REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE GENERALIZED DRAZIN INVERSE IN A BANACH ALGEBRA (COMMUNICATED BY FUAD KITTANEH)

Similar documents
ELA ON THE GROUP INVERSE OF LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF TWO GROUP INVERTIBLE MATRICES

Formulae for the generalized Drazin inverse of a block matrix in terms of Banachiewicz Schur forms

THE EXPLICIT EXPRESSION OF THE DRAZIN INVERSE OF SUMS OF TWO MATRICES AND ITS APPLICATION

Moore Penrose inverses and commuting elements of C -algebras

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 27 Jul 2013

Representation for the generalized Drazin inverse of block matrices in Banach algebras

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 15 Jul 2013

Drazin Invertibility of Product and Difference of Idempotents in a Ring

Group inverse for the block matrix with two identical subblocks over skew fields

ADDITIVE RESULTS FOR THE GENERALIZED DRAZIN INVERSE

Nonsingularity and group invertibility of linear combinations of two k-potent matrices

On EP elements, normal elements and partial isometries in rings with involution

EP elements and Strongly Regular Rings

A Note on the Group Inverses of Block Matrices Over Rings

Representations for the Drazin Inverse of a Modified Matrix

Some results on the reverse order law in rings with involution

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 25 Jul 2013

Additive results for the generalized Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra

Weighted Drazin inverse of a modified matrix

Formulas for the Drazin Inverse of Matrices over Skew Fields

The Moore-Penrose inverse of differences and products of projectors in a ring with involution

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 21 Jul 2013

Perturbation of the generalized Drazin inverse

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 28 Jan 2016

EP elements in rings

The characterizations and representations for the generalized inverses with prescribed idempotents in Banach algebras

Operators with Compatible Ranges

Moore-Penrose-invertible normal and Hermitian elements in rings

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 7 Aug 2017

Some results on matrix partial orderings and reverse order law

Multiplicative Perturbation Bounds of the Group Inverse and Oblique Projection

Re-nnd solutions of the matrix equation AXB = C

DECOMPOSITION OF POLYNOMIALS AND APPROXIMATE ROOTS

GENERALIZED HIRANO INVERSES IN BANACH ALGEBRAS arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 30 Dec 2018

Dragan S. Djordjević. 1. Introduction

Linear Algebra and its Applications

The Expression for the Group Inverse of the Anti triangular Block Matrix

A FURTHER REFINEMENT OF MORDELL S BOUND ON EXPONENTIAL SUMS

Agmon Kolmogorov Inequalities on l 2 (Z d )

Lie symmetry and Mei conservation law of continuum system

Some additive results on Drazin inverse

Ronalda Benjamin. Definition A normed space X is complete if every Cauchy sequence in X converges in X.

The Drazin inverses of products and differences of orthogonal projections

Weighted generalized Drazin inverse in rings

NOTES ON THE DIVISIBILITY OF GCD AND LCM MATRICES

INVERSE PROBLEM OF A HYPERBOLIC EQUATION WITH AN INTEGRAL OVERDETERMINATION CONDITION

ELA

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M

Research Article On the Idempotent Solutions of a Kind of Operator Equations

Linear Algebra- Review And Beyond. Lecture 3

ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS

Partial isometries and EP elements in rings with involution

Factorization of weighted EP elements in C -algebras

FURTHER BOUNDS FOR THE ESTIMATION ERROR VARIANCE OF A CONTINUOUS STREAM WITH STATIONARY VARIOGRAM

Physics 251 Results for Matrix Exponentials Spring 2017

A Note on Exact Solutions to Linear Differential Equations by the Matrix Exponential

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 14 Apr 2018

Existence of equilibria in articulated bearings in presence of cavity

TOEPLITZ AND POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE COMPLETION PROBLEM FOR CYCLE GRAPH

Document downloaded from: This paper must be cited as:

IMFM Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Preprint series Vol. 50 (2012), 1173 ISSN

Inner image-kernel (p, q)-inverses in rings

Generalized B-Fredholm Banach algebra elements

Introduction to the Vlasov-Poisson system

Lecture 4 : General Logarithms and Exponentials. a x = e x ln a, a > 0.

