SS-433/W50 at TeV Energies

Similar documents
A New TeV Source in the Vicinity of Cygnus OB2

Observing TeV Gamma Rays from the Jet Interaction Regions of SS 433 with HAWC

Recent Observations of Supernova Remnants

The H.E.S.S. Standard Analysis Technique

Discovery of TeV Gamma-ray Emission Towards Supernova Remnant SNR G Last Updated Tuesday, 30 July :01

HEGRA Observations of Galactic Sources

Recent Results from CANGAROO

Galactic sources in GeV/TeV Astronomy and the new HESS Results

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

Particle Acceleration in the Universe

Extreme high-energy variability of Markarian 421

TeV Gamma Rays from Synchrotron X-ray X

Neutrino Oscillations and Astroparticle Physics (5) John Carr Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille (IN2P3/CNRS) Pisa, 10 May 2002

Pulsar Wind Nebulae as seen by Fermi-Large Area Telescope

Observations of the Shell-Type Supernova Remnants RX J and RX J (Vela Junior) with H.E.S.S.

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

Observation of sub-tev gamma-rays from RX J with the CANGAROO-II telescope

RECENT RESULTS FROM CANGAROO

A pulsar wind nebula associated with PSR J as the powering source of TeV J

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

OBSERVATIONS OF VERY HIGH ENERGY GAMMA RAYS FROM M87 BY VERITAS

VERITAS Observations of Supernova Remnants

Supernova Remnants and GLAST

H.E.S.S. Unidentified Gamma-ray Sources in a Pulsar Wind Nebula Scenario And HESS J

Results from H.E.S.S.

The 2006 Giant Flare in PKS and Unidentified TeV Sources. Justin Finke Naval Research Laboratory 5 June 2008

Constraints on cosmic-ray origin from gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants

Simulations for H.E.S.S.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 9 Nov 2010

Fermi-Large Area Telescope Observations of Pulsar Wind Nebulae and their associated pulsars

HAWC Observation of Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae

TeV Gammas and Cosmic ray production in Tycho s SNR and Geminga

Gamma-ray Astrophysics with VERITAS: Exploring the violent Universe

Recent discoveries from TeV and X- ray non-thermal emission from SNRs

A New Look at the Galactic Diffuse GeV Excess

The European Southern Observatory

Cosmic Ray Electrons and GC Observations with H.E.S.S.

THE MAGIC TELESCOPES. Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov Telescopes

CTB 37A & CTB 37B - The fake twins SNRs

Milagro A TeV Observatory for Gamma Ray Bursts

Spatial Profile of the Emission from Pulsar Wind Nebulae with steady-state 1D Modeling

Dieter Horns, MPI-K, Heidelberg 3 H46+48 (Aharonian et al. ) ES (Götting et al. ICRC ) Mkn 5 (Bradbury et al. 997, Aharonian et al. 997,999a,999

TEV GAMMA RAY ASTRONOMY WITH VERITAS

SuperCANGAROO. Symposium on Future Projects in Cosmic Ray Physics, June 26-28, 28, Masaki Mori

Status and Future of the HESS experiment

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

The Inner Region of the Milky Way Galaxy in High Energy Gamma Rays

Aharonian Felix. I Scientific Work. II Conferences and educational activities

TenTen: A new IACT Array for Multi-TeV Gamma-Ray Astronomy

Performance and Sensitivity of H.E.S.S.

Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

Gamma rays from supernova remnants in clumpy environments.! Stefano Gabici APC, Paris

VERITAS Observations of Starburst Galaxies. The Discovery of VHE Gamma Rays from a Starburst Galaxy

The LHAASO-KM2A detector array and physical expectations. Reporter:Sha Wu Mentor: Huihai He and Songzhan Chen

Are supernova remnants PeV accelerators? The contribution of HESS observations

On the scientific motivation for a wide field-of-view TeV gamma-ray observatory in the Southern Hemisphere

Observing Galactic Sources at GeV & TeV Energies (A Short Summary)

