Kinetics of the High Temperature Oxygen Exchange Reaction on 238 PuO 2 Powder

Similar documents
Modeling the Substoichiometric Behavior of 238 PuO 2 and 241 AmO 2 in the Low Oxygen Potential Envrionments Found in Radioisotope Power Systems

Chem 75 Winter, 2017 Practice Exam 3

Observation of size-independent effects in nanoparticle retention behavior during asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation

Ultrasound-assisted Reductive Dissolution of CeO 2 and PuO 2 in the Presence of Ti Particles

Chemistry Online Quiz: Review Semester 1. Use Google Forms to provide answers online to the following questions.

DIFFUSION IN SOLIDS. IE-114 Materials Science and General Chemistry Lecture-5

Chem 12 Exam 3. Basic Skills Section. 1. What is the chemical formula for aluminum nitrate?

WYSE Academic Challenge State Finals Chemistry 2005 SOLUTION SET

The City School. Subject: Chemistry CIE Code: Curriculum Distribution Chart

Supplementary Information

Quiz 5 October 21, 2014

State one advantage and one disadvantage of using chlorine in water treatment. advantage: disadvantage: [2]

1. My answers for this Chemistry 102 exam should be graded with the answer sheet associated with: a) Form A b) Form B c) Form C d) Form D e) Form E

Unit 1 Lab Equipment. Chemistry Midterm Review

AOAC Official Method 2016.xx. Determination of Total Sulfur in Fertilizers by High Temperature Combustion

Development of an Improved Sodium Titanate for the Pretreatment of Nuclear Waste at the Savannah River Site

Chemistry. Essential Standards Chemistry

YEAR 10- Chemistry Term 1 plan

Date: SCH 4U Name: ENTHALPY CHANGES

Precipitation. Size! Shape! Size distribution! Agglomeration!

Supplementary Information

Lesson 6 - Earth and the Moon

Skills/Activities Resources Assessments

S = k log W 11/8/2016 CHEM Thermodynamics. Change in Entropy, S. Entropy, S. Entropy, S S = S 2 -S 1. Entropy is the measure of dispersal.

Chapter Practice Test Grosser

The reaction whose rate constant we are to find is the forward reaction in the following equilibrium. NH + 4 (aq) + OH (aq) K b.

SOME ELEMENTS AND ISOTOPES OF SPECIAL CONCERN IN FUEL CYCLE C SEPARATIONS S Tc: ( 99 Tc) U: ( 3 U, 33 U, 34 U, Np: ( 37 Np) Pu: ( 38 Pu, 39 Pu, Am: (

CHEM 101A EXAM 1 SOLUTIONS TO VERSION 1

Chemical Separations of Pu- 238 from Irradiated Neptunium Targets

Table S1. Structural parameters of shell-by-shell fitting of the EXAFS spectrum for reduced and oxidized samples at room temperature (RT)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Sample. Test Booklet. Subject: SC, Grade: HS MCAS 2007 HS Chemistry. - signup at to remove - Student name:

Kinetic Transport Models and Minimum Detection Limits of Atmospheric Particulate Resuspension

Unit 08 Review: The KMT and Gas Laws

Radioactivity is the spontaneous disintegration of nuclei. The first radioactive. elements discovered were the heavy atoms thorium and uranium.

Redox Chemistry of Neptunium in Solutions of Nitric Acid

mcdonald (pam78654) HW 4B: Gases and Kinetics laude (89560) 1

1. Which atomic symbol represents an isotope of sulfur with 17 neutrons?

Name AP Chemistry September 30, 2013

Semester 2 Final Exam Review. Semester 2 Final Exam Review. South Pasadena Chemistry. Period Date / /

CHEM Thermodynamics. Entropy, S

Quantitative chemistry Atomic structure Periodicity

Contact Person(s) : Anna Berne APPLICATION

Lower Sixth Chemistry. Sample Entrance Examination

VALIDATION OF A UPLC METHOD FOR A BENZOCAINE, BUTAMBEN, AND TETRACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE TOPICAL SOLUTION

8. The table below describes two different reactions in which Reaction 1 is faster. What accounts for this observation? Reaction 1 Reaction 2.