Dragan S. Djordjević. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

Notes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, and the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk

Drazin invertibility of sum and product of closed linear operators

A new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition for Bernoulli percolation on Z d

Witt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 24 Aug 2016

Acute sets in Euclidean spaces

Interpolation of functional by integral continued C-fractions

Algebrability of the set of non-convergent Fourier series

A Weak First Digit Law for a Class of Sequences

SINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES

Abstract A nonlinear partial differential equation of the following form is considered:

GLOBAL SOLUTIONS FOR 2D COUPLED BURGERS-COMPLEX-GINZBURG-LANDAU EQUATIONS

Computing Exact Confidence Coefficients of Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions and their Functions

Least-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces

Workshop on Generalized Inverse and its Applications. Invited Speakers Program Abstract

SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, EULER S FORMULA. where L is some constant, usually called the Lipschitz constant. An example is

Stable Polynomials over Finite Fields

Representations of the (b, c)-inverses in Rings with Involution

Discrete Mathematics

Discrete Operators in Canonical Domains

WELL-POSEDNESS OF A POROUS MEDIUM FLOW WITH FRACTIONAL PRESSURE IN SOBOLEV SPACES

Some Weak p-hyponormal Classes of Weighted Composition Operators

Some vector algebra and the generalized chain rule Ross Bannister Data Assimilation Research Centre, University of Reading, UK Last updated 10/06/10

Arithmetic Distributions of Convergents Arising from Jacobi-Perron Algorithm

LATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION

CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold

The Moore-Penrose inverse of 2 2 matrices over a certain -regular ring

A revisit to a reverse-order law for generalized inverses of a matrix product and its variations

The DMP Inverse for Rectangular Matrices

Math 115 Section 018 Course Note

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 35 No , ON PYTHAGOREAN QUADRUPLES Edray Goins 1, Alain Togbé 2

GLOBAL DYNAMICS OF THE SYSTEM OF TWO EXPONENTIAL DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS

ON TAUBERIAN CONDITIONS FOR (C, 1) SUMMABILITY OF INTEGRALS

Robustness and Perturbations of Minimal Bases

Transcription:

Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis an Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, UL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 5 Issue 1 (2013), ages 53-64 EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE IN A BANACH ALGEBA (COMMUNICATED BY FUAD KITTANEH) J. BENÍTEZ 1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 Abstract. In this paper, we investigate aitive properties for the generalize Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra A. We give some representations for the generalize Drazin inverse of a + b, a an b are elements of A uner some new conitions, extening some known results. 1. Introuction The Drazin inverse has important applications in matrix theory an fiels such as statistics, probability, linear systems theory, ifferential an ifference equations, Markov chains, an control theory (1, 2, 11). In 9, Koliha extene the Drazin invertibility in the setting of Banach algebras with applications to boune linear operators on a Banach space. In this paper, Koliha was able to euce a formula for the generalize Drazin inverse of a+b when ab ba 0. The general question of how to express the generalize Drazin inverse of a+b as a function of a, b, an the generalize Drazin inverses of a an b without sie conitions, is very ifficult an remains open..e. Hartwig, G.. Wang, an Y. Wei stuie in 8 the Drazin inverse of a sum of two matrices A an B when AB 0. In the papers 3, 4, 5, 7, some new conitions uner which the generalize Drazin inverse of the sum a+b in a Banach algebra is explicitly expresse in terms of a, b, an the generalize Drazin inverses of a an b. In this paper we introuce some new conitions an we exten some known expressions for the generalize Drazin inverse of a+b, a an b are generalize Drazin invertible in a unital Banach algebra. Throughout this paper we will enote by A a unital Banach algebra with unity 1. Let A 1 an A qnil enote the sets of all invertible an quasinilpotent elements in A, respectively. Explicitly, A 1 {a A : x A : ax xa 1}, A qnil {a A : lim n + an 1/n 0}. 0 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 15A09, 46H05. Keywors an phrases. generalize Drazin inverse, Banach algebra. c 2012 Universiteti i rishtinës, rishtinë, Kosovë. Submitte Mar 25 2011. ublishe February 16, 2013. 53

