Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Similar documents
Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update


GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Flooding Performance Indicator Summary. Performance indicator: Flooding impacts on riparian property for Lake Ontario and the Upper St.

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho

APR-SEP. Forecast Are in KAF % Average 10 % 30 Year. Forecast Period

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer

NRC Workshop Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment (PFHA) Jan 29-31, Mel Schaefer Ph.D. P.E. MGS Engineering Consultants, Inc.

Operator and Modeler Collaboration on Truckee- Carson River Operations Using Ensembles River Ware User Group Meeting Thursday February 1, 2018

Updated 2018 Restoration Allocation & Default Flow Schedule February 16, 2018

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For April 2014

Updated 2018 Restoration Allocation & Default Flow Schedule May 22, 2018

Albeni Falls Operations Meeting 2015

APPENDIX J MODELING TEHCNICAL MEMORANDUM (RESSIM MODELING)

Preliminary Viability Assessment (PVA) for Lake Mendocino Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO)

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For March 2016

Typical Hydrologic Period Report (Final)

Appendix E Plots from the Evaluation of the CNRFC Operational Hydrologic Model

Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin

Lake Winnebago Regulation Meeting

Cost of Inflow Forecast Uncertainty for Day Ahead Hydropower Production Scheduling

Water Management for Environmental Restoration Flows In the Big Bend reach, Rio Grande Rio Bravo

Incorporating Large-Scale Climate Information in Water Resources Decision Making

QPF? So it s a Land-falling Atmospheric River, Can That Help the Forecaster Make a Better. David W. Reynolds

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 1, 2019

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Reclamation Perspective on Operational Snow Data and Needs. Snowpack Monitoring for Streamflow Forecasting and Drought Planning August 11, 2015


National Integrated Drought Information System. Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin 20-March-2012

Great Lakes Update. Great Lakes Winter and Spring Summary January June Vol. 187 Great Lakes Update August 2012

Development and Testing of Alternate Forecast-Based Flood Operations Rules for West Point Lake

2011 Flood: Technical Review of Lake Manitoba, Lake St. Martin and Assiniboine River Water Levels Summary

January 25, Summary

RESERVOIR RELEASE FORECAST MODEL FOR FLOOD OPERATION OF THE FOLSOM PROJECT INCLUDING PRE-RELEASES ABSTRACT

Kootenai Basin Water Supply Update and Sturgeon Flow Augmentation Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative

Souris River Basin Spring Runoff Outlook As of March 15, 2018

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

Restoration Goals TFG Meeting. Agenda

AN OVERVIEW OF ENSEMBLE STREAMFLOW PREDICTION STUDIES IN KOREA

Unconventional Wisdom and the Effects of Dams on Downstream Coarse Sediment Supply. Byron Amerson, Jay Stallman, John Wooster, and Derek Booth

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

USA National Weather Service Community Hydrologic Prediction System

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

National Integrated Drought Information System Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin. 22 May 2012

Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse

Upper Missouri River Basin February 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast February 6, 2018

Mid-term Operations Probabilistic Model of the Colorado River Basin

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Missouri River Basin Climate Outlook 1 May Dr. Dennis Todey State Climatologist South Dakota State Univ.

MISSOURI RIVER BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT SPRING 2019 PUBLIC MEETINGS

2017 Fall Conditions Report

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

Background and Purpose of Meeting. River Towers Meeting. Flood Risk Management Study Alternatives Overview

Upper Missouri River Basin January 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast January 3, 2018

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. November 17, 2017 Rick Thoman National Weather Service Alaska Region

Three main areas of work:

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

MINNESOTA POWER ST LOUIS RIVER PROJECT FERC 2360 ISLAND LAKE RESERVOIR TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING SUMMARY

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

Climate Change and Flood Operations in the Sacramento Basin, California

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

Stochastic Modeling of Extreme Floods on the American River at Folsom Dam

Hydrologic Forecast Centre Manitoba Infrastructure, Winnipeg, Manitoba. FEBRUARY OUTLOOK REPORT FOR MANITOBA February 23, 2018

Applications/Users for Improved S2S Forecasts

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

Numerical modeling of sediment flushing from Lewis and Clark Lake

CHAPTER 2 SOLUTIONS. Given: 333 houses; AWWA household average demand. a. The AWWA average household water use is 1,320 L/d

2016 Fall Conditions Report

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Transcription:

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam Public Workshop May 28, 2015 Library Galleria 828 I Street, Sacramento, CA US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS 2 05/20/15 CB

PURPOSE OF MANUAL UPDATE Revise operation rules for Folsom Dam to reduce flood risk based on the capabilities of the Folsom Joint Federal Project (JFP). Reflect operational capabilities created by improved weather forecasts. Potentially reduce the volume of flood control reservation in Folsom Reservoir at any particular time by comparison to the operations that have been in effect since 95 3 05/20/15 CB