Imperfections (Defects)

9 Nuclear decay Answers to exam practice questions

TABLE OF CONTENT. Chapter 4 Multiple Reaction Systems 61 Parallel Reactions 61 Quantitative Treatment of Product Distribution 63 Series Reactions 65

Practice Questions for Exam 2 CH 1020 Spring 2017

The Cubic Perovskite Structure of Black. Formamidinium Lead Iodide, α-[hc(nh 2 ) 2 ]PbI 3,

Removal of Uranium from Plutonium Solutions by Anion Exchange

Study Tips. Thermodynamics

Calorimetric studies on urania thoria solid solutions

M = Molarity = mol solute L solution. PV = nrt % yield = actual yield x 100 theoretical yield. PM=dRT where d=density, M=molar mass

Changing the Dopant Concentration. Diffusion Doping Ion Implantation

Name. Chem 116 Sample Examination #2

Strategic use of CuAlO 2 as a sustained release catalyst for production of hydrogen from methanol steam reforming

How fast or slow will a reaction be? How can the reaction rate may be changed?

Chem. 1A Final Practice Test 1

8th GRADE PHYSICAL SCIENCE: 2nd SEMESTER EXAM OUTLINE

Toluene total oxidation over CuO-CeO 2 /Al 2 O 3 catalyst: nature and role of oxygen species

Chemical Reactions and Kinetics of the Carbon Monoxide Coupling in the Presence of Hydrogen

Speed Distribution at CONSTANT Temperature is given by the Maxwell Boltzmann Speed Distribution

Ch 10 Practice Problems

How fast reactants turn into products. Usually measured in Molarity per second units. Kinetics

Reaction Rate. Products form rapidly. Products form over a long period of time. Precipitation reaction or explosion

ETCHING Chapter 10. Mask. Photoresist

Part 5- Chemistry Paper 1 Atomic Structure Knowledge Questions

Disruption mitigation in ITER

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

Chemistry 431 Practice Final Exam Fall Hours

Supporting information High density monodispersed cobalt nanoparticles filled into multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Chapter 14 Chemical Kinetics

Complex equilibria and calculations of formation constants from potentiometric data

Astro 210 Lecture 16 October 1, 2010

EXPERIMENT 4. Le Chatelier s Principle INTRODUCTION

Similarities and differences:

Size-selected Metal Cluster Deposition on Oxide Surfaces: Impact Dynamics and Supported Cluster Chemistry

Q1) State a condition under which a bimolecular reaction is kinetically first order?

RADIOACTIVITY. Nature of Radioactive Emissions

AP CHEMISTRY 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

Chemistry 2 nd Semester Final Exam Review

Model (C) King Abdul Aziz University Faculty of science Chemistry department. Chem.110 Final exam of 1 st term H Time: 120minutes

Supplementary Material for Molecular Ordering of Organic Molten Salts Triggered by Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

CHAPTER 17 REVIEW. Reaction Kinetics. Answer the following questions in the space provided. Energy B A. Course of reaction

Section EXAM III Total Points = 150. November 15, Each student is responsible for following directions. Read this page carefully.

Third Quarter Cumulative Review Questions. 1. Which factor distinguishes a metallic bond from an ionic bond or a covalent bond?

MOF-76: From Luminescent Probe to Highly Efficient U VI Sorption Material

(a) (i) State the proton number and the nucleon number of X.

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 REACTIVITY EFFECTS DUE TO TEMPERATURE CHANGES

Part A Answer all questions in this part.

Ethers in a Porous Metal-Organic Framework

PHYSICS OF THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT

THE RATE EQUATION. might have a rate equation like this r = k [A] [B] 2

Unit 2 Words to Know

College of Mechanical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou , China; 2

SUPeR Chemistry CH 222 Practice Exam

Regents review Atomic & periodic

Kinetics - Chapter 14. reactions are reactions that will happen - but we can t tell how fast. - the steps by which a reaction takes place.

Transcription:

Kinetics of the High Temperature Oxygen Exchange Reaction on 238 PuO 2 Powder C. E. Whiting, M. Du, L. K. Felker, R. M. Wham, C. D. Barklay, and D. P. Kramer University of Dayton Research Institute (937) 229-2570 Chris.Whiting@udri.udayton.edu NETS 2015 Conference Albuquerque, NM 2/23/2015 University of Dayton Research Institute Shaping the technology of tomorrow

Why is PuO 2 Important? 238 Pu 0.54 W T per g Heat is produced by the high energy α decay of 238 Pu

(α,n) Creates Detrimental Radiation 238 234 Pu U 4 α 21 18 Ne O 1 n Worker Dose Impact on scientific equipment

