satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ).

Similar documents
LECTURE 22: INTEGRATION ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Orientations

x i x j x l ωk x j dx i dx j,

Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final

LECTURE 3: SMOOTH FUNCTIONS

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 1: FORMS ON R n

INTEGRATION ON MANIFOLDS and GAUSS-GREEN THEOREM

Lecture 13. Differential forms

The Algebra of Tensors; Tensors on a Vector Space Definition. Suppose V 1,,V k and W are vector spaces. A map. F : V 1 V k

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

LECTURE 3 Functional spaces on manifolds

Math 6455 Oct 10, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech. Integration on Manifolds, Volume, and Partitions of Unity

is the desired collar neighbourhood. Corollary Suppose M1 n, M 2 and f : N1 n 1 N2 n 1 is a diffeomorphism between some connected components

Let V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties:

Lecture Notes a posteriori for Math 201

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Survey on exterior algebra and differential forms

Solutions to Problem Set 5 for , Fall 2007

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

A Simple Proof of the Generalized Cauchy s Theorem

Integration and Manifolds

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Proposition 1 (Exterior Derivative of a 1-Form). For any smooth 1-form ω and smooth vector fields X and Y, (1) dω(x, Y )=X(ω(Y )) Y (ω(x)) ω([x, Y ]).

225A DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY FINAL

Topic: First Chern classes of Kähler manifolds Mitchell Faulk Last updated: April 23, 2016

STOKES THEOREM ON MANIFOLDS

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 3: TENSORS

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gm] 14 Mar 2007

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

KUIPER S THEOREM ON CONFORMALLY FLAT MANIFOLDS

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

Let X be a topological space. We want it to look locally like C. So we make the following definition.

Geometry Qualifying Exam Notes

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

Math 396. Orientations on bundles and manifolds

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

The Hodge Star Operator

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS On self-intersection of singularity sets of fold maps. Tatsuro SHIMIZU.

EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018

Metrics and Holonomy

Lagrangian submanifolds and generating functions

Lecture III: Neighbourhoods

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

Tangent bundles, vector fields

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY AND THE POINCARÉ-HOPF THEOREM

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND COHOMOLOGY

NOTES ON NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM XU WANG

LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY

Cohomology and Vector Bundles

Geometric control and dynamical systems

Notes on Spivak, Differential Geometry, vol 1.

Math 598 Feb 14, Geometry and Topology II Spring 2005, PSU

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

Symplectic critical surfaces in Kähler surfaces

The wave front set of a distribution

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Chapter 2. Bundles. 2.1 Vector bundles: definitions and examples

RIEMANN SURFACES. ω = ( f i (γ(t))γ i (t))dt.

NOTES ON FIBER BUNDLES

CHAPTER 3 SUBMANIFOLDS

Games on Manifolds. Noah Stein

Differential Forms. Introduction

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Review of Multi-Calculus (Study Guide for Spivak s CHAPTER ONE TO THREE)

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 1

Topological K-theory

Wave equation on manifolds and finite speed of propagation

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

LECTURE 9: THE WHITNEY EMBEDDING THEOREM

1 z. = 2 w =. As a result, 1 + u 2. 2u 2. 2u u 2 ) = u is smooth as well., ϕ 2 ([z 1 : z 2 ]) = z 1

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 1 PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS

Math 114: Course Summary

GEOMETRY MID-TERM CLAY SHONKWILER

Optimisation on Manifolds

Lecture Notes Topics in Differential Geometry MATH 542

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 5: DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY

1 k x k. d(x, y) =sup k. y k = max

The heat equation in time dependent domains with Neumann boundary conditions

4 Riemannian geometry

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003

A little taste of symplectic geometry

THE POINCARE-HOPF THEOREM

Transcription:

ensities Although differential forms are natural objects to integrate on manifolds, and are essential for use in Stoke s theorem, they have the disadvantage of requiring oriented manifolds in order for their integrals to be defined. There is a way to define integration on nonorientable manifolds as well, which we describe below. The reason an orientation is needed for integrals of differential forms to make sense has to do with transformation law under change of coordinates. The transformation law for an n-form on an n-manifold under a change of coordinates involves the jacobian determinant of the transition map, while the transformation law for integrals involves the absolute value of the determinant. We will define below objects whose transformation law for integrals involves the absolute value of the determinant. We begin, as always, in the linear-algebraic setting. efinition. Let V be an n-dimensional vector space. A density of V is a function µ : V V R }{{} n copies satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ). Observe that a density is not a tensor, because it is not linear over R in any of its arguments. Let Ω(V ) denote the set of all densities on V. Proposition 1 (Properties of ensities). Let V be a vector space of dim V = n 1. (a) Ω(V ) is a vector space under the obvious vector operations: (c 2 µ 1 + c 2 µ 2 )(X 1,,X n )=c 1 µ 1 (X 1,,X n )+c 2 µ 2 (X 1,,X n ). (b) If µ 1, µ 2 Ω(V ) and µ 1 (E 1,,E n )=µ 2 (E 1,,E n ) for some basis (E i ) of V, then µ 1 = µ 2. (c) If ω Λ n (V ), the map ω : V V R defined by ω (X 1,,X n )= ω(x 1,,X n ) is a density (d) Ω(V ) is a 1-dimensional spanned by ω for any nonzero ω Λ n (V ). Proof. (b) Suppose µ 1 and µ 2 give the sams value when applied to (E 1,,E n ). Typeset by AS-TEX 1

2 If X 1,,X n are arbitrary vectors in V, let T : V V be the unique linear map that takes E i to X i, for i =1,,n. It follows that (c) We have µ 1 (X 1,,X n )=µ 1 (TE 1,,TE n ) = det T µ 1 (E 1,,E n ) = det T µ 2 (E 1,,E n ) =µ 2 (TE 1,,TE n ) =µ 2 (X 1,,X n ). ω (TX 1,,TX n )= ω(tx 1,,TX n ) = (det T )ω(x 1,,X n ) = det T ω (X 1,,X n ). (d) Suppose ω is any nonzero element of Λ n (V ). It suffices to claim: µ Ω(V ), c R such that µ = c ω. Let (E i ) be a basis for V, and define a, b R by Since ω 0, we have a 0. Thus a = ω (E 1,,E n )= ω(e 1,,E n ), b =µ(e 1,,E n ). µ(e 1,,E n )=(b/a) ω (E 1,,E n ). Hence µ =(b/a) ω by part (b). efinition. (1) A positive density on V is a density µ with µ(x 1,,X n ) > 0 for all linearly independent (X 1,,X n ). (2) A negative density is defined similarly. Every density on V is either positive, negative or zero. The set of positive densities is a convex subset of Ω(V ), namely, a half-line. Now let be a smooth manifold. efinition. The set Ω = Ω(T p ) p is called the density bundle of. Let π :Ω be the projection map taking each element of Ω(T p ) to p.

Lemma 2. If is a smooth manifold, its density bundle is a smooth line bundle over. Proof. We will construct local trivilizations. Let (U, (x i )) be any smooth coordinate chart on, and let ω = dx 1 dx n. Proposition 1 shows that ω p is a basis for Ω(T p ) at each point p U. Therefore, the map Φ : π 1 (U) U R given by Φ(c ω p )=(p, c) is a bijecton. Suppose (Ũ,( xj )) is another smooth chart with U Ũ. Let ω = d x 1 d x n, and define Φ 1 :π (Ũ) Ũ R corresponding;y: Φ(c ω p )=(p, c). Then Φ Φ 1 (p, c) =Φ(c ω p )=Φ(c det( xj x i ) ωp ) ( ) x j ). =(p, c det x i ) Thus the transition functions are equal to det ( x j / x i. efinition. A section Ω is called a density on. A density on is said to be positive or negative if its value at each point has that property. Any nonvanishing n-form ω determines a positive density ω, defined by ω p = ω p for each p. If ω is a nonvanishing n-form on an open set U, then any density µ on U can be written µ = f ω for some real-valued function f. One important fact about densities is that every manifold admits a global smooth positive density, without any orientability assumptions. Lemma 3. If is a smooth manifold, there exists a smooth positive density on. Proof. Because the set pf positive elements of Ω is an open subset whose intersection with each fiber is convex, the usual partition of unity argument allows us to piece togeter local densities to obtain a global smooth positive density. Remark. This lemma works because positivity of a density is a well-defined property, independent of any choices of coordinates or orientations. There is no corresponding existence result for orientation forms because without a choice of orientations, there is no way to decide whether n-forms are positive. 3

