AIAA Receptivity to Freestream Disturbances of a Mach 10 Nonequilibrium Reacting Oxygen Flow over A Flat Plate

Similar documents
AIAA NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF LEADING EDGE RECEPTIVITY OF STETSON'S MACH 8 BLUNT CONE STABILITY EXPERIMENTS. Xiaolin Zhong * and Yanbao Ma

Numerical Study of Hypersonic Receptivity with Thermochemical Non-Equilibrium on a Blunt Cone

Analysis of Shock Motion in STBLI Induced by a Compression Ramp Configuration Using DNS Data

Numerical Study of Hypersonic Receptivity with Thermochemical Non-Equilibrium on a Blunt Cone

An experimental and computational study of bouncing and deformation in droplet collision

Computation of Shock Waves in Inert Binary Gas Mixtures in Nonequilibrium Using the Generalized Boltzmann Equation

Cbmpu t ;ational Magnetohydfodytiamic Model of a Gasdynamic Mirror Propulsion System

46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference April 2005 Austin, Texas

Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations

Numerical Simulation of Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Instability in a Real Gas with Two-Dimensional Surface Roughness

Transient growth of a Mach 5.92 flat-plate boundary layer

UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

AIAA Xiaolin Zhong * RECEPTIVITY OF MACH 6 FLOW OVER A FLARED CONE TO FREESTREAM DISTURBANCE ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

THE calculation of aerodynamic heating rates on hypersonic

fluctuations based on the resolved mean flow

Real Gas and Surface Ablation Effects on Hypersonic Boundary Layer Instability over a Blunt Cone

Numerical Study of Boundary-Layer Receptivity on Blunt Compression-Cones in Mach-6 Flow with Localized Freestream Hot-Spot Perturbations

Feedback Control of Aerodynamic Flows

A Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method For Uncertainty Propagation in CFD Simulations

Multiscale Hydrodynamic Phenomena

Shock tunnel operation and correlation of boundary layer transition on a cone in hypervelocity flow

Jun 22-25, 2009/San Antonio, TX

Unconventional Thermal Propellant Gauging System

Nonlinear Transition Stages in Hypersonic Boundary Layers: Fundamental Physics, Transition Control and Receptivity

Orbital and Celestial Mechanics

Chapter 3. Mass Relations in Chemistry; Stoichiometry

A numerical method to simulate hypersonic boundary layers with finite-rate chemistry

Numerical simulation of the sound waves interaction with a supersonic boundary layer

Preliminary Study of the Turbulence Structure in Supersonic Boundary Layers using DNS Data

RECENT near-sonic and low-sonic boom transport aircraft

compression corner flows with high deflection angle, for example, the method cannot predict the location

Vibrational degrees of freedom in the Total Collision Energy DSMC chemistry model

Journal of Computational Physics 157, (2000) doi: /jcph , available online at

Modeling of Plasma Formation in Rarefied Hypersonic Entry Flows

29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference June 15 18, 1998 / Albuquerque, NM

Parallel Circuits. Chapter

Analytical Mechanics. of Space Systems. tfa AA. Hanspeter Schaub. College Station, Texas. University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado.

Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) Transition control of Mach 6.5 hypersonic flat plate boundary layer

A Jet Formation Criterion for Synthetic Jet Actuators

Modeling of Laser Supported Detonation Wave Structure Based on Measured Plasma Properties

New DNS Results of Shockwave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction

URANS Computations of Cavitating Flow around a 2-D Wedge by Compressible Two-Phase Flow Solver

FUNDAMENTALS OF GAS DYNAMICS

Heating effects on the structure of noise sources of high-speed jets

Experimental Investigation of Convoluted Contouring for Aircraft Afterbody Drag Reduction

AERODYNAMIC SHAPING OF PAYLOAD FAIRING FOR A LAUNCH VEHICLE Irish Angelin S* 1, Senthilkumar S 2

AIAA Development of Optical Components for Space-Based Solar Power System for ISRU and Regenerative Life Support

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 6-9 January 2003, Reno, Nevada Modeling shock unsteadiness in shock/turbulence interaction

Analysis of Modified Compressibility Corrections for Turbulence Models

Kinetic Energy Measurement of a 1kW Arcjet by Pitot Probe and Laser Absorption Spectroscopy