Detection of TeV Gamma-Rays from Extended Sources with Milagro

Very High-Energy Gamma- Ray Astrophysics

Diffuse TeV emission from the Cygnus region

High Energy Emission. Brenda Dingus, LANL HAWC

An Auger Observatory View of Centaurus A

Galactic diffuse gamma-rays

The Extreme Universe Rene A. Ong Univ. of Michigan Colloquium University of California, Los Angeles 23 March 2005

Correlation between X-ray and gamma-ray emission in TeV blazars

The Milky Way in VHE γ-rays. Christopher van Eldik Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Heidelberg

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae: Deductions from X ray (and gamma ray) Observations

Evidence for a New Source of TeV Gamma Rays from Angular Correlation Studies of the Milagro and Tibet Northern Sky Surveys

Kathrin Egberts Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg for the H.E.S.S. Collaboration

Galactic Sources with Milagro and HAWC. Jordan Goodman for the HAWC and Milagro Collaborations

A. Takada (Kyoto Univ.)

GLAST and beyond GLAST: TeV Astrophysics

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

MILAGRO. 1 The Milagro detector. SABRINA CASANOVA for THE MILAGRO COLLABORATION. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, US

High-Energy Neutrinos Produced by Interactions of Relativistic Protons in Shocked Pulsar Winds

CANGAROO. September 5, :13 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in morim

Highlights from the ARGO-YBJ Experiment

PoS(Extremesky 2011)036

THE ENIGMATIC X-RAY JET OF 3C120

TeV Galactic Source Physics with CTA

Status of the MAGIC telescopes

The Secondary Universe

Cherenkov Telescope Array Status Report. Salvatore Mangano (CIEMAT) On behalf of the CTA consortium

Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic γ-ray Sources

Astro2020 Science White Paper Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars

Shell supernova remnants as cosmic accelerators: II

Search for TeV Radiation from Pulsar Tails

The TAIGA experiment - a hybrid detector for very high energy gamma-ray astronomy and cosmic ray physics in the Tunka valley

Gamma-Ray Astronomy from the Ground

VHE Gamma-Ray Future Project: Beyond CANGAROO

Observation of the Southern High Energy Peaked BL Lac Object PKS with CANGAROO-II Telescope

Fermi: Highlights of GeV Gamma-ray Astronomy

GAMMA-RAYS FROM MASSIVE BINARIES

VERITAS: exploring the high energy Universe

PoS(ICRC2017)740. Observing the Galactic Plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. CTA consortium represented by Roberta Zanin and Jamie Holder

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 Apr 1999

Two Flavors of Radio Jets

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

Production of Secondary Cosmic Rays in Supernova Remnants

Transcription:

SS-433/W50 at TeV Energies Gavin P. Rowell for the HEGRA Collaboration arxiv:astro-ph/0104288v1 17 Apr 2001 Max Planck Institut für Kernphysik D-69029 Heidelberg, Germany Abstract The HEGRA CT-System was used to search for TeV gammarays from the microquasar and supernova remnant combination SS- 433/W50 over the 1998 and 1999 observing seasons, resulting in about 20 hours of useful data. An analysis of various extended sources of location guided by X-Ray observations reveals no evidence for TeV emission at photon energies above 1 TeV, with resulting 99% upper limits in the range 8 to 10% of the Crab flux. For one of these locations, the eastern jet termination, a model predicting a presently detectable TeV gamma-ray flux via the inverse Compton upscattering of microwave background photons is now somewhat constrained. The results and model contraints are briefly discussed. 1 Introduction The remarkable object SS-433 is a galactic microquasar [20] powered by a compact object driving a parsec-scale jet. The jet is possibly associated with the supernova remnant W50. A strong motivation for observations at TeV γ-ray energies exist by virture of the extraordinary kinetic quiescant power output of the jets in the range 10 39 to 10 41 erg s 1 [19, 13, 22]. This power amounts to a significant fraction of that required to maintain the galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) flux at Earth (few 10 41 erg s 1 [6]). SS- 433/W50 may therefore be one of the most powerful, and indeed significant sites of GCR acceleration in our Galaxy. Aharonian & Atoyan [2] (hereafter, AA) have suggested that an appreciable flux of TeV γ-rays may be produced by inverse Compton scattering of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons at the eastern jet termination shock, 60 east of SS-433 (labelled as e3 [22]. See figure 1), representing an interaction between the eastern jet particles and interstellar medium (ISM). A non-relativistic shock of the type found in SNR may 1