54 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 If B is a subalgebra of the unital algebra A, for an element b B 1, we shall enote by b 1 B the inverse of b in B. Let us observe that in general B 1 A 1 (for example, if p A is a nontrivial iempotent an B is the subalgebra pap, then the unity of B is p, an therefore, p B 1 \ A 1 ). Let a A, if there exists b A such that bab b, ab ba, a(1 ab) is nilpotent, (1.1) thenbisthedrazin inverseofa, enotebya D anitisunique. Ifthelastconition in (1.1) is replace by a(1 ab) is quasinilpotent, then b is the generalize Drazin inverse, enote by a an is also unique. Eviently aa is an iempotent, an it is customary to enote a π 1 aa. We shall enote A {a A : a }. In particular, if a(1 ab) 0 then b is calle the group inverse ofa. It was provein 9, Lemma 2.4 that a exists if an only if an only if exists an iempotent q A such that aq qa, aq is quasinilpotent, an a+q is invertible. The following simple remark will be useful. emark 1.1. If the subalgebra B A has unity, then B 1 A an if b B 1, then b b 1 B. In fact, let e be the unity of B, since bb 1 B b 1 B b e, it is easy to see bb 1 B b b, b 1 B bb 1 B b 1 B, an b 1 B b bb 1 B. Following 4, we say that {p 1,p 2,...,p n } is a total system of iempotents in A if p 2 i p i for all i, p i p j 0 if i j, an p 1 + +p n 1. Given a total system of iempotents in A, we consier the set M n (A, ) consisting of all matrices A a ij n i,j1 with elements in A such that a ij p i Ap j for all i,j {1,...,n}. Let us recall that p i Ap i is a subalgebra of A with unity p i. In 4, Lemma 2.1 it was prove that φ : A M n (A, ) given by p 1 xp 1 p 1 xp 2 p 1 xp n p 2 xp 1 p 2 xp 2 p 2 xp n φ(x)...... p n xp 1 p n xp 2 p n xp n is an isometric algebra isomorphism. In the sequel, we shall ientify x φ(x) for x A. Another useful (although trivial) ientity is x n p i xp j x A. i,j1 If a A is generalize Drazin invertible, then we have the following matrix representations: a1 0 a, a 0 a a1 1 pap 0 0 0, a 2 0 0 π 0 1 p, (1.2) p aa, {p,1 p}, a 1 pap 1, an a 2 (1 p)a(1 p) qnil. Let us remark that if a has the above representation, then a a 1 1 pap a 1. The following lemmas are neee in what follows.

EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE 55 Lemma 1.1. Let {p,1 p} be a total system of iempotents in A an let a,b A have the following representation x 0 x t a, b. z y 0 y Then there exist (z n ) n0 (1 p)ap an (t n) n0 pa(1 p) such that a n x n 0 z n y n an b n x n t n 0 y n n N. The proof of this lemma is trivial by inuction an we will not give it. Lemma1.2. 4, Theorem3.3 Let b A, a A qnil, an let ab π a an b π ab 0. Then a+b A an (a+b) b + (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n. n0 The following Lemma is a generalization of Theorem 1 in 6. Although it was state for boune linear operators in a Banach space, its proof remains vali for Banach algebras. Lemma 1.3. Let a,b A such that ab ba. Then a + b A if an only if 1+a b A. In this case we have (a+b) a (1+a b)bb +b π ( b) n (a ) n+1 + (b ) n+1 ( a) n a π. n0 Lemma 1.4. 4, Example 4.5 Let a,b A be generalize Drazin invertible an ab 0, then a+b is generalize Drazin invertible an (a+b) b π b n (a ) n+1 + (b ) n+1 a n a π. n0 Lemma 1.5. 4, Theorem 2.3 Let x,y A, p an iempotent of A an let x an y have the representation a 0 b c x, y. (1.3) c b 0 a {p,1 p} {1 p,p} n0 n0 (i) If a pap an b (1 p)a(1 p), then x,y A an a x 0 b u b, y u 0 a {p,1 p} n0 {1 p,p} (1.4) u (b ) n+2 ca n a π + b π b n c(a ) n+2 b ca. (1.5) n0 (ii) If x A an a pap, then b (1 p)a(1 p), an x an y are given by (1.4) an (1.5). Lemma 1.6. 5, Lemma 2.1 Let a,b A qnil an let ab ba or ab 0, then a+b A qnil.