Design and Optimization of De Lavel Nozzle to Prevent Shock Induced Flow Separation

AIAA Numerical Simulation of Transient Hypersonic Flow with Real Gas Effects

Chapter 8. Thermochemistry

COMPRESSIBLE BOUNDARY LAYER HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENT USING EMBEDDED THERMOCOUPLES

AIAA Computational Analysis of a Pylon-Chevron Core Nozzle Interaction

AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION

DIRECT SIMULATION CALCULATIONS OF THE RAREFIED HYPERSONIC FLOW PAST A BACKWARD-FACING STEP

31th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit June 11 14, 2001/Anaheim, CA

38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit IO-13 January 2000 / Reno, NV

Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) Conservation relation of generalized growth rate in boundary layers

Hypersonic Blunt Body Thermophysics Using a Unified Kinetic/Continuum Solver

UNCERTAINTY MODELING VIA FREQUENCY DOMAIN MODEL VALIDATION

Large-eddy simulations of turbulent reacting stagnation point flows

AIAA Investigation of Reynolds Number Effects on a Generic Fighter Configuration in the National Transonic Facility (Invited)

A Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method for Uncertainty Propagation in CFD Simulations

Control of Shock-Wave / Boundary-Layer Interaction Using Volumetric Energy Deposition

Boundary Layer Stability Analysis for Stetson s Mach 6 Blunt Cone Experiments

Numerical studies of real-gas effects on two-dimensional hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET) HYPERSONIC SIMILITUDE FOR PLANAR WEDGES. Asha Crasta 1, S. A.

Numerical Investigation of Shock wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction over a 2D Compression Ramp

12. SHOCK WAVE PROPAGATION THROUGH NON- EQUILIBRIUM CLUSTER PLASMA

MEASUREMENT OF THE CROSS-COUPLING DERIVATIVES DUE TO PITCHING IN THE HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBER BLOWDOWN WIND TUNNEL

6-DOF simulation and the vulnerable area of the Air-to-Air missile to develop an End-game simulator

Introduction to Aircraft Flight. Mechanics

Dynamic Response of an Aircraft to Atmospheric Turbulence Cissy Thomas Civil Engineering Dept, M.G university

Active Flutter Control using an Adjoint Method

ASSESSMENT OF AEROTHERMAL HEATING AUGMENTATION ATTRIBUTED TO SURFACE CATALYSIS IN HIGH ENTHALPY SHOCK TUNNEL FLOWS

An Efficient Low Memory Implicit DG Algorithm for Time Dependent Problems

Overview of Boundary-Layer Transition Research at AEDC Tunnel 9

Coupled Fluid and Heat Flow Analysis Around NACA Aerofoil Profiles at Various Mach Numbers

EXPERIMENTS OF CLOSED-LOOP FLOW CONTROL FOR LAMINAR BOUNDARY LAYERS

STUDY ON THE IMPROVED KRIGING-BASED OPTIMIZATION DESIGN METHOD

THE ROLE OF LOCALIZED ROUGHNESS ON THE LAMINAR-TURBULENT TRANSITION ON THE OBLIQUE WING

General Geology - GEOL 1113 Section 005

THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON CHOKING PHENOMENA OF AXISYMMETRIC CONVERGENT NOZZLE FLOW

Laser Absorption Spectroscopy in Inductive Plasma Generator Flows

Section 4.1 Polynomial Functions and Models. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved

The Gamma Variate with Random Shape Parameter and Some Applications

SIMULATION OF GAS FLOW OVER MICRO-SCALE AIRFOILS USING A HYBRID CONTINUUM-PARTICLE APPROACH

THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTION PROCESSES FOR PROPULSION SYSTEMS

CFD Analysis of Micro-Ramps for Hypersonic Flows Mogrekar Ashish 1, a, Sivakumar, R. 2, b

Journal of Astronautics , ; 2. : (2007) Navier2Stokes, T = T w + ( T aw - T w ) guπu e rgu 2 ΠCp 1.

Thomas E. Schwartzentruber Assistant Professor

CFD ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC HEATING FOR HYFLEX HIGH ENTHALPY FLOW TESTS AND FLIGHT CONDITIONS

Theoretical and Computational Studies of Stability, Transition and Flow Control in High-Speed Flows. Principal Investigator: A.