be capable of accelerating ISM particles to multi-tev energies, and is suggestedbythespatialcorrelationbetweenradioandverysteep(γ = 3.7 +2.3 10.7 ) X-ray synchrotron emission (from ROSAT & ASCA data) [22, 7, 9]. The X-ray emission from e3 however may also be of a thermal origin (although it is featureless!) since a power-law and thermal Bremsstrahlung relation are equally well fit, when considering data only from ROSAT and ASCA at energies below 10 kev. Strong motivation for concentrating our effort on the jet termination region is the fact that most of the jet energy is mechanical in nature [13], leading to significant power deposit at such regions. For example taking the estimated energy in relativistic electrons accounting for the e3 X-ray flux at 400 10 46 erg [22], the total power in relativistic particles (electrons + baryons) at e3 amounts to 10 39 erg s 1, for a source lifetime of 10 4 yrs. And finally, a detection of TeV gamma-ray emission linked to e3, would unambiguously prove that the shock is capable of accelerating electrons to multi-tev energies, since alternative hypotheses to the synchrotron model for hard X-ray tails do exist (e.g. thermal bremsstrahlung and see also [16]). Moving closer to SS-433 along the eastern jet, a hardening of the X- ray spectrum is noticed. The power law fit to the inner regions, labeled e1 & e2 [22] is favoured only after including X-ray data from RXTE at energies greater than 10 kev [23]. X-ray emission at e1 and e2 may result from direct synchrotron [22], inverse Compton, and/or synchrotron-self- Compton emission. The latter two options considered by [5] relating to flaring episodes were found to require a B-field well below equipartition values (in this scenario 0.7 G). The direct synchrotron option would also predict a spatial correlation at radio energies, not presently seen. These inner regions are therefore more complicated to interpret than that of e3. 2 Observations & Results Data were collected using the HEGRA CT-System 1, a series of 5 atmospheric Cerenkov telescopes operating in coincidence. Each telescope uses a multi-pixel camera of photomulitplier tubes (PMTs) to parametrise the angular distribution of extensive air shower (EAS) Cerenkov radiation initiated by γ-ray primaries. The CT-System is situated on the Roque de los Muchachos at La Palma (2200m asl, 28 45 N 17 54 W). The coincident trigger ensures a minimum of 2 telescopes view the EAS, and hence accurate reconstruction of the arrival direction on an event-by-event basis [14]. 1 High Energy Gamma Ray Astrophysics Cerenkov Telescope 2

HEGRA CT-System PSF Figure 1: ROSAT PSPC image (0.1 to 2.4 kev) revealing the eastern side of the SS-433/W50 association. Defined are a number of areas (e1, e2, e3) where separate spectral X-ray analyses were performed [22]. Included is a circle depicting the PSF (with radius, σ=0.1 ) for a point source of TeV γ-rays as imaged by the HEGRA CT-System. The tracking position for HEGRA data discussed in this work is the centre of the e2 circle. 3

At epochs covering SS-433 observations described here, the CT-System achieved an angular resolution, the standard deviation of a Gaussian fit (point spread function, PSF) of 0.1 at a modal energy threshold of 1.0 TeV for γ-rays. The detection of γ-ray images must be made against a strong background of cosmic-ray-initiated EAS. This background may be suppressed by exploiting the physical differences in EAS development between γ-ray and CR EAS, leading to differences in image shape. CR EAS are also isotropic in terms of arrival direction and therefore will be distributed as an essentially flat background against a source of γ-rays. The so-called mean-scaled-width (msw) parameter is used to reject CR images according to shape. A parameter, θ, the angular difference between the source and reconstructed arrival position provides CR rejection based on direction. Details of the direction reconstruction may be found in [11] and overall rejection efficiencies in [14]. Optimal values for θ and msw, selected from results of Monte Carlo simulations, have been validated against the steady TeV emission of the Crab, and variable emission from Mrk 501 & Mrk 421. A total of 19.3 hours observations were accepted for analysis following removal of data adversely affected by weather conditions. Not included in this report are results from a more recently completed scan of the Galactic Plane which included SS-433[1]. Overall results will be discussed in a future paper. Observations were carried out using a series of ON source and OFF source tracking modes. OFF source data were taken from regions separated in right ascension such that matching elevation bands 2 were achieved in both ON and OFF source data. A recently developed method [21] that enables the background to be determined from ON source observations is actually used in these analyses. This method estimates the background from larger statistics than that of OFF source observations (by roughly a factor of 3), and is temporally and spatially consistent with ON source data. A small systematic bias introduced by this method amounting to a < ±10% over/under-estimation of the background is easily parametrised and therefore corrected. The field of view (FOV) of the HEGRA CT- System with a radius 1.5 (trigger efficiency 80% of the on-axis value), adequately covers the eastern jet region imaged by ROSAT. For the analysis of HEGRA data, a number of regions in the FOV were chosen a-priori as extended sources of a size guided by results at X-ray energies, namely, the regions e1 to e3, and SS-433 itself. For an extended source of radius θ s, the optimal cut on event direction used in this analysis, θ op, is given by 2 The energy threshold of the HEGRA CT-System is dependent on the elevation 4

