Enhancing sensitivity of gravitational wave antennas, such as LIGO, via light-atom interaction

Similar documents
Squeezing manipulation with atoms

Quantum enhanced magnetometer and squeezed state of light tunable filter

Squeezed states of light - generation and applications

Quantum optics and squeezed states of light

Generation of squeezed vacuum with hot and ultra-cold Rb atoms

Squeezed Light for Gravitational Wave Interferometers

Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection

The Quantum Limit and Beyond in Gravitational Wave Detectors

Frequency dependent squeezing for quantum noise reduction in second generation Gravitational Wave detectors. Eleonora Capocasa

Quantum Mechanical Noises in Gravitational Wave Detectors

Study of a quantum nondemolition interferometer using ponderomotive squeezing

Squeezed Light and Quantum Imaging with Four-Wave Mixing in Hot Atoms

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Status of LIGO. David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004 LIGO-G M

Gravitational wave cosmology Lecture 2. Daniel Holz The University of Chicago

Quantum-noise reduction techniques in a gravitational-wave detector

New directions for terrestrial detectors

Searching for Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LIGO

LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans. Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04

LIGO s Detection of Gravitational Waves from Two Black Holes

QND for advanced GW detectors

Overview Ground-based Interferometers. Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05

Development of ground based laser interferometers for the detection of gravitational waves

Status and Prospects for LIGO

Prospects for joint transient searches with LOFAR and the LSC/Virgo gravitational wave interferometers

Status and Plans for Future Generations of Ground-based Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Antennas

Day 3: Ultracold atoms from a qubit perspective

The Advanced LIGO detectors at the beginning of the new gravitational wave era

Optomechanics and spin dynamics of cold atoms in a cavity

How to measure a distance of one thousandth of the proton diameter? The detection of gravitational waves

Long-term strategy on gravitational wave detection from European groups

Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves

Innovative Technologies for the Gravitational-Wave Detectors LIGO and Virgo

Advanced Workshop on Nanomechanics September Quantum Measurement in an Optomechanical System

The LIGO Project: a Status Report

Present and Future. Nergis Mavalvala October 09, 2002

The Status of Enhanced LIGO.

0.5 atoms improve the clock signal of 10,000 atoms

Do we need quantum light to test quantum memory? M. Lobino, C. Kupchak, E. Figueroa, J. Appel, B. C. Sanders, Alex Lvovsky

How to listen to the Universe?

Quantum Noise in Mirror-Field Systems: Beating the Standard Quantum IARD2010 Limit 1 / 23

Figure 1: An example of the stretching and contracting of space-time caused by a gravitational wave.

Advanced LIGO, Advanced VIRGO and KAGRA: Precision Measurement for Astronomy. Stefan Ballmer For the LVC Miami 2012 Dec 18, 2012 LIGO-G

GEO 600: Advanced Techniques in Operation

Radiation pressure effects in interferometric measurements

Lecture 9. PMTs and Laser Noise. Lecture 9. Photon Counting. Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs) Laser Phase Noise. Relative Intensity

LIGO Observational Results

Gravitational Waves. Physics, Technology, Astronomy and Opportunities. Unnikrishnan. C. S. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai

LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY - LIGO - CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Gravitational Wave Detection from the Ground Up

Gravitational Wave Astronomy

Multimode Entanglement in. Continuous Variables

Optical Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Detection

Quantum Memory with Atomic Ensembles. Yong-Fan Chen Physics Department, Cheng Kung University

An Overview of Advanced LIGO Interferometry

File name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

Scatterometer at NAOJ: applying material investigations for KAGRA

LIGO and the Quest for Gravitational Waves

SUB-NATURAL-WIDTH N-RESONANCES OBSERVED IN LARGE FREQUENCY INTERVAL

Black Holes: From Speculations to Observations. Thomas Baumgarte Bowdoin College

Exploring the Warped Side of the Universe

Thermal Noise in Non-Equilibrium Steady State Hannah Marie Fair Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (August 2014)

How did physicists detect Gravitational Waves? Some tools that revealed the GW event. C. Kurtsiefer, Physics enrichment camp NUS

Search for inspiralling neutron stars in LIGO S1 data

What can LIGO detect? Abstract

LIGO I status and advanced LIGO proposal

Towards quantum metrology with N00N states enabled by ensemble-cavity interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics

The gravitational wave detector VIRGO

GRAVITATIONAL WAVE SOURCES AND RATES FOR LISA

ELECTROMAGNETICALLY INDUCED TRANSPARENCY IN RUBIDIUM 85. Amrozia Shaheen

Optical Cavity Tests of Lorentz Invariance

*Williams College, Williamstown, MA **U. of Oklahoma funding from AFOSR, DARPA

Phasor Calculations in LIGO

Thermal Corrective Devices for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers

Dynamics of star clusters containing stellar mass black holes: 1. Introduction to Gravitational Waves

Gravitationswellen. Wirkung auf Punktmassen. für astrophysikalische Quellen h ~ h L L

The status of VIRGO. To cite this version: HAL Id: in2p

Experimental Demonstration of Spinor Slow Light

Interferometry beyond the Quantum Limit: From Squeezed Vacuum, Stiff Photons and Other Ways to Trick Heisenberg. Stefan Hild

Emergence of Electromagnetically Induced Absorption in a Perturbation Solution of Optical Bloch Equations 1

6WDWXVRI/,*2. Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory. Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002 LIGO-G D

Faraday Isolator Performance at High Laser Power

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 28 Apr 2010

ET: Einstein Telescope

A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit

Status of the International Second-generation Gravitational-wave Detector Network

Gravitational Wave Detectors: Back to the Future

Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy

Cavity decay rate in presence of a Slow-Light medium

Guided Acoustic Wave Brillouin Scattering (GAWBS) in Photonic Crystal Fibers (PCFs)

LISA: Probing the Universe with Gravitational Waves. Tom Prince Caltech/JPL. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna LISA

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

Probing the Universe for Gravitational Waves

MEMORY FOR LIGHT as a quantum black box. M. Lobino, C. Kupchak, E. Figueroa, J. Appel, B. C. Sanders, Alex Lvovsky

Searching for Big Bang relicts with LIGO. Stefan W. Ballmer For the LSC/VIRGO collaboration GW2010, University of Minnesota October 16, 2010

Gravity. Newtonian gravity: F = G M1 M2/r 2

Experimental measurements of coating mechanical loss factors

Atom assisted cavity cooling of a micromechanical oscillator in the unresolved sideband regime

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Suggested readings: Camp and Cornish, Ann Rev Nucl Part Sci 2004 Schutz, gr-qc/ Kip Thorne WEB course

Transcription:

Enhancing sensitivity of gravitational wave antennas, such as LIGO, via light-atom interaction Eugeniy E. Mikhailov The College of William & Mary, USA New Laser Scientists, 4 October 04 Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 / 8

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory L = 4 km h 0 3 L 0 0 m Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

LIGO sensitivity, S5 run, June 006 e-6 e-7 e-8 Strain Sensitivity for the LIGO Interferometers S5 Performance - June 006 LIGO-G06093-0-Z LHO 4km - (006.03.3) S5: Binary Inspiral Range (.4/.4 Msun) = 4.5 Mpc LLO 4km - (006.06.04) S5: Binary Inspiral Range (.4/.4 Msun) = 5. Mpc LHO km - (006.06.8) S5: Binary Inspiral Range (.4/.4 Msun) = 7.4 Mpc LIGO I SRD Goal, 4km h[f], /Sqrt[Hz] e-9 e-0 e- e- e-3 e-4 0 00 000 0000 Frequency [Hz] Inspiral search range during S5 is 4Mpc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 0 / 8

Upgrade to advanced LIGO Goals How Factor of 5 increase in sensitivity inspiral range from 0 Mpc to 350 Mpc Factor of 3000 in event rate One day > entire -year initial data run better seismic isolation decreasing thermal noise higher laser power injection of squeezed state Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 / 8

Squeezed quantum states zoo Unsqueezed coherent φ φ Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

Squeezed quantum states zoo Unsqueezed coherent Amplitude squeezed φ φ φ Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

Squeezed quantum states zoo Unsqueezed coherent Amplitude squeezed φ φ φ Phase squeezed φ Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

Squeezed quantum states zoo Unsqueezed coherent Amplitude squeezed φ φ θ Phase squeezed Vacuum squeezed φ θ Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

Squeezing and interferometer Vacuum input laser Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 4 / 8

Squeezing and interferometer Vacuum input Squeezed input laser laser Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 4 / 8

Limiting noise - Quantum Optical noise Next generation of LIGO will be quantum optical noise limited at almost all detection frequencies. shot noise Uncertainty in number of photons h P () Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 6 / 8

