Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) and Response Spectrum

Similar documents
2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

Dynamics of Structures

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

Introduction to structural dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Introduction to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Chapter a. Spring constant, k : The change in the force per unit length change of the spring. b. Coefficient of subgrade reaction, k:

CE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A

Numerical Solution of Equation of Motion


SHAKING TABLE DEMONSTRATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BASE-ISOLATED BUILDINGS ***** Instructor Manual *****

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS BASICS:

Giacomo Boffi. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Ambientale e Territoriale Politecnico di Milano

The student will experimentally determine the parameters to represent the behavior of a damped oscillatory system of one degree of freedom.

CHAPTER 7 EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE OF INELASTIC SYSTEMS. Base shear force in a linearly elastic system due to ground excitation is Vb

Introduction to Vibration. Professor Mike Brennan

Dynamics of structures

Chap. 15: Simple Harmonic Motion

EQ Ground Motions. Strong Ground Motion and Concept of Response Spectrum. March Sudhir K Jain, IIT Gandhinagar. Low Amplitude Vibrations

Chapter 5 Design. D. J. Inman 1/51 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech

Stochastic Structural Dynamics Prof. Dr. C. S. Manohar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

LANMARK UNIVERSITY OMU-ARAN, KWARA STATE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSE: MECHANICS OF MACHINE (MCE 322). LECTURER: ENGR.

Secondary Response Spectra

3. MDOF Systems: Modal Spectral Analysis

TOPIC E: OSCILLATIONS SPRING 2019

Address for Correspondence

Lecture 11. Scott Pauls 1 4/20/07. Dartmouth College. Math 23, Spring Scott Pauls. Last class. Today s material. Next class

T1 T e c h n i c a l S e c t i o n

PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZING THE SEISMIC DEMAND FOR EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE SCENARIO EVALUATION

Modeling and Experimentation: Mass-Spring-Damper System Dynamics

Input-Output Peak Picking Modal Identification & Output only Modal Identification and Damage Detection of Structures using

MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF DYNAMIC VIBRATION ABSORBER-RESPONSE PREDICTION AND REDUCTION

Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Analysis

Introduction to Vibration. Mike Brennan UNESP, Ilha Solteira São Paulo Brazil

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings

SHOCK RESPONSE OF MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEMS Revision F By Tom Irvine May 24, 2010

ME 328 Machine Design Vibration handout (vibrations is not covered in text)

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

Free Vibration of Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) Systems

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Design Spectra. Reading Assignment Course Information Lecture Notes Pp Kramer Appendix B7 Kramer

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

OPTIMAL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF FRICTION ENERGY DISSIPATING DEVICES

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

Examining the Adequacy of the Spectral Intensity Index for Running Safety Assessment of Railway Vehicles during Earthquakes

MODELLING DAMAGE AND PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF FRAMES USING A GAUSSIAN SPRINGS BASED APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD

Chapter 13. Simple Harmonic Motion

Software Verification

MATH 251 Week 6 Not collected, however you are encouraged to approach all problems to prepare for exam

Simulating Two-Dimensional Stick-Slip Motion of a Rigid Body using a New Friction Model

Chapter 15. Oscillations

BASIC STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS

Introduction to Mechanical Vibration

Undamped Free Vibrations (Simple Harmonic Motion; SHM also called Simple Harmonic Oscillator)

CE 6701 Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao

Structural Dynamics Lecture 2. Outline of Lecture 2. Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.)

DEVELOPMENT OF A REAL-TIME HYBRID EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM USING A SHAKING TABLE

ASEISMIC DESIGN OF TALL STRUCTURES USING VARIABLE FREQUENCY PENDULUM OSCILLATOR

2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes

The Effect of Using Hysteresis Models (Bilinear and Modified Clough) on Seismic Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Systems

Prob. 1 SDOF Structure subjected to Ground Shaking

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM STRUCTURAL FUSE SYSTEMS

Aseismic design of structure equipment systems using variable frequency pendulum isolator

18.12 FORCED-DAMPED VIBRATIONS

Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction

This equation of motion may be solved either by differential equation method or by graphical method as discussed below:

Translational Mechanical Systems

Tuning TMDs to Fix Floors in MDOF Shear Buildings

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Outline of parts 1 and 2

Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations

Harmonic Oscillator. Mass-Spring Oscillator Resonance The Pendulum. Physics 109 Experiment Number 12

Chapter 12 Vibrations and Waves Simple Harmonic Motion page

A new seismic testing method E. Kausel Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts 7-277, OamWd^e, ^ 027 JP,

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Computational and Applied Sciences (IJETCAS)

EQUIVALENT SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM AND FREE VIBRATION

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Software Verification

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 7 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURES

Laboratory notes. Torsional Vibration Absorber

ME scope Application Note 28

11. Some applications of second order differential

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

Bracing for Earthquake Resistant Design

A Guide to linear dynamic analysis with Damping

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

Chapter 14: Periodic motion

MATH2351 Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations, Fall Hints to Week 07 Worksheet: Mechanical Vibrations

Soil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

DEGRADATION PARAMETERS FOR EQUIVALENT SDOF SYSTEMS OBTAINED FROM CYCLIC PUSHOVER ANALYSIS AND PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION

a) Find the equation of motion of the system and write it in matrix form.