Isotopic Oxygen Exchange ~ 20,000 n / s*g 2,600 n / s*g

CeO 2 as a Surrogate for PuO 2 Same crystallographic space grouping - FF3 m; #222 Similar solid state chemistry Similar oxygen behavior

Rate Independent of Several Parameters At 1000 o C Oxygen Exchange on CeO 2 was Independent of All Parameters Studied Parameter Tested Low High Isotopic Effects 16 O 18 O Sample Size (mg) 5 100 O 2 Partial Pressure (torr) 116 806 Total Pressure (torr) 417 1918 SSA (m 2 * g -1 ) 4.23 72.91 Binary Gas Composition He, Ne, Ar, and N 2 Not a Reaction at the Material Surface C.E. Whiting, et al., J. Solid State Chem., 2014, 218, 116-123

Exchange is Governed by 3 Different Mechanisms -4 ln k -5-6 -7-8 E a = 114 kj / mol Surface Exchange X -325 mesh 70 100 nm 70 100 nm with thermal treatment -9 0.0005 0.0008 0.0011 0.0014 1/T (K -1 ) Literature reports E a ~120 kj / mol for the surface exchange mechanism C.E. Whiting, et al., Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 18-23

Exchange is Governed by 3 Different Mechanisms -4 ln k -5-6 -7-8 E a = 29.1 kj / mol Surface Mobility E a = 31.2 kj / mol Surface Mobility X -325 mesh 70 100 nm 70 100 nm with thermal treatment -9 0.0005 0.0008 0.0011 0.0014 1/T (K -1 ) No previous studies of surface mobility on CeO 2 in the literature C.E. Whiting, et al., Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 18-23

Exchange is Governed by 3 Different Mechanisms -4 ln k -5-6 -7-8 E a = 11.0 kj / mol Internal Chemical Reaction X -325 mesh 70 100 nm 70 100 nm with thermal treatment -9 0.0005 0.0008 0.0011 0.0014 1/T (K -1 ) No previous studies of this novel internal chemical reaction in the literature C.E. Whiting, et al., Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 18-23

Exchange is Governed by 3 Different Mechanisms -4 ln k -5-6 -7-8 E a = 11.0 kj / mol Internal Chemical Reaction X -325 mesh 70 100 nm 70 100 nm with thermal treatment -9 0.0005 0.0008 0.0011 0.0014 1/T (K -1 ) Internal Chemical Reaction Fast Independent of particle surface area Independent of gas phase composition C.E. Whiting, et al., Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 18-23

Temperature Decreases Specific Surface Area -4 ln k -5-6 -7-8 Surface Mobility Faster Surface Mobility Slower X -325 mesh 70 100 nm 70 100 nm with thermal treatment -9 0.0005 0.0008 0.0011 0.0014 1/T (K -1 ) 1000 o C Treatment 70 100 nm m 2 /g -325 mesh m 2 /g None 26.94 4.23 2 h 8.90 2.17 8 h 4.28 1.88 C.E. Whiting, et al., Solid State Ionics, 2015, 272, 18-2323 Experiment can cause dynamic change in SSA Results would appear erratic

Designing Exchange Experiments for 238 PuO 2 Surrogate Experiments Tell Us to Expect: 3 different exchange mechanisms - Internal chemical reaction (Fastest) - Surface mobility - Surface exchange (Slowest) Internal chemical reaction is independent of SSA Exposure to high temperature will reduce SSA - Surface mobility and exchange are slower after thermal exposure - Thermal treatment at high temperature can stabilize surface and prevent confusing results

238 PuO 2 Exchange Apparatus A fresh batch of 238 PuO 2 was synthesized 238 PuO 2 exchange apparatus similar to CeO 2 apparatus Rate monitored via neutron detector

Design of Experiments Perform 2 exchanges at 700 o C - Get rate information before significant thermal exposure Perform 4 exchanges at 1000 o C - Obtain replicates to estimate precision - Mechanism should be the internal chemical reaction Perform 2 exchanges each at 950, 900, 850, and 800 o C - Obtain activation energy information - Attempt to see changes in mechanism Perform 2 exchanges at 700 o C - Observe effect of thermal exposure on rate

238 PuO 2 Exchange Results -5.5-5.9 Internal Chemical Reaction E a = 17.9 + 0.9 kj / mol -6.3 ln k -6.7-7.1-7.5 0.0007 0.0008 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 1/T (K -1 ) Initial 700 o C rate controlled by internal chemical reaction Independent of SSA replicates at 1000 o C were reproducible E a in same ballpark as CeO 2 (11.0 kj / mol )