Improvements to the Linear Standard Stability Prediction Program (SSP) Propulsion Conference and Exhibit July 2004 Fort Lauderdale, FL

APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME MAPPING ANALYSIS METHOD TO UNSTEADY NONLINEAR GUST-AIRFOIL INTERACTION PROBLEM

Exponential Box-Schemes for Boundary-Layer Flows with Blowing

AIAA Sensing Aircraft Effects by Flap Hinge Moment Measurement

Transcription:

42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 5-8 January 2004, Reno, Nevada AIAA 2004-256 AIAA 2004-0256 Receptivity to Freestream Disturbances of a Mach 0 Nonequilibrium Reacting Oxygen Flow over A Flat Plate Yanbao Ma and Xiaolin Zhong University of California, Los Angeles January 5 8, 2004 / Reno, NV For permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 80 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, Virginia 209-4344 Copyright 2004 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.

8.0 T / T 5.0 T (perfect gas) T (nonequilibrium flow) T v (nonequilibrium flow) 0.0 M 9.5 M 2 (perfect gas) M 2 (nonequilibrium flow) Shock position (perfect gas) Shock position (nonequilibrium flow) 0.2 0.0 2.0 9.0 0.08 6.0 9.0 0.06 3.0 8.5 0.04 0.02 0.0 0 40 80 20 60 y / L 8.0 0.00.0 2.4 u / u 0.9 0.8 p / p 2.2 2.0 0.7 0.6 0.5 Perfect gas Nonequilibrium flow.8.6 Perfect gas Nonequilibrium flow 0.4 0.3 0.2.4 0..2 0.0 0 40 80 20 60 y / L.0 T / T 8.0 6.0 p / p.8.6 Perfect gas Nonequilibrium flow 4.0 Perfect gas Nonequilibrium flow (T) Nonequilibrium flow (T v ).4 2.0.2 0.0.0 0 30 60 90 20 50 80 y / L

C o 0.08 0.06.2 a / u. mode I () (F = 5.0e-5) mode I (2) (F = 5.0e-5) Mack modes (F = 5.0e-5) mode I () (F = 3.98e-5) mode I (2) (F = 3.98e-5) Mack modes (F = 3.98e-5) + M 0.04 st mode 2nd mode 0.02 0.9 - M 0.00 0.8 0 0.05 0. ω 0.06 C o 0.00 α i 0.008 mode I () (F = 5.0e-5) mode I (2) (F = 5.0e-5) Mack modes (F = 5.0e-5) mode I () (F = 3.98e-5) mode I (2) (F = 3.98e-5) Mack modes (F = 3.98e-5) + M 0.04 0.006 0.004 0.02 0.002 - M 0.00 0 40 80 20 60 y / L 0.000 st mode 2nd mode -0.002 0 0.05 0. ω F 5.0E-4 4.0E-4 3.0E-4 F = 0.825e-4 F = 0.5e-4 4.0E-04 3.0E-04 n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5 2.0E-4 2.0E-04.0E-4.0E-04 0.0E0 0 500 000 500 2000 R

3.2E-03 6.0E-04 2.4E-03 n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0 4.5E-04 n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0.6e-03 3.0E-04 8.0E-04.5E-04.6E-03.2E-03 n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 2.8E-04 n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 2.E-04 8.0E-04.4E-04 4.0E-04 7.0E-05 2.0E-04.5E-04 n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5 a / u.2 LST (mode I ()) LST (Mack modes) Simulation (Mack modes) Simulation (mode I). + M.0E-04 st mode 5.0E-05 0.9 - M 0.8