Limiting noise - Quantum Optical noise Next generation of LIGO will be quantum optical noise limited at almost all detection frequencies. shot noise Uncertainty in number of photons h P () radiation pressure noise Photons impart momentum to mirrors P h M f 4 () Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 6 / 8

Limiting noise - Quantum Optical noise Next generation of LIGO will be quantum optical noise limited at almost all detection frequencies. shot noise Uncertainty in number of photons h P () radiation pressure noise Photons impart momentum to mirrors P h M f 4 () There is no optimal light power to suit all detection frequency. Optimal power depends on desired detection frequency. Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 6 / 8

Interferometer sensitivity improvement with squeezing Projected advanced LIGO sensitivity F. Ya. Khalili Phys. Rev. D 8, 00 (00) Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 7 / 8

Squeezing and detection noise quadratures Noise vs quadrature angle θ Noise (db) 8 7 6 5 4 3 0 - - 4 6 8 0 Quadrature angle (Arb.Units) Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 8 / 8

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) filter Probe transparency dependence on its detuning. a Transparency [Arb. Unit] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. ω p 0-00 -50 0 50 00 Probe detuning [Arb. Unit] c b ω bc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 9 / 8

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT) filter Probe transparency dependence on its detuning. a Probe transparency dependence on its detuning. Transparency [Arb. Unit] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. ω p ω d Transparency [Arb. Unit] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. 0-00 -50 0 50 00 Probe detuning [Arb. Unit] b ω bc c 0-00 -50 0 50 00 Probe detuning [Arb. Unit] Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 9 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter ( V out V out ) ( A = + A A A + ) ( V in V in ) [ ( )] ( + A + + A ) A ± = (T + ± T ) a ω p ω d c b ω bc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 0 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter ( V out V out ) ( A = + A A A + ) ( V in V in ) [ ( )] ( + A + + A ) A ± = (T + ± T ) a ω p ω d c b ω bc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 0 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter ( V out V out ) ( A = + A A A + ) ( V in V in ) [ ( )] ( + A + + A ) A ± = (T + ± T ) a ω p ω d c b ω bc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 0 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter ( V out V out ) ( A = + A A A + ) ( V in V in ) [ ( )] ( + A + + A ) A ± = (T + ± T ) a ω p ω d c b ω bc Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 0 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter setup Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 / 8

Squeezing and EIT filter setup Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 / 8

EIT filter and measurements without light Transmission (Arb. Units) 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.5 - -.5 - -0.5 0 0.5.5 Noise Frequency (MHz) Signal in the noise quadratures Coherent signal ωp b ω bc a ω d c 4 4 0 0 8 8 6 6 4 4 0 0 - - -4-4 0 0.5.5 0 0.5.5 Noise Frequency (MHz) Noise Frequency (MHz) Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 / 8 Noise power (dbm) Noise power (dbm)

Wide EIT filter and squeezing a ωp Peak ω d transmission = 5% b ω bc c FWHM= 4MHz 0 Input anti-squeezed noise Noise power (db) 8 6 4 0 (i) attenuated (iii) (v) (vi) (iv) (ii) 0.5.0.5 Noise frequency (MHz).0 Calculated anti-squeezed Measured anti-squeezed Measured squeezed noise Calculated squeezed noise Input squeezed noise Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 3 / 8

Narrow EIT filter and squeezing a ωp Peak ω d transmission = 50% b ω bc c FWHM= MHz 0 Input anti-squeezed noise Noise power (db) 8 6 4 0 filtered (iii) (v) (vi) (iv) (ii) 0.5.0.5.0 Noise frequency (MHz) (i) Calculated anti-squeezed Measured anti-squeezed Measured squeezed noise Calculated squeezed noise Input squeezed noise Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 4 / 8

Squeezing angle rotation θ θ ( V out V out ) = Locked at 300kHz ( cos ϕ + sin ϕ + sin ϕ + cos ϕ + ) ( A + A A A + ) ( V in V in Locked at 00kHz ) [ ( )] ( + A + + A ) Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 6 / 8

Summary It is possible to boost sensitivity of gravitational wave antennas via light-atom interaction. Proposed work narrow EIT resonance/filter maintain high transmission match squeezing filter to LIGO λ = 064 nm find atomic media which is resonant to 064 nm use existing methods to up convert atom-filtered squeezing λ from 795 nm to 064 nm Eugeniy E. Mikhailov (W&M) Sensitivity boost with light-atom interaction New Laser Scientists, 04 7 / 8