Engineering Science OUTCOME 2 - TUTORIAL 3 FREE VIBRATIONS

Damping of materials and members in structures

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping

Transcription:

Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) and Response Spectrum Ahmed Elgamal 1 Dynamics of a Simple Structure The Single-Degree-Of-Freedom (SDOF) Equation References Dynamics of Structures, Anil K. Chopra, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN 0-13-85514- (Chapter 3). Elements of Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, André Filiatrault, Polytechnic International Press, Montréal, Canada, ISBN -553-0069-4 (Section 4..3). 1

Equation of motion (external force) Free-Body Diagram (FBD) f I p(t) f S f D f s f D f I + f D + f s = p(t) where f I,f D, and f s are forces due to Inertia, Damping and Stiffness respectively: m u cu ku p(t) k 1 f s = k u u c 1 f D = c ů ů c m u (t) p(t) f D f S f I p(t) k FBD Mass-spring damper system 3 Earthquake Ground Motion (u g ) f I + f D + f s = 0 f I = m u = m(u u t m(u u g ) cu ku 0 mu cu ku mu g g ) You may note that: u g (t) = (t) External force Earthquake Excitation u g (t) Fixed base u = relative displacement (displacement of the structure relative to the ground) u t = total displacement f I = m x (total or absolute acceleration) 4

Undamped natural frequency Property of structure when allowed to vibrate freely without external excitation k m Undamped natural circular frequency of vibration (radians/second) f natural cyclic frequency of vibration (cycles/second or 1/second or Hz) 1 T natural period of vibration (second) f T is the time required for one cycle of free vibration T If damping is present, replace by D where D 1 natural frequency*, and c m c c c fraction of critical damping coefficient (damping ratio, zeta) c (dimensionless measure of damping) km c c m km c c = critical damping * Note: In earthquake engineering, D = approximately, since is usually below 0. (or 0%) 5 cin c is general the least level < 0., of i.e., damping D that, fprevents D f, T = oscillation T D u In c c general least damping < 0., that i.e., prevents D, oscillation f D f, T = T D c c or larger 1 may be in the range of 0.0 0. or % - 0% 5% is sometimes a typical value. e.g., damper on a swinging door t in terms of mu cu ku mu g u c m u k u m u g u u u u g 6 3

Note: After the phase of forced vibration (due to external force or base excitation, or initial conditions), the structure continues to vibrate in a free vibration mode till it stops due to damping. The ratio between amplitude in two successive cycles is ui e ui1 where we define the logarithmic decrement as u i ln if you measure a free vibration response you can find. u i1 Note: for peaks j cycles apart u i u i+1 u ln i j j ui j Free vibration 7 Why is c c m km Critical viscous damping The free vibration equation may be written as m x cx kx 0 and the general solution is c m x C1 e c k m m t C c m e c k m m t c if m k m, the radical part of the exponent will vanish. This will produce aperiodic response (non-oscillatory). In this case c k or c km c c (m) m k since, c c is also equal to m (note that km m m m ) m k and also cc km k(k / ) 8 4

mw k1(w u1g ) k (w u g ) 0 mw (k1 k )w k1u1g kug c c c (0.05 for example) cc (k1 k )m if u1g ug ug mw (k1 k)w (k1 k) u but w = u + u g g m u(k1 k)ug (k1 k)u mu g (k1 k) ug or m u (k1 k)u m u g 9 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 10 5

First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 11 Deformation Response Spectrum For a given EQ excitation calculate u max from SDOF response with a certain and within a range of natural periods or frequencies. u max for each frequency will be found from the computed u(t) history at this frequency. A plot of u max vs. natural period is constructed representing the deformation (or displacement) response spectrum (S d ). From this figure, one can directly read the maximum relative displacement of any structure of natural period T (and a particular value of as damping) From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, A Primer 1 6

