LSP 7.9%

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures Overall Summary by type SSP GWh LSP GWh Total GWh igt Cseps 693 48 741 Shipperless/Unregistered 166 1614 1780 Meter Errors 0 17 17 Theft + Other 3797 326 4123 Total (inc Independents) 4656 2005 6661

Unidentified Gas percentage split by type Percentage total UG by UG type 11% 62% 27% igt Cseps Shipperless/Unregistered Meter Errors Theft + Other 0%

Unidentified Gas percentage split by type SSP Percentage SSP UG by UG type 15% 4% 0% igt Cseps Shipperless/Unregistered Meter Errors Theft + Other 81%

Unidentified Gas percentage split by type LSP Percentage LSP UG by UG type 16% 2% 1% igt Cseps Shipperless/Unregistered Meter Errors Theft + Other 81%

Unidentified Gas SSP/LSP split by LDZ UG by LDZ split by SSP/LSP 1200.00 1000.00 UG/GWh 800.00 600.00 400.00 200.00 0.00 LSP SSP EA EM NE NO NT NW SC SE SO SW WM WN WS LC LO LS LT LW LDZ

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures EA EM NE SSP LSP SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 56.38 3.00 163.45 5.64 15.41 0.65 Shipperless/Unregistered 11.87 134.73 13.56 98.75 8.82 53.04 - Shipper Activity 0.08 1.14 0.11 0.21 0.08 0.12 - Orphaned 3.23 41.30 2.87 35.70 1.79 18.21 - Unregistered <12 Months 3.03 41.75 4.05 50.80 3.58 22.25 - Shipperless PTS 1.31 0.96 1.37 0.72 0.42 0.78 - Shipperless SSrP 4.22 49.57 5.15 11.32 2.94 11.68 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 1.75 0.00 2.49 0.00 1.47 Total Directly Measured 68.25 139.47 177.01 106.87 24.23 55.16 Theft + Other 689.44 59.14 377.34 32.37 378.69 32.48 Total 757.69 198.61 554.35 139.24 402.92 87.64 RbD Bias 1166.0 1039.8 712.2 Algorithm Bias 209.7 346.2 221.6 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 956.3 693.6 490.6 Aggregate Theft + Other 748.6 409.7 411.2

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures NO NT NW SSP LSP SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 32.42 2.84 48.16 9.46 59.59 9.48 Shipperless/Unregistered 5.72 65.77 21.64 123.06 16.37 514.22 - Shipper Activity 0.05 0.03 0.21 0.77 0.10 0.60 - Orphaned 1.60 32.78 6.44 37.77 4.52 63.15 - Unregistered <12 Months 2.17 29.45 4.04 71.97 5.10 431.33 - Shipperless PTS 0.57 0.63 2.55 3.18 1.46 1.46 - Shipperless SSrP 1.33 2.88 8.39 9.38 5.19 17.69 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00-4.04 0.00 2.49 0.00 2.71 Total Directly Measured 38.14 64.58 69.80 135.02 75.96 526.41 Theft + Other 329.62 28.27 58.38 5.01 193.18 16.57 Total 367.76 92.85 128.18 140.03 269.14 542.98 RbD Bias 610.4 466.3 1259.2 Algorithm Bias 149.8 198.1 447.1 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 460.6 268.2 812.1 Aggregate Theft + Other 357.9 63.4 209.8

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures SC SE SO SSP LSP SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 110.36 5.59 26.81 4.52 23.64 1.57 Shipperless/Unregistered 14.25 177.04 34.26 110.22 11.81 126.16 - Shipper Activity 0.21 0.55 0.22 0.91 0.15 0.39 - Orphaned 3.04 31.77 4.54 30.12 1.63 19.09 - Unregistered <12 Months 5.37 101.31 8.89 30.31 3.79 51.30 - Shipperless PTS 2.50 4.44 3.01 4.24 1.33 2.24 - Shipperless SSrP 3.12 38.97 17.60 44.63 4.92 53.14 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 1.92 0.00 2.39 0.00 1.50 Total Directly Measured 124.61 184.55 61.08 117.12 35.45 129.23 Theft + Other 45.04 3.86 397.61 34.11 299.19 25.66 Total 169.66 188.41 458.69 151.23 334.64 154.90 RbD Bias 706.8 974.1 675.8 Algorithm Bias 348.8 364.1 186.2 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 358.1 609.9 489.5 Aggregate Theft + Other 48.9 431.7 324.9