a / u.2 LST (mode I ()) LST (mode I (2)) LST (Mack modes) Simulation (Mack modes) Simulation (mode I). + M 8.0E-04 6.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (θ = 0) Perfect gas ( j = ) Nonequilibrium flow ( j = ) Perfect gas ( j = 2 ) Nonequilibrium flow ( j = 2 ) 3.0E-03 2.0E-03 Slow acoustic waves (θ = 0) Perfect gas ( j = ) Nonequilibrium flow ( j = ) Perfect gas ( j = 2 ) Nonequilibrium flow ( j = 2 ) st mode 2nd mode 4.0E-04 0.9 - M 2.0E-04.0E-03 0.8 (a) (b).2 LST (mode I ()) LST (mode I (2)) LST (Mack modes) LST (mode II) Simulation (Mack modes) Simulation (mode I). a / u + M.2 a / u. Fast acoustic waves (θ = 0) LST (mode I ()) LST (mode I (2)) LST (Mack modes) DNS (perfect gas) DNS (nonequilibrium flow) + /M.2 a / u. Slow acoustic waves (θ = 0) LST (mode I ()) LST (mode I (2)) LST (Mack modes) DNS (perfect gas) DNS (nonequilibrium flow) + /M st mode 2nd mode st mode 2nd mode 2nd mode 0.9 - M 0.9 - /M 0.9 -/ M 0.8 (a) 0.8 (b) 0.8 2.0E-03 α i.0e-03 LST (n = 8) LST (n = 8) LST (n = 8) DNS (n = 8) DNS (n = 0) DNS (n = 5) 36.0 u u r (Simulation) 8.0 u i (Simulation) u r (2nd mode, LST) u i (2nd mode, LST) 0.0-8.0-36.0 0 30 60 90 y / L20 (a) 30.0 v v r (Simulation) 20.0 v i (Simulation) v r (2nd mode, LST) 0.0 v i (2nd mode, LST) 0.0-0.0 0 30 60 90 y / L20 (b).5 p.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 p r (Simulation) p i (Simulation) p r (2nd mode,lst) p i (2nd mode,lst) 8E3 T 4E3 0E0 T r (Simulation) T i (Simulation) T r (2nd mode,lst) T i (2nd mode, LST) -.0E-03 -.0 0 30 60 90 y / L20 (c) -4E3 0 30 60 90 y / L20 (d) -2.0E-03

7.5E-04 5.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (perfect gas) θ = 0 o θ = 22.5 o θ = 45 o θ = 67.5 o 7.5E-04 5.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) θ = 0 o θ = 22.5 o θ = 45 o θ = 67.5 o.6e-03.2e-03 8.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (pefect gas) n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5.6E-03.2E-03 8.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) 2.5E-04 0 0. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (a) 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 2.5E-04 0 0. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 (b) 4.0E-04 (a) 4.0E-04 n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5 (b).5e-03.0e-03 Slow acoustic waves (perfect gas) θ = 0 o θ = 22.5 o θ = 45 o θ = 67.5 o 2.4E-03.8E-03 Slow acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) θ = 0 o θ = 22.5 o θ = 45 o θ = 67.5 o.6e-03.2e-03 Fast acoustic waves (pefect gas) n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0.6e-03.2e-03 Fast acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0.2e-03 8.0E-04 8.0E-04 5.0E-04 6.0E-04 4.0E-04 4.0E-04 (a) 0 0. 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 (b) (c) (d) 5 Response coefficient (K s ) 0 5 Receptivity to slow acoustic waves Perfect gas Noequibrium flow 6.0E-04 4.5E-04 3.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (pefect gas) n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 6.0E-04 4.5E-04 3.0E-04 Fast acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5.5e-04.5e-04 0 0 22.5 45 67.5 90 θ (degree) (e) (f)

.5E-03 Slow acoustic waves (pefect gas).5e-03 Slow acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow).0e-03.0e-03 n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5 5.0E-04 n= n= 2 n= 3 n= 4 n= 5 (a) 5.0E-04 (b) 25 Receptivity to slow acoustic waves Pefect gas Noequilibrium flow 5.0E-03 4.0E-03 3.0E-03 2.0E-03 Slow acoustic waves (pefect gas) n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0 5.0E-03 4.0E-03 3.0E-03 2.0E-03 Slow acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) n= 6 n= 7 n= 8 n= 9 n=0 Response coefficient (K s ) 20 5 0.0E-03.0E-03 5 (c) (d) 0 00 50 200 250 f* (k Hz) 2.0E-03.5E-03 Slow acoustic waves (pefect gas) n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 2.0E-03.5E-03 Slow acoustic waves (nonequilibrium flow) n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5.0e-03.0e-03 5.0E-04 5.0E-04 (e) (f)