56 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 2. Main results In this section, for a,b A, we will investigate some formulas of (a + b) in terms of a, b, a, an b. Theorem2.1. Let a,b A be generalize Drazin invertible an satisfying b π a π ba 0, b π aa baa 0, ab π a. Then n0 (a+b) b +u+b π v, v a + (a ) n+2 b(a+b) n, u (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a+b) π b av. roof. Letp bb an {p,1 p}. Letaanbhavethefollowingrepresentation b1 0 a3 a b, a 1, (2.1) 0 b 2 a 4 a 2 b 1 is invertible in pap an b 2 is quasinilpotent in (1 p)a(1 p). Since ab π a an ab π a3 a 1 0 0, a 4 a 2 0 1 p we have a 3 a 4 0. Hence b1 0 b, a 0 b 2 0 a1 0 a 2 n0, a+b b1 a 1 0 a 2 +b 2. (2.2) By observing the representation of a given in (2.2) an a simple appealing of Lemma 1.5 yiel a 0 a1 (a 2) 2 0 a (2.3) 2 an p 0 0 a π 1 aa a1 0 a1 (a 2 )2 p a1 a 0 1 p 0 a 2 0 a 2 2 0 a π 2 p. (2.4) To explain better the southeast block of a π in the above relation, let us permit say that a π 2 is efine as 1 a 2 a 2, the element 1 p a 2 a 2 a π 2 p belongs to (1 p)a(1 p), but a π 2 oes not nee belong to (1 p)a(1 p). In fact, since a π 2 p (1 p)a(1 p), one has (aπ 2 p)p p(aπ 2 p) 0, or equivalently, a π 2p pa π 2 p. In view of the last representation in (2.2), we shall apply Lemma 1.5 to fin an expression of (a + b). To this en, we nee prove b 1 pap an a 2 + b 2 (1 p)a(1 p). The fact b 1 pap follows from b A an the representation of b in (2.2), in fact, we have b b 1 1 pap b 1. We shall stuy (a 2 +b 2 ) in the following lines. Let us represent a 2 an b 2 as follows: a 2 a11 0 0 a 22, b 2 b11 b 12 b 21 b 22, (2.5) q a 2 a 2 an {q,1 p q} (which is a total system of iempotents in the subalgebra (1 p)a(1 p)). Observe that since q (1 p)a(1 p) an 1 p is the unity of (1 p)a(1 p), then q(1 p) (1 p)q q, or equivalently,

EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE 57 qp pq 0. ecall that in the above representation of a 2 in (2.5), the element a 11 is invertible in qaq an a 22 is quasinilpotent. Since b π a π ba 0 an by (2.2), (2.4), we have 0 b π a π ba 0 0 0 1 p 0 0 0 (a π 2 p)b 2a 2 (a π 2 p)b 2a 2. p a1 a 2 0 a π 2 p b1 0 0 b 2 0 a1 0 a 2 But observe that b 2 (1 p)a(1 p), an thus, pb 2 0. Therefore, 0 a π 2 b 2a 2 hols. It seems that we can use (2.5) an 0 a π 2 b 2a 2 to get some information on b ij, but observe that we cannot represent a π 2 in the total system of iempotents since in general a π 2 / (1 p)a(1 p). To avoi this situation, let us efine {p,q,1 p q}, which in view of pq qp 0, it is trivial to see that is a total system of iempotents in A. Since a π 2 1 a 2a 2 1 q, 0 a π 2 b 2a 2 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 p q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 21 a 11 b 22 a 22. 0 0 0 0 b 11 b 12 0 b 21 b 22 0 0 0 0 a 11 0 0 0 a 22 Thus, b 21 a 11 0. Since a 11 is invertible in qaq an b 21 (1 p q)aq (this last assertion follows from the representation of b 2 given in (2.5)), we get Let us calculate b π aa baa. b π aa baa 0 0 0 a1 a 2 0 1 p 0 a 2 a 2 0 0 0 a 2 a 2 b 2a 2 a. 2 b 21 0. (2.6) b1 0 0 b 2 0 a1 a 2 0 a 2 a 2 Thus, b π aa baa a 2 a 2 b 2a 2 a 2 qb 2q; hence representation (2.5) entails b 11 0. Since (2.6) hols, then b 2 a π 2 0 0 0 0 0 b 12 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 12 b 2. 0 0 b 22 0 0 1 p q 0 0 b 22 Thus, the following conitions (i) a 2 A (ii) b 2 is quasinilpotent (iii) b 2 a π 2 b 2 (iv) a π 2b 2 a 2 0. are satisfie. Hence, we can apply Lemma 1.2 to get an expression of (b 2 + a 2 ) obtaining (a 2 +b 2 ) a 2 + (a 2) n+2 b 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) n. n0