First version: 003 (Last modified 010) Example Units for natural frequency calculation (SI units) Weight = 9.81 kn = 9810 N = 9810 kg (m /s ) Gravity (g) = 9.81m/s Mass (m) = W/g = 9180/9.81 = 1000 kg Stiffness (k) = 81 kn/m = 81000 N/m = 81000 kg (m/s )/m = kg /s = SQRT (k/m) = SQRT (81000/1000) = 9 radians/sec f = / ( ) = 1.43 Hz (units of 1/s or cycles/sec) Units for natural frequency calculation (English units) Weight (W) = 193. Tons = 193. (000) = 386,400 lbs = 386.4 kips g = 386.4 in/sec/sec (or in/s ) Mass (m) = W/g = 1.0 kips s /in Stiffness (k) = 144 kips/in =SQRT (k/m) = 1 radians/sec f = / ( ) = 1.91 Hz (units of 1/s or cycles/sec) Note: The weight of an object is the force of gravity on the object and may be defined as the mass times the acceleration of gravity, w = mg. Weight is what is measured by a scale (e.g., weight of a person). Since the weight is a force, its SI unit is Newton. 13 Concept of Equivalent lateral force f s If f s is applied as a static force, it would cause the deformation u. Thus at any instant of time: f s = ku(t), or in terms of the mass f s (t) = m u(t) The maximum force will be fs,max m u max ku max msa ksd k Sa S d m Sa Sd k m S d = deformation or displacement response spectrum Sa Sd = pseudo-acceleration response spectrum The maximum strain energy E max stored in the structure during shaking is: E max 1 ku max where Sv S d 1 ks d 1 k ω S ω d 1 mω S d = pseudo-velocity response spectrum 1 ms V From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, A Primer 14 7

Note that S d, S v and S a are inter-related by Sa Sd Sv S a, S v are directly related to S d by and respectively or by (f) and f; or and as shown in Figure. T T Due to this direct relation, a 4-way plot is usually used to display S a, S v and S d on a single graph as shown in Figure. In this figure, the logarithm of period T, S a, S v and S d is used. From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, A Primer 15 From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures 16 8

In order to cover the damping range of interest, it is common to perform the same calculations for =0.0, 0.0, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.0 (see Figure) Typical Notation: S v PSV V S a PSA A S d SD D Example (El-Centro motion): Find maximum displacement and base shear of tower with f = Hz, = % and k = 1.5 MN/m Period T = 1/f = 0.5 second S d =.5 inches = 0.0635 m Force max = ku max = 1.5 MN/m x 0.0635m = 95.5 kn From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, A Primer 17 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 18 9

September 003 (5% Damping) 19 September 003 0 10

Inspection of this figure shows that the maximum response at short period (high frequency stiff structure) is controlled by the ground acceleration, low frequency (long period) by ground displacement, and intermediate period by ground velocity. Get copy of El-Centro (May 18, 1940) earthquake record S00E (N-S component) ftp nisee.ce.berkeley.edu (18.3.43.154) login: anonymous password: your_indent cd pub/a.k.chopra get el_centro.data quit From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures 1 Note that response spectrum for relative velocity may be obtained from the SDOF response history, and similarly for ü t =(ü+ü g ). These spectra are known as relative velocity and total acceleration response spectra, and are different from the pseudo velocity and pseudo acceleration spectra S v and S a (which are directly related to S d ). e.g. for = 0% m(ü+ü g ) + ku = 0 or (ü+ü g ) + u = 0 From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures 11

3 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 4 1

First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 5 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 6 13

First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 7 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) 8 14

9 30 15

31 3 16

33 34 17

35 36 18

Elastic Design Spectrum Use recorded ground motions (available) Use ground motions recorded at similar sites: Magnitude of earthquake Distance of site form earthquake fault Fault mechanism Local Soil Conditions Geology/travel path of seismic waves From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures Motions recorded at the same location. For design, we need an envelope. One way is to take the average (mean) of these values (use statistics to define curves for mean and standard deviation, see next page) 37 From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures The response spectra used to derive this design spectrum would typically share common characteristics of relevance to the geographic location of interest such as: distance from causative fault, soil profile at the site, expected earthquake magnitude, fault rupture mechanism, and so forth,.. Mean response spectrum is smooth relative to any of the original contributing spectra 38 19

As an alternative Empirical approach, the periods shown on the this Figure and the values in the Table can be used to construct a Median elastic design spectrum (or a Median + one Sigma), where Sigma is the Standard Deviation. For any geographic location, these spectra are built based on an estimate of peak ground acceleration, velocity, and displacement as this location. From: Chopra, Dynamics of Structures The periods and values in Table 6.9.1 were selected to give a good match to a statistical curve such as Figure 6.9. based on an ensemble of 50 earthquakes on competent soils. 39 First version: 003 (Last modified 010) (Design Spectrum may include more than one Earthquake fault scenario) http://dap3.dot.ca.gov/shake_stable/ About Caltrans ARS Online This web-based tool calculates both deterministic and probabilistic acceleration response spectra for any location in California based on criteria provided in Appendix B of Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria 40 0