Source θ op (deg) ON OFF ON OFF a (σ) b φ 99% crab c φ 99% ph e1 0.13 155 420 +2.8 0.12 0.20 e2 0.21 342 1125 +1.2 0.12 0.22 e3 0.28 556 1953 +0.1 0.12 0.21 ss-433 0.15 166 541 +0.7 0.08 0.14 a. Statistical excess from eq. 9 of [17]. Norm. factor α = 0.283 b. φ 99% crab = 99% upper limit in units of Crab flux above 1 TeV, 1.75 10 11 ph cm 2 s 1 [3] c. φ 99% ph = 99% upper limit ( 10 11 ph cm 2 s 1 ) Table1: Resultsofasearchforγ-rayemissionabove1TeVatvarioussource locations around the eastern lobe of SS-433/W50. See text for descriptions of source names. θ 2 op = θ 2 pt + θ 2 s. θ pt is the optimal cut for a point source and is a factor 1.7 larger than the PSF radius, under background-dominated statistics. Table 1 presents the results of these analyses for each location within the FOV. 3 Discussion AA have argued that the inverse Compton scattering of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) photons by the same multi-tev electrons that produce the X-ray synchrotron flux could lead to an appreciable TeV γ-ray emission in the range 10 12 to 10 11 erg cm 2 s 1. Such levels are within the sensitivity range of current ground-based instruments for reasonable observation time (10 to 40 hours). The radio spectral index, α 0.5 [8] (a value of α 0.68 is calculated by [10], see also [9]) and spatial correlation of the radio and X-ray fluxes support the notion that diffusive shock acceleration of electrons to TeV energies is taking place at e3. AA find that an electron injection spectrum of the form N(E) E 2 exp( E/7TeV) fits well the radio and X-ray fluxes. Determination of the electron injection rate is tied to the B-field (in this model, considered a free parameter) since the radio flux B 1.5 L e where L e (erg s 1 ) is the injection power of electrons. AA also consider a number of source sizes, concluding that the measured size of the radio lobe corresponding to e3, of radius 0.25, is consistent with a diffusion coefficient implied from cosmic-ray transport in the galactic disk. A comparison of our upper limit for e3 with the predictions of AA (for various source sizes) is presented in figure 2. 5

. Figure 2: Integral flux of inverse Compton emission expected from the SS-433/W50 eastern lobe e3 region for different source radii [2]: 0.1 (dotdashed), 0.25 (solid, actual radio ear size), 0.5 (dashed) and 2.0 (dotted). Our upper limit is included and assumes a source radius of 0.25. OurupperlimitisclosetothepredictionofAAassumingasourceradius of 0.25, B-field of 10 µg, and injection rate of L e =10 38 erg s 1. Using the direct relationship between the expected IC (f γ ) and X-ray energy fluxes (f x ) arising from the same electrons: ( ) f x ( ǫkev) B 2 f γ ( ETeV) 10 10 5 (1) G we can establish a condition on the magnetic field B of the SNR. The mathematical caveat here is that the correct energy range in the TeV and kev regimes must be adhered to and that we assume that the emission regions of both components have the same size as in the model of AA. The IC (E TeV) and X-ray (ǫ kev) synchrotron energies in Eq. 1 are coupled according to [1]: ( )( ) E B ǫ 0.07 1TeV 10 5 kev (2) G so that for fluxes at E 1 TeV, a comparison with the X-ray flux at ǫ 0.1 kev is required for reasonable values of B 10 to 100 µg expected after 6