58 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 By Lemma 1.5 applie to the representation of a+b given in (2.2) we obtain (a+b) b 1 u 0 (a 2 +b 2 ), (2.7) u (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π + b π 1b n 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n+2 b 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ). n0 n0 (2.8) ecall that b 1 b. Easily we have bb a a 1, bb b b 1, an b π b b 2. From (2.3) we get b π a a 2. By Lemma 1.1 an the representations of a+b an a given in (2.2) an (2.3), respectively, we have b π (a+b) k (a 2 +b 2 ) k, an b π (a ) k (a 2 )k for any positive integer k, Hence (a 2 +b 2 ) b π a + b π (a ) n+2 b π bb π (a+b) n. n0 This last expression can be simplifie by observing that b π bb π b π b an that by Lemma 1.1, there exists a sequence z n A such that (a ) n+2 b π 0 zn 0 0 0 zn 0 (a 2 )n+2 0 1 p 0 (a (a ) n+2. 2 )n+2 Therefore, (a 2 +b 2 ) b π (a + ) (a ) n+2 b(a+b) n. (2.9) n0 Now we will simplify the expression of u given in (2.8). Observe that for any n 0, one has n 0 (b 1) n+2 a 1 (b ) n+2 bb a (b ) n+2 a. (2.10) Moreover, by (2.2) we have (a+b) π 1 (a+b)(a+b) p 0 b1 a 1 b 1 u 0 1 p 0 a 2 +b 2 0 (a 2 +b 2 ) p b1 b 1 b 1 u a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 1 p (a 2 +b 2 )(a 2 +b 2 ) Thus, an by using Lemma 1.1 an (2.7), there exists a sequence (x n ) n1 in A such that b π (a+b) n (a+b) π 0 0 0 1 p b n 1 x n 0 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π p,. p b1 b 1 b 1 u a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 (a 2 +b 2 ) π p but recall that a 2 + b 2 (1 p)a(1 p), an thus, if n > 0, then (a 2 + b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π p (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π. Thus n > 0 b π (a+b) n (a+b) π (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π. (2.11) Now we can prove that (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a+b) π (2.12)

EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE 59 hols for any n N. Since, as is easy to see, ab π a, then we have for any n > 0 that (2.10) an (2.11) lea to (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π (b ) n+2 ab π (a+b) n (a+b) π (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a+b) π. Now, we will prove that (2.12) hols for n 0: (b ) 2 a(a+b) π (b 1 ) 2 0 0 a1 p b1 b 1 b 1 u a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 0 0 a 2 0 (a 2 +b 2 ) π p 0 (b 1 ) 2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) π p (b 0 0 1 )2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) π p. But observe that a 1 pa(1 p), an hence a 1 p 0. Thus, we have prove (b ) 2 a(a+b) π (b 1) 2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) π. An thus, (2.12) hols for any n N. Now, we aregoing to simplify the expression n0 bπ 1b n 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n+2 appearing in (2.8). ecall that b π 1 bπ an a 1 bb a were obatine. Observe that if n > 0, then b π 1 bn 1 bπ b n 1 (1 p)bn 1 0 since b 1 pap. Furthermore, b π 1 a 1 b π bb a 0. Thus b π 1 bn 1 a 1(a 2 +b 2 ) n+2 0. (2.13) n0 From (2.9), b 1 b, a 1 bb a, an ab π a we get b 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) ) ( ) b bb ab (a π + (a ) n+2 b(a+b) n b a a + (a ) n+2 b(a+b) (2.14) n. n0 n0 Now, (2.7), (2.8), (2.9), (2.12), (2.13), an (2.14) prove the theorem. emark 2.1. If b is group invertible, then the conition b π a π ba 0 implies b π aa baa 0. In fact, since bb π 0, then b π aa baa b π (1 a π )baa b π a π baa 0. emark 2.2. Theorem 2.1 extens Lemma 1.2. If b is quasinilpotent, then b 0 an b π 1. Notice that ba π b clearly implies aa baa 0. Theorem 2.2. Let a,b A be generalize Drazin invertible. Assume that b π ab b π ba an ab π a. Then (a+b) b + +b π ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n + (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a+b) π b a ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n. n0 n0 roof. As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, if we set p bb an by using ab π a, then the representations given in (2.2) are vali, {p,1 p}, b 1 is invertible in pap an b 2 is quasinilpotent. Since 0 0 0 b π a1 b1 0 0 0 ab, 0 1 p 0 a 2 0 b 2 0 a 2 b 2 b π ba 0 0 0 1 p b1 0 0 b 2 0 a1 0 a 2 n0 0 0 0 b 2 a 2,