238 PuO 2 Exchange Results -5.5-5.9 ln k -6.3-6.7 Surface Mobility E a = 35.3 + 2.3 kj / mol -7.1-7.5 0.0007 0.0008 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 1/T (K -1 ) Significant change in rate and E a Reduction in SSA appears to have occurred at 1000 o C E a in same ballpark as CeO 2 (29.1 kj / mol )

238 PuO 2 Exchange Results -5.5-5.9-6.3 ln k -6.7-7.1-7.5 0.0007 0.0008 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 1/T (K -1 ) Surface Exchange or mix of Surface Mobility and Exchange Significant change in rate compared to pre-1000 o C Reduction in SSA appears to have occurred at 1000 o C Not enough data to extract surface exchange E a

238 PuO 2 Exchange Results -5.5-5.9-6.3 ln k -6.7-7.1-7.5 0.0007 0.0008 0.0009 0.001 0.0011 1/T (K -1 ) Surface Exchange or mix of Surface Mobility and Exchange Thanks to surrogate studies, verified the very complex behavior of PuO 2 oxygen exchange using only 16 experiments.

Previous Exchange Data on 238 PuO 2 Exchange T ( o C) Sintering T ( o C) PuO 2 Data Oxalate k x10-3 (s -1 ) Hydroxide k x10-3 (s -1 ) Data published by Deaton and Wiedenheft in 1972 1550 1550 32.9 1300 1300 25.4 1000 1000 11.8 1000 1550 13.9 700 700 10.6 1550 1550 8.62 1550 1550 10.1 1550 1550 9.62 1550 1550 13.6 * 1300 1300 ~1 hour 1550 1300 >1 hour 1000 1000 >1 hour 700 700 ~2 hours Only previously published data on PuO 2 oxygen exchange Observed exchange behavior was very complex Unable to obtain E a or mechanism information due to complexities Comparison with our data shows strong similarities Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Previous Exchange Data on 238 PuO 2 Exchange T ( o C) Sintering T ( o C) PuO 2 Data Oxalate k x10-3 (s -1 ) Hydroxide k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 32.9 1300 1300 25.4 1000 1000 11.8 1000 1550 13.9 700 700 10.6 1550 1550 8.62 1550 1550 10.1 1550 1550 9.62 1550 1550 13.6 * 1300 1300 ~1 hour 1550 1300 >1 hour 1000 1000 >1 hour 700 700 ~2 hours Rates appear to be similar Different sintering temperatures produced different SSA SSA independent rate suggests internal chemical reaction Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Previous Exchange Data on 238 PuO 2 Exchange T ( o C) Sintering T ( o C) PuO 2 Data Oxalate k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 32.9 1300 1300 25.4 1000 1000 11.8 1000 1550 13.9 700 700 10.6 Hydroxide k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 8.62 1550 1550 10.1 1550 1550 9.62 1550 1550 13.6 * 1300 1300 ~1 hour 1550 1300 >1 hour 1000 1000 >1 hour 700 700 ~2 hours ln k -3-4 -5 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 0.0012 1/T (K -1 ) Since a single mechanism was identified, E a can be calculated E a = 20.6 + 5.5 kj / mol Statistically similar to E a obtained from our PuO 2 studies (17.9 kj / mol ) Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Previous Exchange Data on 238 PuO 2 Exchange T ( o C) Sintering T ( o C) PuO 2 Data Oxalate k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 32.9 1300 1300 25.4 1000 1000 11.8 1000 1550 13.9 700 700 10.6 Hydroxide k x10-3 (s -1 ) Hydroxide precipitation produced much larger particles (lower SSA) Rate appears similar between replicate runs 1550 1550 8.62 1550 1550 10.1 1550 1550 9.62 1550 1550 13.6 * 1300 1300 ~1 hour 1550 1300 >1 hour 1000 1000 >1 hour 700 700 ~2 hours Hydroxide fines (higher SSA) produced a faster rate Dependence on SSA suggests surface mobility mechanism Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Previous Exchange Data on 238 PuO 2 Exchange T ( o C) Sintering T ( o C) PuO 2 Data Oxalate k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 32.9 1300 1300 25.4 1000 1000 11.8 1000 1550 13.9 700 700 10.6 Hydroxide k x10-3 (s -1 ) 1550 1550 8.62 1550 1550 10.1 1550 1550 9.62 1550 1550 13.6 * 1300 1300 ~1 hour 1550 1300 >1 hour 1000 1000 >1 hour 700 700 ~2 hours ~16 minutes to complete reaction at 1550 o C Significantly slower rate > 1300 o C suggests shift towards surface exchange Rate observed to be influenced by 2 different mechanisms Similar results observed on CeO 2 Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Competing Surface Mobility and Exchange Surface Exchange 0-3 Surface Mobility 800 o C CeO 2 Surface Exchange ln F -6 Surface Mobility -9 0 1750 3500 5250 7000 Time (s) Surface mobility and exchange are competitive at some temperatures Hydroxide precipitated PuO 2 produces exchange behavior similar to CeO 2 Deaton, R. L., Wiedenheft, C. J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34, 3419-3425 (1972)