shock compression. Combining the X-ray flux at 0.1 kev with our TeV upper limit in Eq. 1 leads to a lower limit on the magnetic field within e3 of B 13 µg. Using an X-ray flux at slightly higher energies than 0.1 kev would naturally reduce this lower limit to values nearing that expected of the interstellar medium. The equipartition field for e3 is estimated at B 20 to 60 µg [22] (using a source region of radius 25 pc, or 0.25 at 5.5 kpc), and so clearly, we require a tighter upper limit in the TeV regime, in order to make more definite conclusions about the B-field in this region. 4 Conclusion A search for TeV γ-ray emission from the SS-433/W50 region, focussing on the termination-shock region e3, has revealed a 99% upper limit of 0.12 Crab flux units. The lower limit on the B-field at e3 determined within the framework of a synchrotron and inverse-compton model [2] is not high enough to contrain further the range of equipartition values for B as suggested by the X-ray results from ASCA and ROSAT [22]. Further observations on SS-433 with the HEGRA CT-System, recently completed, will be included in future work in order to improve our B constraint. Finally, with their predicted sensitivities at 1 TeV, the next generation groundbased instruments HESS, VERITAS and MAGIC [12, 18, 15] will almost certainly resolve theissueofwhetherornot thee3region isasiteof electron acceleration to multi-tev energies. References [1] Aharonian F.A., Atoyan A.M., Kifune T., 1997, MNRAS 291, 162 [2] Aharonian F.A. and Atoyan A.M. 1998, New Astron. Rev., 42, 579 [3] Aharonian F.A, Akhperjanian A.G., Barrio J.A. et al. 2000, ApJ 539, 317 [4] Aharonian F.A. Akhperjanian A.G., Barrio J.A. et al. 2001 A&A submitted [5] Band D.L., Grindlay J.E. 1986 ApJ, 311, 595 [6] Blandford R.D. and Ostriker J.P. 1980, ApJ, 237, 808 [7] Brinkmann W., Aschenbach B. and Kawai N. 1996, A&A 312, 306 7

[8] Downes A.J.B., Pauls T., Salter C.J. 1986, MNRAS 218, 393 [9] Dubner G.M., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1842 [10] Dubner G.M. 2000 priv. comm. [11] Hofmann W., Jung I., Konopelko A. et al. 1999, Astropart. Phys. 12, 135 [12] Hofmann et al. 1999, Towards a Major Atmospheric Cherenkov Detector - VI, pg 500, ed B.L. Dingus M.H. Salamon, D.B. Kieda (AIP Conf. Series 515, New York, 2000) [13] Kawai N. and Kotani T. 1999, Astron.Nachr., 320, 211 [14] Konopelko A., Hemberger M., Aharonian F.A., et al. 1999, Astropart. Phys. 10, 275 [15] Krennrich F. et al. 1999, Towards a Major Atmospheric Cherenkov Detector - VI, pg 515, ed B.L. Dingus M.H. Salamon, D.B. Kieda (AIP Conf. Series 515, New York, 2000) [16] Laming J.M. ApJ 499, 309 [17] Li T., Ma Y. 1983, ApJ 272, 317 [18] Lorenz E. et al. 1999, Towards a Major Atmospheric Cherenkov Detector - VI, pg 510, ed B.L. Dingus, M.H. Salamon, D.B. Kieda (AIP Conf. Series 515, New York, 2000) [19] Margon B. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 507 [20] Mirabel I.F. and Rodríguez L.F. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 409 [21] Rowell G.P. 2000 in Proc. Heidelberg Symposium on High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy, eds. F.A. Aharonian and H.J. Völk [22] Safi-Harb S. and Ögelman H. 1997, ApJ, 483, 868 [23] Safi-Harb S. and Petre R. 1999, ApJ, 512, 784 8