60 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 anb π ab b π ba,thena 2 b 2 b 2 a 2. Lemma1.3guaranteesthatb 2 +a 2 isgeneralize Drazin invertible if an only if 1+b 2a 2 is generalize Drazin invertible; but observe that b 2 is quasinilpotent, an therefore b 2 0. So, b 2 + a 2 is generalize Drazin invertible. Also, b π 2 1 b 2b 2 1 an Lemma 1.3 lea to (b 2 +a 2 ) (a 2) n+1 ( b 2 ) n. n0 By (2.3) an Lemma 1.1, there exist a sequence (x n ) n1 in pa(1 p) such that (a ) n x n +(a 2) n for any n N, thus b π (a ) n+1 b n 0 0 0 xn b n 1 0 0 1 p 0 (a 2) n+1 0 b n 2 0 0 0 (a 2 )n+1 b n (a 2) n+1 b n 2. 2 Thus, (a 2 +b 2 ) b π ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n. (2.15) By employing Lemma 1.5 for the representation of a+b given in (2.2) we get n0 n0 (a+b) b 1 +(b 2 +a 2 ) +u, (2.16) u (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π + b π 1b n 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n+2 b 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ). n0 As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we have that (2.12) an b π 1 bn 1 a 1 0 for any n 0 hol. Furthermore, since a 1 bb a an ab π a, then b 1 a 1(a 2 +b 2 ) b bb ab π ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n b a ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n. Therefore, n0 n0 u (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a+b) π b a ( 1) n (a ) n+1 b n. (2.17) n0 n0 Expressions (2.15), (2.16), an (2.17) permit finish the proof. Theorem 2.3. Let a, b A be generalize Drazin invertible. Assume that they satisfy aba 0 an ab 2 0. Then a+b A a π (a+b) A b π a π (a+b) A a π b π (a+b) A. Furthermore, if b π ab 0 or b π ba 0, or b π ab b π ba, then a+b A an (a+b) b +v +b π a +u+b π (a ) 2 b+ua b, v u b π a π b π (a+ba π ) n bb π (a ) n+2, n0 (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n 1 s(a+b) b aa, n0 s b π a +u+b π (a ) 2 b+ua b.

EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE 61 roof. Since ab 2 0, then a an b have the matrix representation given in (2.2). Now, we use 0 aba. 0 a1 b1 0 0 a1 0 a1 b aba 2 a 2. 0 a 2 0 b 2 0 a 2 0 a 2 b 2 a 2 Thus a 1 b 2 a 2 a 2 b 2 a 2 0. Let q a 2 a 2 an {q,1 p q} (a total system of iempotents in the algebra (1 p)a(1 p)). We represent a11 0 b11 b a 2, b 0 a 2 12, (2.18) 22 b 21 b 22 a 11 is invertible in the subalgebra qaq an a 22 is quasinilpotent. We use a 2 b 2 a 2 0 a11 0 b11 b a 2 b 2 a 2 12 a11 0 a11 b 11 a 11 a 11 b 12 a 22 0 a 22 b 21 b 22 0 a 22 a 22 b 21 a 11 a 22 b 22 a 22 Thus, 0 a 11 b 11 a 11 an 0 a 11 b 12 a 22. The invertibility of a 11 in the subalgebra qaq an b 11 qaq ensure b 11 0. In a similar way we have b 12 a 22 0. Using ab 2 0 leas to a 2 b 2 2 0. Hence a 11 b 12 b 21 0 an a 11 b 12 b 22 0. The invertibility of a 11 (in qaq) leas to b 12 b 21 0 an b 12 b 22 0. Now let us efine 0 b12 a11 0 x an y (2.19) 0 0 b 21 a 22 +b 22 From (2.18) an b 11 0 one trivially gets a 2 + b 2 x + y. From b 12 b 21 0, b 12 a 22 0, an b 12 b 22 0 we have xy 0. Let us prove a+b A a 22 +b 22 (1 p q)a(1 p q). (2.20) : Assume that a+b A, then by the representations given in (2.2) we have that a 2 +b 2 (1 p)a(1 p), i.e., a 2 +b 2 x+y (1 p)a(1 p). We can apply Lemma 1.4 to y x+(x+y) because x A (since ( x) 2 0) an x(x+y) 0 obtaining y A. Lemma 1.5 an the representation of y in (2.19) ensure that a 22 +b 22 is generalize Drazin invertible. : Assume in this paragraph that a 22 + b 22 is generalize Drazin invertible. By recalling that a 11 is invertible in the subalgebra qaq, the representation of y in (2.19) leas to y (1 p)a(1 p). Since x 2 0, xy 0, an x + y a 2 +b 2, Lemma 1.4 yiels a 2 +b 2 (1 p)a(1 p). Now, Lemma 1.5 an the representation of a+b in (2.2) ensure that a+b A. Our next goal is to express the right sie of the equivalence (2.20) in terms of a an b. To this en, let us efine {p,q,1 q p}, which is easy to see that it is a total system of iempotents in A. First we notice that a π 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 p q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 p q)a 21 a 22 +b 22 0 0 0 0 a 11 +b 11 b 12 0 b 21 a 22 +b 22, (2.21) which, in view of Lemma 1.5, ensures that a 22 +b 22 is generalize Drazin invertible if an only if a π 2(a 2 +b 2 ) is generalize Drazin invertible. Now, we shall use (2.4),.