OBJECTIVES OF MANUAL UPDATE Pass the Probable Maximum Flood while maintaining 3 feet of freeboard below the top of dam to stay within the dam safety constraints of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Control a 1/100 annual chance flow ( 100-year flood ) to a maximum release of 115,000 cubic feet per second as criteria set by the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency to support Federal Emergency Management Agency levee accreditation along the American River. Control a 1/200 annual chance flow ( 200-year flood ) as defined by criteria set by the State of California (State) Department of Water Resources to a maximum release of 160,000 cubic feet per second, when taking into account all the authorized modifications within the American River Watershed. 4 05/20/15 CB

TODAY S DISCUSSION Fall Reservoir Drawdown Operations Proposed New Spring Refill Storage Boundary Efforts to Develop & Assess Forecast-Based Alternative Project Milestone Schedule 5 05/20/15 CB

FALL RESERVIOR DRAWDOWN OPERATIONS 6

Fall Drawdown Folsom Lake Water Years 2011 and 2012 30k 10k

WATER CONTROL DIAGRAM REFRESHER 1,000 Flood space (KAF) 0 800 Storage (KAF) 600 Flood space 400 Top of conservation Storage 400 Variable space 600 200 Conservation pool Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 8

WATER CONTROL DIAGRAM 1,000 800 Storage (KAF) 600 Flood Space (KAF) 0 400 Existing (USACE) 400 KAF Flood Space + Basin Wetness Existing (BOR-SAFCA) 400/670 KAF Flood Space + Upstream Storage Credit Alternative 1 400/600 KAF Flood Space + Upstream Storage Credit Alternatives 2, 3a, 3b 400/600 KAF flood space 400 200 600 670 Alternatives 2, 3a, 3b 400/600 KAF flood space Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 9

10 PRELIMINARY

FORECAST ALTERNATIVE Preliminary results How it works Assessment 11

100-YR, 1986 PATTERN, EXISTING AND ALTERNATIVES PRELIMINARY 12

200-YR, 1986 PATTERN, EXISTING AND ALTERNATIVES PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY 13

FORECASTING ALTERNATIVE n-day volumes 62 members n-day volumes probabilistic mean, sd 3A n-day adjusted volumes 3B 14

COMPUTE INFLOW VOLUMES FROM FORECAST ENSEMBLES 1-day 2-day 3-day 4-day 5-day 15

HINDCAST VS INFLOW (3-DAY) 16 Observed refers to model-computed inflows as opposed to hindcast inflows.

HINDCAST VS INFLOW (3-DAY) 17 Observed refers to model-computed inflows as opposed to hindcast inflows.

DRAWDOWN CURVE Defines top of conservation (TOC) based on forecasted inflow volume. Simulations Drawdown curve Gross pool Starting Storage TOC 400 TAF 600 TAF Time Forecasted Inflow Volume Success = do not encroach into surcharge AND peak release <= 115K cfs 18

DRAWDOWN CURVES Target Starting Storage (TOC) Gross pool 400 TAF 600 TAF N-day duration Forecasted Inflow Volume 19

20

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC Now 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 400 TAF 600 TAF Days 21

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now 400 TAF 600 TAF Days 22

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 400 TAF 600 TAF Days 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now 23

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 400 TAF 600 TAF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now Days 24

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now 400 TAF 600 TAF Days 25

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 400 TAF 600 TAF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now Days 26

FORECAST-BASED TOC Forecasted Inflow Volume Days Forecastbased TOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Now 400 TAF 600 TAF Days 27

FORECAST-BASED OPERATION Precip / inflow FB TOC Storage START Forecastbased flood operation END 28

FORECAST-BASED RELEASES Forecast duration (days) PRELIMINARY Forecast volume threshold (ac-ft) Maximum Release (cfs) 5 < 300,000 8,000 5 300,000 25,000 3 300,000 50,000 2 300,000 80,000 1 300,000 115,000 29

FORECAST-BASED RELEASES PRELIMINARY 30

1986 PATTERN 25-YR PRELIMINARY 31

1986 PATTERN 100-YR PRELIMINARY 32

1986 PATTERN 200-YR PRELIMINARY 33

1986 PATTERN 100-YR STARTING STORAGE SENSITIVITY PRELIMINARY 34

TENTATIVE ASSESSMENT A forecast-based operations plan appears viable at Folsom Dam. Early results indicate clear benefits over other plans Supportive response from USACE Headquarters Potential significant adverse impacts not apparent Performance trade-offs Frequency of flood operations not yet determined Address potential for not refilling 35

NEXT STEPS Refine based on hindcast-based simulation results and operational considerations Adjust release triggers, magnitudes and rules to avoid impacts, balance trade-offs, and reasonably optimize performance Robust testing under historic and hypothetical hydrologic and operational conditions Additional USACE policy and technical review 36

QUESTIONS? 37

PROJECT MILESTONE SCHEDULE SEPTEMBER 2015 HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2016 HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO: PRESENT AND DISCUSS TENTATIVELY RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE FEBRUARY - JULY 2016 USACE PERFORMS FINAL REVIEW USACE COMPLETES DRAFT NEPA / CEQA DOCUMENTS 38

DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS OCT 2017 39