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures SW WM WN SSP LSP SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 69.13 1.00 57.62 2.96 6.41 0.16 Shipperless/Unregistered 9.68 88.09 10.32 71.71 2.42 2.70 - Shipper Activity 0.13 0.68 0.08 0.27 0.07 0.00 - Orphaned 2.24 24.25 2.41 23.01 0.25 1.43 - Unregistered <12 Months 5.31 54.01 3.35 43.54 0.92 1.25 - Shipperless PTS 0.66 0.98 0.80 0.90 0.67 0.02 - Shipperless SSrP 1.33 8.18 3.67 4.00 0.51 0.00 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 1.63 0.00 2.22 0.00 0.22 Total Directly Measured 78.81 90.73 67.94 76.89 8.82 3.08 Theft + Other 236.34 20.27 470.57 40.36 29.06 2.49 Total 315.15 111.00 538.51 117.25 37.88 5.57 RbD Bias 598.2 1149.4 84.6 Algorithm Bias 172.1 493.6 41.2 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 426.1 655.8 43.5 Aggregate Theft + Other 256.6 510.9 31.6

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures WS SSP LSP igt CSEPs 23.87 1.22 Shipperless/Unregistered 4.71 47.99 - Shipper Activity 0.02 0.22 - Orphaned 0.85 14.30 - Unregistered <12 Months 1.28 28.15 - Shipperless PTS 0.67 3.72 - Shipperless SSrP 1.89 1.60 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 0.59 Total Directly Measured 28.58 49.80 Theft + Other 289.32 24.82 Total 317.90 74.61 RbD Bias 419.6 Algorithm Bias 27.0 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 392.5 Aggregate Theft + Other 314.1

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures LC LO LS SSP LSP SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shipperless/Unregistered 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.31 0.18 0.11 - Shipper Activity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 - Orphaned 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 - Unregistered <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.17 0.00 - Shipperless PTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 - Shipperless SSrP 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.09 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Directly Measured 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.31 0.18 0.11 Theft + Other -0.01 0.00 1.98 0.17 0.11 0.01 Total 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.48 0.29 0.12 RbD Bias -0.9 3.0 0.0 Algorithm Bias -0.7 0.5-0.4 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 0.0 2.5 0.4 Aggregate Theft + Other 0.0 2.1 0.1

Unidentified Gas Interim Figures LT LW SSP LSP SSP LSP igt CSEPs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shipperless/Unregistered 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Shipper Activity 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Orphaned 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Unregistered <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Shipperless PTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Shipperless SSrP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Shipperless <12 Months 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Meter Errors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Directly Measured 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Theft + Other 0.56 0.05 1.17 0.10 Total 0.56 0.05 1.17 0.10 RbD Bias 0.8 1.8 Algorithm Bias 0.2 0.5 Unidentified Gas (LSP Assigned) 0.6 1.3 Aggregate Theft + Other 0.6 1.3

Unidentified Gas Next Steps Supply of outstanding data items Agreement of final methodology Production of final Unidentified Gas figures DM/NDM split of LSP Unidentified Gas Inclusion of Shipperless <12 Months category Extrapolation of figures to 2012/13 formula year Review/check of EA LDZ (2x total UG vs other LDZs) Review/check NT, WN (.5x total UG vs other LDZs) Review/check LSP UG for NT, NW, SC (high compared to other LDZs) Assessment of SSP and LSP meter read data quality with reference to alternative approach

Unidentified Gas Additional Information Worked example calculation in second draft AUGS Full spreadsheet-based Unregistered and Shipperless Sites calculation for a single LDZ available All calculation spreadsheets used by the AUGE available with supporting documentation

Summary Q/A Areas of concern? Areas where further explanation is required? Comments or questions? The AUGE can be contacted via AUGE@gl-group.com

Thank you for your attention