Low Temperature Initial Phase Sintering 4 Hour Thermal Treatment of CeO 2 1000 o C 800 o C 600 o C 500 o C At 400 o C no change in SSA after 8 weeks Reduction in SSA is most likely due to initial phase sintering - Grains and particles begin to grow and consolidate at a slow rate - Particles will become more spherical (reduce SSA) - Normally begins at ~half the melting point (~1200 o C)

Conclusions PuO 2 exhibits exchange behavior very similar to CeO 2 - All 3 mechanisms are observed - Internal chemical reaction is fast and independent of SSA - Surface mobility and exchange are observed as T and SSA decrease - CeO 2 is a good surrogate for PuO 2 exchange Historical results are replicated and clarified Activation energies for PuO 2 are similar but larger Exchange temperature can reduce SSA of PuO 2 - Low temperature initial phase sintering

Acknowledgements DOE Contract #: DE-NE0000422 Doug McClelland and Dr. Robert Ellefson, Mound Technical Solutions, Inc. John Douglas and Emily Kaufman (Students) Mound Museum Library and Archives

238 PuO 2 Synthesis Conditions Plutonium (75 % as 238 Pu) oxalate was precipitated from a 1.3 g/l solution of plutonium nitrate with ~25-fold excess of solid oxalic acid. The solution was agitated and allowed to settle over the course of a week. After filtration of the solid plutonium oxalate, an additional ~12-fold excess of solid oxalic acid was then added to improve the plutonium recovery. This solution was agitated and allowed to settle over the weekend.

238 PuO 2 Synthesis Conditions Calcination of the plutonium oxalate was performed at 700 o C for 90 min with a ramp rate of 20 o C/min. A calculated final sample mass of 234.0 mg PuO 2 (154.7 mg 238 Pu) was then transferred to the quartz sample vessel; calculations were based on the Pu concentrations in the nitrate solution before and after precipitation. All experiments were performed on this sample of PuO 2.

Lattice-Interstitial Space Transition Lattice oxygen ions are labile Shift from lattice position to interstitial space is easy Lattice oxygen ions diffuse along oxygen vacancies Shifting to interstitial space creates new channels for ion motion New channels allow diffusing oxygen to exchange with new parts of the lattice Speed that oxygen travels along these channels (i.e. conductivity) is unrelated Modeling suggests that for this shift E a ~0.1 ev or ~10 kj / mol

Standard Testing Parameters 20 mg of CeO 2 placed in an Al 2 O 3 boat (1 µg sensitivity) - CeO 2 nominal particle size: 70-100 nm and -325 mesh Temp set with control thermocouple (Type K) Gases phase: ~760 torr He, ~260 torr 18 O 2, ~780 torr He - 18 O 2 99.80% purity manually mixed with He - 18 O 2 99.80% purity premixed 1:5 premixed with N 2 Bleed gas into vacuum chamber RGA monitored m/z: 4, 7, 18, 28, 32, 34, 36, and 44 - Measurements taken every 5 s

Where Diffusion Takes Over Rate of exchange based on diffusion is proportional to so as grain radius increases diffusion slows down 1 r 2 M M t = 6 1 e r 1 2 2 π n= 1 n 2 2 2 Dn π t Time necessary to reach 99.9% completion 3.76 µm grain radius = 617 s (i.e. same as chemical reaction) 1.19 µm grain radius = 61.7 s 11.9 µm grain radius = 6170 s Diffusion plays a role in rate when grain radius nears 1-10 µm