62 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 b 1 pap, a 1 pa(1 p), an a 2,b 2 (1 p)a(1 p), a π p a1 a (a+b) 2 b1 a 1 b1 a 0 a π 2 p 1 a 1 a 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 a 2 +b 2 0 a π 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) b π a π 0 0 b1 a (a+b) 1 a 1 a 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 0 0 1 p 0 a π 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 a π 2(a 2 +b 2 ) an a π b π (a+b) an appealing to Lemma 1.5, leas to p a1 a 2 0 0 0 a π 2 p 0 1 p 0 a1 a 2 (a 2 +b 2 ) 0 a π, 2(a 2 +b 2 ) b1 a 1 0 a 2 +b 2 a π 2(a 2 +b 2 ) A a π (a+b) A b π a π (a+b) A a π b π (a+b) A. We shall prove the secon part of the Theorem. Since b π 0 0 0 a1 b1 0 0 0 ab 0 1 p 0 a 2 0 b 2 0 a 2 b 2 an then b π ba 0 0 0 1 p b1 0 0 b 2 0 a1 0 a 2 0 0 0 b 2 a 2 a 2 b 2 b 2 a 2, b π ab 0 or b π ba 0 or b π ab b π ba a 2 b 2 0 or b 2 a 2 0 or a 2 b 2 b 2 a 2. The representations given in (2.18) lea to a 2 b 2 0 or b 2 a 2 0 or a 2 b 2 b 2 a 2 a 22 b 22 0 or b 22 a 22 0 or a 22 b 22 b 22 a 22. Since a 22 an b 22 are quasinilpotent, then the above implications an Lemma 1.6 lea to b π ab 0 or b π ba 0 or b π ab b π ba a 22 +b 22 is quasinilpotent. Inparticular, byemployingequivalence(2.20) wegetthat a+b A. Furthermore, by using Lemma 1.4, x 2 0, an xy 0, one gets (a 2 +b 2 ) (x+y) y π y n (x ) n+1 + (y ) n+1 x n x π y +(y ) 2 x. n0 From (2.19) an Lemma 1.5 we get y a 11 0 u (a 22 +b 22 ) So (y ) 2 x a 11 0 u 0 u n0 a 11 0 u 0, (a 22 +b 22 ) n b 21 (a 11 )n+2. (2.22) n0 a 11 0 u 0 0 b12 0 0, 0 (a 11 ) 2 b 12 0 ua. (2.23) 11b 12,