4 Under smooth maps, densities pull back in the same way as differential forms. efinition. If F : N is a smooth map between n-manifolds and µ is a density on N, we define a density F µ on by (F µ) p (X 1,,X n )=µ F (p) (F X 1,,F X n ). Lemma 4. Let G : P N and F : N be smooth maps between n-manifolds, and let µ be a density on N. (a) For any f C (N), F (fµ)=(f F )F µ. (b) If ω is an n-form on N, then F ω = F ω. (c) If µ is smooth, then F µ is a smooth density on. (d) (F G) µ = G (F µ). The next result shows how to compute the pullback of a density in coordinates. Proposition 5. Suppose F : N is a smooth map between n-manifolds. If (x i ) and (y j ) are smooth coordinates on open sets U and V N, respectively, and u is a smooth real-valued function on V, then the following holds on U F 1 (V ): (1) F (u dy 1 dy n )=(u F ) det F dx 1 dx n, where F represents the matrix of partial derivatives of F in these coordinates. Proof. We have F (u dy 1 dy n )=(u F )F ( dy 1 dy n ) =(u F ) F (dy 1 dy n ), by Lemma 4(b), =(u F ) (det F)dx 1 dx n =(u F ) det F dx 1 dx n.

Integration of ensities If R n is a compact domain of integration and µ is a density on, we can write µ = f dx 1 dx n for some uniquely determined continuous function f : R. efinition. efine the integral of µ over by µ = fdv, or more suggestively, f dx 1 dx n = fdx 1 dx n. Similarly, if U is an open subset of R n and µ is compactly supported in U, we define µ = µ, U where U is any compact domain of integration containing the support of µ. The key fact is that this is diffeomorphism-invariant. Proposition 6. (1) If and E are compact domains of integration in R n, and G : E is a smooth map that restricts to a diffeomorphism from Int to Int E, then µ = G µ E for any density µ on E. (2) Similarly, if U, V R n are open sets and G : U V is a diffeomorphism, then µ = G µ for any compactly supported density µ on V. Proof. Use (1) in Proposition 5. V Now let be a smooth n-manifold. If µ is a density on whose support is contained in the domain of a single smooth chart (U, ϕ), the integral of µ over is defined as µ = (ϕ) 1 µ. This is extended to arbitrary densities µ by setting µ = ψ i µ, i where {ψ i } is a smooth partition of unity subordinate to an open cover of by smooth charts. This is independent of the choices of coordinates or partition of unity. U ϕ(u) 5

6 Proposition 7 (Properties of Integrals of ensities). Suppose and N are smooth manifolds with or without boundaries, and µ, ν are compactly supported densities on. (a) Linearity: If a, b R, then aµ + bη = a µ + b η. (b) Positivity: If µ is a positive density, then µ>0. (c) iffeomorphism Invariance: If F : N is a diffeomorphism, then µ = F µ. N The Riemannian ensity Lemma 8 (The Riemannian ensity). Let (,g) be a Riemannian manifold with or without boundary. There is a unique smooth positive density µ on, called the Riemannian density, with the property that (14) µ(e 1,,E n )=1 for any local orthonormal frame (E i ). Proof. (i) Uniqueness is obvious, because any two densities that agree on the elements of a basis must be equal. (ii) Existence: Given any point p, let U be a connected smooth coordinate neighborhood of p. Since U is diffeomorphic to an open subset of Euclidean space, it is orientable. Any choice of orientation of U uniquely determines a Riemannian volume form dv g with the property that dv g (E 1,,E n )=1 for any oriented orthonormal frame. If we put µ = dv g, it follows easily that µ is a smooth positive density on U satisfying (14). If U and V are two overlapping smooth coordinate neighborhoods, the two definitions of µ agree where they overlap by uniqueness, so this defines µ globally. Proposition. Let (,g) be a Riemannian manifold with or without boundary and let dv g be its Riemannian volume form. (a) The Riemannian density of ie equal to dv g. (b) For every compactly supported continuous function f : R, f dv g = fdv g. Because of part (b), it is customary to denote the Riemannian density simply by dv g, and to specify when necessary whether the notation refers to a density or a form.