Evidence of Diffusion in Large Grains 0-2 ln F -4-6 -8-10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Time (s) 10 µm Spex milled pellets with mean grain radius = 2.8 µm Early diffusion will be fast and rate mostly dominated by polaron hopping As time increases, diffusion will become slower and rate plot will curve k = 7.64 x10-3 s -1 ; Time to completion = 1300 s

Diffusion Through a Thick Sample Bed 0-2 -4 ln F -6-8 -10-12 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Time (s) Diffusion slows down over time A thick sample bed clearly causes a reduction in the exchange rate Total processing time ~50 min (10 mm thick bed)

Deriving the Base Rate Law O Exchange is occurring constantly, but an exchange is only observed when the isotopes are different vs. Forward Reverse Rate f = k*p 18-16 = k* 18 Rate χ (g) * 16 = χ k*( 16 (s) χ Rate r = k*p 16-18 = k* 16 χ (g) * 18 (s),init 16 χ (g),init ) * F χ (s) Fraction of reaction remaining; F M t = 1 M

Exchange Mechanism R1 Monatomic Exchange R2 Diatomic Exchange Homomolecular Exchange

Diatomic and Homomolecular Exchange 0.30 Total 16 O 700 o C 0.30 Total 16 O 800 o C 16 O (mmol) 0.20 0.10 16 O 2 16 O 18 O 16 O (mmol) 0.20 0.10 16 O 2 16 O 18 O 0.00 0 1000 2000 Time (s) 0.00 0 1000 2000 Time (s) Equilibrium Homomolecular Exchange 900 and 1000 o C experiments do not show any 16 O 2 Fast enough to reach equilibrium before detection

Previous CeO 2 Exchange Results 600 o C 18 O 2 pulses < 1 s residence Primarily Diatomic Exchange Most likely diatomic exchange with limited homomolecular exchange Homomolecular exchange limited by small residence time Bueno-López, A., et al., Catal. Today, 121, 237-245 (2007)

Backexchange With 16 O % Backexchange 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Assume self-heating to 400 o C Backexchange in air Dt/r 2 0.0020 0.0015 0.0010 0.0005 0% 0 10000 20000 30000 Time (s) 0.0000 0 10000 20000 30000 Time (s) ~1.09% backexchange per hour Dt/r 2 curved from 0-5,000 s (surface reaction) Dt/r 2 linear from 5,000-30,000 s (lattice diffusion)

Backexchange With 16 O Assume self-heating to 400 o C % Backexchange 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Backexchange in 37 torr 18 O 2-0.05-0.06 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Time (s) Time (s) ln F 0.00-0.01-0.02-0.03-0.04 ~0.7% backexchange per hour over first 7 hours ln F plot curved from 0-5,000 s (equilibration) ln F plot linear from 5,000-25,000 s (surface reaction)

Backexchange of Sintered CeO 2 Pellets Signal Intensity (I.U. x10-10 ) 4 3 2 1 0 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 Time (s) No signal after 11 hours LOD ~0.02% backexchange Assume self-heating to 400 o C Backexchange in air 96% Theoretical Density Sintered Pellets

Atmosphere Control and Testing Apparatus

Chemical Reaction vs. Diffusion Reduced Diffusion Equation * 20 mg of 70 100 nm particles M M t = 6 Dt 2 πr 1 2 20 nm Signal Intensity (AU) 6.E-07 4.E-07 2.E-07 0.E+00 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (s) Dt/r 2 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 Not linear 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (s) Intercept 0 * Deaton, R.L. and Wiedenheft, C.D., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 35, 649 (1973)

First Order Rate Plots First Order in F Rate = k * F ln F 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 -12 1 2 3 4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time (s) Total O Intensity (A.U.) 5.0E-06 4.8E-06 4.6E-06 4.4E-06 4.2E-06 4.0E-06 Matches Reincorporation Region 1 of O 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Time (s) Low Temp High Pressure High Temp Low Pressure

First Order Rate Plots First Order in F Rate = k * F Signal (x10-7 A.U.) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (s) ln F 1.0-1.0-3.0-5.0-7.0-9.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (s) k Time to Completion

Oxygen Exchange Mechanism Rate limited by a chemical reaction NOT occurring at the surface of the material O 2(g) O 2(ads) O 2 - (ads) O 2 2- (ads) 2 O - (ads) 2 O - (lattice) Oxygen exchange theory says that the entire exchange process occurs at the surface of the material Must not be observing part of the exchange reaction proper Probably describing isotopic redistribution through the lattice