EESENTATIONS FO THE GENEALIZED DAZIN INVESE 63 In view of (2.2) an (2.18) it is simple to obtain b π a a 2 a 11 an bπ (a ) 2 (a 2) 2 (a 11) 2. We have a+ba π 0 a1 b1 0 p a1 a + 2 b1 a 0 a 2 0 b 2 0 a π 2 p 1 b 1 a 1 a 2 0 a 2 +b 2 a π. 2 By Lemma 1.1, there exists a sequence (w n ) n0 in A such that (a+ba π ) n b n 1 w n 0 (a 2 +b 2 a π 2) n an thus, b π (a+ba π ) n (a 2 +b 2 a π 2 )n. But another appealing to Lemma 1.1 an some computations as in (2.21) lea to (1 p q)(a 2 + b 2 a π 2 )n (a 22 + b 22 ) n. Observe that (2.4) yiels b π a π a π 2 p 1 q p. Thus b π a π b π (a + ba π ) n (a 22 +b 22 ) n. In view of (2.18) an b 11 0 we get b 21 b 2 q. But, it is simple to prove b π aa a 2 a 2 q an b 2 bb π. Hence b 21 bb π b π aa bb π aa. Moreover, (a 11) k (a 2) k b π (a ) k hols for any k N in view of Lemma 1.1. If we take into account that a b π a hols, then (2.22) becomes u b π a π b π (a+ba π ) n bb π a(a ) n+3 b π a π b π (a+ba π ) n bb π (a ) n+2. (2.24) n0 From b 11 0, (2.18), an a b π a we have b 12 qb 2 b π aa b π b b π aa b. This observation allows us to simplify the entries of (y ) 2 x given in (2.23): an Therefore, ua 11 b 12 n0 (a 11 )2 b 12 b π (a ) 2 b π aa b b π (a ) 2 b b b π a π b π (a+ba π ) n bb π (a ) n+2 π a b π aa b ua b. n0 (a 2 +b 2 ) y +(y ) 2 x a 11 +u+(a 11 )2 b 12 +ua 11 b 12 b π a +u+b π (a ) 2 b+ua b. (2.25) By Lemma 1.5, (a+b) b 1 v 0 (a 2 +b 2 ), (2.26) v (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n a π 2 + b π 1b n 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n+2 b 1a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ). n0 n0 Since b 1 b, a 1 bb a, (a 2 + b 2 ) n b π (a + b) n, a 2,b 2 (1 p)a(1 p), a π 2 p+b π a π, ab π a, a b π a an ub π u (this last equality is obtaine from (2.24)) we have an (a 2 +b 2 ) π 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) (a 2 +b 2 ) 1 (b π a +u+b π (a ) 2 b+ua b)b π (a+b) 1 (b π a +u+b π (a ) 2 b+ua b)(a+b) (b 1) n+2 a 1 (a 2 +b 2 ) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π (b ) n+2 bb ab π (a+b) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n (a 2 +b 2 ) π.

64 J. BENÍTEZ1, X LIU 2 AND Y. IN 2 Asiseasytosee,b π 1 bn 1 0foranyn 1. Moreover,bπ 1 a 1 b π (bb a) b π (1 b π )a 0, an b 1a 1 a 2 (b )(bb a)(b π a ) b aa. Thus, v reuces to v (b ) n+2 a(a+b) n 1 s(a+b) b aa, (2.27) n0 s b π a + u + b π (a ) 2 b + ua b. Expressions (2.25) (2.27) allow finish the proof. Acknowlegements The first author was supporte by Spanish roject MTM2010-18539. eferences 1 Ben-Israel, A. an Greville T.N.E.: Generalize Inverses: Theory an Applications, Wiley- Interscience New York, 1974, secon e. Springer, New York, 2002. 2 Campbell S.L. an Meyer C.D.: Generalize Inverses of Linear Transformations, itman, Lonon, 1979. 3 Castro González N.: Aitive perturbation results for the Drazin inverse, Linear Algebra Appl. Vol.397, (2005) 279-297. 4 Castro González N an Koliha J.J.: New aitive results for the g-drazin inverse, roceeings of the oyal Society of Einburgh: Section A Mathematics, Vol.134, (2004) 1085-1097. 5 Cvetković-Ilić D.S., Djorjević D.S. an Wei Y.: Aitive results for the generalize Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra, Linear Algebra Appl. Vol.418, (2006) 53-61. 6 Deng C. an Wei Y.: New aitive results for the generalize Drazin inverse, Math. Anal. Appl. Vol.370, (2010) 313-321. 7 Djorjević D.S. an Wei Y.: Aitive results for the generalize Drazin inverse, J. Aust. Math. Soc. Vol.73, (2002) 115-126. 8 Hartwig.E., Wang G.. an Wei Y.: Some aitive results on Drazin inverse, Linear Algebra Appl. Vol.322, (2001) 207-217. 9 Koliha J.J.: A generalize Drazin inverse, Glasg. Math. J. Vol.38, (1996) 367-381. 10 Martínez-Serrano M.F. an Castro-González N.: On the Drazin inverse of blocks matrices an generalize schur complement, App. Math. Comp. Vol.215, (2009) 2733-2740. 11 Yang H. an Liu X.: The Drazin inverse of the sum of two matrices an its applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math. Vol.235, (2011), 1412-1417. 1 Departamentoe MatemáticaAplicaa, Universia olitécnica e Valencia, Camino e Vera s/n. 46022, Valencia, España. E-mail aress: jbenitez@mat.upv.es 2 College of Mathematics an Computer Science, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning 530006,.. China. E-mail aress: xiaojiliu72@yahoo.com.cn, yonghui1676@163.com